Gamma probe sentinel node localization and biopsy in breast cancer patients treated with a neoadjuvant chemotherapy scheme

Outcomes of Sentinel Node Biopsy for Women with Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Data

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for patients with breast cancer is inconclusive. This study reviewed the real-world data to determine the acceptability of SLNB after NAT.

METHODS

The study searched for articles in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The primary outcomes were the identification rate for sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and the false-negative rate (FNR) for SLNB. The study also evaluated the FNR in subgroups defined by tumor stage, nodal stage, hormone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 status, tumor response, mapping technique, and number of SLNs removed.

RESULTS

The study retrieved 61 prospective and 18 retrospective studies with 10,680 initially cN± patients. The pooled estimate of the identification rate was 0.906 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.891-0.922), and the pooled FNR was 0.118 (95 % CI, 0.103-0.133). In subgroup analysis, the FNR was significantly higher for the patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative status and fewer than three SLNs removed. The FNR did not differ significantly between the patients with and those without complete tumor response. Among the patients with initial clinical negative axillary lymph nodes, the incidence of node metastasis was 26.8 % (275/1041) after NAT.

CONCLUSION

Real-world evidence indicates that the FNR of SLNB after NAT in breast cancer is 11.8 %, exceeding only slightly the commonly adopted threshold of 10 %. The FNR is significantly higher for patients with ER-negative status and removal of fewer than three SLNs. Using a dual tracer and removing at least three SLNs may increase the accuracy of SLNB after NAT.

Role of gamma probe-assisted intraoperative sentinel lymph node evaluation in predicting axillary breast cancer metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Intraoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy is a universally accepted technique to identify patients who are candidates for axillary lymph node dissection during breast cancer surgery. However, there is controversy over its use in patients who underwent preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study aimed to examine the diagnostic value of gamma probe-assisted intraoperative sentinel lymph node examination with frozen section in breast cancer patients who had undergone preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 94 tumors diagnosed with stage IIA, IIB or IIIA invasive breast cancer with locoregional lymph node metastasis who underwent surgical treatment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Intraoperatively, axillary sentinel lymph node sampling was done using radioactive colloid and gamma probe and materials were examined with frozen section method. Patients with positive sentinel nodes underwent axillary resection. Histopathological examination of all surgical samples was done postoperatively.

RESULTS

In 87 of 94 tumors (92.6%), a sentinel lymph node could be identified using the method. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the method for predicting axillary macro metastasis were 85.7, 86.5 and 86.2%, respectively, with 5.7% false negative rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Sentinel lymph node identification using preoperative scintigraphy and intraoperative use of gamma probe seems to be a feasible and efficient method in terms of differentiating patients that require axillary lymph node dissection during breast cancer surgery, even when they have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further large prospective studies allowing subgroup analyses are warranted.

The predictive value of sentinel node biopsy in early breast cancer after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy: A prospective study

OBJECTIVE

A sentinel Node (SN) has replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with clinically node negative axilla (cN0). SN after Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is feasible but not accurate in clinically node positive (cN1-3) patients. The goal of this study is to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of SN in cN0 breast cancer after NACT. A secondary endpoint is to determine if ALND can be avoided after NACT regardless of the pre-treatment clinical staging of the axilla, in case of a normalization of the ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography scan (PET-CT scan).

DESIGN

A single institution prospective study regarding the negative predictive value of the SN in breast cancer after NACT was conducted in the Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic of the Antwerp University Hospital from 29/03/2010 until 01/12/2015 (Study number: B30020108368). Inclusion criteria for study participation were: breast cancer, age above 18 years, female, tumor stages T2-T4 N0-3 or T1N1-N3. All patients were staged by a mammography, ultrasound of the axilla, MRI of the breast, PET-CT scan and bone scintigraphy. They received NACT consisting of 12 cycles of paclitaxel or 4 cycles of docetaxel followed by dose dense doxorubicin or epirubicin/cyclofosfamide or vice versa as a standard initial treatment. After 6 weeks, a PET-CT scan was performed for early tumour response evaluation. At the day of operation, a ⁹⁹mTC-labelled nanocolloid was used to identify the SN. During the surgery the SN were removed separately together with a complete ALND.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients were enrolled in our study of which 129 were eligible for analysis. 53 patients had a positive SN of which 32 have a positive axillary lymph nodes (ALN), positive predictive value (PPV) was 60%; 76 patients had a negative SN of which 6 had a positive ALN (NPV 92%). The sensitivity is 84% and the specificity 76% with a false omission rate (FOR) of 8%. In total 45 patients ALN were clinical negative and no suspect lymph nodes were seen on ultrasound, MRI and PET-CT scan) and 45 patients had negative a SN, with no ALN and 2 patients had a positive SN of which 1 patients had axillary involvement (NPV 100%). The FOR of cN1: 5%, cN2: 37%, cN3 33%. A total of 22 patients out of 84 patients (26%) of which 15/49 cN1 (30%), 6/23 (26%) cN2, 1/12 (8%) have after 6 weeks of chemotherapy and normalization on PET-CT scan. A total of 17 patients had a negative SN and ALN. The FOR was in this group was 0%.

