Second operation after the failure of previous resection for epilepsy

Travelling waves reveal a dynamic seizure source in human focal epilepsy

Treatment of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy relies upon accurate seizure localization. Ictal activity captured by intracranial EEG has traditionally been interpreted to suggest that the underlying cortex is actively involved in seizures. Here, we hypothesize that such activity instead reflects propagated activity from a relatively focal seizure source, even during later time points when ictal activity is more widespread. We used the time differences observed between ictal discharges in adjacent electrodes to estimate the location of the hypothesized focal source and demonstrated that the seizure source, localized in this manner, closely matches the clinically and neurophysiologically determined brain region giving rise to seizures. Moreover, we determined this focal source to be a dynamic entity that moves and evolves over the time course of a seizure. Our results offer an interpretation of ictal activity observed by intracranial EEG that challenges the traditional conceptualization of the seizure source.

Laser interstitial thermal therapy after failed anterior temporal lobectomy and amygdalohippocampectomy can improve seizure outcome

Anterior temporal lobectomy and amygdalohippocampectomy (ATL) is the gold standard surgical treatment for drug resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE). Nevertheless, seizure recurrence after ATL is not uncommon. Insufficient resection of the mesial temporal structures remains one of the most common reasons for ATL failure. Extending the resection leads to improved seizure outcome in a majority of patients. However, repeat craniotomy can be higher risk for the patient and also can be technically challenging due to scarring and altered anatomy. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a novel minimally invasive alternative to ATL, and it has been shown to be safe and effective. However, it is unclear if LITT has a role in managing post-ATL mTLE patients with recurrent seizures and residual epileptogenic structures. LITT is an attractive option for post-ATL patients with residual mesial structures because the surgery is minimally invasive, and it allows precise targeting and real time confirmation of tissue ablation under MRI guidance. We present a case of an mTLE patient with recurrent seizures after ATL who achieved long-term seizure-freedom after successfully undergoing LITT to ablate the residual hippocampus. This approach, if demonstrated to be safe, effective and durable, can benefit select post-ATL mTLE patients.

•

Persistent seizures at long-term follow-up after anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is not uncommon.

•

Residual mesial temporal lobe is one of the most common reasons for seizure recurrence after ATL.

•

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive surgery with advantages of intraoperative MRI guidance.

•

LITT can be used to selectively ablate residual mesial temporal structures in post-ATL patients with recurrent seizures.

Long-term outcomes of reoperations in epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

To analyze longitudinal seizure outcomes following epilepsy surgery, including reoperations, in patients with intractable focal epilepsy.

METHODS

Clinicoradiological characteristics of patients who underwent epilepsy surgery from 1995 to 2016 with follow-up of ≥1 year were reviewed. In patients undergoing reoperations, the latest resection was considered the index surgery. The primary outcome was complete seizure freedom (Engel I) at last follow-up. Potentially significant outcome variables were first identified using univariate analyses and then fit in multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Of 898 patients fulfilling study criteria, 110 had reoperations; 92 had one resection prior to the index surgery and 18 patients had two or more prior resective surgeries. Two years after the index surgery, 69% of patients with no prior surgeries had an Engel score of I, as opposed to only 42% of those with one prior surgery, and 33% of those with two or more prior resections (P < .001). Among surgical outcome predictors, the number of prior epilepsy surgeries, female sex, lesional initial magnetic resonance imaging, no prior history of generalization, and pathology correlated with better seizure outcomes on univariate analysis. However, only sex (P = .011), history of generalization (P = .016), and number of prior surgeries (P = .002) remained statistically significant in the multivariate model.

SIGNIFICANCE

Although long-term seizure control is possible in patients with failed prior epilepsy surgery, the chances of success diminish with every subsequent resection. Outcome is additionally determined by inherent biological markers (sex and secondary generalization tendency), rather than traditional outcome predictors, supporting a hypothesis of "surgical refractoriness."

