Hypoglossal nerve injury caused by halo-suspension traction. A case report

Finite element analysis of a new preoperative traction for cervical kyphosis: suspensory traction

A finite element model of cervical kyphosis was established to analyze the stress of cervical spine under suspensory traction and to explore the mechanism and effect of it. A patient with typical cervical kyphosis (C2-C5) underwent CT scan imaging, and 3D slicer was used to reconstruct the C2 to T2 vertebral bodies. The reconstructed data was imported into Hypermesh 2020 and Abaqus 2017 for meshing and finite element analysis. The changes of the kyphotic angle and the von Mises stress on the annulus fibrosus of each intervertebral disc and ligaments were analyzed under suspensory traction conditions. With the increase of suspensory traction weight, the overall kyphosis of cervical spine showed a decreasing trend. The correction of kyphosis was mainly contributed by the change of kyphotic segments. The kyphotic angle of C2-C5 was corrected from 45° to 13° finally. In cervical intervertebral discs, the stress was concentrated to anterior and posterior part, except for C4-5. The stress of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) decreased from the rostral to the caudal, and the high level von Mises stress of the kyphotic segments appeared at C2-C3, C3-C4, and C4-C5. The roles of the other ligaments were not obvious. The kyphotic angle was significantly reduced by the suspensory traction. Shear effect due to the high von Mises stress in the anterior and posterior parts of annulus fibrosus and the tension on the anterior longitudinal ligament play a role in the correction of cervical kyphosis.

Frontal correction assessment in severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery using halo gravity traction before to posterior vertebral arthrodesis: a multicenter retrospective observational study

PURPOSE

Preoperative preparation with halo gravity traction (HGT) has several advantages but is still controversial. A multicenter, observational, retrospective study was conducted to determine whether HGT provides better frontal correction in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2020, all patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) AIS with a Cobb angle greater than 80° were included. The included patients who underwent HGT were compared (complications rate and radiographic parameters) to patients who did not undergo traction (noHGT). For patients who underwent HGT, a spinal front X-ray at the end of the traction procedure was performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-four in noHGT and forty-seven in HGT group were analyzed with a 31-month mean follow-up. The mean ratio of Cobb angle correction was 58.8% in noHGT and 63.6% in HGT group (p = 0.023). In HGT, this ratio reached 9% if the traction lasted longer than 30 days (p = 0.009). The complication rate was 11.7% with a rate of 6.2% in noHGT and 19.1% in HGT group (p = 0.07). In patient whose preoperative Cobb angle was greater than 90°, the mean ratio of Cobb angle correction increases to 6.7% (p = 0.035) and the complications rate increased to 14% in the no HGT group and decreased to 13% in the HGT group (p = 0.9).

CONCLUSION

HGT preparation in the management of correction of AIS with a Cobb angle greater than 90° is a technique providing a greater frontal correction gain with similar complication rate than PSF correction alone. We recommend a minimum halo duration of 4 weeks.

Efficacy of Halo-Gravity Traction in the Perioperative Treatment of Severe Scoliosis and Kyphosis: A Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Patients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of halo-gravity traction (HGT) with subsequent surgical treatment in adolescent and adult patients with severe scoliosis by evaluating the radiographic outcomes and clinical complications.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 51 patients with severe scoliosis who underwent a posterior spinal instrumented fusion with HGT during the perioperative period between March 2010 and June 2017. The patients were divided into 2 groups: adults (age >18 years) and adolescents (age 10-18 years). All patients were followed with full posteroanterior and lateral spine radiographs, bending films, neurological complications, and lung function tests for a minimum of 2 years. Deformity correction, pulmonary function testing, and clinical complications were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

We identified 29 adults (8 males and 21 females, mean age = 23.7 ± 8.7 years) and 22 adolescents (10 males and 12 females, mean age = 13.0 ± 4.5 years). In the adult group, the mean Cobb angle of the main curve before HGT was 141.7 ± 18.2°, which improved to 126.4 ± 8.6° and 67.5 ± 10.2° after traction and operation, respectively. The kyphotic angle was corrected from 137.1 ± 15.6° before traction to 122.5 ± 11.3° after traction to 67.6 ± 13.8° after operation. The mean functional vital capacity% and forced expiratory volume in one second% were 43.1% and 37.5%, which improved to 46.7% and 41.7% after traction, respectively. In the adolescent group, the mean correction of the main curve improved from 139.3 ± 12.6° before traction to 112.1 ± 8.3° after traction to 59 ± 13.1° after surgical intervention. The kyphotic angle was corrected from 130.7 ± 9.4° before traction to 101.5 ± 12.2° after traction and then to 48.2 ± 10.1° after surgical intervention. Overall, patients in both groups showed significant improvement in their main scoliosis and kyphosis (P < 0.05), while the correction rate of the main curve and kyphosis was significantly higher in the adolescent group than that in the adult group (P < 0.05). The functional vital capacity% increased from 44.8% to 55.0% and the forced expiratory volume in one second% increased from 44.0% to 51.0% after using HGT. In terms of surgical outcomes, the incidence of postoperative neurological complications was 27.6% and 18.2% in the 2 groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HGT is an effective and safe method to correct spinal deformities and improve lung function, especially in adolescent patients with severe scoliosis. In addition, it can potentially reduce the risk of neurological complications and the level of osteotomy in posterior spinal instrumented fusion surgery.

The Use of Halo Gravity Traction in Severe, Stiff Scoliosis

PURPOSE

The correction of severe, stiff scoliosis in children is challenging. One method used to reduce the risk is preoperative halo gravity traction (HGT). In this study, the authors sought to define the efficiency and safety of HGT and characterize the chronology of the correction seen.

