Functional outcome after surgery for trigonocephaly

Neurodevelopmental Problems in Non-Syndromic Craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis is the premature fusion of calvarial sutures, resulting in deformed craniofacial appearance. Hence, for a long time, it has been considered an aesthetic disorder. Fused sutures restrict growth adjacent to the suture, but compensatory skull growth occurs to accommodate the growing brain. The primary goal for the management of this craniofacial deformity has been to release the constricted skull and reform the distorted shape of the skull vault. However, the intellectual and behavioral prognosis of affected children has also been taken into consideration since the beginning of the modern era of surgical management of craniosynostosis. A growing body of literature indicates that extensive surgery, such as the whole-vault cranioplasty approach, would result in better outcomes. In addition, the age at treatment is becoming a major concern for optimal outcome in terms of cosmetic results as well as neurodevelopment. This review will discuss major concerns regarding neurodevelopmental issues and related factors.

Analysis of individualized education programs to quantify long-term educational needs following surgical intervention for single-suture craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) is a common craniofacial condition with potential neurocognitive sequelae.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify any long-term functional academic and behavioural difficulties of children with SSC as indicated by the need for individualized education programs (IEPs), despite having undergone surgical treatment.

METHODS

Records of all school-age patients from 1992 to 2011 who underwent operative intervention for SSC were identified. Fifty-nine patients' guardians were contacted by telephone to provide informed consent for completion of a mailed standardized questionnaire querying demographic information as well as information regarding the patient's health, family and educational history; specifically whether the patient had ever been provided educational support as delineated in an IEP. The primary outcome measure was the history of the patient being assigned educational support as delineated in an IEP.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven consenting guardians completed and returned the standardized questionnaire (response rate 62.7%). Twenty-one patients were male and 16 were female, with an age range of five to 14 years (mean age 10.2 years). Eleven (29.7%) patients had a previous history of or currently were receiving educational support delineated in an IEP.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher proportion of school-age patients with a history of SSC (status postsurgical intervention) in the present study received educational support delineated in an IEP than the proportion of IEPs in the general student population of the United States (11.3%).

Trigonocephaly: A simple modified technique

Trigonocephaly is the premature fusion of the metopic suture leading to deformation of anterior calvarium causing keel shaped deformity of forehead. In most cases, surgical correction is for aesthetic and psychosocial reasons. Various techniques have been described. Here we describe a technique, which is simple to perform with good postoperative results. Metopic suture is excised, one side is reconstructed in finger clasping manner to fit in an expanded area, and the other side is transected and simply molded, and all these fixed with nonabsorbable suture. Supraorbital horizontal bar is mobilized on either side anteriorly and fixed with titanium plate and screws.

Neurodevelopmental and esthetic results in children after surgical correction of metopic suture synostosis: a single institutional experience

INTRODUCTION

Metopic suture synostosis leading to trigonocephaly is considered the second most frequent type of craniosynostosis. Besides esthetic results, we present 25 consecutive pediatric cases operated upon metopic suture synostosis with a focus on the child's motor, speech, and neurocognitive development.

METHODS

Twenty-five children (aged 6 to 33 months; median 9.2 months) with trigonocephaly were operated upon between 2002 and 2012 with fronto-orbital advancement including frontal bone cranioplasty and fronto-orbital bandeau remodeling. Neurodevelopmental deficits were evaluated by a standardized questionnaire including gross motor function, manual coordination, speech, and cognitive function performed by independent pediatric/developmental neurologists before surgery and at 6 and 12 months of time interval postoperatively.

RESULTS

Twenty-one (84 %) boys and four (16 %) girls were included in this study. Mean follow-up period was 33 ± 28 months. Outcome analysis for esthetic results showed a high degree of satisfaction by the parents and treating physicians in 23 cases (92 %). Preoperative evaluation revealed neurodevelopmental deficits in 10 children (40 %; six mild, four moderate degree). Twelve children (48 %) were proven to have a normal preoperative neuropediatric development. Mild or moderate developmental restraints were no longer apparent in 6/13, improved but still apparent in 3/13, and stable in 4/13, 6 months after cranial vault reconstruction. At 12 months of follow-up, deficits were no longer present in 9/13 and improved in 4/13. Apart from this cohort, two children were diagnosed with a syndromic form, and one child had a fetal valproate syndrome. In these three children, neurodevelopmental deficits were more pronounced. Neurocognitive progress was obvious, but was comparably slower, and major deficits were still apparent at last follow-up. All children with proven mild/moderate/severe deficits received intensive physiotherapy, logopedic, or neurobehavioral support.

CONCLUSIONS

As shown in a single-center observation, surgical correction of metopic suture synostosis not only refines esthetic appearance but also might improve neurodevelopmental outcome if deficits are apparent, even in syndromic forms of the deformity under additional physiotherapy, logopedic, or neurobehavioral support.

Anterior fronto-orbital remodeling for trigonocephay

INTRODUCTION

Trigonocephaly secondary to the premature fusion of the metopic synostosis is associated to a risk of cerebral compression and several craniofacial morphological alterations. Numerous surgical techniques have been proposed. They all carry a risk of secondary temporal hollowing

PURPOSE

The aim of this paper is to describe the surgical technique used for trigonocephaly at the craniofacial unit of Hopital Necker Enfants Malades (French National Referral Center for Faciocraniosynostosis) focusing on its advantages and limitations. Resorbable osteosynthesis should be part of the current techniques.

