The role of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in clinical stage B testis cancer: the Indiana University experience (1965 to 1989)

Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumours: outcomes and adjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To compare the outcomes and treatment burden of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pRPLND) alone versus pRPLND + adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with pathological stage II (PSII) non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of the Princess Margaret Cancer Center eTestes cancer database identified patients with PSII NSGCT after pRPLND between 1995 and 2020. The primary outcome was relapse-free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes included disease-specific survival (DSS), burden of relapse treatment, and factors associated with relapse.

RESULTS

A total of 109 PSII patients were included in the study. There were 96 patients treated with pRPLND alone and 13 treated with pRPLND + AC. The median follow-up was 61 months. The 5-year RFS was 72% for the pRPLND-only group vs 92% for the pRPLND + AC group (hazard ratio [HR] 4.372, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-32.36; P = 0.11). Within the pRPLND-only group the 5-year RFS differed by pN stage (pN1 = 94% vs pN2/N3 = 67%, P = 0.03). Despite a higher relapse rate within the pRPLND-only group, the DSS was similar at 5 years (98% pRPLND only vs 100% pRPLND + AC, P = 0.48). Only 24 (25%) of the patients in the pRPLND-only group required any subsequent chemotherapy. Despite achieving similar survival, the cumulative post-RPLND treatment burden was less for the pRPLND-only group than the pRPLND+AC group overall (average 1.23 vs 2.46 cycles of chemotherapy per patient in group).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients with PSII NSGCT treated with pRPLND alone do not experience a recurrence or require chemotherapy. Despite a lower relapse risk when AC is given, no difference in survival was seen but higher chemotherapy burden was entertained. AC may constitute overtreatment for most patients with PSII NSGCT treated with pRPLND.

Initial surveillance in men with marker negative clinical stage IIA non-seminomatous germ cell tumours

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether extended surveillance with repeated computed tomography (CT) scans for patients with clinical stage IIA (CS IIA; <2 cm abdominal node involvement) and negative markers (Mk-) non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCTs) can identify those with true CS I. To assess the rate of benign lymph nodes, teratoma, and viable cancer in retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) histopathology for patients with CS IIA Mk- NSGCT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Observational prospective population-based study of patients diagnosed 2008-2019 with CS IIA Mk- NSGCT in the Swedish and Norwegian Testicular Cancer Group (SWENOTECA) registry. Patients were managed with surveillance, with CT scans, and tumour markers every sixth week for a maximum of 18 weeks. Patients with radiological regression were treated as CS I, if progression with chemotherapy, and remaining CS IIA Mk- disease with RPLND. The end-point was the number and percentage of patients down-staged to CS I on surveillance and rate of RPLND histopathology presented as benign, teratoma, or viable cancer.

RESULTS

Overall, 126 patients with CS IIA Mk- NSGCT were included but 41 received therapy upfront. After surveillance for a median (range) of 6 (6-18) weeks, 23/85 (27%) patients were in true CS I and four (5%) progressed. Of the remaining 58 patients with lasting CS IIA Mk- NSGCT, 16 received chemotherapy and 42 underwent RPLND. The RPLND histopathology revealed benign lymph nodes in 11 (26%), teratoma in two (6%), and viable cancer in 29 (70%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance with repeated CT scans can identify patients in true CS I, thus avoiding overtreatment. The RPLND histopathology in patients with CS IIA Mk- NSGCT had a high rate of cancer and a low rate of teratoma.

Testicular cancer with small metastatic burden: optimal approach in 2024

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent advancements in the management of clinical stage II (CS II) testicular cancer have transformed it into a predominantly curable condition. This success in treatment advancements has markedly extended patient survival. However, these treatments carry risks and morbidities, which is important to consider given the disease's impact on young men and the emerging understanding of long-term treatment consequences.

RECENT FINDINGS

Emerging data support primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for select CS II seminoma patients, with similar short-term outcomes to chemotherapy but less treatment intensity. Recent studies have also challenged the reflexive use of adjuvant chemotherapy for pathologic node-positive disease, as growing evidence shows low relapse rates regardless of nodal stage. Furthermore, novel biomarkers like circulating serum microRNA-371a-3p levels can help predict the presence of viable germ cell tumor at time of RPLND.

SUMMARY

Advances in risk stratification and therapy enable personalized de-escalation approaches for oligometastatic testicular cancer, optimizing survivorship. Upfront RPLND, reassessing adjuvant systemic therapy for RPLND pN+ disease, and novel biomarkers will shape precision treatment to achieve high cure rates with excellent quality of life. Ongoing trials of reduced-intensity regimens, accurate prognostic models, improved surgical strategy, and emerging biomarkers represent the next frontier in tailored curative therapy.

