Fecal incontinence in women

Impact of high-level sport practice on anal incontinence in a healthy young female population

BACKGROUND

Regular physical activity usually confers health benefits, but high-level sport may induce harmful outcomes, such as pelvic floor dysfunction. Urinary incontinence (UI) was previously documented, but few data are available about anal incontinence (AI) in female athletes. Our aim was to determine the role of high-level sport practice on AI in a young, healthy female population.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we included women aged 18-40 years. Self-administered questionnaires were delivered to each female volunteer. Two groups were defined: (1) intensive sport (IS) group: high-level sport (>8 hours weekly), and (2) nonintensive sport (NIS) group: all other subjects.

RESULTS

Of the 393 women enrolled, 169 were in the IS group and 224 were in the NIS group. Women of the IS group were significantly younger than the others (21.74±4.28 vs. 24.87±5.61 years, p<0.001) and had less births (0.07±0.31 vs. 0.20±0.62, p=0.005). The prevalence of AI was statistically higher in the IS group than in the NIS group (14.8% vs. 4.9%, p=0.001), as was UI (33.1% vs. 18.3%, p=0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that IS practice (odds ratio [OR] 2.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-6.87, p=0.010) and body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.28, p=0.033) were significantly linked to AI when taking into account major confounding factors (age and births). In the IS group, AI was mainly represented by loss of flatus in 84%.

CONCLUSIONS

High-level sport appears to be a significant independent risk factor for AI in healthy young women. These results suggest that preventive measures, such as pelvic floor muscle training, may be proposed for this young population.

Fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence (FI) has a significant social and economic impact on the patient and the community. In women, obstetric injury is commonly associated with the development of FI. Understanding FI is aided by a good knowledge of the pelvic floor anatomy and continence mechanisms. This same knowledge along with a good history and physical can guide the physician in selecting appropriate studies and treatment options. Surgical treatment of FI is currently the best option when a sphincter defect exists. The long-term prognosis of the repair is disappointing, however. Ongoing investigations continue in the hopes of getting closer to a cure and to reclaiming the patient's former quality of life.

Posterior pelvic floor compartment disorders

Posterior pelvic floor compartment disorders generally refer to functional anorectal disturbances that by definition are symptom-based rather than anatomical defect-based and have a significant impact on quality of life. Symptoms attributed to the posterior compartment are often non-specific and associated with structural, neuromuscular and functional defects giving rise to symptoms of prolapse, pelvic pressure, faecal incontinence, stool trapping and constipation. They may range from mild to incapacitating and occur in varying combinations. While symptoms of constipation and incontinence may conceptually represent the opposing extremes of normal anorectal function, the dynamic interrelationships between the different pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the development of these disorders suggest a more complex explanation. Faecal continence and defecation are dependent on several neurological and anatomical factors that involve coordinated physiological processes, including intestinal transit and absorption, colonic transit, rectal compliance, anorectal sensation and continence mechanism. However, it is well recognized that pelvic floor symptoms originating from one compartment do not imply absent pathology in another compartment. Furthermore, symptoms associated with one disorder (such as constipation related to functional obstructed defecation) can be causative in the sequential development of other pelvic floor disorders, such as a urogenital prolapse syndrome, that may further exacerbate symptoms. In addition, it has been found that treatment that corrects one problem may improve, worsen or even predispose to other symptoms from another compartment. Consequently, while the concept of global pelvic floor dysfunction has emerged, the traditional single speciality referral and evaluation of pelvic floor problems continues to foster potentially segregated management strategies that can overlook the relevance of concomitant symptomatology. The evaluation and treatment of posterior pelvic compartment disorders needs to assume an individualized but multidisciplinary therapeutic approach. Given the variation in surgical approaches described to correct anatomical integrity of posterior pelvic compartment deficits, the consensus on optimal management has yet to be achieved. Therefore, it is critical that outcome measures following surgery are clearly defined. Treatment is to a great extent dictated to by functional severity and the impact that symptoms have on quality of life. Long-term follow-up should ensure that the potential for complications is minimized and satisfactory bowel, bladder and sexual function is maintained.