Rates and predictors of success and failure in repeat epilepsy surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Medically refractory epilepsy is a debilitating disorder that is particularly challenging to treat in patients who have already failed a surgical resection. Evidence regarding outcomes of further epilepsy surgery is limited to small case series and reviews. Therefore, our group performed the first quantitative meta-analysis of the literature from the past 30 years to assess for rates and predictors of successful reoperations.

METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted for studies reporting outcomes of repeat epilepsy surgery. Studies were excluded if they reported fewer than five eligible patients or had average follow-ups < 1 year, and patients were excluded from analysis if they received a nonresective intervention. Outcomes were stratified by each variable of interest, and quantitative meta-analysis was performed to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Seven hundred eighty-two patients who received repeat resective epilepsy surgery from 36 studies were included. Engel I outcome was observed in 47% (n = 369) of patients. Significant predictors of seizure freedom included congruent over noncongruent electrophysiology data (OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.6-8.2), lesional over nonlesional epilepsy (OR = 3.2, 95% CI = 1.9-5.3), and surgical limitations over disease-related factors associated with failure of the first surgery (OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.3-5.3). Among patients with at least one of these predictors, seizure freedom was achieved in 58%. Conversely, the use of invasive monitoring was associated with worse outcome (OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.9). Temporal lobe over extratemporal/multilobe resection (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.8-3.0) and abnormal over normal preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 0.6-5.4) showed nonsignificant trends toward seizure freedom.

SIGNIFICANCE

This analysis supports considering further resection in patients with intractable epilepsy who continue to have debilitating seizures after an initial surgery, especially in the context of factors predictive of a favorable outcome.

[Invasive stimulation procedures and EEG diagnostics in epilepsy]

Stimulation has been performed experimentally and in small case series to treat epilepsy since the 1970s. Since the introduction of vagus nerve stimulation in 1997 and intracranial stimulation methods in 2011 into patient care, invasive stimulation has become a rapidly developing but infrequently used therapeutic option in Europe. Whereas vagus nerve stimulation is frequently used, particularly in the USA, intracranial stimulation differs in its regional availability. In order to improve the efficacy of stimulation, develop criteria for its use and assure low complication rates, a concentration on experienced centers and multicenter data acquisition and sharing are needed.Invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring with subdural electrodes and especially with stereotactically implanted depth electrodes have been used increasingly more often for presurgical evaluation in recent years. They are applied when non-invasive diagnostics show insufficient results to exactly identify the location and extent of the epileptogenic zone or cannot be adequately distinguished from eloquent cortex areas. Complications include intracranial hemorrhage, infections and increased intracranial pressure but lasting deficits or even death are rare (≤2 %). The outcome of invasive monitoring is inferior to non-invasive monitoring because of the higher degree of complexity of the cases; however, it is far superior to the seizure-free rates achieved by anticonvulsant drug treatment alone.

Placement of subdural grids in pediatric patients: technique and results

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to describe common indications and technique for the application of chronic invasive electrodes in the pediatric patient suffering from medically intractable epilepsy.

METHODS

This chapter was prepared based on a retrospective review of the literature and personal experience based from a large tertiary epilepsy center.

CONCLUSIONS

Invasive subdural recordings are a safe and efficacious tool to identify the epileptogenic zone and its relationship to functional cortex in highly selected patients with medically refractory epilepsy. The ability to localize the EZ approaches 90 to 100 %, but seizure-free outcome is more complex depending greatly on the experience of the surgical team and the extent of resection.

Temporal lobe epilepsy surgery failures: a review

Patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) are refractory to antiepileptic drugs in about 30% of cases. Surgical treatment has been shown to be beneficial for the selected patients but fails to provide a seizure-free outcome in 20–30% of TLE patients. Several reasons have been identified to explain these surgical failures. This paper will address the five most common causes of TLE surgery failure (a) insufficient resection of epileptogenic mesial temporal structures, (b) relapse on the contralateral mesial temporal lobe, (c) lateral temporal neocortical epilepsy, (d) coexistence of mesial temporal sclerosis and a neocortical lesion (dual pathology); and (e) extratemporal lobe epilepsy mimicking TLE or temporal plus epilepsy. Persistence of epileptogenic mesial structures in the posterior temporal region and failure to distinguish mesial and lateral temporal epilepsy are possible causes of seizure persistence after TLE surgery. In cases of dual pathology, failure to identify a subtle mesial temporal sclerosis or regions of cortical microdysgenesis is a likely explanation for some surgical failures. Extratemporal epilepsy syndromes masquerading as or coexistent with TLE result in incomplete resection of the epileptogenic zone and seizure relapse after surgery. In particular, the insula may be an important cause of surgical failure in patients with TLE.