Testicular Cancer Treatments and Sexuality: A Narrative Review

The incidence of testicular cancer (TC) has been rapidly increasing over the past years. Diagnosis and early treatment have shown good oncological control, guaranteeing the patient different treatment approaches according to histology and tumor stage. Currently, physicians usually prioritize oncological outcomes over sexual outcomes and quality of life, considering as a first aim the overall survival of the patients; however, differently from other neoplasms, quality of life is still strongly affected among TC patients, and sexual outcomes are frequently compromised after each TC treatment. Several studies have suggested that each treatment approach may be associated with sexual dysfunctions, including erectile dysfunction, ejaculatory disorders, fertility issues, and hormonal changes. Since testicular cancer patients are more frequently young men, the subject of this work is substantial and should be analyzed in detail to help specialists in the management of this disease. The aim of the current narrative review is to generally describe every treatment for TC, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, and to establish which sexual dysfunction may be specifically associated with each therapy.

Testicular Tumors

BACKGROUND

Germ-cell tumors of the testes are the most common type of malignant tumor in men aged 20 to 40. Their incidence in Germany is 10 per 100 000 men per year, with an estimated 4200 new cases annually.

METHODS

This selective review is based on the recommendations of the German clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up care of testicular germ-cell tumors, as well as on pertinent original articles and reviews.

RESULTS

The treatment of germ-cell tumors requires an interdisciplinary approach comprising resection of the affected testis followed by further steps that depend on the histological type and stage of the tumor, which may include active surveillance, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, further surgery, or some combination of these measures. Two-thirds of germ-cell tumors are diagnosed in clinical stage I, when they are still confined to the testis; one-third are already metastatic when diagnosed, with organ metastases in 10-15%. Stage-based multimodal treatment approaches are associated with cure rates of more than 99% for stage I tumors and 67-95% for advanced metastatic disease, depending on the degree of progression.

CONCLUSION

For patients with early-stage tumors, overtreatment should be avoided in order to minimize long-term sequelae. For those whose tumors are in advanced stages, it must be decided which patients should receive intensified treatment to optimize the outcome. Multimodal treatment approaches are associated with high cure rates even for patients with metastatic disease.

Treatment Outcomes for Men with Clinical Stage II Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumours Treated with Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Guidelines recommend primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as a treatment option for tumour marker-negative stage II nonseminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT).

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on oncological outcomes for men with stage II NSGCT treated with RPLND.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of studies describing clinicopathological outcomes following primary RPLND in stage II NSGCT was conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. Baseline data, perioperative and postoperative parameters, and oncological outcomes were collected.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

In total, 12 of 4387 studies were included, from which we collected data for 835 men. Among men with clinical stage II NSGCT, pathological stage II was confirmed in 615 of 790 patients (78%). Most studies administered adjuvant chemotherapy in cases with large lymph nodes, multiple affected lymph nodes, or persistently elevated tumour markers. Recurrence was observed in 12-40% of patients without adjuvant chemotherapy and 0-4% of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature describing RPLND in clinical stage II NSGCT is heterogeneous and no meta-analysis was possible, but RPLND can provide accurate staging and may be curative in selected patients.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed the literature to summarise results after surgical removal of enlarged lymph nodes in the back of the abdomen in men with testis cancer. This procedure provides accurate information on how far the cancer has spread and may provide a cure in selected patients.

Advances in diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer

Testicular cancer is a curable cancer. The success of physicians in curing the disease is underpinned by multidisciplinary advances. Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy and the refinement of post-chemotherapy surgical procedures and diagnostic strategies have greatly improved long term survival in most patients. Despite such excellent outcomes, several controversial dilemmas exist in the approaches to clinical stage I disease, salvage chemotherapy, post-chemotherapy surgical procedures, and implementing innovative imaging studies. Relapse after salvage chemotherapy has a poor prognosis and the optimal treatment is not apparent. Recent research has provided insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying cisplatin resistance. Phase 2 studies with targeted agents have failed to show adequate efficacy; however, our understanding of cisplatin resistant disease is rapidly expanding. This review summarizes recent advances and discusses relevant issues in the biology and management of testicular cancer.

Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Patients With Pathologic Stage II Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor-N1, N2, and N3 Disease: Is Adjuvant Chemotherapy Necessary?

