Biocompatible osteoconductive polymer versus iliac graft. A prospective comparative study for the evaluation of fusion pattern after anterior cervical discectomy

Comparison of Interbody Fusion Strategies in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The optimal choice for fusion strategy in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) remains an unresolved issue. This study aims to perform a network meta-analysis and systematic review of fusion rate and complication rate of various fusion strategies used in ACDF.

METHODS

This study followed Prisma guidelines, and we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to November 11, 2022, for Randomized Controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of fusion modalities in ACDF. The primary outcome was the fusion rate and complication rate. The PROSPERO number is CRD42022374440.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis identified 26 Randomized Controlled trial studies with 1789 patients across 15 fusion methods. The cage with autograft + plating showed the highest fusion rate, surpassing other methods like iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) and artificial bone graft (AFG). The stand-alone cage with autograft (SATG) had the second highest fusion rate. Regarding complication rate, the cage with AFG (CAFG) had the highest rate, more than other methods. The ICBG had a higher complication rate compared to ICBG + P, AFG, stand-alone cage with artificial bone graft, SATG, and CALG. The SATG performed well in both fusion and complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we conducted the first network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of various fusion methods in ACDF. Our findings suggest that SATG, with superior performance in fusion rate and complication rate, may be the optimal choice for ACDF. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously until additional research provides further evidence.

Synthetic Bone Graft Materials in Spine Fusion: Current Evidence and Future Trends

Historically, iliac crest bone autograft has been considered the gold standard bone graft substitute for spinal fusion. However, the significant morbidity associated with harvesting procedures has influenced decision-making and practice patterns. To minimize these side effects, many clinicians have pursued the use of bone graft extenders to minimize the amount of autograft required for fusion in certain applications. Synthetic materials, including a variety of ceramic compounds, are a class that has been studied extensively as bone graft extenders. These have been used in combination with a wide array of other biomaterials and investigated in a variety of different spine fusion procedures. This review will summarize the current evidence of different synthetic materials in various spinal fusion procedures and discuss the future of novel synthetics.

Extrusion of Biocompatible Osteoconductive Polymer (BOP) Causing Cervical Myelopathy

BACKGROUND

As the prevalence of spinal fusion surgery has increased, reliable and safe bone graft substitutes have been developed in response. Biocompatible osteoconductive polymer (BOP) has been used as a bone graft alternative for spine surgery. We present a case of cervical myelopathy due to extrusion of BOP 23 years after surgery and discuss the pathophysiology in terms of spinal fusion.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 65-year-old man presented with a 3-month history of cervical myelopathic symptoms. Twenty-three years earlier, the patient had undergone cervical surgery for a C6-7 herniated disc with the use of BOP. Imaging studies of the cervical spine showed cord compression due to extruded BOP at C6-7. He underwent corpectomy of the C7 vertebral body and removal of the BOP for the neural decompression, combined with interbody fusion by use of an iliac bone graft and plate fixation. During the operation, crumbly fibers of the BOP were easily removed. His myelopathic symptoms improved immediately after surgery. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging also showed successful decompression of the spinal cord. Histologically, a foreign body reaction and bony degeneration were found around the synthetic fibers of the BOP.

CONCLUSIONS

Spine surgeons should recognize the pathophysiology of the BOP used for spine fusion surgery. Although BOP is not currently used for spinal surgery, patients undergoing previous surgery with the BOP can present with related complications. Revision surgery is recommended to remove the unincorporated BOP and achieve solid spine fusion.

A Novel 3D Printed Titanium Implant for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Cervical spondylosis is a common age-related disorder that results in pain, radiculopathy, and myelopathy. A retrospective chart and radiograph review of a 50-year-old male who underwent surgical treatment for correction of cervical radiculopathy was performed. Immediately after surgery the patient reported complete relief of his preoperative arm pain. In two weeks, he had recovered full strength and sensation. Six months postoperatively, the patient reported relief of all pain and complete recovery of strength and sensation. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with an open architecture titanium implant was successfully utilized to improve cervical radiculopathy. This technique increases the likelihood of fusion and improved patient outcome. The objective of the report is to highlight the treatment of cervical radiculopathy through anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a 3D printed titanium alloy with an arched design and large porous openings. This is one of the first reports using this interbody device in a multilevel procedure.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: review and update for radiologists

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this article are to describe the various types of interbody grafts and anterior cervical plating systems, techniques for optimizing evaluation of cervical spine metallic implants on CT and MR imaging, expected appearance and complications of ACDF on postoperative imaging and imaging assessment of fusion. Optimization for optimizing metal induced artifacts.

CONCLUSION

Currently, ACDF is the most commonly performed surgical procedure for degenerative cervical spine disease. Interbody fusion is performed with bone grafts or interbody spacers, and may be supplemented with anterior cervical plating. Compressive pathologies at the vertebral body level may be addressed by simultaneous corpectomy. Postoperatively, imaging plays an integral role in routine screening of asymptomatic individuals, fusion assessment and evaluation of complications.

Implantation of the anterior atlantoaxial lateral mass intervertebral cage using the transoral approach

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possibility of implanting the anterior atlantoaxial lateral mass intervertebral cage, a new type of fixation, by the transoral approach.

METHOD

This study examined the possibility of implantation in vivo by the quantitative measurement on the dry atlantoaxial bone and implantation of the anterior atlantoaxial lateral mass intervertebral cage in specimens. Anterior atlantoaxial lateral mass intervertebral cages were implanted in 10 atlantoaxial joint specimens using the transoral approach. Eight anatomical parameters (width, the thickness, ordinates, abscissas, and declination angles of the mass) from each of the 30 dry atlas and axis bone specimens were measured. These parameters determined the size and the design of the cage and the way of implantation.

RESULTS

The course of the vertebral artery forms the safe boundary for transoral surgery. The shape of the area of work exposure was an inverted trapezoid. In specimens, the anterior atlantoaxial lateral mass intervertebral cages could be successfully implanted using the transoral approach. The parameters of the human atlantoaxial lateral masses exposed anteriorly showed that there was enough space, for the safe anterior implantation of the cage. The surgery using the transoral atlantoaxial reduction and plate makes possible the implantation of the anterior cage.

CONCLUSION

The implantation of anterior atlantoaxial lateral mass intervertebral cage through transoral approach is possible.

Comparison of surgical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: does the intra-operative use of a microscope improve surgical outcomes

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this study was to assess and compare the complications profile as well as long-term clinical outcomes between patients undergoing an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) procedure with and without the use of an intra-operative microscope.

METHODS

One hundred and forty adult patients (non-microscope cohort: 81; microscope cohort: 59) undergoing ACDF at a major academic medical center were included in this study. Enrollment criteria included available demographic, surgical and clinical outcome data. All patients had prospectively collected patient-reported outcomes measures and a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients completed the neck disability index (NDI), short-form 12 (SF-12) and visual analog pain scale (VAS) before surgery, then at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Clinical outcomes and complication rates were compared between both patient cohorts.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between both cohorts. The mean ± standard deviation duration of surgery was longer in the microscope cohort (microscope: 169±34 minutes vs. non-microscope: 98±42 minutes, P<0.001). There was no significant difference between cohorts in the incidence of nerve root injury (P=0.99) or incidental durotomy (P=0.32). At 3 months post-operatively, both cohorts demonstrated similar improvement in VAS-neck pain (P=0.69), NDI (P=0.86), SF-12 PCS (P=0.84) and SF-12 MCS (P=0.75). At 2-year post-operatively, both the microscope and non-microscope cohorts demonstrated similar improvement from base line in NDI (microscope: 13.52±25.77 vs. non-microscope: 19.51±27.47, P<0.18), SF-12 PCS (microscope: 4.15±26.39 vs. non-microscope: 11.98±22.96, P<0.07), SF-12 MCS (microscope: 9.47±32.38 vs. non-microscope: 16.19±30.44, P<0.21). Interestingly at 2 years, the change in VAS neck pain score was significantly different between cohorts (microscope: 2.22±4.00 vs. non-microscope: 3.69±3.61, P<0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the intra-operative use of a microscope does not improve overall surgery-related outcomes, nor does it lead to superior long-term outcomes in pain and functional disability, 2 years after index surgery.