The effect of pregnancy and mode of delivery on the prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the relative effects of pregnancy and mode of delivery on the prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective, observational multicenter study of women presenting to 6 gynecology clinics. Demographic data collected included: height, weight, gravidity, parity, and number of vaginal deliveries. Patients were diagnosed with incontinence by questionnaire. Standard univariate logistic regression analyses' were performed to determine the contribution of pregnancy, mode of delivery, and BMI on the prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence.

RESULTS

One thousand and four women were enrolled over an 18-month period. Two hundred and thirty-seven and 128 subjects had urinary and fecal incontinence, respectively. Odds ratio (95% CI) calculated for the prevalence of urinary incontinence by pregnancy and mode of delivery were: any term pregnancy vs no term pregnancy was 2.46 (1.53-3.95), any term pregnancy but no vaginal deliveries (cesarean section only) vs no term pregnancy was 1.95 (0.99-3.80), any term pregnancy and at least 1 vaginal delivery vs no term pregnancy was 2.53 (1.57-4.07), and any term pregnancy but no vaginal delivery (cesarean section only) vs any term pregnancy, and at least 1 vaginal delivery was 1.30 (0.77-3.95). Odds ratio (95% CI) calculated for the prevalence of fecal incontinence by pregnancy and mode of delivery were: any term pregnancy vs no term pregnancy was 2.26 (1.22-4.19), any term pregnancy but no vaginal deliveries (cesarean section only) vs no term pregnancy was 1.13 (0.43-2.96), any term pregnancy and at least 1 vaginal delivery vs no term pregnancy was 2.41 (1.30-4.49), and any term pregnancy but no vaginal deliveries (cesarean section only) vs any term pregnancy, and at least 1 vaginal delivery was 2.15 (0.97-4.77). BMI and age did not impact these results.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy increases the risk of urinary and fecal incontinence. Cesarean section does not decrease the risk of urinary or fecal incontinence compared to pregnancy with a vaginal delivery.

Recurrent Risk of Anal Sphincter Laceration Among Women With Vaginal Deliveries

OBJECTIVE

The first aim of this study was to estimate the impact of anal sphincter laceration during the first delivery on the risk of recurrence in the second delivery. The second aim was to estimate the absolute risk of anal sphincter laceration in the second delivery according to the history of anal sphincter laceration and birth weight.

METHODS

In this population-based cohort study, the study sample comprised all women included in the Norwegian Medical Birth Registry with 2 consecutive singleton vaginal deliveries during the period 1967-1998 (n = 486,463). The impact of prior anal sphincter laceration on recurrent anal sphincter laceration was estimated as crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

Anal sphincter laceration during first delivery increased the risk for a sphincter laceration in the next delivery, (adjusted OR 4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8-4.8). Other risk factors were birth weight (adjusted OR 23.6, 95% CI 16.5-33.6, birth weight > 5,000 g versus birth weight < 3,000 grams), use of forceps (adjusted OR 5.1, 95% CI 4.3-6.0), use of vacuum (adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7), and period of delivery (adjusted OR 4.3, 95% CI 3.7-5.0 for 1995-1998 versus 1967-1975). The absolute risks for anal sphincter laceration at second delivery for women with prior laceration were 1.3% (95% CI 0.4-3.2%) for birth weight less than 3,000 g and 23.3% (95% CI 11.8-38.6%) for birth weight more than 5,000 g.

CONCLUSION

Only 10% of women with anal sphincter laceration at second delivery had a history of prior laceration. Prior anal sphincter laceration is associated with increased risk of laceration in second delivery, in particular in women who carry children with high birth weight.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II-2.

Fecal incontinence in older patients

Fecal incontinence (FI), the involuntary passage of fecal material through the anus, is a common medical problem in older people, especially in frail older nursing home residents. FI is often associated with urinary incontinence. Severe constipation leading to fecal impaction, laxative abuse, diarrhea, cognitive impairment, senescence, and neuromuscular disorders including autonomic neuropathy, are among the leading causes of FI in older patients. FI affects patients' physical and psychological well-being, and is responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality in older patients. This results in significant healthcare costs. Comprehensive management of this disorder requires a systematic approach including thorough history, physical examination, and step-wise evaluation. This review in contrast to others published in last decade, focuses on management of FI in frail older nursing home patients, who require an individualized approach, which should be minimally invasive and cost-effective. In many cases of FI, treatment of the underlying condition; adequate control of diarrhea, constipation, or fecal impaction; adjustment of medications; and proper feeding may control or reduce FI. Advanced tests are often not necessary in this population.

