In situ rigidity of a new sliding rod for management of the growing spine in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

In Vitro Biomechanical Validation of a Self-Adaptive Ratchet Growing Rod Construct for Fusionless Scoliosis Correction

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro biomechanical evaluation of a novel self-adaptive unidirectional ratchet growing rod (RGR) system.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to propose and biomechanically validate a novel RGR construct in vitro using porcine thoracic spines and calculate the tensile force required to elongate the RGR with springs, without springs, and with soft tissue encapsulation (induced in vivo in rabbits).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Literature lacks clear consensus regarding the implant of choice for early-onset scoliosis. Multiple systems are currently available, and each has its own advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, studying novel designs that can credibly accommodate growth and curb deformity progression is of principle importance.

METHODS

In vitro biomechanical motion tests were done using six porcine thoracic spines with pedicle screws at T3 and T8. A pure moment of ±5 Nm was loaded in lateral bending (LB) and flexion-extension. Range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) of each specimen was determined after connecting the free movable growing rods (FGRs), RGRs, and standard rods (SRs). Tensile tests were done to measure the force required to elongate the RGR with springs, without springs, and with soft tissue encapsulation (induced in vivo in rabbits).

RESULTS

Global ROM, implanted T3-T8 ROM, and the NZ of specimens with FGRs and RGRs were significantly higher than that with SRs. The RGRs favored unidirectional elongation in both LB and flexion. The tensile forces required for elongating the RGR without springs, with springs, and with soft tissue capsulation (by a scaled unit of 3 mm) were 3 ± 1.3 N, 10.5 ± 0.4 N, and 48.4 ± 14.4 N, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The RGR could stabilize and favor unidirectional elongation of the implanted spinal column when appropriate forces were present. There was no device failure as far as we have studied and it is anticipated that, with further safety and feasibility assessment, RGRs could be adapted for clinical use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Development of a scoliotic spine model for biomechanical in vitro studies

BACKGROUND

In vitro experiments are important to compare surgical treatments. Especially new implants need preclinical evaluation. However, in vitro experiments with scoliotic specimens are impossible because they are not available. The purpose of this study was to develop an in vitro scoliosis model with cadaveric calf spine specimens, which may serve as a surrogate for human scoliotic spines.

METHODS

Six cadaveric calf spine specimens (T8-L6) were modified in three different steps to create a thoracolumbar scoliosis, convex to the right. First, all intervertebral discs received a nucleotomy. In the second step the cavity was filled with silicone. The silicone hardened in a bend position to obtain an asymmetrical nucleus. Finally, a wedge profile of the vertebral bodies was achieved by unilateral horizontal cuts (T9-L5), followed by spreading and fixation. Flexibility tests in a spine tester were performed in all motion planes with the original spine and after the different steps during the creation of the model.

FINDINGS

A Cobb angle >40° in the frontal plane could be achieved. Additionally, the vertebrae showed an axial rotation to the convex side. The range of motion increased due to the nucleotomy, decreased slightly after replacement with silicone, and decreased below the values of the intact spine after producing the wedge shape of the vertebrae. In each loading direction there was no significant asymmetry in the motion behavior.

INTERPRETATION

This study suggests a method to modify a straight spine specimen into a scoliotic one, which can be used for biomechanical in vitro experiments.

A biomechanical investigation of dual growing rods used for fusionless scoliosis correction

BACKGROUND

The use of dual growing rods is a fusionless surgical approach to the treatment of early onset scoliosis which aims to harness potential growth and correct spinal deformity. The purpose of this study was to compare the in-vitro biomechanical response of two different dual rod designs under axial rotation loading.

METHODS

Six porcine spines were dissected into seven level thoracolumbar multi-segment units. Each specimen was mounted and tested in a biaxial Instron machine, undergoing nondestructive left and right axial rotation to peak moments of 4 Nm at a constant rotation rate of 8 deg. s(-1). A motion tracking system (Optotrak) measured 3D displacements of individual vertebrae. Each spine was tested in an un-instrumented state first and then with appropriately sized semi-constrained and 'rigid' growing rods in alternating sequence. The range of motion, neutral zone size and stiffness were calculated from the moment-rotation curves and intervertebral range of motion was calculated from Optotrak data.

FINDINGS

Irrespective of test sequence, rigid rods showed a significant reduction of total rotation across all instrumented levels (with increased stiffness) whilst semi-constrained rods exhibited similar rotational behavior to the un-instrumented spines (P<0.05). An 11.1% and 8.0% increase in stiffness for left and right axial rotation respectively and 14.9% reduction in total range of motion were recorded with dual rigid rods compared with semi-constrained rods.

INTERPRETATION

Based on these findings, the Semi-constrained growing rods were shown to not increase axial rotation stiffness compared with un-instrumented spines. This is thought to provide a more physiological environment for the growing spine compared to dual rigid rod constructs.

Load-displacement properties of the thoracolumbar calf spine: experimental results and comparison to known human data

The availability of human cadaveric spine specimens for in vitro tests is limited and the risk of infection is now of vital concern. As an alternative or supplement, calf spines have been used as models for human spines, in particular to evaluate spinal implants. However, neither qualitative nor quantitative biomechanical data on calf spines are available for comparison with data on human specimens. The purpose of this study was to determine the fundamental biomechanical properties of calf spines and to compare them with existing data from human specimens. Range of motion, neutral zone, and stiffness properties of thoracolumbar calf spines (T6-L6) were determined under pure moment loading in flexion and extension, axial left/right rotation and right/left lateral bending. Biomechanical similarities were observed between the calf and reported human data, most notably in axial rotation and lateral bending. Range of motion in the lumbar spine in flexion and extension was somewhat less in the calf than that typically reported for the human, though still within the range. These results suggest that the calf spine can be considered on a limited basis as a model for the human spine in certain in vitro tests.