Anatomic considerations of anterior transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability

The anatomic study and surgical technique for canal decompression with "pedicle-plasty" strategy in lumbar burst fractures with pedicle rupture

In the treatment of lumbar burst fractures with nerve injury, fusion is often required to rebuild spinal stability, but it can lead to the loss of motor units and increase the occurrence of adjacent segment diseases. Thus, a novel approach of lumbar canal decompression with "pedicle-plasty" strategy (DDP) was needed in clincal treatment. Firstly, image measurement analysis, the images of 60 patients with lumbar spine CT examinations were selected to measure osteotomy angle (OA), distance from the intersection of osteotomy plane and skin to the posterior midline (DM),transverse length of the osteotomy plane (TLOP), and sagittal diameter of the outer edge of superior articular process (SD). Secondary, cadaver study, distance between the intermuscular space and midline (DMSM), anterior and posterior diameters of the decompression (APDD), and lateral traction distance of the lumbosacral plexus (TDLP) were measured on 10 cadaveric specimens. Finally, procedure of DDP was demonstrated on cadaver specimens. OA ranged from 27.68°+4.59° to 38.34°+5.97°, DM ranged from 43.44+6.29 to 68.33+12.06 mm, TLOP ranged from 16.84+2.19 to 19.64+2.36 mm, and SD ranged from 22.49+1.74 to 25.53+2.21 mm. DMSM ranged from 45.53+5.73 to 65.46+6.43 mm. APDD were between 10.51+3.59 and 12.12+4.54 mm, and TDLP were between 3.28+0.81 and 6.27+0.62 mm.DDP was successfully performed on cadaveric specimens. DDP, as a novel approach of decompression of burst fractures with pedicle rupture, can fully relieve the occupation and at the same time preserve the spinal motor unit because of no resection of intervertebral discs and no destruction of facet joints,and has certain developmental significance.

Anterior Transarticular Crossing Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Joint Instability: A Biomechanical Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the biomechanical stability of anterior transarticular crossing screw (ATCS) and compare it with anterior transarticular screw (ATS) which may provide basic evidence for clinical application.

METHODS

Eight human fresh cadaveric specimens (occiput-C4) were tested with 5 conditions including the intact status, the injury status (type II odontoid fracture), the injury+ATS fixation status (traditional bilateral ATS fixation); the injury+unilateral ATCS fixation status; and the injury+bilateral ATCS fixation status. Specimens were applied to a pure moment of 1.5 Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively. The range of motions (ROMs) and the neutral zones (NZs) of C1 to C2 segment were calculated and compared between 5 status.

RESULTS

ATS and ATCS fixations significantly reduced the motions in all directions when compared with the intact and injury statues (p < 0.05). In flexion-extension, the ROMs of ATS, unilateral ATCS, and bilateral ATCS were 4.7° ± 2.5°, 4.1° ± 1.9°, and 3.2° ± 1.2°, respectively. Bilateral ATCS resulted in a significant decrease in ROM in flexion-extension when compared with ATS and unilateral ATCS (p = 0.035 and p = 0.023). In lateral bending and axial rotation, there was no significant difference in ROM between the 3 fixations (p > 0.05). Three fixations resulted in similar NZs in all directions (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ATCS is a biomechanically effective alternative or supplemental method for atlantoaxial instability.

Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability and advantages of intraoperative imaging using a 3D flat panel in the treatment of C1/2 instabilities.

MATERIALS

Prospective single-centered study including surgeries at the upper cervical spine between 06/2016 and 12/2018. Intraoperatively thin K-wires were placed under 2D fluoroscopic control. Then an intraoperative 3D-scan was carried out. The image quality was assessed based on a numeric analogue scale (NAS) from 0 to 10 (0 = worst quality, 10 = perfect quality) and the time for the 3D-scan was measured. Additionally, the wire positions were evaluated regarding malpositions.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients were included (33f, 25 m, average age 75.2 years, r.:18-95) with pathologies of C2: 45 type II fractures according to Anderson/D'Alonzo with or without arthrosis of C1/2, 2 Unhappy triad of C1/2 (Odontoid fracture Type II, anterior or posterior C1 arch-fracture, Arthrosis C1/2) 4 pathological fractures, 3 pseudarthroses, 3 instabilities of C1/2 because of rheumatoid arthritis, 1 C2 arch fracture). 36 patients were treated from anterior [29 AOTAF (combined anterior odontoid and transarticular C1/2 screw fixation), 6 lag screws, 1 cement augmented lag screw] and 22 patients from posterior (regarding to Goel/Harms). The median image quality was 8.2 (r.: 6-10). In 41 patients (70.7%) the image quality was 8 or higher and in none of the patients below 6. All of those 17 patients the image quality below 8 (NAS 7 = 16; 27.6%, NAS 6 = 1, 1.7%), had dental implants. A total of 148 wires were analyzed. 133 (89.9%) showed a correct positioning. In the other 15 (10.1%) cases a repositioning had to be done (n = 8; 5.4%) or it had to be drawn back (n = 7; 4.7%). A repositioning was possible in all cases. The implementation of an intraoperative 3D-Scan took an average of 267 s (r.: 232-310 s). No technical problems occurred.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative 3D imaging in the upper cervical spine is fast and easy to perform with sufficient image quality in all patients. Potential malposition of the primary screw canal can be detected by initial wire positioning before the Scan. The intraoperative correction was possible in all patients. Trial registration German Trials Register (Registered 10 August 2021, DRKS00026644-Trial registration: German Trials Register (Registered 10 August 2021, DRKS00026644- https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00026644 ).

Biomechanical comparison of anterior axis-atlanto-occipital transarticular fixation and anterior atlantoaxial transarticular fixation after odontoidectomy: A finite element analysis

Background: Anterior axis-atlanto-occipital transarticular fixation (AAOF) and anterior atlanto-axial transarticular fixation (AAF) are two common anterior screw fixation techniques after odontoidectomy, but the biomechanical discrepancies between them remain unknown. Objectives: To investigate the biomechanical properties of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) after odontoidectomy, with AAOF or AAF. Methods: A validated finite element model of the intact occipital-cervical spine (from occiput to T1) was modified to investigate biomechanical changes, resulting from odontoidectomy, odontoidectomy with AAOF, and odontoidectomy with AAF. Results: After odontoidectomy, the range of motion (ROM) at C1-C2 increased in all loading directions, and the ROM at the Occiput-C1 elevated by 66.2%, 57.5%, and 41.7% in extension, lateral bending, and torsion, respectively. For fixation models, the ROM at the C1-C2 junction was observably reduced after odontoidectomy with AAOF and odontoidectomy with AAF. In addition, at the Occiput-C1, the ROM of odontoidectomy with AAOF model was notably lower than the normal model in extension (94.9%), flexion (97.6%), lateral bending (91.8%), and torsion (96.4%). But compared with the normal model, in the odontoidectomy with AAF model, the ROM of the Occiput-C1 increased by 52.2%, -0.1%, 92.1%, and 34.2% in extension, lateral bending, and torsion, respectively. Moreover, there were no distinctive differences in the stress at the screw-bone interface or the C2-C3 intervertebral disc between the two fixation systems. Conclusion: AAOF can maintain CVJ stability at the Occiput-C1 after odontoidectomy, but AAF cannot. Thus, for patients with pre-existing atlanto-occipital joint instability, AAOF is more suitable than AAF in the choice of anterior fixation techniques.

