Selective use of temporary intravascular shunts in coincident vascular and orthopedic upper and lower limb trauma

Traumatic Lower Extremity Vascular Injuries and Limb Salvage in a Civilian Urban Trauma Center

BACKGROUND

Data on management of traumatic lower extremity injuries comes largely from military experience and involves few civilian centers. This study reports on the experience of an urban trauma center and factors associated with limb loss.

METHODS

A retrospective review of lower extremity arterial injuries between 2013-2020 at an academic urban level 1 trauma center was completed. Patients with lower extremity revascularization were included in the final data analysis. Demographics, clinical variables, operative details, type of revascularization, as well as 30-day morbidity and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. The primary outcome of interest was 30-day limb loss. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

75 patients were included in our analysis. 69 were male (92%), mean age 33 ±15 years, 50 patients had penetrating trauma (67%), mean injury severity score was 15±9. 30-day limb loss was reported in 8 (11%). Factors associated with limb loss included female sex (p=0.001), high body mass index (BMI) (p=0.001), blunt injury (p=0.001), associated fractures (p=0.005), significant soft tissue injury (p=0.007), delayed repair after shunt placement (p=0.003), bypass revascularization (p=0.001), initial revascularization failure (p=0.019), and wound complications (p<0.001). Fifty-five patients had at least one return to the operating room (ROR), including 24 patients (32%) for complications related to their revascularization. These included delayed compartment syndrome (n=7), revascularization failure (n=9), bleeding (n=3), and vascular surgical wound complications (n=5). Mean length of hospital stay (LOS) for the cohort was 24±20 days with 3±3 ROR, in contrast patients who ultimately required amputation had LOS of 57±21 days with 8±4 ROR. 57 patients (76%) followed in clinic for a median 36[14-110] days, with only 32 (43%) at > 30 days. 23 reported ambulation without assistance, 9 neuromotor deficit including 1 patient that had delayed amputation.

CONCLUSION

Patients with blunt trauma and associated fracture and/or extensive soft tissue injury are at risk of limb loss. These injuries are often associated with postoperative wound complications, requiring aggressive soft tissue care that substantially increases ROR and LOS; Expectations for limb salvage in these patients should be tempered when the other associated factors with limb loss mentioned above are also present. When limb salvage is achieved, regaining full limb function remains a challenge.

Management of upper extremity arterial penetrating vascular trauma

Penetrating vascular injuries in the upper extremity are relatively uncommon; suboptimal treatment may result in significant morbidity including amputation. Arterial trauma accounted for 68% of amputations (24% in the upper extremity) during World War II. Although surgical techniques including microsurgical principles have matured, results vary secondary to the mechanism of injury, systemic factors, anatomic considerations and physiologic events. This annotated review article is based upon the literature and the author's 42 years of vascular trauma experience including over 1500 revascularizations and replantations. It discusses the complex interplay of associated injuries; the mechanism of injury, the location of the injury; the collateral circulation; the extent of soft tissue damage; the adequacy of debridement; the significance of pre-existing conditions; and magnitude of wound contamination. Based upon this evaluation, a guide to indications for arterial reconstruction is provided and a comprehensive management plan for vascular trauma may be derived.

Management of complex forearm defects: A multidisciplinary approach

Complex forearm defects with significant damage to, or loss of skin, tendon, muscle, bone and neurovascular structures represent a great challenge for surgeons. The management of such injuries, whether a result of trauma or tumor resection, is focused on preservation of the damaged limb and restoration of hand function. A multidisciplinary approach combining plastic and orthopedic surgical expertise in a coordinated team is proposed to address these challenging cases. The authors have laid emphasis on adequate debridement for wound bed preparation, bone stabilization and reconstruction for a stable bony framework, vascular repair for early revascularization, musculotendinous and nerve reconstruction as well as vascularized tissue coverage on a case-to-case basis to facilitate optimal functional recovery. They also maintain that besides expedient surgical treatment, early mobilization based on an individualized rehabilitation program as well as psychological and socio-professional supports are necessary means of achieving rapid and successful social integration.

Medial approach for the treatment of femur fractures in association with vascular injury

INTRODUCTION

To highlight an alternative method of treatment for femoral fractures associated with vascular injury, allowing both fracture fixation and vascular repair from the same surgical approach.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Twelve patients with arterial injury as a consequence of femoral fracture were treated by internal fixation. There were five femoral diaphysis, seven distal femoral including supracondylar and intercondylar fractures. Four patients had injury to the popliteal artery, whereas eight to the superficial femoral artery. Seven patients had a nerve injury. Medial femoral approach was used both for the fixation of the fracture and vascular repair. Fracture fixation was done by plate-screw in all patients, whereas vascular injuries were treated using saphenous vein interposition graft in ten patients and end-to-end repair in two patients. Nerve injuries were not dealt by exploration during the vascular repair.

RESULTS

All of the limbs were ultimately survived. Clinical and radiological union was observed in all patients at the last follow-up radiographs. Of the 4 total sciatic nerve palsies, 2 had developed total, one had tibial nerve recovery. One patient had no motor recovery. Of the 3 peroneal nerve palsies, 1 patient had recovery, 2 patients had no motor improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

A midlateral approach is traditionally used for fractures of femur when plates and screws are used for fixation. In association with vascular injury, this procedure requires two separate incisions. The added soft tissue disruption associated with open reduction and internal fixation by lateral incision can be reduced with the use of single medial approach, which allows bony stabilization under direct visualization of the repaired vessels.

Development of a Puncture Technique for Implanting Temporary Vascular Shunts in a Porcine Model

BACKGROUND

Temporary vascular shunts (TVSs) are an effective tool for rapidly restoring blood flow to a limb or organ that has experienced vascular injury and ischemia and for which revascularization is not an immediate option. Usually, through an opening in the skin, the TVS is positioned within the proximal and distal stumps of the injured vessel, restoring perfusion and stopping the ischemia. The aim of this study is to compare standard TVS technique and a developed puncture technique for implanting TVS and to evaluate the utility and feasibility of this protocol after arterial lesions, in pigs.