METHOD

A consecutive group of pediatric patients with severe spinal deformities was treated with HGT before definitive correction. A standard protocol with the daily addition of weight to 50% of body weight at 3 weeks was used. Traction remained in place until signs of impending neurological complication or 6 weeks, whichever was sooner.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were included with a mean age of 11.8 years. The mean coronal deformity was 123 degrees, with a T1-L5 height of 234 mm. The mean duration of traction was 42 days with a mean improvement in height of 72 mm with 82% occurring over the first 3 weeks. Hundred percent of the angular and 98% of T1-L5 height correction was reached by 6 weeks.One patient showed early signs of a cranial nerve palsy prompting early surgery and 8 patients showed pin loosening, 1 of which required revision of their halo. One patient underwent a slower progression of traction because of transitory urinary disturbance. Following fusion, angular correction of the major curve was 49%.

CONCLUSION

HGT is a safe treatment for severe, stiff scoliosis because it can respond to early signs of impending neurological impairment. The first 3 weeks of treatment, reaching 50% of body weight as a traction force accounts for 80% of correction, with the remaining 20% in the following 2 weeks. At least 4 weeks of traction is recommended when following this protocol.

The safety and efficacy of one-stage posterior surgery in the treatment of presumed adolescent idiopathic scoliosis associated with intraspinal abnormalities a minimum 3-year follow-up comparative study

PURPOSE

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common type of idiopathic scoliosis. Previous studies reported that the incidence of intraspinal abnormalities among the presumed idiopathic scoliosis was 13-43%. Intraspinal abnormalities were also considered increasing the risks of progressing of scoliosis and neurological complications following scoliosis corrective surgery. The surgical strategy of presumed adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (PAIS) associated with intraspinal abnormalities remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether one-stage posterior surgery safe and effective for the PAIS patients associated with intraspinal abnormalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and thirteen consecutive patients who underwent one-stage posterior correction surgery were included. Thirty PAIS patients with intraspinal abnormalities without preoperative neurological symptoms were matched with eighty-three AIS patients for sex, age, blood loss, operating time, number of levels and location of instrumentation and curve magnitude. Radiographic and clinical parameters of the patients were evaluated before surgery, within 1 week after surgery, and more than 3 years at the last follow-up for complications and changes in main curve correction, global coronal balance, thoracic kyphosis, sagittal vertical axis, and ODI scores.

RESULTS

On average, the duration of follow-up was 51.5 months in the PAIS group compared to 52.5 months in the AIS group. The preoperative mean major coronal curve was 79.6° (ranged 56.2°-106.7°) and improved to 22.4° (ranged 6.4°-58.1°) at the last follow-up for a 71.9% of correction in the AIS group. The preoperative mean major coronal curve was 80.4° (ranged 63.4°-108.1°) and improved to 23.2° (ranged 4.8°-66.2°) at the last follow-up for a 71.1% of correction in PAIS group. The preoperative ODI score was 32.4 (10-42) in the PAIS group and improved to 11.4 (4-22) at last follow-up, 33.4 (12-42) in the AIS group and improved to 11.5 (5-22) at last follow-up. The global coronal balance, TK and SVA were all significantly improved after surgery and maintained to the last follow-up in the two groups. The neurological complications were observed in 3.3% of PAIS patients and 3.6% of AIS patients. No statistical difference in the parameters between the two groups was observed at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

One-stage posterior corrective surgery is safe and effective in PAIS patients associated with intraspinal abnormalities without preoperative neurological symptoms. Surgical guidelines of AIS are appropriate for the treatment of PAIS patients associated with intraspinal abnormalities.

Perioperative Halo-Gravity Traction in the Treatment of Scoliosis with Intraspinal Anomalies

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of preoperative halo-gravity traction and 1-stage posterior surgery for the treatment of scoliosis with intramedullary anomalies.

METHODS

A total of 11 patients with scoliosis with intramedullary anomalies were evaluated. All patients were treated with preoperative halo-gravity traction and 1-stage posterior surgery. The average age was 11.4 years (range, 7-21 years). All patients were followed-up for at least 2 years (mean, 3.5 years; range, 2-5 years). Their radiologic presentations and complications were reviewed.

RESULTS

The operating time was 7.9 hours, and the intraoperative bleeding amount was 1890 mL. Both the Cobb angle of scoliosis and kyphosis were significantly improved after halo-gravity traction and the operation (P < 0.05). Tethered cords were released, and intraspinal masses (neurofibromatosis and lipoma) were excised. Syringomyelia and split spinal cord malformations were left untreated. None of the patients experienced deterioration in their neurologic status after surgery. No severe complications, such as infection, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, failed internal fixation, or fractured pedicle screws or rods occurred after the operation. There was no deterioration of neurologic function, delayed infection, or pseudoarthrosis during the follow-up visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative halo-gravity traction and 1-stage posterior surgery provided patients who had scoliosis and intramedullary anomalies an effective and safe treatment option with few complications.