PURPOSE

According to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) has been advocated after primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) to reduce the risk of relapse in pathologic nodal (pN) stage pN2 or pN3, whereas surveillance is preferred for pN1. We sought to explore the oncologic efficacy of primary RPLND alone for pathologic stage II in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs) to reduce overtreatment with chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with pathologic stage II NSGCT after primary RPLND between 2007 and 2017 were identified. Patients were excluded for elevated preoperative serum tumor markers, receipt of AC, or if pure teratoma or primitive neuroectodermal tumor elements were found in the retroperitoneal pathology.

RESULTS

We identified 117 patients with active NSGCT in the retroperitoneum after primary RPLND. We excluded seven patients who lacked meaningful follow-up and 13 patients who received AC. There were 97 patients treated with RPLND alone: 41 pN1, 46 pN2, and 10 pN3. In total, 77 of 97 patients had not recurred after a median follow-up time of 52 months. The 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 80.3%, and the 5-year RFS was 79%. No differences in RFS were noted among nodal stage-pN1, pN2, and pN3-on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Lymphovascular invasion in the orchiectomy specimen, a high-risk pathologic feature, was also predictive of recurrence after primary RPLND. All 20 patients who recurred were treated with first-line chemotherapy and remained continuously disease free.

CONCLUSION

Most men with pathologic stage II disease treated with surgery alone in our series never experienced a recurrence. We did not observe a difference in recurrences between patients with pN1 and pN2. The recommendation for AC for pN2 disease may be overtreatment in most patients.

Immediate severe hypersensitivity reaction to etoposide phosphate: Case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Hypersensitivity reactions from intravenous (IV) etoposide have been rarely reported, with these being seen more commonly with etoposide than with etoposide phosphate. This is generally explained by the need for polysorbate 80, a known cause of hypersensitivity, as a solubiliser, in the etoposide formulation.

CASE REPORT

We report a 22-year-old male, being treated with adjuvant BEP (bleomycin/etoposide phosphate/cisplatin) for a testicular germ cell tumour. Bleomycin and cisplatin were administered without incident. Within one minute of etoposide phosphate commencement he experienced a severe hypersensitivity reaction, consisting of widespread erythematous rash, facial swelling, and nausea. Observations included unrecordable blood pressure, tachycardia, hypoxia, and loss of consciousness, confirming a diagnosis of anaphylactic shock.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

Etoposide phosphate was ceased immediately. He was successfully managed with IV hydrocortisone, IV promethazine, intramuscular adrenaline, IV fluids and oxygen. Following admission for observation, significant improvement occurred over 48 h.

DISCUSSION

Hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide were first reported in the 1980s. Following reactions to etoposide, substituting etoposide phosphate into chemotherapy regimens has commonly allowed treatment to continue without incidence. Anaphylactic reactions to etoposide phosphate were first documented in 2012, with further cases reported subsequently. Unlike etoposide, etoposide phosphate is highly soluble in aqueous solutions and doesn't require adjuvants in the formulation. Hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide phosphate are therefore likely related to the etoposide drug molecule itself. Clinicians should be aware of this rare, but potentially life-threatening, toxicity when using etoposide-based treatments and have procedures in place to urgently manage any hypersensitivity reactions that may occur.

Case Report: Rare Presentation of Mixed Germ Cell Tumor in an Infant

The estimated incidence of pediatric testis tumor is 0.5-2.0 per 100,000 children, accounting for 1-2% of all pediatric tumors. Mixed germ cell tumors (MGCT) in prepubertal males are exceedingly rare, with only one previous case report found in the literature. We report a case of a MGCT in an infant. For prepubertal males, GCTs typically present with a painless scrotal mass, though trauma, testis torsion and hydrocele are also common presentations. Similar to such tumors in postpubertal males, ultrasonography, computed tomography, and tumor markers are integral to determine the best treatment. The patient described in this report presented with a painless scrotal mass. Following orchiectomy, the patient was found to have MGCT that was limited to the testis. With prudent management, these patients tend to have favorable prognoses.

Management of residual disease after chemotherapy in germ cell tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although testicular cancer remains a highly curable malignancy, challenges and uncertainty still remain in certain aspects of management. Residual disease after chemotherapy in patients with germ cell tumors (GCT) remains one of these challenges. We aim to highlight the recent literature on the management of residual disease after chemotherapy in GCT and the emerging innovations that may provide further guidance into this area.

RECENT FINDINGS

A subset of patients with GCT will have residual disease after chemotherapy, and management of these patients involves highly skilled multidisciplinary experts including medical oncologists, surgeons, radiologists, and pathologists. Management options depend on histologic subtype, either seminoma or nonseminoma, and involve size criteria, possible further imaging modalities, and tumor markers. Even with these tools at highly specialized expert centers, uncertainty in management remains, and recent literature has explored the use of newer biomarkers to aid in these cases.

