The utility of both muscle and fascia flaps in severe upper extremity trauma

A single-center retrospective comparison of muscle versus cutaneous free flaps for posterior elbow defect reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Comparative data on free flap outcomes for elbow defect reconstruction are still lacking. This study aimed to compare complication rates of free muscle flaps (MFs) versus cutaneous flaps (CFs) for posterior elbow reconstruction.

METHODS

In a single-center retrospective analysis, patients who underwent posterior elbow reconstruction with free MFs and CFs from 2000 to 2021 were analyzed. Retrospective chart review included patient demographics, operative details, and post-operative complications. Outcomes of interest that were compared included microvascular complications, partial or total flap necroses, wound dehiscence, hematoma or flap infection, and donor-site complications.

RESULTS

Sixty-six free flaps (CFs: n = 42; MFs: n = 24) were included, with a trend over time toward using CFs (64%). MFs were used for larger defects (CF: 175 ± 82 vs. MF: 212 ± 146 cm2; p = 0.13). Outcome analysis revealed an equal distribution of microvascular complications (10% vs. 13%; p = 0.7), partial flap necrosis (7% vs. 8%; p > 0.9), wound dehiscence (7% vs. 4%; p > 0.9), evacuation of hematoma (10% vs. 4%; p = 0.7), and infection (0% vs. 4%; p = 0.4). Total flap necrosis requiring additional flap surgery was necessary in one CF (2%) and in no MF (0%) (p > 0.9).

CONCLUSION

Surgical outcomes, flap necrosis rates, and microsurgical complications did not differ between CFs and MFs. Both flap types are safe and effective options. The free anterolateral thigh and latissimus dorsi flaps represent indispensable workhorses for the reconstruction of extensive elbow defects.

Optical coherence tomography for in vivo longitudinal monitoring of artificial dermal scaffold

OBJECTIVES

Artificial dermal scaffold (ADS) has undergone rapid development and been increasingly used for treating skin wound in clinics due to its good biocompatibility, controllable degradation, and low risk of disease infection. To obtain good treatment efficacy, ADS needs to be monitored longitudinally during the treatment process. For example, scaffold-tissue fit, cell in-growth, vascular regeneration, and scaffold degradation are the key properties to be inspected. However, to date, there are no effective, real-time, and noninvasive techniques to meet the requirement of the scaffold monitoring above.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we propose to use optical coherence tomography (OCT) to monitor ADS in vivo through three-dimensional imaging. A swept source OCT system with a handheld probe was developed for in vivo skin imaging. Moreover, a cell in-growth, vascular regeneration, and scaffold degradation rate (IRDR) was defined with the volume reduction rate of the scaffold's collagen sponge layer. To measure the IRDR, a semiautomatic image segmentation algorithm was designed based on U-Net to segment the collagen sponge layer of the scaffold from OCT images.

RESULTS

The results show that the scaffold-tissue fit can be clearly visualized under OCT imaging. The IRDR can be computed based on the volume of the segmented collagen sponge layer. It is observed that the IRDR appeared to a linear function of the time and in addition, the IRDR varied among different skin parts.

CONCLUSION

Overall, it can be concluded that OCT has a good potential to monitor ADS in vivo. This can help guide the clinicians to control the treatment with ADS to improve the therapy.

A Retrospective Comparative Functional and Aesthetic Outcome Study of Muscle versus Cutaneous Free Flaps for Distal Upper Extremity Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 Function and cosmesis are crucial in upper extremity reconstruction. Yet, there persists a lack of outcome evaluations, particularly regarding differences between free flap types.

METHODS

 In a single-center retrospective analysis, outcomes were compared between patients with cutaneous or muscle free flaps for distal upper extremity reconstruction between 2008 and 2018. The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand -Score, Michigan-Hand (MHQ), and Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Questionnaires were assessed, motor function was quantified, and self-reported measures of cosmesis were compared, including the Vancouver Scar-Scale (VSS), MHQ aesthetics-subscale (MAS), and Moscona's cosmetic validation-score (CVS).

