Modification of the Skoog principle of digital flap interposition with a new technique of web space reconstruction

A Novel Method for Correction of the Tethered and Contracted Facial Scars: The Three-Dimensional Subcutaneous Z-Plasty

OBJECTIVE

Scar revision is 1 of the basic surgery in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery. The classic treatment of the scar is excision scarless tissue, wide undermining and suture by planes. This method has had unsatisfying results on contracted and tethered scars. The aim of this study is to present the three-dimensional subcutaneous z-plasty technique for correction of tethered facial scars without scar lengthening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty tethered scars were corrected using this technique. All scars were located on the face. Objectively, the final result was evaluated by using the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale. Subjectively, patients' overall satisfaction was assessed 1 year after the surgical operation. In addition, the information on the age, gender, etiology, scar location, scar length, type of anesthesia, and follow-up period were examined.

RESULTS

This procedure was used in nineteen patients (8 males and eleven females). The mean follow-up period was 15.3 months. There was a mean increase of 2.85 points increase in the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale value. The overall success rates for the procedure, as assessed by the patients, were: very satisfied in 12 patients, satisfied in 5 patients, and slightly satisfied in 2 patients. One patient had minimal wound dehiscence. No complications including hypertrophic scar, infection, hematoma, and suture reaction were observed in any patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The three-dimensional subcutaneous z-plasty technique is a procedure that uses only basic plastic surgery principles. It offers a good solution for the correction of tethered and contracted scars without recurrence. This technique combines the advantages of elliptical excision and z-plasty by enabling the augmentation of the depressed area without extending the scar length.

Scar Revision Surgery: The Patient's Perspective

Background

Insufficient satisfaction outcome literature exists to assist consultations for scar revision surgery; such outcomes should reflect the patient's perspective. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate scar revision patient satisfaction outcomes, according to specified patient-selection criteria.

Methods

Patients (250) were randomly selected for telephone contacting regarding scar revisions undertaken between 2007-2011. Visual analogue scores were obtained for scars pre- and post-revision surgery. Surgery selection criteria were; 'presence' of sufficient time for scar maturation prior to revision, technical issues during or wound complications from the initial procedure that contributed to poor scarring, and 'absence' of site-specific or patient factors that negatively influence outcomes. Patient demographics, scar pathogenesis (elective vs. trauma), underlying issue (functional/symptomatic vs. cosmetic) and revision surgery details were also collected with the added use of a real-time, hospital database.

Results

Telephone contacting was achieved for 211 patients (214 scar revisions). Satisfaction outcomes were '2% worse, 16% no change, and 82% better'; a distribution maintained between body sites and despite whether surgery was functional/symptomatic vs. cosmetic. Better outcomes were reported by patients who sustained traumatic scars vs. those who sustained scars by elective procedures (91.80% vs. 77.78%, P=0.016) and by females vs. males (85.52% vs. 75.36%, P<0.05), particularly in the elective group where males (36.17%) were more likely to report no change or worse outcomes versus females (16.04%) (P<0.01).

Conclusions

Successful scar revision outcomes may be achieved using careful patient selection. This study provides useful information for referring general practitioners, and patient-surgeon consultations, when planning scar revision.