SUMMARY

Postchemotherapy residual masses in GCT can prove to be complicated cases to manage. Balancing survival with quality of life outcomes is important and requires a multidisciplinary team experienced in treating GCT.

Testicular Cancer, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Testicular cancer is relatively uncommon and accounts for <1% of all male tumors. However, it is the most common solid tumor in men between the ages of 20 and 34 years, and the global incidence has been steadily rising over the past several decades. Several risk factors for testicular cancer have been identified, including personal or family history of testicular cancer and cryptorchidism. Testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) comprise 95% of malignant tumors arising in the testes and are categorized into 2 main histologic subtypes: seminoma and nonseminoma. Although nonseminoma is the more clinically aggressive tumor subtype, 5-year survival rates exceed 70% with current treatment options, even in patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Radical inguinal orchiectomy is the primary treatment for most patients with testicular GCTs. Postorchiectomy management is dictated by stage, histology, and risk classification; treatment options for nonseminoma include surveillance, systemic therapy, and nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Although rarely occurring, prognosis for patients with brain metastases remains poor, with >50% of patients dying within 1 year of diagnosis. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Testicular Cancer focuses on recommendations for the management of adult patients with nonseminomatous GCTs.

Primary Robot-assisted Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Men with Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor: Experience from a Multi-institutional Cohort

BACKGROUND

Primary robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RA-RPLND) for men with nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) is an alternative to open RPLND for stage I and select stage II patients.

OBJECTIVE

To report the complication rates and oncologic outcomes from a multi-institutional series, and to estimate reduction in chemotherapy by using upfront minimally invasive surgery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective chart review of men undergoing primary robot-assisted RPLND between 2014 and 2019 in five institutions by eight urologists experienced in testis cancer and robotic surgery.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Variables such as demographic and clinicopathologic information, operative parameters and complication rates, oncologic outcomes, sexual recovery, and hospital length of stay were collected. Descriptive statistics are presented.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Forty-nine patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 15.0 mo (interquartile range 6.5-29.1 mo). Median operative time was 288 min, estimated blood loss was 100 ml, and lymph node yield was 32. Median length of stay was 1 d. There were nine postoperative complications, 44% (4/9) of which were Clavien grade 1. There were no Clavien grade IV complications. Twenty-one patients had metastatic NSGCT (42.8%), of whom nine (18.4%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Four patients experienced recurrence (three out-of-field and one in-field recurrence). Limitations include the retrospective study design and various surgical techniques among surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary robot-assisted RPLND for NSGCT can be performed safely, with low complication rates and acceptable oncologic outcomes reducing the need for chemotherapy. For a population in which compliance with surveillance is typically challenging, robot-assisted RPLND may improve quality of care and outcomes for patients with NSGCT.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In experienced centers, robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection can be performed safely with similar oncologic outcomes to an open approach, while providing an option that may reduce the need for chemotherapy.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Etoposide Plus Cisplatin for Patients With Pathologic Stage II Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors

PURPOSE

The relapse rate after primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for patients with pathologic stage (PS) IIA nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs) is 10%-20% but increases to ≥ 50% for PS IIB disease. We report our experience with 2 cycles of adjuvant etoposide plus cisplatin (EP×2) after therapeutic primary RPLND.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients with PS II NSGCT seen at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from March 1989 to April 2016 and who were planned to receive EP×2 were included. Each cycle consisted of cisplatin 20 mg/m2 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5 at 21-day intervals. Demographic characteristics, histopathologic features, therapeutic and survival outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 156 patients, 30 (19%) had pathologic N1, 122 (78%) had pathologic N2 (pN2), and 4 (3%) had pathologic N3 (pN3) disease. The median number of involved lymph nodes was 3 (range, 1-37 nodes), and the median size of the largest involved node was 2.0 cm (range, 0.4-7.0 cm); extranodal extension was present in 69 patients (45%). Embryonal carcinoma was the most frequent RPLND histology, present in 143 patients (92%). One hundred fifty patients (96%) received EP×2, five received EP×1 and one received EP×4. With a median follow-up of 9 years, 2 patients (1.3%; 1 patient each with pN2 and pN3 disease) experienced relapse; both patients remain continuously disease free at more than 5 and 22 years after salvage chemotherapy. Three patients died, all unrelated to NSGCT, yielding 10-year disease-specific, relapse-free, and overall survival rates of 100%, 98%, and 99%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant EP×2 for PS II NSGCT is highly effective, has acceptable toxicity, and incurs less drug cost than 2 cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin. Inclusion of bleomycin in this setting is not necessary.