CONCLUSION

A SNB should become the standard after NACT if case of a cN0. If after NACT the PET CT has normalized, no ALND should be performed if the SN is negative.

Total pathological complete response versus breast pathological complete response in clinical trials of reference and biosimilar trastuzumab in the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Trastuzumab is a key drug in the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancers that overexpress the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Pathological complete response (pCR) is commonly used as an endpoint in neoadjuvant clinical trials of trastuzumab as evidence suggests it may be a surrogate for long-term survival. Several biosimilar candidates of originator or 'reference' trastuzumab are in development and have used pCR as a primary endpoint to assess therapeutic equivalence between treatments. The exact definition of pCR has varied across studies. Areas covered: Here we look at the clinical relevance of pCR and compare rates of total pCR (defined as ypT0/is ypN0) and breast pCR (defined as ypT0/is) in clinical trials of reference and biosimilar trastuzumab. Expert commentary: In order to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant systemic therapies in a uniform way, standardization of trial endpoints is necessary. Future studies in HER2-positive breast cancer should include full assessment of the breast and lymph node basin before and after neoadjuvant systemic therapy, and the use of total pCR as the primary outcome.

Selective Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Primary Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer

Aims and background

Sentinel lymph node biopsy has become an ordinary method for breast cancer staging. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been considered one of the contraindications for sentinel lymph node biopsy due to potential secondary fibrosis and lymphatic distortion. Timing and influence on sentinel lymph node biopsy result by primary systemic therapy are current and controversial topics.

Methods and study design

The experience in the medical literature is reviewed. A search was performed in the following databases: Medline (through Pubmed), EMBASE, Tripdatabase and Cochrane Library, between January 1998 and December 2008.

Results and conclusions

After analyzing the conclusions from 42 series and waiting for the end of related prospective trials, it could be concluded that sentinel lymph node biopsy is a useful diagnostic tool that should be integrated in the algorithm for the management of breast cancer patients when primary systemic therapy is needed.

The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ or with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Background

A significant number of patients who are initially diagnosed with pure DCIS will harbor missed or occult invasive disease at their definitive surgery. To provide more accurate staging information and to avoid a second operation, some investigators believe that SLN mapping should be performed in DCIS patients. The role of SLN biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer is controversial.

Methods

A review of the literature was performed to determine the role of SLN biopsy in patients with DCIS or advanced breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The success rate of SLN biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was investigated as well as the percentage of positive SLNs in patients with DCIS.

Results

Two consecutive studies revealed metastatic disease to the regional lymph nodes in up to 13% of DCIS patients. In addition, 10% of DCIS patients were upstaged to infiltrating ductal carcinoma at their definitive therapy. The ability of the SLN to predict the status of the remaining non-SLNs after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is unknown. False-negative rates range from 0% to 33%. The success rate for SLN identification for the combined series varies from 84% to 97%.

Conclusions

SLN biopsy is a minimally invasive technique that can be used to evaluate the regional nodal status of DCIS patients. Performing a SLN biopsy during the initial surgical procedure may avoid a second operation in some DCIS patients who are diagnosed with invasive disease at their definitive operation. The success rate of sentinel node identification does not seem to be altered after neoadjuvant therapy. However, the ability of the SLN to predict the pathologic status of the adjacent non-SLNs remains unknown. Therefore, until further prospective randomized trials are conducted, it cannot be assumed that all the regional nodes have the same biologic response to chemotherapy as the SLN.

Factors affecting sentinel lymph node identification rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients enrolled in ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate factors affecting sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with initial node-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND

SLN surgery is increasingly used for nodal staging after NAC and optimal technique for SLN identification is important.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1071 prospective trial enrolled clinical T0-4, N1-2, M0 breast cancer patients. After NAC, SLN surgery and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were planned. Multivariate logistic regression modeling assessing factors influencing SLN identification was performed.

RESULTS

Of 756 patients enrolled, 34 women withdrew, 21 were ineligible, 12 underwent ALND only, and 689 had SLN surgery attempted. At least 1 SLN was identified in 639 patients (92.7%: 95% CI: 90.5%-94.6%). Among factors evaluated, mapping technique was the only factor found to impact SLN identification; with use of blue dye alone increasing the likelihood of failure to identify the SLN relative to using radiolabeled colloid +/- blue dye (P = 0.006; OR = 3.82; 95% CI: 1.47-9.92). The SLN identification rate was 78.6% with blue dye alone; 91.4% with radiolabeled colloid and 93.8% with dual mapping agents. Patient factors (age, body mass index), tumor factors (clinical T or N stage), pathologic nodal response to chemotherapy, site of tracer injection, and length of chemotherapy treatment did not significantly affect the SLN identification rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The SLN identification rate after NAC was higher when mapping was performed using radiolabeled colloid alone or with blue dye compared with blue dye alone. Optimal tracer use is important to ensure successful identification of SLN(s) after NAC.

