Surgeon and healer

Venous thromboembolism in plastic surgery: incidence, current practice and recommendations

Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) are an important concern due to their frequently asymptomatic presentation and significant morbidity and/or mortality. The true incidence of this disease process is unknown as (i) screening procedures and (ii) prophylaxis protocols are frequently lacking in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to identify published thromboprophylactic recommendations established in the plastic surgery literature and to provide a review on thromboembolism and current methods of prophylaxis. A systematic evaluation of all published guidelines for thromboembolism prophylaxis in plastic surgery was conducted. We report on 24 studies in favour of, and three studies against, mechanical and/or pharmacological prophylaxis. Thromboprophylactic recommendations were published by a small randomised trial (grade B, level 2), six retrospective studies (grade C, level IV), two literature reviews (grade C, level V), two surveys (grade C, level V), three narrative reviews (Continuing Medical Education) (grade C, level V) and 10 expert recommendations (grade C, level V). The three publications against prophylaxis were composed of a retrospective study (grade C, level IV) and two case series with no control group (grade C, level V). There is a significant paucity of category A or B evidence favouring thromboprophylaxis in the plastic surgery patient population. There is a need for further research in established thromboprophylaxis guidelines in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus after face lift: a study of incidence and prophylaxis

Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus are known risks of surgery. However, the incidence of these conditions in face lift is unknown. In this study, the incidence of deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolus after face lift is studied and factors associated with thromboembolic complications are evaluated. One-third of the active members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery were randomly selected. Participating surgeons completed a one-page survey providing information on face-lift procedures during a 12-month study period. A response rate of 80 percent was achieved, with 273 of the 342 surgeons responding to the survey. A total of 9937 face-lift procedures were reported in the 1-year study period. There were 35 patients with deep venous thrombosis (0.35 percent), 14 patients with pulmonary embolus (0.14 percent), and 1 patient death in the series. Although 43.5 percent of patients underwent face lift under general anesthesia, 83.7 percent of deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolus events occurred with general anesthesia. For prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolus, 19.7 percent of the surgeons used intermittent compression devices, 19.6 percent used thromboembolic disease hose or Ace wraps, and 60.7 percent used no prophylaxis. Of patients developing deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolus, 4.1 percent were treated prophylactically with intermittent compression devices, 36.7 percent with thromboembolic disease hose/Ace wraps, and 59.2 percent with no prophylaxis. It was found that deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolus after face lift is a measurable complication experienced by one of nine surgeons surveyed. Deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolus is more likely to occur when the procedure is performed under general anesthesia. The majority of plastic surgeons surveyed used no prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis when performing face-lift procedures. Intermittent compression devices were associated with significantly fewer thromboembolic complications, whereas Ace wrap/thromboembolic disease hose afforded no protection against deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolus when used alone. In conclusion, aesthetic surgeons should consider adopting intermittent compression devices when performing face lift under general anesthesia.