1
|
Mal R, Magner A, David J, Datta J, Vallabhaneni M, Kassem M, Manouchehri J, Willingham N, Stover D, Vandeusen J, Sardesai S, Williams N, Wesolowski R, Lustberg M, Ganju RK, Ramaswamy B, Cherian MA. Estrogen Receptor Beta (ERβ): A Ligand Activated Tumor Suppressor. Front Oncol 2020; 10:587386. [PMID: 33194742 PMCID: PMC7645238 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.587386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) belong to a superfamily of nuclear receptors called steroid hormone receptors, which, upon binding ligand, dimerize and translocate to the nucleus where they activate or repress the transcription of a large number of genes, thus modulating critical physiologic processes. ERβ has multiple isoforms that show differing association with prognosis. Expression levels of the full length ERβ1 isoform are often lower in aggressive cancers as compared to normal tissue. High ERβ1 expression is associated with improved overall survival in women with breast cancer. The promise of ERβ activation, as a potential targeted therapy, is based on concurrent activation of multiple tumor suppressor pathways with few side effects compared to chemotherapy. Thus, ERβ is a nuclear receptor with broad-spectrum tumor suppressor activity, which could serve as a potential treatment target in a variety of human cancers including breast cancer. Further development of highly selective agonists that lack ERα agonist activity, will be necessary to fully harness the potential of ERβ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Mal
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Alexa Magner
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Joel David
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Jharna Datta
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Meghna Vallabhaneni
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Mahmoud Kassem
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Cancer, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Jasmine Manouchehri
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Natalie Willingham
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Daniel Stover
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Cancer, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Jeffery Vandeusen
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Cancer, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Sagar Sardesai
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Cancer, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Nicole Williams
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Cancer, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Robert Wesolowski
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Cancer, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Maryam Lustberg
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Cancer, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Ramesh K Ganju
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Cancer, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Mathew A Cherian
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Cancer, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leigh Pearce C, Near AM, Butler JL, Van Den Berg D, Bretsky P, Conti DV, Stram DO, Pike MC, Hirschhorn JN, Wu AH. Comprehensive evaluation of ESR2 variation and ovarian cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008; 17:393-6. [PMID: 18268123 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-07-2512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Studies indicate that estrogen receptor beta, encoded by the ESR2 gene on chromosome 14q, may play a role in ovarian carcinogenesis. Using the genetic structure data generated by the Breast and Prostate Cohort Consortium (BPC3), we have comprehensively characterized the role of haplotype diversity in ESR2 and risk of ovarian cancer. Five haplotypes with a frequency of > or =5% were observed in White subjects and five haplotype tagging SNPs (htSNP) were selected to capture the locus diversity with a minimum R(h)(2) of 0.81. The htSNPs were genotyped in 574 White controls, 417 White invasive ovarian cancer cases, and 123 White borderline ovarian cancer cases from case-control studies carried out in Los Angeles County from 1994 through 2004. No statistically significant association was observed between the five htSNPs and related haplotypes and risk of ovarian cancer overall. Haplotype D was associated with a nonstatistically significant increased risk of invasive ovarian cancer overall (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-2.02; P = 0.11) relative to the most common haplotype and a statistically significant increased risk of invasive clear cell ovarian cancer (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-11.73; P = 0.016). Haplotype D was also reported by the BPC3 to be associated with increased risk of breast cancer. This haplotype warrants further investigation to rule out any effect with invasive ovarian cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celeste Leigh Pearce
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lukanova A, Kaaks R. Endogenous Hormones and Ovarian Cancer: Epidemiology and Current Hypotheses. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005. [DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.98.14.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
The effect of major epidemiologic risk factors for ovarian cancer has been reviewed in the light of several hormonal hypotheses, including the gonadotropin, androgens, progesterone, estrogens, insulin-like growth factor-I, and insulin hypotheses. The role of inclusion cyst formation and Mullerian epithelium differentiation in the pathology of the disease are also briefly outlined. Although based on limited data, the observed tendency in current evidence suggests possible etiologic roles for elevated androgens and estrogens and decreased progesterone in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer. A direct effect of gonadotropins cannot be entirely ruled out, but it is plausible that their effect on ovarian cancer risk is mediated by stimulation of ovarian steroidogenesis. Insulin-like growth factor-I also emerges as a hormone that may be directly involved in the pathogenesis of the disease, but thus far only one prospective study has examined this association. Hyperinsulinemia is an unlikely risk factor for ovarian cancer. The observed tendency for an increased risk with androgens from ovarian origin (in premenopausal women), the lack of association with adrenal androgens, and the relatively weak associations observed with obesity, hormonal replacement therapy use, and endogenous hormones after menopause suggest that ovarian synthesis of sex steroids rather than their circulating levels may be etiologically important. More data from prospective studies will be crucial to improve our understanding of the etiologic role of endogenous hormones in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer. Such data will ultimately provide opportunities for research targeted; at early detection and preventive interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annekatrin Lukanova
