Consequences to hearing during the conservative management of vestibular schwannomas

Vestibular Schwannoma International Study of Active Surveillance Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery: The VISAS Study

PURPOSE

The present study assesses the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus observation for Koos grade 1 and 2 vestibular schwannoma (VS), benign tumors affecting hearing and neurological function.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This multicenter study analyzed data from Koos grade 1 and 2 VS patients managed with SRS (SRS group) or observation (observation group). Propensity score matching balanced patient demographics, tumor volume, and audiometry. Outcomes measured were tumor control, serviceable hearing preservation, and neurological outcomes.

RESULTS

In 125 matched patients in each group with a 36-month median follow-up (P = .49), SRS yielded superior 5- and 10-year tumor control rates (99% CI, 97.1%-100%, and 91.9% CI, 79.4%-100%) versus observation (45.8% CI, 36.8%-57.2%, and 22% CI, 13.2%-36.7%; P < .001). Serviceable hearing preservation rates at 5 and 9 years were comparable (SRS 60.4% CI, 49.9%-73%, vs observation 51.4% CI, 41.3%-63.9%, and SRS 27% CI, 14.5%-50.5%, vs observation 30% CI, 17.2%-52.2%; P = .53). SRS were associated with lower odds of tinnitus (OR = 0.39, P = .01), vestibular dysfunction (OR = 0.11, P = .004), and any cranial nerve palsy (OR = 0.36, P = .003), with no change in cranial nerves 5 or 7 (P > .05). Composite endpoints of tumor progression and/or any of the previous outcomes showed significant lower odds associated with SRS compared with observation alone (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

SRS management in matched cohorts of Koos grade 1 and 2 VS patients demonstrated superior tumor control, comparable hearing preservation rates, and significantly lower odds of experiencing neurological deficits. These findings delineate the safety and efficacy of SRS in the management of this patient population.

Analysis of the association between vestibular schwannoma and hearing status using a newly developed radiomics technique

PURPOSE

Vestibular schwannoma is a benign tumor originating from Schwann cells surrounding the eighth cranial nerve and can cause hearing loss, tinnitus, balance problems, and facial nerve disorders. Because of the slow growth of the tumor, predicting the hearing function of patients with vestibular schwannoma's is important to obtain information that would be useful for deciding the treatment modality. This study aimed to analyze the association between magnetic resonance imaging features and hearing status using a new radiomics technique.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 115 magnetic resonance images and hearing results from 73 patients with vestibular schwannoma. A total of 70 radiomics features from each tumor volume were calculated using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Radiomics features were classified as histogram-based, shape-based, texture-based, and filter-based. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was used to select the radiomics features among the 70 features that best predicted the hearing test. To ensure the stability of the selected features, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was repeated 10 times. Finally, features set five or more times were selected as radiomics signatures.

RESULTS

The radiomics signatures selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method were: minimum, variance, maximum 3D diameter, size zone variance, log skewness, skewness slope, and kurtosis slope. In random forest, the mean performance was 0.66 (0.63-0.77), and the most important feature was Log skewness.

CONCLUSIONS

Newly developed radiomics features are associated with hearing status in patients with vestibular schwannoma and could provide information when deciding the treatment modality.

Factors associated with hearing outcomes after a middle fossa approach in 131 consecutive patients with vestibular schwannomas

OBJECTIVE

The middle fossa approach is an effective option for the treatment of small (Koos grade I and II) vestibular schwannomas (VSs) when the goal is hearing preservation. The authors evaluated the rates of hearing preservation and examined the factors associated with improved hearing outcomes after the middle fossa approach for VSs.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center cohort study evaluating the clinical outcomes after resection of small VSs using the middle fossa approach, consecutive adult patients (> 18 years) who underwent surgery between January 2000 and December 2021 were included. Clinical and imaging characteristics were analyzed, including baseline hearing status, duration of surgery, anesthetic parameters, and imaging characteristics of the surgically treated tumors.

RESULTS

Among the 131 included patients, 102 had valid and discoverable pre- and postoperative audiology assessments. The mean follow-up was 26 months (range 1-180 months). There were 85 patients with serviceable hearing preoperatively, defined as American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) class A or B, of whom 78% retained class A or B hearing at the last follow-up. Binary logistic regression demonstrated that preoperative hearing AAO-HNS class (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.77; p = 0.02), overlap between fundus and cochlea (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11-0.96; p = 0.04), and duration of anesthesia (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99; p = 0.03) were independent predictors of hearing outcomes. Additionally, 75% of patients with high diffusion-weighted imaging signal in the tumor (p = 0.009) and 67% of patients with the tumor originating at the modiolus of the cochlea (p = 0.004) had poor hearing outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The hearing preservation rates after microsurgical resection of small VSs using the middle fossa approach are high, with 78% of patients maintaining AAO-HNS class A or B hearing. Poor hearing status at baseline, longer duration of anesthesia, and large overlap between the fundus of the internal auditory canal and the cochlea were independently associated with unfavorable hearing outcomes. Imaging characteristics can be used to stratify patients' risk of hearing loss.

Hearing After Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: Is It Preserved Forever?

INTRODUCTION

Currently, it is possible to preserve the auditory nerve in a large number of cases, but the preservation of the hearing itself is unpredictable. Apart from wait and scan strategy and stereoradiotherapy, hearing after vestibular schwannoma surgery is considered to remain stable even in long-term follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients had preserved hearing after retrosigmoid suboccipital microsurgery of the vestibular schwannoma between 2008 and 2014. A standard audiological protocol was performed together with an magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the fluid content of the inner ear.

RESULTS

The mean difference in pure-tone average between the direct and final postsurgical examination was 12.758 dB ( p = 2.5E - 06). The word recognition score deteriorated by 17.45% ( p = 0.03516). The mean American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery score on the second examination was 2.5, and that on the second examination was 3.111 ( p = 0.00483). There was no significant deterioration in the healthy ear.The signal intensity ratio in the basal turn of the cochlea increased by an average of 0.13 points ( p < 0.05).Patients with persistent tumor or nodular enhancement in the internal acoustic meatus deteriorated significantly in hearing according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery scale compared with patients without any finding in the meatus ( p = 0.01299).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a discrete but gradual deterioration of the hearing in the postoperative period. Hearing impairment is more pronounced in patients with a nodular process in the internal acoustic meatus, regardless of whether it is growth active. After surgery, the pathological content of the inner ear normalizes (evaluated on T2 magnetic resonance imaging sequences).

Management of Vestibular Schwannoma with Normal Hearing

INTRODUCTION

This work aimed to study the management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients with normal hearing (NH).

METHODS

A retrospective study was undertaken in a Quaternary referral center for skull base pathologies. Among 4,000 VS patients 162 met our strict audiological criteria for NH. These patients were divided into 2 management groups, wait and scan (W&S) (45/162, 25%) and operated patients (123/162, 75%), and 6 patients were included in both groups.

