Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Initial Experience and Comparison to the Open Surgical Approach

Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy in consecutive patients: the Cornell experience

OBJECTIVE

To compare a contemporary series of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) at one institution, to evaluate the size and types of tumour in each group and the early outcome after each procedure, as LPN is replacing open radical nephrectomy as the standard of care for uncomplicated renal tumours but partial nephrectomy remains significantly more difficult laparoscopically, especially if the goal is to duplicate the open surgical technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the records of all patients who underwent partial nephrectomy at our institution from January 2000 to April 2004, identifying 66 who had LPN and compared them with 59 who had OPN (mean age at LPN and OPN, 62.1 and 64.2 years, respectively; 70% men in each group). Variables analysed included operative time, blood loss, creatinine levels before and after partial nephrectomy, time to resuming clear liquids and regular diet, length of stay, tumour size, tumour pathological type and complications. Groups were compared using Student's t-test, with P < 0.05 taken to indicate significance.

RESULTS

Of those having LPN, 59% had right-sided tumours, vs 53% in the OPN group; the respective mean tumour size was 2.2 and 3.4 cm, the mean operative duration 144 and 239 min (both P < 0.001), and the mean estimated blood loss 236 and 363 mL (P = 0.09). Seven patients in the OPN group had obligatory partial nephrectomy for either a solitary kidney (two) or azotaemia (five). No patient in the LPN group required an obligatory partial nephrectomy. Serum creatinine levels were measured before and 1 and 2 days after surgery, and were 88, 88 and 97 micromol/L for the LPN group, and 97, 106 and 106 micromol/L for the OPN group. Clear fluids were started a mean of 41 h after surgery, a regular diet resumed 76 h after and discharge was 129 h after surgery in the OPN group; the respective values for the LPN group were 24 h (P = 0.01), 49 h (P = 0.2) and 82 h (P < 0.001). Complications were similar in both groups but the pathological subtypes differed.

CONCLUSIONS

LPN offers early functional advantages over OPN in terms of earlier resumption of diet and slightly earlier discharge. However, the two groups of patients were clearly not evenly matched for size nor pathological subtypes, with larger, malignant subtypes more predominant in the OPN group. These results suggest that while LPN is a safe, effective treatment for small renal tumours, obligatory partial nephrectomy or large tumours continue to be performed using open techniques with good results.

Role of laparoscopy in management of renal stones: single-center experience and review of literature

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Laparoscopy can be an alternative modality in the management of renal stones. We present our experience with laparoscopic renal stone surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients (4 males, 14 females) with mean age of 51 years (range 18-86 years) underwent 19 laparoscopic procedures. The mean stone number and size, excluding five patients who had nephrectomy/heminephrectomy, were 1.9 (range 1-5) and 1.3 cm (range 0.5-4.5 cm), respectively. Three patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction underwent pyeloplasty and concomitant pyelolithotomy. Three patients with upper-pole caliceal-diverticular stones had nephrolithotomy and fulguration of the diverticular mucosa. Three patients with stones and hydrocalix with scarred cortex had partial nephrectomy, two under cold and one under warm ischemia. Five patients, including one with a horseshoe kidney (who had one procedure on each kidney), had pyelolithotomy as an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Patients with stones in a nonfunctioning kidney underwent nephrectomy (three patients) or heminephrectomy (one patient).

RESULTS

All procedures were completed laparoscopically. The operative time was variable depending on the complexity of the procedures, from 115 minutes for Fengerplasty to 315 minutes for partial nephrectomy under cold ischemia (mean 178 minutes). The estimated blood loss was 53.2 mL (range 20-120 ml), and none of the patients received a blood transfusion. Complete stone clearance was achieved in 93% of the procedures. The mean hospital stay was 10.5 days (range 5-35 days). Three patients needed temporary pigtail-catheter drainage for obstruction after pyelolithotomy. One patient with a solitary kidney and infected staghorn calculus had prolonged urinary leak, which stopped with conservative management. One nephrectomy for nephrocutaneous fistula was complicated by a late colonic perforation necessitating colostomy.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic surgery is effective for complex renal stones and allows for adjunctive procedures. It can also be an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. It complements other minimally invasive procedures, and a need for open stone surgery should be rare in the future.

Application of the microwave tissue coagulator: is it beneficial to partial nephrectomy?

BACKGROUND/AIM

The indications of partial nephrectomy have expanded after the introduction of new techniques for preventing excessive blood loss and avoiding deterioration of the renal function after clamping the renal pedicle. We present our clinical experience of partial nephrectomy for renal tumors using a microwave tissue coagulator.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 1996 and January 2000, 34 patients underwent open partial nephrectomies in the Kobe City General Hospital. The microwave tissue coagulator was used for resection of the renal parenchyma, but in deeper lesions a sharp dissection was performed. Twenty-two patients (groups 1 and 2) underwent partial nephrectomy without vascular control (14 renal pedicles were not disturbed in group 1 patients, and 8 renal pedicles were dissected but not clamped in group 2 patients). Another 12 patients (group 3) underwent vascular control with ligation of the tumor-feeding segmental arteries before parenchymal resection. The patients of group 1 underwent wedge resections, while those of groups 2 and 3 underwent segmental or transverse partial nephrectomies.