Atlantoaxial Anterior Transarticular Screw Fixation: Indications and Surgical Technique

Posterior atlantoaxial screw fixation is a widely adopted therapeutic option for C1-C2 instability secondary to fractures or dislocation, degenerative diseases, or tumors at this level. Anterior transarticular screw fixation (ATSF) is an effective alternative to the posterior approaches, presenting several advantages despite being scarcely known and rarely chosen.In this chapter, we describe the ATSF step by step, illustrating its variations reported in literature, and we critically analyze the several advantages and contraindications of this technique. Moreover, we provide a list of tips and tricks on the surgical procedure, including critical operating room settings-the result of more than 10 years of experience in the field by a senior author.ATSF is a valid strategy for the treatment of different diseases occurring at the level of the atlantoaxial complex that needs consideration. Given the significant learning curve of this strategy, some hints may be essential to begin introducing this technique in the personal armamentarium of a spine surgeon so that they can perform ATSF safely and effectively.

Referencing for anterior atlantoaxial trans-articular osteosynthesis: a radiological study and proposal of a decisional algorithm

PURPOSE

Anterior trans-articular C1-C2 screw placement can be considered as a surgical alternative in different conditions affecting the atlantoaxial region. While its rigidity is similar to posterior Magerl and Harms techniques, it also provides some surgical advantages. However, the literature lacks papers exhaustively describing indication criteria, surgical steps, and pitfalls.

METHODS

This is a radiological study on 100 healthy subjects. Thin-layer CT scans of the craniovertebral junction were retrieved from the institutional database. The coronal inclination of the C1-C2 joint rim and the depth of the entry point of the screw with respect to the anterior profile of C2 were measured. The antero-posterior and the medio-lateral surgical corridors for the screw placement, and the wideness of the target area on the upper surface of C1 were also measured.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis showed that the coronal inclination of the C1-C2 articular joint rim strongly influences the surface extension of the C1 target area; the depth of the entry point and the C1-C2 articular rim inclination seem to be independent factors in influencing both the medio-lateral and the antero-posterior surgical corridors wideness. A decisional algorithm on whether to perform an anterior or posterior approach to the atlantoaxial region was also proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

We can conclude that, as much as the C1-C2 articular rim is tending to the horizontal line, and as deeper is the entry point of the screw on the anterior profile of C2, as easier the anterior C1-C2 trans-articular screw placement will result.

Design a novel integrated screw for minimally invasive atlantoaxial anterior transarticular screw fixation: a finite element analysis

PURPOSE

To design a new type of screw for minimally invasive atlantoaxial anterior transarticular screw (AATS) fixation with a diameter that is significantly thicker than that of traditional screws, threaded structures at both ends, and a porous metal structure in the middle. The use of a porous metal structure can effectively promote bone fusion and compensate for the disadvantages of traditional AATSs in terms of insufficient fixation strength and difficulty of bone fusion. The biomechanical stability of this screw was verified through finite element analysis. This instrument may provide a new surgical option for the treatment of atlantoaxial disorders.

METHODS

According to the surgical procedure, the new type of AATS was placed in a three-dimensional atlantoaxial model to determine the setting of relevant parameters such as the diameter, length, and thread to porous metal ratio of the structure. According to the results of measurement, the feasibility and safety of the new AATS were verified, and a representative finite element model of the upper cervical vertebrae was chosen to establish, and the validity of the model was verified. Then, finite element-based biomechanical analysis was performed using three models, i.e., atlantoaxial posterior pedicle screw fixation, traditional atlantoaxial AATS fixation, and atlantoaxial AATS fixation with the new type of screw, and the biomechanical effectiveness of the novel AATS was verified.

RESULTS

By measuring the atlantoaxial parameters, the atlantoaxial CT data of the representative 30-year-old normal adult male were selected to create a personalized 3D printing AATS screw. In this case, the design parameters of the new screw were determined as follows: diameter, 6 mm; length of the head thread structure, 10 mm; length of the middle porous metal structure, 8 mm (a middle porous structure containing an annular cylinder ); length of the tail thread structure, 8 mm; and total length, 26 mm. Applying the same load conditions to the atlantoaxial complex along different directions in the established finite element models of the three types of atlantoaxial fusion modes, the immediate stability of the new AATS is similar with Atlantoaxial posterior pedicle screw fixation.They are both superior to traditional atlantoaxial anterior screw fixation.The maximum local stress on the screw head in the atlantoaxial anterior surgery was less than those of traditional atlantoaxial anterior surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

By measuring relevant atlantoaxial data, we found that screws with a larger diameter can be used in AATS surgery, and the new AATS can make full use of the atlantoaxial lateral mass space and increase the stability of fixation. The finite element analysis and verification revealed that the biomechanical stability of the new AATS was superior to the AATS used in traditional atlantoaxial AATS fixation. The porous metal structure of the new AATS may promote fusion between atlantoaxial joints and allow more effective bone fusion in the minimally invasive anterior approach surgery.

The Anterior Transarticular Fixation of C1/C2 in the Elderly With Dens Fractures

Background

Anterior transarticular screw fixation (ATSF) of C1/C2 can be used for the treatment of unstable dens fractures. Here, we evaluated the feasibility of an anterior C1/C2 fixation in elderly patients with unstable dens fractures. Furthermore, we tried to analyze safe entry zones for ATSF surgery.

Methods

A consecutive cohort of 13 patients with unstable dens fractures were treated with ATSF of C1/C2 between January 2015 and October 2016. If necessary, an additional screw was placed into the odontoid process. The placement was radiographically analyzed using the 3D Arcadis Orbic (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Additionally, computed tomography scans of the cervical spine from 50 trauma patients were analyzed to evaluate safe entry zones for anterior odontoid screw fixation and for ATSF.

Results

ATSF was performed in 13 cases (7 female, 6 male; mean age 81.80 years). One screw had to be corrected intraoperatively due to initial malplacement. Neurological deficits or an injury of the vertebral artery were not observed. All patients suffered from swallowing difficulties during the postoperative course, without lesions of the esophagus or the trachea. In 4 patients (30.8%), an additional posterior fixation was offered to the patients due to progressive loosening of the screws.The anatomical-radiographic analyzes revealed a significantly shallower angle of trajectory for anterior odontoid screw fixation (24.9° ± 5.85°) than for ATSF (39.1° ± 6.44° (left); 40.5° ± 6.79° (right) P = 0.02).

Conclusions

The ATSF of C1/C2 might be a valuable option in the treatment of instable C1/C2 fractures, especially in the elderly or in patients with short necks and/or high body mass index due to the steeper trajectory compared with odontoid screw placement. Yet available screws seem to be of inferior resistance compared with the biomechanical properties of a dorsal fixation. Further studies should focus on screws with better mechanical properties and probably additional cement augmentation.

Level of Evidence

4.

Radiologic Characteristics of Anterior Transarticular Crossing Screw Placement for Atlantoaxial Joint Instability

OBJECTIVE

The feasibility of anterior transarticular crossing screws (ATCS) was confirmed in cadaveric specimens and it has been used in clinic. However, no study has documented the morphometric characteristics of ATCS. This study seeks to determine the morphometric characteristics of ATCS in C1-C2 fixation.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients without abnormality of C1-2 were enrolled. The range of screw lateral angles (LAs) and the screw lengths of ATCS on coronal images were measured on multiplanar computed tomography images, as well as the screw incline angles (IAs) in the sagittal plane. The ideal trajectory was designed as toward to the posterosuperior points of the opposite C1 lateral mass, which had the longest screw.