RESULTS

Our management strategy achieved the goals for treatment of VS. First goal, all tumors were completely removed except for 2 intentional residuals. Second goal, facial nerve (FN) function preservation (House Brackmann I, II, and III) was 95.9%. Third goal, possible hearing preservation (HP) attempts occurred in (50/122) (40.9%) with an HP rate in 44% of the patients. Additionally, there were only 2 cases of postoperative complications with no CSF leakage. The prospect of HP in NH patients did not differ with respect to tumor size. However, patients with normal preoperative ABR seemed to have better chances of HP and good FN function and vice versa. HP rate was superior for the MCFA as opposed to the RS + RLA. W&S group demonstrated hearing stability in 88.9% of the patients and FN function stability of HB I in 100% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection is a reasonable and definitive management option for VS with NH. Nevertheless, choosing to manage cases with observation remains an appropriate management option for NH patients. ABR might be considered as an adjuvant tool indicating better prognosis for HP.

Matched Comparison of Hearing Outcomes in Patients With Vestibular Schwannoma Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery or Observation

BACKGROUND

Previous studies comparing hearing outcomes in patients managed with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and a watch-and-wait strategy were limited by small sample sizes that prevented controlling for potential confounders, including initial hearing status, tumor size, and age.

OBJECTIVE

To compare hearing outcomes for patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) managed with observation and SRS while controlling for confounders with propensity score matching.

METHODS

Propensity score matching was used to compare 198 patients with unilateral VS with initial serviceable hearing (99 treated with SRS and 99 managed with observation alone) and 116 with initial class A hearing (58 managed with SRS and 58 with observation), matched by initial hearing status, tumor volume, age, and sex. Kaplan-Meier survival methods were used to compare risk of losing class A and serviceable hearing.

RESULTS

Between patients with VS managed with SRS or observation alone, there was no significant difference in loss of class A hearing (median time 27.2 months, 95% CI 16.8-43.4, and 29.2 months, 95% CI 20.4-62.5, P = .88) or serviceable hearing (median time 37.7 months, 95% CI 25.7-58.4, and 48.8 months, 95% CI 38.4-86.3, P = .18). For SRS patients, increasing mean cochlear dose was not related to loss of class A hearing (hazard ratio 1.3, P = .17) but was associated with increasing risk of serviceable hearing loss (hazard ratio of 1.5 per increase in Gy, P = .017).

CONCLUSION

When controlling for potential confounders, there was no significant difference in loss of class A or serviceable hearing between patients managed with SRS or with observation alone.

Hearing improvement after vestibular schwannoma surgery in the era of the hearing preservation rule - case report and literature review

OBJECTIVES

Hearing preservation after vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery remains a surgical challenge. In some patients with preserved inner ear function, hearing improvement is achievable. As it is currently impossible to determine which patients will present this outcome, predictions must rely on previously published reports. Our case report describes a patient who experienced hearing improvement from an unuseful level to a useful one after vestibular schwannoma surgery.

METHODS

Surgery was performed via suboccipital retrosigmoid approach. The patient underwent a basic audiovestibular protocol before and after the surgery - pure tone and speech audiometry, otoacoustic emissions, auditory brainstem responses, electronystagmography - together with a detailed questionnaire study. Usefulness of hearing was evaluated using the AAO-HNS guidelines, supplemented by a frequency of 4 kHz.

RESULTS

Hearing was preserved and even improved from an unuseful level to a useful one. Based on the available literature, the most informative predictive factors for such a result seem to be: sudden sensorineural hearing loss prior to surgery, elicitable otoacoustic emissions and the origin from the superior vestibular nerve.

CONCLUSION

There are a limited number of studies on this topic and it is still impossible to regularly improve hearing in properly selected patients. Furthermore, the importance of postoperative hearing quality compared to other symptoms and complications remains debatable.

Current Understanding of Hearing Loss in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review

Objective

Hearing loss is the most common initial symptom in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannomas (SVS). Hearing preservation is an important goal of both conservative and surgical therapy. However, the mechanism of SVS-associated hearing loss remains unclear. Thus, we performed this systematic review to summarize the current understanding of hearing loss in the SVS and distill a testable hypothesis to further illuminate its underlying mechanism.

Methods

A systematic review querying four databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Web of Science) was performed to identify studies evaluating hearing loss in patients with SVS and exploring the potential mechanisms of hearing impairment.

Results

A total of 50 articles were eligible and included in this review. After analysis, the retrieved studies could be categorized into four types: (1) 29 studies explore the relationship between hearing loss and the growth pattern of the tumor (e.g., tumor size/volume, growth rate, tumor location, etc.); (2) ten studies investigate the potential role of cochlear dysfunction in hearing deterioration, including structural abnormality, protein elevation in perilymph, and cochlear malfunctioning; (3) two studies looked into SVS-induced impairment of auditory pathway and cortex; (4) in the rest nine studies, researchers explored the molecular mechanism underlying hearing loss in SVS, which involves molecular and genetic alterations, inflammatory response, growth factors, and other tumor-associated secretions.

Conclusions

Multiple factors may contribute to the hearing impairment in SVS, including the growth pattern of tumor, cochlear dysfunction, impairment of auditory pathway and cortex, genetic and molecular changes. However, our current understanding is still limited, and future studies are needed to explore this multifactorial hypothesis and dig deeper into its underlying mechanism.

Hearing loss and volumetric growth rate in untreated vestibular schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the authors aimed to clarify the relationship between hearing loss and tumor volumetric growth rates in patients with untreated vestibular schwannoma (VS).

METHODS

Records of 128 treatment-naive patients diagnosed with unilateral VS between 2012 and 2018 with serial audiometric assessment and MRI were reviewed. Tumor growth rates were determined from initial and final tumor volumes, with a median follow-up of 24.3 months (IQR 8.5-48.8 months). Hearing changes were based on pure tone averages, speech discrimination scores, and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery hearing class. Primary outcomes were the loss of class A hearing and loss of serviceable hearing, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and with associations estimated from Cox proportional hazards models and reported as hazard ratios.

RESULTS

Larger initial tumor size was associated with an increased risk of losing class A (HR 1.5 for a 1-cm3 increase; p = 0.047) and serviceable (HR 1.3; p < 0.001) hearing. Additionally, increasing volumetric tumor growth rate was associated with elevated risk of loss of class A hearing (HR 1.2 for increase of 100% per year; p = 0.031) and serviceable hearing (HR 1.2; p = 0.014). Hazard ratios increased linearly with increasing growth rates, without any evident threshold growth rate that resulted in a large, sudden increased risk of hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger initial tumor size and faster tumor growth rates were associated with an elevated risk of loss of class A and serviceable hearing.

Endolymphatic Hydrops in Fluctuating Hearing Loss and Recurrent Vertigo

Background: Endolymphatic hydrops (EH) is the histopathological hallmark of Ménière's disease (MD) and has been found by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with several inner ear syndromes without definite MD criteria. The incidence and relevance of this finding is under debate.

