1
|
de Geer A, Brouwer de Koning S, van Alphen M, van der Mierden S, Zuur C, van Leeuwen F, Loeve A, van Veen R, Karakullukcu M. Registration methods for surgical navigation of the mandible: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022; 51:1318-1329. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
2
|
Application of an open position splint integrated with a reference frame and registration markers for mandibular navigation surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 49:686-690. [PMID: 31601471 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Navigation surgery plays an important role in modern craniomaxillofacial surgery, but it is difficult to apply navigation surgery to the mandible, due to its mobility. At present, headbands or headpins are widely used for fixation of the reference frame, and three strategies are generally used for the application of navigation surgery to the mandible. This article reports the application of a novel open position splint integrated with a reference frame and registration markers for mandibular navigation surgery as a fourth strategy. Using this custom-made integrated splint, a marker-based pair-point registration procedure was completed easily and non-invasively. Furthermore, the neurovascular canal tract could be easily identified, and the cyst, as well as the surrounding daughter cysts, could be removed with high accuracy. This strategy has potential for widespread clinical application in mandibular navigation surgery.
Collapse
|
3
|
Intraoperative Image-Guided Navigation in Craniofacial Surgery: Review and Grading of the Current Literature. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30:465-472. [PMID: 30640846 DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000005130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Image-guided navigation has existed for nearly 3 decades, but its adoption to craniofacial surgery has been slow. A systematic review of the literature was performed to assess the current status of navigation in craniofacial surgery. METHODS A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) systematic review of the Medline and Web of Science databases was performed using a series of search terms related to Image-Guided Navigation and Craniofacial Surgery. Titles were then filtered for relevance and abstracts were reviewed for content. Single case reports were excluded as were animal, cadaver, and virtual data. Studies were categorized based on the type of study performed and graded using the Jadad scale and the Newcastle-Ottawa scales, when appropriate. RESULTS A total of 2030 titles were returned by our search criteria. Of these, 518 abstracts were reviewed, 208 full papers were evaluated, and 104 manuscripts were ultimately included in the study. A single randomized controlled trial was identified (Jadad score 3), and 12 studies were identified as being case control or case cohort studies (Average Newcastle-Ottawa score 6.8) The most common application of intraoperative surgical navigation cited was orbital surgery (n = 36), followed by maxillary surgery (n = 19). Higher quality studies more commonly pertained to the orbit (6/13), and consistently show improved results. CONCLUSION Image guided surgical navigation improves outcomes in orbital reconstruction. Although image guided navigation has promise in many aspects of craniofacial surgery, current literature is lacking and future studies addressing this paucity of data are needed before universal adoption can be recommended.
Collapse
|
4
|
Bittermann G, Ermer M, Voss P, Duttenhoefer F, Zimmerer R, Schmelzeisen R, Metzger MC. Comparison of virtual and titanium clip marking of tumour resection margins for improved radiation planning in head and neck cancer surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 44:1468-73. [PMID: 26265065 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2015] [Revised: 06/09/2015] [Accepted: 07/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- G Bittermann
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - M Ermer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - P Voss
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - F Duttenhoefer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - R Zimmerer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - R Schmelzeisen
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M C Metzger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gerbino G, Zavattero E, Berrone M, Berrone S. Management of needle breakage using intraoperative navigation following inferior alveolar nerve block. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 71:1819-24. [PMID: 24135518 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2013] [Revised: 07/15/2013] [Accepted: 07/17/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
This report describes a peculiar case of needle breakage during inferior alveolar nerve block to perform third molar extraction that was removed with the aid of a BrainLAB VectorVision neuronavigation system. This report adds to the currently limited scientific literature on the image-guided removal of foreign bodies from the oral cavity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Gerbino