RESULTS

Complete tumor resection was done in all 34 patients. In group 1, the microwave tissue coagulator was very effective to control the blood loss (mean 330 ml). In larger resections, this method only was inadequate to control the blood loss (mean 489 ml in group 2), so that we needed vascular control. However, despite vascular control, mean blood losses of about 943 ml because of deeper venous bleeding occurred in group 3, and, moreover, postoperative renal infarctions occurred in 2 patients. Other complications were urinary fistula formation in 16 patients (47%) and renal pelvic stenoses in 2 patients (5.8%). All of the urinary fistulas were easily repaired by simple suturing intraoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Especially in wedge resection, the microwave tissue coagulator achieved safe resection without vascular control which differs from other new techniques. However, in larger resections, a combination with other techniques may be necessary to decrease blood loss and the rate of complications.

Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma

Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) provides effective curative therapy for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma. In patients with imperative indications, it represents an alternative to renal replacement therapy. For selected patients with systemic comorbidities that threaten global renal function, NSS preserves unaffected nephrons with excellent cancer-specific survival. Elective partial nephrectomy for patients with a small (< or = 4 cm), unifocal tumor and a normal contralateral kidney is associated with a low risk (0%-3%) of local recurrence and cancer-specific survival rates of 90%-100%. Comparisons between radical and partial nephrectomy demonstrate equivalent cancer control over five years. Minimally invasive techniques of NSS are feasible but await improved technologies and long-term outcome data before they become fully acceptable treatment options.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The indications for partial nephrectomy are expanding as newer and more complete data come forth. A partial nephrectomy has traditionally required a generous flank incision. We report our experience using hand-assisted laparoscopy (HAL) as a less-invasive approach to partial nephrectomies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between October 1999 and May 2000, we performed 11 HAL partial nephrectomies. The average age of the patients was 55.7 years, the average body mass index was 25.6, and the average ASA class was 2.2. The indications for partial nephrectomy were enhancing solid renal lesions (N = 9) and nonfunctioning renal moiety in a duplicated system (N = 2). In the majority of cases, access to the renal pedicle was obtained prior to the partial nephrectomy. However, in no case did the renal artery or vein require occlusion. Several excisional techniques were employed, but all relied heavily on the Harmonic Scalpel in conjunction with the argon beam coagulator. Different hemostatic agents were applied to the renal defect, including Surgicel, Avitene, and fibrin-soaked Gelfoam activated by thrombin. In several instances, pledget reinforced sutures were placed in the renal capsule to aid with hemostasis.

RESULTS

The average operative time was 273 minutes, the estimated blood loss 319 mL, and the change in hematocrit 7.3 points. No patient required a transfusion, and there was one conversion to open. Postoperatively patients, required an average of 35.6 mg of morphine sulfate equivalent and 8.2 narcotic tablets, resumed oral intake in 1.7 days, and were discharged home in 3.3 days. There were no major complications and only two minor complications. Postoperatively, five lesions were found to be benign, four lesions were confirmed to be malignant, and two lesions were consistent with a nonfunctioning duplicated renal moiety. Specimen size averaged 180 cc, and the tumor diameter averaged 1.9 cm. There were no positive surgical margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is feasible and reproducible. The surgeon's hand in the operative field facilitates dissection, vascular control, hemostasis, and suturing. Further long-term and prospective studies are underway.

Utility of the harmonic scalpel for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) remains a technically challenging procedure largely because of the lack of methods for obtaining consistent parenchymal hemostasis. The objective of this study was to determine if the extent of resection influences the ability of the harmonic scalpel to achieve hemostasis and to define the cases in which the harmonic scalpel is appropriate for LPN. Thirty LPNs were performed in a 25-kg domestic pig model. The blunt blade of the laparoscopic harmonic scalpel (LaparoSonic Coagulating Shears; Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) at power level 5 was used to divide the parenchyma. Control of the renal hilar vessels was not obtained. Three standardized types of resections were performed: I = peripheral wedge biopsy; II = upper- or lower-pole nephrectomy; and III = heminephrectomy. Bleeding was graded on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = no hemostasis; 1 = steady bleeding; 2 = moderate bleeding; 3 = parenchymal oozing; and 4 = dry. Hemostasis grades of 2 or less were clinically significant bleeding necessitating supplemental coagulation. The mean hemostasis scores showed a significant (P < 0.02) trend toward inadequate hemostasis with increasing extent of resection: 3.3 for Type I, 3.0 for Type II, and 2.4 for Type III. The percent of kidneys with grade 2 bleeding or worse was 9% for Type I surgery, 25% for Type II, and 57% for Type III. Successful hemostasis with the harmonic scalpel correlates with the extent of parenchymal resection in the porcine model. Most wedge excisions can be done with the harmonic scalpel alone, whereas larger resections necessitate supplemental coagulation. On the basis of this study, heminephrectomies with the harmonic scalpel are not recommended because of the high incidence of significant hemorrhage.