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of EH and audiovestibular test results in groups of patients with fluctuating audiovestibular symptoms not fulfilling the actual criteria for definite MD and compare them with a similar group of patients with definite MD and a group of patients with recent idiopathic sudden neurosensory hearing loss (ISSNHL).

Material and Methods: 170 patients were included, 83 with definite MD, 38 with fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss, 34 with recurrent vertigo, and 15 with ISSNHL. The clinical variables, audiovestibular tests, and EH were evaluated and compared. Logistic proportional hazard models were used to obtain the odds ratio for hydrops development, including a multivariable adjusted model for potential confounders.

Results: No statistical differences between groups were found regarding disease duration, episodes, Tumarkin spells, migraine, vascular risk factors, or vestibular tests; only hearing loss showed differences. Regarding EH, we found significant differences between groups, with odds ratio (OR) for EH presence in definite MD group vs. all other patients of 11.43 (4.5–29.02; p < 0.001). If the ISSNHL group was used as reference, OR was 55.2 (11.9–253.9; p < 0.001) for the definite MD group, 9.9 (2.1–38.9; p = 0.003) for the recurrent vertigo group, and 5.1 (1.2–21.7; p = 0.03) for the group with fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss.

Conclusion: The percentage of patients with EH varies between groups. It is minimal in the ISSNHL group and increases in groups with increasing fluctuating audiovestibular symptoms, with a rate of severe EH similar to the known rate of progression to definite MD in those groups, suggesting that presence of EH by MRI could be related to the risk of progression to definite MD. Thus, EH imaging in these patients is recommended.

[Hearing classification in patients with vestibular schwannoma using German-language test procedures]

BACKGROUND

Hearing function in patients with vestibular schwannoma is often classified according to the Gardner and Robertson (1988) or the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS, 1995) systems. These classification systems are based on English-language test procedures, there is no German-language equivalent. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of various target parameters on hearing classification and to derive a recommendation for the use of German-language test methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The rules for speech audiometry based on English-language test procedures were applied to German speech test materials. In 91 patients with vestibular schwannoma, pure tone hearing thresholds, speech recognition thresholds, and speech discrimination at different sound pressure levels were measured. The patients were categorized according to the Gardner and Robertson and AAO-HNS classifications.

RESULTS

In both the Gardner-Robertson and the AAO-HNS classifications, the number of patients in the hearing classes with serviceable hearing function (measured as Pure Tone Average across three (3PTA) or four (4PTA) frequencies) was highest when using the 3PTA_{0,5;1;2 kHz} condition, followed by 4PTA_{0,5;1;2;3 kHz}, 4PTA_{0,5;1;2;4 kHz}, and 4PTA_{0,5;1;2;"3"kHz}. If maximum word recognition score (WRS_max) was used instead of word recognition 40 dB above the sensation level (WRS_40SL), more patients were classified into the hearing classes with serviceable hearing function, irrespective of the mean pure tone hearing threshold.

CONCLUSION

The Gardner-Robertson and AAO-HNS classifications can be used in German-speaking settings. The Freiburg monosyllabic test can be used to determine speech discrimination scores or maximum word recognition.

The Influence of Vestibular Schwannoma Tumor Volume and Growth on Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the relationship among vestibular schwannoma (VS) tumor volume, growth, and hearing loss.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single tertiary center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Adults with observed VS and serviceable hearing at diagnosis were included. The primary outcome was the development of nonserviceable hearing as estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations of tumor volume with baseline hearing were assessed using Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Associations of volume and growth with the development of nonserviceable hearing over time were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and summarized with hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

Of 230 patients with VS and serviceable hearing at diagnosis, 213 had serial volumetric tumor data for analysis. Larger tumor volume at diagnosis was associated with increased pure-tone average (PTA) (P < .001) and decreased word recognition score (WRS) (P = .014). Estimated rates of maintaining serviceable hearing at 6 and 10 years following diagnosis were 67% and 49%, respectively. Larger initial tumor volume was associated with development of nonserviceable hearing in a univariable setting (HR for 1-cm³ increase: 1.36, P = .040) but not after adjusting for PTA and WRS. Tumor growth was not significantly associated with time to nonserviceable hearing (HR, 1.57; P = .14), although estimated rates of maintaining serviceable hearing during observation were poorer in the group that experienced growth.

CONCLUSION

Larger initial VS tumor volume was associated with poorer hearing at baseline. Larger initial tumor volume was also associated with the development of nonserviceable hearing during observation in a univariable setting; however, this association was not statistically significant after adjusting for baseline hearing status.

Systematic Review of Hearing Preservation After Radiotherapy for Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term hearing preservation rate for spontaneous vestibular schwannoma treated by primary radiotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews, and EMBASE databases were searched using a comprehensive Boolean keyword search developed in conjunction with a scientific librarian. English language papers published from 2000 to 2016 were evaluated.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria: full articles, pretreatment and posttreatment audiograms or audiogram based scoring system, vestibular schwannoma only tumor type, reported time to follow-up, published after 1999, use of either Gamma Knife or linear accelerator radiotherapy.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

case report or series with fewer than five cases, inadequate audiometric data, inadequate time to follow-up, neurofibromatosis type 2 exceeding 10% of study population, previous treatment exceeding 10% of study population, repeat datasets, use of proton beam therapy, and non-English language.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently analyzed papers for inclusion. Class A/B, 1/2 hearing was defined as either pure tone average less than or equal to 50 db with speech discrimination score more than or equal to 50%, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) Hearing Class A or B, or Gardner-Robertson Grade I or II. Aggregate data were used when individual data were not specified.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Means were compared with student t test.

CONCLUSIONS

Forty seven articles containing a total of 2,195 patients with preserved Class A/B, 1/2 hearing were identified for analysis. The aggregate crude hearing preservation rate was 58% at an average reporting time of 46.6 months after radiotherapy treatment. Analysis of time-based reporting shows a clear trend of decreased hearing preservation extending to 10-year follow-up. This data encourages a future long-term controlled trial.

Long term results of primary radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a primary option for management for both newly diagnosed vestibular schwannomas (VS), as well as VS that enlarge after initial observation.

METHODS

A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained data base found 871 patients who underwent Gamma knife® SRS as their initial (primary) management between 1987 and 2008. Follow-up ranged from 1-25 years (median = 5.2 years) Median tumor volume was 0.9 cc (0.02-36) and median margin dose was 13 Gy (12-25).