Synthetic bone graft versus autograft or allograft for spinal fusion: a systematic review

The purpose of this review was to compare the efficacy and safety of synthetic bone graft substitutes versus autograft or allograft for the treatment of lumbar and cervical spinal degenerative diseases. Multiple major medical reference databases were searched for studies that evaluated spinal fusion using synthetic bone graft substitutes (either alone or with an autograft or allograft) compared with autograft and allograft. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and cohort studies with more than 10 patients were included. Radiographic fusion, patient-reported outcomes, and functional outcomes were the primary outcomes of interest. The search yielded 214 citations with 27 studies that met the inclusion criteria. For the patients with lumbar spinal degenerative disease, data from 19 comparative studies were included: 3 RCTs, 12 prospective, and 4 retrospective studies. Hydroxyapatite (HA), HA+collagen, β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), calcium sulfate, or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) were used. Overall, there were no differences between the treatment groups in terms of fusion, functional outcomes, or complications, except in 1 study that found higher rates of HA graft absorption. For the patients with cervical degenerative conditions, data from 8 comparative studies were included: 4 RCTs and 4 cohort studies (1 prospective and 3 retrospective studies). Synthetic grafts included HA, β-TCP/HA, PMMA, and biocompatible osteoconductive polymer (BOP). The PMMA and BOP grafts led to lower fusion rates, and PMMA, HA, and BOP had greater risks of graft fragmentation, settling, and instrumentation problems compared with iliac crest bone graft. The overall quality of evidence evaluating the potential use and superiority of the synthetic biological materials for lumbar and cervical fusion in this systematic review was low or insufficient, largely due to the high potential for bias and small sample sizes. Thus, definitive conclusions or recommendations regarding the use of these synthetic materials should be made cautiously and within the context of the limitations of the evidence.

Current concepts of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a review of literature

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a safe and effective procedure for degenerative cervical spinal disease unresponsive to conservative management and its outstanding results have been reported. To increase fusion rates and decrease complications, numerous graft materials, cage, anterior plating and total disc replacement have been developed, and better results were reported from those, but still there are areas that have not been established. Therefore, we are going to analyze the treatment outcome with the various procedure through the literature review and determine the efficacy of ACDF.

ACDF Using the Solis Cage with Iliac Bone Graft in Single Level: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Average 36 months Follow-up

Objective

To evaluate the utility of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage and autograft through long term(average 36 months) follow-up.

Methods

Thirty selected patients (male:20/female:10) who suffered from cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy or radiculomyelopathy underwent a single level ACDF with PEEK cage and autograft from iliac crest from March 2006 to July 2008 in single institute. We followed patients for an average 36.4±8.1 months (ranged from 23 to 49 months). The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score for evaluation of myelopathy and visual analogue scale (VAS) for radiating pain was used to estimate postoperative clinical outcome. Plain x-ray on true lateral standing flexion, extension and neutral position view and 3D CT scan were used every 6 months after surgery during follow-up period.

Results

The mean VAS and JOA scoring improved significantly after the surgery and radiological fusion rate was accomplished by 100% 36 months after the surgery. We had no complication related with the surgery except one case of osteomyelitis. There was one case of Grade I fusion, four cases of grade II, and 25 cases of grade III by radiologic evaluation.

Conclusion

This long term follow-up study for ACDF with PEEK cage shows that this surgical method is comparable with other anterior cervical fusion methods in terms of clinical outcomes and radiologic fusion rate.

Late infection from anterior cervical discectomy and fusion after twenty years

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been performed for degenerative and traumatic cervical diseases to improve pain and neurologic symptoms including sensory change and motor weakness. Infection, however, is a rare complication of ACDF, and late infection is even much rarer. We present a case of late Infection from ACDF C4-5 using Biocompatible Osteoconductive Polymer (BOP) after twenty years in the absence of an esophageal perforation, Zenker's diverticulum, or recent surgery or bacteremia. Late infection from ACDF after 20 years is extremely rare in the literature. However, possibility of such a late complication should be appreciated during the follow-up period and surgical resection will be required for proper treatment.

Cervical radiculopathy: a review

BACKGROUND

Cervical radiculopathy is defined as a syndrome of pain and/or sensorimotor deficits due to compression of a cervical nerve root. Understanding of this disease is vital for rapid diagnosis and treatment of patients with this condition, facilitating their recovery and return to regular activity.

PURPOSE

This review is designed to clarify (1) the pathophysiology that leads to nerve root compression; (2) the diagnosis of the disease guided by history, physical exam, imaging, and electrophysiology; and (3) operative and non-operative options for treatment and how these should be applied.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for relevant articles and these articles were reviewed by independent authors. The conclusions are presented in this manuscript.

RESULTS

Facet joint spondylosis and herniation of the intervertebral disc are the most common causes of nerve root compression. The clinical consequence of radiculopathy is arm pain or paresthesias in the dermatomal distribution of the affected nerve and may or may not be associated with neck pain and motor weakness. Patient history and clinical examination are important for diagnosis. Further imaging modalities, such as x-ray, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and electrophysiologic testing, are of importance. Most patients will significantly improve from non-surgical active and passive therapies. Indicated for surgery are patients with clinically significant motor deficits, debilitating pain that is resistant to conservative modalities and/or time, or instability in the setting of disabling radiculopathy. Surgical treatment options include anterior cervical decompression with fusion and posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment indications, and treatment techniques is essential for rapid diagnosis and care of patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Complications following autologous bone graft harvesting from the iliac crest and using the RIA: a systematic review

Bone grafting is a commonly performed surgical procedure to augment bone regeneration in a variety of cases in orthopaedic and maxillofacial surgery. Autologous bone graft remains to be the 'gold standard' and the iliac crest to be the most common harvesting site. The intramedullary canal of long bones represents another potential site for large volume of autologous bone graft harvesting and is recently being used as an alternative donor site. However, harvesting of autologous bone graft is associated with morbidity and a number of complications. The aim of this systematic review was to collect and summarise the existing data on reported complications after harvesting autologous bone from the iliac crest (anterior and posterior) and the long bone intramedullary canal using the RIA device. We searched the PubMed Medline and Ovid Medline databases, from January 1990 to October 2010, to retrieve all relevant articles. A total of 92 articles (6682 patients) were included in the analysis. Overall, the complication rate following RIA was 6% (14 complications in 233 patients) and 19.37% after iliac crest bone graft harvesting (1249 complications in 6449 patients). The rate of each of the reported complications was assessed and, when the donor site was properly documented, comparison within the anterior and posterior iliac crest donor sites was performed. Although the difference of the overall morbidity rates between the two harvesting sites was not statistically significant (p=0.71); the rates of certain complications were found to significantly differ when anterior or posterior iliac crest was used. The rates of infection (p=0.016), haematoma formation (p=0.002), fracture (p=0.017), and hyperthrophic scar (p=0.017) were significantly higher when the donor site was the anterior iliac crest compared to the posterior iliac crest; whereas the rates of chronic donor site pain (p=0.004) and sensory disturbances (p=0.003) were significantly lower. The incidence of bone graft harvesting related complications can be reduced further if certain principles are followed depending on the performed harvesting methods; but overall the use of RIA device as harvesting method seems a promising alternative with a low complication rate.