- Assistant Professor, Division of Maxillofacial Surgery, Head and Neck Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guijarro-Martínez R, Gellrich NC, Witte J, Tapioles D, von Briel C, Kolotas C, Achinger J, Hailemariam S, Schulte H, Rohner D, Hammer B. Optimization of the interface between radiology, surgery, radiotherapy, and pathology in head and neck tumor surgery: a navigation-assisted multidisciplinary network. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 43:156-62. [PMID: 24100154 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2012] [Revised: 07/22/2013] [Accepted: 09/03/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
A navigation-assisted multidisciplinary network to improve the interface between radiology, surgery, radiotherapy, and pathology in the field of head and neck cancer is described. All implicated fields are integrated by a common server platform and have remote data access in a ready-to-use format. The margins of resection and exact locations of biopsies are mapped intraoperatively. The pathologist uses the numerical coordinates of these samples to precisely trace each specimen in the anatomical field. Subsequently, map-guided radiotherapy is planned. In addition to the benefits of image-guided resection, this model enables radiotherapy planning according to the specific coordinates of the resection defect plus any residually affected sites identified by the pathologist. Irradiation of adjacent healthy structures is thereby minimized. In summary, the navigation-assisted network described grants timely multidisciplinary feedback between all fields involved, attains meticulous pathological definition, and permits optimized coordinate-directed radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - N-C Gellrich
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - J Witte
- Brainlab AG, Feldkirchen, Germany
| | - D Tapioles
- Hirslanden Head Office, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - C von Briel
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hirslanden Medical Center, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - C Kolotas
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hirslanden Medical Center, Aarau, Switzerland
| | | | - S Hailemariam
- Department of Pathology, Hirslanden Medical Center, Aarau, Switzerland
| | | | - D Rohner
- Craniofacial Center (CFC), Hirslanden Medical Center, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - B Hammer
- Craniofacial Center (CFC), Hirslanden Medical Center, Aarau, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Reconstruction of Complex Mandibular Defect With Computer-Aided Navigation and Orthognathic Surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24:e229-33. [DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e3182869b00] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
8
|
Kang SH, Kim MK, Kim JH, Park HK, Lee SH, Park W. The Validity of Marker Registration for an Optimal Integration Method in Mandibular Navigation Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 71:366-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2011] [Revised: 03/30/2012] [Accepted: 03/31/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
9
|
Bettschart C, Kruse A, Matthews F, Zemann W, Obwegeser JA, Grätz KW, Lübbers HT. Point-to-point registration with mandibulo-maxillary splint in open and closed jaw position. Evaluation of registration accuracy for computer-aided surgery of the mandible. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012; 40:592-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2011] [Revised: 10/06/2011] [Accepted: 10/10/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
10
|
Using intravenous cannula as a guide for arch bar stabilization wire in intermaxillary fixation. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22:1543-4. [PMID: 21778864 DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31821da2f7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
11
|
A Simple and Flexible Concept for Computer-Navigated Surgery of the Mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69:924-30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2009] [Accepted: 01/12/2010] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
12
|
|
13
|
Lübbers HT, Jacobsen C, Matthews F, Grätz KW, Kruse A, Obwegeser JA. Surgical Navigation in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery: Expensive Toy or Useful Tool? A Classification of Different Indications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69:300-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2010] [Revised: 05/27/2010] [Accepted: 07/01/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
14
|
Lo J, Xia JJ, Zwahlen RA, Cheung LK. Surgical Navigation in Correction of Hemimandibular Hyperplasia: A New Treatment Strategy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68:1444-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2009] [Revised: 10/28/2009] [Accepted: 11/03/2009] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
15
|