RESULTS

Progression free survival (PFS) after SRS was 97% at 3 years, 95% at 5 years, and 94% at 10 years. Freedom from delayed surgical resection was found in 98.7% of patients. Smaller tumor volume was significantly associated with improved PFS. There were 326 patients with serviceable hearing (Gardner-Robertson 1 or 2) at the time of SRS with audiological follow-up of ≥ 1 year. Serviceable hearing preservation rates after SRS were 89.8% at 1 year, 76.9% at 3 years, 68.4% at 5 years, 62.5% at 7 years, and 51.4% at 10 years. Factors associated with improved serviceable hearing preservation included younger age, Gardner-Robertson grade 1 at SRS, and absence of subjective complaints of dysequilibrium or vertigo (vestibulopathy). Fifty-one patients (5.8%) developed trigeminal neuropathy. Fourteen (1.6%) developed a transient House-Brackmann grade 2 or 3 facial neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this report with extended follow-up, primary SRS achieved tumor growth control in 94% of patients. Optimization of long- term cranial nerve outcomes remains an important achievement of this management strategy for VS.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on Hearing Preservation Outcomes in Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas

Question 1

What is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following stereotactic radiosurgery utilizing modern dose planning, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled that there is moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 2

Among patients with AAO-HNS (American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery hearing classification) class A or GR (Gardner-Robertson hearing classification) grade I hearing at baseline, what is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following stereotactic radiosurgery, utilizing modern dose planning, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled that there is a high probability (>75%-100%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 3

What patient- and tumor-related factors influence progression to nonserviceable hearing following stereotactic radiosurgery using ≤13 Gy to the tumor margin?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled regarding the probability of successful hearing preservation based on the following prognostic data: the most consistent prognostic features associated with maintenance of serviceable hearing are good preoperative word recognition and/or pure tone thresholds with variable cut-points reported, smaller tumor size, marginal tumor dose ≤12 Gy, and cochlear dose ≤4 Gy. Age and sex are not strong predictors of hearing preservation outcome.

Question 4

What is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following microsurgical resection of small to medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannomas early after surgery, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering microsurgical resection should be counseled that there is a moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation immediately following surgery, moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 5

Among patients with AAO-HNS class A or GR grade I hearing at baseline, what is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following microsurgical resection of small to medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannomas early after surgery, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering microsurgical resection should be counseled that there is a moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation immediately following surgery, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 6

What patient- and tumor-related factors influence progression to nonserviceable hearing following microsurgical resection of small to medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannomas?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering microsurgical resection should be counseled regarding the probability of successful hearing preservation based on the following prognostic data: the most consistent prognostic features associated with maintenance of serviceable hearing are good preoperative word recognition and/or pure tone thresholds with variable cut-points reported, smaller tumor size commonly less than 1 cm, and presence of a distal internal auditory canal cerebrospinal fluid fundal cap. Age and sex are not strong predictors of hearing preservation outcome.

Question 7

What is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing with conservative observation of vestibular schwannomas at 2, 5, and 10 yr following diagnosis?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering observation should be counseled that there is a high probability (>75%-100%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 8

Among patients with AAO-HNS class A or GR grade I hearing at baseline, what is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing with conservative observation at 2 and 5 yr following diagnosis?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled that there is a high probability (>75%-100%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, and moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr. Insufficient data were available to determine the probability of hearing preservation at 10 yr for this population subset.

Question 9

What patient and tumor-related factors influence progression to nonserviceable hearing during conservative observation?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering observation should be counseled regarding probability of successful hearing preservation based on the following prognostic data: the most consistent prognostic features associated with maintenance of serviceable hearing are good preoperative word recognition and/or pure tone thresholds with variable cut-points reported, as well as nongrowth of the tumor. Tumor size at the time of diagnosis, age, and sex do not predict future development of nonserviceable hearing during observation.  The full guideline can be found at: https://www.cns.org/guidelines/guidelines-manage-ment-patients-vestibular-schwannoma/chapter_3.

Vestibular Schwanomma: An Experience in a Developing World

Background

Tumors related to the acoustic nerves represent 90% of cerebellopontine angle diseases and have been in the picture for at least 200 years. Famous as acoustic neuromas and vestibular neuromas, these are usually benign, slow-growing tumors of Schwann cells of the myelin sheath. Surgery is the treatment of choice though some authors have suggested "wait and watch" policy. The aims of our study were to study the clinical presentation and management of the tumors, and to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of the surgery.

Methods

A retrospective review of the datasheet of 33 patients diagnosed with vestibular schwanomma who had undergone surgery from January 2014 to January 2017 was performed in National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. Analysis of the demographic data and perioperative outcomes was performed.

Results

Hearing loss was the main presenting symptom in 72% cases followed by tinnitus, dizziness, facial numbness and sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Mean tumur size was 39.7 ± 3 mm. The mean age of the patients was 46 ± 3 years with a female preponderance (1.2:1). In particular, the retrosigmoid route was preferred in all the cases since it was the most employed approach at our center and 63% of the tumors presented to us were grade 5. The surgical techniques allowed safe preservation of the facial function which was 93%. The hearing loss did not improve after the surgery in 94% while it worsened in 6% of cases. We did not find any significant relation between outcome and size, age, gender or laterality of the tumor (P > 0.05). There was no perioperative mortality.

Conclusions

The benign and slow-growing nature of vestibular schwanomma usually poses problems for the early diagnosis and treatment especially in a poor resource setting like ours. Likewise, there are very few studies so far done in the country regarding the incidence and management of the disease. Thus, this study might be helpful in providing insight into the occurrence of the disease in the present scenario and the need for much more studies in the future.

Middle Fossa Approach for Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas: A Decade of Experience

BACKGROUND

The middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach is a challenging surgical technique for the resection of small and intermediate sized, primarily intracanalicular, vestibular schwannomas (VS), with the goal of hearing preservation (HP).

OBJECTIVE

To describe a decade-long, single institutional experience with the MCF approach for resection of VS.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 63 patients who underwent the MCF approach for resection of VS from 2006 to 2016. Audiometric data included pure-tone average (PTA), low-tone pure-tone average (LtPTA), word recognition score, and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) hearing classification at presentation and follow-up. Patients with postoperative serviceable (AAO-HNS class A-B) and/or useful (AAO-HNS class A-C) hearing were compared to those without HP. Facial nerve function was assessed using the House–Brackmann scale.

RESULTS

The mean age and duration of follow-up were 50 ± 13 yr and 21 ± 21 mo, respectively. The mean tumor size was 10 ± 4 mm. The serviceable and usable HP rates were 54% and 50%, respectively. Some residual hearing was preserved in 71% of patients. Large tumor size (P = .05), volume (P = .03), and extrameatal tumor extension (P = .03) were associated with poor audiometric outcomes. The presence of a fundal fluid cap (P = .01) was a favorable finding. At definitive testing, LtPTA was significantly better preserved than traditional PTA (P = .01). Facial nerve outcomes, tumor control rates, and durability of audiometric outcomes were excellent. 47% of patients pursued aural rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

In our series, the MCF approach for VS provided excellent rates of tumor and facial nerve function, with durable serviceable HP.