RESULTS

 One-hundred forty-one cases were identified, with a shift toward cutaneous flaps over the study period. Muscle flaps were used for larger defects (251 vs. 142 cm², p = 0.008). Losses, thromboses, and donor-site complications were equally distributed. Partial necroses were more frequent in muscle flaps (11 vs. 1%, p = 0.015). Seventy patients with 53 cutaneous versus 17 muscle flaps were reexamined. There was no difference in the timing of flap coverage (after 16 vs. 15 days, p = 0.79), number of preceding (2 vs. 1.7, p = 0.95), or subsequent operations (19/53 vs. 5/17, p = 0.77). Patients with cutaneous flaps showed higher grip strength (25 vs. 17 kg, p = 0.046) and reported better hand function (MHQ: 58 vs. 47, p = 0.044) and general health (SF-36: 70 vs. 61, p = 0.040), as well as more favorable appearance (MAS: 71 vs. 57, p = 0.044, CVS: 77 vs. 72, p = 0.048), and scar burden (VSS: 0 vs. 3, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

 Cutaneous flaps yielded better motor function, self-perceived cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and quality of life in our cohort of distal upper extremity reconstructions.

Management of complex forearm defects: A multidisciplinary approach

Complex forearm defects with significant damage to, or loss of skin, tendon, muscle, bone and neurovascular structures represent a great challenge for surgeons. The management of such injuries, whether a result of trauma or tumor resection, is focused on preservation of the damaged limb and restoration of hand function. A multidisciplinary approach combining plastic and orthopedic surgical expertise in a coordinated team is proposed to address these challenging cases. The authors have laid emphasis on adequate debridement for wound bed preparation, bone stabilization and reconstruction for a stable bony framework, vascular repair for early revascularization, musculotendinous and nerve reconstruction as well as vascularized tissue coverage on a case-to-case basis to facilitate optimal functional recovery. They also maintain that besides expedient surgical treatment, early mobilization based on an individualized rehabilitation program as well as psychological and socio-professional supports are necessary means of achieving rapid and successful social integration.

Subacute reconstruction using flap transfer for complex defects of the upper extremity

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in microsurgical techniques of flap transfer, complex upper extremity trauma reconstruction remains a challenge for surgeons. This study aimed to present the outcomes in using flaps in the subacute reconstruction of complex upper extremity injuries.

METHODS

From July 2013 to December 2016, 35 patients ranging in age from 23 to 69 years with complicated upper extremity traumatic injuries were treated using flap reconstruction in subacute period. The number and causes of injury were 12 machine crush injuries, 18 machine strangulation injuries, two chainsaw accidents, two traffic accidents, and one incident of heavy bruising. Thirty-five patients underwent flap procedures, including 24 anterolateral thigh flaps (68.57%), five latissimus dorsi flaps (14.29%), and six lateral arm flaps (17.14%). Flap sizes ranged from 3 × 4 to 42 × 16 cm². The mean time of flap reconstruction was 14 days (range 5-29). During postoperative follow-up, flap appearance, sensory recovery, scarring and satisfaction were assessed.

RESULTS

The overall flap survival rate was 94.3%.Two flaps developed partial necrosis, both of which were later treated with skin grafting. Traumatic wound infections occurred in three patients. All upper limb injuries were completely covered. The follow-up periods ranged from 18 to 62 months with an average of 2.9 months. All skin flap textures were soft with varying degrees of pigmentation. Flap sensory recovery was S₁ in three cases, S₂ in eight cases, S₃ in 15 cases, and S₄ in nine cases. There were no donor site complications other than three cases with scar hyperplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

The severe upper limb soft tissue defects still achieved satisfactory function and appearance with negligible complications and low amputation rates during the subacute period.

Reconstruction of Upper Extremity Defects by Random Pedicle Abdominal Flaps: Is It Still a Valid Option?

Traumatic soft tissue defects of the hand and upper extremities are common and may be challenging to the reconstructive surgeon. Several reconstructive procedures such as use of local, regional, distant, and free flaps have been described. This study aimed to report the techniques, outcomes, and complications of pedicle abdominal flaps in reconstructing hand and upper extremity defects.