RESULTS

The LAs were relatively small in men (31.4°-45.3°) compared with women (32.6°-46.0°). In the sagittal plane, the IAs were ranged from 41.0° to 68.4° in men and from 44.4° to 68.1° in women. The overall screw lengths were longer in men (34.7-44.8 mm) than in women (32.2-39.6 mm). In the ideal path, the LA and IA were 38.4° and 41.0° in men and 39.6° and 44.4° in women, and the screw lengths were 44.8 mm in men and 39.6 mm in women.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the range of screw angles and lengths of ATCS, which will help surgeons to perform ATCS safely and accurately.

Anatomic Considerations of Anterior Transarticular Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability

Study Design

Cadaveric, observational study.

Purpose

Atlantoaxial instability (AAI) is characterized by excessive movement at the C1–C2 junction between the atlas and axis. An anterior surgical approach to expose the upper cervical spine for internal fixation and bone grafting has been developed to fix AAI. Currently, no anatomic information exists on the anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw or screw and plate fixation between C1 and C2 in the Indian population. The objective of this study is to assess the anatomic landmarks of C1–C2 vertebrae: entry point, trajectory, screw length, and safety of the procedure.

Overview of Literature

Methods outlined by Magerl and Harms are the optimal approaches among the dorsal techniques. Contraindications for these techniques include aberrant location of vertebral arteries, fractures of C1–C2 posterior structures. In these cases, anterior transarticular fixation is an alternative. Several available screw insertion trajectories have been reported. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that adequate rigidity of this fixation is comparable with posterior fusion techniques.

Methods

Direct measurements using Vernier calipers and a goniometer were recorded from 30 embalmed human cadavers. The primary parameters measured were the minimum and maximum lateral and posterior angulations of the screw in the sagittal and coronal planes, respectively, and optimum screw length, if it was placed accurately.

Results

The posterior and lateral angles of screw placement in the coronal and sagittal planes ranged from 16° to 30° (mean±standard deviation [SD], 23.93°±3.93°) and 8° to 17° (mean±SD, 13.3°±2.26°), respectively. The optimum screw length was 25–38 mm (mean±SD, 28.76±3.69 mm).

Conclusions

If the screw was inserted without lateral angulation, the spinal canal or cord could be violated. If a longer screw was inserted with greater posterior angulation, the vertebral artery at the posterior or posterolateral aspect of the C1 superior facet could be violated. Thus, 26° and 30° of lateral and posterior angulations, respectively, are the maximum angles permissible to avoid injury of the vertebral artery and violations of the spinal canal or atlanto-occipital joint.

Feasibility of Modified Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation: Analysis of a New Trajectory Using 3-Dimensional Simulation Software

BACKGROUND

Anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) has been suggested as the optimal treatment for type II and some shallow type III odontoid fractures. However, only the classical surgical trajectory is available; no newer entry points or trajectories have been reported.

METHODS

We evaluated the anatomic feasibility of a new trajectory for AOSF using 3-dimensional (3D) screw insertion simulation software (Mimics). Computed tomography (CT) scans of patients (65 males and 59 females) with normal cervical structures were obtained consecutively, and the axes were reconstructed in 3 dimensions by Mimics software. Then simulated operations were performed using 2 new entry points below the superior articular process using bilateral screws of different diameters (group 1: 4 mm and 4 mm; group 2: 4 mm and 3.5 mm; group 3: 3.5 mm and 3.5 mm). The success rates and the required screw lengths were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The success rates were 79.03% for group 1, 95.16% for group 2, and 98.39% for group 3. The success rates for groups 2 and 3 did not differ significantly, and both were significantly better than the rate for group 1. The success rate was much higher in males than in females in group 1, but the success rate was similar in males and females in the other 2 groups. Screw lengths did not differ significantly among the 3 groups, but an effect of sex was apparent.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified trajectory is anatomically feasible for fixation of anterior odontoid fractures, but further anatomic experiments and clinical research are needed.

Percutaneous anterior C1/2 transarticular screw fixation: salvage of failed percutaneous odontoid screw fixation for odontoid fracture

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to investigate the outcomes and safety of using percutaneous anterior C1/2 transarticular screw fixation as a salvage technique for odontoid fracture if percutaneous odontoid screw fixation fails.

METHODS

Fifteen in 108 odontoid fracture patients (planned to be treated by percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation) were failed to introduce satisfactory odontoid screw trajectory. To salvage this problem, we chose the percutaneous anterior C1/2 transarticular screw fixation technique in treatment of these patients. The visual analogue score (VAS) of neck pain and Neck Disability Index (NDI) of all patients were scored at pre-operation, 3 months after operation, and final follow-up. Additional, technique-related complications were recorded and collected.

RESULTS

Percutaneous C1/2 transarticular screw fixation was performed successfully in all 15 patients whose odontoid screw fixation failed. No technique-related complications (such as nerve injury, spinal cord injury, and esophageal injury) occurred. The VAS of neck pain and NDI score improved significantly (P = 0.000) after operation, and no significant differences were found when compared to 93 non-salvage patients who successfully performed the percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation. No screw loose or breakage occurred, all of the odontoid fractures achieve radiographic fusion, bony fusion bridge could be observed at the C1/2 lateral articular facet on 9/15 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that percutaneous anterior C1/2 transarticular screw fixation is a good alternative salvage technique if percutaneous odontoid screw fixation failed, and it is a minimally invasive, feasible, and safe technique.

Anterior transarticular C1-C2 fixation with contralateral screw insertion: a report of two cases and technical note

PURPOSE

Anterior transarticular fixation of the C1-C2 vertebrae is a well-known technique that involves screw insertion through the body of the C2 vertebra into the lateral masses of the atlas through an anterior transcervical approach. Meanwhile, contralateral screw insertion has been previously described only in anatomical studies.

METHODS

We describe two case reports of the clinical application of this new technique.

RESULTS

In Case 1, the patient was diagnosed with an unstable C1 fracture. The clinical features of the case did not allow for any type of posterior atlantoaxial fusion, Halo immobilization, or routine anterior fixation using the Reindl and Koller techniques. The possible manner of screw insertion into the anterior third of the right lateral mass was via a contralateral trajectory, which was performed in this case. Case 2 involved a patient with neglected posteriorly dislocated dens fracture who could not lie in the prone position due to concomitant cardiac pathology. Reduction of atlantoaxial dislocation was insufficient, even after scar tissue resection at the fracture, while transdental fusion was not possible. Considering the success of the previous case, atlantoaxial fixation was performed through the small approach, using the Reindl technique and contralateral screw insertion.

CONCLUSIONS

These two cases demonstrate the potential of anterior transarticular fixation of C1-C2 vertebrae in cases where posterior atlantoaxial fusion is not achievable. This type of fixation can be performed through a single approach if one screw is inserted using the Reindl technique and another is inserted via a contralateral trajectory.

A Method to Prevent Occipitocervical Joint Violation Using Plain Radiography During Percutaneous Anterior Transarticular Screw Fixation

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study of anterior transarticular screw (ATS) fixation patients.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a method to determine screw tip position through plain radiography after percutaneous ATS fixation to prevent occipitocervical joint (OCJ) violation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

No studies using plain radiography to prevent OCJ violation during percutaneous ATS fixation have been performed.

METHODS

In total, 34 subjects (with 68 screws) who had undergone percutaneous ATS fixation were enrolled. To evaluate the screw tip location in relation to the C1 lateral mass (LM), the screw tip positions were graded 1, 2, or 3 on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs, and I, II, or III on lateral radiographs. OCJ violation was analyzed by postoperative computed tomography (CT).