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on locoregional surgical treatment of breast cancer

Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy (NC) has become the standard of care for patients with locally advanced breast cancer and is being increasingly used in those with large operable disease. Its main clinical advantages from a surgical therapy standpoint include the potential for conversion of patients requiring mastectomy to breast-conservation candidates, the potential for improving the cosmetic outcome following lumpectomy by decreasing the size of the primary breast tumor even if the patient is a lumpectomy candidate at presentation, and the potential for converting patients who present with positive axillary nodes and who would initially require axillary lymph node dissection to candidates for sentinel lymph node biopsy alone. Important steps are required from the time of diagnosis until the time of surgical resection to ensure successful locoregional therapy outcomes in patients treated with NC. They include accurate assessment of the location and extent of the primary breast tumor and determination of axillary nodal status before and after NC. This information is critical for successful execution of the surgical plan and to optimize the use of adjuvant radiotherapy following NC. In the future, development of more active neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and novel molecular and imaging techniques will undoubtedly lead to further individualization of breast cancer surgical management following NC, including the possibility of avoiding surgical resection in cases with a high likelihood of achieving a pathological complete response.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy does not apply to all axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients with confirmed axillary nodal metastases.

METHODS

We enrolled 51 patients with breast cancer who received NAC. All patients were proven to have axillary nodal metastases by histopathology biopsy prior to NAC. They all underwent SLNB before breast surgery, and complete axillary lymph node dissection immediately followed.

RESULTS

The identification rate for SLNB was 87.5% (84/96); the false negative rate was 24.5% (12/49). The clinicopathological factors were not significantly correlated with the identification and false negative rate of the SLNB. Lymphatic mapping, blue dye or radionuclide methods tended to decrease the identification rate of SLNB (P = 0.073). Clinical nodal status before NAC has a trend to increase the false-negative rates of the SLNB (P = 0.059). For patients with N1 clinical axillary lymph nodal status, the identification rate was 93.9%, and the false negative rate was 5.9%, compared with N2-3 patients with 73.9% and 38.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB is feasible for the patients whose axillary lymph nodal status before NAC is N1. However, for N2-3 patients, SLNB cannot be used as an infallible indicator of non-SLN status.

Management of the axilla

The development and wide acceptance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has profoundly affected the management of breast cancer. SLNB has spared the additional morbidity of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) without compromising diagnostic accuracy and prognostic information in patients with clinically node-negative early-stage breast cancer. It has become an invaluable tool to clinicians to guide decisions regarding adjuvant treatment. The management of breast cancer continues to advance to more minimally invasive approaches, and the role of ALND is likely to become less important in the future.

Reliability of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

Purpose

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an accurate and effective means of axillary nodal staging in early breast cancer. However its indication after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is under constant debate. The present study evaluates the reliability of SLNB in assessing axillary nodal status after NAC.

Methods

Data from 281 patients who had received NAC and subsequent SLNB were reviewed. The identification and false negative rates of SLNB were determined and the clinicopathologic factors associated with false negative results were investigated using univariate analysis.

Results

The identification rate of SLNB after NAC was 93.6% and the false negative rate was 10.4%. Hormone receptor status, especially progesterone receptor positivity, was significantly associated with false negative results. The accuracy of intraoperative frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes was 91.2%.

Conclusion

The identification rate of SLNB and the accuracy of intraoperative frozen section examination after NAC are comparable to the results without NAC in patients with early breast cancer. However considering the high false negative rates, general application of SLNB after NAC should be avoided. Patients with progesterone-positive tumors and non-triple-negative breast cancers may be a select group of patients in whom SLNB can be employed safely after NAC, but further studies are necessary.

Timing of the sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy - recommendations for clinical guidance

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an increasingly important component in the treatment of both locally advanced and early-stage breast cancer. With this, a debate on the timing of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has emerged. At the end of the last century, the SLNB was introduced as an axillary staging modality, and this paper aims to further elucidate this issue in the context of NAC. We compiled available data on the SLNB after NAC and provide clinical guidance for timing the SLNB in this context. On the basis of our findings, we recommend that the SLNB can be performed after NAC in all cases. In patients with a clinically node-negative (cN0) status prior to NAC, the SLNB should be performed after NAC, and in case of a histologically confirmed negative SLNB, a completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has no added value and can be omitted. In patients with clinically positive nodal involvement (cN+) prior to NAC, all axillary surgery can also be performed after NAC.

Feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients with initial axillary lymph node metastasis after primary systemic therapy

Purpose

Primary systemic therapy (PST) downstages up to 40% of initial documented axillary lymph node (ALN) metastases in breast cancer. The current surgical treatment after PST consists of breast tumor resection and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). This strategy, however, does not eliminate unnecessary ALND in patients with complete remission of axillary metastases. The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after PST among patients with documented ALN metastasis at presentation and to identify the rate of pathologic complete-remission (CR) with ALN after PST.