Current management and management controversies in early- and intermediate-stage of nonseminoma germ cell tumors

Early stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) remains a treatable disease, with stage I cancer specific survival exceeding 95%. Using a risk-adapted approach; active surveillance (AS), adjuvant chemotherapy, and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) all options for treatment; with surveillance being increasingly used. With persistently elevated markers (stage IS), chemotherapy remains the hallmark of treatment. Management of stage II NSGCT varies based on status of tumor markers. With negative markers, both induction chemotherapy and upfront RPLND remain options. Management of a residual mass <1 cm after chemotherapy remains controversial, with AS and nerve-sparing RPLND considered options. The development of miR-371a-3p microRNA shows promise a novel biomarker for testicular cancer (GCT). Despite controversies in management, cures for NSGCT are achievable in 95-99% of patients.

Current controversies on the role of lymphadenectomy for testicular cancer for the journal: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations for the special seminars section on the role of lymphadenectomy for urologic cancers

The role of surgery in the locoregional management of many solid tumors has long been established. For testicular cancer, the incorporation of lymphadenectomy has played an important part in generating long-term survival outcomes in excess of 90% for germ cell tumor patients. In this review, we address several clinical scenarios in which lymphadenectomy at times is underutilized, and others ill advised.

Germ Cell Testicular Tumors-Contemporary Diagnosis, Staging and Management of Localized and Advanced disease

Germ cell testicular tumors are the most commonly diagnosed cancer in young men, with cure rates exceeding 95%. Clinical stage 1 disease is the most common manifestation, with radical orchiectomy curing the majority of Clinical stage 1 patients, making active surveillance the treatment of choice, with a cancer specific survival nearing 100% and low relapse rates. However, in metastatic disease, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery are curative options. Chemotherapy remains the mainstay of therapy for advanced disease with surgical management of residual disease. Patients with advanced disease should be treated in high volume experienced academic centers with multidisciplinary teams. Research exploring refinement of diagnosis and treatment, and lowering treatment burden is underway.

Clinical Stage IIA-IIC Seminoma: Radiation Therapy versus Systemic Chemotherapy versus Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection

BACKGROUND

Clinical stage II (CSII) seminoma is defined by the presence of pure seminoma accompanied by retroperitoneal lymph node metastases. In patients with bulky disease (lymph nodes > 5 cm in diameter), platinum-based chemotherapy is the widely accepted standard of care. However, the optimal choice of treatment for CSIIA and IIB is more controversial.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search using the key words stage II seminoma, BEP (cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin), hockey-stick radiotherapy, dog-leg radiotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Most relevant publications were summarized for this review.

RESULTS

To date, no randomized trials have prospectively compared radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT) and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RLND) for CSII seminoma. Because of the predominantly retrospective analyses and only few prospective trials data interpretation is complex. In CSIIA with lymph nodes of < 2 cm, RT and CT seem to be equally effective, while in CSIIB, a decreased number of relapses were observed in CT-treated patients. In addition, RT seems to be associated with a higher incidence of long-term sequelae when compared with CT.

CONCLUSION

Prospective clinical trials are needed to systematically compare the different treatment modalities. De-escalation of treatment intensity without loss of efficacy is required to improve long-term outcome for this young patient population.

Robot-Assisted Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy in Testicular Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in testicular cancer is a documented treatment along with active surveillance and chemotherapy. This study aims to summarize the current evidence on the use of Robot-assisted RPLND (RARPLND) in comparison with the laparoscopic and open approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search was conducted in the existing literature focusing on reports with outcomes of RARPLND for stage I-IIB testicular tumor.

RESULTS

Eleven studies complied with the inclusion criteria, including 116 patients. The average follow-up of 21.2 months showed no retroperitoneal recurrence. The median lymph node yield was 22.3 and the overall positive rate was 26%. Complications were encountered in 8% of the patients. The robotic approach showed similar results to the laparoscopic approach and outperformed the open procedure in perioperative parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Relapse-free survival, nodal yield, and complication rates during RARPLND for clinical stage I-IIB are acceptable. Further studies are required to establish these findings and determine benefit from the use of robotic approach.

Modern Management of Testicular Cancer

Testicular cancer is a rare urological malignancy with high cure rate. The development of highly effective systemic treatment regimens along with advances in surgical treatment of advanced disease has led to continued improvement in outcomes. Patients with testicular cancer who are treated following the treatment guideline mostly achieved high quality of life and long-term survival. However, patients who were identified as having non-guideline directed care were at significantly higher risk of relapse. In this book chapter, we introduce in depth the modern management of testicular cancer, including diagnosis, staging and risk stratification, treatment strategies of seminoma and non-seminoma germ cell tumors, follow-up protocols, and salvage treatment for disease relapse. We also review new studies and updates on medical and surgical management of advanced testicular cancer.

