Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy: results following neurolysis of conducting neuromas-in-continuity

Current Concepts in Brachial Plexus Birth Injuries: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

Background

Brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) encompasses a spectrum of upper extremity paralysis cases following childbirth. The etiology of BPBI is multifactorial, involving maternal, obstetric, and neonatal associative factors. Despite opportunities for spontaneous recovery, recent literature demonstrates that a significant proportion of infants experience residual deficits and functional limitations as they age. Understanding the complex anatomy of the brachial plexus, clinical presentations of the pathology, diagnostic workup, current treatment options, and common secondary sequelae is instrumental for appropriate management of BPBI.

Methods

Following a comprehensive search strategy used by the authors to identify relevant literature relating to the progression, patho-anatomy, clinical presentation, management, and treatment of BPBI, this comprehensive narrative review outlines current approaches to assess, manage, and advance BPBI care.

Results

We advocate for prompt referral to specialized multicenter brachial plexus clinics for accurate diagnosis, timely intervention, and individualized patient-centered assessment. Further research is needed to elucidate mechanisms of injury, refine diagnostic protocols, and optimize long-term outcomes.

Conclusions

Collaboration between healthcare providers and families is paramount in providing comprehensive care for infants with BPBI. This review offers insights into the current understanding and management of BPBI, highlighting the importance of tailored approaches and intraoperative decision-making algorithms to optimize functional outcomes.

Advancing glenohumeral dysplasia treatment in brachial plexus birth injury: the end-to-side spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer technique

PURPOSE

Brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) is a common injury with the spectrum of disease prognosis ranging from spontaneous recovery to lifelong debilitating disability. A common sequela of BPBI is glenohumeral dysplasia (GHD) which, if not addressed early on, can lead to shoulder dysfunction as the child matures. However, there are no clear criteria for when to employ various surgical procedures for the correction of GHD.

METHODS

We describe our approach to correcting GDH in infants with BPBIs using a reverse end-to-side (ETS) transfer from the spinal accessory to the suprascapular nerve. This technique is employed in infants that present with GHD with poor external rotation (ER) function who would not necessitate a complete end-to-end transfer and are still too young for a tendon transfer. In this study, we present our outcomes in seven patients.

RESULTS

At presentation, all patients had persistent weakness of the upper trunk and functional limitations of the shoulder. Point-of-care ultrasounds confirmed GHD in each case. Five patients were male, and two patients were female, with a mean age of 3.3 months age (4 days-7 months) at presentation. Surgery was performed on average at 5.8 months of age (3-8.6 months). All seven patients treated with a reverse ETS approach had full recovery of ER according to active movement scores at the latest follow-up. Additionally, ultrasounds at the latest follow-up showed a complete resolution of GHD.

CONCLUSION

In infants with BPBI and evidence of GHD with poor ER, end-to-end nerve transfers, which initially downgrade function, or tendon transfers, that are not age-appropriate for the patient, are not recommended. Instead, we report seven successful cases of infants who underwent ETS spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer for the treatment of GHD following BPBI.

Rehabilitation protocols in neonates undergoing primary nerve surgery for upper brachial plexus palsy: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Surgical management is recommended in patients with severe neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) within the first 6 months of age to regain best possible function. Rehabilitation post-surgery remains relatively unexplored. This is a scoping review that explores, which rehabilitation modalities exist and how they vary for different microsurgical approaches in NBPP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search was conducted to include articles about upper trunk obstetric brachial plexus nerve microsurgery in pediatric patients that made mention of rehabilitation protocols. The aims of rehabilitation modalities varied and were grouped: "passive" movement to prevent joint contracture or stiffness, "active" or task-oriented movement to improve motor function, or "providing initial motor recovery". Surgical approach was described as either exploration of the brachial plexus (EBP) or nerve transfer without root exploration (NTwoRE). Technique was categorized into transfers and non-transfers.

RESULTS

Thirty-six full-text articles were included. Initiation of rehabilitation was 22.26 days post-surgery. Twenty-eight studies were EBP, and six were NTwoRE. Of studies classifiable by aims, nine were "passive", nine were "active", and five were "providing initial motor recovery". Only 27.7% of EBP studies mentioned active therapy, while 75.0% of NTwoRE studies mentioned active therapy. The average age of patients in the EBP procedure category was 7.70 months, and NTwoRE was 17.76 months. Within transfers, the spinal accessory to suprascapular group was more likely to describe an active shoulder exercise therapy, whereas contralateral C7 group was more likely to describe "initial motor recovery", especially through the use of electrostimulation. All articles on electrostimulation recommended 15-20-minute daily treatment.

CONCLUSION

Information on rehabilitation is limited post-nerve surgery in NBPP. However, when mentioned, the aims of these therapies vary with respect to surgical approach and technique. The type of therapy to employ may be a multifaceted decision, involving factors such as patient age, initial deformity, and goals of the care team.

Evaluating the feasibility of implementing the Sup-ER protocol for infants with brachial plexus birth injury

BACKGROUND

The Sup-ER protocol involves a repositioning program for infants with brachial plexus birth injury to position the shoulder in external rotation (ER) to address progressive loss in passive range of motion (PROM). The British Columbia Children's Hospital (BCCH) eligibility criteria for this protocol are infants aged 4-8 weeks with decreased shoulder ER PROM and/or Active Movement Scale (AMS) shoulder ER and/or supination scores ≤2. The resources needed to implement this protocol in large clinics have not been studied.

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the BCCH criteria that are used to identify appropriate candidates for the Sup-ER protocol.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify the percentage of infants who would have been recommended the Sup-ER protocol based on their PROM and AMS scores between 4 and 8 weeks of age.

METHODS

A sensitivity and specificity evaluation was used to describe the BCCH criteria's ability to identify infants in this historical cohort who went on to have incomplete shoulder function (ie, true positive) vs infants who had functional shoulder outcome at 9 months of age (ie, false positive).

RESULTS

At a mean of 5.8 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3, 6.3), 46 of the 87 (53%) infants satisfied the BCCH Sup-ER protocol criteria. Forty-four (51%) were female, half (n = 45) were left side affected, and 88% had upper plexus injury. The BCCH Sup-ER protocol criteria had sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 71% to identify infants with incomplete shoulder function. Removing the AMS supination ≤2 score criterion from the criteria improves the specificity to 84%, while sensitivity remains high (97%).

CONCLUSIONS

Modifying the BCCH criteria to all infants aged 4-8 weeks with AMS shoulder ER ≤2 and/or decreased shoulder ER PROM improves the precision of identifying infants who would benefit from the Sup-ER protocol.