Methods

We analyzed 66 patients with ALN metastasis that was pathologically proven preoperatively who underwent SLNB and concomitant ALND after PST. Axillary ultrasound (AUS) was used to evaluate the clinical response of initially documented ALN metastasis after PST. Intraoperative lymphatic mapping was performed using blue dye with or without radioisotope.

Results

After PST, 34.8% of patients had clinical CR of ALN on AUS and 28.8% patients had pathologic CR of ALN. The overall success rate of SLNB after PST was 87.9%, and the sentinel lymph node identification rate in patients with clinical CR was 95.7%. In patients with successful lymphatic mapping, 70.7% of patients had residual axillary metastases. The overall accuracy and false-negative rate were 87.9% and 17.1% in all patients: 95.5% and 10.0% in patients with clinical CR of ALN, and 83.3% and 19.4% in patients with residual axillary disease after PST.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that SLNB may be feasible in patients with initial documented ALN metastasis who have clinical CR for metastatic ALN after PST. Further investigation in a prospective setting should be performed to confirm our results.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy using dye alone method is reliable and accurate even after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer--a prospective study

Background

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is now considered a standard of care in early breast cancers with N0 axillae; however, its role in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is still being debated. The present study assessed the feasibility, efficacy and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using "dye alone" (methylene blue) method in patients with LABC following NACT.

Materials and methods

Thirty, biopsy proven cases of LABC that had received three cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, 5-fluorouracil) were subjected to SLNB (using methylene blue dye) followed by complete axillary lymph node dissection (levels I-III). The sentinel node(s) was/were and the axilla were individually assessed histologically. The SLN accuracy parameters were calculated employing standard definitions. The SLN identification rate in the present study was 100%. The sensitivity of SLNB was 86.6% while the accuracy was 93.3%, which were comparable with other studies done using dual lymphatic mapping method. The SLN was found at level I in all cases and no untoward reaction to methylene blue dye was observed.

Conclusions

This study confirms that SLNB using methylene blue dye as a sole mapping agent is reasonably safe and almost as accurate as dual agent mapping method. It is likely that in the near future, SLNB may become the standard of care and provide a less morbid alternative to routine axillary lymph node dissection even in patients with LABC that have received NACT.

Histologic changes associated with false-negative sentinel lymph nodes after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with confirmed lymph node-positive breast cancer before treatment

BACKGROUND

A wide range of false-negative rates has been reported for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether histologic findings in negative SLNs after preoperative chemotherapy are helpful in assessing the accuracy of SLN biopsy in patients with confirmed lymph node-positive disease before treatment.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with confirmed lymph node-positive disease at presentation underwent successful SLN biopsy and axillary dissection after preoperative chemotherapy at a single institution between 1994 and 2007. Available hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections from patients with negative SLNs were reviewed, and associations between histologic findings in the negative SLNs and SLN status (true negative vs false negative) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-seven (55%) patients had at least 1 positive SLN, and 39 (45%) patients had negative SLNs. The false-negative rate was 22%, and the negative predictive value was 67%. The negative SLNs from 17 of 34 patients with available slides had focal areas of fibrosis, some with associated foamy parenchymal histiocytes, fat necrosis, or calcification. These histologic findings occurred in 15 (65%) of 23 patients with true-negative SLNs and in only 2 (18%) of 11 patients with false-negative SLNs (P = .03, Fisher exact test, 2-tailed). The lack of these histologic changes had a sensitivity and specificity for identifying a false-negative SLN of 82% and 65%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Absence of treatment effect in SLNs after chemotherapy in patients with lymph node-positive disease at initial presentation has good sensitivity but low specificity for identifying a false-negative SLN.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy before or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: pros and cons

This article summarizes the relative pros and cons surrounding the timing of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Several institutions initiated prospective trials of SLN biopsy performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in conjunction with a completion axillary lymph node dissection, with the goal of ultimately showing that SLN biopsy could be safely and accurately performed after the patient completed systemic therapy. Other institutions adopted a policy of performing SLN biopsy before initiation of chemotherapy. This avoided the issue surrounding the accuracy of SLN biopsy after chemotherapy and potentially provided information that might influence adjuvant therapy decisions. This article addresses the clinical questions regarding the 2 approaches including the accuracy of the procedure and the prognostic information gleaned.

Axillary sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) with potentially sterilized axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2002 and 2008, SLNB with both blue-dye and radioisotope injection was performed in 77 patients with LABC whose cytopathologically confirmed positive axillary node(s) became clinically negative after NAC. Factors associated with SLN identification and false-negative rates, presence of non-sentinel lymph node (non-SLN) metastasis were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

SLNB was successful in 92% of the patients. Axillary status was predicted with 90% accuracy and a false-negative rate of 13.7%. Patients with residual tumor size >2 cm had a decreased SLN identification rate (p=0.002). Axillary nodal status before NAC (N2 versus N1) was associated with higher false-negative rates (p=0.04). Positive non-SLN(s) were more frequent in patients with multifocal/multicentric tumors (versus unifocal; p=0.003) and positive lymphovascular invasion (versus negative; p=0.0001). SLN(s) positive patients with pathologic tumor size >2 cm (versus <or=2 cm; p=0.004), positive extra-sentinel lymph node extension (versus negative; p=0.002) were more likely to have metastatic non-SLN(s).

