Breathlessness, anxiety, and respiratory physiology

The curious 2000-year case of asthma

Millions worldwide have asthma, with the numbers succumbing increasing sharply in the past two decades. After 2000 years of scientific study, who succumbs to asthma when is as puzzling as who regains health when and how. The discipline of psychosomatic medicine and science investigates and treats diseases like asthma that typically confound general medicine. Still psychosomatic medicine, like general medicine, only manages but does not remedy asthma, which can currently only be in remission but not cured. This historical review reveals the progress and missteps that have been made in the study and treatment of asthma by comparing the general medicine approach with the major research findings on asthma published over 60 years in Psychosomatic Medicine. Research has identified antecedent, collateral, and subsequent factors to scientifically describe and control this disease in terms of diagnosis, management, and treatment. Paradoxically and regrettably, the prognosis for those with asthma is worse than ever. Curious also that a noninfectious disease should spread so rapidly and mostly for specific groups identified by variables like age, gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Furthermore, partial, not full, family concordance indicates merely genetic influence, not determination. General medicine now focuses on enumerating the range of environmental and situational triggers, or stimuli, producing asthma and describing the pathophysiology of bronchial inflammation. With a more comprehensive multifactorial approach, psychosomatic medicine seems well suited to investigate further the physiological, psychological, social, and environmental factors implicated in this medical conundrum. A future challenge for psychosomatic medicine is to stem the tide of rising prevalence and cure the disease of asthma.

Do panic symptom profiles influence response to a hypoxic challenge in patients with panic disorder? A preliminary report

OBJECTIVE

This study examined how panic symptom profiles affect response to a hypoxic laboratory challenge in patients with panic disorder.

METHODS

Seven patients whose naturally occurring panic attacks were characterized by prominent respiratory symptoms (Resp subgroup) were compared and contrasted with seven patients who did not report respiratory symptoms during panic attacks (NonResp subgroup). All were administered a novel 12% O2 challenge and assessed with measures of tidal volume, respiratory rate, end-tidal CO2, anxiety, and panic symptoms.

RESULTS

Although the Resp and NonResp subgroups showed equivalent increases in anxiety and panic symptoms, the Resp subgroup showed greater fluctuation in tidal volume during and after the challenge as well as overall lower levels of end-tidal CO2.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest the importance of panic symptom profiles in determining respiratory responses to a hypoxic challenge in patients with panic disorder. These findings are discussed in light of current theories of panic disorder, with particular attention to respiratory disturbances in this disorder.