Cost-effectiveness and choice of infant transport systems

Structured Referral Call Handling Process Improves Neonatal Transport Dispatch Times

OBJECTIVE

 In 2019 the Southern Alberta Neonatal Transport Service adopted a transport call handling process change to expedite transport team mobilization. This study compares the impact of this change on neonatal transport decision to dispatch and mobilization times.

STUDY DESIGN

 This retrospective cohort study was conducted using a historical cohort of neonates referred for transportation between January 2017 and December 2021. The "dispatch time" (DT) was the time from the start of consultation to the time a decision to dispatch the transport team was made, whereas "mobilization time" (MT) referred to the time from start of consultation to the time the team departed the home base. In 2019, a DT target of <3 minutes was implemented to meet a target MT of <15 and <30 minutes for emergent and urgent high-risk transport referral calls, respectively. In 2021 use of the "Situation" component of the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) communication tool was introduced with the transport team asking five questions to determine need for mobilization. Data between 2017 and 2018 represented the preintervention period, 2019, the "washout" period for implementation, and 2020 to 2021, the postintervention period. Data were analyzed to determine trends in DT and MT.

RESULTS

 The DT was reduced from a median of 5 to 3 minutes following intervention (p < 0.001). DT target goal of 3 minutes was achieved in 67.08% of calls compared with 26.24% in the preintervention period, (p < 0.001). The team achieved MT target goals in 42.71% of urgent and emergent transfers compared with 18.05% prior to intervention (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

 Introduction of a time-sensitive referral call handling process improved dispatch and mobilization time of the neonatal transport team.

KEY POINTS

· Time-sensitive triaging of neonatal transport referrals improves dispatch and mobilization time.. · A structured referral call handling process improves the efficiency of neonatal transport decision-making.. · Dedicated neonatal transport vehicles are likely to improve neonatal transport mobilization time..

Evaluation of transport-related outcomes for neonatal transport teams with and without physicians

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate if the presence of a physician in the neonatal transport team (NTT) affects transport-related outcomes and procedural success.

Design

Retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching.

Setting

Canadian national study.

Patients

Neonatal transports from nontertiary centres between January 2014 and December 2017.

Interventions

Comparison of transports conducted by NTTs with physicians (MD Group) and without physicians (noMD Group).

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was the change in patient acuity as measured by the transport risk index of physiologic severity (TRIPS) score. Secondary outcomes included mortality within 24 hours of NICU admission, clinical complications during transport, procedural success, and stabilization time.

Results

Among 9,703 eligible cases, 899 neonatal transports attended by NTTs with physicians were compared to 899 neonatal transports without physicians using propensity score matching. No differences were seen in the improvement of TRIPS score or mortality ≤24 hours of NICU admission. The MD Group had more clinical complications (7.7% versus 5.0%, P=0.02). No differences were seen in success rates of invasive procedures. The MD Group had shorter stabilization times. In multivariable analysis, the MD Group was not a significant predictor for the improvement in TRIPS score after adjustment for covariates.

Conclusions

Neonatal transports conducted by teams including physicians compared to teams without physicians, did not have higher improvement in TRIPS scores and had similar success rates for procedures. These results provide insights for the planning of the structure and training of specialized interfacility neonatal transport programs.

Fifty Years of Progress in Neonatal and Maternal Transport for Specialty Care

Specialty care for preterm and critically ill infants has evolved over many years. Neonatal intensive care nurseries were developed, and physicians and nurses learned how to provide intensive care for these infants. Neonatal and maternal (in utero) transport to tertiary centers became common in regionalized systems of care to facilitate the specialized care of high-risk neonates when childbirth occurred in settings without specialized personnel or equipment. Annually, nearly 70,000 neonatal transports occur in the United States. Although specialty care helps reduce rates of neonatal mortality, racial disparities and disparities between urban and rural areas exist. The purpose of this article is to review the progress achieved in neonatal and maternal transport over the past 50 years. The knowledge developed can be used to improve the care provided to women, their fetuses, and infants.