Recent Advances in the Treatment of Brachial Plexus Birth Injury

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe methods of clinical evaluation for neurologic recovery in brachial plexus birth injury. 2. Understand the role of different diagnostic imaging modalities to evaluate the upper limb. 3. List nonsurgical strategies and surgical procedures to manage shoulder abnormality. 4. Explain the advantages and disadvantages of microsurgical nerve reconstruction and distal nerve transfers in brachial plexus birth injury. 5. Recognize the prevalence of pain in this population and the need for greater sensory outcomes evaluation.

SUMMARY

Brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) results from closed traction injury to the brachial plexus in the neck during an infant's vertex passage through the birth canal. Although spontaneous upper limb recovery occurs in most instances of BPBI, some infants do not demonstrate adequate motor recovery within an acceptable timeline and require surgical intervention to restore upper limb function. This article reviews major advances in the management of BPBI in the past decade that include improved understanding of shoulder pathology and its impact on observed motor recovery, novel surgical techniques, new insights in sensory function and pain, and global efforts to develop standardized outcomes assessment scales.

Neuroma-in-continuity: a review of pathophysiology and approach to the affected patient

A neuroma-in-continuity is a neuroma resulting from a nerve injury in which internal neuronal elements are partially disrupted (with a variable degree of disruption to the endoneurium and perineurium) while the epineurium typically remains intact. The portion of injured axons are misdirected and embedded in connective tissue, which may give rise to local neuroma pain and a distal nerve deficit. The lesion may result from a multitude of injury mechanisms, and clinical presentation is often variable depending on the nerve affected. Clinical, electrodiagnostic, and imaging examinations are helpful in assessing the extent and degree of the lesion. If no clear evidence of recovery is identified within 3-4 months post-injury, the patient may benefit from operative exploration. Surgical management options include neurolysis, neuroma resection, nerve grafting, and nerve transfer, or a combination of modalities. A primary consideration of surgery is the possibility of further downgrading nerve function in the pursuit of more, thereby highlighting the need to carefully weigh the advantages and disadvantages prior to surgical intervention. The objective of this review article is to describe the current understanding of the pathophysiology of neuroma-in-continuity lesions, and to review the approach to the affected patient including clinical evaluation, ancillary testing, and intraoperative assessment and treatment options.

Supraclavicular approach for neonatal brachial plexus palsy

Neonatal brachial plexus palsy describes injury to the brachial plexus in the perinatal period, resulting in motor and sensory deficits of the upper arm. Nerve reconstruction, including graft repair and nerve transfers, can be used to restore function in patients whose injury does not respond to conservative management. Despite the availability of these techniques, 30%-40% of children have lifelong disability, reflecting a 10-fold underutilization of surgery. Here, the authors demonstrate a supraclavicular approach for brachial plexus exploration, as well as a spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer for restoration of shoulder abduction and external rotation. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2022.10.FOCVID22109.

Neuropathic Pain Relief after Surgical Neurolysis in Patients with Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries: A Preliminary Report

Objective

To evaluate the usefulness of surgical neurolysis for neuropathic pain relief in patients with posttraumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI).

Methods

A prospective, longitudinal, nonrandomized, self-controlled before and after study was performed to evaluate the pain changes according to their intensity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the sensory recovery after surgery using the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scale for sensory recovery. To establish significant changes, a paired T-test was performed, and in order to determine the magnitude of these changes, an effect size was measured. α = 0.05.

Results

Ten patients were included with an average follow-up of 61.9 ± 53.62 months. The main mechanism of injury was vehicular trauma (70%). A significant decrease in pain after the surgical intervention was observed resulting from an average preoperative state according to VAS of 8.4 ± 1.58, to a postoperative state of 3.4 ± 3.27 (59.52%, p = 0.005, Δ = 1.572), added to a mean sensory improvement (25%) from 2.8 ± 1.62 to 3.5 ± 0.97 after surgery according to BMRC, without statistically significant changes (p=0.062), showing a moderate effect size (Δ = 0.413). Almost all patients showed improvement in the continuous and paroxysmal pattern of pain. No postoperative complications were observed. Discussion. These results suggest that in cases of BPI that originates from a compressive syndrome secondary to the posttraumatic fibrosis that surrounds the nerve structures causing strangulation and inducing hypernociception, the use of surgical neurolysis is an appropriate alternative for patients with medically refractory neuropathic pain.

Brachial Plexus Birth Injury: Trends in Early Surgical Intervention over the Last Three Decades

Early surgical management of brachial plexus birth injury has advanced owing to targeted surgical techniques and increases in specialty-centers and multi-institutional collaboration. This study seeks to determine trends in the early surgical management of BPBI over the last 30 years.

Methods

A systematic review was performed through MEDLINE (PubMed) identifying studies limited to the early surgical management of BPBI from 1990 to current. Patients treated after 1 year of age (ie, tendon transfers and secondary reconstructive efforts) were excluded. Diagnostic tests, age of intervention, surgical treatment modalities, and outcome scoring systems were extrapolated and compared so as to determine trends in management over time.

Results

Seventeen studies met criteria, summating a total of 883 patients. The most commonly reported physical examination classifications were the Mallet and AMS scoring systems. Most patients underwent neuroma excision and sural nerve autografting (n = 618, 70%) when compared with primary nerve transfers (148, 16.8%), primary nerve transfer with autografting combinations (59, 6.7%), or neurolysis alone (58, 6.6%). There was no significant change in the proportion of patients treated with sural nerve grafting, combination graft and transfer procedures, or isolated neurolysis over time. However, there has been a significant increase in the proportion of patients treated with primary nerve transfer procedures (τ _b = 0.668, P < 0.01) over time.

Conclusion

Although neuroma excision and sural nerve autografting has been the historic gold-standard treatment for brachial plexus birth injury, peripheral nerve transfers have become increasingly utilized for surgical management.

Brachial Plexus Birth Injuries

Brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBIs) are typically traction type injuries to the newborn that occur during the delivery process. Although the incidence of these injuries has overall decreased from 1.5 to around 0.9 per 1000 live births in the United States over the past 2 decades, these injuries remain common, with incidence holding fairly steady from 2008 to 2014. Shoulder dystocia is the strongest identified risk factor, imparting a 100-fold greater risk. The newborn's shoulder is caught behind the mother's pubic bone, and traction performed on the child during delivery results in injury to the brachial plexus. Other risk factors associated with BPBI include macrosomia (birthweight > 4.5 kg), heavy for gestational age infants, birth hypoxia, gestational diabetes, and forceps or vacuum-assisted delivery. Breech presentation has also been described as a risk factor in the past, but there have been more recent data that challenge this association.