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB has a high identification rate and modest false-negative rate in LABC patients who became clinically axillary node negative after NAC. Residual tumor size and nodal status before NAC affect SLNB accuracy. Additional involvement of non-SLN(s) increases with the presence of multifocal/multicentric tumors, lymphovascular invasion, residual tumor size >2 cm, and extra-sentinel node extension.

Cost modeling of preoperative axillary ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration to guide surgery for invasive breast cancer

PURPOSE

Preoperative axillary lymph node ultrasound (US) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy can identify a proportion of node-positive patients and avoid sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery and direct surgical treatment. We compared the costs with preoperative US/FNA to without US/FNA (standard of care) for invasive breast cancer.

METHODS

Using decision-analytic software we constructed a model to assess the costs associated with the two preoperative strategies. Diagnostic test sensitivities and specificities were obtained from literature review. Costs were derived from Medicare payment rates and actual resource utilization. Base-case results were fully probabilistic to capture parameter uncertainty in economic results.

RESULTS

Base-case results estimate total mean costs per patient of $10,947 ("$" indicates US dollars throughout) with the US/FNA strategy and $10,983 with standard of care, an incremental cost savings of $36, on average, per patient [95% confidence interval (CI) of cost difference: -$248 to $179]. Most (63%) of the simulations resulted in cost saving with axillary US/FNA. One-way sensitivity analyses suggest that results are sensitive to assumed diagnostic and surgical costs and selected diagnostic test parameters. US/FNA approach was similar in costs or cost saving relative to the standard of care for all tumor stages.

CONCLUSIONS

The additional cost of performing axillary US with possible FNA in every patient is balanced, on average, by the savings from avoiding SLN in cases where metastasis can be documented preoperatively. Routine use of preoperative axillary US with FNA to guide surgical planning can decrease the overall cost of patient care for invasive breast cancer.

Recent advances in the surgical care of breast cancer patients

A tremendous improvement in every aspect of breast cancer management has occurred in the last two decades. Surgeons, once solely interested in the extipartion of the primary tumor, are now faced with the need to incorporate a great deal of information, and to manage increasingly complex tasks.

As a comprehensive assessment of all aspects of breast cancer care is beyond the scope of the present paper, the current review will point out some of these innovations, evidence some controversies, and stress the need for the surgeon to specialize in the various aspects of treatment and to be integrated into the multisciplinary breast unit team.

Is sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy feasible in Chinese patients with invasive breast cancers?

BACKGROUND

A wide variation in the accuracy of performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer has been reported despite its increased use. This study aimed to be the first to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Chinese patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

A review of prospectively collected data from breast cancer patients who had SLNB after prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy was performed. A combination of radiopharmaceutical 99mTc-albumin colloid (Pharmalucence, MA, USA) and Patent Blue V dye (Guerbet, France) was used to identify the SLN. SLNB was followed by standard axillary dissection in all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 365 patients received SLNB from May 1999 to April 2006. A total of 78 patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by SLNB were recruited. The SLN identification rate, false-negative rate and accuracy rate were 83.3, 10.3 and 73.1%, respectively. Analysis was stratified into clinical and pathological response group. Location of the tumour was also found to be an important factor in affecting the false-negative rate (P= 0.019). For upper, outer quadrant tumour, five (32.3%, out of 16) patients presented with false-negative. Patients with more sentinel lymph node harvest had higher accuracy. A total of 22 patients had three or more lymph nodes harvested, and the false-negative rate was 21.7% (5 out of 23 patients) (P= 0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study show that SLNB is feasible and applicable in Chinese patients with breast cancer with operable disease who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Accuracy of sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

As neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly used to downstage patients with breast cancer, the timing of the sentinel node (SN) biopsy has become an important issue. This review was conducted to determine the accuracy of SN biopsy following NAC.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases from 1993 to February 2009 for studies on patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent SN biopsy after NAC followed by an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).

RESULTS

Of 574 eligible studies, 27 were included in this review with a total study population of 2148 patients. The pooled SN identification rate was 90.9% (95% confidence interval (CI)=88.0-93.1%) and the false-negative rate was 10.5% (95% CI=8.1-13.6%). Negative predictive value and accuracy after NAC were 89.0% (95% CI=85.1-92.1%) and 94.4% (95% CI=92.6-95.8%), respectively. The reported SN success rates were heterogeneous and several variables were reported to be associated with decreased SN accuracy, i.e. initially positive clinical nodal status.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a potential role for SN biopsy following NAC which could be considered on an individual basis. However, there is insufficient evidence to recommend this as a standard procedure. Further research with subgroup analysis using variables reported to be associated with decreased SN accuracy is required in order to clearly define its value in the subgroups of breast cancer patients.

