Salvage of externally exposed ventricular assist devices

Complex wound management in ventricular assist device (VAD) patients: the role of aggressive debridement and vascularized soft tissue coverage

BACKGROUND

Infections and complex wounds after ventricular assist device (VAD) placement can result in significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate complex wound management in the VAD patient, and to describe a treatment protocol for these challenging and potentially mortal complications.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed to examine all patients who underwent continuous flow, second-generation VAD placement at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between March 2008 and April 2013.

RESULTS

Overall, 150 VADs were placed, with 12 (8%) patients requiring 15 operative interventions by the plastic surgery services. The most common indication for operative intervention was a complicated wound with VAD exposure (5/12, 41.7%). All patients underwent aggressive operative debridement, and 11/12 (92%) underwent vascularized soft tissue coverage. Flaps commonly utilized included rectus abdominus myocutaneous (n = 4), rectus abdominus muscle (n = 4), pectoralis major (n = 3), and omentum (n = 3). Three patients experienced complications which required a return to the operating room, including 1 flap loss, 1 hematoma, and 1 wound dehiscence requiring further soft tissue coverage. Salvage was achieved, yet a 50% mortality rate in follow-up was noted.

CONCLUSION

Complex wound management in VAD patients can be achieved with aggressive debridement and vascularized soft tissue coverage, most commonly utilizing well-vascularized rectus abdominus muscle or omental flaps. Plastic surgeons should be familiar with the armamentarium at their disposal when approaching these challenging cases as VAD wound complications stand to become an increasingly prevalent issue.

Transdiaphragmatic omental harvest: a simple, efficient method for sternal wound coverage

BACKGROUND

The greater omentum is easily harvested for coverage of sternal wounds without muscle sacrifice. Its major disadvantage is a laparotomy incision with potential bowel injury, adhesions, or hernia. Over the past 20 years, the authors' technique has evolved to use a transdiaphragmatic opening for omental harvest when possible.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 140 consecutive patients undergoing omental flap harvest for treatment of sternal wounds following median sternotomy. Patients were divided into two groups by access incision: laparotomy incision (n = 80) versus a transdiaphragmatic opening (n = 60).

RESULTS

The authors found that both techniques provided reliable closure of sternal wounds, but the transdiaphragmatic approach was faster, with less blood loss. There was no significant difference in rates of ventral hernias. We had only one bowel injury (laparotomy group) and no postoperative abdominal bleeding or small bowel obstruction.

CONCLUSION

Transdiaphragmatic omental harvest provides safe and efficient coverage of deep sternal wounds without a laparotomy incision.

Successful Salvage of Ventricular-Assist Devices in the Setting of Pump Pocket Infection

Implantable ventricular-assist devices (VADs) have been approved for use both as a bridge to heart transplantation and as a destination therapy. Rising numbers of patients are surviving with these devices for several years. However, infections of these foreign bodies are serious and frequent complications, often requiring removal of the implant, with serious health consequences. Given the increased use of VADs as life-preserving destination therapy, explantation of these devices in the face of infection is impractical. We evaluated and successfully treated 2 patients with VAD pocket infections referred by the cardiac surgery service at our institution using aggressive surgical and pharmacologic therapy, with the goal of preserving the VADs. However, this is still a largely unsolved dilemma requiring further exploration into prevention and treatment since these devastating infections will likely become a more frequent reconstructive challenge.

Candida infections of medical devices

The number of indwelling medical devices is escalating, and an increasing proportion of device-related infections are being caused by Candida spp. Candida spp. produce biofilms on synthetic materials, which facilitates adhesion of the organisms to devices and renders them relatively refractory to medical therapy. Management of device-related Candida infections can be challenging. Removal of the infected device is generally needed to establish cure of Candida infections of medical devices. However, since the pathogenesis of Candida bloodstream infection is complicated, more studies are necessary to determine the role of catheter exchange in patients with both gastrointestinal tract mucositis and indwelling catheters. The medical and economic impact of these infections is enormous.

LVAD bloodstream infections: therapeutic rationale for transplantation after LVAD infection

INTRODUCTION

Patients who have ventricular assist devices (VADs) and experience bloodstream infection (BSI) have high mortality. We addressed 2 questions raised by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) priority policy for this problem: 1) Are organs wasted on this ultra-high-risk group? 2) Can device-related BSI be differentiated from transient BSI?

METHODS

Patients with VADs who underwent heart transplantation from 1987 to 2001, who had BSI during VAD support, and who had positive cultures at VAD explant (device-related BSI, n = 10) were compared with those with negative cultures at explant (non-device-related BSI, n = 11).

RESULTS

Patients with device-related BSI had an 80% (8/10) rate of persistent bacteremia; 30 days and 1 year after transplantation, mortality was 14% and 26%, respectively. Non-device-related BSI (n = 11) persisted in 18% (2/11); peri-operative and 1-year mortalities were 9% and 13%. Duration of VAD support predicted infection (132 vs 48 days, p < 0.001); hypo-albuminemia (2.9 +/- 0.5 mg/dl vs 3.3 +/- 0.8 mg/dl, p < 0.05), and a resistant organism predicted a device-related BSI. These patients had increased intubation requirements and had increased creatinine concentration during the first post-operative week, with no difference in liver function, blood loss, transfusions (packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, or platelets), or hemodynamic stability vs patients with non-device BSI. Despite decreased immunosuppression, we found no difference in acute rejection events with device-related BSI. Re-infection with the pre-operative organism occurred in only 1 patient per group.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that urgent (Status 1A) cardiac transplantation is effective in stable patients with device-related BSI, and these data support the current UNOS policy. However, an extra-device source of BSI should be excluded by considering the isolated organism, the baseline nutritional status, and other risk factors.

Infection in ventricular assist devices: prevention and treatment

Infection is one of the most important challenges to the use of implanted mechanical circulatory support systems (MCSS), particularly as we enter the era of permanent device use in patients who are not candidates for cardiac transplantation. This paper describes the pathogenesis of MCSS infection, with particular attention to the role of biofilm-forming bacteria. Suggestions are presented for the prevention and treatment of infections in implanted MCSS.