Halo-gravity traction for the treatment of pediatric cervical spine disorders

OBJECTIVE

Halo-gravity traction (HGT) is an effective and safe method for gradual correction of severe cervical deformities in adults. However, the literature is limited on the use of HGT for cervical spine deformities that develop in children. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HGT for pediatric cervical spine deformities.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients (18 females) whose mean age was 11.3 ± 5.58 years (range 2-24.9 years) underwent HGT. Common indications included kyphosis (n = 12), rotatory subluxation (n = 7), and basilar invagination (n = 6). Three children (11%) received traction to treat severe occipitocervical instability. For these 3 patients, traction combined with a halo vest, with bars attached rigidly to the vest, but with the ability to slide through the connections to the halo crown, was used to guide the corrective forces and moments in a specific and controlled manner. Patients ambulated with a wheelchair or halo walker under constant traction. Imaging was done before and during traction to evaluate traction efficacy. The modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink classification was used to categorize complications.

RESULTS

The mean duration of HGT was 25 days (IQR 13-29 days), and the mean traction was 29% ± 13.0% of body weight (IQR 19%-40% of body weight). The mean kyphosis improved from 91° ± 20.7° (range 64°-122°) to 56° ± 17.6° (range 32°-96°) during traction and corresponded to a mean percentage kyphosis correction of 38% ± 13.8% (range 21%-57%). Twenty-five patients (89%) underwent surgical stabilization, and 3 patients (11%) had rotatory subluxation that was adequately reduced by traction and were treated with a halo vest as their definitive treatment. The mean hospital stay was 35 days (IQR 17-43 days).Nine complications (32%) occurred: 8 grade I complications (28%), including 4 cases of superficial pin-site infection (14%) and 4 cases of transient paresthesia (14%). One grade II complication (4%) was seen in a child with Down syndrome and a preexisting neurological deficit; this patient developed flaccid paralysis that rapidly resolved with weight removal. Six cases (21%) of temporary neck discomfort occurred as a sequela of a preexisting condition and resolved without treatment within 24-48 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

HGT in children is safe and effective for the gradual correction of cervical kyphosis, atlantoaxial subluxation, basilar invagination, and os odontoideum. Cervical traction is an additional tool for the pediatric spine surgeon if uncertainties exist that the spinal alignment required for internal fixation and deformity correction can be safely achieved surgically. Common complications included grade I complications such as superficial pin-site infections and transient paresthesias. Halo vest gravity traction may be warranted in patients with baseline neurological deficits and severe occipitocervical instability to reduce the chance of catastrophic movement.

Halo Gravity Traction Can Mitigate Preoperative Risk Factors and Early Surgical Complications in Complex Spine Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine the role of halo gravity traction (HGT) in reducing preoperative surgical risk.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The impact of HGT on procedure choice, preoperative risk factors, and surgical complications has not been previously described.

METHODS

Patients treated with HGT before primary surgery were included. The FOCOS Score (FS) was used to quantify operative risk. FS was calculated using patient-factors (ASIA, body mass index, etiology), procedure-factors (PcF; osteotomy planned, number of levels fused, etc.), and curve magnitude (CM). Scores ranged from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating increased risk. FS was calculated before and after HGT to see how changes in FS affected complication rates.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients were included. Halo-related complications occurred in 34% of patients but revision was required in only 8.3%. Average FS improved by 18 points after HGT. CM, PcF, and patient-factors all improved (P < 0.05). The greatest changes were in CM and PcF. The planned rate of three-column osteotomies dropped from 91% to 38% after HGT. FS (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.68, P = 0.023) and change in FS (AUC: 0.781, P < 0.001) was successfully able to predict the rate of surgical complications. A preoperative FS of 74 was identified as a cut-off for a higher rate of surgical complications (sensitivity 58.8%, specificity 74.7%). Patients with a reduction in FS <  = 10pts were five times more likely to have a complication (relative risk 5.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-14.6, P < 0.001). A multivariate regression showed that change in FS was an independent predictor of complication rates (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

FS can successfully predict surgical risk in pediatric patients with complex spinal deformity. Preoperative HGT can reduce FS and surgical risk by improving CM, lowering three-column osteotomies use, and improving body mass index. A reduction in FS after HGT predicts a lower rate of surgical complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Hypoglossal Nerve Palsy as a Cause of Severe Dysphagia along with the Oropharyngeal Stenosis due to Occipitocervical Kyphosis

Hypoglossal nerve palsy (HNP) is a potential cause of dysphagia. A 66-year-old man presented to our hospital with dysphagia and neck pain. One year prior to his first visit, he had been diagnosed with upper cervical tuberculosis and had undergone posterior C1-2 fixation. The physical examination led to the diagnosis of dysphagia with HNP, and he had severe weight loss. Radiographic examination revealed that the O-C kyphosis had been exacerbated and that the deformity was likely the primary cause of HNP. To restore the swallowing function, O-C fusion surgery was performed. Postoperatively, the patient showed immediate improvement of dysphagia with gradual recovery of hypoglossal nerve function. In the last follow-up evaluation, swallowing function was confirmed with no signs of HNP. Our results indicate that HNP could be more prevalent in cases with severe cervical kyphosis, being underdiagnosed due to the more apparent signs of the oropharyngeal narrowing.

Radiographic, Pulmonary, and Clinical Outcomes With Halo Gravity Traction

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center retrospective chart review.

OBJECTIVES AND SUMMARY

Halo gravity traction (HGT) is a safe and effective intervention to improve spinal deformity prior to corrective instrumentation. Our study aimed to report on a large series of patients undergoing HGT, demonstrate the correlation between thoracic height achieved and pulmonary function, and evaluate the efficacy of nutritional assessment and intervention while in HGT for these often malnourished or nutritionally compromised patients.

METHODS

107 patients underwent HGT for severe spinal deformity. Major coronal and sagittal Cobb angles, T1-T12 ht, and T1-S1 ht were collected pre-HGT, during HGT, postoperation, and 2 years postoperation. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) recorded forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Nutritional interventions such as formal nutrition consult, resulting nutritional supplementation, or interventions were recorded.