METHODS

Vascular injuries were inflicted in both hind limbs of 30 pigs, and vascular interventions were performed, using standard and puncture TVS. Because each pig was implanted with both types of TVSs, it was possible to simultaneously monitor, analyze, and compare parameters such as, the mean arterial pressure (MAP, in mm Hg), blood flow (mL/min), and insertion times, in the same animal.

RESULTS

It was observed that the MAP in the limbs recovered and approached systemic MAP, in 100% of the experiments, in both groups. Analysis of the blood flow data showed that this parameter was significantly reduced in the puncture TVS group (110.36 ± 9.99 mL/min vs. 153.20 ± 18.57 mL/min, P = 0.001). On the other hand, the insertion time for the standard TVS was significantly greater than that of the puncture shunt (15.32 ± 3.08 min vs. 10.37 ± 1.7 min, P = 0.001). Furthermore, it was found that the primary and secondary patency and complication rates were similar for both TVS types.

CONCLUSION

Thus, given the adequate MAP recovery and reduction in implantation time observed in this experimental and in an animal model study, the use of the puncture TVS technique is effective and feasible.

Isolated Common Femoral Artery Injury Resulting from Blunt Military Trauma

The incidence of an isolated femoral vessel injury in the absence of fractures or other organ injury is extremely rare. A 20-yr-old male Korean soldier was taken to the hospital with a common femoral artery (CFA) obstruction. Injured CFA segment was resected and replaced by using 7-mm PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) graft. Two months after the surgical treatment, the patient discharged from the hospital without any complaints or postoperative complications. We report an unusual case of isolated femoral artery injury due to blunt trauma during military service with following review of literature.

Vascular Shunts in Civilian Trauma

Experience with temporary intravascular shunts (TIVS) for vessel injury comes from the military sector and while the indications might be clear in geographically isolated and under resourced war zones, this may be an uncommon scenario in civilian trauma. Data supporting TIVS use in civilian trauma have been extrapolated from the military literature where it demonstrated improved life and limb salvage. Few non-comparative studies from the civilian literature have also revealed similar favorable outcomes. Still, TIVS placement in civilian vascular injuries is uncommon and by some debatable given the absence of clear indications for placement, the potential for TIVS-related complications, the widespread resources for immediate and definitive vascular repair, and the need for curtailing costs and optimizing resources. This article reviews the current evidence and the role of TIVS in contemporary civilian trauma management.

Temporary arterial shunts in damage control: Experience and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Arterial shunting is a well-described method to control hemorrhage and rapidly reestablish flow, but optimal shunt dwell times remain controversial. We hypothesized that prolonged shunt dwell times of more than 6 hours are related to adverse outcomes after major arterial injury.

METHODS

A review (2005-2013) of all patients with arterial shunts placed after traumatic injury at our urban Level I trauma center was undertaken. Patients who died prior to shunt removal (n = 7) were excluded. Shunt complications were defined as dislodgement, thrombosis, and distal ischemia. Patients were compared on the basis of shunt complications with respect to clinical parameters.

RESULTS

The 42 patients who underwent arterial shunting after major vascular injury were primarily young (median, 26 years; interquartile range [IQR], 22-31 years) males (97.6%), severely injured (Injury Severity Score, 17.5 [IQR, 14-29]; shunted vessel Abbreviated Injury Scale score, 4 [IQR, 3-4]) by gunshot (85.7%) requiring neck/torso (33.3%) or upper-extremity (19.1%) or lower-extremity (47.6%) shunts. Thirty-five patients survived until shunt removal, and 5 (14.3%) of 35 developed shunt complications. Demographics and clinical characteristics were compared between those with shunt dwell times of less than 6 hours (n = 19) and more than 6 hours (n = 16). While patients appeared to have a greater injury burden overall in the group with dwell times of more than 6 hours, there were no statistical differences between groups with respect to age, gender, initial systolic blood pressure or hemodynamics during the shunt dwell period, use of vasopressors, Abbreviated Injury Scale score of the shunted vessel, Injury Severity Score, or outcomes including limb amputation or mortality. No patients (0/19) with shunt dwell times of less than 6 hours developed complications, whereas 5 (31.3%) of 16 patients with dwell times of more than 6 hours developed shunt complications (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this civilian series, 14% of patients with arterial shunts developed shunt complications. Our data suggest that limiting shunt dwell times to less than 6 hours when clinically feasible may decrease adverse outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management study, level IV.

[Acute therapeutic measures for limb salvage Part 1 : Haemorrhage control, emergency revascularization, compartment syndrome]

The primary care of Gustilo-Anderson type IIIC extremity injuries with relevant vessel lacerations is decisive for the success of a limb salvage procedure. This article shall present substantial emergency procedures for the salvage of the nutritive perfusion of a mangled extremity, based on the current literature. After provisory control of a peripheral haemorrhage (e. g. by manual pressure or tourniquet), an immediate decision must be made about the kind of emergency revascularization to be implemented as the limb salvage procedure. Here, the temporary intravascular shunt will be the fastest technique that can ensure a sufficient tissue perfusion in the case of vessel lacerations. Regarding the treatment of a fracture versus perfusion recovery, a shortening of ischemia time should have priority over fracture stabilization.If an acute compartment syndrome is suspected, a documented monitoring has to be performed in the limb salvage situation for 24 hours with clinical controls every 4 hours. Disproportional pain that does not respond to analgesics, and passive muscle stretching pain can be seen as cardinal symptoms. The positive predictive value of clinical findings is <15 %. During the observation period with an impending but not manifest compartment syndrome, an elevation of the extremity above heart level or its cooling are contraindicated. An intracompartmental pressure measurement is the most important instrument-based supplemental diagnostic method. The open fasciotomy of the affected compartments is the only causal therapy and should be performed as fast as possible. A decision against fasciotomy in cases of non-explicit clinical signs should not be made without a documented intracompartmental pressure measurement.