Surgical Innovations to Restore Function in Pediatric Peripheral Nerve Conditions

Peripheral nerve injuries in children can result in devastating lifelong deficits. Because of the time-sensitive nature of muscle viability and the limited speed of nerve regeneration, early recognition and treatment of nerve injuries are essential to restore function. Innovative surgical techniques have been developed to combat the regenerative length and speed; these include nerve transfers. Nerve transfers involve transferring a healthy, expendable donor nerve to an injured nerve to restore movement and sensation. Nerve transfers are frequently used to treat children affected by conditions, including UE trauma, brachial plexus birth injury, and acute flaccid myelitis. Pediatricians play an important role in the outcomes of children with these conditions through early diagnosis and timely referrals. With this review, we aim to provide awareness of state-of-the-art surgical treatment options that significantly improve the function of children with traumatic nerve injuries, brachial plexus birth injury, and acute flaccid myelitis.

Timing of Nerve Recovery After Nerve Grafting in Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Palsy Patients With Isolated Upper Trunk Neuromas

BACKGROUND

The timing of nerve recovery after nerve grafting in obstetrical brachial plexus palsy patients has not been well reported. One prior study reported a return to baseline function at 3 to 6 months postoperatively. However, there is a paucity of studies to corroborate this timing, and there have been no studies delineating the timeline to obtain clinically meaningful function.

METHODS

OBPP patients with upper trunk neuromas-in-continuity who were treated with resection and sural nerve grafting at a single institution were studied. Time to return to baseline function was assessed by Active Movement Scale (AMS) scores preoperatively and postoperatively. Time to clinically meaningful function, defined as an AMS score of ≥6, was also assessed.

RESULTS

Eleven patients with isolated upper trunk neuromas-in-continuity underwent excision and reversed sural nerve grafting. Three of 11 patients also underwent spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfers. Average age at surgery was 9.8 ± 1.9 months. One patient did not have follow-up data and was excluded. Average follow-up was 37.1 ± 16.8 months. Average return to baseline AMS score was approximately 4 to 8 months for shoulder abduction, shoulder flexion, shoulder external rotation, elbow flexion, and forearm supination. Clinically meaningful function was obtained in most patients between 9 and 15 months. The remaining patients who did not achieve clinically meaningful function had all obtained scores of 5, which reflects less than one half normal range of motion against gravity.

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve recovery after surgical intervention in OBPP patients who undergo resection of an upper trunk neuroma-in-continuity and nerve grafting is more rapid than in adults but longer than previously reported in OBPP literature. This study provides an important data point in delineating the timeline of nerve recovery.

Long-Term Hand Function Outcomes of the Surgical Management of Complete Brachial Plexus Birth Injury

PURPOSE

Hand function outcomes of primary nerve reconstruction for total brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) are confounded by nerve roots left in continuity, inclusion of secondary procedures, and no assessment of the ability to perform activities of daily living. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term hand function outcomes in a cohort of patients with a complete BPBI who had no nerve root in continuity prior to primary nerve reconstruction targeting the lower trunk.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective case series of complete BPBI included patients who underwent primary nerve reconstruction. The outcomes were assessed using the active movement scale (AMS) and brachial plexus outcome measure preoperatively and at the age of 4 and 8 years.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with a complete BPBI, of whom 82% (41/50) had an avulsion of C8-T1, underwent primary nerve reconstruction at a mean age of 4.1 months. Compared with the preoperative AMS scores, a statistically significant increase of AMS scores was observed at 4 and 8 years of age for all movements except forearm pronation. Between 4 and 8 years of age, there was a statistically significant improvement of external rotation of the shoulder and elbow flexion as well as diminution of thumb flexion. In the brachial plexus outcome measure assessment, there were 83% (24/29) at 4 years and 81% (21/26) at 8 years who had sufficient functional movement to perform wrist, finger, and thumb activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional hand outcome was restored to sufficiently perform bimanual activity tasks in 81% (21/26) of patients with a complete BPBI at 8 years of age. This affirmed that primary nerve reconstruction reinnervating the lower trunk can result in a functional extremity.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Long Thoracic Nerve Transfer for Children With Brachial Plexus Injuries

INTRODUCTION

The transfer of intraplexal and extraplexal nerves for restoration of function in children with traumatic and birth brachial plexus palsies has become well accepted. Little has been written about using the long thoracic nerve (LTN) as a donor in reanimation of the upper extremity. The authors present a case series of nerve transfers using the LTN as a donor in brachial plexus injury.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed over a 10-year period at a single institution. The primary outcome measure was the active movement scale.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were included in the study: 10 birth injury patients and 4 blunt trauma patients. Average follow-up time was 21.3 and 10.75 months, respectively. The best outcomes were seen when the LTN was used for reinnervation of the obturator nerve in free functioning muscle transfers. The next most successful recipients were the musculocutaneous and axillary nerves. Outcomes were poor in transfers to the posterior interosseous fascicles of the radial nerve and the radial nerve branches to the triceps.

DISCUSSION

The LTN may be a potential nerve donor for musculocutaneous or axillary nerve reinnervation in patients with brachial plexus injuries when other donors are not available during a primary plexus reconstruction. However, the best use may be for delayed neurotization of a free functioning muscle transfer after the initial plexus reconstruction has failed and no other donors are available.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-therapeutic study.

Clinical outcomes report in different brachial plexus injury surgeries: a systematic review

Brachial plexus injury is a lesion that results in loss of function of the arm, and there are multiple ways of surgically approaching its treatment. Controlled trials that compare all surgical repair strategies and their clinical outcomes have not been performed. A systematic review was conducted to identify all articles that reported clinical outcomes in different surgeries (nerve transfer, nerve graft, neurolysis, end-to-end, multiple interventions, and others). Advanced search in PubMed was performed using the Mesh terms "brachial plexus injury" as the main topic and "surgery" as a subtopic, obtaining a total of 2153 articles. The clinical data for eligibility extraction was focused on collecting motor, sensory, pain, and functional recovery. A statistical analysis was performed to find the superior surgical techniques in terms of motor recovery, through the assessment of heterogeneity between groups, and of relationships between surgery and motor recovery. The frequency and the manner in which clinical outcomes are recording were described. The differences that correspond to the demographics and procedural factors were not statistically significant among groups (p > 0.05). Neurolysis showed the highest proportion of motor recovery (85.18%), with significant results between preoperative and post-operative motor assessment (p = 0.028). The proportion of motor recovery in each group according to the surgical approach differed significantly (X² = 82.495, p = 0.0001). The motor outcome was the most reported clinical outcome (97.56%), whereas the other clinical outcomes were reported in less than 15% of the included articles. Unexpectedly, neurolysis, a technique displaced by new surgical alternatives such as nerve transfer/graft, demonstrated the highest proportion of motor recovery. Clinical outcomes such as pain, sensory, and functional recovery were infrequently reported. These results introduce the need to re-evaluate neurolysis through comparative clinical trials, as well as to standardize the way in which clinical outcomes are reported.