Eggers G, Kress B, Rohde S, Mühling J. Intraoperative computed tomography and automated registration for image-guided cranial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38:28-33. [PMID: 19114421 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/26098099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Two key problems for the use of navigation systems in image-guided surgery are accurate patient-to-image registration and the fact that with ongoing surgery the patient's anatomy is altered while the image data remains unchanged. A system for intraoperative CT imaging and fully automated registration of this image addresses both problems. It had been evaluated successfully in phantom studies. In this clinical study, we assessed the impact of the system on intraoperative workflow and registration accuracy in everyday patient care. METHODS In ten patients who underwent image-guided surgery, CT image data were acquired intraoperatively and were automatically registered in the navigation system. Registration accuracy and surgical outcome were assessed clinically. In six of these patients, a maxillary splint with markers had been inserted to cross-check registration accuracy. The target registration error of these markers was measured. RESULTS In all cases, registration accuracy was clinically sufficient and the surgical task could be performed successfully. In those cases where a maxillary template with target markers was attached for additional control of the registration accuracy, the target registration error was always better than 2 mm. Automated registration reduced the intraoperative registration time considerably and partially compensated for the time needed to perform the image data acquisition. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative CT imaging and automated registration successfully address the two key problems of image-guided surgery. The method is robust and accurate and proved its usability in everyday patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Eggers
- Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Casap N, Wexler A, Eliashar R. Computerized navigation for surgery of the lower jaw: comparison of 2 navigation systems. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66:1467-75. [PMID: 18571032 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2005] [Revised: 01/23/2006] [Accepted: 06/14/2006] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy and applicability of 2 computerized navigation systems for surgery of the lower jaw. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two patients diagnosed with a mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lower jaw were prepared for tumor resection applying 2 different computerized navigation systems: the Image-Guided Implantology (IGI) system (DenX Advanced Dental Systems, Moshav Ora, Israel), which is specialized for dental implant surgery and the LandmarX system (Medtronic Xomed, Inc, Jacksonville, FL), which is designed for ear, nose, and throat surgery. Intraoperative accuracy of navigation of each of the systems was evaluated from the precision of targeting of distinctive anatomical landmarks in the mandible, including a preoperatively placed titanium screw. RESULTS The navigational error of the IGI system was less than 0.5 mm, while that of the LandmarX system was between 3 mm and 4 mm. Tumor resection was performed with the guidance of the IGI system, and resulted in complete resection with tumor-free margins. CONCLUSIONS The mobile nature of the lower jaw complicates its synchronization during surgery with the preacquired imaging data. The accuracy of navigation based on tracking of the patient's head is compromised by asynchronous movements of the mandible during surgery. Direct tracking of the lower jaw, via a teeth-mounted sensor frame, is superior to its indirect tracking. The teeth also provide a more secure basis for the fiducial markers than soft tissue attachment. We conclude that a computerized navigation system using a teeth-mounted sensor frame and teeth-supported fiducial markers enables more accurate navigation for surgery of the lower jaw.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nardy Casap
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, The Hebrew University-Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hoffmann J, Westendorff C, Gomez-Roman G, Reinert S. Accuracy of navigation-guided socket drilling before implant installation compared to the conventional free-hand method in a synthetic edentulous lower jaw model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16:609-14. [PMID: 16164469 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01153.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
In this study, the three-dimensional (3D) accuracy of navigation-guided (NG) socket drilling before implant installation was compared to the conventional free-hand (CF) method in a synthetic edentulous lower jaw model. The drillings were performed by two surgeons with different years of working experience. The inter-individual outcome was assessed. NG drillings were performed using an optical computerized tomography (CT)-based navigation system. CF drillings were performed using a surgical template. The coordinates of the drilled sockets were determined on the basis of CT scans. A total of n=224 drillings was evaluated. Inter-individual differences in terms of the surgeons' years of work experience were without statistical significance. The mean deviation of the CF drilled sockets (n=112) on the vestibulo-oral and mesio-distal direction was 11.2+/-5.6 degrees (range: 4.1-25.3 degrees ). With respect to the NG drilled sockets (n=112), the mean deviation was 4.2+/-1.8 degrees (range: 2.3-11.5). The mean distance to the mandibular canal was 1.1+/-0.6 mm (range: 0.1-2.3 mm) for CF-drilled sockets and 0.7+/-0.5 mm (range: 0.1-1.8 mm) for NG drilled sockets. The differences between the two methods were highly significant (P<0.01). A potential benefit from image-data-based navigation in implant surgery is discussed against the background of cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jürgen Hoffmann
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|