Venous Shunt Versus Venous Ligation for Vascular Damage Control: The Immunohistochemical Evidence

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the expression of immunohistochemical markers of tissue ischemia (iNOS, eNOS, and HSP70) in a vascular damage control experimental model to determine if a venous temporary vascular shunt insertion leads to a better limb perfusion when compared with the ligature of the injured vein.

METHODS

Experimental study in male Sus Scrofa weighting 40 Kg. Animals were distributed into 5 groups: group 1 animals were submitted to right external iliac artery (EIA) shunting and right external iliac vein (EIV) ligation; group 2 animals were submitted to right EIA shunting and right EIV shunting; group 3 animals were submitted to right EIV ligation; group 4 animals were submitted to right EIV shunting; group 5 animals were not submitted to vascular shunting or venous ligation. Transonic Systems flowmeters were used to measure vascular flow on right and left external iliac vessels, and i-STAT (Abbot) portable blood analyzer was used for EIVs blood biochemical analysis. An initial baseline register of invasive arterial pressure, iliac vessels flow, and venous blood analysis was performed. Arterial pressure and iliac vessels flow were taken immediately after right iliac vessels shunting or ligation. Then, hemorrhagic shock was induced by continuous 20 mL/min blood withdraw from the external right jugular vein whereas arterial blood pressure and iliac vessels flow registers were taken every 10 min, and blood samples from EIVs were obtained every 30 min until the vascular flow through right EIA (or through the shunt inserted into the right EIV for group 4 animals) became inexistent or until the animal's death. After the end of the experiments, bilateral hind limb's biopsies were obtained for immunohistochemical analysis. Using image editing and analysis software, the expression of iNOS, eNOS, and HSP70 (3 well-known ischemic associated immunohistochemical markers) was assessed. The mean expression of each marker in the right hind limb was compared between groups. For statistical analysis, Microsoft Office Excel 2007 and BioEstat 5.0 (2007) were used.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical analysis showed no difference regarding the iNOS expression; nevertheless, both eNOS and HSP70 expression were statistically more intense (P < 0.05) on group 1 (eNOS = 1.32; HSP70 = 15.05) than on group 2 (eNOS = 0.018; HSP70 = 8.56).

CONCLUSIONS

The higher expression of eNOS and HSP70 in the right hind limbs of group 1 animals (arterial shunt and venous ligature) than group 2 animals (arterial shunt and venous shunt) suggests that venous ligation is associated with more intense ischemic histological findings than venous shunting.

Successful Limb Reperfusion Using Prolonged Intravascular Shunting in a Case of an Unstable Trauma Patient

When peripheral vascular injuries present in conjunction with life threatening emergencies, controlling hemorrhage from a peripheral blood vessel may take initial priority, however, sacrificing a limb to preserve life is a well-established dictum. The use of intravascular shunts has allowed arterial and venous injuries to be controlled and temporized while treating other injuries. Typically, intravascular shunts are used for short time periods while orthopedic injuries are repaired or other life threatening injuries are managed. The following case demonstrates the long-term use of an intravascular arterial shunt to treat a traumatic transection of the common femoral artery and vein in a patient with an open pelvic fracture from blunt trauma. A 20-year-old woman fell between a subway platform and an oncoming train. She sustained a crush injury to her lower extremity and pelvis as she was pinned between the train and platform. The patient presented with active hemorrhage from a groin laceration, quickly became hemodynamically unstable, and was brought to the operating room. In addition to a pelvic fracture with massive pelvic hematoma she sustained a complete transection of the bifurcation of the common femoral artery (CFA), the common femoral vein (CFV), and associated orthopedic injuries. Vascular shunts were placed in the common femoral artery and vein. The patient became hypotensive from an expanding retroperitoneal hematoma. Pelvic bleeding was controlled with angioembolization and the venous injury was repaired. At this time the patient became cold, acidotic, and coagulopathic. It was thought unsafe to proceed with the arterial repair and it was elected to keep her arterial shunts in place and perform a planned reexploration in 24 hours after correcting her physiologic status. The patient returned to the operating room for an elective repair of her CFA the following day. Her shunt had remained patent throughout this time. She underwent a reverse saphenous vein graft from her CFA to her SFA. After a prolonged hospital course she was ultimately transferred to a rehabilitation center with intact pulses in both lower extremities. This case demonstrates the effectiveness of prolonged (>6 hours) use of an intravascular shunt as part of damage control surgery for peripheral arterial and venous injuries. In a patient who would otherwise undergo an amputation for their injury, the risk of shunt thrombosis, or infection, during damage control resuscitation may not be a contraindication for placement.

Gustilo type IIIC open tibia fractures with vascular repair: minimum 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE

Salvage or amputation for grade 3C open fracture of tibia is not well responded question universally because of surgical innovations, cultural believes, difficulties in estimate the outcome, coasts, and different results in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of Gustilo grade 3C open tibia fractures with at least two years follow-up in non-military adults.

METHODS

Twenty-two non-military patients with a mean age of 31.1 were operated with grade 3c open fractures at tibia level in last 10 years in our clinic. We evaluated them retrospectively and asked about their daily life, pain, and if present, about the wish for secondary amputation. We also asked if they would prefer a first day amputation rather than their present status.

