LIMITED ROLE OF RADIONUCLIDE BONE SCINTIGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN ELEVATIONS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY:

Evaluation of [11C]-choline positron-emission/computed tomography in patients with increasing prostate-specific antigen levels after primary treatment for prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate [(11)C]-choline positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for detecting clinical recurrence after primary treatment for prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 50 patients with prostate cancer who had had initial therapy (radical prostatectomy in 40, external beam radiation in three and interstitial brachytherapy in seven) had PET/CT using [(11)C]-choline in the presence of an increased or increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. The mean (range) time to biochemical progression was 22 (2-136) months. Current PSA levels were determined in all patients at the time of examination. The results were correlated with the histopathology reports after targeted biopsy or surgery, and with the clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean (median, range) PSA level in patients with positive PET/CT was 3.62 (2.42, 0.5-13.1) ng/mL, and that in patients with a negative scan was 0.90 (0.95, 0.41-1.40) ng/mL. PET/CT was positive in seven of 13 patients with a PSA level of <1.5 ng/mL, and histology was positive in this group in nine. In 17 patients with PSA levels of 1.5-2.5 ng/mL PET/CT was positive in all and the histology was positive in 13; in 11 men with a PSA level of 2.5-5 ng/mL PET/CT was positive in all 11 and the histology was positive in 10; in nine men with PSA levels of >5 ng/mL PET/CT identified all as positive and the histology was positive in eight. The sensitivity at a PSA level of <2.5 ng/mL of PET/CT for detecting recurrence was 91% (95% confidence interval, 71-99%) with a specificity of 50% (16-84)%.

CONCLUSION

[(11)C]-choline PET/CT seems to be useful for re-staging prostate cancer after curative therapy and with increasing PSA levels; this was verified by histological examination. We recommend this method at PSA levels of <2.5 ng/mL.

Variables which might predict the response to salvage radiotherapy in chinese patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To evaluate the relationship between the variables and the outcomes of salvage radiotherapy (sRT) to find some predictors of sRT.

METHODS

The medical records of 56 patients receiving sRT for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) were available for retrospective review. sRT was defined as external beam radiotherapy for patients with a continuous increase in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >or=0.2 ng/ml after RP. Response was defined as achievement of a PSA nadir of <or=0.1 ng/ml.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period after sRT was 31.6 months. The predictors of response to sRT were PSA doubling time (PSADT) and seminal vesicle invasion. The median PSADT in responders was 6.5 months versus 4.0 months in non-responders (OR=1.66, p=0.006). The patients with a PSADT of >6 months were all responders. The response rate in patients with seminal vesicle invasion was 42.9% (6/14) versus 76.2% (32/42) in patients without seminal vesicle invasion (OR=0.119, p=0.015).

CONCLUSION

PSADT and the state of seminal vesicle invasion were good predictors of response to sRT. sRT was especially effective when the PSADT was >6 months and in patients without seminal vesicle invasion.

11C-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Prostate Cancer: Primary Staging and Recurrent Site Staging

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the usefulness of 11C-choline positron emission tomography (PET) for primary staging and re-staging of prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

11C-choline PET, a total of 22 scans, was performed on 13 patients with histologically proven prostate cancer in primary staging (n = 6) and recurrent site staging; following radical prostatectomy (n = 5) and following radiation therapy (n = 3). In 1 patient, 11C-choline PET was performed in both primary staging and re-staging. Also, 3 patients histologically proven to have no malignant prostate were included.

RESULTS

Because urinary 11C-choline activity was low, it did not interfere with the visualization of pelvic structures. 11C-choline PET visualized normal prostate with a mean SUV of 2.99 (range 2.27-3.68) and primary prostate cancer as a hot spot in 5/6 scans with a mean SUV of 4.21 (range 2.99-6.2). In re-staging, 11C-choline PET was true positive in 9/16 scans and true negative in 2/16 scans. 5/16 scans in 2 patients were false negative with negative conventional imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

In primary staging, 11C-choline PET may not be of use because of no reliable differential 11C-choline uptake of BPH and prostate cancer. On the other hand, 11C-choline PET may be of value in recurrent site staging and monitoring for the prostate cancer.

Radionuclide bone scintigraphy in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: when is it indicated?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of radionuclide bone scintigraphy following biochemical recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for localized prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 1197 patients undergoing RRP we identified those with biochemical recurrence and who had also had a bone scan. Biochemical recurrence was defined as a prostate specific antigen (PSA) level of > or = 0.4 ng/mL. Patients with indeterminate bone scan findings and those in whom the interval between the PSA test and the bone scan was >3 months were excluded. Patient age, PSA level and other relevant pathological details were recorded. Clinical symptoms at the time of bone scan, androgen deprivation after RRP, bone scintigram details and time to recurrence were documented.

RESULTS

Of the 1197 patients, 153 (12.8%) had a biochemical recurrence and 35 (23%) of these had a total of 44 bone scans taken over a mean (sd) follow-up of 70.4 (35.6) months; 34 (77%) bone scans were negative (group 1) and 10 (33%) positive (group 2). In group 1 the mean PSA at the bone scan was 5.2 ng/mL; 76% of the patients had a PSA of < 7 ng/mL. In group 2 the mean PSA at the bone scan was 30.7 ng/mL and all patients had a PSA of >7 ng/mL. The only significant difference between the groups was the PSA at the time of the bone scan (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Bone scintigraphy is a sensitive diagnostic tool for detecting prostate cancer metastases to bone. A bone scan in patients with a serum PSA of <7 ng/mL on biochemical recurrence after RRP is unlikely to be positive, whereas a PSA of > or = 20 ng/mL is. The presence of skeletal symptoms or a PSA level of >7 ng/mL should prompt the clinician to obtain a bone scintigram.