Current surgery for breast cancer

Surgeons retain the central role in the multidisciplinary care of the breast cancer patient. While technical details of the operations for these patients remain important, effective evidence-based decision making may be even more so. Advances in the methods of breast cancer diagnosis, localization techniques and surgical therapies, as well as the expanded role of the surgeon in breast cancer prevention, radiation therapy and the treatment of distant disease, requires surgeons to stay up to date with the available evidence. Herein, we present a review of the current surgical therapy of invasive breast cancer.

Breast cancer sentinel node identification and classification after neoadjuvant chemotherapy-systematic review and meta analysis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Breast cancer is the leading cause of mortality in women worldwide. Lymphatic mapping with sentinel node biopsy has the potential to reduce the morbidity associated with breast cancer staging in women after neoadjuvant therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of world literature between 1996 and 2007 of sentinel node mapping in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma after chemotherapy was undertaken. Potentially eligible studies were identified using database-specific search strategies incorporating appropriate Boolean combinations of the keywords sentinel node biopsy or sentinel node localization or lymphatic mapping; breast cancer or malignancy or neoplasm; and preoperative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The electronic searches were augmented with a manual search of reference lists from identified articles. Successful lymph node mapping, defined as successful identification rate (SIR), and false-negative rate (FNR) was summarized using a bivariate random effects mixed model. The extent of heterogeneity was assessed using the inconsistency statistic. The effect of study level covariates, such as use of immunohistochemistry or dual mapping technique, and individual quality criteria, such as study design or multi-institution participation, on SIR and FNR were analyzed using metaregression.

RESULTS

A total of 24 trials of 1799 subjects were reported that met eligibility criteria. All studies identified were published between 2000 and 2007. Lymph node involvement was found in 758 patients (37%) and ranged from 25% to 96% across studies. The proportion of patients who had successful lymph node mapping ranged from 63% to 100%, with 79% of studies reporting a rate of less than 95%. The summary successful identification rate was 0.896 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.860-0.923) with moderate heterogeneity. The summary FNR was 0.084 (95% CI 0.064-0.109) with no significant heterogeneity. Increasing prevalence of lymph node involvement and same-day mapping and lymph node dissection both significantly reduced the FNR.

CONCLUSIONS

The present systematic review demonstrates robust estimates of successful identification rate and false-negative rates of sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy after neoadjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer patients. With a 90% SIR and 8% FNR, this technique is a reliable tool for planning treatment in this population as an alternative to completion axillary lymph node dissection.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer: findings from the Austrian Sentinel Node Study Group

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become an accurate alternative to axillary lymph node dissection for early breast cancer. However, data are still insufficient as regards the combination of SLNB with preoperative chemotherapy (PC).

METHODS

The Austrian Sentinel Node Study Group investigated 167 patients who underwent SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection after 3 to 6 courses of PC. SLNB was limited to patients with a clinically negative axilla after PC. Blue dye was used in 29 cases (17%), and tracers were used in 20 (12%). A combination of the two methods was applied in most patients (n = 120; 72%).

RESULTS

At least 1 sentinel lymph node (SLN) was identified in 144 patients (identification rate, 85%): in 86% by blue dye alone, in 65% by tracers alone, and in 88% by a combination of methods. The SLN was positive in 70 women (42%) and was the only positive node with otherwise negative axillary nodes in 39 patients (23%). In 6 cases, the SLN was diagnosed as negative although tumor infiltration was detected in an upper node of the axillary basin (false-negative rate, 8%; 6 of 76 patients; sensitivity, 92%). At least 62 patients (37%) were free of tumor cells in the SLN and in the axillary nodes.

CONCLUSION

The results of SLNB after PC are comparable to the results of SLNB without PC. Further investigation in a prospective setting is warranted to confirm these promising results.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: results of Ganglion Sentinelle et Chimiotherapie Neoadjuvante, a French prospective multicentric study

PURPOSE

To determine the detection rate, the false-negative rate, and the accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective multicentric study was initiated to evaluate the results of SLN biopsy with the combined method after NAC for advanced large operable breast cancer.

RESULTS

From September 2003 to March 2007, 195 patients enrolled from 12 institutions were found suitable for evaluation. The detection rate was 90% (176 of 195 patients), and the false-negative rate was 11.5% (six of 52 patients). Patients without axillary palpable nodes (N0) before NAC had a better detection rate compared with patients with axillary suspicious nodes (N1, 94.6% v 81.5%; P = .008). The false-negative rate was not correlated with clinical nodal status before NAC (9.4% v 15%; P = .66).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the feasibility of SLN biopsy after NAC in the case of large operable breast cancer. The detection rate, false-negative rate, and accuracy do not differ from those obtained in the case of early breast cancer without NAC, thus demonstrating the feasibility of SLN biopsy after NAC.