Systematic review of anterior interbody fusion techniques for single- and double-level cervical degenerative disc disease

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE

To determine which technique of anterior cervical interbody fusion (ACIF) gives the best outcome in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The number of surgical techniques for decompression and ACIF as treatment for cervical degenerative disc disease has increased rapidly, but the rationale for the choice between different techniques remains unclear.

METHODS

From a comprehensive search, we selected randomized studies that compared anterior cervical decompression and ACIF techniques, in patients with chronic single- or double-level degenerative disc disease or disc herniation. Risk of bias was assessed using the criteria of the Cochrane back review group.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies with 2267 patients were included. The major treatments were discectomy alone and addition of an ACIF procedure (graft, cement, cage, and plates). At best, there was very low-quality evidence of little or no difference in pain relief between the techniques. We found moderate quality evidence for few secondary outcomes. Odom's criteria were not different between iliac crest autograft and a metal cage (risk ratio [RR]: 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99-1.24). Bone graft produced more fusion than discectomy (RR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.17-0.48). Complication rates were not different between discectomy and iliac crest autograft (RR: 1.56; 95% CI: 0.71-3.43). Low-quality evidence was found that iliac crest autograft results in better fusion than a cage (RR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.10-3.17); but more complications (RR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.12-0.92).

CONCLUSION

When fusion of the motion segment is considered to be the working mechanism for pain relief and functional improvement, iliac crest autograft appears to be the golden standard. When ignoring fusion rates and looking at complication rates, a cage as a golden standard has a weak evidence base over iliac crest autograft, but not over discectomy.

Single or double-level anterior interbody fusion techniques for cervical degenerative disc disease

BACKGROUND

The number of surgical techniques for decompression and solid interbody fusion as treatment for cervical spondylosis has increased rapidly, but the rationale for the choice between different techniques remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine which technique of anterior interbody fusion gives the best clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with single- or double-level degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2009, issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2009), EMBASE (1980 to May 2009), BIOSIS (2004 to May 2009), and references of selected articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised comparative studies that compared anterior cervical decompression and interbody fusion techniques for participants with chronic degenerative disc disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Back Review Group criteria. Data on demographics, intervention details and outcome measures were extracted onto a pre-tested data extraction form.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-three small studies ( 2267 patients) compared different fusion techniques. The major treatments were discectomy alone, addition of an interbody fusion procedure (autograft, allograft, cement, or cage), and addition of anterior plates. Eight studies had a low risk of bias. Few studies reported on pain, therefore, at best, there was very low quality evidence of little or no difference in pain relief between the different techniques. We found moderate quality evidence for these secondary outcomes: no statistically significant difference in Odom's criteria between iliac crest autograft and a metal cage (6 studies, RR 1.11 (95% CI 0.99 to1.24)); bone graft produced more effective fusion than discectomy alone (5 studies, RR 0.22 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.48)); no statistically significant difference in complication rates between discectomy alone and iliac crest autograft (7 studies, RR 1.56 (95% CI 0.71 to 3.43)); and low quality evidence that iliac crest autograft results in better fusion than a cage (5 studies, RR 1.87 (95% CI 1.10 to 3.17)); but more complications (7 studies, RR 0.33 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.92)).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When the working mechanism for pain relief and functional improvement is fusion of the motion segment, there is low quality evidence that iliac crest autograft appears to be the better technique. When ignoring fusion rates and looking at complication rates, a cage has a weak evidence base over iliac crest autograft, but not over discectomy alone. Future research should compare additional instrumentation such as screws, plates, and cages against discectomy with or without autograft.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of anterior cervical interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite spacer

OBJECTIVE

This is retrospective study of clinical and radiological outcomes of anterior cervical fusion using Bongros-HA (BioAlpha, Seongnam, Korea) which is a type of synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA) spacer to evaluate the efficacy in its clinical application and usefulness as a reliable alternative to autograft bone.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in this study and 40 segments were involved. All patients were performed anterior cervical interbody fusion using HA spacer and plating system. Indications for surgery were radiculopathy caused by soft-disc herniation or spondylosis in 18 patients, spondylotic myelopathy in 1 patient, and spinal trauma in 10 patients. Cervical spine radiographs were obtained on postoperative 1day, 1week, and then at 1, 2, 6, and 12 months in all patients to evaluate intervertebral disc height, and the degrees of lordosis. Cervical computed tomography was done at postoperative 12 month in all patients to confirm the fusion status. The mean period of clinical follow-up was 17 months.

RESULTS

Complete interbody fusion was achieved in 100% of patients. Preoperative kyphotic deformities were corrected in all cases after surgery. Intervertebral disc height was well maintained during follow up period. There were no cases of graft extrusion, graft deterioration and graft fracture.

CONCLUSION

HA spacer is very efficient in achieving cervical fusion, maintaining intervertebral disc height, and restoring lordosis. When combined with the placement of a cervical plate, immediate stability can be achieved and graft related complication can be prevented.

Techniques for cervical interbody grafting

Object

The objective of this systematic review was to use evidence-based medicine to determine the efficacy of interbody graft techniques.

Methods

The National Library of Medicine and Cochrane Database were queried using MeSH headings and keywords relevant to cervical interbody grafting. Abstracts were reviewed and studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. The guidelines group assembled an evidentiary table summarizing the quality of evidence (Classes I–III). Disagreements regarding the level of evidence were resolved through an expert consensus conference. The group formulated recommendations that contained the degree of strength based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines network. Validation was done through peer review by the Joint Guidelines Committee of the American Association of Neurological Surgerons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Results

Autograft bone harvested from the iliac crest, allograft bone from either cadaveric iliac crest or fibula, or titanium cages and rectangular fusion devices, with or without the use of autologous graft or substitute, have been successful in creating arthrodesis after 1- or 2-level anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (Class II). Alternatives to autograft, allograft, or titanium cages include polyetheretherketone cages and carbon fiber cages (Class III). Polyetheretherketone cages have been used successfully with or without hydroxyapatite for anterior cervical discectomy with fusion. Importantly, recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 carries a complication rate of up to 23–27% (especially local edema) compared with 3% for a standard approach.

Conclusions

Current evidence does not support the routine use of interbody grafting for cervical arthrodesis. Multiple strategies for interbody grafting have been successful with Class II evidence supporting the use of autograft, allograft, and titanium cages.

Bone graft substitutes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion is a common surgical procedure for patients suffering pain and/or neurological deficits and unresponsive to conservative management. For decades, autologous bone grafted from the iliac crest has been used as a substrate for cervical arthrodesis. However patient dissatisfaction with donor site morbidity has led to the search for alternative techniques. We present a literature review examining the progress of available grafting options as assessed in human clinical trials, considering allograft-based, synthetic, factor- and cell-based technologies.

Diagnosing cervical fusion: a comprehensive literature review

Study Design

Comprehensive literature review.

Purpose

To document the criteria for fusion utilized in these studies to determine if a consensus on the definition of a solid fusion exists.

Overview of Literature

Numerous studies have reported on fusion rates following anterior cervical arthrodesis. There is a wide discrepancy in the fusion rates in these studies. While factors such as graft type, Instrumentation, and technique play a factor in fusion rate, another reason for the difference may be a result of differences in the definition of fusion following anterior cervical spine surgery.