Pelvic floor dysfunction: a conceptual framework for collaborative patient-centred care

BACKGROUND

Pelvic floor dysfunction is a disorder predominantly affecting females. It is common and undermines the quality of lives of at least one-third of adult women and is a growing component of women's health care needs. Identifying and supporting these needs is a major public health issue with a strong psychosocial and economic basis. The importance of the interdependence of mechanical, neural, endocrine and environmental factors in the development of pelvic floor dysfunction is well recognized. There is a paucity of data investigating the true prevalence, incidence, specific risk factors, poor outcome of treatment and subsequent prevention strategies for women with multiple pelvic floor symptomatology.

AIM

The aim of this paper is to present a critical review of the literature on the mechanism, presentation and management of multiple symptomatology in pelvic floor dysfunction and to propose a conceptual framework by which to consider the impact and problems women with pelvic floor dysfunction face.

METHODS

A comprehensive although not exhaustive literature search was carried out using medical and nursing databases BIOMED (1966-2002) NESLI (1989-2002) and EMBASE (1980-2003) CINAHL (1982-2003) and Cochrane databases using the key words 'pelvic floor dysfunction', 'incontinence (urinary and faecal)', 'genital prolapse', sexual dysfunction, 'aetiology', epidemiology' and 'treatment'. Retrospective and prospective studies and previous clinical reviews were considered for review. The articles retrieved were hand searched for further citations and referrals were made to relevant textbooks. Particular attention was paid to papers that focused on multiple pelvic floor symptoms.

FINDINGS

Pelvic floor dysfunction affects women of all ages and is associated with functional problems of the pelvic floor. Pelvic floor dysfunction describes a wide range of clinical problems that rarely occur in isolation. Inaccurate knowledge, myths and misconceptions of the incidence, cause and treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction abound. Given the significance of the aetiological contribution of factors such as pregnancy and obstetric trauma, ageing, hormonal status, hysterectomy and lifestyle in the development of pelvic floor disorders, the assessment, management and prevention of pelvic floor dysfunction remains a neglected part of many health care professionals educational preparation. This not only has major economic but also psychosocial implications for women, the general population and women's health care providers. A conceptual framework is also discussed that considers not only the impact and difficulties women with pelvic floor dysfunction face but also areas in which health care professionals can improve assessment and eventual treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This paper demonstrates gaps in the current provision of women's health care services. Functional pelvic floor problems are perceived to have low priority compared with other health disorders, and treatment remains sub-optimal. Inherent in achieving and promoting better health care services for women is the need for better collaborative approaches to care. There is a need to identify and develop comprehensive interdisciplinary, multi-professional strategies that improve the assessment and treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction in primary, secondary and tertiary settings. If this area of women's health care is to be improved nurses, whether community- or hospital-based, must play a front-line role in challenging and changing current practices. Education needs to be given greater priority and the development of a specialist pelvic floor nurse role explored. Such strategies could substantially influence a more effective approach to women's health care needs, result in improved treatment outcomes and liberate women from the embarrassment, social and sexual isolation, restriction to employment and leisure opportunities and potential loss of independence that multiple symptomatology can generate.

Preliminary evaluation of an injectable anal sphincter bulking agent (Durasphere) in the management of faecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

It has been previously shown that 'bulking' of internal anal sphincter defects may provide an effective method to treat patients with faecal incontinence, but the benefit wears off with time.

AIM

To assess the efficacy of a larger molecule, bulking agent (Durasphere) over the short- and long-term in patients with an internal anal sphincter defect refractory to conservative management.

PATIENTS

Eighteen patients (nine male, nine female) with a mean age of 60 years were recruited. All patients had persistent faecal leakage/soiling.