RESULTS

Screws with tips located lower (tip I) in the LM did not result in OCJ violation. Only one tip in the tip 3 position showed OCJ perforation, and this screw was also located in tip III. Screw perforation rates of tip 1-tip II, tip 1-tip III, and tip 2-tip III were the highest (100%), followed by tip 2-tip II (10.5%) and tip3-tip III (10%).

CONCLUSION

This study provides insights into OCJ violation during percutaneous ATS fixation. According to AP radiography, a percutaneous ATS with the screw tip located in the lateral part of the LM resulted in a lower rate of OCJ perforation, whereas screws located in the medial LM resulted in the highest rate of perforation. Percutaneous ATS with the screw tip located in the neutral part of the LM should ensure that the screw tip is below the upper part of the LM, preventing OCJ violation. These findings may help surgeons assess screw positioning both during and after the operation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

A novel computed method to reconstruct the bilateral digital interarticular channel of atlas and its use on the anterior upper cervical screw fixation

Purpose. To investigate a novel computed method to reconstruct the bilateral digital interarticular channel of atlas and its potential use on the anterior upper cervical screw fixation.

Methods. We have used the reverse engineering software (image-processing software and computer-aided design software) to create the approximate and optimal digital interarticular channel of atlas for 60 participants. Angles of channels, diameters of inscribed circles, long and short axes of ellipses were measured and recorded, and gender-specific analysis was also performed.

Results. The channels provided sufficient space for one or two screws, and the parameters of channels are described. While the channels of females were smaller than that of males, no significant difference of angles between males and females were observed.

Conclusion. Our study demonstrates the radiological features of approximate digital interarticular channels, optimal digital interarticular channels of atlas, and provides the reference trajectory of anterior transarticular screws and anterior occiput-to-axis screws. Additionally, we provide a protocol that can help make a pre-operative plan for accurate placement of anterior transarticular screws and anterior occiput-to-axis screws.

Percutaneous atlantoaxial anterior transarticular screw fixation combined with mini-open posterior C1/2 wire fusion for patients with a high-riding vertebral artery

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE

To describe the technique and clinical results of percutaneous atlantoaxial anterior transarticular fixation combined with limited exposure posterior C1/2 arthrodesis in patients with a high-riding vertebral artery.

DESIGN SETTING

Zhejiang Spine Center, China.

PARTICIPANTS

Five patients with a high-riding vertebral artery and an upper cervical fracture.

INTERVENTIONS

Percutaneous atlantoaxial anterior transarticular screw fixation combined with limited exposure posterior C1/2 wire fusion.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Computed tomography scans were used to assess the high-riding vertebral artery and feasibility of anterior transarticular screw fixation preoperatively. A Philadelphia collar was used to immobilize the neck postoperatively. Anteroposterior (open-mouth) and lateral views were obtained at pre/postoperation and at the follow-up.

RESULTS

The operation was performed successfully on all of the patients, and no intraoperative operation-related complications such as nerve injury, vertebral artery, and soft tissue complications occurred. The mean follow-up period was 33.8 months (range: 24 to 58 months). No screw breakage, loosening, pullout, or cutout was observed. Bone union was achieved in all patients at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our small case series results suggested that percutaneous anterior transarticular screw fixation combined with mini-open posterior C1/2 wire fusion is a technically minimally invasive, safe, feasible, and useful method to treat patients with a high-riding vertebral artery.

Feasibility and trajectory study of anterior transarticular crossing screw placement for atlantoaxial joint instability: a cadaveric study and description of a novel technique

PURPOSE

In unique clinical situations where C1-C2 anterior transarticular screw (ATS) fixation is not available or has failed, an anterior transarticular crossing screw (ATCS) with transcorporal pathway of the screws inside the contralateral promontory of C2 may enhance the stabilization and achieve atlantoaxial arthrodesis. The present study was to describe a novel technique of ATCS fixation for atlantoaxial joint instability and its applied anatomy, and compared it with ATS fixation method.

METHODS

Direct measurements using digital calipers and a goniometer were conducted on 30 pairs of dried human C1 and C2 vertebrae. The ATS and ATCS with screws (Φ 4.0 mm) were performed on 11 fresh cervical spine specimens. The screw lengths in the C1 and C2, and screw entry angles of the ATS and ATCS were measured, respectively. Cadaver specimens were dissected to observe the incidence of violation to the important structures surrounding the ATS and ATCS fixation technique.

RESULTS

There was enough osseous space for ATCS placement. The lateral and incline angle of the ATCS was 36.2° and 28.7°, respectively. Screw purchase in C2 of the ATCS (25.6 mm) was greater than that of the ATS (11.4 mm). The ATCS C1 purchase (14.8 mm) was similar to the ATS C1 purchase (14.9 mm). No violation to the vertebral artery groove, the spinal canal or the atlanto-occipital joint was observed after the ATCS placement.

CONCLUSION

Anterior transarticular crossing screw is a feasible and viable option for atlantoaxial fixation in selected cases. This technique achieved remarkable longer screw purchase and could enhance the atlantoaxial stability.

Morphometric Analysis of Axis and Its Clinical Significance -An Anatomical Study of Indian Human Axis Vertebrae

BACKGROUND

The atlas and axis vertebra have unique shape and complex relationship with vertebral artery. Fracture of dens of axis accounts for 7-27% of all cervical spine fractures, but surgeries in these regions are highly risky because of the reported incidences of vertebral artery injury.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

The study was designed to measure morphometric data of human axis vertebra, of Indian origin. The different anatomical parameters on dry specimen of human axis vertebrae were established and the results were compared with other studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty intact human axis vertebrae were measured with digital vernier caliper and mini-inclinometer. Various linear and angular parameters of axis were observed.

RESULTS

The mean distance from the midline of body to the tip of transverse process of axis was 29.32 mm on right side and 29.06mm on left side. The mean distance from the midline of body to the lateral most edge of superior articulating facet was 22.8 mm on right side and 22.6 mm on left side. The mean value of anterior and posterior height of axis was 34.33±2.69mm and 30.56±2.78mm respectively. The anterior and posterior height of body of axis was 19.67 mm and 16.67mm respectively. Mean A-P and transverse diameter of inferior surface of axis was 15.42mm and 17.7mm respectively. Mean transverse diameter and mean A-P diameter of odontoid process was 9.32 mm and 10.1 mm respectively. Mean anterior and posterior height of the odontoid process was 14.66 mm and 13.89mm respectively. Mean of dens axis sagittal angle (angle between an axis that was imagined to pass longitudinally through the dens axis and the vertical line on a sagittal plane) was 13.23 degree. The shape of superior articulating facets of C2 varies from oval to circular. In the present study, 84% of SAF were oval and 16% were circular. Inferior articulating facets were circular in shape in 90% cases, and oval in 10% vertebra. Mean pedicle width was 10.07mm on right side and 10.52mm on left side. Mean transverse diameter of vertebral canal was 22.37±1.73mm. Mean of A-P diameter of vertebral canal at inlet was 18.31±2.05mm and mean of A-P diameter of vertebral canal at outlet was 14.84±1.63mm.

CONCLUSION

These results obtained from this study may be helpful for the surgeons in avoiding and minimizing complications such as vertebral artery injury, cranial nerve damage and injury to other vital structures while doing surgery around cranio-vertebral region.

Atlantoaxial anterior transarticular screw fixation: a case series and reappraisal of the technique

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Atlantoaxial instability is commonly treated with C1-C2 fixation performed via posterior approaches. Although anterior transarticular screw (ATS) fixation, performed with a classic retropharyngeal approach, was described more than 10 years ago, the published literature still lacks a comprehensive analysis of the procedure and a real case series.