Brachial Plexus Birth Injuries: A Critical Analysis Review

»

The incidence of brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) in the United States is declining and now occurs in <1 per 1,000 births.

»

The gold standard for predicting the need for early intervention remains serial examination.

»

Early treatment of BPBI with reconstructive surgery requires the ability to perform both interposition nerve grafting and nerve transfers.

»

Given the heterogeneity of lesions, the evidence is largely limited to retrospective comparative studies and case series.

Relocating the C5 nerve stump in C5 nerve grafting to prevent iatrogenic phrenic nerve injury

BACKGROUND

Exploration and grafting of the brachial plexus remains the gold standard for post-ganglionic brachial plexus injuries that present within an acceptable time frame from injury. The most common nerves available for grafting include C5 and C6. During the surgical exposure of C5 and C6, the phrenic nerve is anatomically anterior to the cervical spinal nerves, making it vulnerable to injury while performing the dissection and nerve stump to graft coaptation. We describe a novel technique that protects the phrenic nerve from injury during supraclavicular brachial plexus exposure and grafting of C5 or upper trunk ruptures or neuromas in-continuity.

METHODS

A 4-step technique is illustrated: (1) The normal anatomic relationships of the phrenic nerve anterior to C5 is displayed in the face of the traumatic scarring. (2) The C5 spinal nerve stump is then transposed from its anatomic position posterior to the phrenic nerve to an anterior position. (3) The C5 stump is then moved medially for retrograde neurolysis of C5 from its phrenic nerve contribution. The graft coaptation to C5 is performed in this medial position, which minimizes retraction of the phrenic nerve. (4) The normal anatomic relationship of the phrenic nerve and the C5 nerve graft is restored.

RESULTS

We have been routinely relocating the C5 spinal nerve stump around the phrenic nerve for the past 10 years. We have experienced no adverse respiratory events.

CONCLUSION

This technique facilitates surgical exposure and prevents iatrogenic injury on the phrenic nerve during nerve reconstruction.

Evidence that nerve surgery improves functional outcome for obstetric brachial plexus injury

The majority of children with obstetric brachial plexus injury show some degree of spontaneous recovery. This review explores the available evidence for the use surgical brachial plexus repair to improve outcome. So far, no randomized trial has been performed to evaluate the usefulness of nerve repair. The evidence level of studies comparing surgical treatment with non-surgical treatment is Level IV at best. The studies on natural history that are used for comparison with surgical series are also, unfortunately, of too low quality. Among experts, however, the general agreement is that nerve reconstruction is indicated when spontaneous recovery is absent or severely delayed at specific time points. A major obstacle in comparing or pooling obstetric brachial plexus injury patient series, either surgical or non-surgical, is the use of many different outcome measures. A requirement for multicentre studies is consensus on how to assess and report outcome, both concerning motor performance and functional evaluation.

Morbidity of Nerve Transfers for Brachial Plexus Birth Injury: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this article is to systematically review the peer-reviewed literature on the morbidity of nerve transfers performed in patients with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI). Nerve transfers for restoration of function in patients with BPBI that fail nonoperative management are increasing in popularity. However, relatively little attention has been paid to the morbidity of these transfers in the growing patient. The authors systematically review the current literature regarding donor site morbidity following nerve transfer for BPBI.

METHODS

A systematic review of the Medline and EMBASE databases was conducted through February 2020. Primary research articles written in English and reporting donor site morbidity after nerve transfer for BPBI were included for review.

RESULTS

Thirty-six articles met inclusion criteria, all of which were retrospective reviews or case reports. There was great heterogeneity in outcomes assessed. With 5 year or less follow-up, all transfers were relatively well tolerated with the exception of the hypoglossal nerve transfer.

CONCLUSION

Nerve transfers are a well-recognized treatment strategy for patients with BPBI and have an acceptable risk profile in the short term. Full hypoglossal nerve transfers for BPBI are of historical interest. Donor site morbidity is grossly underreported. This review highlights the need for more objective and systematic reporting of donor site outcomes, and the need for longer term follow-up in these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review. Level III-therapeutic.

Outcomes of Late Microsurgical Nerve Reconstruction for Brachial Plexus Birth Injury

PURPOSE

Microsurgical nerve reconstruction has been advocated between 3 and 9 months of life in select patients with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI), yet some patients undergo indicated surgery after this time frame. Outcomes in these older patients remain poorly characterized. We analyzed outcomes of nerve reconstruction performed after 9 months of age and hypothesized that (1) Active Movement Scale (AMS) scores improve after surgery, and (2) there are no differences in AMS scores between patients undergoing nerve transfers versus those undergoing nerve grafting.

METHODS

From 2000 to 2014, 750 patients at 6 U.S. centers were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter database. We included patients treated with nerve reconstruction after 9 months of age with minimum 12 months' follow-up. Patients were evaluated using AMS scores. To focus on the results of microsurgery, only outcomes prior to secondary surgery were analyzed. We analyzed baseline variables using bivariate statistics and change in AMS scores over time and across treatment groups using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

We identified 32 patients (63% female) with median follow-up of 29.8 months. Median age at microsurgery was 11.2 months. Twenty-five (78%) had an upper trunk injury. Compared with before surgery, total AMS scores improved modestly at 1 year and 2 or more years follow-up. At 1 year follow-up, AMS scores improved for shoulder function (abduction, external rotation) and elbow flexion. Between-group comparisons found no differences in total AMS scores or AMS subscales between graft and transfer groups at 1 year or 2 or more years after surgery, so we cannot recommend one strategy over the other based on our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, nerve reconstruction in patients with BPBI after 9 months of age resulted in improved function over time. There was no difference in outcomes between nerve transfer and nerve graft groups and 1 or 2 or more years follow-up.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Reconstruction of the Suprascapular Nerve in Brachial Plexus Birth Injury: A Comparison of Nerve Grafting and Nerve Transfers

BACKGROUND

Shoulder external rotation recovery in brachial plexus birth injury is often limited. Nerve grafting to the suprascapular nerve and transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve are commonly performed to restore shoulder external rotation, but the optimal surgical technique has not been clearly demonstrated. We investigated whether there was a difference between nerve grafting and nerve transfer in terms of shoulder external rotation recovery or secondary shoulder procedures.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 145 infants with brachial plexus birth injury who underwent reconstruction with nerve grafting to the suprascapular nerve (n = 59) or spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer (n = 86) with a minimum follow-up of 18 months (median, 25.7 months [interquartile range, 22.0, 31.2 months]). The primary outcome was the Active Movement Scale (AMS) score for shoulder external rotation at 18 to 36 months. The secondary outcome was secondary shoulder surgery. Two-sample Wilcoxon and t tests were used to analyze continuous variables, and the Fisher exact test was used to analyze categorical variables. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the cumulative risk of subsequent shoulder procedures, and the proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

The grafting and transfer groups were similar in Narakas type, preoperative AMS scores, and shoulder subluxation. The mean postoperative shoulder external rotation AMS scores were 2.70 in the grafting group and 3.21 in the transfer group, with no difference in shoulder external rotation recovery between the groups (difference, 0.51 [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.31 to 1.33]). A greater proportion of the transfer group (24%) achieved an AMS score of >5 for shoulder external rotation compared with the grafting group (5%) (odds ratio, 5.9 [95% CI, 1.3 to 27.4]). Forty percent of the transfer group underwent a secondary shoulder surgical procedure compared with 53% of the grafting group; this was a significantly lower subsequent surgery rate (HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.95]).