Optimal treatment of jugular foramen schwannomas: long-term outcome of a multidisciplinary approach for a series of 29 cases in a single institute

BACKGROUND

The goal of treatment for jugular foramen schwannomas (JFSs) is to achieve complete tumor removal with cranial nerve preservation. However, achieving this goal remains a challenge despite the advances in microsurgical techniques. The aim of this study was to determine optimal treatment strategies for JFSs based on a review of a series of 29 surgical cases in our institute.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1997 and 2013, 29 patients with JFSs underwent surgical treatment by multidisciplinary otoneurosurgical approaches. We retrospectively evaluated various clinical outcomes including the extent of tumor resection, postoperative cranial nerve deficits, and the recurrence rate. Tumor extension was classified using the Kaye and Pellet classification (KPC) system, and the extent of tumor resection was graded as gross total resection (GTR), near total resection (NTR), and subtotal resection (STR). We utilized the House-Brackmann facial nerve grading system (HBFNGS), the average pure-tone audiometry and speech audiometry (PTA/SA) tests, and the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association National Outcome Measurement System (ASHA NOMS) swallowing scale (ASHA level) for assessment of functional outcomes.

RESULTS

The extent of tumor resection was not related to the degree of immediate postoperative cranial nerve deficits. However, the surgical approach was significantly related to postoperative hearing status and immediate postoperative facial function. Also, among the ten patients who were below the level of acceptable facial function immediately postoperatively, nine patients (90%) recovered to acceptable facial function by the last follow-up. Concerning postoperative swallowing status, all 21 patients recovered swallowing function by the last follow-up. Postoperative Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKRS) was performed for three recurrent and seven residual tumors, and recurrence was not observed in the mean 36-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

A surgical strategy should be tailored to the individual case, and clinicians should consider the possibility of recurrence and further adjuvant treatment.

Hearing Preservation up to 3 Years After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Gardner-Robertson Class I Patients With Vestibular Schwannomas

BACKGROUND:

Vestibular schwannoma patients with Gardner-Robertson (GR) class I hearing seek to maintain high-level hearing whenever possible.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate hearing outcomes at 2 to 3 years in GR class I patients who underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS).

METHODS:

Sixty-eight patients with GR class I hearing were identified between 2006 and 2009. Twenty-five patients had no subjective hearing loss (group A) and 43 patients reported subjective hearing loss (group B) before GKRS. The median tumor volume (1 cm3) and tumor margin dose (12.5 Gy) were the same in both groups.

RESULTS:

Serviceable hearing retention rates (GR grade I or II) were 100% for group A compared with 81% at 1 year, 60% at 2 years, and 57% at 3 years after GKRS for group B patients. Group A patients had significantly higher rates of hearing preservation in either GR class I (P &lt; .001) or GR class II (P &lt; .001). Patients with a pure tone average (PTA) &lt;15 dB before GKRS had significantly higher rates of preservation of GR class I or II hearing.

CONCLUSION:

At 2 to 3 years after GKRS, patients without subjective hearing loss or a PTA &lt;15 dB had higher rates of grade I or II hearing preservation. Modification of the GR hearing classification into 2 groups of grade I hearing (group A, those with no subjective hearing loss and a PTA &lt;15 dB; and group B, those with subjective hearing loss and a PTA &gt;15 dB) may be useful to help predict hearing preservation rates at 2 to 3 years after GKRS.

Fractionated radiation therapy for vestibular schwannoma

Vestibular schwannomas are the most common tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. Multiple management paradigms exist for patients with these benign tumors, including observation, microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and fractionated radiation therapy, or some combination of these. While the proper course of management is controversial, the goals of therapy are to achieve excellent local tumor control and optimize functional outcomes with as little treatment-related morbidity as possible. Decision-making is tailored to patient-specific factors such as tumor size, clinical presentation, patient age, and goals of hearing preservation. We review the literature in order to summarize the application of fractionated radiation therapy to this tumor entity, where it is used as a primary treatment or, more commonly, as an adjunct therapy. We also provide an overview of the use of fractionated radiation therapy for the preservation of hearing and facial function, and dosing and other technical considerations, in light of the indolent natural history of vestibular schwannomas. We also discuss potential risks associated with this treatment modality, including its effects on temporal bone structures and cranial nerves among other possible complications. Lastly, we outline future directions in this rapidly evolving segment of vestibular schwannoma therapy, which has benefited from the advent of intensity-modulated radiation therapy coupled with stereotactic localization.

Determining benchmarks in hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma

Objectives The objectives of this study were to determine minimal benchmarks of success in vestibular schwannoma hearing preservation surgery, wherein the likelihood of having preserved hearing in a single patient is at least as likely as having created a poor facial nerve outcome for a single patient. Design This is a statistical analysis of published literature. Setting Academic Tertiary Medical Center. Main Outcome Measures Based on published natural history data, the number needed to treat (NNT) equation was used to calculate the minimally acceptable hearing preservation rates within various hearing classification schemes. Results Given good facial nerve outcome rates of 85, 90, and 95%, the corresponding hearing preservation rates at 4.7 years that are likely to preserve classes A and B hearing (American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery classification) in a single patient as to cause a poor facial nerve outcome are 70, 65, and 60%, respectively. If surgery is limited exclusively to intracanalicular tumors, these rates drop to 62, 57, and 52%, respectively. If the word recognition scoring classification is used, required hearing preservation rates are higher. Conclusion It is possible to use the NNT equation alongside projected facial nerve outcomes to estimate benchmarks of minimally acceptable hearing preservation rates.

Conservative management, gamma-knife radiosurgery, and microsurgery for acoustic neurinomas: A systematic review of outcome and risk of three therapeutic options

Conservative management, gamma-knife (GK) radiosurgery, and microsurgery are therapeutic options for acoustic neurinomas (ANs). To determine the outcomes and risks of these methods this systematic review analyzed data from 903 patients with conservative management, 1475 with GK radiosurgery, and 5005 with microsurgery from 38 studies identified in MEDLINE searches. Conservative management over a 3.1-year period showed that 51% of ANs showed a tumor growth, an average tumor growth rate was 1.87 mm year-1, 20% of ANs ultimately required surgical intervention, and a third of the patients lost useful hearing. GK radiosurgery significantly reduced the percentage of ANs that enlarged, to 8%, and reduced the percentage that underwent microsurgery to 4.6% over a 3.8-year period. Microsurgery removed 96% of ANs totally, with tumor recurrence, mortality, and major disability rates of 1.8%, 0.63%, and 2.9%, respectively. The majority of ANs grow slowly, but ultimately require intervention. Carrying the risk of hearing loss, conservative management should be supplemented with close follow-up. With a low rate of morbidity, GK radiosurgery suppresses tumor growth and provides good tumor control. Microsurgery provides the best tumor control, although mortality and morbidity are not completely eliminated.

Expectant management of vestibular schwannoma: a retrospective multivariate analysis of tumor growth and outcome

We conducted a retrospective observational study to assess the consequences of conservative management of vestibular schwannoma (VS). Data were collected from tertiary neuro-otological referral units in United Kingdom. The study included 59 patients who were managed conservatively with radiological diagnosis of VS. The main outcome measures were growth rate and rate of failure of conservative management. Multivariate analysis sought correlation between tumor growth and (i) demographic features, (ii) tumor characteristics. The mean tumor growth was 0.66 mm/y. 11 patients (19%) required intervention. Mean time to intervention was 37 months with two notable late "failures" occurring at 75 and 84 months. Tumors extending into the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) grew significantly faster than intracanalicular tumors (p = 0.0045). No association was found between growth rate and age, sex, tumor laterality, facial nerve function, and grade of hearing loss. Conservative management is acceptable for a subset of patients. Tumors extending into the CPA at diagnosis grow significantly faster than intracanalicular tumors. No growth within 5 years of surveillance does not guarantee a continued indolent growth pattern; surveillance must therefore continue.

