Evaluation of aminoglycoside disposition in patients previously treated with cisplatin

Drug Class Combination–Associated Acute Kidney Injury

Objective: To evaluate the quality of available evidence of drug class combinations and their association with the development of acute kidney injury (AKI). Data Sources: A search of MEDLINE and Embase databases was completed using the following terms: “risk factor AND (acute kidney injury or acute kidney failure) AND (drug or medication).” Study Selection and Data Extraction: Inclusion criteria were the following: English language, full-text availability, and at least 1 drug-combination. Each citation was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. The literature was evaluated using the quality of evidence component of GRADE. No standardized definition of AKI was applied throughout.. Data Synthesis: Out of 2139 total citations, 151 were assessed for full-text review, with 121 citations (6%) meeting inclusion criteria, producing76 unique drug class combinations. Overall, 56 combinations (73.7%) were considered very low quality; 12 (15.8%) were considered low quality. There were 8 (10.5%) of moderate quality, and no combination was considered high quality. 58 (76%) combinations that had a single citation,with a mean of 1.6 citations per drug class combination. The combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and diuretics was reported in 10 citations, the largest number of citations. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a lack of well-designed studies addressing drug class combination–associated AKI. The combination of NSAIDs and diuretics with or without additional renin-angiotensin aldosterone agents had the strongest level of evidence. Despite limitations, the information included in this review may result in additional scrutiny about combining certain individual nephrotoxic drugs.

A guide to clinically relevant drug interactions in oncology

This paper presents an overview of new information on clinically relevant drug-drug interactions, particular focuses on negative drug interactions in oncology. We have generated a concise table of drug-drug interactions that provides a synopsis of the clinical outcome of the interaction along with a recommendation for management. We have also generated other tables that describe specific interactions with methotrexate and dosing guidelines for cytotoxic drugs in the presence of renal or hepatic dysfunction. Since warfarin is one of the non-anticancer drugs that is commonly used in cancer patients for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism, its interactions with other anticancer drugs that have been reported in literatures were also reviewed in this paper. In general, drug interactions observed in cancer patients may be categorized into pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmaceutic interactions. Pharmacokinetic interactions involve one drug altering the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of another drug. Interpatient variability in the pharmacokinetic profile of many anticancer agents often complicates the predictability of the antitumor response and toxicities. Among four pharmacokinetic characteristics, drug interactions involving hepatic metabolism is probably the most common and important mechanism responsible for oncologic drug interactions. For example, several anticancer drugs including taxanes, vinca alkaloids, and irinotecan are known to be metabolized by cytochrome CYP3A4. Enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants have been shown to significantly decrease the plasma levels of these anticancer drugs, thereby compromising the anti-tumor effects. N ephrotoxicity or changes in hepatic function caused by some anticancer drugs (e.g., cisplatin, asparaginase) may also have an impact on the pharmacokinetics of the interacting agents. Pharmacodynamic interactions may occur when two or more drugs acting at a common receptor-binding site impact on the pharmacologic action of the object drug, without influencing the pharmacokinetics of each interacting agent. In clinical setting, a decrease of antitumor efficacy was observed in breast cell lines when gemcitabine or vinorelbine were used in combination with paclitaxel. On the other hand, a decreased incidence of thrombocytopenia was seen in patients receiving combination of carboplatin and palcitaxel compared to those receiving carboplatin alone. The third type of drug-drug interaction is known as pharmaceutic interaction. When one drug may alter the physical or chemical compatibility of another drug that utlimately leads to a change in appearance of the solution or a decrease of effectiveness of the drug due to drug inactivation or degradation.

Drug interactions in cancer therapy

Drug interactions in oncology are of particular importance owing to the narrow therapeutic index and the inherent toxicity of anticancer agents. Interactions with other medications can cause small changes in the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of a chemotherapy agent that could significantly alter its efficacy or toxicity. Improvements in in vitro methods and early clinical testing have made the prediction of potentially clinically significant drug interactions possible. We outline the types of drug interaction that occur in oncology, the mechanisms that underlie these interactions and describe select examples.