RESULTS

Patients were in HGT for mean of 82.1 days and mean maximum percentage body weight in traction was 49.5%. Mean major coronal Cobb angle prior to HGT was 92.6°, improving to 65.8° in maximal traction and to 47° after surgical intervention. Traction accounted for 78% of T1-T12 height and 79% of T1-S1 length gains from pre- to postoperation. We showed a positive correlation between gain in T1-T12 height and percentage predicted changes in FVC and FEV1. Weight Z score for the entire cohort of patients improved from -2.8 pretraction to -2.4 in traction and then to -2.3 postoperative.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study again demonstrated that HGT achieves radiographic improvement safely and effectively in severe spinal deformity. We demonstrated a positive correlation between improvement in PFTs and increase in thoracic height seen with HGT. Additionally, improvement in weight Z score was seen in the entire population and the most at risk patients for malnutrition, results that have not been shown before.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Use of Halo-Gravity Traction and a Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod for Untreated Severe Kyphoscoliosis in an Adolescent: A Case Report

CASE

We utilized a novel staged approach for an adolescent with severe kyphoscoliosis; it involved 8 weeks of initial halo-gravity traction as well as implantation and expansion (every 2 weeks) of a magnetically controlled growing rod over 6 months, followed by spinal fusion. The patient was a 13-year-old girl with an untreated idiopathic deformity (thoracic scoliosis with a curve of 145° and kyphosis with a curve of 120°). No osteotomies other than inferior facetectomies were required at the final fusion, and the final scoliosis curve was 57°, a correction of 60.7%.

CONCLUSION

The staged approach resulted in a straightforward, safe, gradual correction of severe kyphoscoliosis. We consider this an option for patients with scoliosis with a curve of ≥130° on initial presentation.

Preoperative Halo-Gravity Traction for Severe Thoracic Kyphoscoliosis Patients from Tibet: Radiographic Correction, Pulmonary Function Improvement, Nursing, and Complications

Background

This study investigated the outcomes of preoperative HGT as an adjunct treatment for severe thoracic kyphoscoliosis, its role in radiographic correction, and pulmonary function improvement, together with nursing strategy and incidence of complications.

Material/Methods

Eleven patients with a mean age of 18.8 years were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: patients with severe kyphoscoliosis (coronal Cobb angle and kyphosis angle ≥80°); duration of HGT ≥8 weeks; patients undergoing HGT for at least 12 h per day; traction weight no less than 40% of body weight; and patients not receiving physical therapies. All patients underwent respiratory training.

Results

The major coronal curve scoliosis averaged 114.00±24.43° and was reduced to 80.55±17.98° after HGT. The major kyphosis was 103.91±18.95° and was reduced to 80.55±17.98°. Significantly improved percent-predicted values for FVC was found after HGT (p=0.014), and significantly increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1%) was also observed (p<0.001), with significantly improved percent-predicted values for PEF (p=0.003) after HGT.

Conclusions

Our data reveal that preoperative HGT can be performed safely, and can help achieve excellent curve correction in both the coronal and sagittal planes, together with improved respiratory function and no severe complications in patients with severe thoracic kyphoscoliosis.

Strategies for Surgical Management of Large, Stiff Spinal Deformities in Children

Management of large, severe, stiff spinal deformities in children can be challenging. Adjunctive treatments used in conjunction with spinal osteotomy, instrumentation, and fusion can improve the ultimate degree of deformity correction. These adjunctive treatments include preoperative halo-gravity traction, intraoperative halo-femoral traction, temporary internal spinal distraction, and anterior spinal release. Each of these techniques has unique indications and individual risks. When the appropriate protocols are followed, these techniques can be safe and efficacious.

Posterior-only surgery with preoperative skeletal traction for management of severe scoliosis

PURPOSE

The surgical treatment of severe adolescent spinal deformities is challenging and carries substantial risks of mortality and morbidity. To mitigate this risk, surgeons have employed various methods as this study designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of preoperative halo-femoral or halo gravity traction (HGT) followed by posterior-only surgery in the management of severe scoliosis.

METHOD

A total number of 23 patients with severe scoliosis treated by preoperative skeletal traction (halo gravity or halo femoral) followed by posterior fusion and instrumentation in one stage. All patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

The average age of the patients was 12.7 years at the time of surgery. Mean of the Cobb angle improved from 99.9° ± 8.2° preoperatively to 75.3° ± 8° post-traction and 49.5° ± 7.7° postoperatively. Kyphosis angle corrected from 56.4° ± 9.5° to 38.6° ± 5.8°. The preop-FVC% was 41 ± 6.1% and after 1 year follow-up FVC% was 45.7 ± 7.7%. No patients required an anterior release due to amount of their deformity.

DISCUSSION

Despite the benefits of modern instrumentation procedures, the treatment of severe scoliosis can be very competing. We think that by applying preoperative halo femoral traction and halo-gravity traction, managing severe scoliosis will be in safe and easy manner and can lead to better deformity correction and less neurological complications and facilitate to avoid anterior operation for severe scoliosis and its related complications.