Predictors of volumetric growth and auditory deterioration in vestibular schwannomas followed in a wait and scan policy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify factors predicting growth and audiologic deterioration during follow-up (FU) in a wait and scan (W&S) policy of vestibular schwannomas (VSs) using a novel volumetric measuring tool. So far, only consecutive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is able to show growth objectively, and growth, combined with hearing function, generally dictates further intervention. Other factors predicting growth or hearing deterioration would be invaluable and might ease clinical decision making.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Sixty-three patients diagnosed with VS at Maastricht University Medical Center between 2003 and 2008, with FU data available from 36 patients.

INTERVENTION(S)

A W&S policy for unilateral VS with sequential contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted MRI and audiograms during FU.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

1. Patient and radiologic VS features potentially related to growth and auditory function during a W&S policy. 2. The correlation between increase in VS volume and audiologic deterioration during FU.

RESULTS

Labyrinthine hypointensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images and complaints of hearing loss at presentation are predictive of a faster deterioration of hearing (p < 0.05). Growth during the first FU year predicts further growth. Vestibular schwannoma volume does not correlate with audiologic deterioration significantly.

CONCLUSION

Hypointensity on T2-weighted image of the affected labyrinth will result in a significant faster deterioration of hearing. Hearing loss was more profound, and hearing will deteriorate significantly faster in patients presenting with complaints of hearing loss. Significant growth during the first year of FU predicts further growth during FU. Sequential MRI cannot be substituted by audiologic examinations solely because increase in VS volume does not correlate with audiologic deterioration significantly.

Decision analysis of treatment options for vestibular schwannoma

Object

Widespread use of MR imaging has contributed to the more frequent diagnosis of vestibular schwannomas (VSs). These tumors represent 10% of primary adult intracranial neoplasms, and if they are symptomatic, they usually present with hearing loss and tinnitus. Currently, there are 3 treatment options for quality of life (QOL): wait and scan, microsurgery, and radiosurgery. In this paper, the authors' purpose is to determine which treatment modality yields the highest QOL at 5- and 10-year follow-up, considering the likelihood of recurrence and various complications.

Methods

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane online databases were searched for English-language articles published between 1990 and June 2008, containing key words relating to VS. Data were pooled to calculate the prevalence of treatment complications, tumor recurrence, and QOL with various complications. For parameters in which incidence varied with time of follow-up, the authors used meta-regression to determine the mean prevalence rates at a specified length of follow-up. A decision-analytical model was constructed to compare 5- and 10-year outcomes for a patient with a unilateral tumor and partially intact hearing. The 3 treatment options, wait and scan, microsurgery, and radiosurgery, were compared.

Results

After screening more than 2500 abstracts, the authors ultimately included 113 articles in this analysis. Recurrence, complication rates, and onset of complication varied with the treatment chosen. The relative QOL at the 5-year follow-up was 0.898 of normal for wait and scan, 0.953 for microsurgery, and 0.97 for radiosurgery. These differences are significant (p < 0.0052). Data were too scarce at the 10-year follow-up to calculate significant differences between the microsurgery and radiosurgery strategies.

Conclusions

At 5 years, patients treated with radiosurgery have an overall better QOL than those treated with either microsurgery or those investigated further with serial imaging. The authors found that the complications associated with wait-and-scan and microsurgery treatment strategies negatively impacted patient lives more than the complications from radiosurgery. One limitation of this study is that the 10-year follow-up data were too limited to analyze, and more studies are needed to determine if the authors' results are still consistent at 10 years.

Long-term hearing preservation after microsurgical excision of vestibular schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

To examine long-term hearing outcomes after microsurgical excision of vestibular schwannoma (VS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Forty-nine subjects at a single institution who had undergone microsurgical excision of a VS via middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach between 1994 and 2007 with immediate postoperative (PO) hearing preservation and for whom long-term audiograms were available.

INTERVENTION

Diagnostic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Word Recognition Score (WRS) is defined by speech discrimination scores (SDS) greater than 70% (grade I), 50% to 70% (grade II), less than 50% (grade III), and 0% (grade IV).

RESULTS

For subjects with more than 2 years of follow-up, WRS I hearing was present PO in 42 of 49 patients and was preserved at the latest follow-up in 38 (90%) of 42 patients. No subjects fell beyond WRS II. WRS I hearing was maintained in 23 (88%) of 26 patients with more than 5 years of follow-up. Postoperative WRS I to II hearing was maintained in 28 (96%) of 29 patients with more than 5 years of follow-up. The patient who lost significant hearing in the ear operated on had sensorineural hearing loss that paralleled deterioration in her ear that was not operated on.

CONCLUSION

Most subjects maintain their initial PO SDS after microsurgical VS removal, and therefore, the initial PO WRS is predictive of long-term hearing. Postsurgical changes do not alter the natural rate or pattern of progressive bilateral sensorineural hearing loss in individual subjects.

Diagnosis and therapy of vestibular schwannoma

MRI studies are of paramount importance for diagnosis and follow-up measurements during conservative and postinterventional management of vestibular schwannomas (VS). MRI findings that convey important information for hearing-preservation VS surgery are: length of tumor-cochlear nerve contact, involvement of the internal auditory canal, incomplete filling of internal auditory canal, tumor size less than 15 mm and the intralabyrinthine signal intensity on 3DFT-CISS gradient-echo images. Functional neuro-otologic studies of facial nerve function, hearing and vestibular/balance function provide a valuable means of assessment of the actual impairment of the functional status of the VS patient. Intraoperative monitoring of facial nerve function and hearing has been refined, resulting in improved final postoperative facial nerve and hearing outcomes in VS patients treated with microsurgery. Long-term results reported by teams practicing stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy have been very encouraging. On the other hand, conservative management appears to be a viable option for a select group of VS patients. The refinement of surgical technique has rendered surgery safer and less invasive, resulting in better functional outcomes. Steroid use is currently used postinterventionally to improve final hearing outcome, although with questionable effectiveness. Physical rehabilitation programs are applied to accelerate vestibular functional recovery postoperatively and there is weak evidence that early physical rehabilitation may improve the final facial nerve outcome. Quality-of-life measures have emerged as important determinants of final therapeutic decision-making. More studies with high levels of evidence are needed to support clinical decisions.