Methods

A comprehensive English Medline literature review from 1966 to 2004 using the key words "anterior," "cervical," and "fusion" was performed. We divided these into two groups: newer studies done between 2000 and 2004, and earlier studies done between 1966 and 2000. These articles were then analyzed for the number of patients, follow-up period, graft type, and levels fused. Moreover, all of the articles were examined for their definition of fusion along with their fusion rate.

Results

In the earlier studies from 1966 to 2000, there was no consensus for what constituted a solid fusion. Only fifteen percent of these studies employed the most stringent definition of a solid fusion which was the presence of bridging bone and the absence of motion on flexion and extension radiographs. On the other hand, the later studies (2000 to 2004) used such a definition a majority (63%) of the time, suggesting that a consensus opinion for the definition of fusion is beginning to form.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that over the past several years, a consensus definition of fusion is beginning to form. However, a large percentage of studies are still being published without using stringent fusion criteria. To that end, we recommend that all studies reporting on fusion rates use the most stringent criteria for solid fusion following anterior cervical spine surgery: the absence of motion on flexion/extension views and presence of bridging trabeculae on lateral x-rays. We believe that a universal adoption of such uniform criteria will help to standardize such studies and make it more possible to compare one study with another.

Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: 12-month clinical outcome

A prospective observational clinical study was carried out to determine whether Bryan disc replacement surgery is a suitable alternative to arthrodesis for cervical disc disease.

Long-term outcome after anterior cervical discectomy without fusion

To retrospectively study the long-term outcome of patients after anterior cervical discectomy without fusion (ACD) compared to results published on the long-term outcome after ACD with fusion (ACDF). We reviewed the charts of all patients receiving ACD surgery between 1985 and 2000 to analyze the direct post-operative results as well as complications of the surgery. Moreover, 102 patients, randomly selected, were interviewed with the neck disability index to study possible persisting complaints up to 18 years after ACD surgery. A total of 551 Patients were identified. Two months post-operative follow up at the outpatient clinic revealed that 90.1% of patients were satisfied with the result of ACD surgery. At the time of the survey, this percentage had dropped to 67.6%. In addition, 20.6% and 11.8% had obtained moderate to severe complaints, respectively, in daily-life activities. Complaints were mainly localized in the neck region and occasionally provoked radiating pain in the arm. On the short term, ACD leads to a satisfied outcome. Over the longer term, patients report increasing complaints. The increase in complaints at the time of the survey may be the result of ongoing degenerative effects. Compared to published data on ACDF, there is no superiority of any fusion technique compared to ACD alone.

Kyphosis One Level Above the Cervical Disc Disease

If present, kyphotic angulation is generally at the level of the cervical disc disease (CDD) in the neck, but sometimes occurs at one level above the CDD. We name this situation as kyphosis one level above (KOLA). KOLA CDD has not been studied previously. In this study, we present 18 patients who had KOLA among 147 patients operated for CDD over a 5-year period. Seven of these 18 patients also received surgery for their KOLA. As new, surgical treatment of kyphotic level was performed with plating and without bony fusion in 5 patients. Clinical outcomes (according to Odom's criteria) and kyphotic corrections of KOLA patients receiving and not receiving surgery for their kyphosis during were compared. The 7 KOLA patients having surgery to correct the kyphosis had a mean 20.14+/-3.13 degrees correction in their kyphosis (from mean 12.85 to -7.28 degrees), whereas the 11 patients undergoing surgery only for CDD showed only a mean 3.00+/-2.52 degrees correction (from mean 7.45 to 4.45 degrees). When kyphotic corrections were compared, statistically significant difference was found between 2 groups (P<0.01). Clinical outcome scores showed a trend towards improvement in the patients operated upon for kyphosis correction. KOLA may be a factor in the development of cervical disc herniation and spondylosis, and should be treated if more than 11 degrees. In cervical region, upper adjacent level disease may be an extension of KOLA. Larger studies can further define the relationship between KOLA and CDD, and indications for surgical correction of KOLA.

Comparison of multisegment anterior cervical fixation using bone strut graft versus a titanium rod and buttress prosthesis: analysis of outcome with long-term follow-up and interview by independent physician

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study of 73 consecutive patients who underwent cervical corpectomy and anterior strut fixation over 3 or more disc levels between July 1989 and May 1999.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of cervical spine fixation by autologous strut graft from iliac crest or fibula versus a titanium prosthesis without bone graft.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Strut grafting after multilevel anterior cervical corpectomy remains a challenging procedure, with published dislocation rates from 0% to 71%, and nonunion from 0% to 54%. This paper describes a quicker and easier alternative to the use of a bone strut, imparting a very high degree of immediate spinal stability, and osseous integration equivalent to bone fusion.

METHODS

Thirty-eight bone-graft operations and 38 titanium prosthesis operations were performed on 73 patients between July 24, 1989 and May 20, 1999. Average follow-up was 53.2 months (range 19.8-134).

RESULTS

The group of patients who received the prosthesis was significantly older than the bone-grafted group and required significantly more segments excised, but operation times were significantly shorter than for the bone strut operation. The titanium prosthesis had a lower incidence of dislodgement in the early postoperative period (1/38 vs. 4/38 for bone struts) but a higher rate of late reoperation (4/38 vs. 1/38 for bone struts). The SF-36 scores in the domain of Physical Function (only) were significantly higher in the bone-grafted group (P = 0.016, Mann Whitney), consistent with the difference in mean ages of the 2 groups. The groups were indistinguishable by Odom criteria, patient verdict, pain scores, analgesic intake, length of hospital stay, radiologic fusion rate, and residual symptoms.

CONCLUSION

A titanium rod and buttress prosthesis may be a faster and easier alternative to conventional iliac crest/fibula autograft after multisegmental cervical vertebral corpectomy.

Implantation of an empty carbon fiber cage or a tricortical iliac crest autograft after cervical discectomy for single-level disc herniation: a prospective comparative study

Object

The authors conducted a study to evaluate and compare prospectively the implantation of either an empty carbon fiber composite frame cage (CFCFC) or an iliac crest autograft after anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) for cervical disc herniation with monoradiculopathy.

Methods

Thirty-six consecutive patients with one-level radiculopathy due to single-level cervical disc herniation were treated by ACD, and implantation of either an empty CFCFC (24 patients) or an iliac crest autograft (12 patients). Radiological and clinical assessments were performed preoperatively, immediately postoperatively; and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Fusion, at the 12-month follow-up examination was demonstrated in 96% of the patients in the cage group and in 100% of those in the autograft group. The mean anterior intervertebral body height was 3.7 mm preoperatively and 3.9 mm at 12 months in the CFCFC, and 4.1 and 3.8 mm, respectively, in the autograft group. In cage-treated patients, neck pain, as measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) (Score 0 = minimum; 10 = maximum) decreased from 6.4 preoperatively to 2.0 at 12 months, and radicular pain, decreased from 8.4 preoperatively to 1.5 at 12 months. In the autograft group, neck pain changed from a mean preoperative VAS score of 7.2 to 2.5 at 12 months, and radicular pain decreased from a preoperative mean of 7.8 to 1.4 at 12 months. Analysis of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey domains and the Oswestry Disability Index scores indicated a significant improvement in both the Physical and Mental Component Summary domains in both groups.

Conclusions

Implantation of an empty CFCFC or a tricortical iliac crest autograft after ACD are safe and reliable options for the treatment of cervical disc herniation causing one-sided radiculopathy. Both procedures produced equally satisfying clinical and radiological results, leading to a high fusion rate and maintaining intervertebral height. Implantation of an empty CFCFC has the advantages of avoiding any donor site morbidity and requiring a significantly shorter operative time.

