Urinary Tract Infections:: What???s New?

Lower Levels of Urinary Nerve Growth Factor Might Predict Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Women

PURPOSE

To investigate the changes in urinary nerve growth factor (uNGF) levels after acute urinary tract infection (UTI) and to assess the role of uNGF in predicting UTI recurrence in women.

METHODS

Women with uncomplicated, symptomatic UTIs were enrolled. Cephalexin 500 mg (every 6 hours) was administered for 7-14 days to treat acute UTIs. Subsequently, the patients were randomized to receive either sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim 800 mg/160 mg daily at bedtime, or celecoxib 200 mg daily for 3 months and were monitored for up to 12 months. NGF levels in the urine were determined at baseline, 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the initiation of prophylactic therapy, and were compared between women with first-time UTIs and recurrent UTIs, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim and celecoxib-treated women, and no UTI recurrence and UTI recurrence that occurred during the follow-up period. Twenty women free of UTIs served as controls.

RESULTS

A total of 139 women with UTI and 20 controls were enrolled in the study, which included 50 women with a first-time UTI and 89 women with recurrent UTIs. Thirty-seven women completed the study. Women with recurrent UTIs (n=23) had a trend of lower uNGF levels than women with first-time UTIs (n=14). During follow-up, 9 women had UTI recurrence. The serial uNGF levels in women with UTI recurrence were significantly lower than those in women who did not have UTI recurrence during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The lower levels of uNGF in women with recurrent UTI and the incidence of UTI recurrence during follow-up suggest that lower uNGF might reflect the defective innate immunity in women with recurrent UTI.

Prulifloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infections

INTRODUCTION

The present study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 10-day regimen of prulifloxacin 600 mg once daily as compared to ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily in the treatment of patients with complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

257 patients (mean age +/- SD 62.3 +/- 16.5) were enrolled and orally treated with prulifloxacin (127 patients) or ciprofloxacin (130 patients). The study was designed as a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled clinical trial. The primary efficacy parameter was the eradication of infecting strains (<10(3) cfu/ml). The clinical outcome and tolerability were also assessed.

RESULTS

At baseline, the most common infecting strains were Escherichia coli (62.8%), Proteus mirabilis (7.1%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (4.1%). At the early follow-up, the rate of patients showing successful treatment was 90.8% in the prulifloxacin group, and 77.8% in the ciprofloxacin group (p = 0.008). A positive clinical outcome was observed in 94.8 and 93.3% of prulifloxacin- and ciprofloxacin-treated patients. Both drugs were well tolerated. Two patients dropped out for treatment-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The high urinary concentrations of prulifloxacin, combined with a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, allow its use in the empiric therapy of UTIs.