RESULTS

Mean operation time after the injury was 13 h. Seven patients had nerve injury. Mean operation number was 3.5. Eight patients (%36) (all due to circulatory problem) had to have amputation. All patients treated with temporary unilateral external fixation than converted to circular external fixators when soft tissue healing was completed. Two patients were reoperated because of deformity. Four patients needed revision surgery because of non-union. At long term follow, we had osteomyelitis in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Scoring systems and the ischemic time are not the only predictors of amputation. The decision of the treatment mode should be made by the patient and the care team after discussing the options and outcomes rather than relying on a scoring system.

Temporary vascular shunt for damage control of extremity vascular injury: A toolbox for trauma surgeons

In an emergency, a general surgeon may be faced with the need to treat arterial trauma of the extremities when specialized vascular surgery is not available in their hospital setting, either because an arterial lesion was not diagnosed during pre-admission triage, or because of iatrogenic arterial injury. The need for urgent control of hemorrhage and limb ischemia may contra-indicate immediate transfer to a hospital with a specialized vascular surgery service. For a non-specialized surgeon, hemostasis and revascularization rely largely on damage control techniques and the use of temporary vascular shunts (TVS). Insertion of a TVS is indicated for vascular injuries involving the proximal portion of extremity vessels, while hemorrhage from distal arterial injuries can be treated with simple arterial ligature. Proximal and distal control of the injured vessel must be obtained, followed by proximal and distal Fogarty catheter thrombectomy and lavage with heparinized saline. The diameter of the TVS should be closely approximated to that of the artery; use of an oversized TVS may result in intimal tears. Systematic performance of decompressive fasciotomy is recommended in order to prevent compartment syndrome. In the immediate postoperative period, the need for systematic use of anticoagulant or anti-aggregant medications has not been demonstrated. The patient should be transferred to a specialized center for vascular surgery as soon as possible. The interval before definitive revascularization depends on the overall condition of the patient. The long-term limb conservation results after placement of a TVS are identical to those obtained when initial revascularization is performed.

Temporary vascular shunts

Temporary vascular shunts have been used for nearly 100 years in patients. Originally, they were used as vascular grafts that were likely to thrombose as collaterals would hopefully develop. More recently, they have been used as a device to be replaced by a permanent vascular graft during the same operation or at a reoperation. Indications for the use of shunts are a "damage control" procedure for a peripheral or truncal vascular injury, Gustilo IIIC fracture of an extremity, need for perfusion as a complex revascularization is performed, and planned replantation of a hand, forearm, or arm. They are used in approximately 8% of vascular injuries treated in urban trauma centers in the United States and have an excellent patency rate without heparinization.

Prolonged indwelling time of temporary vascular shunts is associated with increased endothelial injury in the porcine mesenteric artery

BACKGROUND

Temporary intravascular shunts (TIVS) have been used as a damage control surgery (DCS) adjuncts in superior mesenteric artery (SMA) injuries, both experimentally and clinically. However, no study to date has evaluated the relationship between shunt indwelling time and resultant endothelial cell (EC) injury. We hypothesized that prolonged use of TIVS in SMA injuries would jeopardize EC integrity.

METHOD

After laparotomy, the SMA was clamped and transected while pigs were hemorrhaged to 40 mm Hg for 30 minutes. A TIVS was inserted between transected ends of the SMA without systemic anticoagulation. Totally, 24 animals were resuscitated and randomized to different shunt indwelling time groups: A, 3 hours; B, 6 hours; C, 9 hours; and D, 12 hours. Patency of shunts was monitored and recorded. Continuous wave Doppler was used as a determinant of adequacy of flow through the shunts. Transmural SMA biopsies from areas of TIVS placement were examined with electron microscopy for histopathologic injury after staining with hematoxylin and eosin and immunofluorescence using a validated histopathologic injury score (minimum-maximum score: 0-4).

RESULTS

Severity of endothelial injury was observed to be directly related to shunt indwell time. SMA transmural biopsies harvested from group D animals showed the most profound injury, demonstrating extensive EC denudations and marked intimal rupture (injury grade, 3.4 ± 0.2). Sections from group A animals revealed the mildest EC injury (1.3 ± 0.3 vs. group D p < 0.01). No significant difference was detected between group A and B. EC injury grade in group C (2.7 ± 0.6) was higher than that in group B (1.8 ± 0.6) but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

When possible, vascular reconstruction following use of shunts should include an interposition graft after debridement of the arterial edges having interfaced with the shunt. Finally, to minimize intimal injury to the native vessel, this model suggests that indwell times of shunts should be <9 hours.

Diagnosis and management of knee dislocations

An acute knee dislocation is an uncommon injury, with a high rate of associated vascular and neurologic injuries as well as potentially limb-threatening complications. High-energy trauma is the most common cause of an acute knee dislocation, although lower-energy injuries, such as those sustained during athletic competition, are increasing in incidence. Injuries to the popliteal artery and common peroneal nerve are relatively common, requiring a high index of suspicion and complete neurovascular examination in a timely fashion. All cases of suspected knee dislocation should have an ankle-brachial index performed, reserving arteriography for those with an abnormal finding. Initial management consists of closed reduction, if possible, and application of a hinged brace or external fixator. Definitive management remains an area of controversy, although anatomic surgical repair or reconstruction is favored by most surgeons to help optimize knee function. Most patients treated for a knee dislocation can expect to return to their daily activities, but with less predictable returns to sporting activities.