Anterolateral Thigh Flap-the Optimal Flap in Coverage of Severe Elbow Injuries

Introduction Traditionally, the latissimus dorsi muscle with or without skin paddle has been the flap of choice for coverage of elbow defects. The ALT flap has found application in elective upper limb defects on account of it's ability to be tailor made for individual defects. Our series of 10 cases shows the advantages of using this flap for acute trauma defects. Materials and Methods Consecutive 10 cases of severe elbow injuries, involving varying amounts of the lower arm and proximal forearm underwent debridement followed by coverage using the free anterolateral thigh flap. Nine of 10 arterial anastomosis were done end to side to the brachial artery and venous anastomosis to the veins accompanying the artery. Seven of these patients had long bone fractures and elbow dislocations, stabilised using external fixator. Four patients needed primary muscle or tendon repair and nerve repair or graft. Results There was 1 total flap loss, intraoperatively where a TFL flap had been used in a 71 year-old patient. Nine of 10 had successful wound coverage. Using Jupiter criteria, 2 had excellent, 3 had good, 3 had fair, and 1 had poor outcome. Conclusion This consecutive series of moderate and severe elbow injuries demonstrates that the ALT flap should be considered as the flap of first choice, specifically when there is a need.

Contralateral lumbo-umbilical flap: A versatile technique for volar finger coverage

Background:

While contemplating any difficult soft tissue reconstruction, patient comfort and compliance is of paramount importance. Reconstruction of the volar aspect of fingers and hand by the ipsilateral pedicled flaps (groin flap, abdominal flaps) is demanding as the flap inset is difficult for the surgeon and very uncomfortable for the patient. This often leads to flap complications. For the comfort of the patient, better compliance and ease of complete inset, we planned to manage soft tissue defects of the volar aspect of fingers and hand by a new contralateral pedicled lumbo-umbilical flap. This flap is based on the paraumbilical perforators of deep inferior epigastric artery.

Materials and Methods:

The contralateral pedicled lumbo-umbilical flap was used in eight patients with high-tension electrical burn injuries involving the volar aspect of fingers and hand. The patients were closely observed for first 6 weeks for any flap or donor site complications and then followed monthly to assess donor and recipient site characteristics for 6 months to 2 years.

Results and Conclusion:

Large flaps up to 8 cm × 16 cm were raised. All but one flaps survived completely. All patients were mobilised within 48 h and five were discharged in less than a week after initial inset. The flap is reliable, easy to harvest and easy to inset on the volar aspect of fingers. The arm is positioned in a very comfortable position. The main disadvantage, however, is a conspicuous abdominal scar.

A totally laparoscopic peritoneal free flap for reconstruction of hand

Management of defects on the hand and foot with exposed tendons remains a major challenge for plastic surgeons. Here, we present a case of hand reconstruction with a totally laparoscopic peritoneal flap. The anterior rectus sheath was preserved in situ. The peritoneal free flap supplied by peritoneal branches of the deep inferior epigastric artery was retrieved by laparoscopy to cover the soft tissue defect of the hand. The defect of the dorsal hand was 17 cm ×12 cm. The peritoneal flap measuring 22 cm × 15 cm survived completely without any complications. A following split-thickness skin graft offered the suc- cessful wound closure. Motor and sensory function improved gradually within the first year follow-up. The totally laparoscopic peritoneal free flap is a good choice for reconstruction of the soft tissue de- fects accompanied by exposed tendons on the hand and foot.

Maximizing Outcomes While Minimizing Morbidity: An Illustrated Case Review of Elbow Soft Tissue Reconstruction

Background. Injuries to the elbow have led to consequences varying from significant limitation in function to loss of the entire upper limb. Soft tissue reconstruction with durable and pliable coverage balanced with the ability to mobilize the joint early to optimize rehabilitation outcomes is paramount. Methods. Methods of flap reconstruction have evolved from local and pedicled flaps to perforator-based flaps and free tissue transfer. Here we performed a review of 20 patients who have undergone flap reconstruction of the elbow at our institution. Discussion. 20 consecutive patients were identified and included in this study. Flap types include local (n = 5), regional pedicled (n = 7), and free (n = 8) flaps. The average size of defect was 138 cm(2) (range 36-420 cm(2)). There were no flap failures in our series, and, at follow-up, the average range of movement of elbow flexion was 100°. Results. While the pedicled latissimus dorsi flap is the workhorse for elbow soft tissue coverage, advancements in microvascular knowledge and surgery have brought about great benefit, with the use of perforator flaps and free tissue transfer for wound coverage. Conclusion. We present here our case series on elbow reconstruction and an abbreviated algorithm on flap choice, highlighting our decision making process in the selection of safe flap choice for soft tissue elbow reconstruction.