Anterior cervical fusion with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the treatment of degenerative disc disease. Preliminary observations in 36 consecutive cases with a minimum 12-month follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of 36 cases of degenerative disc disease treated by interbody fusion with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and efficiency of PEEK cages for anterior cervical fusion (ACF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

ACF with autologous bone has been reported since over 50 years ago. The recent development of cages housing materials inducing osteogenesis simplifies the technique of interbody fusion. The main purposes of bone substitutes for ACF are immediate biomechanical support, osteo-integration of the graft, and elimination of local side effects at the donor site. This report shows our results using PEEK cages.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During an 18-month period, 36 consecutive patients had cervical fusions at 43 levels between C3 and C7. All operations involved one or two disc spaces for degenerative disc disease. We implanted all disc spaces with PEEK cages (Stryker Corporation, Kalamazoo, MI) containing granulated coralline hydroxylapatite (Pro-Osteon 200, Interpore Cross International, Irvine, CA) or deantigenated pig bone in a gel solution (Gen-Os, Tecnoss, Torino, Italy).

RESULTS

About 97% of patients had a good to excellent outcome; the result in one myelopathic patient was fair. The cervical fusion rate was 16.7% at 3 months, 61.1% at 6 months, and 100% at one year.

CONCLUSIONS

PEEK cages appear to be safe and efficient for ACF. In order to confirm our preliminary impressions studies on larger series with long term follow-up are warranted.

[Cervical disc prostheses]

Endoprosthetic replacement for spinal cord disorders represents an attractive alternative to fusion in those cases where surgery appears necessary for degenerative disc disease. At least in theory it has been proven that placement of an endoprosthesis minimizes undue stress on the adjoining segments and its possible negative consequences. Furthermore, cervical endoprostheses facilitate speedier rehabilitation and the problems involved in removal of the bone chip become irrelevant. Clinical results reported to date for the cervical spine are very encouraging and indicate that endoprosthetic replacement has been quite successful particularly for difficulties in multilevel approaches. However, long-term results for cervical endoprostheses have not yet been published and therefore at present there are no reference values for the viability of the prosthesis with regard to the aseptic loosening rate. There are also no findings available on how the implanted cervical prosthesis will behave when bone quality diminishes at an advanced age.

A prospective randomized comparison of rectangular titanium cage fusion and iliac crest autograft fusion in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy

Object

The authors compare clinical outcome and fusion rates after iliac crest autograft (ICAG)– and rectangular titanium cage (RTC)–augmented fusion in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy (ACD).

Methods

One hundred consecutive patients with 127 levels of cervical disc disease refractory to conservative treatment were randomized into one of the two treatment groups (ICAG/RTC fusion). The visual analog scale was used by the patient to rate overall pain and head, neck, arm, and donor site pain separately. Myelopathy was documented according to Japanese Orthopaedic Association and Nurick grading systems. Outcome was analyzed using Odom criteria, the 36-Item Short Form (SF-36), and Patient Satisfaction Index scales. Fusion rates were assessed on standard and flexion–extension radiographs. Follow-up data of at least 12 months' duration were available for 95 patients.

More residual overall pain after 12 months was documented in patients who underwent ICAG fusion (3.3 ± 2.5 [ICAG] and 2.2 ± 2.4 [RTC]; p < 0.05). Although arm and head pain were minimal in both groups, neck pain proved to be the predominant symptom (2.7 ± 2.5 [ICAG] and 1.9 ± 2.1 [RTC]), which resolved in only 67 and 48% of RTC-and ICAG-treated patients, respectively (p < 0.05). Myelopathy improved comparably in both groups. Regardless of increased pain in ICAG-treated patients, PSI and SF-36 scores were not significantly different between groups (only four [8%] of 47 ICAG-treated patients and five [10%] of 48 RTC-treated patients were unsatisfied). Good to excellent functional recovery according to Odom criteria was observed in 75 and 79% of ICAG- and RTC-treated patients, respectively. Fusion rates were 81 and 74%, respectively (p = 0.51).

Conclusions

Fusion rates and clinical outcome at 12 months after ACD were comparable between patients who underwent ICAG and RTC fusion. The use of rectangular cages, however, avoids donor site morbidity and reduces overall pain and, thus, seems to be an advantageous treatment alternative.

The Bryan cervical disc prosthesis as an alternative to arthrodesis in the treatment of cervical spondylosis: 46 consecutive cases

We present data relating to the Bryan disc arthroplasty for the treatment of cervical spondylosis in 46 patients. Patients with either radiculopathy or myelopathy had a cervical discectomy followed by implantation of a cervical disc prosthesis. Patients were reviewed at six weeks, six months and one year and assessment included three outcome measures, a visual analogue scale (VAS), the short form 36 (SF-36) and the neck disability index (NDI). The results were categorised according to a modification of Odom's criteria. Radiological evaluation, by an independent radiologist, sought evidence of movement, stability and subsidence of the prosthesis.A highly significant difference was found for all three outcome measurements, comparing the pre-operative with the post-operative values: VAS (Z = 6.42, p < 0.0001), SF-36 (mental component) (Z = -5.02, p < 0.0001), SF-36 (physical component) (Z = -5.00, p < 0.0001) and NDI (Z = 7.03, p < 0.0001). The Bryan cervical disc prosthesis seems reliable and safe in the treatment of patients with cervical spondylosis.

Maintenance of interbody space in one- and two-level anterior cervical interbody fusion: comparison of the effectiveness of autograft, allograft, and cage

The use of allografts, autologous iliac crest grafts, and cages for anterior cervical fusion is well documented, however there is no comparison regarding the effectiveness of maintaining the interbody space with the three approaches. We retrospectively measured the rate and amount of interspace collapse, segmental sagittal angulations, clinical results, and radiographic fusion success rates to determine which is the best fusion material. We assessed 73 patients who had one- and two-level cervical discectomies and interbody fusions without instrumentation. The three groups had similar clinical results and fusion rates. However, in the autograft group union occurred in 4 months. In the allograft group, union did not occur until 5.54 months. Moreover, the loss of cervical lordosis (2.75 degrees) was less in the cage group than in the allograft group (9.23 degrees). Additionally, the anterior interspace collapse (1.73 mm) in the cage group was less than the collapse recorded in the autograft group (2.82 mm) and in the allograft group (4 mm). An interspace collapse of 3 mm or greater was observed in 56.1% of the patients in the allograft group, compared with only 19% of the patients in the cage group. We showed that the cage is superior to the allograft and autograft in maintaining cervical interspace height and cervical lordosis after one-level and two-level anterior cervical decompression procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level III-2 (retrospective cohort study).

Integrated outcome assessment after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: myelocompression but not adjacent instability affect patient-reported quality of life and cervical spine symptoms

STUDY DESIGN

The authors conducted a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE

Integrated assessment of adjacent instability (AI), myelocompression (MC), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signs of myelopathy (MRISM), physician-assessed clinical signs and symptoms, including clinical signs of myelopathy (CSM), patients' self-reported symptoms and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients who had ACDF between 1986 and 1995 received MRI scans, conventional and flexion/extension radiographs to assess myelocompression, MRISM, fusion, and AI. Clinical outcome was assessed using signs and symptoms based on selected items of Odom's criteria, Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire, and the neck disability index. Patients reported their quality of life (QL) on a standardized instrument (Profiles of QL of Chronically Ill [PLC]) and by a specific validated Cervical Spine Symptom Scale (CSSS).