Two-staged Correction of Severe Congenital Scoliosis Associated With Intraspinal Abnormalities

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the efficacy and safety of perioperative halo-gravity traction as an adjunct to posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) in the treatment of patients with severe congenital scoliosis and coexisting asymptomatic intraspinal pathologies (diastematomyelia and/or tethered cord).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Few reports to our knowledge review the use of perioperative halo-gravity traction and PVCR in this patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 17 patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up who underwent PVCR using perioperative halo-gravity traction were analyzed. Patients were analyzed by age at date of examination (range, 11-23 y; mean, 14.4 y), sex (7 male, 10 female), major coronal curve magnitude (range, 108-149 degrees; average, 125 degrees), major sagittal curve magnitude (range, 72-118 degrees; average, 91 degrees). Complications related to halo traction and PVCR were reviewed.

RESULTS

Radiographic outcomes demonstrated Cobb angle of major curve had an average correction of 28% after halo traction and it measured 53 degrees (range, 42-84 degrees) at the last follow-up, for a 58% correction. Maximal kyphosis improved to 58 degrees (range, 43-76 degrees) at ultimate follow-up. There were no permanent neurological deficits in this series.

CONCLUSIONS

The study results suggested that surgical treatment for intraspinal abnormality may be unnecessary in asymptomatic patients with severe congenital scoliosis who are undergoing scoliosis corrective surgery. PVCR combined with perioperative traction is a safe and effective alternative for such patients.

Halogravity traction in the preoperative treatment of scoliosis in twins with Marfan syndrome

We report on the influence of the duration of halogravity traction for achieving curve correction in monozygotic twins with Marfan syndrome who underwent posterior spinal fusion. Review of the medical charts and standard radiograph analysis of twin girls treated at our department was performed. Halogravity traction with a four-pin skull construct was applied for 3 weeks in twin A and for 2 weeks in twin B with a maximum of 20% body weight used. Both were on a 24-hours-day halogravity traction regime. Achieved thoracic curve correction after halogravity traction was 31% in twin A and 18% in twin B. Although less curve correction after traction was achieved in twin B, this had no significant implications on final postoperative curve correction. Halogravity traction can be a useful tool in the preoperative treatment of scoliosis in patients with Marfan syndrome if applied for 3 weeks. In order to avoid complications, we propose that lower weights be used with a starting weight of 1.5 kg increased by 1 kg daily until 20% body weight is reached.

Preoperative halo-gravity traction for severe spinal deformities at an SRS-GOP site in West Africa: protocols, complications, and results

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected single-center database.

OBJECTIVE

We describe a modified halo-gravity traction (HGT) protocol for patients with severe spinal deformities in West Africa, and assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Three-column osteotomies are frequently used in the correction of severe spinal deformities; however, these can be associated with high complication rates and significant risk for neurological injury. Preoperative traction is one modality used to obtain a partial correction prior to definitive fusion. Low numbers and variability of traction protocols, however, have limited previous reports of sustained HGT.

METHODS

All patients who underwent HGT in Ghana from April 2012 to August 2013 were reviewed. HGT was started at 20% body weight and increased by 10% per week until 50% body weight was reached by 4 weeks or thereafter as tolerated. Demographic variables, operative data, radiographic parameters, and health-related quality of life scores were collected. A deformity reduction index was calculated at each time point by summing the scoliosis and abnormal kyphosis for each patient and reported as a percentage of the preoperative deformity.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients underwent HGT for an average 107 days prior to definitive posterior spinal fusion (24 patients) or placement of growing rods (5 patients). The major curve improved from an average 131° to 90° (31%) after HGT, and to an average 57° (56%) postoperatively. Pure kyphotic curves were rigid (flexibility 22% after traction), with a correction index of 3.88, which is similar to historical controls. Deformity correction with HGT plateaued at 63 days. Overall Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire scores improved significantly pretraction versus postoperatively, but there was no change after traction versus before traction. There were 11 pin tract infections, with no neurological complications.

CONCLUSION

HGT is a safe method to partially correct severe spinal deformities prior to a definitive procedure, and may reduce the need for higher risk 3-column osteotomies. Importantly, kyphosis secondary to infection with spontaneous apical ankylosis is relatively resistant to HGT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

The efficacy of preoperative halo-gravity traction in pediatric spinal deformity the effect of traction duration

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review

OBJECTIVE

To assess the appropriate length of halo-gravity traction that provides the most preoperative correction and minimizes halo associated complications.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND

Rapid correction of severe scoliosis increases the risk of neurological compromise. To minimize complications, some patients undergo preoperative halo traction providing gradual correction before definitive management. The appropriate length of traction to provide the most preoperative correction is unknown.

METHODS

Twenty pediatric patients (age: range, 220 y, average 11.2 y) with severe operative scoliosis, kyphoscoliosis, or kyphosis were retrospectively studied. The major structural coronal curves before traction (n = 11 patients, 19 curves, range 44128 degrees, average 84.7 degrees) or immediately after anterior release (n = 7 patients, 10 curves, range 3598 degrees, average 67.7 degrees) were measured as well as weekly during traction and postoperatively at 1 year. Sagittal kyphosis (n = 12 patients, range 60143 degrees, average 97.6 degrees) was measured at the same time intervals. Patients in traction(maximum traction weight range 15.5% to 46.5% of bodyweight, average 32.9%) for a duration of at least 3 weeks (range 310.5 wk, average 4.6 wk) were included. Patients with prior surgical fusion were excluded; however, patients who under went a stage anterior-posterior were included. Halo-traction related complications were noted in each case.