PURPOSE

We report a series of patients treated with atlantoaxial ATS, describing the surgical procedure in detail and discussing advantages and disadvantages of the technique.

STUDY DESIGN

The study design includes case series and technical report.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 15 patients affected by atlantoaxial instability secondary to trauma, degenerative diseases, or inflammatory diseases. Anterior transarticular screw fixation was performed with anteroposterior open-mouth and lateral intraoperative radiographs. All patients were evaluated radiologically at follow-up to identify bone fusion.

RESULTS

Anterior transarticular screw was performed successfully in 14 patients without complications. The procedure was aborted in a case of vertebral invagination, and one case required revision surgery owing to C2 articular bone fracture. Solid C1-C2 fusion was achieved in all cases (at 10- to 21-week follow-up) except in an elderly patient affected by severe osteoporosis. No complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the procedure is still not widely known, ATS allows the effective and safe treatment of C1-C2 instability even in patients with systemic comorbidities. It offers several advantages over posterior approaches.

The radiological feature of anterior occiput-to-axis screw fixation as it guides the screw trajectory on 3D printed models: a feasibility study on 3D images and 3D printed models

Anterior occiput-to-axis screw fixation is more suitable than a posterior approach for some patients with a history of posterior surgery. The complex osseous anatomy between the occiput and the axis causes a high risk of injury to neurological and vascular structures, and it is important to have an accurate screw trajectory to guide anterior occiput-to-axis screw fixation. Thirty computed tomography (CT) scans of upper cervical spines were obtained for three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction. Cylinders (1.75 mm radius) were drawn to simulate the trajectory of an anterior occiput-to-axis screw. The imitation screw was adjusted to 4 different angles and measured, as were the values of the maximized anteroposterior width and the left-right width of the occiput (C0) to the C1 and C1 to C2 joints. Then, the 3D models were printed, and an angle guide device was used to introduce the screws into the 3D models referring to the angles calculated from the 3D images. We found the screw angle ranged from α1 (left: 4.99±4.59°; right: 4.28±5.45°) to α2 (left: 20.22±3.61°; right: 19.63±4.94°); on the lateral view, the screw angle ranged from β1 (left: 13.13±4.93°; right: 11.82±5.64°) to β2 (left: 34.86±6.00°; right: 35.01±5.77°). No statistically significant difference was found between the data of the left and right sides. On the 3D printed models, all of the anterior occiput-to-axis screws were successfully introduced, and none of them penetrated outside of the cortex; the mean α4 was 12.00±4.11 (left) and 12.25±4.05 (right), and the mean β4 was 23.44±4.21 (left) and 22.75±4.41 (right). No significant difference was found between α4 and β4 on the 3D printed models and α3 and β3 calculated from the 3D digital images of the left and right sides. Aided with the angle guide device, we could achieve an optimal screw trajectory for anterior occiput-to-axis screw fixation on 3D printed C0 to C2 models.

Fluoroscopically guided anterior atlantoaxial transarticular screws: a feasibility and trajectory study using CT-based simulation software

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Anterior transarticular screw (ATAS) fixation has been suggested as a viable alternative to posterior stabilization. However, we are not aware of previous reports attempting to establish the usefulness of specific fluoroscopic landmark-guided trajectories in the use of ATAS, and we could find no reference to it in a computerized search using MEDLINE.

PURPOSE

To determine the anatomic feasibility of ATAS placement using defined fluoroscopic landmarks to guide screw trajectory.

STUDY DESIGN

Evaluation using three-dimensional screw insertion simulation software and 1.0-mm-interval computed tomographic scans.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Computed tomographic scans of 100 patients including 50 men and 50 women.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of violation of the vertebral artery groove of C1 and C2, the spinal canal, and the atlanto-occipital joint and screw lengths and lengths of C1 and C2 purchase.

METHODS

Four screw trajectories were determined: promontory screw (PS), single central facet (CF) screw, and medial (MF) and lateral (LF) double facet screws. Placement of a 4.0-mm screw was simulated using defined fluoroscopic landmarks for each trajectory. The previously mentioned outcome measures were evaluated and compared for the four trajectories. This study was not supported by any financial sources, and there is no topic-specific potential conflict of interest with this study.

RESULTS

No violation of the C1 or C2 vertebral artery groove or of the spinal canal was observed for any of the screw types. Screw lengths and the length of C2 purchase were by far the longest for PS (40.4±2.8 and 25.7±2.1 mm, respectively; p<.001 in all post hoc comparisons). The length of C1 purchase was longer for CF (16.4±2.3 mm) and LF (15.8±1.6 mm) than PS (14.7±2.0 mm) and MF (14.6±2.4 mm) (p≤.001, respectively). There was no atlanto-occipital joint violation if the length of C1 purchase was set at 12 mm for CF and LF and at 10 mm for PS and MF.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that it may be possible to place ATASs without violating the vertebral artery groove, spinal canal, or the atlanto-occipital joint by using the described entry points, trajectories, and fluoroscopic landmarks.

Evaluation of biomechanical properties of anterior atlantoaxial transarticular locking plate system using three-dimensional finite element analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate a new anterior atlantoaxial transarticular locking plate system using finite element analysis.

METHODS

Thin-section spiral computed tomography was performed from occiput to C2 region. A finite element model of an unstable atlantoaxial joint, treated with an anterior atlantoaxial transarticular locking plate system, was compared with the simple anterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw system. Flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were imposed on the model. Displacement of the atlantoaxial transarticular screw and stress at the screw-bone interface were observed for the two internal fixation systems.

RESULTS

Screw displacement was less using the anterior atlantoaxial transarticular locking plate system compared to simple anterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation under various conditions, and stability increased especially during flexion and extension.

CONCLUSIONS

The anterior atlantoaxial transarticular locking plate system not only provided stronger fixation, but also decreased screw-bearing stress and screw-bone interface stress compared to simple anterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation.

[Surgical procedures to stabilize the upper cervical spine]

The options for surgical treatment of injuries to the upper cervical spine have increased considerably in recent years. A distinction can be made between two forms of surgical stabilization. Techniques of osteosynthesis serve to reconstruct the injured structure with the goal of maintaining mobility of the upper cervical spine. A spondylodesis, that can be performed at the atlantoaxial or occipitoatlantoaxial joint, aims to stabilize the upper cervical spine by fusion techniques. This article describes the surgical procedures for both treatment principles with regard to the indications, techniques, and complications.

Anterolateral C1–C2 Transarticular Fixation for Atlantoaxial Arthrodesis: Landmarks, Working Area, and Angles of Approach

BACKGROUND:

An alternative route must be used for atlantoaxial arthrodesis to avoid the risks of transoral route or when posterior approaches are contraindicated.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess relevant quantitative anatomic parameters for C1–C2 anterolateral transarticular fixation and to demonstrate the nuances of an anterolateral approach to the upper cervical spine.

METHODS:

Five cadaveric necks were dissected bilaterally to demonstrate anatomic landmarks and surgical technique. The C2 pars interarticularis was used as the entry for inserting screws toward the C1 lateral mass. Ten computed tomography scans were analyzed to quantify working area and optimal angles of approach.

RESULTS:

The medial surface of sternocleidomastoid muscle was dissected extensively but not divided. The C2 transverse process was a landmark for guiding dissection posterior to the carotid sheath. In all specimens, the gray ramus communicans from the superior cervical ganglion to the C2 nerve was a landmark for locating the C2 pars. Slightly below that branch, the longus capitis muscle could be displaced medially to reach the C2 pars. The ideal angles for screw placement were 22.9 ± 5.7° medial to the sagittal plane and 25.3 ± 7.4° posterior to the coronal plane. The mean working area was 71.2 mm2 (range, 49–103 mm2).

