USE OF SECOND TREATMENT FOLLOWING DEFINITIVE LOCAL THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER: DATA FROM THE caPSURE DATABASE

EPM2A acts as a protective factor in prostate cancer, evidence from a real-world patient cohort

EPM2A encodes a dual specificity phosphatase and has been proven to be a potential biomarker in several cancers but has not been mentioned in prostate cancer (PCA). We investigated the prognostic and therapeutic value of EPM2A in PCA. The TCGA-PRAD cohort was collected to evaluate the differential expression, prognostic value, immunocyte infiltration and drug sensitivity of EPM2A in PCA. We constructed a nomogram model to predict the recurrence probability for PCA patients. Immunohistochemistry was used to validate the different transcript levels of EPM2A between tumor and normal tissues. A real-world AHMU-PC cohort was employed for validation. The results showed decreased expression of EPM2A in 95.65% of tumor tissues and was related to their prognosis, especially PCA (p = 0.008, HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.371–0.863). Further multiple analysis by adjusting clinical features revealed that EPM2A acted as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.014, HR = 0.589, 95% CI: 0.386–0.898). Pathway enrichment analysis showed variable signaling activation between high EPM2A expression patients (HEXP) and low EPM2A expression patients (LEXP). The HEXP group contained higher infiltration of immunocytes than the LEXP group, as well as high levels of PD-1, PD-L1 and PD-L2, while LEXP patients were more sensitive to cisplatin, paclitaxel and bicalutamide therapy. The nomogram containing the EPM2A group, T stage and Gleason score showed a preferable prognostic value (AUC = 0.755; Hosmer‒Lemeshow, p = 0.486). In validation, we confirmed the lower transcript level of EPM2A in PCA than in normal tissues (120.5 ± 2.159 vs. 138.3 ± 1.83, p = 0.035) and correlated it with the expression level of PD-1 (R = 0.283). Among the 66 patients from the AHMU-PC cohort, we further validated the function of EPM2A in PCA patients. HEXP patients had longer recurrence-free survival times (1207 ± 110 vs. 794.2 ± 97.02, p = 0.0063) and favorable prognoses (HR: 0.417, 95% CI: 0.195–0.894, p = 0.0245). Collectively, we identified the prognostic value of EPM2A in PCa via a bioinformatics method. Patients with higher EPM2A may be more sensitive to immunotherapy, and patients with lower EPM2A were more suitable for bicalutamide, cisplatin and paclitaxel therapy.

Long-Term PSA Control with Repeated Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in a Patient with Oligometastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies and main causes of cancer death in Western countries. In the presence of metastatic disease, systemic treatment remains the main clinical option. However, since the introduction of highly sensitive imaging techniques, a new clinical 'entity' of metastatic patients with a limited number of lesions has been defined: oligometastatic patients. In this patient group, the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or other local therapies against all active sites of disease revealed by 18F-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) could achieve sufficient prostate-specific antigen (PSA) control. However, a clear benefit of this procedure in terms of significant endpoints is yet to be demonstrated. This case report describes our experience with treating a castration-resistant PCa patient with 18F-choline PET/CT-guided SBRT. Because of the occurrence of 5 metachronous lesions over 4 years, the pattern of recurrence was defined by the local multidisciplinary team as oligometastatic disease, and the patient was treated with 5 courses of SBRT which yielded good PSA control. He started systemic therapy with abiraterone acetate almost 5 years after the diagnosis of recurrent PCa.

Contemporary use of hormonal therapy in prostate cancer: managing complications and addressing quality-of-life issues

While both short- and long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are effective for treating prostate cancer, with the clinical benefits patients can often have significant side-effects. It is important that these complications are recognized and managed appropriately so that adverse effects on the patient's quality of life (QoL) are minimized. The incidence of deaths from prostate cancer has decreased over the last decade, probably as a result of various factors including improved screening and diagnosis, improved treatments, and better risk assessment to help guide therapy. A meta-analysis of prostate cancer trials comparing the use of early vs late hormonal therapy found that 10-year overall survival increased by up to 20% between 1990 and 2000, and this was attributed to the earlier use of hormone therapy (HT) in these patients. Data from the USA Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor database also suggest a significant decrease in risk in the last two decades in the USA, with more patients being identified with low-risk disease at diagnosis. In addition, there has been an increase in recent years in the use of HT at all stages of prostate cancer. The extensive use of ADT has raised concerns about potential adverse effects. ADT might be associated with a range of adverse effects that vary in their degree of morbidity and effect on the patient's QoL. They include hot flashes, osteoporosis, loss of libido or impotence, and psychological effects, e.g. depression, memory difficulties or emotional lability. Effective strategies are available for managing the major side-effects of HT, but to many patients these unwanted effects are often less important than the benefits of treatment. An investigation of health-related QoL found that men with prostate cancer receiving ADT had a poorer QoL than those not receiving ADT, but the difference was less pronounced after controlling for comorbidities. Many new therapies are currently under investigation which aim to maximize the clinical effects of ADT while reducing the adverse effects.