RESULTS

The major coronal and sagittal curve corrected 66.3% and 62.7% (change in curve per week/total change in curve), respectively at 2 weeks (n = 29, 12 curves), 21.7% and 24.3% at 3 weeks (n = 29, 12), and 7.5% and 15.9% at 4 weeks (n = 14,6). Traction-related complications during the traction duration included 2 cases of ileus, 1 respiratory complication, 2 pin loosening, and 1 superficial pin infection.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of severe scoliosis can be very challenging. The use of long-term halo traction preoperatively can assist in the surgical correction. The majority of correction occurs during the first 2 weeks of traction. No permanent neurological complications occurred during traction.

Three-staged correction of severe rigid idiopathic scoliosis using limited halo-gravity traction

INTRODUCTION

Despite the advantages of modern instrumentation techniques, the treatment of severe rigid idiopathic scoliosis could be very demanding. Traction can provide better, safer correction and minimize complications related to forceful intra-operative maneuvers; however, several side effects are associated with prolonged periods of traction. The aim of this work is to review the clinical and radiographic results of limited perioperative halo-gravity traction in severe rigid curves analyzing its efficacy, advantages and possible complications and comparing it to classic two staged corrections performed without traction.

METHODS

A retrospective case control study including 47 adolescents with severe rigid idiopathic scoliosis divided into two groups; a consecutive series of 21 patients who had a three-staged correction by an anterior release, 2 weeks of halo-gravity traction then posterior instrumentation (TRN group); compared to an earlier series of 26 consecutive patients treated without traction (SAP group). The average age was 18 years + 1 month and 16 years + 2 months, respectively. The average preoperative dorsal and lumbar curves for (TRN) group were 106.5° and 87°, respectively, and for (SAP) group were 102° and 81°, respectively.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up for an average of 6 years (range 3-8 years). A significantly better correction was achieved in (TRN) group (average 59%) compared to (SAP) group (average 47%). At final follow-up, the loss of correction had an average of 8° for (TRN) group and 11° for (SAP) group. A shorter hospital stay was found in (SAP) group; a shorter operative time was found in (TRN) group and there was no significant difference in blood loss, early or delayed complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited halo-gravity traction is an efficient, safe modality in the treatment of severe rigid adolescent scoliosis. The application of gradual traction over a limited period of 2 weeks led to better correction, shorter operative time with no significant complications.

Avaliação pré-operatória visando ao uso do halo craniano no tratamento de deformidades rígidas da coluna vertebral

OBJETIVO: avaliar a eficácia e a segurança do uso do halo craniano gravitacional como técnica de tratamento de deformidades rígidas da coluna vertebral e rever complicações associadas ao seu tratamento. MÉTODOS: análise retrospectiva de dez pacientes com deformidades rígidas da coluna vertebral: cifose, escoliose, cifoescoliose e hiperlordose cervical. O critério para inclusão dos pacientes foi o uso do halo craniano gravitacional em um período pré-operatório e interoperatório em deformidades rígidas da coluna vertebral. Foram avaliados os prontuários dos pacientes e suas mensurações radiográficas foram feitas em um período pré-operatório, após instalação do halo craniano gravitacional, e no período pós-operatório. As variáveis estudadas foram idade, sexo, valor angular da curva principal, valor angular da curva secundária, valor angular da curva sagital maior, protocolo de tração e tipo de procedimento utilizado. RESULTADOS: em relação ao plano frontal, avaliou-se, no período pré-operatório, a média angular de 89,9º, decrescendo para 65º após a instalação do halo e 56,9º no pós-operatório. Analisando o plano sagital, observou-se no período pré-operatório o valor angular de 77,7º, decrescendo para 55,4º, com o uso do halo-colete, e 46,5º no pós-operatório tardio. CONCLUSÃO: pode-se concluir que o uso da tração halo craniana é um método eficaz no auxílio da correção das deformidades rígidas da coluna vertebral, visto que se conseguiu uma correção significativa das deformidades do período pré-operatório para os períodos pós-instalação do halo e pós-operatório, sem se observar lesão neurológica ou outra grave complicação.

Efficacy of perioperative halo-gravity traction for treatment of severe scoliosis (≥100°)

BACKGROUND

There have been no standardized surgical options for severe scoliotic curvatures ≥100°. Halo-gravity traction is a viable option for surgical treatment of severe scoliosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative halo-gravity traction for scoliosis curves ≥100° with respect to radiographic outcomes and clinical complications.

METHODS

A total of 21 scoliosis patients with ≥100° curves (average 118.7°; range 100°-158°) with a minimum 2-year follow-up (average 41.8 months; range 24.0-97.0 months) who underwent spinal instrumented fusion using perioperative halo-gravity traction were analyzed. Diagnoses were neuromuscular scoliosis (n = 10), idiopathic (n = 9), and congenital (n = 2). In all, 15 patients were treated by the anterior release procedure followed by final posterior fusion and 6 patients by posterior fusion alone. Six patients had only preoperative traction preceding posterior fusion alone, 6 patients only staged traction between anterior release and final posterior fusion, and 9 patients had both preoperative traction preceding anterior release and staged traction preceding final posterior fusion. The average overall traction period in all patients was 67 days (range 10-78 days).

RESULTS

Radiographic outcomes demonstrated 51.3% correction of the major Cobb angle, 40 mm correction of apical vertebral translation, 76 mm increase of T1-S1 length, and 20.7% increase of space available for lungs at the ultimate follow-up (all comparisons P < 0.05). Preoperative traction demonstrated 27.5% correction of the major curve Cobb angle, 51.5 mm increase of T1-S1 length, 14.9% increase of space available for the lungs (all comparisons P < 0.05). Staged traction after anterior release demonstrated 37.2% correction of the major curve Cobb angle, 26.1 mm correction of apical vertebral translation, 56.5 mm increase of T1-S1 length, 14.2% increase of space available for the lungs (all comparisons P < 0.05). There were only two patients with a pin-site problem, and one required débridement. There were no neurological deficits or clinical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Scoliosis patients with ≥100° curves can be managed successfully by corrective fusion surgery concomitant with perioperative halo-gravity traction without significant complications.