Optimal dose of stereotactic radiosurgery for acoustic neuromas: a systematic review

Radiosurgery is increasingly employed in the treatment of acoustic neuroma, but the optimal dose in terms of long-term tumour control and minimal adverse effects has not been established. We performed a systematic review of the published literature of radiosurgery of acoustic neuroma to assess whether the use of low dose radiosurgery is as effective as high dose treatment. Reports of radiosurgery for acoustic neuroma were identified through a Medline search. Studies with at least 15 patients and a median follow-up longer than 12 months were included. The relationship between actuarial 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), and tumour and treatment parameters was examined. Forty-two studies were included. Tumour control following lower radiosurgery doses was similar to that reported following high doses. Only 12 studies reported actuarial outcomes at 5 years. There was no relationship between PFS at 5 years and dose to the tumour margin. Radiosurgery of larger tumours was associated with lower 5 year PFS (p < 0.05). Although on initial inspection radiosurgery of acoustic neuroma with doses of 12 - 13 Gy seems to be as effective as higher dose treatment, the available reports are subject to a number of confounding factors, are not sufficiently statistically powered and there is only limited long-term actuarial outcome data. Currently, available studies do not provide sufficient confidence to support the claim that low dose radiosurgery is equally effective as higher doses in the long-term control of acoustic neuroma.

Suggested response criteria for phase II antitumor drug studies for neurofibromatosis type 2 related vestibular schwannoma

Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is a tumor suppressor gene syndrome characterized by multiple schwannomas, especially vestibular schwannomas (VS), and meningiomas. Anticancer drug trials are now being explored, but there are no standardized endpoints in NF2. We review the challenges of NF2 clinical trials and suggest possible response criteria for use in initial phase II studies. We suggest two main response criteria in such trials. Objective radiographic response is defined as a durable 20% or greater reduction in VS volume based on post-contrast T1-weighted MRI images collected with 3 mm or finer cuts through the internal auditory canal. Hearing response is defined as a statistically significant improvement in word recognition scores using 50-word recorded lists in audiology. A possible composite endpoint incorporating both radiographic response and hearing response is outlined. We emphasize pitfalls in response assessment and suggest guidelines to minimize misinterpretations of response. We also identify research goals in NF2 to facilitate future trial conduct, such as identifying the expectations for time to tumor progression and time to measurable hearing loss in untreated NF2-related VS, and the relation of both endpoints to patient prognostic factors (such as age, baseline tumor volume, and measures of disease severity). These data would facilitate future use of endpoints based on stability of tumor size and hearing, which might be more appropriate for testing certain drugs. We encourage adoption of standardized endpoints early in the development of phase II trials for this population to facilitate comparison of results across trials of different agents.

Conservative management of 386 cases of unilateral vestibular schwannoma: tumor growth and consequences for treatment

Object

The object of this study was to evaluate the natural history, pattern, and occurrence of tumor growth and its consequences for treatment of small-sized vestibular schwannomas (VSs).

Methods

From 1990 to 2005, 386 patients underwent conservative management for VS because of the following: age > 60 years, poor health/medical risks, risk of deterioration of good hearing, small tumor size, minimal or no incapacitating symptoms, and/or patient preference. Tumor size was measured by MR imaging according to the guidelines of the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium. The first MR imaging study was performed 1 year after diagnosis, and subsequent imaging was performed yearly or every 2 years depending on the appearance of new symptoms, tumor growth, or both.

Results

Sixty-one patients were lost to follow-up the first year after presentation. Of the 325 patients for whom 1-year follow-up data were available, 39 showed tumor growth ≥ 3 mm. Conservative management was discontinued for these 39 patients. The patients who returned for follow-up were evaluated at 1- or 2-year intervals depending on tumor growth. The authors extrapolated to obtain data for 2-year intervals, yielding data for 160, 56, 21, and 8 patients at 3, 5, 7, and 9 years after initial presentation, respectively. The overall mean tumor growth rate (±standard deviation) was 1.15 ± 2.4 mm/year. This rate was estimated by pooling all values of tumor growth that had been determined for all patients and dividing by the total number of “events,” with each assessment constituting an event. In 58.6% of patients, the annual tumor growth rate was < 1 mm/year; in 29.2%, 1–3 mm/year; and in 12.2%, ≥ 3 mm/ year. The growth rates of intrameatal (1.02 ± 1.8 mm/year) and extrameatal (1.40 ± 3.1 mm/year) tumors did not differ significantly. No significant association was found between tumor growth rate and sex, age, initial hearing status, or initial tumor grade. Delay in diagnosis was the only significant factor associated with tumor growth rate. During follow-up, conservative management was discontinued for 77 (23.7%) of the 325 patients for whom at least 12-month follow-up data were available; surgery was performed in 60 (77.9%) and radiation therapy in 17 (22.1%).

Conclusions

The results of this study support the role of a conservative “wait-and-scan” policy of management for small-sized VSs because most have a slow growth rate. Long-term neuroimaging follow-up is needed even with non-growing tumors.

Conservative versus primary surgical treatment of acoustic neuromas: a comparison of rates of facial nerve and hearing preservation

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether patients with small to medium sized acoustic neuromas managed conservatively suffer reduced rates of facial nerve and hearing preservation when compared with patients undergoing primary surgery.

DESIGN

An intention-to-treat comparison between patients managed conservatively at first presentation and those managed with primary surgery.

SETTING

Tertiary referral neurotological centre in Birmingham, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Data were drawn from our database of 487 sporadic acoustic neuromas managed from 1997 to present day.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Facial nerve status (assessed using the House-Brackmann system) was collated for all conservatively managed patients (n = 167) and compared with that expected when calculated from primarily surgically managed tumours of equivalent size (n = 121). A chi-square test was employed to test the statistical significance of any difference. Hearing preservation (maintenance of AAO-HNS Class) in patients presenting with Class A or B hearing was compared between conservatively managed patients and those with primary surgical management.

RESULTS

Observed facial nerve preservation in conservatively managed patients was significantly better (P < 0.001) than expected when calculated from rates of facial nerve preservation in surgically managed patients. Hearing preservation was also significantly more successful in conservatively managed patients (Pearson chi-square: P < 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

An initial period of conservative management is a safe and reasonable management policy in all acoustic neuromas up to 2 cm in size at the cerebello-pontine angle. Given that there are no failsafe ways of deciding potential for growth in acoustic neuromas, initial conservative management of these tumours offers superior hearing and facial nerve preservation when compared with primary surgical treatment.

Change in hearing during ‘wait and scan’ management of patients with vestibular schwannoma

Aim:

To evaluate hearing changes during ‘wait and scan’ management of patients with vestibular schwannoma.

Subjects:

Over a 10-year period, 636 patients have prospectively been allocated to ‘wait and scan’ management, with annual magnetic resonance scanning and audiological examination.

Results:

At the time of diagnosis, 334 patients (53 per cent) had good hearing and speech discrimination of better than 70 per cent; at the end of the 10-year observation period, this latter percentage was 31 per cent. In 17 per cent of the patients, speech discrimination at diagnosis was 100 per cent; of these, 88 per cent still had good hearing at the end of the observation period. However, in patients with even a small initial speech discrimination loss, only 55 per cent maintained good hearing at the end of the observation period.

Conclusion:

After comparing the hearing results of hearing preservation surgery and of radiation therapy with those of ‘wait and scan’ management, it appears that, in vestibular schwannoma patients with a small tumour and normal speech discrimination, the main indication for active treatment should be established tumour growth.

