Fluid resuscitation-induced cardiac tamponade

A rare case of cardiac tamponade masquerading as acute abdomen

•

Acute abdomen is any acute abdominal condition requiring a quick response.

•

The abdominal discomfort associated with extra-abdominal pathologies could mimic acute abdomen.

•

Cardiac tamponade is a medical emergency.

•

The differential diagnosis could be kept in mind to avoid a delayed treatment.

Introduction

Acute abdomen is any acute abdominal condition requiring a quick response. The incidence varies according to age and disease aetiology. The abdominal discomfort associated with extra-abdominal pathophysiology and thoracic conditions could mimic acute abdomen. In this case we report a rare case of a young patient with cardiac tamponade masquerading as acute abdomen.

Presentation of case

A 25-years-old African man presented to the Emergency Department with abdominal pain. An EKG was performed, which revealed sinus tachycardia, with electrical alternans and borderline reduced voltage. At the time of the admission to our unit, he had a clinical worsening and a CT scan of abdomen was performed, which demonstrated hepatomegaly, abundant pericardial effusion and thin right pleural effusion at the lung bases. An echocardiogram confirmed a circumferential pericardial effusion with initial collapse of the right ventricular free wall. It was decided to immediately transport the patient to the Cardiosurgery Unit of another hospital to undergo pericardiocentesis.

Discussion

Our experience with this case underlines the important point that patients with a large pericardial effusion may present with the clinical features of acute abdomen and peritonitis. Abdominal pain was the primary symptom that prompted this patient to seek medical attention.

Conclusion

Acute abdomen is any acute abdominal condition requiring a rapid, often surgical, treatment. Cardiac tamponade is a medical emergency. The differential diagnosis could be kept in mind by any emergency physician, surgeon and anaesthesiologist, because an incorrect diagnosis and therefore an incorrect treatment or a delay in pericardial evacuation can be life-threatening.

Cardiac impalement injury by a steel rebar: A case report

•

Cardiac impalement injuries may be fatal.

•

We report a patient with cardiac injury due to penetration by a steel rebar.

•

The patient also sustained pulmonary injuries.

•

The steel rebar was pulled out gradually during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

•

CPB is an effective surgical treatment even if there is a risk of bleeding.

Introduction

Penetrating cardiac injury often occurs in South Korea. However, impalement injury of the heart with other organs is rare and fatal. We present a case of cardiac impalement injury by a steel rebar.

Presentation of case

A 38-year-old man was brought to the emergency room with a steel rebar of 45.5 cm in length in situ. Chest tomography revealed that the rebar had entered the thorax to the right diaphragm via the left shoulder while piercing the heart. The patient was immediately taken to the operating room for surgery without removing the bar. We were able to rescue the patient with an emergency operation wherein the bleeding site was treated by pulling the steel rebar out step-by-step while performing cardiopulmonary bypass.

Discussion

Early diagnosis and rapid surgery are important factors for patients with cardiac impalement injury. Haemostasis must be achieved patiently step- by- step without removing the foreign object at once. CPB is an appropriate treatment, even if there is a risk of bleeding.

Conclusion

This case highlights the importance of immediate surgical treatment for the survival of severe thoracic impalemant injury patients.

Acute serous tamponade after paraesophageal hernia repair reoperation

Cardiac tamponade is a common complication after cardiac surgery and is usually caused by bleeding or thrombus in the early postoperative period. Postoperative serous tamponade is more rare and usually of gradual onset. We report an unusual and life-threatening case of serous tamponade occurring on postoperative day 1 following a third-time paraesophageal hernia repair.

The Journey of Harmless Bullet: The Perioperative Care of Penetrating Cardiac Injury

Traumatic injuries to the heart contribute significantly to trauma are associated with high mortality. Cardiac gunshot wounds (GSW) are considered more lethal compared to other injuries and present several unique challenges to the anesthesia management and perioperative care. We are reporting a rare case of a trauma victim who survived a GSW to the heart. We will discuss the perioperative care of penetrating cardiac injuries, the role of the anesthesia team in resuscitation, safe anesthesia induction, cardiopulmonary bypass management, and the essential role of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram imaging.