RESULTS

Myelocompression was found more frequently than expected (24%). MRISM were seen in 2 patients (4%). One of the 2 patients developed CSM. Fusion was achieved in 94% (with kyphosis in 17%). AI was found in 30%. However, only myelocompression but not AI was associated with statistically significant decreases in most QL scores (i.e., everyday capabilities, positive mood) and high cervical spine symptom burden (all P's < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The study results underline the need for a better understanding of the biomechanical changes in the adjacent unfused segments. Consensus is needed on postoperative follow-up guidelines, including pain management strategies. Future studies on the outcome of ACDF will profit from an integrated outcome approach, including assessments based on imaging, physicians, and patients.

Single or double-level anterior interbody fusion techniques for cervical degenerative disc disease

BACKGROUND

The number of surgical techniques for decompression and solid interbody fusion as a treatment for cervical spondylosis has increased rapidly, but the rationale for the choice between different techniques is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to determine which method of anterior cervical interbody fusion at a single or double-level provides the best clinical and radiological outcome in patients with degenerative disc disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were identified with a computer-assisted search of electronic databases in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to 2004), EMBASE (1980 to 2004), and Current Contents (1996 to 2004). We also searched references of selected articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

With the aid of a checklist, two reviewers independently screened the identified references. Consensus was reached through negotiation. A third reviewer was consulted if consensus could not be reached. Inclusion criteria included: articles were reports of randomised comparative studies; treatments compared anterior cervical decompression and interbody fusion techniques, participants were individuals scheduled for surgery for a chronic (longer than 12 weeks) diagnosis of degenerative disc disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Methodological quality was assessed independently by two reviewers, using the van Tulder list of criteria. With the aid of a data extraction form, data was extracted independently by two reviewers on group characteristics, intervention details and outcome measures.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 939 patients evaluated three comparisons of different fusion techniques. From these comparisons it appears that discectomy alone has a shorter operation time, hospital stay, and post-operative absence from work than discectomy with fusion, while there is no statistical difference for pain relief and rate of fusion. It also appears that fusion techniques that use autograft give a better chance for fusion than interbody fusion techniques that use a cage, but other outcome variables could not be combined.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

The low quality of the trials prohibits extensive conclusions from this review. More studies with better methodology and reporting are needed. There should be a more general agreement between researchers on which outcome parameters should be used in the evaluation of anterior cervical fusion procedures.

Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, concurrently enrolled, multicenter trials of the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN) were conducted for the treatment of patients with single-level and two-level (bi-level) degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine.

OBJECTIVES

The studies were designed to determine whether new functional intervertebral cervical disc prosthesis can provide relief from objective neurologic symptoms and signs, improve the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living, decrease pain, and maintain stability and segmental motion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The concept of accelerated degeneration of adjacent disc levels as a consequence of increased stress caused by interbody fusion of the cervical spine has been widely postulated. Therefore, reconstruction of a failed intervertebral disc with functional disc prosthesis should offer the same benefits as fusion while simultaneously providing motion and thereby protecting the adjacent level discs from the abnormal stresses associated with fusion.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy underwent implantation with the Bryan prosthesis after a standard anterior cervical discectomy. At scheduled follow-up periods, the effectiveness of the device was characterized by evaluating each patient's pain, neurologic function, and radiographically measured range of motion at the implanted level.

RESULTS

Clinical success for both studies exceeded the study acceptance criteria of 85%. At 1-year follow-up, the flexion-extension range of motion per level: Discectomy and implantation of the device alleviates neurologic symptoms and signs similar to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Radiographic evidence supports maintenance of motion. The procedure is safe and the patients recover quickly. At least 5 years of follow-up will be needed to assess the long-term functionality of the prosthesis and protective influence on adjacent levels.

Implantation of an empty carbon fiber composite frame cage after single-level anterior cervical discectomy in the treatment of cervical disc herniation: preliminary results

OBJECT

The authors sought to evaluate retrospectively the radiological and clinical outcome of anterior cervical discectomy followed by implantation of an empty carbon fiber composite frame cage (CFCF) in the treatment of patients with cervical disc herniation and monoradiculopathy.

METHODS

Twenty-five consecutive patients (12 men, 13 women, mean age 45 years) with monoradiculopathy due to cervical disc herniation were treated by anterior cervical discectomy followed by implantation of an empty CFCF cage. On lateral flexion-extension radiographs segmental stability at a mean follow up of 14 months (range 5-31 months) was demonstrated in all 25 patients, and bone fusion was documented in 24 of 25 patients. The mean anterior intervertebral body height was 3.4 mm preoperatively and 3.8 mm at follow up in 20 patients. In these patients the mean segmental angle (angle between lower endplate of lower and upper vertebra) was 0.9 degrees preoperatively and 3.1 degrees at follow up. In the remaining five patients preoperative images were not retrievable. Self-scored neck pain based on a visual analog scale (1, minimum; 10, maximum) changed from a preoperative average of 5.6 to an average of 2 at follow up; radicular pain was reduced from 7.7 to 2.1 postoperatively. Analysis of the SF12 questionnaires showed a significant improvement in both the physical capacity score (preoperative mean 32.4 points; follow up 46 points) and the mental capacity score (preoperative mean 45.8 points; follow up 57.5 points).

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of an empty CFCF cage in the treatment of cervical disc herniation and monoradiculopathy avoids donor site morbidity associated with autologous bone grafting as well as the use of any supplementary material inside the cage. Restoration or maintenance of intervertebral height and thus segmental lordosis and a very high rate of segmental stability and fusion are achieved using this technique.

Anterior cervical fusion: a comparison of cage, dowel and dowel-plate constructs

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Threaded lumbar cages have been used as a safe and effective surgical fusion method for a decade. Smaller versions have now been developed for the cervical spine to obviate the need for allograft use or iliac autograft harvest and to provide initial stability before fusion.

PURPOSE

To compare anterior cervical interbody fusion with the BAK/C Cervical Interbody Fusion System, cage (Centerpulse Spine-Tech Inc., Minneapolis, MN), conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and plate constructs (anterior cervical locking plates).

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Radiological and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent cervical fusion with the BAK/C (filled with local autograft reamings) are compared with ACDF and plate fusion constructs (anterior cervical locking plates). One surgeon performed 88 fusions: BAK/C (n=30), ACDF (n=32), plate (n=26). There were 43 one-level and 45 two-level fusions from C3-C4 to C7-T1.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The patients represented a wide range of diagnoses as indications for cervical fusion. Patients (n=88) were 40 men (45%) and 48 women (55%) with a mean age of 51 years (range, 30 to 70 years). Thirty-five percent of patients were smokers, and 26% had known workers' or other compensation issues.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Hospital records were examined for data from operative reports and discharge summaries. An independent spine radiologist performed a radiological review of cervical flexion and extension films, noting fusion status, graft position and cage subsidence. Short Form (SF)-36 inventories for physical/mental functioning and visual analog scales (VAS) for pain were administered.

METHODS

A retrospective clinical and radiological review was performed. Hospital and clinic chart data, flexion-extension X-rays and self-assessments (SF-36, VAS) were evaluated. Follow-up at X-ray was 2.4 years (range, 1.0 to 5.5 years).