The use of pedicled abdominal flaps for coverage of acute bilateral circumferential degloving injuries of the hand

Reconstruction of bilateral soft tissue defects in hand and distal third of the forearm, is a challenge for any reconstructive surgeon. When there is circumferential skin loss affecting the whole hand and fingers as in major degloving injuries, the extent of tissue required for reconstruction narrows down the choice of flaps. When the injury affects both hands the magnitude of the problem becomes compounded. There is no report in the literature of free skin flaps to cover circumferential degloving injuries in both hands. We are presenting the technical considerations and outcome of pedicled abdominal flaps used for immediate coverage of circumferential degloving injuries of both hands.

Approach to complex upper extremity injury: an algorithm

Patients with complex upper extremity injuries represent a unique subset of the trauma population. In addition to extensive soft tissue defects affecting the skin, bone, muscles and tendons, or the neurovasculature in various combinations, there is usually concomitant involvement of other body areas and organ systems with the potential for systemic compromise due to the underlying mechanism of injury and resultant sequelae. In turn, this has a direct impact on the definitive reconstructive plan. Accurate assessment and expedient treatment is thus necessary to achieve optimal surgical outcomes with the primary goal of limb salvage and functional restoration. Nonetheless, the characteristics of these injuries places such patients at an increased risk of complications ranging from limb ischemia, recalcitrant infections, failure of bony union, intractable pain, and most devastatingly, limb amputation. In this article, the authors present an algorithmic approach toward complex injuries of the upper extremity with due consideration for the various reconstructive modalities and timing of definitive wound closure for the best possible clinical outcomes.

Reconstruction of traumatic losses of substance at the elbow

Traumatic lesions at the elbow involving great loss of substance are uncommon, but represent a significant problem when such cases are referred to a trauma department. Most of these injuries may cause severe final functional impairment, thereby jeopardising future activities, particularly in cases where treatment was delayed or inappropriate. The timing and method of treatment are critical. The trauma may involve soft tissues only, or bone and joint, or several structures at the same time, which results in combined complex tissue defects. Each type of tissue loss should be managed by choosing the most suitable technique from the armamentarium of reconstructive surgery, taking into account different priorities and the optimum timing (immediate or delayed, one- or two-stages). The authors describe a spectrum of indications and techniques that can be useful tools in managing these injuries.

Tendon coverage using an artificial skin substitute

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue deficits associated with exposed tendon and absent paratenon pose difficult reconstructive problems due to tendon adhesions, poor range of motion, poor cosmesis, and donor site morbidity. Integra Bilayer Matrix Wound Dressing (Integra Lifesciences Corp Plainsboro, NJ) is a skin substitute widely used in reconstructive surgery, including the incidental coverage of tendons. However, Integra's post-operative functionality of the tendons has not been well documented. We report the results of using Integra for soft tissue reconstruction overlying tendons with loss of paratenon in upper and lower extremity soft tissue defects.

METHODS

Forty-two patients (35 men and 7 women) with exposed tendons due to trauma (37), cancer excision (2) or chronic wounds (3) were reconstructed using Integra. Results were compiled in a prospective manner, including age, gender, wound location, wound size, time to final closure, operative time, follow-up length, split-thickness skin graft percentage take and active post-operative range of motion. Likewise using Medline, a literature search of current surgical techniques for the treatment of exposed tendons and the results from the literature were compared with these study results.

RESULTS

All patients healed with an average split-thickness skin graft take rate of 92.5% ± 6.1 (range, 80-100%). The thirty-two patients not lost to follow-up achieved an average range of motion of 91.2% ± 6.5 (range, 80-100%).

CONCLUSION

Integra offers a convenient, efficient operative procedure with minimal morbidity, demonstrating good cosmesis and tendon function. Thus, Integra may offer an alternative option for immediate tendon coverage in both the upper and lower extremities.

The free lateral arm flap-a reliable option for reconstruction of the forearm and hand

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study was performed to verify the advantages and disadvantages of the free lateral arm flap for defect reconstruction of the forearm and hand.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2001 and 2010, 21 patients underwent defect coverage of the forearm and hand with the free lateral arm flap. The mean patient age was 48 years (17-78). The results concerning defect origin, flap size, pedicle length, operative time, revisions of the anastomoses or other complications, donor site morbidity, and length of hospital stay were evaluated.