Traumatic cardiac injury: Experience from a level-1 trauma centre

PURPOSE

Traumatic cardiac injury (TCI) is a challenge for trauma surgeons as it provides a short thera- peutic window and the management is often dictated by the underlying mechanism and hemodynamic status. The current study is to evaluate the factors influencing the outcome of TCI.

METHODS

Prospectively maintained database of TCI cases admitted at a Level-1 trauma center from July 2008 to June 2013 was retrospectively analyzed. Hospital records were reviewed and statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS version 15.

RESULTS

Out of 21 cases of TCI, 6 (28.6%) had isolated and 15 (71.4%) had associated injuries. Ratio be- tween blunt and penetrating injuries was 2:1 with male preponderance. Mean ISS was 31.95. Thirteen patients (62%) presented with features suggestive of shock. Cardiac tamponade was present in 12 (57%) cases and pericardiocentesis was done in only 6 cases of them. Overall 19 patients underwent surgery. Perioperatively 8 (38.1%) patients developed cardiac arrest and 7 developed cardiac arrhythmia. Overall survival rate was 71.4%. Mortality was related to cardiac arrest (p = 0.014), arrhythmia (p = 0.014), and hemorrhagic shock (p =0.04). The diagnostic accuracy of focused assessment by sonography in trauma (FAST) was 95.24%.

CONCLUSION

High index of clinical suspicion based on the mechanism of injury, meticulous examination by FAST and early intervention could improve the overall outcome.

Decreasing maintenance fluids in normotensive trauma patients may reduce intensive care unit stay and ventilator days

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to determine if excessive fluid administration is associated with a prolonged hospital course and worse outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In July 2013, all normotensive trauma patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) were administered crystalloids at 30 mL/h ("to keep open [TKO]") and were compared to patients admitted during the preceding 6 months who were placed on a rate between 125 mL/h to 150 mL/h (non-TKO). The primary outcomes were ICU, hospital, and ventilator days.

RESULTS

A total of 101 trauma patients met inclusion criteria: 56 (55.4%) in the TKO and 45 (44.6%) in the non-TKO group. Overall, the 2 groups were similar in regard to age, Injury Severity Score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV scores, and the need for mechanical ventilation. TKO had no effect on renal function compared to non-TKO with similarities in maximum hospital creatinine. TKO patients had lower ICU stay (2.7 ± 1.5 vs 4.1 ± 4.6 days; P = .03) and ventilator days (1.4 ± 0.5 vs 5.5 ± 4.8 days; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

A protocol that encourages admission basal fluid rate of TKO or 30 mL/h in normotensive trauma patients is safe, reduces fluid intake, and may be associated with a shorter intensive care unit course and fewer ventilator days.

Cardiac tamponade masquerading as gastritis: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade can develop in patients with virtually any condition that affects the pericardium. A high index of suspicion with proper diagnostic scheme can lessen the concomitant morbidity and mortality. Although cardiac tamponade mimics many medical conditions, internists and primary care physicians should be aware of the physiological and clinical aspects of the disease spectrum.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 31-year-old Caucasian man, with no significant past medical history, presented to our emergency room with acute upper abdominal heaviness of 2 hours' duration after drinking excessive amounts of alcohol in a short period of time (binge drinking). The coexistence of recent alcohol binge drinking and nonspecific abdominal complaints usually presume a diagnosis of gastritis in our daily encounters in the absence of hepatic, biliary or pancreatic derangements. We present a case in which the presenting abdominal pain turned out to be related to cardiac tamponade.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac tamponade is a sort of cardiogenic shock and is a medical emergency. Clinicians should understand the cardiac tamponade physiology, especially in cases without large pericardial effusion, and correlate the signs of clinical tamponade together with the echocardiographic findings. Drainage of cardiac tamponade is life-saving. A high index of suspicion with proper diagnostic arcades lessens the concomitant morbidity and mortality.