Surgical techniques for the treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common form of medically intractable epilepsy. Advances in electrophysiology and neuroimaging have led to a more precise localization of the epileptogenic zone within the temporal lobe. Resective surgery is the most effective treatment for TLE. Despite the variability in surgical techniques and in the extent of resection, the overall outcomes of different TLE surgeries are similar. Here, we review different surgical interventions for the management of TLE.

Reoperation after selective amygdalohippocampectomy: an MRI analysis of the extent of temporomesial resection in ten cases

BACKGROUND

Selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAHE) yields 60-80% of patients with medically refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy seizure-free and seems to be equally effective compared to the more extended temporal lobe resections. The resection of the entire entorhinal cortex (EC) is of crucial importance to warrant complete seizure control for those patients. Thus, evidence of residual EC could be a predictor of a potentially successful reoperation in patients with recurrent seizures after SAHE. We performed an analysis of preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients who underwent a reoperation after an unsuccessful transsylvian SAHE to assess the presence of residual EC before reoperation and to determine whether certain anatomical variants may dispose patients to incomplete resection of EC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients who underwent reoperation after SAHE for the recurrence of medically refractory seizures were studied. MRI after SAHE was assessed for the presence of residual EC using T2-weighted and inversion recovery sequences perpendicularly to the main axis of the hippocampus. The results were compared with a control group of ten patients who became seizure-free after SAHE. In the nine patients of the study group, the sulcal anatomy of the basal temporal lobe was graphically outlined and analysed on MRI scans performed before SAHE to characterise the sulcal boundaries of the EC.

FINDINGS

Residual EC was found in nine of ten patients and was absent in the control group. After reoperation (median follow-up of 36.5 months), eight out of ten patients were completely seizure-free. In seven out of nine patients, a discontinuous course of the lateral sulcal boundaries of the EC was determined.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful analysis of MRI verified residual mesiotemporal structures in the majority of patients who became seizure-free after reoperation. Certain temporobasal sulcal patterns might dispose for a higher risk of incomplete resection of the EC. The study confirms that reoperation is an effective treatment modality for patients with recurrent seizures after transsylvian SAHE.

Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: How do we improve surgical outcome?

Surgery has become the standard of care for patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy, with anterior temporal lobe resection the most common operation performed for adults with hippocampal sclerosis. This procedure leads to significant improvement in the lives of the overwhelming majority of patients. Despite improved techniques in neuroimaging that have facilitated the identification of potential surgical candidates, the short-term and long-term success of epilepsy surgery has not changed substantially in recent decades. The basic surgical goal, removal of the amygdala, hippocampus, and parahippocampal gyrus, is based on the hypothesis that these structures represent a uniform and contiguous source of seizures in the mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) syndrome. Recent observations from the histopathology of resected tissue, preoperative neuroimaging, and the basic science laboratory suggest that the syndrome is not always a uniform entity. Despite clinical similarity, not all patients become seizure-free. Improving surgical outcomes requires a re-examination of why patients fail surgery. This review examines recent findings from the clinic and laboratory. Historically, we have considered MTLE a single disorder, but it may be time to view it as a group of closely related syndromes with variable type and extent of histopathology. That recognition may lead to identifying the appropriate subgroups that will require different diagnostic and surgical approaches to improve surgical outcomes.