The sentinel node in breast cancer

Biopsy of the sentinel lymph node now forms part of routine management in many centres dealing with early stage breast cancer. This article seeks to discuss developments over the past number of years and to summarise current practice.

The predicted probability of having positive non-sentinel lymph nodes in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for large operable breast cancer

The accuracy of the nomogram in women with positive sentinel nodes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the nomogram in patients receiving NCT. Between December 1999 and December 2005, we identified 233 patients who had a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and complete axillary lymph node dissection at Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Thirty-two patients (14%) had presented with clinically N0 breast cancer (BC) for which NCT was administered. The computerised BC nomogram was used to calculate the probability of non-sentinel node metastases utilising tumour size before NCT and after NCT for the same patient. The discrimination of the nomogram was assessed by calculating the area under (AUC) the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). The median patient age was 51.5 (range: 39-66) years in the NCT group of patients. Twelve patients (37%) had positive axillary non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLNs). The nomogram was first validated in our institution for 201 patients without NCT and the predicted accuracy of the nomogram by the AUC was 0.73. The area under the ROC was identical regardless of whether pre- or posttreatment tumour size was used to determine predicted probability of NSLN metastases (0.66). The predictive accuracy of the nomogram was found to have less power for patients receiving NCT (0.66) than the non-NCT group of patients.

Surgical issues and preoperative systemic therapy

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment approach for patients with locally advanced breast cancer, where primary disease downstaging clears improves operability. Previously unresectable disease may then be controlled by mastectomy, and some patients may even become eligible for lumpectomy. The disease downstaging benefits as well as the ability to determine chemosensitivity, have motivated expanded applications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy to include selected cases of early-stage breast cancer. In this setting, many women will become improved candidates for breast conservation surgery performed via smaller-volume lumpectomies. Optimal utilization of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy approach requires special attention by the surgeon regarding diagnostic biopsies (percutaneous needle biopsies are preferred); preoperative planning (insertion of radio-opaque clips to mark tumor bed prior to completion of chemotherapy response; careful imaging to determine extent of disease); and final surgical decision-making (including comprehensive preoperative imaging to decide between lumpectomy and mastectomy).

Management of patients with locally advanced breast cancer

The indications and benefits of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) continue to evolve. Advances in systemic adjuvant therapy and targeted therapy for breast cancer are likely to play an increasingly important role in control of locoregional as well as distant disease. Ongoing scrutiny of patterns of chest wall failure will be required to define the net benefit derived from PMRT. This article discusses the 2001 American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines for PMRT and current practices using PMRT in selected groups of patients who have breast cancer.

Current controversies in the management of early breast cancer

Medical professionals in general, and medical oncologists in particular, have highly stressful practices because they are under constant pressure to have the highest-quality, up-to-date evidence available in order to make the right decision for each individual patient. From a practical point of view, being updated on oncological and other medical specialties may seem an insurmountable task because the number of scientific publications has increased dramatically. The use of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials or the application of results obtained from high-quality randomised controlled trials are some of the most common ways to address this need. Unfortunately, they do not cover all complex clinical situations that the majority of medical oncologists face in their outpatient consultations. In this review, we report the conclusions achieved in a multiexpert meeting where five important controversies in the treatment of breast cancer were analysed. Five highly experienced medical oncologists were required to defend an affirmative answer and another five were required to defend a negative answer for each of the clinical questions. After that, a one-day meeting was organised to debate each clinical question and to reach a consensus. We report here the content of this multi-expert meeting along with the conclusions drawn.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate in patients with documented node-positive breast cancer at presentation

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy for incorporating lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy into the management of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial. Previous studies of sentinel node biopsy performed following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have largely reported on patients whose prechemotherapy, pathologic axillary nodal status was unknown. We report findings using a novel comprehensive approach to axillary management of node-positive-patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

We evaluated 54 consecutive breast cancer patients with biopsy-proven axillary nodal metastases at the time of diagnosis that underwent lymphatic mapping with nodal biopsy as well as concomitant axillary lymph node dissection after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All cases were treated at a single comprehensive cancer center between 2001 and 2005.

RESULTS

The sentinel node identification rate after delivery of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 98%. Thirty-six patients (66%) had residual axillary metastases (including eight patients that had undergone resection of metastatic sentinel nodes at the time of diagnosis), and in 12 cases (31%) the residual metastatic disease was limited to the sentinel lymph node. The final, post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy sentinel node was falsely negative in three cases (8.6%). The negative final sentinel node accurately identified patients with no residual axillary disease in 17 cases (32%).

CONCLUSIONS

Sentinel lymph node biopsy performed after the delivery of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with documented nodal disease at presentation accurately identified cases that may have been downstaged to node-negative status and can spare this subset of patients (32%) from experiencing the morbidity of an axillary dissection.

Feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with documented axillary metastases

BACKGROUND

The feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy has been demonstrated in a number of large, single-institution studies. However, a relative contraindication to SLN biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy is the presence of axillary metastases at initial diagnosis. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and accuracy of SLN biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with documented axillary metastases at presentation.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2002, 69 patients who had axillary metastases identified by ultrasound-guided, fine-needle aspiration underwent SLN biopsy after treatment on prospective, preoperative chemotherapy protocols. All but 8 patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Those 8 patients either declined additional surgery or were offered enrollment in other institutional protocols.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 49 years, and the median primary tumor size was 4 cm. The SLN identification rate was 92.8%. Thirty-one of 64 patients (48.4%) had successfully mapped, positive SLNs. Sixty-one patients underwent ALND, including 5 patients who did not have an SLN identified. In the 56 patients in whom a SLN was identified and an ALND was performed, 10 patients had a false-negative SLN (25%).

CONCLUSIONS

SLN biopsy was feasible after preoperative chemotherapy, even in patients who initially presented with cytologically proven, lymph node-positive disease. However, the false-negative rate of SLN biopsy in this group of patients was much higher than that observed in clinically lymph node-negative patients. Based on the current results, the status of the SLN cannot be used as a reliable indicator of the presence or absence of residual disease in the axilla in this patient population.

Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy and the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is standard management for women who have locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer, but can be applied to all women who may require postoperative chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Disease-free survival and overall survival are equivalent between patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and patients treated with the same regimen postoperatively. Preoperative chemotherapy can offer women less morbid surgical treatment by down-staging both the primary breast tumor and axillary metastases. Finally, response to chemotherapy can inform clinicians of the chemosensitivity of the tumor, and can predict long-term outcome for women who have breast cancer.

Contraindications of sentinel lymph node biopsy: are there any really?

BACKGROUND

One of the most exciting and talked about new surgical techniques in breast cancer surgery is the sentinel lymph node biopsy. It is an alternative procedure to standard axillary lymph node dissection, which makes possible less invasive surgery and side effects for patients with early breast cancer that wouldn't benefit further from axillary lymph node clearance. Sentinel lymph node biopsy helps to accurately evaluate the status of the axilla and the extent of disease, but also determines appropriate adjuvant treatment and long-term follow-up. However, like all surgical procedures, the sentinel lymph node biopsy is not appropriate for each and every patient.

METHODS

In this article we review the absolute and relative contraindications of the procedure in respect to clinically positive axilla, neoadjuvant therapy, tumor size, multicentric and multifocal disease, in situ carcinoma, pregnancy, age, body-mass index, allergies to dye and/or radio colloid and prior breast and/or axillary surgery.

RESULTS

Certain conditions involving host factors and tumor biologic characteristics may have a negative impact on the success rate and accuracy of the procedure. The overall fraction of patients unsuitable or with multiple risk factors that may compromise the success of the sentinel lymph node biopsy, is very small. Nevertheless, these patients need to be successfully identified, appropriately advised and cautioned, and so do the surgeons that perform the procedure.

CONCLUSION

When performed by an experienced multi-disciplinary team, the SLNB is a highly effective and accurate alternative to standard level I and II axillary clearance in the vast majority of patients with early breast cancer.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy as the new standard of care in the surgical treatment for breast cancer

During the recent years, based on the results of validation studies, the sentinel lymph node biopsy has replaced routine axillary dissection as the new standard of care in early breast cancer. The technique represents a minimally invasive, highly accurate method for axillary staging, which could spare approximately 65-70% of patients unnecessary axillary dissection and its related morbidity. Several technical and clinical controversies have been raised during the development of this new technique; the authors review the most important issues, some questions have already been answered and others are still under debate. As far as the technical aspects are concerned, mapping techniques, appropriate surgical training, options for pathological examination of sentinel lymph nodes and the issue of nonaxillary sentinel lymph nodes are discussed. An update on clinical controversies demonstrates that factors such as large tumor size, palpable axillary nodes, multifocality and multicentricity, previous breast and axillary surgery, and pregnancy are no longer regarded as absolute contraindications for sentinel lymph node biopsy. Feasibility, accuracy and timing of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy remain unsolved issues, as well as the indication of the technique for some subgroups of in situ lesions. Finally, one of the most attractive open forums for debate will be discussed: whether or not completion of axillary dissection in the case of positive SLN is always required.

Current Trends and Controversies over Pre-operative Chemotherapy for Women with Operable Breast Cancer

The multi-disciplinary approach, including surgery, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and radiation therapy, has become the standard treatment for primary breast cancer patients. The indication of pre-operative chemotherapy has been extended to women with potentially operable breast cancer based on the results of large randomized studies and has become an attractive option that extends the chance of breast conservation. The clinical and pathological responses to pre-operative chemotherapy correlates with long-term outcome. The anthracycline-containing regimen is now considered the standard. Sequential administration of non-cross-resistant drugs, namely taxanes, improves local tumor response but its long-term benefit has been controversial. Prediction of response to pre-operative chemotherapy still remains a challenge. Identification of useful predictive markers and development of molecular-targeted drugs is the key to individualized therapy in the future.