The use of temporary vascular shunts in military extremity wounds: a preliminary outcome analysis with 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

The use of temporary vascular shunts (TVS)s in the management of wartime extremity vascular injuries has received an increasing amount of attention. However, the overall impact of this adjunct remains incompletely defined. The objective of this study is to characterize outcomes of those patients who suffered wartime extremity vascular injuries managed with TVSs.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of the Navy and Marine Corps Combat Trauma Registry examining peripheral vascular injuries treated during the military conflicts in the Middle East. Patient demographics, injury severity score, mechanism of injury, and vessels injured were recorded. Operative reports were reviewed for use of TVSs, type of definitive repair, the need for amputation, and survival.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were included. Forty-six (57%) had TVSs placed and 34 (43%) underwent repair at initial presentation. The mean injury severity score for the TVS group and the non-TVS groups were 15.0 +/- 5.05 and 12.9 +/- 10.18, respectively, (p = 0.229). There were a total of 13 amputations, 6 (13%) in the TVS group and 7 (21%) in the non-TVS group (p = 0.38). There was no difference in amputation rates between either group. There were no recorded mortalities in either group. Median patient follow-up was 24.5 months (range, 3-48 months).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the importance and utility of TVSs in the management of wartime extremity vascular injury. When used to restore perfusion to an injured extremity, there seems to be no adverse effects or overall increase in limb loss rates and therefore a useful adjunct in the surgery for limb salvage.

Comparisons of three surgical procedures on intestine ischemia reperfusion injury in a superior mesenteric artery injury model

BACKGROUND

Temporary ligation, primary anastomosis, and temporary shunt have been reported to deal with superior mesenteric artery (SMA) injuries. We aimed to investigate which brought minimal ischemia reperfusion injury in a hypothermic traumatic shock swine model.

METHODS

SMA was completely clamped while pigs were hemorrhaged to a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 40 mm Hg. Animals were then randomized into temporary ligation (A, n=8), primary anastomosis (B, n=8), temporary shunt (C, n=8), and control groups (n=4). Animals in group A remained SMA interrupted for additional 1h while the other groups underwent the corresponding procedures immediately. Intestine injury was assessed by histologic examination and measurement of lipid peroxidations at the end of ischemia and experiment.

RESULTS

Overall mortality rate was 50%, 25%, and 0% in groups A, B, and C, respectively (P<0.05). The total intestine ischemia time was predominantly shorter in group C in the other groups. Remarkable elevations of malonaldehyde (MDA) in small intestine were noted after reperfusion in group A. Animals in other groups, however, did not exacerbate during the 6-h reperfusion (resuscitation period). Group C showed the lowest MDA level at the end of experiment. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) levels showed no significant elevations during the ischemia or early reperfusion period; nevertheless, it reached approximately 3- to 6-fold in groups A and B (compared with baseline, P<0.01), and remained unchanged in group C at the end of experiment.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that temporary shunt insertion might be preferred as it shortens ischemia time, alleviates intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury, and thus decreases early mortality in this animal model.

Upper extremity arterial injuries: factors influencing treatment outcome

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to identify factors influencing surgical treatment outcome following upper extremity arterial injuries.

METHODS

This 15-year study (January 1992 to December 2006) included 167 patients with 189 civilian, iatrogenic or military upper extremity arterial injuries requiring surgical intervention. Patient data were prospectively entered into a vascular trauma database and retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

The most frequently damaged vessel was the brachial artery (55% of injuries), followed by the axillary (21.7%), antebrachial (21.2%) and subclavian (2.1%) arteries. Three primary amputations (1.8%) were performed because of extensive soft-tissue destruction and signs of irreversible ischaemia on admission. Seven secondary amputations (4.2%) were due to graft failure, infection, anastomotic disruption or the extent of soft-tissue and nerve damage. Fasciotomy was required in 9.6% of cases. Operative mortality was 2.4% (four deaths). Early graft failure, compartment syndrome, associated skeletal and brachial plexus damage and a military mechanism of injury were found to be significant risk factors for limb loss (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Although careful physical examination should diagnose the majority of upper extremity arterial injuries, angiography is helpful in detailing their site and extent. Prompt reconstruction is essential for optimal results. Nerve trauma is the primary cause of long-term functional disability.

Temporary intravascular shunting improves survival in a hypothermic traumatic shock swine model with superior mesenteric artery injuries

BACKGROUND

Repairs of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) injuries are difficult and often result in high mortality. Our group has employed temporary intravascular shunts (TIVS) as a damage control procedure in a SMA transection model and hypothesized that TIVS would improve survival when compared with primary vascular anastomosis in the setting of a damage control surgery.

METHODS

The SMA was clamped and completely transected while pigs were hemorrhaged to a mean arterial pressure of 40 mmHg and maintained in shock for 30 minutes. Cold lactated Ringer's solution was gradually infused while the abdomen was open to induce hypothermia. Animals were randomized to control (no resuscitation), primary anastomosis (PA), or temporary shunting (TS) of the SMA. Animals were resuscitated for 6 hours with the shed blood and lactated Ringer's solution. Delayed anastomosis was performed in TS animals after resuscitation. Surviving animals were humanely killed 2 days after operation. Systemic hemodynamic parameters were recorded hourly. The ileum was harvested at the end of resuscitation and experiment for pathologic evaluation.

RESULTS

All animals suffered extreme physiologic conditions: hypothermia, severe acidosis, hypotension, and depressed cardiac output and oxygen delivery. Control animals suffered 100% mortality. Compared with the PA group, TS animals required less resuscitation fluid, retained higher SMA flow rates, normalized lactate levels faster, suffered less severe intestine histopathology, and had greater early survival.

CONCLUSION

Damage control surgery in the setting of SMA transection seems better managed with TS than with PA. Further validation of this model is required before generalization to human applications.

Temporary Intravascular Shunts: When Are We Really Using Them According to the NTDB?