Impact of transport on arrival status and outcomes in newborns with heart disease: a low-middle-income country perspective

OBJECTIVES

We sought to systematically study determinants of "clinical status at arrival after transport" of neonates with CHD and its impact on clinical outcomes in a low- and middle-income country environment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive neonates with CHD (n = 138) transported (median distance 138 km; 5-425 km) to a paediatric cardiac programme in Southern India were studied prospectively. Among 138 neonatal transports, 134 were in ambulances. Four neonates were transported by family in private vehicles; 60% with duct-dependent circulation (n = 57) were transported without prostaglandin E1. Clinical status at arrival after transport was assessed using California modification of TRIPS Score (Ca-TRIPS), evidence of end-organ injury and metabolic insult.Upon arrival, 42% had end-organ injury, 24% had metabolic insult and 36% had Ca-TRIPS Score >25. Prior to surgery or catheter intervention, prolonged ICU stay (>48 hours), prolonged ventilation (>48 hours), blood stream sepsis, and death occurred in 48, 15, 19, and 3.6%, respectively. Ca-TRIPS Score >25 was significantly associated with mortality (p = 0.005), sepsis (p = 0.035), and prolonged ventilation (p < 0.001); end-organ injury with prolonged ICU stay (p = 0.031) and ventilation (p = 0.045); metabolic insult with mortality (p = 0.012) and sepsis (p = 0.015).Fifteen babies needed only medical management, 10 received comfort care (due to severe end-organ injury in 3), 107 underwent cardiac surgery (n = 83) or catheter intervention (n = 24), with a mortality of 6.5%. Clinical status at arrival after transport did not impact post-procedure outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Neonates with CHD often arrive in suboptimal status after transport in low- and middle-income countries resulting in adverse clinical outcomes. Robust transport systems need to be integrated in plans to develop newborn heart surgery in low- and middle-income countries.

Neonatal transport metrics and quality improvement in a regional transport service

Sick neonates in non-tertiary centers rely on the expert skills of neonatal transport teams (NTTs) and efficient systems to provide safe and timely transport to tertiary centers. Quality metrics to measure and compare performance among transport teams are essential to ensure delivery of high-quality care and efficient use of limited and costly resources. We review the most relevant quality metrics available in neonatal transport and key issues to consider during their utilization. The use of quality metrics for quality improvement is described through the experience of a neonatal transport program based at a quaternary children's hospital in Canada.

Outcome of outborn infants at the borderline of viability in Western Australia: A retrospective cohort study

AIM

Preterm infants have a high risk of morbidity and mortality, which increases with decreasing gestational age. Inborn infants (infants born in tertiary perinatal centres) have higher survival and lower morbidity than outborn infants. We aimed to compare short-term and 1-year developmental outcomes of outborn infants at the borderline of viability (≥23 to ≤25 + 6 weeks gestation) with a similar cohort of inborn infants in the sole tertiary perinatal centre in Western Australia from 2001 to 2011.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. Outborn infants ≥23 to ≤25 + 6 weeks gestation who survived to be transported to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in the perinatal centre were contemporaneously matched to the next inborn infant of comparable gestation and birth weight. We compared mortality, morbidity (including intraventricular haemorrhage, necrotising enterocolitis and chronic lung disease) and Griffiths General Quotient scores at 1-year corrected age.

RESULTS

There were 54 outborn and 519 inborn births in the gestational age range during the study period. Thirty-five (65%) outborn infants were transported to the NICU. Of the outborn infants, 21/54 (39%) survived to discharge compared with 375/519 (72%) inborn infants. For the 35 outborn infants transported to NICU, 14 (40%) died, compared with 6/35 (17%) of inborn infants. There were no differences in short-term and developmental outcomes in surviving infants.

CONCLUSIONS

Outborn extremely preterm infants <26 weeks gestation have higher mortality than inborn counterparts. However, those transported to a tertiary NICU have similar morbidity and developmental outcomes.

Specialist teams for neonatal transport to neonatal intensive care units for prevention of morbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND

Maternal antenatal transfers provide better neonatal outcomes. However, there will inevitably be some infants who require acute transport to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Because of this, many institutions develop services to provide neonatal transport by specially trained health personnel. However, few studies report on relevant clinical outcomes in infants requiring transport to NICU.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of specialist transport teams compared with non-specialist transport teams on the risk of neonatal mortality and morbidity among high-risk newborn infants requiring transport to neonatal intensive care.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2015, Issue 7), MEDLINE (1966 to 31 July 2015), EMBASE (1980 to 31 July 2015), CINAHL (1982 to 31 July 2015), conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials.