Laparoscopic Surgery in Urologic Oncology

Background

Techniques in genitourinary oncologic surgery have evolved over the past several years, shifting from traditional open approaches toward minimally invasive routes by laparoscopy.

Methods

We reviewed the literature on laparoscopic surgery for genitourinary cancer, with emphasis on contemporary indications, complications, and oncologic outcome of laparoscopic surgery for urologic malignancies.

Results

All urologic oncology procedures have been performed laparoscopically. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is becoming the preferred approach for managing kidney cancer. The initial experience with nephroureterectomy is encouraging. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is rapidly becoming the standard in Europe and is the procedure of choice in many centers in the United States.

Conclusions

When following the open oncologic principles for the surgical treatment of malignancies, laparoscopy offers similar oncologic clinical outcomes, less morbidity, improved operative precision, and reduced convalescence time.

Serum Levels of MicroRNA371a-3p: A Highly Sensitive Tool for Diagnosing and Staging Testicular Germ Cell Tumours: A Clinical Case Series

INTRODUCTION

MicroRNA (miR)371a-3p was suggested to be a sensitive and specific new serum biomarker of germ cell tumours (GCTs); however, its clinical usefulness remains unproven.

PATIENTS, METHODS

In 312 consecutive cases with various testicular diseases, serum levels of miR371a-3p were measured. Measurement results became available only after completion of treatment. Five patients with testicular seminoma were selected for review because of unanticipated clinical courses.

RESULTS

In each two patients, elevated miR levels heralded undetected primary testicular GCT and metastases despite inconclusive radiological findings. In one case, a normal miR371a-3p level correctly pointed to the absence of metastases contrary to clinical assessment. In all cases, knowledge about the miR371a-3p levels would have altered the clinical management.

CONCLUSIONS

These cases highlight the exceptional usefulness of the new GCT biomarker. In contrast to classical markers, miR371a-3p can identify primary testicular GCT. The marker can aid in clinical decision making in cases with ambiguous clinical findings.

Saudi Oncology Society and Saudi Urology Association combined clinical management guidelines for testicular germ cell tumors

This is an update to the previously published Saudi guidelines for the evaluation, medical, and surgical management of patients diagnosed with testicular germ cell tumors. It is categorized according to the stage of the disease using the tumor-node-metastasis staging system 7(th) edition. The guidelines are presented with supporting evidence level, they are based on comprehensive literature review, several internationally recognized guidelines, and the collective expertise of the guidelines committee members (authors) who were selected by the Saudi Oncology Society and Saudi Urological Association. Considerations to the local availability of drugs, technology and expertise have been regarded. These guidelines should serve as a roadmap for the urologists, oncologists, general physicians, support groups, and health care policy makers in the management of patients diagnosed with testicular germ cell tumors.

Guidelines on Testicular Cancer: 2015 Update

CONTEXT

This is an update of the previous European Association of Urology testis cancer guidelines published in 2011, which included major changes in the diagnosis and treatment of germ cell tumours.

OBJECTIVE

To summarise latest developments in the treatment of this rare disease. Recommendations have been agreed within a multidisciplinary working group consisting of urologists, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A semi-structured literature search up to February 2015 was performed to update the recommendations. In addition, this document was subjected to double-blind peer review before publication.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

This publication focuses on the most important changes in treatment recommendations for clinical stage I disease and the updated recommendations for follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Most changes in the recommendations will lead to an overall reduction in treatment burden for patients with germ cell tumours. In advanced stages, treatment intensification is clearly defined to further improve overall survival rates.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This is an update of a previously published version of the European Association of Urology guidelines for testis cancer, and includes new recommendations for clinical stage I disease and revision of the follow-up recommendations. Patients should be fully informed of all the treatment options available to them.

Current urologic care for testicular germ cell tumors in pediatric and adolescent patients

Testicular germ cell tumors make up 0.5% of pediatric malignancies, and 14% of adolescent malignancies. Young boys have primarily pure teratoma and pure yolk sac histologies; however, adolescent histology is mostly mixed nonseminomatous germ cell tumor. Surgical excision of the primary tumor is the crux of treatment. Chemotherapy, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, and targeted treatment of distant metastases make even widely disseminated disease treatable. Since the discovery of platinum-based chemotherapy, testicular germ cell tumors are a highly curable disease. However, adolescents remain the group with the highest mortality. Focus has expanded beyond survival to emphasize quality of life issues when optimizing treatment algorithms.