Temporary intravascular shunts (TIVS) are synthetic intraluminal conduits that maintain arterial and/or venous blood flow. This technique can be used for: 1) replantation; 2) open extremity fractures with extensive soft tissue and arterial injuries; or 3) damage control (extremity/truncal). The literature defining TIVS is composed exclusively of small case series (primarily penetrating injuries). Our goal was to identify the injured population who actually undergoes TIVS using the National Trauma Data Bank (2001 to 2005). TIVS were placed in 395 patients (mean Injury Severity Score = 26; initial hemodynamic instability = 24%; mean based deficit = –7.2; mortality = 14%). Blunt mechanisms caused 64 per cent (251 of 395) of cases. Penetrating injuries were primarily gunshot wounds (97%). Concurrent severe extremity fractures and/or soft tissue defects were present in 185 (74%) blunt-injured patients. Only six of 111 centers performing TIVS used this technique five or more times. Only three centers used TIVS more than 10 times. The volume of TIVS use was similar across the study period ( P > 0.05). TIVS is primarily used in blunt motor vehicle collision trauma with concurrent severe extremity fractures and soft tissue injuries. This provides distal perfusion while surgeons assess/fixate the limb. TIVS are placed relatively uncommonly by a large number of trauma centers with a few hospitals using them much more frequently for penetrating injuries.

Temporary vascular shunts as initial treatment of proximal extremity vascular injuries during combat operations: the new standard of care at Echelon II facilities?

BACKGROUND

Historically, penetrating injuries to the extremities account for up to 75% of wounds sustained during combat and 10% of deaths. Rapid vascular control and perfusion of injured extremities at forward deployed Echelon II surgical facilities is essential to limit loss of life and maximize limb preservation. We review our experience with the management of extremity vascular trauma and report the largest single Echelon II experience to date on temporary vascular shunting (TVS) for proximal extremity vascular injuries.

METHODS

Data on combat trauma patients presenting to a US Navy Echelon II forward surgical facility in Iraq were prospectively recorded during a 7-month period. Patients with suspected vascular injuries underwent exploration in the operating room. After vessel control, thrombectomy and instillation of heparinized saline, vascular injuries in the proximal extremity were temporarily shunted in a standardized fashion. Vascular injuries in the distal extremity were routinely ligated. After shunting, patients were transported to an Echelon III facility in the Iraqi Theater and underwent vascular reconstruction. They were followed through transfer to the Continental United States or discharge into the civilian Iraqi medical system. Shunt patency, limb salvage, and survival data were obtained by retrospective review of electronic medical records.

RESULTS

Six hundred ten combat trauma patients were treated from August 16, 2006 to February 25, 2007. Thirty-seven patients (6.1%) sustained 73 injuries to major extremity vascular structures. Twenty-three proximal vascular shunts were placed in 16 patients with mean Injury Severity Score of 25 (range, 17-43) and mean mangled extremity severity score (MESS) of 8 (range, 5-10). Twenty-two of 23 shunts (95.6%) were patent upon arrival to the Echelon III facility and underwent successful autologous vein reconstruction. All shunt patients survived their injuries with 100% early limb preservation as followed through their first 30 days of medical care or discharge into the local medical community.

CONCLUSIONS

Complex combat injuries to proximal extremity vessels should be routinely shunted at forward-deployed Echelon II facilities as part of the resuscitative, damage control process.

A decade's experience with temporary intravascular shunts at a civilian level I trauma center

BACKGROUND

A 10-year review of temporary intravascular shunts (TIVS) at a regional trauma center.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all patients treated with temporary intravascular shunts from January 1, 1997 to January 1, 2007.

RESULTS

Seven hundred eighty-six patients were treated for vascular injuries. Sixty-seven (9%) had a total of 101 (72 arterial, 29 venous) TIVS placed to facilitate damage control or to allow for reconstruction of Gustilo IIIc fractures or limb replantation. Seven patients who, on trauma day 0, died or had an extremity which was deemed unsalvageable were excluded. Of 60 patients who met inclusion criteria, seven died from TBI (3%), MOF (3%), sepsis (2%), deceleration of care (2%), and loss of airway (2%), which was deemed preventable.

CONCLUSIONS

TIVS have a shunt thrombosis rate of 5%, amputation rate of 18%, overall survival of 88%, and combination limb/patient survival rate of 73%. TIVS have an established role primarily in patients requiring either "damage control" for exsanguination or temporary vascular conduits during stabilization of Gustilo IIIc fractures. Truncal injuries are associated with the highest mortality likely due to accompanying multisystem trauma.

Temporary intravascular shunts used as a damage control surgery adjunct in complex vascular injury: collective review

In this systemic review, we summarise the types, configurations, durations, indications and complications of the temporary intravascular shunts used as an adjunct of damage control surgery (DCS) in severe vascular injuries. We conclude that temporary intravascular shunts can be used without systemic anticoagulation for a prolonged time to maintain distal perfusion in combined orthopaedic and vascular injuries, in the setting of DCS and transferring.

Complete femoral artery and vein avulsion from a hyperextension injury: a case report and literature review

Blunt peripheral extremity vascular injuries are much less frequent than those of penetrating injuries, especially in the absence of significant musculoskeletal trauma. We present an unusual case of complete femoral artery and vein avulsion that resulted from a forced hip hyperextension and thigh abduction after slipping when a patient's foot became entrapped in a ladder. The patient presented with an acutely ischemic right lower extremity 8 hr postinjury, which necessitated immediate surgical exploration, temporary intravascular shunting, interposition grafting, and prophylactic fasciotomy. To our knowledge, this is the first such mechanism to be reported resulting in complete transection of both femoral artery and vein. We review the mechanism of injury and management.

Management of distal femoral and popliteal arterial injuries: an update

BACKGROUND

The management of combined arterial and musculoskeletal injuries to the lower extremity remains controversial, particularly with regard to the initial order of intervention and the use of intravascular shunting. In this study, we review the contemporary management and outcome of patients treated for acute traumatic distal femoropopliteal arterial injuries.