Hearing in patients with intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas

This paper reports data on the spontaneous course of hearing in 156 patients with purely intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas. The mean pure tone average (PTA) was 51 dB HL and the mean speech discrimination score (SDS) 60% at diagnosis. The risk of a significant subsequent hearing loss (>or=10 dB PTA or >or=10% SDS) was 54% during 4.6 years of observation. Patients with normal speech discrimination at diagnosis had a significantly smaller risk of loosing hearing. The hearing loss at diagnosis and during observation was not related to age, gender, diagnostic tumor size, tumor- induced expansion of the internal auditory canal or tumor sublocalization (fundus, central or porus). However, the loss of PTA was smaller in shrinking tumors and the PTA deterioration rate correlated with the volumetric tumor growth rate. After 4.6 years observation, the PTA had increased by 14 dB to 65 dB HL, and the SDS reduced by 17% to 43%. The proportion of patients eligible for hearing preservation treatment as determined by word recognition score class I (70-100% SDS) was reduced to 28% (a 44% reduction), and by AAO-HNS class A to 9% (a 53% reduction).

Vestibular schwannoma management: What is the 'best' option?

There is an abundance of medical literature describing the management options for vestibular schwannomas. However, the lack of high quality clinical trials means that, for any individual patient, the decision is often based on the clinician's personal biases. The management options that are available are conservative treatment, surgery, single-dose stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated radiotherapy. In this review, we set out what the aims of managing a vestibular schwannoma should be and compare how these different treatment modalities perform. The particular objectives of tumour control, cranial nerve preservation, prevention of malignancy, quality of life and cost-effectiveness are discussed. It remains difficult to differentiate between these methods when more than one is suitable; the literature confirms that they are all safe and effective, but the decision must be the patient's, based on their individual priorities. This review should equip the clinician to provide an informed overview of the options.

Unilateral Acoustic Neuromas: Long-Term Hearing Results in Patients Managed with Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy, Hearing Preservation Surgery, and Expectantly

INTRODUCTION

Hearing preservation is invariably a consideration when exploring treatment options for acoustic neuromas. We reviewed the long-term hearing results of patients who were treated using 1) hyperfractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSR), 2) hearing preservation tumor excision surgery (HPTES), and 3) expectantly (no treatment).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Single institution retrospective chart review of 42 patients managed with HSR (1993-2003), 113 patients in whom HPTES was carried out, and 86 patients who were untreated (1974-2003). Hearing levels were graded according to the Gardner-Robertson classification.

RESULTS

The percent of patients managed with HSR initially who had serviceable hearing (class 1-2) was 68.8%. This fell to 6.7% in the follow-up interval. Of the group treated with HPTES, 100% had preoperative serviceable hearing. This dropped to 15.9% in the follow-up interval. The percent of patients managed expectantly who initially had serviceable hearing was 77.3%. This dropped to 33.3% during the follow-up interval. Mean follow-up periods were 4.0, 9.5, and 6.8 years in the HSR, HPTES, and expectant groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Hearing acuity statistically worsened over the long term (P < .01) in all three groups. There was a significant proportion of patients in whom hearing deteriorated from serviceable to nonserviceable hearing (P < .01) during the follow-up interval. The decline was most significant in the groups treated with HPTES and HSR compared with the group treated expectantly (P < .05). Hearing outcomes, in our experience, continue to be poor, but this is especially so in patients treated with HPTES or HSR.

Quality of life following microsurgery, radiosurgery and conservative management for unilateral vestibular schwannoma

The best way to manage small and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas is currently a matter of heated debate. As these tumours are not immediately life-threatening, patients are invariably concerned about how management would affect their quality of life. Until now, no study has compared the three treatment modalities in terms of physical, psychological and social wellbeing. This study is based on a retrospective database analysis and postal questionnaire survey of unilateral vestibular schwannoma patients who had either been managed conservatively, or treated with microsurgery or radiosurgery. The results showed that: quality of life (measured by the Glasgow Benefit Inventory) deteriorated after microsurgery, particularly for small tumours; conservative management did not lead to a change in quality of life, and there was a trend towards poorer quality of life following radiosurgery. The findings suggest that a conservative management approach may be more appropriate for small tumours, and that patients who are due to undergo microsurgery or radiosurgery may benefit from counselling about the potential impact of treatment on quality of life.

Hearing deterioration in patients with a non-growing vestibular schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to document and analyse the course of several audiometric parameters in 49 patients with a non-growing unilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients received conservative management and absence of tumour growth was ascertained by means of serial magnetic imaging studies. Pure-tone audiometry and speech audiometry were performed at yearly intervals.

RESULTS

Pure-tone audiometry revealed a significant increase in thresholds at all frequencies, except for 8.0 kHz. The maximum yearly threshold increase was 2.4 dB hearing level at 1.0 and 2.0 kHz. Speech audiometry revealed a significant decrease in maximum discrimination over the course of time. No significant changes were observed in the following parameters: the intensity level at which maximum discrimination was achieved; the roll-over index; the speech reception threshold; and the slope of the curve in the speech audiogram. No change was observed in the relation between pure-tone audiometry thresholds and speech audiometry scores. Apparently, the deterioration of pure-tone perception and speech discrimination ran parallel courses.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that hearing loss is a predominant symptom in patients with a non-growing VS, as is also known in patients with a growing lesion. Moreover, it seems unlikely that the hearing loss in VS patients is merely the result of mechanical influences on retrocochlear neural or vascular structures.

Sequential volume mapping for confirmation of negative growth in vestibular schwannomas treated by gamma knife radiosurgery

Object. The purpose of this study was to confirm, by using a sequential volume mapping (SVM) technique, that gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) induces negative growth in vestibular schwannomas (VS).

Methods. Over a period of 5 years, 126 small- to medium-sized (< 15 cm3) VSs were treated using microradiosurgical techniques within a standard protocol. All patient data were collected prospectively. Sequential magnetic resonance imaging was performed every 6 months to assess the volume of the tumor, based on specially developed GammaPlan software. The mean follow-up duration was 22 months. At least three SVM measurements were obtained in 91 patients and at least four were obtained in 62 patients. The mean number of SVM measurements for each patient was 2.54. After GKS, the following patterns of volume change were seen: 1) 57 VSs showed transient increase in volume with a peak at 6 months, followed by shrinkage. Four VSs exhibited prolonged swelling beyond 24 months. Transient swelling and eventual shrinkage were independent of the initial VS volume; 2) 29 VSs showed direct volume shri6nkage without swelling; and 3) five VSs showed persistent volume increase. All volume changes were greater than 10%. The overall mean volume reduction was 46.8% at 30 months.

Conclusions. Sequential volume mapping appears to be superior to conventional two-dimensional measurements in monitoring volume changes in VS after GKS. It confirms that transient swelling is common. Ninety-two percent of tumors responded by showing significant volume shrinkage (mean 46.8%). It would seem that GKS can induce volume reduction in VS.