Saudi oncology society and Saudi urology association combined clinical management guidelines for testicular germ cell tumors

In this report, updated guidelines for the evaluation, medical, and surgical management of germ cell tumor of testes are resented. They are categorized according the stage of the disease using the tumor-node-metastasis staging system 7(th) edition. The recommendations are presented with supporting level of evidence.

Management of clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors

Therapeutic options for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor include active surveillance, adjuvant chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) determines risk of recurrence, as those without LVI have 15% risk of relapse on surveillance while those with LVI have a 50% risk. This stratifies patients into high risk(LVI+) and low risk(LVI-) groups which direct treatment recommendations. Surveillance is preferred for those with low risk disease, and is an option for those with high risk disease, as at least half are over-treated with other options. Adjuvant chemotherapy is an option for all patients as it can eradicate micrometastatic disease and reduce recurrence by at least 90%. RPLND benefits patients with low volume retroperitoneal disease with a cure rate of RPLND alone at approximately 70%. All three treatment modalities have similar survival rates approaching 100% but differing potential morbidities, which, along with patient preferences and compliance, should guide treatment decisions.

[EAU guidelines on testicular cancer: 2011 update. European Association of Urology]

CONTEXT

On behalf of the European Association of Urology (EAU), guidelines for the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of testicular cancer were established.

OBJECTIVE

This article is a short version of the EAU testicular cancer guidelines and summarises the main conclusions from the guidelines on the management of testicular cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Guidelines were compiled by a multidisciplinary guidelines working group. A systematic review was carried out using Medline and Embase, also taking Cochrane evidence and data from the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group into consideration. A panel of experts weighted the references, and a level of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned.

RESULTS

There is a paucity of literature especially regarding longer term follow-up, and results from a number of ongoing trials are awaited. The choice of treatment centre is of the utmost importance, and treatment in reference centres within clinical trials, especially for poor-prognosis nonseminomatous germ cell tumours, provides better outcomes. For patients with clinical stage I seminoma, based on recently published data on long-term toxicity, adjuvant radiotherapy is no longer recommended as first-line adjuvant treatment. The TNM classification 2009 is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines contain information for the standardised management of patients with testicular cancer based on the latest scientific insights. Cure rates are generally excellent, but because testicular cancer mainly affects men in their third or fourth decade of life, treatment effects on fertility require careful counselling of patients, and treatment must be tailored taking individual circumstances and patient preferences into account.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Although testicular cancer has excellent cure rates, the choice of treatment centre is of the utmost importance. Expert centres achieve better results for both early stage testicular cancer (lower relapse rates) and overall survival (higher stages within clinical trials). For patients with clinical stage I seminoma, adjuvant radiotherapy is no longer recommended as first-line adjuvant treatment.

EAU guidelines on testicular cancer: 2011 update

CONTEXT

On behalf of the European Association of Urology (EAU), guidelines for the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of testicular cancer were established.

OBJECTIVE

This article is a short version of the EAU testicular cancer guidelines and summarises the main conclusions from the guidelines on the management of testicular cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Guidelines were compiled by a multidisciplinary guidelines working group. A systematic review was carried out using Medline and Embase, also taking Cochrane evidence and data from the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group into consideration. A panel of experts weighted the references, and a level of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned.

RESULTS

There is a paucity of literature especially regarding longer term follow-up, and results from a number of ongoing trials are awaited. The choice of treatment centre is of the utmost importance, and treatment in reference centres within clinical trials, especially for poor-prognosis nonseminomatous germ cell tumours, provides better outcomes. For patients with clinical stage I seminoma, based on recently published data on long-term toxicity, adjuvant radiotherapy is no longer recommended as first-line adjuvant treatment. The TNM classification 2009 is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines contain information for the standardised management of patients with testicular cancer based on the latest scientific insights. Cure rates are generally excellent, but because testicular cancer mainly affects men in their third or fourth decade of life, treatment effects on fertility require careful counselling of patients, and treatment must be tailored taking individual circumstances and patient preferences into account.

Saudi Oncology Society clinical management guidelines for testicular germ cell tumors

In this report, guidelines for the evaluation, medical and surgical management of testicular germ cell tumors is presented. It is categorized according to the stage of the disease using the tumor node metastasis staging system, 7th edition. The recommendations are presented with supporting level of evidence.