CONCLUSIONS

Shoulder external rotation recovery in brachial plexus birth injury remains disappointing regardless of surgical technique, with a mean postoperative AMS score of 3, 17% of infants achieving an AMS score of >5, and a high frequency of secondary shoulder procedures in this study. Spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfers were associated with a higher proportion of infants achieving functional shoulder external rotation (AMS score of >5) and fewer secondary shoulder procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Microsurgery for Brachial Plexus Injury Before Versus After 6 Months of Age: Results of the Multicenter Treatment and Outcomes of Brachial Plexus Injury (TOBI) Study

BACKGROUND

Infants with more severe brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) benefit from primary nerve surgery to improve function. The timing of the surgery, however, is controversial. The Treatment and Outcomes of Brachial Plexus Injury (TOBI) study is a multicenter prospective study with the primary aim of determining the optimal timing of this surgical intervention. This study compared outcomes evaluated 18 to 36 months after "early" microsurgery (at <6 months of age) with the outcomes of "late" microsurgery (at >6 months of age).

METHODS

Of 216 patients who had undergone microsurgery, 118 were eligible for inclusion because they had had a nerve graft and/or transfer followed by at least 1 physical examination during the 18 to 36-month interval after the microsurgery but before any secondary surgery. Patients were grouped according to whether the surgery had been performed before or after 6 months of age. Postoperative outcomes were measured using the total Active Movement Scale (AMS) score as well as the change in the AMS score. To address hand reinnervation, we calculated a hand function subscore from the AMS hand items and repeated the analysis only for the subjects with a Narakas grade of 3 or 4. Our hypothesis was that microsurgery done before 6 months of age would lead to better clinical outcomes than microsurgery performed after 6 months of age.

RESULTS

Eighty subjects (68%) had early surgery (at a mean age of 4.2 months), and 38 (32%) had late surgery (at a mean age of 10.7 months and a maximum age of 22.0 months). Infants who underwent early surgery presented earlier in life, had more severe injuries at baseline, and had a significantly lower postoperative AMS scores in the unadjusted analysis. However, when we controlled for the severity of the injury, the difference in the AMS scores between the early and late surgery groups was not significant. Similarly, when we restricted our multivariable analysis to patients with a Narakas grade-3 or 4 injury, there was no significant difference in the postoperative AMS hand subscore between the early and late groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that surgery earlier in infancy (at a mean age of 4.2 months) does not lead to better postoperative outcomes of BPBI nerve surgery than when the surgery is performed later in infancy (mean age of 10.7 months).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outcomes of Spinal Accessory-to-Suprascapular Nerve Transfers for Brachial Plexus Birth Injury

PURPOSE

The results of a spinal accessory nerve-to-suprascapular (SAN-SSN) nerve transfer for brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBIs) have thus far been presented only in limited case series. Our study evaluates the recovery of shoulder function of patients who underwent an SAN-SSN for BPBI as an isolated procedure or as part of a multinerve reconstruction (MNR) surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients at a single institution who underwent an SAN-SSN after BPBI. Inclusion criteria were patients with both preoperative and a minimum 12-months postoperative active movement scale (AMS) scores. Patients for whom the primary surgery involved tendon transfers were excluded. The primary outcome measures were AMS scores for shoulder abduction, forward flexion, and external rotation and secondary outcomes included the need for further shoulder surgery to improve function.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients met the inclusion criteria. Forty-three patients (58.9%) obtained functional shoulder motion (AMS ≥ 6) of at least 1 of 3 planes (abduction/flexion/external rotation) following surgery, with 13 patients (17.8%) achieving full recovery of 1 of these shoulder motions against gravity (AMS = 7). Fifty-six patients (76.7%) did not undergo subsequent tendon transfers or corrective osteotomies to augment shoulder function. The MNR procedures were performed in 46 patients (63%), of whom 45.7% gained a functional recovery. In 27 patients for whom SAN-SSN nerve transfer was conducted in isolation, 81.5% gained functional shoulder motion. However, isolated SAN-SSNs were conducted at a later age than MNR procedures (13.2 vs 4.8 months) and had higher preoperative AMS scores. The anterior and posterior approaches for SAN-SSN were both found to be effective when used for SAN-SSN in BPBI. When the follow-up duration cutoff was set to 3 years, the outcomes were found to be superior.

CONCLUSIONS

In 76.7% of the patients, SAN-SSN was able to recover function that was sufficient to prevent tendon transfers and corrective osteotomies. A cutoff of 3 postoperative years should be used as a benchmark for analyzing the results of this procedure.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Intraoperative Nerve Stimulation During Brachial Plexus Surgery: Comparison Between a Totally Disposable Nerve Stimulator and Nerve Stimulator Normally Used for Nerve Blocks

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative nerve stimulation is done routinely in brachial plexus and peripheral nerve surgery as well as in selective neurectomy in spastic patients.

OBJECTIVE

The current study compares the use of 2 different devices for nerve stimulation: a totally disposable nerve stimulator and a nerve stimulator used for nerve blocks by anesthetists.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent brachial plexus surgery: In 30 patients, we used the totally disposable nerve stimulator (group 1) and in another 30 patients, we used the anesthesia device (group 2). The cost of disposable materials used for nerve stimulation was calculated in each group. The same surgeon performed all operations, and he was asked to give his subjective opinion regarding the convenience and ease of use of the device in each group.

RESULTS

The main advantages of the totally disposable device are its placement totally within the sterile field, and it is operated by the surgeon without the need to communicate with the anesthetist. However, the totally disposable device had several major disadvantages when compared to the anesthesia device. Firstly, the disposable stimulator can only deliver 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mA stimuli, while the anesthesia device can deliver stimuli of 0.1 to 5 mA (in 0.1 mA increments). Secondly, the disposable stimulator frequently fails to operate during surgery, and this is not experienced with the anesthesia device. Finally, the cost of disposables is less using the anesthesia device.