RESULTS

The majority of defects were caused by infections or chronic wounds. The defects were localized at the forearm in 6 cases and at the hand in 15 cases. The flap width ranged from 3 to 8 cm, and the length was from 5 to 20 cm. All flaps survived. Only in one case, a revision of the anastomosis was necessary. Primary closure of the donor site was possible in all patients. No complications occurred during the healing procedure. The majority of the patients were satisfied with the aesthetic result at the recipient site as well as at the donor site.

CONCLUSION

The free lateral arm flap is a very reliable option for defect coverage at the forearm and hand for small and medium size defects. A satisfactory aesthetic appearance, an excellent tissue quality, and frequent primary donor site closure are great advantages for selecting this flap.

Use of the fix and flap approach to complex open elbow injury: the role of the free anterolateral thigh flap

Background

Complex elbow injuries with associated nerve, muscle, or joint injury commonly develop post-inury stiffness. In order to preserve function, joint congruency, elbow stability and durable wound coverage must be achieved in a timely manner.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who underwent orthopaedic fixation followed by free anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap soft tissue coverage was performed. Five patients were identified and included in this study.

Results

We present a series of 5 cases managed with this principle. Soft tissue defects ranged in size from 4×9 cm (36 cm²) to 15×30 cm (450 cm²) and were located either posteriorly (n=4) or anteriorly (n=1). Associated injuries included open fractures (n=3) and motor nerve transection (n=2). Wound coverage was achieved in a mean duration of 18.8 days (range, 11 to 42 day). There were no flap failures and no major complications. The mean postoperative active elbow motion was 102° (range, 45° to 140°).

Conclusions

In our small series we have highlighted the safety and utility of using the free ALT flap in complex elbow injuries. The ALT flap has many advantages which include abundant skin and subcutaneous tissue; vascularised vastus lateralis muscle that was used in our series to obliterate dead space, provide a vascular bed for nerve grafts and combat infection; and, access to fascia lata grafts for reconstruction of the triceps tendon.

The reconstruction of the mutilated hand

The challenging reconstructive treatment of defects in the upper extremity requires a sound working knowledge of a variety of flaps. As the hand surgeon weighs the pros and cons of each possible flap to obtain definitive closure, he or she must also integrate the priorities of function, contour, and stability as well as the anticipation of further reconstructive surgery in choosing the flap of choice. This review describes the various flaps available for closure of soft tissue defects of the upper extremity. The principles of management of wounds of the upper extremity is described to guide hand surgeons in the early treatment of massive wounds that will eventually need free tissue coverage. Currently used flaps include fasciocutaneous, fascial, musculocutaneous, muscle, and osteocutaneous flaps. Flap selection is based on the characteristics of the defect including size, shape, and location, the availability of donor sites, and the goals of reconstruction. Improved techniques of microsurgery and an ever increasing repertoire of flaps provide the framework for hand surgeons to offer the most appropriate flap based on donor site, thickness, amount of tissue needed, and composition. A discussion of the selection of ideal flaps for any given defect should enable the reconstructive hand surgeon to provide the most appropriate coverage of wounds to the hand and upper extremity.

[Fractures of the extremities with severe open soft tissue damage. Initial management and reconstructive treatment strategies]

The successful management of open extremity injuries continues to represent a surgical challenge requiring a structured and multidisciplinary treatment concept. The treatment strategy depends on specific parameters, including the overall injury severity, life threatening trauma components, the degree oft soft tissue injury, the ischemia time, the contamination of the wound as well as the age and accompanying diseases of the patient. The treatment of fractures with a high-grade open soft tissue injury is guided by the severity of soft tissue damage including neurovascular damages, type of the fracture, overall state of the patient and is based on a clearly defined reconstructive algorithm sequentially employing initial wound treatment (debridement), stabilisation of the fracture and soft tissue coverage. The initial wound management includes radical and serial debridements and vessel reconstruction, followed by the gradual reconstruction of bone, tendons and nerves and a subsequent plastic soft tissue coverage.The sequential and priority-orientated implementation of these treatment steps is decisive for the long term outcome, which ideally results in an regular healing of bone and soft tissue without the presence of infection and good regain of extremity function.

[Management of severe soft-tissue trauma in the upper extremity - shoulder, upper and lower arm]

OBJECTIVE

Salvage of the respective extremity. Standardized approach to adequate soft-tissue coverage (isolated severe soft-tissue trauma) and preconditioning for fracture healing (in complex trauma) as a basis for functional restoration. Limitation of secondary soft-tissue loss. Prevention of infection.