Posterior multilevel vertebral osteotomy for correction of severe and rigid neuromuscular scoliosis: a preliminary study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness and correction with posterior multilevel vertebral osteotomy in severe and rigid curves without anterior release.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

For the correction of severe and rigid scoliotic curve, anterior-posterior combined or posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) procedures are used. Anterior procedure might compromise pulmonary functions, and PVCR might carry risk of neurologic injuries. Therefore, authors developed a new technique, which reduces both.

METHODS

Thirteen neuromuscular patients (7 cerebral palsy, 2 Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and 4 spinal muscular atrophy) who had rigid curve >100 degrees were prospectively selected. All were operated with posterior-only approach using pedicle screw construct. To achieve desired correction, posterior multilevel vertebral osteotomies were performed at 3 to 5 levels (apex, and 1-2 levels above and below apex) through partial laminotomy sites connecting from concave to convex side, just above the pedicle; and repeated cantilever manipulation was applied over temporary short-segment fixation, above and below the apex, on convex side. On concave side, rod was assembled with screws and rod-derotation maneuver was performed. Finally, short-segment fixation on convex side was replaced with full-length construct. Intraoperative MEP monitoring was applied in all.

RESULTS

Mean age was 21 years and average follow-up was 25 months. Average preoperative flexibility was 20.3% (24.1 degrees). Average Cobb's angle, pelvic obliquity, and apical rotation were 118.2 degrees, 16.7 degrees, and 57 degrees preoperatively, respectively, and 48.8 degrees, 8 degrees, and 43 degrees after surgery showing significant correction of 59.4%, 46.1%, and 24.5%. Average number of osteotomy level was 4.2 and average blood loss was 3356 +/- 884 mL. Mean operation time was 330 +/- 46 minutes. None of the patient required postoperative ventilator support or displayed any signs of neurologic or vascular injuries during or after the operation.

CONCLUSION

This technique should be recommended because (1) it provides release of anterior column without anterior approach and (2) our results supports its superiority as a technique.

Complications of halo use in children

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate complications of halo use in children.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Halos have been used in children for correction of spinal deformity and immobilization of the spine. Complications of halo use in children have been reported, including pin-site complications and neurologic injury from halo traction. The purpose of this report is to report on complications of halo use in children.

METHODS

The medical records of 68 patients treated with a halo for correction of spinal deformity or immobilization from 1996 to 2005 were reviewed. Mean age of children was 10 (1-20) years. The halo device was used to apply traction for correction of spinal deformity in 31 patients, and immobilization alone with halo vest in 37 patients.

RESULTS

The overall rates of complications are significant at 53% (36/68). Pin-site complications included 13 infections successfully treated with oral antibiotics and 4 pins that needed to be removed. Two pins were replaced due to skull penetration, and 1 scar site was surgically revised. There were a total of 9 neurologic complications that occurred in 7 of 31 patients undergoing halo traction (31% incidence), including 3 cranial nerve injuries, 1 Horner syndrome, 4 extremity weaknesses, and 1 bradycardia. All traction-related neurologic problems resolved with removal or decrease of the magnitude of traction, with 4 cases improving immediately, 3 cases within 2 days, and the 2 other cases resolving in 1 and 5 months. Lastly, there were 7 vest-related complications including 5 pressure sores, 1 cracking of the vest, and 1 halo-vest readjustment.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest reported series of halo use in children. The overall rate of complications is 53% (36/68), and 10% (7/68) of children required unanticipated surgery for treatment of these complications. The most common complication was pin-site infections, with 76% (13/17) of these resolving with oral antibiotics alone. Traction-related neurologic injuries that occurred were common, 31% (9/31) but all resolved with a decrease or removal of traction weight, with complete resolution occurring immediately in 4 of 9 events. We recommend serial neurologic examinations of children in halo traction, with immediate removal or decrease in weights at the first sign of injury.

The use of traction in the treatment of severe spinal deformity

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, retrospective, nonrandomized comparison group study of patients with severe scoliosis and kyphosis treated after 1995 with halo-gravity traction and without halo-gravity traction before definitive fusion.

OBJECTIVE

Compare surgical correction of severe spine deformity with preoperative halo traction and without preoperative traction.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Prior studies have demonstrated that halo traction is a safe, well-tolerated method of applying gradual, sustained traction to maximize operative correction in patients with severe idiopathic scoliosis (IS) and kyphosis. However, these studies lack a comparison control group and study only a relatively small number of patients with IS.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients with severe scoliosis or kyphosis were studied using hospital records, standing preoperative, traction, postoperative, and final radiographs. Thirty were treated with traction and 23 were treated without traction. Patients within each group were analyzed based on demographics, diagnosis, perioperative, and radiographic data. In addition, patients were evaluated based on diagnosis, specifically whether patients had adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

RESULTS

Within the entire study population, there was no statistically significant difference in main coronal curve correction (62% vs. 59%), operative time, blood loss, and total complication rate (27% vs. 52%). However, the nontraction group underwent vertebral column resection more often (30% vs. 3%, P = 0.015). The traction group had a statistically significant increase in average hospital stay (36 vs. 14 days) (P = 0.011). Analysis of the 23 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis also showed no statistically significant differences in curve correction, blood loss, or complications.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that patients with halo traction less frequently had a vertebral body resection, but achieved comparable deformity correction.

