The role of tomography in the evaluation of the postoperative spinal fusion

MDCT Versus Digital Radiography in the Evaluation of Bone Healing in Orthopedic Patients

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of bone healing in orthopedic patients is usually monitored by radiographs in two views. The purpose of our study was to compare multiplanar reconstructions from MDCT data sets with digital radiographs for assessing the extent of bone healing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three orthopedic patients (19 women, 24 men) who underwent MDCT and radiography after arthrodesis, fractures, or spinal fusions were included in our study. MDCT was performed on an MX 8000IDT scanner and served as the gold standard. The technical parameters were adapted to the anatomic region. A bone algorithm for reconstruction was used (3,500/600 H). Multiplanar reconstructions were calculated in two orthogonal planes. All patients underwent digital radiography on a Multix FD system in two views according to standard procedures. Multiplanar reconstructions and radiographs were analyzed by two musculoskeletal radiologists in a consensus interpretation to determine bone healing using a semiquantitative approach.

RESULTS

In 27 patients (63%), MDCT and digital radiography were concordant with regard to the extent of bone healing, whereas in 16 patients (37%) the results were not concordant. In eight patients (19%) digital radiographs underestimated the extent of bone healing, whereas in another eight patients (19%) they overestimated the degree of fusion.

CONCLUSION

MDCT using high-quality 2D reformatting is recommended as the primary imaging technique for the evaluation of bone healing.

Complications in spinal fusion

Complications in spinal fusion can lead to less than desirable results. The complications of spinal fusion in the cervical and lumbar spine are discussed. Methods of avoiding and correcting complications also are reviewed. Through a better understanding, it is hoped that complications can be prevented.

Painful pseudarthrosis following lumbar spinal fusion: detection by combined SPECT and planar bone scintigraphy

Twenty-six adult patients more than 6-months post-lumbar spinal fusion were studied. Flexion and extension radiographs showing motion or bone scintigrams showing focal areas of increased activity within the fusion mass were considered positive for pseudarthrosis. Patients were classified as either symptomatic or asymptomatic. Among the 15 symptomatic patients, scintigraphy had a sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.83 which was superior to the 0.43 sensitivity and 0.50 specificity of radiography. Six of the 11 asymptomatic patients had focal areas of increased activity in the bony fusion mass, possibly reflecting painless pseudarthrosis. Planar imaging was substantially enhanced by SPECT in 14 of the 26 cases. It is concluded that for the patient who remains symptomatic after lumbar spinal fusion, bone scintigraphy with SPECT is of significant value in detecting painful pseudarthrosis.