RESULTS

Iliac crest harvesting was least likely for BAK/C patients (2 of 30; 6.7%) compared with ACDF (30 of 32; 93.8%) and plate patients (13 of 26; 50.0%; p<.0001). Plate surgeries took longest (3.5 hours), followed by ACDF (2.3 hours) and BAK/C (2.2 hours; p<.0001). Blood loss was greatest for plate procedures (289 cc), followed by BAK/C (142 cc) and ACDF (121 cc; p<.01). No BAK/C patient stayed in the hospital more than 1 day; ACDF, 1 to 2 days; plate, 1 to 5 days (p<.02). BAK/C patients were most likely to have a successful fusion: BAK/C, 29 of 30, 97%; ACDF, 26 of 31, 84% (one X-ray fusion status indeterminate); plate, 22 of 26, 85% (p<.0585). No BAK/C patient experienced prolonged donor-site pain (0%) compared with ACDF (25.0%) and plate (23.0%) patients. SF-36 and VAS scores, influenced by compensation, were comparable for all groups. Revisions were as follows: ACDF, 4 of 32, 13%; plate, 2 of 26, 8%); BAK/C, 1 of 30, 3%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the BAK/C cage group had the lowest graft requirements/risks, generally required fewer hospital resources, achieved similar patient outcomes and fused at a higher rate than ACDF and plate groups.

A prospective randomized comparison of coralline hydroxyapatite with autograft in cervical interbody fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized trial with independent clinical and radiographic outcome review of patients receiving either hydroxyapatite or tricortical iliac crest graft for cervical interbody fusion was conducted.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether coralline-derived hydroxyapatite is a suitable bone graft substitute in cervical interbody fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Tricortical iliac crest bone is the "gold standard" graft material for cervical interbody fusion. Various bone substitutes have been used for this procedure to avoid potential donor site morbidity. ProOsteon 200 is a coralline-derived hydroxyapatite product, the use of which remains unclear for cervical interbody fusion.

METHODS

In this study, 29 patients undergoing anterior cervical fusion and plating were randomized to receive either ProOsteon 200 or iliac crest grafts. The SF-36 and Oswestry Disability Index were used to measure clinical outcome. Postoperative radiographs were analyzed for graft fragmentation, loss of height, angular alignment, and hardware failure to assess structural integrity of the graft material. Plain radiographs and computed tomography scans were used to evaluate fusion.

RESULTS

Both the ProOsteon 200 and iliac crest groups demonstrated significant improvement in clinical outcome scores. There was no significant difference in clinical outcome or fusion rates between the two groups. Graft fragmentation occurred in 89% of the hydroxyapatite grafts and 11% of the autografts (P = 0.001). Significant graft settling occurred in 50% of the hydroxyapatite grafts, as compared with 11% of the autografts (P = 0. 009). One patient in the ProOsteon 200 group required revision surgery for graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

ProOsteon 200 does not possess adequate structural integrity to resist axial loading and maintain disc height or segmental lordosis during cervical interbody fusion.

Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis

OBJECTIVE

The concept of accelerated degeneration of adjacent disc levels as a consequence of increased stress caused by interbody fusion of the cervical spine has been widely postulated. Therefore, reconstruction of a failed intervertebral disc with a functional disc prosthesis should offer the same benefits as fusion while simultaneously providing motion and thereby protecting the adjacent level discs from the abnormal stresses associated with fusion. This study was designed to determine whether a new, functional intervertebral cervical disc prosthesis can provide relief from objective neurological symptoms and signs, improve the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living, decrease pain, and provide stability and normal range of motion.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, concurrently enrolled, multicenter trial of the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis (Spinal Dynamics Corp., Mercer Island, WA) for the treatment of patients with single-level degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. Patients with symptomatic cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy underwent implantation with the Bryan prosthesis after a standard anterior cervical discectomy. At scheduled follow-up periods, the effectiveness of the device was characterized by evaluating each patient's pain, neurological function, and range of motion at the implanted level.

RESULTS

Analysis included data regarding 60 patients at 6 months with 30 of those patients at 1 year. Clinical success at 6 months and 1 year after implantation was 86 and 90%, respectively, exceeding the study's acceptance criteria of 85%. These results compare favorably with the short-term clinical outcomes associated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion reported in the literature. At 1 year, there was no measurable subsidence of the devices (based on a measurement detection threshold of 2 mm). Evidence of anterior and/or posterior device migration was detected in one patient and suspected in a second patient. There was no evidence of spondylotic bridging at the implanted disc space. The measured range of motion in flexion-extension, as determined by an independent radiologist, ranged from 1 to 21 degrees (mean range of motion, 9 +/- 5 degrees). No devices have been explanted or surgically revised.

CONCLUSION

Discectomy and implantation of the device alleviates neurological symptoms and signs similar to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Radiographic evidence supports normal range of motion. The procedure is safe and the patients recover quickly. Restrictive postoperative management is not necessary. However, only after long-term follow-up of at least 5 years will it become clear whether the device remains functional, thus confirming these early favorable results. In addition, the influence on adjacent motion segments can be assessed after at least 5 years of follow-up.

Anterior cervical fusion with carbon fiber cage containing coralline hydroxyapatite: preliminary observations in 45 consecutive cases of soft-disc herniation

OBJECT

The purposes of bone substitutes for anterior cervical fusion (ACF) are immediate biomechanical support and osteointegration of the graft. The authors report their preliminary results in performing ACF in which carbon fiber cages (CFCs) containing coralline hydroxyapatite (HA) are used as bone substitute.

METHODS

During a 24-month period, anterior microsurgical discectomy was performed in 45 consecutive patients for soft-disc cervical herniation. In all cases ACF was performed using a CFC containing a core of granulated coralline HA. Fifty-seven CFCs were implanted in 33 single-level and 12 two-level procedures. The mean operative time was 83 minutes for one-level and 97 minutes for two-level procedures. The mean hospital stay was 1.51 days, and there were no permanent complications. At a mean follow up of 22.3 months, the pain had decreased or disappeared in all patients, and the patients' satisfaction rate was very high. Good results were also obtained in patients who smoked cigarettes. Patients underwent radiographic evaluation at Day 1, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Implant-related complications were not observed and revision surgeries were not performed. Twelve-month cervical x-ray films demonstrated complete fusion in all cases, without evidence of breakage, collapse, pseudarthrosis, subsidence, angular deformity, or protrusion. Signs of pathological absorption and necrosis were not found in contiguous vertebral bodies, and inflammatory reactions were never seen around cages.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results suggest that implants composed of CFC containing granulated coralline HA are promising bone substitutes to be used in ACF, with a good rate of incorporation and no significant complications.

Prospective controlled study of rectangular titanium cage fusion compared with iliac crest autograft fusion in anterior cervical discectomy

Object

The complications of autogenous bone grafting compel spine surgeons to seek alternative methods for cervical spinal fusion. This prospective study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using rectangular titanium cage fusion compared with the widely performed iliac crest autograft fusion.

Methods

A total of 36 patients with cervical disc disease in whom an anterior approach was indicated for discectomy were included in this prospective controlled study. The first 18 consecutive patients received iliac crest autograft; the next 18 consecutive patients received rectangular titanium cages. The intergroup demographic and clinical data were comparable. All patients attended follow up for 1 year. According to Odom criteria, 15 (83%) of 18 patients in both groups experienced good to excellent functional recovery. According to the Patient Satisfaction Index, 17 (94%) of 18 patients in both groups were satisfied. The evaluation of neck pain and arm pain did not indicate statistically significant differences between either group. Fusion was present after 1 year in 16 (89%) of 18 patients who received iliac crest autografts and in 15 (83%) of 18 patients who received rectangular titanium cages. In the autograft group, a pseudarthrosis was present in one patient and marked hip pain was observed in three patients. In the cage group, there was one case of temporary vocal cord paresis but no implant-related complications.