Tobramycin Pharmacokinetics in Children with Febrile Neutropenia Undergoing Stem Cell Transplantation: Once-Daily versus Thrice-Daily Administration

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe the pharmacokinetic disposition of tobramycin in children undergoing stem cell transplantation (SCT) after intravenous administration either every 24 hours or every 8 hours, and to use this information to create initial dosing guidelines for administration every 24 hours in this patient population.

DESIGN

Pharmacokinetic analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

PATIENTS

Sixty children (< 18 yrs) with febrile neutropenia undergoing stem cell transplantation.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to receive intravenous tobramycin either every 24 hours (29 patients) or every 8 hours (31 patients). Initially, they received either 2.5 mg/kg/dose every 8 hours or weight-based doses by age group (< 5 yrs, 9 mg/kg/dose; 5 to < 12 yrs, 8 mg/kg/dose; > or = 12 yrs, 7 mg/kg/dose) every 24 hours.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Serum tobramycin concentrations were obtained at 2 and 8 hours after the first dose. Initial guidelines for dosing every 24 hours were derived using the parameters from all patients to achieve a maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of 20-22.5 mg/L and a drug-free interval (time during dosing interval when the tobramycin concentration was < 1 mg/L) of at least 4 hours. After the first tobramycin dose, the elimination rate constant (kel) and volume of distribution (Vd) observed in the every-8-hour group (23 patients) were 0.34 +/- 0.09 hours(-1) and 0.48 +/- 0.21 L/kg, respectively. The kel and Vd in the every-24-hour group (22 patients) were 0.43 +/- 0.12 hr(-1) and 0.43 +/- 0.26 L/kg, respectively. Tobramycin Vd varied with age. Initial doses of tobramycin every 24 hours recommended to achieve the target parameters are 10 mg/kg/dose for patients aged 6 months to less than 9 years, 8 mg/kg/dose for those aged 9 to less than 12 years, and 6 mg/kg/dose for those aged 12 years or older.

CONCLUSION

Children undergoing SCT who receive tobramycin every 24 hours should receive an initial dose based on age. Further validation of the proposed dosing guidelines is required.

Use of etoposide in patients with organ dysfunction: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations

Etoposide is a podophyllotoxin deriverative with activity against a wide variety of malignancies. It is also used in many clinical conditions in which renal or hepatic function is impaired. To establish a basis for making initial dose adjustments in patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction, the clinical pharmacology (e.g., absorption, distribution, protein binding, metabolism, and elimination) of etoposide is presented. Studies of the use of etoposide in patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction are summarized. The importance of protein binding to etoposide disposition, especially in patients with hepatic dysfunction is discussed. Pharmacodynamics refers to the relationship between drug concentration at the site of action (receptor) and pharmacologic response (toxicity or efficacy). The pharmacodynamics of etoposide has been studied in only a few patients with renal and (or) hepatic dysfunction and must be studied in larger populations before definitive dosing guidelines can be recommended. However, some general initial dosing recommendations for the use of etoposide in patients with renal and hepatic dysfunction are presented.

Renal dysfunction during high-dose cisplatin therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: effect of aminoglycoside therapy

PURPOSE

Renal dysfunction is a common cause of morbidity after cancer therapy and bone marrow transplantation. In this study, we evaluated the effects of aminoglycosides and other nephrotoxic antibiotics on the occurrence of renal dysfunction in patients who received high-dose cisplatin-containing chemotherapy regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The subjects of this analysis were 102 consecutive patients, studied from September 1985 to February 1991, who received high-dose cisplatin, administered as 40 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days in 3% saline with saline hydration and mannitol diuresis, followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. Renal dysfunction was defined as an increase in serum creatinine greater than or equal to 44.2 mumol/L above baseline.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the 43 patients who were given aminoglycosides were similar to those in patients who did not receive aminoglycosides with respect to initial renal function, age, cancer type, and previous exposure to cisplatin. Patients who experienced serious treatment-related toxicities such as hemorrhage or septicemia were more likely to have received aminoglycoside antibiotics (p = 0.005). A multivariate analysis showed that increased duration of neutropenia, advanced patient age, and amphotericin B use were predictors of renal failure. Aminoglycoside therapy did not significantly increase the risk of renal dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that with appropriate supportive care measures, aminoglycosides can safely be administered to febrile, neutropenic patients who recently have received high-dose cisplatin therapy.