- 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York and
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bardin A, Hoffmann P, Boulle N, Katsaros D, Vignon F, Pujol P, Lazennec G. Involvement of estrogen receptor beta in ovarian carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 2004; 64:5861-9. [PMID: 15313930 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Knockout and expression studies suggest that estrogen receptor beta (ERbeta) plays a prominent role in ovarian function and pathology. Moreover, ovarian cancers are characterized by high morbidity and low responsiveness to anti-estrogens. Here we demonstrate, using quantitative PCR to measure ERalpha and ERbeta levels in 58 ovarian cancer patients, that ERbeta expression decreased in cysts and ovarian carcinomas as compared with normal ovaries and that this decrease is attributable only to a selective loss in ERbeta expression during cancer progression. To address the question of a possible involvement of ERbeta in ovarian cancers, we restored ERalpha and ERbeta expression in two human ovarian cancer cell lines PEO14 (ERalpha-negative) and BG1 (ERalpha-positive) using adenoviral delivery. ERalpha, but not ERbeta, could induce progesterone receptor and fibulin-1C. Moreover, ERalpha and ERbeta had opposite actions on cyclin D1 gene regulation, because ERbeta down-regulated cyclin D1 gene expression, whereas ERalpha increased cyclin D1 levels. Interestingly, ERbeta expression strongly inhibited PEO14 and BG1 cell proliferation and cell motility in a ligand-independent manner, whereas ERalpha had no marked effect. Induction of apoptosis by ERbeta also contributed to the decreased proliferation of ovarian cancer cells, as shown by Annexin V staining. This study shows that ERbeta is an important regulator of proliferation and motility of ovarian cancer and provides the first evidence for a proapoptotic role of ERbeta. The loss of ERbeta expression may thus be an important event leading to the development of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
5
|
Moll F, Katsaros D, Lazennec G, Hellio N, Roger P, Giacalone PL, Chalbos D, Maudelonde T, Rochefort H, Pujol P. Estrogen induction and overexpression of fibulin-1C mRNA in ovarian cancer cells. Oncogene 2002; 21:1097-107. [PMID: 11850827 DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2001] [Revised: 10/26/2001] [Accepted: 11/07/2001] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Fibulin-1 is an extracellular matrix protein induced by estradiol in estrogen receptor (ER) positive ovarian cancer cell lines. Alternative splicing of fibulin-1 mRNA results in four different variants named A, B, C and D that may have distinct biological functions. We studied the relative expression of fibulin-1 mRNA variants and their estrogen regulation in human ovarian cancer cells. In ovarian tissues and cancer cell lines, fibulin-1C and -1D are the predominant forms, whereas fibulin-1A and -1B are weakly expressed. We developed a competitive PCR assay based on coamplification of fibulin-1C and -1D to study the relative expression of these fibulin-1 variants in human ovarian samples. In ovarian cancer cell lines and ovarian cancer samples, there was a marked increase in the fibulin-1C:1D and fibulin-1C:HPRT mRNA ratios as compared to normal ovaries. In the BG1 estrogen receptor positive ovarian cancer cell line, fibulin-1C mRNA was induced by estradiol in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Since others and we have previously shown an increased expression of ERalpha as compared to ERbeta in ovarian cancer cells, we investigated whether ERalpha or ERbeta is involved in this induction. For this aim, MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line, which expresses both low basal levels of ERs and fibulin-1, was infected with recombinant ERalpha or ERbeta encoding adenovirus and treated with estradiol. Fibulin-1C was induced by estradiol in ERalpha- but not ERbeta-infected cells, suggesting that fibulin-1C induction is mediated through ERalpha. In ovarian tumors, a trend towards a correlation between fibulin-1C and ERalpha expression levels was noted. In conclusion, this study showed an increased fibulin-1C:-1D mRNA ratio in ovarian cancer cells as compared to normal ovaries. This finding suggests that the C variant may be involved in ovarian carcinogenesis. Fibulin-1C overexpression may thus be a clue for the understanding of a putative role of estrogens in ERalpha promoted ovarian tumor progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederic Moll
- Unité INSERM 540, 60 rue de Navacelles, 34095 Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jazaeri AA, Nunes KJ, Dalton MS, Xu M, Shupnik MA, Rice LW. Well-differentiated endometrial adenocarcinomas and poorly differentiated mixed mullerian tumors have altered ER and PR isoform expression. Oncogene 2001; 20:6965-9. [PMID: 11687977 DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2001] [Revised: 06/14/2001] [Accepted: 07/05/2001] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Both the estrogen receptor (ER) and the progesterone receptor (PR) have two subtypes: ER-alpha and beta, and PR-A and -B, respectively. These subtypes differ in function and expression, and recent reports have correlated changes in the normal proportions of these isoforms with neoplastic states. We investigated ER and PR isoform expression in normal pre- and post-menopausal endometrium, well-differentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma, and poorly differentiated malignant mixed mullerian tumors (MMMTs). Semi-quantitative RT-PCR and immunoblotting were used to measure receptor mRNA and protein expression. Estrogen receptor-alpha/beta mRNA ratios were significantly higher in postmenopausal (27.3) compared to premenopausal endometrium (4.9) mainly as a result of lower ER-beta expression in the former. Compared to age-matched postmenopausal controls, the ER-alpha/beta ratio was reduced in both grade I adenocarcinoma and MMMT specimens (3.3 and 6.8, respectively), due to a selective loss of ER-alpha. The relative abundance of PR-A and PR-B mRNA remained unchanged between all tissue subtypes. Total PR protein, however, was significantly reduced in MMMTs compared to all other groups. Thus, sex steroid receptor expression is significantly and differentially altered in well-differentiated and poorly-differentiated endometrial cancers. Both cancers exhibit decreased ER-alpha expression and the MMMTs also demonstrate a significant loss of PR protein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A Jazaeri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Virginia, Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, VA 22906, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|