CONCLUSION

Our center has stopped using the disposable nerve stimulator in favour for the anesthesia device.

Scarring of the C8-T1 roots with partial avulsion in situ in total obstetric brachial plexus palsy

Background

Primary exploration of the brachial plexus in infants with obstetric palsy may reveal scarring of the lower roots with evidence of partial avulsion-in-situ. As we have been treating this lesion by neurolysis only, we aimed to investigate the recovery of hand function following such approach.

Methods

A series of 14 cases of total obstetric palsy with with evidence of partial avulsion-in-situ of the lower roots were included. All lesions were treated by neurolysis only (with no neurotization of the lower roots). Management of the injured upper roots was done by neurotization. Recovery was assessed as per our motor grading system.

Results

After a minimum follow-up of 4 years, hand functional recovery was considered good in 7 patients and excellent in the remaining 7 patients.

Conclusions

We highlight the scarring of lower roots with evidence of partial avulsion-in situ in obstetric palsy. We also document that neurolysis is an acceptable approach to such lesions.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

The outcome of primary brachial plexus reconstruction in extended Erb's obstetric palsy when only one root is available for intraplexus neurotization

Background

A recent review by the International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand showed no studies comparing the results of nerve grafting to distal nerve transfer for primary reconstruction of the brachial plexus in infants with obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBBP). The aim of this retrospective study is to compare two surgical reconstructive strategies in primary reconstruction of the brachial plexus in extended Erb’s obstetric palsy with double root avulsion: one with and one without distal nerve transfer for elbow flexion.

Methods

Two groups of infants with extended Erb’s palsy and double root avulsion were included in the study. Group I (n = 29) underwent reconstruction of the brachial plexus without distal nerve transfer. In group II (n = 26), the reconstruction included a distal nerve transfer for elbow flexion.

Results

Both groups had an excellent (over 96%) satisfactory outcome for elbow flexion. Group II has a significantly better outcome (P < 0.05) of shoulder abduction and wrist extension than group I.

Conclusions

The use of a distant nerve transfer for bicep reconstruction in extended Erb’s obstetric palsy with double root avulsion gives a better outcome for shoulder abduction and wrist extension; and this seems to be related to the availability of more cable grafts to reconstruct the posterior division of the upper trunk and the middle trunk.

Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study

The components of shoulder and elbow movements as goals of primary reconstructive operation in obstetric brachial plexus lesions

Most of the cases of obstetric brachial plexus lesions (OBPL) show satisfactory improvement with conservative management, but in about 25% some surgical treatment is indicated. The present paper analyzes the effects of primary reconstructive surgeries in aspect of achieving delineated intraoperatively goals. Children operated before the age of 18 months with follow-up period longer than 1 year were selected. Therapeutic goals established during the operation were identified by analysis of initial clinical status and operative protocols. The elementary movement components in shoulder and elbow joints were classified by assessing range of motion, score in Active Movement Scale and modified British Medical Research Council scale of muscle strength. The effect was considered satisfactory when some antigravity movement was possible, and good when strength exceeded M3 or antigravity movement exceeded half of range of passive movement. In 13 of 19 patients most of established goals were achieved at good level, in 2 at satisfactory level. Remaining 4 patients showed improvement only in some aspects of extremity function. In 2 patients improvement in some movements was accompanied by worsening of other movements. The analysis of results separated into individual components of movements showed that goals were achieved in most of the cases, simultaneously clearly indicating which damaged structures failed to provide satisfactory function despite being addressed intraoperatively. The good results were obtained mainly by regeneration through grafts implanted after resection of neuroma in continuity, which proves that this technique is safe in spite of unavoidable temporary regression of function postoperatively.

Obstetrical brachial plexus injury (OBPI): Canada's national clinical practice guideline

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to establish an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the primary management of obstetrical brachial plexus injury (OBPI). This clinical practice guideline addresses 4 existing gaps: (1) historic poor use of evidence, (2) timing of referral to multidisciplinary care, (3) Indications and timing of operative nerve repair and (4) distribution of expertise.

SETTING

The guideline is intended for all healthcare providers treating infants and children, and all specialists treating upper extremity injuries.

PARTICIPANTS

The evidence interpretation and recommendation consensus team (Canadian OBPI Working Group) was composed of clinicians representing each of Canada's 10 multidisciplinary centres.

OUTCOME MEASURES

An electronic modified Delphi approach was used for consensus, with agreement criteria defined a priori. Quality indicators for referral to a multidisciplinary centre were established by consensus. An original meta-analysis of primary nerve repair and review of Canadian epidemiology and burden were previously completed.

RESULTS

7 recommendations address clinical gaps and guide identification, referral, treatment and outcome assessment: (1) physically examine for OBPI in newborns with arm asymmetry or risk factors; (2) refer newborns with OBPI to a multidisciplinary centre by 1 month; (3) provide pregnancy/birth history and physical examination findings at birth; (4) multidisciplinary centres should include a therapist and peripheral nerve surgeon experienced with OBPI; (5) physical therapy should be advised by a multidisciplinary team; (6) microsurgical nerve repair is indicated in root avulsion and other OBPI meeting centre operative criteria; (7) the common data set includes the Narakas classification, limb length, Active Movement Scale (AMS) and Brachial Plexus Outcome Measure (BPOM) 2 years after birth/surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The process established a new network of opinion leaders and researchers for further guideline development and multicentre research. A structured referral form is available for primary care, including referral recommendations.

The natural history and management of brachial plexus birth palsy

Brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP) is an upper extremity paralysis that occurs due to traction injury of the brachial plexus during childbirth. Approximately 20 % of children with brachial plexus birth palsy will have residual neurologic deficits. These permanent and significant impacts on upper limb function continue to spur interest in optimizing the management of a problem with a highly variable natural history. BPBP is generally diagnosed on clinical examination and does not typically require cross-sectional imaging. Physical examination is also the best modality to determine candidates for microsurgical reconstruction of the brachial plexus. The key finding on physical examination that determines need for microsurgery is recovery of antigravity elbow flexion by 3-6 months of age. When indicated, both microsurgery and secondary shoulder and elbow procedures are effective and can substantially improve functional outcomes. These procedures include nerve transfers and nerve grafting in infants and secondary procedures in children, such as botulinum toxin injection, shoulder tendon transfers, and humeral derotational osteotomy.

Shoulder Function Following Late Neurolysis and Bypass Grafting for Upper Brachial Plexus Birth Injuries

Eleven children ranging in age from 9 to 21 months underwent late nerve reconstruction for persistent shoulder paralysis following an upper brachial plexus birth injury. Only neurolysis was performed in three patients. Neurolysis and nerve grafting bypassing the neuroma with proximal and distal end-to-side repairs was performed in the other eight. All patients were followed for 2 or more years. Two patients underwent a secondary procedure before their final follow-up evaluation. All infants demonstrated significant improvement when assessed by a modified Gilbert shoulder motion scale.