CONCLUSION:

We propose a new anterolateral stabilization technique for atlantoaxial instability based on less traumatic dissection of the upper cervical region, different instrumentation, and guidance by reliable landmarks. For anterolateral transarticular C1–C2 screw fixation, the gray ramus communicans to the C2 nerve is a reliable landmark for locating the entry for a screw on the C2 pars.

Microendoscopic anterior approach for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: surgical techniques and preliminary results

STUDY DESIGN

Surgical techniques and preliminary results.

OBJECTIVE

To describe and evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new minimal invasive technique for the irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IADD).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Endoscope has been widely used in minimal invasive spinal surgery. However, there are no clinical reports regarding anterior approach for IADD in the literature.

METHODS

Ten consecutive patients with IADD were treated by anterior release with microendoscopic aide and subsequently reduction, anterior transarticular screw fixation and morselized autologous bone grafts. There were 3 cases of odontoid dysplasia, 4, chronic odontoid fracture, 1, odontoid absence, 1 fasilar impression, and 1 malunion of odontoid fracture. According to Symon and Lavender's classification of disability, 6 cases were moderate disability, 3 severe nonbedbound, and 1 severe bedridden. The procedure was performed by the same surgeon (Yong-Long Chi).

RESULTS

The new technique was performed successfully in all cases. All the patients underwent transarticular screw fixation and anterior morselized autograft fusion. The average operation time was 120 min (range, 90 to 150 min) and the mean estimated blood loss was 150 mL (range, 100 to 250 mL). Postoperative radiographs demonstrated that 9 cases restored anatomic position and 1 had partial reduction. According to the postoperative computed tomography all the screws were appropriately placed. Follow-up after surgery, longest is 16 months and minimal 8 months with a mean of 12 months, neurologic status was improved in all patients. There was no loss of fixation and solid fusion was achieved in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical technique of microendoscopic anterior release, reduction, fixation, and fusion is safe and reliable minimally invasive for treating IADD.

Minimally invasive technique of triple anterior screw fixation for an acute combination atlas-axis fracture: case report and literature review

STUDY DESIGN

A case report to describe the minimally invasive technique of treating C1-type II odontoid combination fractures.

OBJECTIVE

To introduce a new, minimally invasive technique of triple anterior screw fixation for acute combination atlas-axis fractures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Management for C1-type II odontoid combination fractures includes traction, immobilization and posterior fusion with and without instrumentation and anterior odontoid screw fixation. The combination of odontoid and bilateral transarticular C1-C2 anterior screw fixation is a recent addition in treating C1-type II odontoid fractures.

METHODS

A case of combination atlas-type II odontoid fracture occurred in a 39-year-old man. Imaging examinations showed a fracture of the unilateral anterior and posterior arch of C1 associated with type II odontoid fracture and with significant prevertebral soft tissue edema. Treatment consisted of odontoid and bilateral C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation through bilateral anterior small incisions.

RESULTS

The patient was mobilized early postoperatively with a hard cervical collar and discharged 4 days later. On 2-year follow-up, he presented no cervical complaints and only mild reduction in neck rotation.

CONCLUSION

In case of C1-type II odontoid fracture, the triple anterior screw fixation can be taken into consideration as an alternative because of its superiority of minimal invasion, stability and safety.

Safe angle scope for posterior atlanto-occipital transarticular screw fixation

OBJECTIVE

To study the technical parameters related to, and explore the clinical significance of, posterior atlanto-occipital transarticular screw fixation.

METHODS

Posterior implantation of Kirschner wires via the atlanto-occipital joint was performed on 20 dry bone specimens with complete atlanto-occipital joints. The angle of the Kirschner wire was measured on a postimplantation x-ray. Three-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction of the atlanto-occipital joint of 30 healthy adults was performed to measure the simulative safety range for screw placement in posterior atlanto-occipital transarticular screw fixation. The procedure was then conducted on 12 fresh cadaver occipitocervical specimens. X-rays and 3-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction were performed postsurgery to verify exact screw positioning.

RESULTS

The ideal angles for screw placement were cephalocaudal angle in the sagittal plane of 53.3 +/- 3.4 degrees, mediolateral angle in the coronal plane of 20.0 +/- 2.6 degrees, a maximum allowable cephalocaudal angle of 74.6 +/- 2.8 degrees (67.9-80.5 degrees), a minimum allowable cephalocaudal angle of 24.9 +/- 1.9 degrees (22.1-29.4 degrees), a maximum allowable mediolateral angle of 40.5 +/- 2.9 degrees (31.1-49.4 degrees), and a minimum allowable mediolateral angle of 0.7 +/- 1.6 degrees (-4.1-5.9 degrees). Surgery simulation in the fresh cadaver specimens indicated that this safe scope is reliable.

CONCLUSION

There is a safe scope for the angle of the screw placement in posterior atlanto-occipital transarticular screw fixation. Posterior transarticular screw fixation can be safely performed for occipitocervical fusion fixation when utilizing careful screw placement.

Atlantoaxial fixation using the polyaxial screw-rod system

The aim of this study is to evaluate the first results of the atlantoaxial fixation using polyaxial screw-rod system. Twenty-eight patients followed-up 12-29 months (average 17.1 months) were included in this study. The average age was 59.5 years (range 23-89 years). The atlantoaxial fusion was employed in 20 patients for an acute injury to the upper cervical spine, in 1 patient with rheumatoid arthritis for atlantoaxial vertical instability, in 1 patient for C1-C2 osteoarthritis, in 2 patients for malunion of the fractured dens. Temporary fixation was applied in two patients for type III displaced fractures of the dens and in two patients for the atlantoaxial rotatory dislocation. Retrospectively, we evaluated operative time, intraoperative bleeding and the interval of X-ray exposure. The resulting condition was subjectively evaluated by patients. We evaluated also the placement, direction and length of the screws. Fusion or stability in the temporary fixation was evaluated on radiographs taken at 3, 6, 12 weeks and 6 and 12 months after the surgery. As concerns complications, intraoperatively we monitored injury of the nerve structures and the vertebral artery. Monitoring of postoperative complications was focused on delayed healing of the wound, breaking or loosening of screws and development of malunion. Operative time ranged from 35 to 155 min, (average 83 min). Intraoperative blood loss ranged from 50 to 1,500 ml (average 540 ml). The image intensifier was used for a period of 24 s to 2 min 36 s (average 1 min 6 s). Within the postoperative evaluation, four patients complained of paresthesia in the region innervated by the greater occipital nerve. A total of 56 screws were inserted into C1, their length ranged from 26 to 34 mm (average, 30.8 mm). All screws were positioned correctly in the C1 lateral mass. Another 56 screws were inserted into C2. Their length ranged from 28 to 36 mm (average 31.4 mm). Three screws were malpositioned: one screw perforated the spinal canal and two screws protruded into the vertebral artery canal. C1-C2 stability was achieved in all patients 12 weeks after the surgery. No clinically manifested injury of the vertebral artery or nerve structures was observed in any of these cases. As for postoperative complications, we recorded wound dehiscence in one patient. The Harms C1-C2 fixation is a very effective method of stabilizing the atlantoaxial complex. The possibility of a temporary fixation without damage to the atlantoaxial joints and of reduction after the screws and rods had been inserted is quite unique.