METHODS

From January 2001 to January 2006, we repaired 57 acute traumatic lower-extremity arterial injuries in a level 1 trauma center. Our approach was to perform surgical revascularization without intraluminal shunting as soon as the arterial injury was recognized. There were 44 men (77%). Mean age was 31 years (range, 5-68). The mechanism of injury was blunt in 42 of 57 (74%) patients. Vascular reconstruction was achieved by using an autogenous saphenous vein graft in 52 of 57 (91%), a vein patch in 3 of 57 (5%), or primarily in 2 of 57 (4%) patients.

RESULTS

The limb-salvage rate was 92% (53/57). Thirty-six patients (63%) had associated orthopedic fixation: 12 of 36 (33%) before and 24 of 36 (67%) after revascularization. Twenty-one of 57 patients (37%) had vascular repair only without orthopedic fixation. Thirty-four patients (60%) required fasciotomy. Four patients had subsequent above-knee amputation: 3 because of wound complications despite successful revascularization and 1 because of failed revascularization. There were no complications related to the arterial repairs that were performed before orthopedic fixation.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that arterial reconstruction for acute traumatic lower-limb injuries results in a good limb-salvage rate. We advocate prompt vascular repair before orthopedic intervention for combined vascular and skeletal injuries of the lower extremity, without using intravascular shunting.

Tactical Surgical Intervention With Temporary Shunting of Peripheral Vascular Trauma Sustained During Operation Iraqi Freedom: One Unit??s Experience

BACKGROUND

Rapidly restoring perfusion to injured extremities is one of the primary missions of forward military surgical teams. The austere setting, limited resources, and grossly contaminated nature of wounds encountered complicates early definitive repair of complex combat vascular injuries. Temporary vascular shunting of these injuries in the forward area facilitates rapid restoration of perfusion while allowing for deferment of definitive repair until after transport to units with greater resources and expertise.

METHODS

Standard Javid or Sundt shunts were placed to temporarily bypass complex peripheral vascular injuries encountered by a forward US Navy surgical unit during a six month interval of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Data from the time of injury through transfer out of Iraq were prospectively recorded. Each patient's subsequent course at Continental US medical centers was retrospectively reviewed once the operating surgeons had returned from deployment.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven vascular shunts were used to bypass complex vascular injuries in twenty combat casualties with a mean injury severity score of 18 (range 9-34) and mean mangled extremity severity score of 9 (range 6-11). All patients survived although three (15%) ultimately required amputation for nonvascular complications. Six (22%) shunts clotted during transport but an effective perfusion window was provided even in these cases.

CONCLUSION

Temporary vascular shunting appears to provide simple and effective means of restoring limb perfusion to combat casualties at the forward level.

The Use of Temporary Vascular Shunts as a Damage Control Adjunct in the Management of Wartime Vascular Injury

BACKGROUND

While the use of vascular shunts as a damage control adjunct has been described in series from civilian institutions no contemporary military experience has been reported. The objective of this study is to examine patterns of use and effectiveness of temporary vascular shunts in the contemporary management of wartime vascular injury.

MATERIALS

From September 1, 2004 to August 31, 2005, 2,473 combat injuries were treated at the central echelon III surgical facility in Iraq. Vascular injuries were entered into a registry and reviewed. Location of shunts was divided into proximal and distal, and shunt patency, complications and limb viability were examined.

RESULTS

There were 126 extremity vascular injuries treated. Fifty-three (42%) had been operated on at forward locations and 30 of 53 (57%) had temporary shunts in place upon arrival to our facility. The patency for shunts in proximal vascular injuries was 86% (n = 22) compared with 12% (n = 8) for distal shunts (p < 0.05). All shunts placed in proximal venous injuries were patent (n = 4). Systemic heparin was not used and there were no shunt complications. All shunted injuries were reconstructed with vein in theater and early viability for extremities in which shunts were used was 92%.

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary vascular shunts are common in the management of wartime vascular injury. Shunts in proximal injuries including veins have high patency rates compared with those placed in distal injuries. This vascular adjunct represents a safe and effective damage control technique and is preferable to attempted reconstruction in austere conditions.

Blunt popliteal artery injury with complete lower limb ischemia: is routine use of temporary intraluminal arterial shunt justified?

OBJECTIVE

Complete lower limb ischemia as a result of blunt popliteal artery injury is associated with the highest morbidity and amputation rates among all of the peripheral vascular injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the possible benefits of routine use of a temporary intraluminal arterial shunt in patients with complete limb ischemia from blunt popliteal trauma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over 3 years seven blunt popliteal artery injuries with complete lower limb ischemia were managed with insertion of a shunt at the initial phase of the operation. Data from these procedures was analyzed and compared with retrospectively collected data for 10 injuries with complete ischemia treated without shunts during the preceding 5 years.

RESULTS

Mean injury severity score and mangled extremity severity score were 9.3 +/- 3.49 and 5.7 +/- 0.95, respectively, in the shunt group, and 9.9 +/- 3.57 and 5.9 +/- 0.56, respectively in the non-shunt group. Mean ischemic time was 244.3, 24.3, and 268.6 minutes, respectively, for preoperative, intraoperative, and total ischemic time in the shunt group, and 273, 56.5, and 329.5 minutes in the non-shunt group. The difference was significant for intraoperative (P <.001) and total (P <.05) ischemic time. In the entire group, 92.8% of patients with total ischemic time greater than 4 hours underwent fasciotomy, 100% required repeat operation, and 57.1% had complications and required fasciotomy wound debridement. All patients (100%) with ischemic time greater than 6 hours required amputation, compared with no patients with ischemic time less than 5 hours. One patient in the shunt group (14.3%) experienced one fasciotomy wound complication (11.1%), compared with seven patients in the non-shunt group (70%) had 8 complications (88.9%) (P <.05). Mean number of repeat operations was 0.8 +/- 1.06 in the shunt group, and 1.9 +/- 0.73 in the non-shunt group (P <.05). One patient in the shunt group (14.3%) required fasciotomy wound debridement, compared with seven patients in the non-shunt group (70%; P <.05). Mean hospital stay was 14.4 and 23 days, respectively, in the shunt and non-shunt groups (P <.05). Four limbs in the non-shunt group (40%) required amputation, compared with 100% limb salvage in the shunt group.

CONCLUSION

Temporary arterial shunting after blunt lower limb trauma significantly reduces total ischemic time, complications, repeat operations, amputation, and hospitalization. I recommend routine use of shunts in blunt popliteal artery injuries with complete lower limb ischemia.

Fractures with major vascular injuries from gunshot wounds: implications of surgical sequence

BACKGROUND

The sequence of surgical repair for penetrating extremity injuries requiring both vascular repair and fracture fixation is controversial. The optimal determination of repair order and its consequences is the purpose of this study.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 27 patients over a 10-year period requiring acute revascularization and fracture fixation for isolated gunshot wound injuries. Injuries to the brachial artery and the femoral and popliteal vessels with accompanying fractures requiring operative stabilization were considered. The Mangled Extremity Severity Score, surgical sequence, limb viability, fasciotomy, incidence of iatrogenic vascular repair disruption, and length of hospitalization were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 17 lower and 10 upper extremity injuries, with a mean Mangled Extremity Severity Score of 4.1. Fracture fixation preceded vascular repair in five cases, whereas revascularization preceded bone fixation in 22 cases. A temporary vascular shunt was used in 13 and definitive vascular repair with used in 9 patients. There were no cases of vascular repair, shunt disruption, or amputation after fracture fixation. Four of five (80%) patients with orthopedic fixation before revascularization required fasciotomies, whereas 8 of 22 (36%) patients with revascularization before fixation required fasciotomies, and this difference approached significance (p = 0.10). Patients with fasciotomies had a significantly longer mean length of hospitalization, 18.3 +/- 8.6 days compared with 10.8 +/- 8.1 days (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION For patients with combined injuries, priority should be given to revascularization before orthopedic fixation because of shorter hospitalization and a trend toward lower fasciotomy rates. Revascularization before fracture fixation did not result in iatrogenic disruption of the vascular repair.

Temporary intravascular shunt in complex extremity vascular injuries

BACKGROUND

Early revascularization of ischemic limbs is an important step in the management of complex extremity vascular injuries (CEVIs). We present our experience of using a temporary intravascular shunt (TIVS) in the management of patients with limb-threatening vascular injuries.

METHODS

Patients who had CEVIs at our institution from January 1996 to December 2000 were treated with early insertion of a TIVS at the initial phase of operations. The TIVSs were assembled from simple intravenous and extension tubes available in the operating room. Rigid stabilization of the injured bones and/or joints, debridement of the devitalized soft tissues, saphenous vein harvest for interposition grafts, and repair of any associated venous injuries were performed while the shunts were in place. Then, the shunts were removed and the injured arteries were repaired.

RESULTS

There were five men and two women in this series. The preoperative time ranged from 120 to 450 minutes (median, 390 minutes). All TIVSs were inserted within the initial 30 minutes of operation. The injured arteries were popliteal (five patients), common femoral (one patient), and brachial arteries (one patient). Three patients also had associated venous injuries (i.e., two popliteal veins and one common femoral vein). Six injured arteries were repaired with reversed saphenous vein grafts and one (popliteal artery) was repaired by end-to-end anastomosis. The shunt time ranged from 60 to 180 minutes (median, 120 minutes). One patient had a TIVS inserted into both injured popliteal artery and vein. The operative time ranged from 225 to 360 minutes (median, 285 minutes). No complications related to shunt insertion were observed and all limbs could be salvaged.

CONCLUSION

A self-constructed shunt is inexpensive, safe, and convenient to insert. Early revascularization of the injured limb with a TIVS can eliminate the adverse effects of prolonged ischemia and enables the surgeons to manage other associated injuries in an unhurried manner. We recommend early insertion of TIVSs in CEVIs.

Popliteal vascular injuries

Popliteal vascular injury remains one of the most difficult diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for trauma surgeons. Only with strict attention to rapid diagnosis; early surgical treatment with meticulous technical skill; and aggressive use of various adjunctive measures, such as completion arteriography, anticoagulation, fasciotomy, and proper prioritization of management of multiple injuries, can limb salvage be optimized.

An historical tour of vascular injury management: from its inception to the new millennium

Advances have been made in times of war. Lessons learned from these experiences should be studied in order to avoid the costly mistakes made previously. Fortunately, major conflicts have not been common recently. Therefore, military surgeons depend on the stable environment of civilian trauma and research to lead the way. Documentation and careful record keeping such as the Vietnam Vascular Registry are vital in assisting surgeons with lessons to be learned.

Prolonged use of intraluminal arterial shunts without systemic anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

Temporary arterial shunts maintain perfusion while surgeons postpone arterial repairs. The common indications are combined orthopedic and vascular injuries and damage control. The duration of patency and the need for systemic anticoagulation remain in question. We examined our experience for answers.

METHODS

We searched for patients who had temporary arterial shunts and collected the following: mechanism, artery injured, shunt time, blood loss and transfusions, injury severity score (ISS,) mangled extremity severity score (MESS,) and anticoagulation.

RESULTS

Of 19 patients, 10 had shunts for damage control (group 1,) and 9, for orthopedic/vascular injuries (group 2.) group 1 had significantly higher shunt time, mortality, ISS, and MESS. Shunt time ranged from 47 to 3,130 minutes (52 hours.) Two patients, 1 in each group, required amputations.

CONCLUSION

Temporary arterial shunts can be use for combined orthopedic and vascular injuries and for damage control. Shunts can stay open for 52 hours without systemic anticoagulation.