Extended Prostate Needle Biopsy Improves Concordance Of Gleason Grading Between Prostate Needle Biopsy And Radical Prostatectomy:

Risk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy

Accurate identification of prostate cancer Gleason grade group remains an important component of the initial management of clinically localized disease. However, Gleason score upgrading (GSU) from biopsy to radical prostatectomy can occur in up to a third of patients treated with surgery. Concern for disease undergrading remains a source of diagnostic uncertainty, contributing to both over-treatment of low-risk disease as well as under-treatment of higher-risk prostate cancer. This review examines the published literature concerning risk factors for GSU from time of biopsy to prostatectomy final pathology. Risk factors identified for Gleason upgrading include patient demographic and clinical factors including age, body mass index, race, prostate volume, and biomarker based assays, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, and testosterone values. In addition, prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings have also been associated with GSU. Biopsy-specific characteristics associated with GSU include lower number of biopsy cores and lack of targeted methodology, and possibly increasing percent biopsy core positivity. Recognition of risk factors for disease undergrading may prompt confirmatory testing including repeat sampling or imaging. Continued refinements in imaging guided biopsy techniques may also reduce sampling error contributing to undergrading.

When prostate cancer remains undetectable: The dilemma

Since the first report on the efficacy of sextant biopsy under transrectal ultrasound guidance, there have been many modifications related to the total number of cores and the localization of biopsies to improve the prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate. The 2010 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Early PCa Detection Guidelines noted the 12-core biopsy scheme as the standard. However, this extended biopsy scheme still fails to detect 20% of high-grade PCa that can be detected by detailed pathological evaluation of radical prostatectomy; therefore, there is need for saturation biopsies. The existence of suspicions of PCa after previous negative biopsy or biopsies represents a valid indication for saturation biopsy. There has been no significant increment in morbidity or in insignificant PCa detection rates when a saturation biopsy scheme was used with an extended biopsy scheme. Along with the improvement in the PCa detection rate, accurate oncological mapping of PCa is another important consideration of saturation biopsies. The ideal number of cores and the diagnostic value of saturation biopsy after the failure of initial therapy are some of the issues that need to be addressed. Preliminary reports have shown that magnetic resonance imaging can improve the PCa detection rate, save patients from unnecessary biopsies, and decrease the need for a high number of cores; however, multiple limitations continue to exist.

[Incidence of locally invasive prostate cancer in patients with intermediate values of prostate-specific antigen]

BACKGROUND/AIM

Feasibility of radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with locally invasive prostate cancer (PC) is assessed by the standard parameters such as the stage of the disease, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and bioptic Gleason grade (GG). Intermediate values of PSA are important in predicting the local confines of the tumor, but can also be detected in more than 30% of patients with locally advanced PC. The aim of this study was to find out the incidence of locally advanced PC in the patients with intermediate serum PSA in whom RP had been performed.

METHODS

We used the biopsy cores and the tissue obtained after RP from 46 patients who had intermidiate PSA values which were defined as PSA from 2.6-10 ng/ml. In all the patients classical regional lymphadenectomy was performed. In all the patients, preoperative stage was determined according to the Partin tables (PT) from 2001.

RESULTS

In 52, 17% of the patients biopsy GG was < or = 6, while it was 7 in 47.83% of the patients. Clinically localized disease (cT2b) was found in 86.96% of patients; other 13.04% of the patients had locally advanced PC. After RP, the incidence of localized PC was 47.83%, while the advanced disease was found in 52.17%. Metastasis in one or two regional lymph nodes (N1) was found in 10.87% of the patients with the advanced PC. According to PT, the expected incidence of positive lymph nodes should have been 8% for pT3 stage. Positive correlation between the assumed N1 stage according to PT and N1 stage in our radical prostatectomies was statistically significant (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

In more than 50% of patients with intermediate values of PSA locally advanced disease can be expected after RP. The use of the Partin tables have an important predictive value in assessing the local confines of the cancer and metastasis in regional lymph nodes.

Discrepancies in Gleason scoring of prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens and the effects of multiple needle biopsies on scoring accuracy. A regional experience in Tamworth, Australia

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to review the discrepancies in Gleason scores (GS) of prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens and the effects of multiple-needle biopsies on scoring accuracy.

METHODS

One hundred patients who had undergone consecutive radical prostatectomies (RP) between January 2004 and May 2006 were reviewed retrospectively. Patient information including age, prebiopsy prostate-specific antigen levels, biopsy GS, RP GS and pathology details were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

The concordance rate of biopsy GS and RP GS was found to be at 43%, with 46% of biopsy specimens being undergraded. Eleven per cent of the specimens were overgraded. The accuracy was fairly similar when specimens were reported by the same or different pathologists, at 42 and 44%, respectively. The accuracy of biopsy GS improved with increasing number of biopsies taken.

CONCLUSION

There are significant discrepancies in Gleason scoring of biopsy and RP specimens, with a concordance rate of 43% and undergrading rate of 46%. Increasing the number of biopsies helps improve scoring accuracy. Clinicians and patients need to be mindful when deciding cancer treatment options, in view of these discrepancies.

An abnormal digital rectal examination is an independent predictor of Gleason > or =7 prostate cancer in men undergoing initial prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 790 men

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate our experience with a referral population of 790 patients undergoing initial prostate biopsy in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era, to assess the role of a digital rectal examination (DRE) in predicting the outcome of prostate needle biopsy (PNB) and to evaluate if DRE findings were associated with cancer grade.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analysed 790 consecutive men who had an initial PNB from September 1999 to July 2005 by one urologist (C.P.). All data were collected in a prospective database. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between an abnormal DRE and the presence of cancer and cancer grade on PNB.

RESULTS

An abnormal DRE was an independent predictor for prostate cancer on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 2.18, 95% confidence interval 1.53-3.10, P < 0.001). In all patients biopsied, an abnormal DRE was associated with a Gleason sum of > or = 7 on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 3.39, 2.07-5.53, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A DRE is a useful and important tool to use when assessing patients for a PNB. An abnormal DRE independently predicted high-grade disease in these men. These results might have important implications in the prediction of men with other than indolent prostate cancer.

Comparison of Gleason grade and score between preoperative biopsy and prostatectomy specimens in prostate cancer

AIM

Although the histopathological findings obtained from biopsy specimens are important for choosing the appropriate management of prostate cancer, there have been some discrepancies in Gleason grade and consequently, score between biopsy and surgical specimens. A comparison of findings between these two kinds of specimens was performed.

METHODS

Radical prostatectomy was performed at Asahi General Hospital on 223 cases of T1b-T3 without previous cancer treatment, and the Gleason grade and score of the biopsy and surgical specimens were compared.

RESULTS

A 37% coincidence in Gleason score was obtained between biopsy and surgical specimens; coincidence including one digit difference in score was approximately 70%. Upgrading was more than downgrading. Disagreement in secondary grade was greater than that in primary grade. Disagreement in Gleason score was roughly similar among different score items and was not influenced by level of prostate-specific antigen, however, the small volume of the cancer tissues more affected the discrepancy in score.

CONCLUSION

The use of biopsy findings is required to be taken into account regarding the discrepancy.