Biomechanical comparison of four C1 to C2 rigid fixative techniques: anterior transarticular, posterior transarticular, C1 to C2 pedicle, and C1 to C2 intralaminar screws

OBJECTIVE

We performed a biomechanical comparison of several C1 to C2 fixation techniques including crossed laminar (intralaminar) screw fixation, anterior C1 to C2 transarticular screw fixation, C1 to 2 pedicle screw fixation, and posterior C1 to C2 transarticular screw fixation.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric cervical spines were tested intact and after dens fracture. Four different C1 to C2 screw fixation techniques were tested. Posterior transarticular and pedicle screw constructs were tested twice, once with supplemental sublaminar cables and once without cables. The specimens were tested in three modes of loading: flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. All tests were performed in load and torque control. Pure bending moments of 2 nm were applied in flexion-extension and lateral bending, whereas a 1 nm moment was applied in axial rotation. Linear displacements were recorded from extensometers rigidly affixed to the C1 and C2 vertebrae. Linear displacements were reduced to angular displacements using trigonometry.

RESULTS

Adding cable fixation results in a stiffer construct for posterior transarticular screws. The addition of cables did not affect the stiffness of C1 to C2 pedicle screw constructs. There were no significant differences in stiffness between anterior and posterior transarticular screw techniques, unless cable fixation was added to the posterior construct. All three posterior screw constructs with supplemental cable fixation provide equal stiffness with regard to flexion-extension and axial rotation. C1 lateral mass-C2 intralaminar screw fixation restored resistance to lateral bending but not to the same degree as the other screw fixation techniques.

CONCLUSION

All four screw fixation techniques limit motion at the C1 to 2 articulation. The addition of cable fixation improves resistance to flexion and extension for posterior transarticular screw fixation.

Anterior retropharyngeal fixation C1-2 for stabilization of atlantoaxial instabilities: study of feasibility, technical description and preliminary results

Posterior transarticular screw fixation C1-2 with the Magerl technique is a challenging procedure for stabilization of atlantoaxial instabilities. Although its high primary stability favoured it to sublaminar wire-based techniques, the close merging of the vertebral artery (VA) and its violation during screw passage inside the axis emphasizes its potential risk. Also, posterior approach to the upper cervical spine produces extensive, as well as traumatic soft-tissue stripping. In comparison, anterior transarticular screw fixation C1-2 is an atraumatic technique, but has been neglected in the literature, even though promising results are published and lectured to date. In 2004, anterior screw fixation C1-2 was introduced in our department for the treatment of atlantoaxial instabilities. As it showed convincing results, its general anatomic feasibility was worked up. The distance between mid-sagittal line of C2 and medial border of the VA groove resembles the most important anatomic landmark in anterior transarticular screw fixation C1-2. Therefore, CT based measurements on 42 healthy specimens without pathology of the cervical spine were performed. Our data are compiled in an extended collection of anatomic landmarks relevant for anterior transarticular screw fixation C1-2. Based on anatomic findings, the technique and its feasibility in daily clinical work is depicted and discussed on our preliminary results in seven patients.

Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach to Upper Cervical Spine

OBJECTIVE

The transoral approach of Spetzler is the classic anterior access to the upper cervical spine that provides direct exposure for anterior decompression of the spinal cord. The risks of infection, the limits in extension, and the postoperative recovery difficulties of transmucosal access suggest the use of an alternative anterior extraoral approach in upper cervical surgery. However, this approach results in complications from nerve palsy because of excessive retraction of the hypoglossal and the superior laryngeal nerves. The goal of this work was to provide anatomic data for an anterior retropharyngeal upper cervical approach through a minimally invasive window below the hypoglossal and the superior laryngeal nerves.

METHODS

In two adult cadaveric cervical spines, the anterior approach using the Metrx tubular retractor system through a window between the hypoglossal nerve and the superior laryngeal nerve, as well as below these two nerves, is compared in the exposure of C1 and C2 anteriorly with the aid of an operating microscope.

RESULTS

A maximum diameter of the internervous window for the tubular retractor is reached beyond which the superior laryngeal nerve will be excessively stretched. Conversely, the tubular retractor can retract the superior laryngeal nerve superiorly without undue tension. Better proximal exposure is also made possible by angling an end-beveled tubular retractor on the mandible without undue compression on the hypoglossal and superior laryngeal nerves, the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve, and the submandibular gland.

CONCLUSION

This minimally invasive approach can replace transoral surgery, allowing direct anterior access to C1 and C2 while allowing extension to the lower cervical spine.

Biomechanical comparison of anterior and posterior stabilization methods in atlantoaxial instability

OBJECT

The authors compared the biomechanical stability of two anterior fixation procedures--anterior C1-2 Harms plate/screw (AHPS) fixation and the anterior C1-2 transarticular screw (ATS) fixation; and two posterior fixation procedures--the posterior C-1 lateral mass combined with C-2 pedicle screw/rod (PLM/APSR) fixation and the posterior C1-2 transarticular screw (PTS) fixation after destabilization.

METHODS

Sixteen human cervical spine specimens (Oc-C3) were tested in three-dimensional flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending motions after destabilization by using an atlantoaxial C1-2 instability model. In each loading mode, moments were applied to a maximum of 1.5 Nm, and the range of motion (ROM), neutral zone (NZ), and elastic zone (EZ) were determined and values compared using the intact spine, the destabilized spine, and the postfixation spine. The AHPS method produced inferior biomechanical results in flexion-extension and lateral bending modes compared with the intact spine. The lateral bending NZ and ROM for this method differed significantly from the other three fixation techniques (p < 0.05), although statistically significant differences were not obtained for all other values of ROM and NZ for the other three procedures. The remaining three methods restored biomechanical stability and improved it over that of the intact spine.

CONCLUSIONS

The PLM/APSR fixation method was found to have the highest biomechanical stiffness followed by PTS, ATS, and AHPS fixation. The PLM/APSR fixation and AATS methods can be considered good procedures for stabilizing the atlantoaxial joints, although specific fixation methods are determined by the proper clinical and radiological characteristics in each patient.

Computer-assisted posterior instrumentation of the cervical and cervico-thoracic spine

Posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine has become increasingly popular in recent years. Dissatisfaction with lateral mass fixation, especially at the cervico-thoracic junction, has led spine surgeons to use pedicle screws. The improved biomechanical stability of pedicle screws and transarticular C1/2 screws allows for shorter instrumentations and improves the repositioning possibilities. Nevertheless, there are potential risks of iatrogenic damage to the spinal cord, nerve roots or the vertebral artery with both techniques. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether C1/2 transarticular screws and transpedicular screws can be applied safely and with high accuracy in the cervical spine and the cervico-thoracic junction using a computer-assisted surgery system (CAS system). Posterior instrumentation was performed using the Brainlab VectorVision System (BrainLAB, Heimstetten, Germany) in 19 patients. Surface matching was used for registration. We placed 22 transarticular screws C1/2, 31 cervical pedicle screws, 10 high thoracic pedicle screws and one lateral mass screw C1. The screw position was evaluated postoperatively using CT with multiplanar reconstruction in the screw axis of each screw. None of the transarticular screws or pedicle screws was significantly (>2 mm) misplaced and no screw-related injury to vascular, neurogenic or bony structures was observed. No screw revision was necessary. The mean operation time was 144 min (90-240 min) and the mean blood loss was 234 ml (50-800 ml). C1/2 transarticular screws, as well as transpedicular screws in the cervical spine and the cervico-thoracic junction, can be applied safely and with high accuracy using a CAS system. Computer-assisted instrumentation is recommended especially for pedicle screws at C3-C6.