Conclusions

The authors conclude that the use of titanium cages in anterior cervical discectomy constitutes a safe and efficient alternative to iliac crest bone autograft.

Anterior cervical interbody fusion with hydroxyapatite graft and plate system

Object

In cases of spondylosis or spine trauma, cervical interbody grafts are sometimes required after anterior discectomy. To avoid morbidity related to the harvesting of iliac crest bone, numerous materials have been developed such as allografts, methylmethacrylate, biocompatible osteoconductive polymer, and coralline grafts or cages. Some of these materials, however, are inefficient for fusion or are associated with specific complications. Conversely, hydroxyapatite (HA) grafts have numerous advantages. For example, their mechanical properties provide adequate load resistance and their porosity allows infiltration by newly formed bone, leading to complete fusion. The authors studied the results of using HA grafts combined with plating in patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy.

Methods

Fifty-four patients underwent 68 cervical interbody fusion procedures in which an HA graft and plating were used. Indications for surgery were radiculopathy (caused by soft-disc herniation or spondylosis) in 46 cases, spondylotic myelopathy in two cases, and spinal trauma in six cases. Postoperatively the patients were followed for a mean of 24.6 months. Patients underwent radiography to evaluate fusion, intervertebral disc height, and the degree of lordosis.

Clinically, excellent or good results (based on the Odon classification) were demonstrated in 91% of patients who presented with radiculopathy. Complete interbody fusion was achieved in 99% of all cases. Preoperative kyphotic deformities were corrected in all cases after surgery. Intervertebral disc height was maintained throughout follow up. Surgery-related morbidity was low; only one patient suffered from a permanent dysphagia. Graft deterioration was observed in 13 cases and two graft fractures occurred but without adversely affecting fusion. There were no cases of graft extrusion.

Conclusions

Hydroxyapatite grafts are very efficient in achieving cervical fusion, maintaining intervertebral disc height, and restoring lordosis. When combined with the placement of a cervical plate, immediate stability is achieved and graft displacement is prevented.

Nonautologous interbody fusion materials in cervical spine surgery: how strong is the evidence to justify their use?

STUDY DESIGN

A review of the literature concerning the use of interbody fusion devices and materials in anterior cervical surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the evidence supporting the use of interbody fusion devices as an alternative to autologous bone after anterior cervical discectomy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Concerns over the morbidity associated with harvesting autologous bone and the risk of transmissible infectious from allografts and xenografts have prompted the search for alternative methods of achieving interbody fusion. Several of these methods have been associated with an unacceptable rate of complications. The clinical and health economic implications of the widespread introduction of interbody fusion devices in the absence of sound evidence cannot be ignored.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature relating to cervical interbody fusion was undertaken. Studies were assessed critically with respect to their methodology, results, and conclusions.

RESULTS

Thirty-two clinical studies and 10 laboratory studies were analyzed. Methodologic weaknesses were identified in the majority. Only four clinical reports were either randomized or blinded or involved independent assessment of their outcomes. Fewer than half of the studies included a valid statistical analysis. Radiologic evidence of fusion was limited in many cases. There was little evidence that nonautologous fusion devices offered a reduction in the length of hospital stay. Autologous bone was as effective as, or superior to, many other fusion devices. The early results of some new fusion techniques used alone or in combination showed promise.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence supporting the use of a cervical interbody fusion device in place of autologous bone. There is a need to standardize the testing of implants with good quality laboratory work preceding clinical use. Certain devices including cages, some forms of hydroxyapatite, and bone morphogenic proteins merit further study.

Effects of neck movements on stability and subsidence in cervical interbody fusion: an in vitro study

OBJECT

The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the influence of simulated postoperative neck movements on the stabilizing effect and subsidence of four different anterior cervical interbody fusion devices. Emphasis was placed on the relation between subsidence and spinal stability.

METHODS

The flexibility of 24 human cervical spine specimens was tested before and directly after being stabilized with a WING, BAK/C, AcroMed I/F cage, or with bone cement in standard flexibility tests under 50 N axial preload. Thereafter, 700 pure moment loading cycles (+/- 2 Nm) were applied in randomized directions to simulate physiological neck movements. Additional flexibility tests in combination with measurements of the subsidence depth were conducted after 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, and 700 loading cycles. In all four groups, simulated postoperative neck movements caused an increase of the range of motion (ROM) ranging from 0.4 to 3.1 degrees and of the neutral zone from 0.1 to 4.2 degrees. This increase in flexibility was most distinct in extension followed by flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation. After cyclic loading, ROM tended to be lower in the group fitted with AcroMed cages (3.3 degrees in right lateral bending, 3.5 degrees in left axial rotation, 7.8 degrees in flexion, 8.3 degrees in extension) and in the group in which bone cement was applied (5.4 degrees, 2.5 degrees, 7.4 degrees, and 8.8 degrees, respectively) than in those fixed with the WING (6.3 degrees, 5.4 degrees, 9.7 degrees, and 6.9 degrees, respectively) and BAK cages (6.2 degrees, 4.5 degrees, 10.2 degrees, and 11.6 degrees, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Simulated repeated neck movements not only caused an increase of the flexibility but also subsidence of the implants into the adjacent vertebrae. The relation between flexibility increase and subsidence seemed to depend on the implant design: subsiding BAK/C cages partially supported stability whereas subsiding WING cages and AcroMed cages did not.

Subsidence resulting from simulated postoperative neck movements: an in vitro investigation with a new cervical fusion cage

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical in vitro subsidence test of different cervical interbody fusion devices was performed using a new testing protocol that simulates physiologic conditions.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of simulated postoperative neck movements on the subsidence of the new WING cervical interbody fusion cage in comparison with two other cages and bone cement.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical interbody fusion cages sometimes cause complications because of subsidence into the adjacent vertebrae with collapse of the intervertebral space. Complications such as cage dislocation or nonunion with instability also have been reported. To prevent such complications, the new WING cervical interbody fusion cage (Medinorm AG, Quierschied, Germany) has been developed. Its area of contact with the adjacent vertebrae is supposed to be large enough to resist excessive subsidence and small enough to prevent stress protection of the tissue growing in the cage.

METHODS

In this study, 24 human cervical spine specimens were tested after stabilization with either a WING, BAK/C, AcroMed I/F cage or bone cement. Then, in a new testing protocol, 700 pure-moment loading cycles (+/-2 Nm) were applied in randomized directions (lateral bending, flexion-extension, and axial rotation alone or in combination with each other) to simulate the patient's neck movements during the first few postoperative days. Measurements of the subsidence depth (total height loss) in combination with flexibility tests (+/-2.5 Nm) were performed before cyclic loading and after 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, and 700 loading cycles.

RESULTS

Cyclic loading caused subsidence in all four device groups, most distinct with BAK/C-cages (1.63 mm after 700 loading cycles) followed by the new WING (0.90 mm) and the AcroMed (0.82 mm) cages. No statistically significant difference could be found among the three cage designs. However, all three cage types showed a significantly higher subsidence depth than bone cement (0.48 mm;P = 0.023 between each of the three cage-types and bone cement). A moderate correlation between bone mineral density and subsidence depth could be found only in the BAK/C group (r2 = 0.495). A large subsidence depth after 700 loading cycles was associated with a large flexibility increase in the WING (r2 = 0.786) and AcroMed groups (r2 = 0.21), but with a small flexibility increase in the BAK/C group (r2 = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative neck movements caused subsidence in all cervical interbody implant types. The new WING cage and the AcroMed cage seemed to have a better resistance against subsidence than the BAK/C cage. However, all three cage types had a significantly higher subsidence tendency than bone cement.