METHODS

Durasphere was injected in the submucosal plane to restore anal canal symmetry. All patients had anorectal physiology, endoanal ultrasound, continence grading, patient satisfaction and quality of life scores assessed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up is 28.5 months. Changes from baseline were not statistically significant up to 6 months. At 12 months there was significant improvement in the continence grading (P=0.003), patient satisfaction (P=0.053) and all quality of life subscales: lifestyle (P=0.004), coping (P=0.011), depression (P=0.024) and embarrassment (P=0.059). Anorectal physiological parameters apart from the maximum tolerable rectal volume at 12 months (P=0.036) showed no significant improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Anal sphincter bulking with Durasphere is safe and effective in the short term as well as the longer term. More importantly, there is no evidence of attenuation of effect over time.

Clinical, urodynamic, and manometric findings in women with combined fecal and urinary incontinence

AIMS

To determine the prevalence of fecal incontinence in patients with urinary incontinence, who were referred for urodynamic evaluation, and to compare clinical and manometric findings between double incontinence and isolated fecal incontinence.

METHODS

Nine hundred women with urinary and/or fecal incontinence were prospectively investigated. Patients with double incontinence (group 1) were compared with 38 women with isolated fecal incontinence (group 2). Clinical data regarding obstetric and urogynecologic history, bowel habit, and type of fecal incontinence were collected. Urodynamics and anal manometry were performed.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients (8.7%) presented double incontinence. A history of vaginal delivery and chronic straining was more frequent in patients with double incontinence (P=0.043). No differences were found in the severity of fecal incontinence. Physical examination showed a greater prevalence of rectocele (54% vs. 12%) in group 1. On urodynamics, 80% of women with double incontinence had stress urinary incontinence. Rectal sensation testing revealed a significantly higher rate of hyposensitivity in group 2 (22% vs. 43%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports a close association between combined stress urinary and fecal incontinence, history of vaginal delivery, and chronic straining.

Anatomy and physiology of the female perineal body with relevance to obstetrical injury and repair

The female perineal body is a mass of interlocking muscular, fascial, and fibrous components lying between the vagina and anorectum. The perineal body is also an integral attachment point for components of the urinary and fecal continence mechanisms, which are commonly damaged during vaginal childbirth. Repair of injuries to the perineal body caused by spontaneous tears or episiotomy are topics too often neglected in medical education. This review presents the anatomy and physiology of the female perineal body, as well as clinical considerations for pelvic reconstructive surgery.

The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery

OBJECTIVE

To define the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in a non-institutionalised community and to determine the relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery.

DESIGN

A representative population survey using the 1998 South Australian Health Omnibus Survey.

SAMPLE

Random selection of 4400 households; 3010 interviews were conducted in the respondents' homes by trained female interviewers. This cross sectional survey included men and women aged 15-97 years.

RESULTS

The prevalence of all types of self-reported urinary incontinence in men was 4.4% and in women was 35.3% (P<0.001). Urinary incontinence was more commonly reported in nulliparous women than men and increased after pregnancy according to parity and age. The highest prevalence (51.9%) was reported in women aged 70-74 years. The prevalence of flatus and faecal incontinence was 6.8% and 2.3% in men and 10.9% and 3.5% in women, respectively. Pregnancy (> 20 weeks), regardless of the mode of delivery, greatly increased the prevalence of major pelvic floor dysfunction, defined as any type of incontinence, symptoms of prolapse or previous pelvic floor surgery. Multivariate logistic regression showed that, compared with nulliparity, pelvic floor dysfunction was significantly associated with caesarean section (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5-4.3), spontaneous vaginal delivery (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.4-4.9) and at least one instrumental delivery (OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.8-6.6). The difference between caesarean and instrumental delivery was significant (P<0.03) but was not for caesarean and spontaneous delivery. Other associations with pelvic floor morbidity were age, body mass index, coughing, osteoporosis, arthritis and reduced quality of life scores. Symptoms of haemorrhoids also increased with age and parity and were reported in 19.9% of men and 30.2% of women.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic floor disorders are very common and are strongly associated with female gender, ageing, pregnancy, parity and instrumental delivery. Caesarean delivery is not associated with a significant reduction in long term pelvic floor morbidity compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery.