Visual evoked potentials during posteroventral pallidotomy for Parkinson's disease

Cortical visual evoked potentials recorded after optic tract near field stimulation during GPi-DBS in non-cooperative patients

OBJECT

Neurophysiologic monitoring during deep brain stimulation (DBS) interventions in the globus pallidus internum (Gpi) for the treatment of Parkinson's disease or primary dystonia is generally based upon microelectrode recordings (MER); moreover, MER request sophisticated technology and high level trained personnel for a reliable monitoring. Recordings of cortical visual evoked potentials (CVEPs) obtained after stimulation of the optic tract may be a potential option to MER; since optic tract lies just beneath the best target for Gpi DBS, changes in CVEPs during intraoperative exploration may drive a correct electrode positioning.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cortical VEPs from optic tract stimulation (OT C-CEPs) have been recorded in seven patients during GPi-DBS for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and primary dystonia under general sedation. OT C-VEPs were obtained after near-field monopolar stimulation of the optic tract; recording electrodes were at the scalp. Cortical responses after optic tract versus standard visual stimulation were compared.

RESULTS

After intraoperative near-field OT stimulation a biphasic wave, named N40-P70, was detected in all cases. N40-P70 neither change in morphology nor in latency at different depths, but increased in amplitude approaching the optic tract. The electrode tip was positioned just 1mm above the point where OT-CVEPs showed the larger amplitude. No MERs were obtained in these patients; OT CVEPs were the only method to detect the Gpi before positioning the electrodes.

CONCLUSIONS

OT CVEPs seem to be as reliable as MER to detail the optimal target in Gpi surgery: in addition they are less expensive, faster to perform and easier to decode.

A metaanalysis comparing the results of pallidotomy performed using microelectrode recording or macroelectrode stimulation

OBJECT

There is an active debate regarding whether pallidotomy should be performed using macroelectrode stimulation or the more sophisticated and expensive method of microelectrode recording. No prospective, randomized trial results have answered this question, although personnel at many centers claim one method is superior. In their metaanalysis the authors reviewed published reports of both methods to determine if there is a significant difference in clinical outcomes or complication rates associated with these methods.

METHODS

A metaanalysis was performed with data from reports on the use of unilateral pallidotomy in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) that were published between 1992 and 2000. A Medline search was conducted for the key word "pallidotomy" and additional studies were added following a review of the references. Only those studies dealing with unilateral procedures performed in patients with PD were included. Papers were excluded if they described a cohort smaller than 10 patients or a follow-up period shorter than 3 months or included cases that previously had been reported. The primary end points for outcome were the percentages of improvement in dyskinesias and in motor scores determined by the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS). Complications were categorized as mortality, intracranial hemorrhage, visual deficit, speech deficit, cognitive decline, weakness, and other. There were no significant differences between the two methods with respect to improvements in dyskinesias (p = 0.66) or UPDRS motor scores (p = 0.62). Microelectrode recording was associated with a significantly higher (p = 0.012) intracranial hemorrhage rate (1.3 +/- 0.4%), compared with macroelectrode stimulation (0.25 +/- 0.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

In reports of patients with PD who underwent unilateral pallidotomy, operations that included microelectrode recording were associated with a small, but significantly higher rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage; however, there was no difference in postoperative reduction of dyskinesia or bradykinesia compared with operations that included macroelectrode stimulation.

Pallidotomy for parkinson disease: a review of contemporary literature

OBJECT

The authors conducted an evidence-based review of contemporary published articles on pallidotomy to obtain an appraisal of this procedure in the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD).

METHODS

A search of the Pubmed database performed using the key word "pallidotomy" yielded 263 articles cited between January 1, 1992, and July 1, 1999. Articles that included original, nonduplicated descriptions of patients with PD treated with radiofrequency pallidotomy were selected. In 85 articles identified for critical review, 1959 patients with PD underwent pallidotomies at 40 centers in 12 countries. There were 1735 unilateral (88.6%) and 224 bilateral procedures (11.4%). The mean age of the patients was 61.4+/-3.6 years and the mean duration of PD symptoms in these patients was 12.3+/-1.9 years. Microelectrode recordings were used in 46.2% of cases. Outcomes were objectively documented using the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in 501 (25.6%) of the cases at 6 months and in 218 (11.1%) of the cases at 1 year. There was a consensus on the benefits of pallidotomy for off period motor function and on period, drug-induced dyskinesias, with variations in the extent of symptomatic benefit across studies. At the 1-year assessment, the mean improvement in the UPDRS motor score during off periods was 45.3% and the mean improvement in contralateral dyskinesias during on periods was 86.4%. The overall mortality rate was 0.4% and the rate of persistent adverse effects was estimated at 14%. Major adverse events, including intracerebral hemorrhages, contralateral weakness, and visual field defects, occurred in 5.3% of patients reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral pallidotomy is effective and relatively safe in the treatment of PD; however, limited data are available on the long-term outcome of this procedure.

Prefrontal dysfunction following unilateral posteroventral pallidotomy in Parkinson's disease

OBJECT

Pre- and postoperative cognitive function was evaluated in 25 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who underwent unilateral posteroventral pallidotomy (PVP) to clarify the effects of this operation on cognitive function.

METHODS

Cognitive function was assessed before surgery and 1 month and 3 months afterward by using a battery of neuropsychological tests consisting of orientation, digit span (forward and backward), digit learning, 5-minute memory of five words, similarities, serial sevens, animal name listing, and the kana pick-out test, as well as the Japanese version of the Mini-Mental State. Preoperative evaluation revealed that patients experienced difficulties in performing the neuropsychological tasks of reasoning and abstraction, working memory of numerals, word fluency, and concept formation compared with 36 healthy volunteers (p < 0.05). A simple regression analysis showed strong relationships in a negative fashion between preoperative (r = 0.81, p = 0.002) and 1-month (r = 0.79, p = 0.0059) and 3-month (r = 0.85, p = 0.0016) postoperative gross-total scores and Hoehn and Yahr staging. Preoperative and postoperative scores at 1 month and 3 months were analyzed by analysis of variance, but only the Fisher's post hoc test revealed the source of difference. All tasks except orientation (p = 0.0292) were unchanged in the 10 patients who underwent surgery on the right side. The scores for this task at 1 month postsurgery were significantly lower (p = 0.0203) but improved to preoperative values by 3 months. In the 15 patients who underwent surgery on the left side significant differences among tasks were revealed for serial sevens (p = 0.0471) and animal naming (p = 0.0425). The scores for these tasks were significantly lower at 1 month postoperatively (p = 0.0431 for serial sevens and p = 0.0408 for animal naming), but improved by 3 months after the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data revealed that cognitive dysfunction in patients with PD relates to advancement of Hoehn and Yahr stage, but PVP is not associated with significant long-lasting cognitive deficits.