Utility of Magnetoencephalography in the Evaluation of Recurrent Seizures after Epilepsy Surgery

PURPOSE

To study the role of magnetoencephalography (MEG) in the surgical evaluation of children with recurrent seizures after epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

We studied 17 children with recurrent seizures after epilepsy surgery using interictal and ictal scalp EEG, intracranial video EEG (IVEEG), MRI, and MEG. We analyzed the location and distribution of MEG spike sources (MEGSSs) and the relationship of MEGSSs to the margins of previous resections and surgical outcome.

RESULTS

Clustered MEGSSs occurred at the margins of previous resections within two contiguous gyri in 10 patients (group A), extended spatially from a margin by < or =3 cm in three patients (group B), and were remote from a resection margin by >3 cm in six patients (group C). Two patients had concomitant group A and C clusters. Thirteen patients underwent second surgeries. IVEEG was used in four patients. Six of seven patients with group A MEGSS clusters did not require IVEEG for second surgeries. Follow-up periods ranged from 0.6 to 4.3 years (mean: 2.6 years). Eleven children, including eight who became seizure-free, achieved Engel class I or II.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate the utility of MEG for evaluating patients with recurrent seizures after epilepsy surgery. Specific MEGSS cluster patterns delineate epileptogenic zones. Removing cluster regions adjacent to the margins of previous resections, in addition to removing recurrent lesions, achieves favorable surgical outcome. Cluster location and extent identify which patients require IVEEG, potentially eliminating IVEEG for some. Patients with remotely located clusters require IVEEG for accurate assessment and localization of the entire epileptogenic zone.

Magnetoencephalographic spike sources associated with auditory auras in paediatric localisation-related epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To characterise magnetoencephalographic spike sources in paediatric patients with auditory auras and recurrent localisation-related epilepsy.

METHODS

Six patients (four boys and two girls (ages 7-14 years) were retrospectively studied. All patients had auditory auras as part of their initial seizure manifestation, including four patients who underwent previous brain surgery. Scalp video electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography (MEG) were carried out in six patients, intraoperative electrocorticography in three patients and extraoperative intracranial video electroencephalography in one patient. MEG auditory-evoked fields (AEFs) were studied in four patients.

RESULTS

Three patients had elementary auditory auras, one had complex auditory aura and two had both complex and elementary auras. All six patients had clustered MEG spike sources with coexisting scattered spike sources. MEG clusters were localised in the superior temporal gyrus with surrounding scatters in four patients (two left and two right); two patients had scattered spikes in the superior temporal gyrus in addition to clustered MEG spike sources in the left inferior and middle frontal gyri or parieto-occipital region. AEFs were located within an MEG cluster in one patient and within 3 cm of a cluster in two patients. Surgical resection, including the regions of MEG clusters, was carried out in four patients. Three of four patients who had previous surgeries were seizure free at 2 years after excision of the MEG cluster region.

CONCLUSIONS

MEG spike sources clustered in the superior temporal gyrus in six patients with auditory auras. These spike sources were in close proximity or seemed to engulf the magnetic AEF. Areas with MEG spike sources contained the residual or recurrent epileptogenic zone after incomplete cortical excision for lesional epilepsy.

The clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of temporal lobe epilepsy with normal MRI

Background and Purpose

To identify the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) with normal MRI.

Methods

Twenty-six patients were diagnosed with TLE with normal MRI by stereotaxically implanted depth electrode EEG (SEEG) and quantitative MRI. We divided the patients into anterior or diffuse temporal groups by interictal EEG, into localized, hemispheric or non-lateralized onset groups by ictal scalp EEG, and into focal or regional onset groups by SEEG. The clinical and electrophysiological characteristics were compared with those of 25 TLE patients with unilateral hippocampal atrophy (HA) on MRI. Four patients of TLE with unilateral HA also underwent SEEG.

Results

Patients in the normal MRI group showed a significantly higher frequency of secondarily generalization (225±235, median 160 vs 68±48, median 50, p<0.05), shorter duration of epilepsy (16±10 yrs vs 25.9±7.8 yrs, p<0.001), and less favorable surgical outcome (50% vs 88%, p <0.05) than patients in the unilateral HA group. Also, patients with normal MRI frequently showed diffuse temporal (50% vs 20%, p<0.05) discharges on interictal EEG. The ictal seizure patterns of patients with normal MRI showed less localization to one temporal lobe on scalp EEG (28% vs 65%, p<0.001) and a higher frequency of regional onset on SEEG (68% vs 8%, p<0.001) than patients with unilateral HA.