Nerve Transfers in Birth Related Brachial Plexus Injuries: Where Do We Stand?

This article reviews the assessment and management of obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. The potential role of distal nerve transfers in the treatment of infants with Erb's palsy is discussed. Current evidence for motor outcomes after traditional reconstruction via interpositional nerve grafting and extraplexal nerve transfers is reviewed and compared with the recent literature on intraplexal distal nerve transfers in obstetrical brachial plexus injury.

Obstetric brachial plexus palsy: reviewing the literature comparing the results of primary versus secondary surgery

Obstetric brachial plexus injuries (OBPP) are a relatively common stretch injury of the brachial plexus that occurs during delivery. Roughly 30 % of patients will not recover completely and will need a surgical repair. Two main treatment strategies have been used: primary surgery, consisting in exploring and reconstructing the affected portions of the brachial plexus within the first few months of the patient's life, and secondary procedures that include tendon or muscle transfers, osteotomies, and other orthopedic techniques. Secondary procedures can be done as the only surgical treatment of OBPP or after primary surgery, in order to minimize any residual deficits. Two things are crucial to achieving a good outcome: (1) the appropriate selection of patients, to separate those who will spontaneously recover from those who will recover only partially or not at all; and (2) a good surgical technique. The objective of the present review is to assess the published literature concerning certain controversial issues in OBPP, especially in terms of the true current state of primary and secondary procedures, their results, and the respective roles each plays in modern-day treatment of this complex pathology. Considerable published evidence compiled over decades of surgical experience favors primary nerve surgery as the initial therapeutic step in patients who do not recover spontaneously, followed by secondary surgeries for further functional improvement. As described in this review, the results of such treatment can greatly ameliorate function in affected limbs. For best results, multi-disciplinary teams should treat these patients.

International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand Committee report: the role of nerve transfers in the treatment of neonatal brachial plexus palsy

Nerve transfers have gained popularity in the treatment of adult brachial plexus palsy; however, their role in the treatment of neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) remains unclear. Brachial plexus palsies in infants differ greatly from those in adults in the patterns of injury, potential for recovery, and influences of growth and development. This International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand committee report on NBPP is based upon review of the current literature. We found no direct comparisons of nerve grafting to nerve transfer for primary reconstruction of NBPP. Although the results contained in individual reports that use each strategy for treatment of Erb palsy are similar, comparison of nerve transfer to nerve grafting is limited by inconsistencies in outcomes reported, by multiple confounding factors, and by small numbers of patients. Although the role of nerve transfers for primary reconstruction remains to be defined, nerve transfers have been found to be effective and useful in specific clinical circumstances including late presentation, isolated deficits, failed primary reconstruction, and multiple nerve root avulsions. In the case of NBPP more severe than Erb palsy, nerve transfers alone are inadequate to address all of the deficits and should only be considered as adjuncts if maximal re-innervation is to be achieved. Surgeons who commit to care of infants with NBPP need to avoid an over-reliance on nerve transfers and should also have the capability and inclination for brachial plexus exploration and nerve graft reconstruction.

Neurolysis alone as the treatment for neuroma-in-continuity with more than 50% conduction in infants with upper trunk brachial plexus birth palsy

OBJECT

The debate addressed in this article is that of surgical treatment methods for a neuroma-in-continuity. The authors of this study chose to test the hypothesis that more severe nerve injuries, as distinguished by < 50% conduction across a neuroma-in-continuity, could be treated with neuroma resection and grafting, whereas less severe nerve injuries, with > 50% conduction across the neuroma, could be treated with neurolysis alone.

METHODS

The goal of this study was to compare preoperative and postoperative Active Movement Scale (AMS) scores in children with upper trunk brachial plexus birth injuries treated with neurolysis alone if the neuroma's conductivity was > 50% on intraoperative nerve testing. Seventeen patients (7 male, 10 female) met the criteria for inclusion in this study. Surgery was done when the patients were an average of 10 months old (range 6-19 months). The authors analyzed AMS scores from the preoperative assessment, 1-year postoperative follow-up visit, and subsequent follow-up assessment as close to 3 years after surgery as possible (referred to in this paper as > 2-year postoperative scores).

RESULTS

Comparison of preoperative and 1-year follow-up data showed significant improvement in shoulder abduction, flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation; elbow flexion and supination; and wrist extension. Comparison of preoperative findings and results of assessment at > 2-year follow-up showed significant improvement in shoulder abduction, flexion, external rotation; and elbow flexion and supination. At final follow-up, useful function (AMS score of 6 or 7) was achieved for elbow flexion in 14 of 16 patients, shoulder flexion in 11 of 15 patients, shoulder abduction in 11 of 16 patients, and shoulder external rotation in 5 of 15 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This report indicates that there is a subgroup of patients who can benefit clinically, with functional improvement of shoulder and elbow function, from treatment with neurolysis alone for upper trunk lesions demonstrating more than 50% conduction across the neuroma on intraoperative nerve testing. Patients with less than 50% conduction, indicating more severe disease, are treated with nerve resection and grafting in the authors' treatment algorithm.

The evidence for nerve repair in obstetric brachial plexus palsy revisited

Strong scientific validation for nerve reconstructive surgery in infants with Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy is lacking, as no randomized trial comparing surgical reconstruction versus conservative treatment has been performed. A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies that compare nerve reconstruction to conservative treatment, including neurolysis. Nine papers were identified that directly compared the two treatment modalities. Eight of these were classified as level 4 evidence and one as level 5 evidence. All nine papers were evaluated in detail to describe strong and weak points in the methodology, and the outcomes from all studies were presented. Pooling of data was not possible due to differences in patient selection for surgery and outcome measures. The general consensus is that nerve reconstruction is indicated when the result of nerve surgery is assumedly better than the expected natural recovery, when spontaneous recovery is absent or severely delayed. The papers differed in methodology on how the cut-off point to select infants for nerve reconstructive surgical therapy should be determined. The justification for nerve reconstruction is further discussed.

Intraneural OX7-saporin for neuroma-in-continuity in a rat model

We employed 54 rats to devise a model of neuroma-in-continuity and explore the effect of the immunotoxin OX7-saporin on the neuroma. The left common peroneal, tibial or sciatic nerves were crushed by one 10-s application of a micro-artery forceps. At 3 and 6 weeks, the nerve was cut distal to the site of nerve crush, and retrograde fluorescent labeling was done. Pressure microinjection of 2 μl of natural saline or 2 μl of the immunotoxin conjugate OX7-saporin was done at the nerve stump 2 days later. Sacrifice was done after 3 weeks. In all control and saline-injection nerve specimens, gross observation and histology showed a neuroma-in-continuity. In 19 of the 24 OX7-saporin nerve specimens, gross observation showed a narrowed area at the site of nerve crush. Histology showed inhibition of neuroma-in-continuity formation. Fluorescent microscopy showed ablation of the labeled neurons in the dorsal root ganglia corresponding to the OX7-saporin subgroups.