Posterior only pedicle screw instrumentation with intraoperative halo-femoral traction in the surgical treatment of severe scoliosis (>100 degrees)

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

OBJECTIVE

To report the results of surgical correction achieved by intraoperative halo-femoral traction and posterior only pedicle screw instrumentation in severe scoliosis (scoliosis greater than 100 degrees ).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although previous reports show the effectiveness of preoperative halo traction in the treatment of severe spinal deformity, the intraoperative use of halo-femoral traction in conjunction with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation has never been reported in patients with severe spinal deformity.

METHODS

A total of 15 consecutive patients with severe (>100 degrees) thoracic idiopathic scoliosis and/or kyphoscoliosis operated by using intraoperative halo-femoral traction and posterior only pedicle screw instrumentation were included in the study. Subjects were analyzed by age at date of examination, gender, major coronal curve magnitude, major compensatory coronal curve magnitude, major sagittal curve magnitude, shoulder imbalance, and preoperative vital capacity of the lungs. Halo-traction related complications and short- and long-term complications were noted in each case.

RESULTS

The average age at the time of surgery was 17.8 years (range, 16-19). There were 4 males and 11 females. The average improvement was 51% in the major thoracic curve, 33% in the compensatory lumbar curve, and 53% in the major sagittal curve. The average follow-up was 56 (range, 24-96) months. Loss of correction averaged 4 degrees for major thoracic curves and 2 degrees for thoracic kyphosis based on measurements at the final follow-up date.

CONCLUSION

The use of intraoperative halo-femoral traction together with the wide facet resection and posterior release gradually provide a good correction and balance maintained by pedicle screw instrumentation. Intraoperative halo-femoral traction not only elongates spinal column but also elongates the thoracic cavity improving the compromised pulmonary function.

Effectiveness of spinal release and halo-femoral traction in the management of severe spinal deformity

The purpose of this retrospective review was to assess the effectiveness of spinal release and halo-femoral traction in the management of severe spinal deformity. Twenty-four patients had halo-femoral traction and a spinal release. Analysis focused on pre-traction curve, preoperative curve in bending or hyperextension films, final traction curve, traction weight as a percent of body weight, and complications associated with traction. The average pre-traction curve was 95 degrees and the average pre-traction curve in bending was 73 degrees; the final traction average curve was 44 degrees. The difference between the magnitude of curve correction in bending and traction films was statistically significant. Traction weight was increased to an average of 54% of body weight. The only complication was a bilateral lower extremity sensory deficit that resolved after traction weight reduction. The average final correction was 71%. Spinal release and halo-femoral traction offer a safe approach to the correction of severe spinal deformities before fusion.

Perioperative halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe scoliosis and kyphosis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of patients that underwent perioperative halo-gravity traction as an adjunct to modern instrumentation methods in the treatment of severe scoliosis and kyphosis.

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical and radiographic results of perioperative halo-gravity traction in several time periods.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Few reports to our knowledge review the use of perioperative and intraoperative halo-gravity traction in this patient population.

METHODS

A total of 33 patients with severe operative scoliosis, kyphoscoliosis, or kyphosis were studied based on hospital records, standing pretreatment, traction (before anterior/posterior fusion), postoperative (each stage), and final radiographs. Patients were analyzed by age at date of examination (range, 2-20 years; mean, 13.8 years), gender (18 male, 15 female), major coronal curve magnitude (range, 22 degrees-158 degrees; average, 84 degrees), major compensatory coronal curve magnitude (range, 8 degrees-123 degrees; average, 51 degrees), major sagittal curve magnitude (range, 13 degrees-143 degrees; average, 78 degrees), traction protocol, and procedure type. Halo-traction-related, short- and long-term complications were noted in each case.

RESULTS

The major coronal curve reduced 38 degrees or 46% after posterior spinal fusion compared to pretreatment radiographs. At an average of 44 months radiographic follow-up (range, 24-107 months), the loss of correction averaged 7 degrees for major coronal curves and 4 degrees of thoracic kyphosis. Clinical complications were noted in the perioperative and long-term time periods.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of severe scoliosis can be very challenging despite the benefits of modern instrumentation methods, especially if there is a significant kyphosis or a history of intraspinal pathology. Halo-gravity traction is a safe, well-tolerated method of applying gradual, sustained traction to maximize postoperative correction in this difficult population. There were no permanent neurologic deficits in this series.

Fourth and sixth cranial nerve injury after halo traction in children: a report of two cases

BACKGROUND

Spinal traction is the application of a longitudinal force to the spinal column as a means of stabilizing a damaged or abnormal spine. Although not well documented in the ophthalmic literature, complications include cranial nerve palsies, with the sixth nerve being most commonly affected. Fourth nerve palsies have not previously been reported to our knowledge. We present 2 cases of combined fourth and sixth palsies after cervical traction.

METHODS

Retrospectively, we reviewed the ophthalmic findings in 2 children with diplopia after spinal traction.

RESULTS

Case 1 suffered a traumatic rotatory atlantoaxial subluxation and underwent halo traction. Case 2 required traction to correct a scoliosis secondary to osteogenesis imperfecta. In both cases, sixth nerve palsies were apparent soon after traction. Careful orthoptic examination revealed additional fourth nerve involvement. After 3 months, both cases showed partial resolution of the cranial nerve injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Cranial nerve injury may occur with spinal traction. Fourth nerve palsy may be underreported because of masking by a coinciding sixth nerve palsy.