Pericardial tamponade caused by massive fluid resuscitation in a patient with pericardial effusion and end-stage renal disease -A case report-

Pericardial tamponade can lead to significant hemodynamic derangement including cardiac arrest. We experienced a case of pericardial tamponade in a patient with end-stage renal disease. Hemodynamic changes occurred by unexpectedly aggravated pericardial effusion during surgery for iatrogenic hemothorax. We quickly administered a large amount of fluids and blood products for massive bleeding and fluid deficit due to hemothorax. Pericardial effusion was worsened by massive fluid resuscitation, and thereby resulted in pericardial tamponade. Hemodynamic parameters improved just after pericardiocentesis, and the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit.

Fluid resuscitation: past, present, and the future

Hemorrhage remains a major cause of preventable death following both civilian and military trauma. The goals of resuscitation in the face of hemorrhagic shock are restoring end-organ perfusion and maintaining tissue oxygenation while attempting definitive control of bleeding. However, if not performed properly, resuscitation can actually exacerbate cellular injury caused by hemorrhagic shock, and the type of fluid used for resuscitation plays an important role in this injury pattern. This article reviews the historical development and scientific underpinnings of modern resuscitation techniques. We summarized data from a number of studies to illustrate the differential effects of commonly used resuscitation fluids, including isotonic crystalloids, natural and artificial colloids, hypertonic and hyperoncotic solutions, and artificial oxygen carriers, on cellular injury and how these relate to clinical practice. The data reveal that a uniformly safe, effective, and practical resuscitation fluid when blood products are unavailable and direct hemorrhage control is delayed has been elusive. Yet, it is logical to prevent this cellular injury through wiser resuscitation strategies than attempting immunomodulation after the damage has already occurred. Thus, we describe how some novel resuscitation strategies aimed at preventing or ameliorating cellular injury may become clinically available in the future.

[Cardiac arrest following blunt chest injury. Emergency thoracotomy without ifs or buts?]

In German-speaking countries, most serious thoracic injuries are attributable to the impact of blunt force; they are the second most frequent result of injury after head injury in polytrauma patients with multiple injuries. Almost one in every three polytraumatized patients with significant chest injury develops acute lung failure, and one in every four, acute circulatory failure. The acute circulatory arrest following serious chest injury involves a high mortality rate, and in most cases it reflects a tension pneumothorax, cardiac tamponade, or hemorrhagic shock resulting from injury to the heart or one of the large vessels close to it. Brisk drainage of tension pneumothorax and adequate volume restoration are therefore particularly important in resuscitation of multiply traumatized patients, as are rapid resuscitative thoracotomy to allow direct heart massage, drainage of pericardial tamponade, and control of hemorrhage. However the probability of survival described in the literature is very low for patients sustaining severe chest trauma with acute cardiac arrest. The case report presented here describes a female polytrauma patient who suffered an acute cardiac arrest following cardiac tamponade after admission in the emergency department and who survived without neurological deficits after an emergency thoracotomy. Selections from the topical literature can help the treating physician in the emergency department in making decisions on whether an emergency thoracotomy is indicated after a blunt chest injury and on the procedure itself.

Penetrating cardiac wounds: principles for surgical management

Stab wounds are the main type of penetrating cardiac injury in China and they have a fairly good prognosis when the patient receives expeditious and appropriate management. The objective of this study is to present the experience of managing the patients with penetrating cardiac injuries. A retrospective study involving 82 cases with penetrating wounds of the heart in the past 16 years was carried out. Stab wounds accounted for 86.58% of this series (71 of 82 patients). All 82 cases were treated operatively. The amount of preoperative infusion as fluid resuscitation for shock was less than 1,000 ml in 65.85% of the present study. Only in three patients was preoperative pericardiocentesis performed, yielding a false-negative result in one. Six patients sustaining cardiac arrest soon after arrival were subjected to emergency room thoracotomy (ERT), and five of them survived. The overall survival rate was 96.34%. One patient died of exsanguination due to injury of multiple chambers; of the remaining 2 deaths after operation 1 was associated with abdominal injuries and the other with failure of cerebral resuscitation. From the experience reported in this study, early establishment of diagnosis and prompt thoracotomy against time are the fundamental factors affecting the outcome of penetrating cardiac injuries. Preoperative massive transfusion and pericardiocentesis are not advocated.