Surgical treatment of trigonocephaly: technique and long-term results in 48 cases

OBJECT

The authors present their experience in the surgical treatment of metopic synostosis by orbital bandeau remodeling and frontal bone rotation. The pitfalls and advantages of the surgical technique are discussed, along with the long-term clinical results in 48 consecutive cases.

METHODS

Forty-eight consecutive patients in whom trigonocephaly was diagnosed between 1990 and 2009 were treated with frontal bone rotation and frontoorbital bandeau remodeling. Of these patients, 38 (79%) were boys and 10 (21%) were girls. The age at the time of surgical treatment ranged between 4 and 42 months (mean ± SD 11.4 ± 8.7 months). The average follow-up period was 5.5 ± 4.2 years (range 5 months-19 years). The preoperative and latest postoperative photographs of the patients were evaluated for the following features: 1) shape of the forehead; 2) hypotelorism; and 3) temporal depression. Scores of 0, 1, or 2 were assigned for each item: 0 was normal, 1 meant moderate deformity, and 2 denoted severe deformity.

RESULTS

In the early postoperative period, no complications were documented. The average hospitalization period was 4 days. Follow-up radiographs or 3D CT scans were obtained at regular intervals. The mean preoperative scores for the evaluated items were 1.38 ± 0.49 for the shape of the forehead, 1.33 ± 0.48 for hypotelorism, and 1.7 ± 0.46 for the temporal depression. The mean postoperative scores were 0.06 ± 0.24 for the shape of the forehead, 0.21 ± 0.4 for hypotelorism, and 0.67 ± 0.48 for the temporal depression. Overall, the total preoperative score dropped from 4.4 to 0.93 postoperatively (p < 0.05). All the patients were contented with the cosmetic results.

CONCLUSIONS

Early detection and treatment of metopic suture synostosis has a significant, favorable influence on the outcomes. Good understanding of the structural abnormality and the pathophysiological mechanisms of the possible complications is very important for performing proper surgical reconstruction.

Surgical treatment of single-suture craniosynostosis: an argument for quantitative methods to evaluate cosmetic outcomes

The traditional reasons for surgical intervention in children with single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) are cosmetic improvement and the avoidance/treatment of intracranial hypertension, which has been thought to contribute to neurocognitive deficits. Despite considerable work on the topic, the exact prevalence of intracranial hypertension in the population of patients with SSC is unknown, although it appears to be present in only a minority. Additionally, recent neuropsychological and anatomical literature suggests that the subtle neurocognitive deficits identified in children with a history of SSC may not result from external compression. They may instead reflect an underlying developmental condition that includes disordered primary CNS development and early suture fusion. This implies that current surgical techniques are unlikely to prevent neurocognitive deficits in patients with SSC. As such, the most common indication for surgical treatment in SSC is cosmetic, and most patients benefit from considerable subjective cosmetic normalization following surgery. Pediatric craniofacial surgeons have not, however, agreed upon objective means to assess postoperative cranial morphological improvement. We should therefore endeavor to agree upon objective craniometric tools for the assessment of operative outcomes, allowing us to accurately compare the various surgical techniques that are currently available.

Memory and response inhibition in young children with single-suture craniosynostosis

Using two versions of the A-not-B task, memory and response inhibition were assessed in 17- to 24-month-old children with surgically corrected single-suture craniosynostosis (cases) and unaffected children (controls). Children's development and language were initially assessed on average at 6-7 months of age and again at this second visit. Cases and controls performed at equivalent levels on average, with cases performing slightly better than controls on several of the variables measured. However, fewer cases than controls were able to complete the more challenging of the two tasks, which may have predictive significance for later functioning. Children's age and cognitive ability were related to successful performance on the A-not-B task. Among cases, age of cranioplastic surgery was unrelated to performance. Our findings suggest that children with single-suture craniosynostosis show normal development of visual memory and response inhibition in the age range studied here.

Non-syndromic trigonocephaly: surgical decision making and long-term cosmetic results

BACKGROUND

Surgical correction is often required for cosmetic correction of trigonocephaly. The purpose of this paper was to report the long-term aesthetic outcome as appreciated by the parents/patients themselves. The self-evaluation of cosmetic outcome after trigonocephaly correction has not previously been reported. The management and different surgical techniques utilized over a 16-year period are discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational study was undertaken of the clinical outcome, operative data, complications and cosmetic satisfaction of these trigonocephaly patients. The parents/child were asked to rate their satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome both in terms of head shape and scar appearance, on a five-point scale (excellent-5, very good-4, good-3, fair-2 and poor-1).

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients presented with non-syndromic trigonocephaly over the 16 years. Nineteen of 63 had a mild form of trigonocephaly and were managed conservatively. The remainder underwent surgical correction. Forty-two of 44 (95%) underwent fronto-orbital advancement with either barrel staving (26/44) or frontal bone rotation/re-modelling (16/44), with 2 of 44 having burring of the metopic ridge. Head shape rating was regarded as excellent in 25 of 63 (40%), very good in 18 of 63 (28%), good in 18 of 63 (28%) and fair in 2 of 63 (4%). Of those that underwent surgery, the scar was zigzag in 32 of 44 and straight in 12 of 44. Scar was rated as being excellent in 21 of 44 (48%), very good in 12 of 44 (28%) good in 11 of 44 (24%).

CONCLUSIONS

Metopic synostosis can result in varying degrees of severity. Milder forms can be treated conservatively, with more severe forms requiring both frontal bone re-modelling and fronto-orbital advancement. Surgical correction results in a high level of patient/parent satisfaction.