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in the management of low‐stage testicular cancer: Technique and results

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is still the most sensitive and specific method for detection of lymph node metastases of testicular cancer. Because of its invasiveness and morbidity the acceptance of open RPLND has decreased significantly resulting in a diagnostic deficit. To reduce morbidity and to increase the acceptance of RPLND, laparoscopy has been introduced. Meanwhile, clinical data with long-term follow-ups are available demonstrating the technical feasibility and oncological safety of laparoscopic RPLND. Studies comparing laparoscopy and open surgery could show advantages for the laparoscopic approach concerning blood loss, intraoperative complications and operative time. Antegrade ejaculation can be preserved in the majority of patients. In conclusion, laparoscopic RPLND is a safe method for the management of low-stage germ cell tumors with minimal invasiveness and excellent clinical results. With an increasing number of urologists trained in laparoscopy and an increasing number of published data, it may become a standard approach for low-stage nonseminomatous testicular cancer.

The prevalence and prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to report the prevalence and prognostic importance of lymph node metastasis in malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary (OGCT).

METHODS

Demographic and clinicopathologic information were abstracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) from 1988 to 2004. Patients with a histologic diagnosis of OGCT after surgical resection were included. The study population was divided into Cohort A (lymph node metastasis absent) and Cohort B (lymph node metastasis present). Statistical analysis using Fisher's Exact Test, Kaplan-Meier survival methods, and Cox regression proportional hazards were performed.

RESULTS

In 613 patients with lymphadenectomy, the prevalence of lymphnode metastasis was 18.1% (111/613). In dysgerminoma, malignant teratoma and mixed germ cell tumors including pure non-dysgerminoma histology, the lymphnode metastasis was present in 28%, 8% and 16% patients respectively (p<0.05). Age, race, grade and extent of lymph node dissection influenced lymph node involvement but this was statistically not significant. Five year survival in Cohort A was 95.7% compared to 82.8% in Cohort B (p<0.001). After controlling for age, race, stage, grade and histology, multivariate analysis revealed the presence of lymph node involvement as an independent predictor of poor survival with a hazards ratio of 2.87 (95% CI 1.439-5.725; p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of lymph node metastasis varies according to histology in OGCT and is an independent predictor of poor survival in these patients. These findings highlight the value of lymphadenectomy and may be helpful in creating risk stratification models for individualization of adjuvant therapies.

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: long-term oncologic outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was first described in 1992, and has become more commonly practiced at certain centers. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection may be less morbid than open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, but more costly. Controversy exists, however, regarding the oncologic adequacy of the procedure. The published literature regarding the oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is reviewed herein.

RECENT FINDINGS

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection has not been as widely adopted as other laparoscopic procedures for genitourinary malignancy. There have only been seven publications in the last 3 years, often coming from the same centers. Recently there has been a change in practice with a greater effort to perform therapeutic laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and not simply a staging procedure. Adjuvant chemotherapy is no longer routinely offered to all patients with positive nodes.

SUMMARY

The impressive cure rate and decreasing morbidity associated with conventional open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection are difficult to improve upon. While on par with open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection series, the current oncologic outcomes are difficult to attribute to successful laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection alone. Most patients with viable tumor in the retroperitoneal lymph node dissection specimen received chemotherapy. Thus, we must await follow-up of the patients who declined adjuvant chemotherapy after laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection or the results of more recent initiatives with laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection alone.

State-of-the-art surgical management of testicular tumors

Testicular cancer is the most common malignancy in men aged 20-35 years and accounts for approximately 1% of all male malignancies. Testicular cancer has a propensity to spread via the lymphatic system to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes, and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection remains an essential component in the cure of these patients. This review summarizes the basic principles of surgical management of germ cell tumors.

Nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy

Surgery for retroperitoneal nodal metastases of testicular germ-cell tumors has evolved considerably since its inception. Minimizing injury to sympathetic nerves has involved their exclusion from resection boundaries and/or "nerve sparing," by identifying and preserving nerves within the resection field. These measures improve long-term procedure-related morbidity with equivalent rates of cancer control. We believe that nerve-sparing techniques are the standard of care and enforce good principles of surgery by demanding attention to anatomy and exposure. Experience with this procedure, knowledge of retroperitoneal anatomy, and thoughtful clinical and surgical decision making are imperative to achieving acceptable results. It behooves urologic oncologists to offer patients maximal therapeutic benefit combined with minimal morbidity and that retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy should be nerve sparing by definition.

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors: current status

We review the published literature regarding the technical feasibility, oncologic outcomes, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (LRPLND). With proof that it is feasible, several centers have become expert in LRPLND and morbidity appears to be less than that of open RPLND. As the technique improves, it is likely that LRPLND will become equally if not more cost-effective than conventional RPLND. However, the oncologic outcomes, while on par with open RPLND series, are difficult to attribute to successful LRPLND alone when nearly all patients with positive lymph nodes received chemotherapy postoperatively. Although uncertainties exist, LRPLND holds much future promise.