Anterior instrumentation for traumatic C1-C2 instability

STUDY DESIGN

Technical note, case report. and review of literature.

OBJECTIVE

Description of anterior transarticular internal fixation for traumatic C1-C2 instability.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The currently effective posterior approaches for instrumentation of the C1-C2 junction require considerable soft tissue dissection and prone patient positioning. Some medical and anatomic conditions restrict the posterior approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An odontoid screw and anterior transarticular C1-C2 screws were used to instrument an unstable injury at this junction. The lesion consisted of a type II dens fracture and C1 ring disruption. Two high-quality fluoroscopy machines, a radiolucent OSI fracture table, and the Synframe (Synthes, Paoli, PA) retraction system are used for this procedure. The implant of choice is the 4.0-mm cannulated titanium screw.

RESULTS

At 4-month follow-up, successful stabilization without failure of hardware is documented. The patient's neurologic status is stable, with a minor residual left upper extremity motor deficit. The patient has restricted C-spine rotation but no neck pain with movement.

CONCLUSION

Anterior stabilization through a standard Smith-Robinson approach of the C1-C2 junction with screws into the odontoid and the lateral masses of C1 is effective. Supine positioning and minimal soft tissue dissection are advantages of this method over standard posterior transarticular instrumentation. Knowledge of the local anatomy, strict adherence to the operative protocol, and high-quality fluoroscopy avoid potential surgical complications.

Diagnosis and management of a metastatic tumor in the atlantoaxial spine

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained spine database was conducted.

OBJECTIVES

To review the experience of a large multidisciplinary tertiary referral oncology center in diagnosing and managing metastatic disease of the atlantoaxial spine in the era of magnetic resonance imaging, and to establish treatment parameters.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Published literature on the topic is limited, with conflicting opinions. Although external beam radiation therapy has proven value, some clinicians support aggressive surgical management.

METHODS

This study included all the patients who presented over a 6-year period to Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center with metastatic disease to the atlantoaxial spine. Demographics and diagnoses were obtained. Magnetic resonance images, computed tomography scans, and plain radiographs were reviewed. At presentation, patients with normal alignment or minimal subluxation were considered for nonoperative therapy, either external beam radiation therapy or chemotherapy. Surgery was reserved for patients with significant fracture subluxations, including atlantoaxial displacement more than 5 mm or angulation exceeding 11 degrees with displacement more than 3.5 mm. Additional operative indications were prior external beam radiation therapy administered to overlapping spinal ports, unknown primary pain, and persistent pain after nonoperative therapy. Patient outcome was evaluated for pain relief, neurologic outcomes, degree of spine involvement, and survival.

RESULTS

Symptomatic metastatic tumor involving the atlantoaxial spine was diagnosed in 33 patients. The mean age at presentation was 57 years. Histologic diagnoses varied widely. All the patients presented with severe mechanical neck pain, but no patient had myelopathy related to epidural tumor or fracture subluxation. Of these 33 patients, 25 patients initially were treated nonoperatively with either external beam radiation therapy (n = 23) or chemotherapy (n = 2), and 8 patients underwent initial operation. In this nonoperatively treated group, 23 of the 25 patients had significant pain resolution until death or last follow-up assessment. Five patients required subsequent operation: three for significant fracture subluxations and two after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of the fracture subluxations, two were present before external beam radiation therapy, and one was delayed from rapid tumor progression. Posterior instrumentation was performed in the 13 patients who underwent surgery. No patient required anterior decompression and stabilization. Significant pain resolution was achieved in all the surgically treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

External beam radiation therapy was used successfully to treat patients with normal alignment or minimal subluxation. Selected patients warrant immediate stabilization. Patients with persistent pain and inability to wean from a hard collar after nonoperative therapy also should be considered for surgery. Posterior stabilization provides pain relief and neurologic preservation or recovery without the need for anterior decompression.

Atlantoaxial instability in Dyggve-Melchior-Clausen syndrome. Case report and review of the literature

Dyggve-Melchior-Clausen (DMC) syndrome is a very rare disease. Only 58 cases have been reported in the literature. The syndrome is probably an autosomal recessive inherited disorder, one that is characterized by mental retardation, the short-spine type of dwarfism, and skeletal abnormalities, especially of the spine, hands, and pelvis. Atlantoaxial instability-induced spinal cord compression is a serious and preventable complication. The purpose of this report is to describe the first case of DMC syndrome in which anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw fixation was used to treat atlantoaxial instability. The authors report on a 17-year-old man with DMC syndrome and concomitant severe atlantoaxial instability. Computerized tomography scanning and magnetic resonance angiography demonstrated an irregular course of the vertebral artery (VA) at C-2, which made a posterior fixation procedure impossible. Additionally, transoral fusion was impossible because the patient was unable to open his mouth sufficiently. Therefore, the patient underwent anterior transarticular screw fixation. Follow-up examination 36 weeks after surgery showed solid fusion without implant failure. In conclusion, treatment of atlantoaxial instability in DMC syndrome must be considered. Specific care must be taken to determine the course of the VA. If posterior and transoral fusion are impossible, anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw fixation might be the only alternative.

A finite element investigation of upper cervical instrumentation

STUDY DESIGN

The finite element technique was used to predict changes in biomechanics that accompany the application of a novel instrumentation system designed for use in the upper cervical spine.

OBJECTIVE

To determine alterations in joint loading, kinematics, and instrumentation stresses in the craniovertebral junction after application of a novel instrumentation system. Specifically, this design was used to assess the changes in these parameters brought about by two different cervical anchor types: C2 pedicle versus C2-C1 transarticular screws, and unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Arthrodesis procedures can be difficult to obtain in the highly mobile craniovertebral junction. Solid fusion is most likely achieved when motion is eliminated. Biomechanical studies have shown that C1-C2 transarticular screws provide good stability in craniovertebral constructs; however, implantation of these screws is accompanied by risk of vertebral artery injury. A novel instrumentation system that can be used with transarticular screws or with C2 pedicle screws has been developed. This design also allows for unilateral or bilateral implantation. However, the authors are unaware of any reports to date on the changes in joint loading or instrumentation stresses that are associated with the choice of C2 anchor or unilateral/bilateral use.

METHODS

A ligamentous, nonlinear, sliding contact, three-dimensional finite element model of the C0-C1-C2 complex and a novel instrumentation system was developed. Validation of the model has been previously reported. Finite element models representing combinations of cervical anchor type (C1-C2 transarticular screws vs. C2 pedicle screws) and unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation were evaluated. All models were subjected to compression with pure moments in either flexion, extension, or lateral bending. Kinematic reductions with respect to the intact (uninjured and without instrumentation) case caused by instrumentation use were reported. Changes in loading profiles through the right and left C0-C1 and C1-C2 facets, transverse ligament-dens, and dens-anterior ring of C1 articulations were calculated by the finite element model. Maximum von Mises stresses within the instrumentation were predicted for each model variant and loading scenario.

RESULTS

Bilateral instrumentation provided greater motion reductions than the unilateral instrumentation. When used bilaterally, C2 pedicle screws approximate the kinematic reductions and instrumentation stresses (except in lateral bending) that are seen with C1-C2 transarticular screws. The finite element model predicted that the maximum stress was always in the region in which the plate transformed into the rod.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of predicting changes in loading in the upper cervical spine caused by instrumentation. The most significant conclusion that can be drawn from the finite element model predictions is that C2 pedicle screw fixation provides the same relative stability and instrumentation stresses as C1-C2 transarticular screw use. C2 pedicle screws can be a good alternative to C2-C1 transarticular screws when bilateral instrumentation is applied.