Conclusions

The characteristics of TLE with normal MRI compared with TLE with unilateral HA are shorter duration of epilepsy, higher frequency of secondarily generalization, and less favorable surgical outcome, suggesting wider areas of temporal lobe involved compared with patients with unilateral HA.

Temporal lobe epilepsy: analysis of failures and the role of reoperation

PURPOSE

To analyze failures and reoperations in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), and compare these patients with those seizure-free, and to determine any significant differences between the groups.

METHODS

A total of 262 patients with TLE, treated surgically between 1984 and 2002, were followed at 3, 6 and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Sixty-five percent became seizure-free (class I), 19% had rare seizures (class II), and 16% continued to have seizures (classes III and IV). Patients in classes III and IV underwent re-evaluation, and were compared with seizure-free patients.

RESULTS

Analysis of failures (n = 41): 12% had febrile seizures (FS), 29% head trauma, 7% encephalitis, 52% abnormal imaging, 34% bitemporal spiking, and 20% posterior temporal localization. Post-surgical MRI (available in 30 of 41 patients) showed residual posterior mesial temporal structures (PMTS) in 86.6%, PMTS and posterior temporal lesions (PTLs) in 6.6%, and PTLs in another 6.6%. Twenty-one had reoperation, 14 had resection of the PMTS, five of the PMTS and basal posterior temporal cortex, and two of the PMTS, and PTLs. There was no surgical mortality or morbidity; 57% became seizure-free and 24% had rare seizures. Seizure-free patients (n = 170): 45% had FS, 12% head trauma and 70% abnormal imaging studies.

CONCLUSION

When compared with seizure-free patients, patients who failed TLE surgery were less likely to have a history of FS and abnormal imaging, and more likely to have a history of head trauma, encephalitis and posterior temporal localization, suggesting larger epileptogenic zones. Following reoperation, 57% became seizure-free. Predictors of a good outcome after reoperation were anterior temporal localization and abnormal imaging studies.

Resective reoperation for failed epilepsy surgery: Seizure outcome in 64 patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the surgical outcome and factors of predictive value in patients undergoing reoperation for intractable partial epilepsy.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively studied the operative outcome in 64 consecutive patients who underwent reoperation for intractable partial epilepsy. Demographic data, results of comprehensive preoperative evaluations, and the seizure and neurologic outcome after reoperation were determined. All patients were followed a minimum of 1 year subsequent to their last operative procedure.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients had two surgeries, and 11 patients had three or more operations. The first surgery involved a lesionectomy (n = 33), "nonlesional" temporal lobe resection (n = 28), and a "nonlesional" extratemporal resection (n = 3). The mean duration between the first and second procedure was 5.5 years. Fifty-five patients underwent an intralobar reoperation, whereas nine had a resection of a different lobe. After reoperation, 25 patients (39%) were free of seizure, 6 patients (9%) had rare seizures, 12 patients (19%) had a worthwhile improvement, and 21 patients (33%) failed to respond to surgery. Predictors of seizure-free outcome were age at seizure onset >15 years (p = 0.01), duration of epilepsy < or =5 years at the time of initial surgery (p = 0.03), and focal interictal discharges in scalp EEG (p = 0.03). Using a logistic regression model, two significant predictors emerged: duration of epilepsy < or =5 years (odds ratio, 3.18; p = 0.04) and preoperative focal interictal discharge (odds ratio, 4.45; p = 0.02). Complications of reoperation included visual field deficits (n = 9), wound infection (n = 2), subdural hematoma (n = 1), and hemiparesis (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Reoperation may be an appropriate alternative form of treatment for selected patients with intractable partial epilepsy who fail to respond to initial surgery.