STUDY DESIGN

randomised, quasi-randomised or cluster randomised controlled trials.

POPULATION

neonates requiring transport to a neonatal intensive care unit.

INTERVENTION

transport by a specialist team compared to a non-specialist team.

OUTCOMES

any of the following outcomes - death; adverse events during transport leading to respiratory compromise; and condition on admission to the neonatal intensive care unit.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The methodological quality of the trials was assessed using the information provided in the studies and by personal communication with the author. Data on relevant outcomes were extracted and the effect size estimated and reported as risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) or number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes. Data from cluster randomised trials were not combined for analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

One trial met the inclusion criteria of this review but was considered ineligible owing to serious bias in the reporting of the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no reliable evidence from randomised trials to support or refute the effects of specialist neonatal transport teams for neonatal retrieval on infant morbidity and mortality. Cluster randomised trial study designs may be best suited to provide us with answers on effectiveness and clinical outcomes.

Estimating the quality of neonatal transport in California

OBJECTIVE

To develop a strategy to assess the quality of neonatal transport based on change in neonatal condition during transport.

STUDY DESIGN

The Canadian Transport Risk Index of Physiologic Stability (TRIPS) score was optimized for a California (Ca) population using data collected on 21 279 acute neonatal transports, 2007 to 2009, using models predicting (2/3) and validating (1/3) mortality within 7 days of transport. Quality Change Point 10th percentile (QCP10), a benchmark of the greatest deterioration seen in 10% of the transports by top-performing teams, was established.

RESULT

Compared with perinatal variables (0.79), the Ca-TRIPS had a validation receiver operator characteristic area for prediction of death of 0.88 in all infants and 0.86 in infants transported after day 7. The risk of death increased 2.4-fold in infants whose deterioration exceeded the QCP10.

CONCLUSION

We present a practical, benchmarked, risk-adjusted, estimate of the quality of neonatal transport.

Noninvasive Monitoring during Interhospital Transport of Newborn Infants

The main indications for interhospital neonatal transports are radiographic studies (e.g., magnet resonance imaging) and surgical interventions. Specialized neonatal transport teams need to be skilled in patient care, communication, and equipment management and extensively trained in resuscitation, stabilization, and transport of critically ill infants. However, there is increasing evidence that clinical assessment of heart rate, color, or chest wall movements is imprecise and can be misleading even in experienced hands. The aim of the paper was to review the current evidence on clinical monitoring equipment during interhospital neonatal transport.

Regionalized neonatal emergency transport

This article reviews the components that facilitate an effective neonatal emergency transport network, and discusses the human resources required for safe transport, including a section focused on the option of an expanded role for the paramedic. In addition, the topics of transport equipment, communications, quality assurance, data management, family support and education are addressed in the context of a neonatal transport programme. Finally, elements involved in the organization of neonatal transport and transport issues pertaining to networking of neonatal medical care are highlighted and illustrated with reference to local experience in British Columbia.

The benefit of preterm birth at tertiary care centers is related to gestational age

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between gestational age and outcomes of outborn versus inborn preterm infants.

STUDY DESIGN

Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine gestational age-specific, risk-adjusted outcomes of 2962 singleton infants who were born at <32 weeks of gestation who were admitted to 17 Canadian neonatal intensive care units from 1996 through 1997.

RESULTS

The risk-adjusted incidence was significantly (P <.05) higher among outborn versus inborn infants for mortality rates (odds ratio, 2.2) and > or =grade 3 intraventricular hemorrhage (odds ratio, 2.1) at < or =26 weeks of gestation and for chronic lung disease (odds ratio, 1.7) at 27 to 29 weeks of gestation. Outcomes of outborn and inborn infants at 30 to 31 weeks of gestation were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

The short-term benefit of preterm birth at tertiary centers is related inversely to gestational age and may not extend beyond 29 weeks of gestation.