Diagnosis of brachial and lumbosacral plexus lesions

To most doctors, brachial and lumbosacral plexopathies are known as difficult disorders, because of their complicated anatomy and relatively rare occurrence. Both the brachial, lumbar, and sacral plexuses are extensive PNS structures stretching from the neck to axillary region and running in the paraspinal lumbar and pelvic region, containing 100000-200000 axons with 12-15 major terminal branches supplying almost 50 muscles in each limb. The most difficult part in diagnosing a plexopathy is probably that it requires an adequate amount of clinical suspicion combined with a thorough anatomical knowledge of the PNS and a meticulous clinical examination. Once a set of symptoms is recognized as a plexopathy the patients' history and course of the disorder will often greatly limit the differential diagnosis. The most common cause of brachial plexopathy is probably neuralgic amyotrophy and the most common cause of lumbosacral plexopathy is diabetic amyotrophy. Traumatic and malignant lesions are fortunately rarer but just as devastating. This chapter provides an overview of both common and rarer brachial and lumbosacral plexus disorders, focusing on clinical examination, the use of additional investigative techniques, prognosis, and treatment.

Obstetric brachial plexus injury: expectations before and satisfaction three months after secondary surgery on the shoulder

Introduction

Children affected by obstetrical brachial plexus injury frequently have residual externalrotation weakness in the shoulder. Secondary surgical procedures are available for improvement. The aim ofthis study was to describe and compare children's and parents’ expectations, the importance of selectedarm/hand function, and performance of activities before and satisfaction after surgical correction of rotationdeformity in the shoulder.

Method

In the Department of Hand Surgery, Södersjukhuset Sweden, all patients ≥4-year-olds (n = 42)affected by obstetrical plexus injury who underwent secondary surgery to release rotation contracture of the shoulder were included in this study between November 2001 and May 2006. A disease-specific questionnaire was developed and used.

Results

The expectations before surgery were that the majority of the activities and functions would be improved. There were some differences between the adolescents’ and their parents’ expectations. After surgery, both children and parents were overall satisfied.

Conclusion

This study shows that expectations before surgery were high and both children and parents reported positive experiences three months after surgery. A longterm study is warranted if final conclusions are to be drawn.

Successful delayed reconstruction of common peroneal neuroma-in-continuity using sural nerve graft

Injuries of the common peroneal nerve (CPN) are frequent and associated with poor motor outcomes. So far, the opinion is held, that nerve reconstruction is reasonable and indicated up to 6 months after injury. We describe successful sural nerve interposition grafting in a patient with neuroma-in-continuity formation of the CPN, presenting with foot drop, 13 months after injury. Due to this positive result, we think nerve grafting in neuroma-in-continuity lesions of the CPN should be contemplated in patients with foot drop even more than one year after injury.

[Management of upper obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. Long-term results of non-operative treatment in 22 children]

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) is always debated, especially for upper plexus palsy. Some authors perform early surgical treatment in case of absence of biceps contraction at the age of 3 months. Others prefer to wait until the age of 6 months before considering a surgical procedure when no suspicion of root avulsion is found. We think that a conservative approach with intensive rehabilitation program can obtain good functional outcome for patients who will recover biceps function spontaneously between 3 and 6 months, and that it is not necessary to perform surgery at 3 months. To argue our choice, we have compared the long-term outcome of two groups of children with upper OBPP conservatively treated regarding the age of biceps recovery (before or after 3 months).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two patients with non operated upper roots birth palsy, followed in Timone's Hospital of Marseille by a multidisciplinary team, have recovered a biceps contraction between 1 and 8 months and were retrospectively included in this study. All children underwent an intensive rehabilitation program since birth, performed by a specialized physiotherapist. Patients were reviewed, and their shoulder function was assessed using Mallet score. The score was analysed regarding the age of biceps recovery.

RESULTS

The mean follow up was 8.2 years. Nine children recovered a biceps contraction at 3 months of age or before; the mean global Mallet score was 4.11. Thirteen children recovered a biceps contraction after 3 months of age (between 3 and 8 months); the mean global Mallet score was 3.92. The difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that global shoulder function is comparable for two groups. The children who did not recover a biceps contraction at 3 months of age had a global shoulder function as good as the one who recovered biceps function earlier. We think our intensive rehabilitation program allowed us to avoid a useless early surgery. Surgical plexus treatment was indicated for children who did not have biceps contraction after 6 months of age.

Electromyography, nerve action potential, and compound motor action potentials in obstetric brachial plexus lesions: validation in the absence of a "gold standard"

OBJECTIVE

Obstetric brachial plexus lesions (OBPLs) are caused by traction to the brachial plexus during labor. Typically, in these lesions, the nerves are usually not completely ruptured but form a "neuroma-in-continuity." Even in the most severe OBPL lesions, at least some axons will pass through this neuroma-in-continuity and reach the tubes distal to the lesion site. These axons may be particularly prone to abnormal branching and misrouting, which may explain the typical feature of co-contraction. An additional factor that may reduce functional regeneration is that improper central motor programming may occur. Surgery should be restricted to severe cases in which spontaneous restoration of function will not occur, i.e., in neurotmesis or root avulsions. A major problem is how to predict whether function will be best after spontaneous nerve outgrowth or after nerve reconstructive surgery. When a decision has been made to perform an early surgical exploration, what to do with the neuroma-in-continuity can be a problem. The intraoperative appraisal is difficult and depends on experience, but even in experienced hands, misjudgment can be made.

METHODS

We performed an observational study to assess whether early electromyography (at the age of 1 month) is able to predict severe lesions. Additionally, the value of intraoperative nerve action potential and compound motor action potentials was investigated.

RESULTS

Severe cases of OBPL can be identified at 1 month of age on the basis of clinical findings and needle electromyography of the biceps. This outcome needs independent validation, which is currently in progress. Nerve action potential and compound motor action potential recordings show statistically significant differences on the group level between avulsion, neurotmesis, axonotmesis, and normal. For the individual patient, a clinically useful cutoff point could not be found. Intraoperative nerve action potential and compound motor action potential recordings do not add to the decision making during surgery.

CONCLUSION

The absence of a "gold standard" for the assessment of the severity of the OBPL lesion makes prognostic studies of OBPL complex. The currently available assessment strategies used to obtain the best possible solutions are discussed.