INDICATIONS

Isolated extended severe soft-tissue trauma (crush trauma, degloving injury) in the region of the shoulder and the upper extremity. Complex trauma with soft-tissue involvement Gustilo IIIB/C or Tscherne GIII/IV. Segmental soft-tissue/bone loss. Subtotal or partial amputations.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Unstable polytraumatized patient with vital hazards and the priority for lifesaving measures. Irretrievable devascularization or unreconstructable neural destruction, extended severe loss of multiple muscular units.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Systematic, eventually serial debridement, temporary joint transfixation, reconstruction of macrocirculation, dermatofasciotomy in compartment syndrome, preferably primary shortening in segmental soft-tissue/bone loss, temporary soft-tissue coverage, systematic conditioning of soft tissues, postprimary or secondary soft-tissue reconstruction, secondary change to preferably internal fixation techniques.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Individualized earliest possible passive or assisted mobilization of nontransfixed joints, early removal of transfixation and change to internal fixation modes, eventually secondary reconstructive measures (e.g., augmentation of bone defects, flap correction, secondary nerve reconstruction, functional muscle transposition procedures, arthrolyses).

RESULTS

Patency rate after vascular reconstruction > 90%, flap survival > 95%, need for amputation is a rare entity; main determinants of prognosis: severity of soft-tissue trauma, neural damage, and potential for reconstruction.

Comparison of the vascularity of fasciocutaneous tissue and muscle for coverage of open tibial fractures

BACKGROUND

Early coverage with vascularized soft-tissue flaps has dramatically improved the outcome in open tibial fractures. However, the ideal tissue for covering open fractures remains controversial. Several clinical studies suggest that muscle is superior to fasciocutaneous tissue; this is attributed to the presumed higher vascularity of muscle, although experimental evidence is inconclusive. The authors' previously described novel murine fracture model, which allows exclusive comparison of both tissues, demonstrated enhanced healing beneath muscle. The present study was undertaken to compare the vascularity of muscle and fasciocutaneous tissues over the course of fracture healing.

METHODS

Two experimental groups comprised mice with tibial fractures in contact with either muscle or fasciocutaneous tissues exclusively. Controls included a nontrauma group and those where soft tissues and periosteum were dissected but the tibia was not fractured. Animals were harvested between 3 and 28 days after fracture (n = 170 in total). The vascular density of the soft tissues was assessed using immunohistochemical techniques.

RESULTS

Fasciocutaneous tissue was found to have a higher vascular density compared with muscle in contact with the fracture site at all time points (p < 0.0001, two-way analysis of variance), despite accelerated healing of fractures covered by muscle.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' data show that the more advanced healing of fractures covered by muscle compared with fasciocutaneous tissue is not related to the vascularity of the tissues, as the latter had a higher vascular density at all time points. Therefore, provided that a flap has sufficient vascularity to effectively reconstitute the soft-tissue envelope, other factors may be important in specifically promoting fracture healing.

A buried interpolated local fasciocutaneous flap for tension-free closure of the chronic olecranon wound

Chronic olecranon wounds, in spite of their diminutive size, can truly be a big nuisance in any attempt to heal them without resorting to some form of vascularized flap. Although nearby pedicled skin flaps or even free flaps can suffice, local fasciocutaneous flaps based solely on the existing regional fascial plexus are much simpler and just as reliable. An improvement of this concept is the buried interpolated fasciocutaneous flap that brings adjacent, supple forearm tissues into the defect. Unlike a more conventional interpolation flap that is brought over normal tissues, by instead burying a deepithelialized portion of this flap underneath any intervening tissues will allow in a single stage the replacement of missing tissues in a relatively tension-free manner. Over the past year, this maneuver in 4 patients has proven to be a satisfactory outpatient procedure with rapid healing, minimal complications, and ultimately full restoration of elbow motion.

Preservation of hand function using muscle perforator flaps

Adequate soft tissue coverage is imperative after any interventions performed to maximize or preserve hand function. Although this can most simply be achieved by primary closure or a skin graft if possible, often a vascularized flap will be preferable, especially if a later secondary procedure is planned. Even moderately sized skin deficits of the upper extremity, and especially if involving the hand itself, can be better covered using a free tissue transfer. Many reasonable options in this regard are available. Muscle perforator flaps, as a relatively new variant of a fasciocutaneous flap, have unique attributes, including availability, diversity, accessibility, large size, and lengthy vascular pedicle, and since no muscle need be included, donor site function is preserved. As is shown here in a series of nine muscle perforator flaps in eight patients, these represent yet another alternative that should be considered if selection of a free flap is indicated to maintain hand function.

Soft tissue coverage of the elbow: a reconstructive algorithm

Soft tissue defects can occur for various reasons, but they are primarily due to trauma, tumor, and infection. Coverage choices may include primary closure, skin grafting, local cutaneous flaps, fasciocutaneous transposition flaps, island fascial or fasciocutaneous flaps, muscle or myocutaneous pedicled flaps, and microvascular free-tissue transfer. Despite the multitude of options for coverage, the authors have found four flaps to provide reliable coverage for most elbow deficits within their practice; these flaps are the latissimus dorsi flap, the radial forearm flap, the anconeus flap, and the free anterior lateral thigh flap. This article provides an overview of treatment options for elbow coverage, with specific emphasis on the use of these four specific flaps.

Distally Based Posterior Interosseous Flap

A series of 15 consecutive patients with various hand defects requiring flap coverage was reviewed in this study. The defects were all covered with the distally based posterior interosseous flap. Its main indications were in complex hand trauma, severe burn injury, or skin cancer ablation, either acute or postprimary. In 12 of the patients, flaps survived completely. In 3 patients, there was partial necrosis of the distal part of the flap, which did not require additional surgical procedure. Radial nerve palsy was noted in one of the cases, with a complete recovery after 3 months. Donor site was closed directly in up to 4-cm-wide flaps, while larger flaps required skin grafting. No major anatomic variation was observed. Distally based posterior interosseous flap is a reliable choice for various types and areas of hand defects, with very low donor-site morbidity, and should be more commonly considered in clinical practice.

Soft-Tissue Coverage of the Elbow: An Outcome Analysis and Reconstructive Algorithm

BACKGROUND

Soft-tissue defects surrounding the elbow can be a challenging problem for the reconstructive surgeon. Multiple reconstructive options are available, but there are few published outcome studies. The authors performed an outcome analysis of soft-tissue coverage for elbow defects to determine the benefits and limitations of various reconstructive options in this problematic area.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all elbow defects requiring flap coverage from 1988 to 2005. Patient demographics, defect characteristics, type of flaps used, complications, and long-term outcomes were analyzed. The t test was used for statistical comparison.

RESULTS

A total of 99 flaps were performed in 96 patients. Forty-seven percent of the defects were secondary to trauma. Sixty-six percent of the flaps used were pedicled flaps and 19 percent were free flaps. The most common pedicled flap used was the radial forearm flap, whereas the most commonly used free flap was the latissimus dorsi muscle flap. Reconstructive failures occurred in 10 percent of patients; these 10 patients required a second flap for limb salvage. The pedicled latissimus dorsi muscle flap had the highest complication rate (57 percent), with distal necrosis being the most frequent complication. The pedicled latissimus dorsi flap was associated with a higher complication rate when compared with the radial forearm flap (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The pedicled latissimus was associated with a high rate of distal necrosis when it was used to cover defects distal to the olecranon. The authors recommend the use of the radial forearm flap or a free flap for soft-tissue coverage of defects lying over the proximal ulna.

Funktionelle und ästhetische Gesichtspunkte bei der Defektdeckung der Streckseite an Hand und distalem Unterarm mit freien Lappenplastiken

INTRODUCTION

Free coverage of exposed functional structures of the hand and distal forearm can be achieved using a variety of free flaps. However, there is a lack of data in the literature which tissue components are best used for defect coverage of this specific area regarding aspects such as tendon gliding and tissue elasticity. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare and to evaluate the functional and aesthetical results using free cutaneous, fascial and muscle flaps.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1994 and 2002, a total of 56 patients underwent free flap coverage at the dorsal side of the hand and forearm at our institution. Of these patients, 20 with 21 free flaps met the study criteria and were available for follow-up examination. Depending on the tissue component used patients were allocated into three different groups. In group 1 eight patients received a fascial flap, in group 2 eight a cutaneous flap and in group 3 five a muscle flap. The mean follow-up was 50 months (range: 4-103 months). At follow-up examination the patients answered the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ 8) and the DASH questionnaire.

RESULTS

Regarding range of motion of the wrist and fingers, fascial flaps clearly showed the best results. Concerning grip strength and pinch grip, fascial and cutaneous flaps demonstrated the same results. Patients with cutaneous flaps showed the best DASH score. Regarding the overall aesthetical outcome, fascial and cutaneous flaps were far better than muscle flaps. Donor site morbidity was lowest for fascial flaps followed by muscle flaps and was highest for cutaneous flaps.

CONCLUSION

Cutaneous and fascial flaps had the best functional and aesthetical results. Fascial flaps achieved the best aesthetical outcome of the donor site. We recommend free fascial flaps and cutaneous flaps as the first choice due to their advantages in the specific area of the dorsal site of the hand and distal forearm which requires pliable and thin tissue coverage.

Reconstruction of deep cubital fossa defects with exposure of brachial artery due to high tension electrical burns and treatment algorithm

In this paper, we selected eight patients who had cubital fossa electrical burns with exposure or damage of the brachial artery, during the period 2000 to 2004 and formulated an algorithm to salvage upper limbs. We demonstrated the effectiveness of the algorithm to rescue the extremity from amputation and to restore the functional ability combined with coverage of the defects. After initial management with decompression and debridement of the nonviable tissues surrounding the brachial artery, we used local fasciocutaneous flaps or pedicled latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle/musculocutaneous flaps immediately to cover and also to avoid the perforation of this artery with a mean of 5.5 operations and with an amputation rate of 12.5%. When perforation or necrotic focus was seen on the arterial wall without viable tissue around the brachial artery, circulation was restored with vein grafts. Deep defects in the cubital fossa with exposure of the brachial artery should be covered with well-vascularized tissue as soon as possible after serial debridements. If the necrotic focus is seen on the wall of the artery, it often requires a venous graft with flap coverage. In the presence of viable tissue around the artery, however, fasciocutaneous flaps are useful and they reduce the operation time and duration of hospital stay. We treated deep defects with exposure of the brachial artery in the cubital fossa according to our established algorithm. Adherence to this approach precluded dilemmas in the selection of flap types for the management of bulky tissue defects.

A Clinical Experience with Perforator Flaps in the Coverage of Extensive Defects of the Upper Extremity

Traditional skin free flaps, such as radial arm, lateral arm, and scapular flaps, are rarely sufficient to cover large skin defects of the upper extremity because of the limitation of primary closure at the donor site. Muscle or musculocutaneous flaps have been used more for these defects. However, they preclude a sacrifice of a large amount of muscle tissue with the subsequent donor-site morbidity. Perforator or combined flaps are better alternatives to cover large defects. The use of a muscle as part of a combined flap is limited to very specific indications, and the amount of muscle required is restricted to the minimum to decrease the donor-site morbidity. The authors present a series of 12 patients with extensive defects of the upper extremity who were treated between December of 1999 and March of 2002. The mean defect was 21 x 11 cm in size. Perforator flaps (five thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps and four deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps) were used in seven patients. Combined flaps, which were a combination of two different types of tissue based on a single pedicle, were needed in five patients (scapular skin flap with a thoracodorsal artery perforator flap in one patient and a thoracodorsal artery perforator flap with a split latissimus dorsi muscle in four patients). In one case, immediate surgical defatting of a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap on a wrist was performed to immediately achieve thin coverage. The average operative time was 5 hours 20 minutes (range, 3 to 7 hours). All but one flap, in which the cutaneous part of a combined flap necrosed because of a postoperative hematoma, survived completely. Adequate coverage and complete wound healing were obtained in all cases. Perforator flaps can be used successfully to cover a large defect in an extremity with minimal donor-site morbidity. Combined flaps provide a large amount of tissue, a wide range of mobility, and easy shaping, modeling, and defatting.

Aesthetic and functional considerations in the reconstruction of large skin defects with free flaps

Free flaps can be used effectively in the primary reconstruction of large defects after resection of large tumors. The ultimate goal is radical excision of tumors and achievement of primary wound healing with a single procedure and long-term local control of disease. Although this can be obtained with the use of free tissue transfer, patients often seek more aesthetic results. Therefore, refinements of reconstructive techniques with minimal functional donor site morbidity are now the gold standard in our practice.