Potentially misleading extratemporal lobe lesions in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy

From a series of 217 consecutive temporal resections for intractable epilepsy between 1993 and 2000, we identified all patients with large non-neoplastic extratemporal lesions. Only patients with known postsurgical outcomes with follow up for more than two years were included. Fifteen patients were identified. All patients had a history of medically refractory epilepsy with clinical and ictal evidence of mesial temporal seizure onset. Eleven patients had extratemporal lesions ipsilateral to the seizure focus, whereas four patients had the lesions contralateral to the seizure focus. Nine of the 15 patients had evidence of hippocampal atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Following temporal resection, nine of these patients (60%) became seizure free (Engel class 1A), two patients were free of disabling seizures only (Engel class 1B), and two patients had a few early seizures but then became seizure free for at least two years (Engel class 1C). Two patients had significant improvement (Engel class 2). Thus, the finding of large extratemporal lesions on MRI was potentially misleading. When clinical semiology and ictal EEG recordings provide evidence of temporal onset seizures, anterior temporal resection should be considered in patients with extratemporal lesions.

Temporal lobe epilepsy: when are invasive recordings needed?

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common type of medically intractable partial epilepsy amenable to surgery. In the majority of cases, the underlying pathology in temporal lobe epilepsy is mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS). Whereas historically invasive recordings were required for most epilepsy surgeries, indications have dramatically changed since the introduction of high-resolution MRI, which uncovers structural lesions in a high percentage of cases. No invasive recordings are required to perform a temporal lobectomy in patients with intractable epilepsy who have structural imaging suggesting unilateral MTS and concordant interictal and ictal surface EEG recordings, functional imaging, and clinical findings. Invasive testing is needed if there is evidence of bitemporal MTS on structural imaging and/or electrophysiologically, and additional information from functional imaging, neuropsychology, and the intracarotid amobarbital (Wada) test also does not help to lateralize the epileptogenic zone. Depth electrodes can be particularly helpful in this setting. However, no surgery is indicated, even without invasive recordings, if bitemporal-independent seizures are recorded by surface EEG and all additional testing is inconclusive. Other etiologies of TLE such as a tumor, vascular malformation, encephalomalacia, or congenital developmental abnormality account for about 30% of all patients who undergo epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy surgery is indicated after limited electrophysiologic investigations if neuroimaging and electrophysiology converge. However, approaches for resection in lesional temporal lobe epilepsy vary among centers. Completeness of resection is crucial and invasive recordings may be needed to guide the resection by mapping eloquent cortex and/or to determine the extent of the non-MRI-visible epileptogenic area. Specific approaches for the different pathologies are discussed because there is evidence that the relationship between the lesions visible on MRI and the epileptogenic zone varies among lesions of different pathologies, and therefore variable surgical strategies must be applied.

Natural history of recurrent seizures after resective surgery for epilepsy

Seizures persist or recur in 20-60% of patients after resective surgery for intractable partial epilepsy. Further information about the natural course of these seizures is lacking in the literature. During one decade of epilepsy surgery at a single institution, we identified 72 patients with recurrent postoperative seizures after resective procedures for epilepsy. Prospectively compiled seizure diaries, hospital records, and outpatient office records were reviewed and supplemented by telephone communications to assess subsequent seizure frequency. Follow-up data was available ranging from 6 months to 7 years 5 months (mean 3 years 5 months). The likelihood of persistent seizures and recurrent intractability was examined with life-tables. Seizures recurred within the first postoperative year in 86% of patients and were similar to preoperative events in 74% of patients. After the first seizure recurrence, there was 80% likelihood of persistent seizures in the next 6 years and 40% likelihood of intractability (more than one seizure a month despite optimal medical therapy). The interval until recurrence within the first postoperative year did not affect the likelihood of subsequent seizures or intractability. Late seizure recurrence (after the first year) was not associated with any instances of subsequent intractability. Recurrent seizures after extratemporal resections were more likely to become persistent and intractable than seizures recurring after temporal resections. This information provides rational prognostication and assists in counseling patients with recurrent seizures after resective surgery for intractable epilepsy.