Vigabatrin serum concentration to dosage ratio: influence of age and associated antiepileptic drugs

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of 6 New-Generation Antiseizure Medications Using a Mass Spectrometry Method: Analysis of 2-Year Experience in a Large Cohort of Korean Epilepsy Patients

CONTEXT.—

New-generation antiseizure medications (ASMs) are increasingly prescribed, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been proposed to improve clinical outcome. However, clinical TDM data on new-generation ASMs are scarce.

OBJECTIVE.—

To develop and validate a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of 6 new-generation ASMs in serum and analyze the clinical TDM data from a large cohort of Korean patients with epilepsy.

DESIGN.—

Stable isotope-labeled internal standards were added to protein precipitations of serum. One microliter of sample was separated on an Agilent Poroshell EC-C18 column, and lacosamide, perampanel, gabapentin, pregabalin, vigabatrin, and rufinamide were simultaneously quantified by Agilent 6460 triple-quad mass spectrometer in multiple-reaction monitoring mode. Linearity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, specificity, carryover, extraction recovery, and matrix effect were evaluated. TDM data of 458 samples from 363 Korean epilepsy patients were analyzed.

RESULTS.—

The method was linear with limit of detection less than 0.05 μg/mL in all analytes. Intraassay and interassay imprecisions were less than 5% coefficient of variation. Accuracy was within ±15% bias. Extraction recovery ranged from 85.9% to 98.8%. A total of 88% (403 of 458) were on polypharmacy, with 29% (118 of 403) using concomitant enzyme inducers. Only 38% (175 of 458) of the concentrations were therapeutic, with 53% (244 of 458) being subtherapeutic. Drug concentration and concentration-to-dose ratio were highly variable among individuals for all 6 ASMs.

CONCLUSIONS.—

A simple and rapid LC-MS/MS method for TDM of 6 ASMs was developed and successfully applied to clinical practice. These large-scale TDM data could help establish an effective monitoring strategy for these drugs.

Antiepileptic drugs--best practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring: a position paper by the subcommission on therapeutic drug monitoring, ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies

Although no randomized studies have demonstrated a positive impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) on clinical outcome in epilepsy, evidence from nonrandomized studies and everyday clinical experience does indicate that measuring serum concentrations of old and new generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can have a valuable role in guiding patient management provided that concentrations are measured with a clear indication and are interpreted critically, taking into account the whole clinical context. Situations in which AED measurements are most likely to be of benefit include (1) when a person has attained the desired clinical outcome, to establish an individual therapeutic concentration which can be used at subsequent times to assess potential causes for a change in drug response; (2) as an aid in the diagnosis of clinical toxicity; (3) to assess compliance, particularly in patients with uncontrolled seizures or breakthrough seizures; (4) to guide dosage adjustment in situations associated with increased pharmacokinetic variability (e.g., children, the elderly, patients with associated diseases, drug formulation changes); (5) when a potentially important pharmacokinetic change is anticipated (e.g., in pregnancy, or when an interacting drug is added or removed); (6) to guide dose adjustments for AEDs with dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, particularly phenytoin.

Pharmacokinetic Variability of Newer Antiepileptic Drugs

A new generation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has reached the market in recent years with ten new compounds: felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. The newer AEDs in general have more predictable pharmacokinetics than older AEDs such as phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid (valproate sodium), which have a pronounced inter-individual variability in their pharmacokinetics and a narrow therapeutic range. For these older drugs it has been common practice to adjust the dosage to achieve a serum drug concentration within a predefined 'therapeutic range', representing an interval where most patients are expected to show an optimal response. However, such ranges must be interpreted with caution, since many patients are optimally treated when they have serum concentrations below or above the suggested range. It is often said that there is less need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with the newer AEDs, although this is partially based on the lack of documented correlation between serum concentration and drug effects. Nevertheless, TDM may be useful despite the shortcomings of existing therapeutic ranges, by utilisation of the concept of 'individual reference concentrations' based on intra-individual comparisons of drug serum concentrations. With this concept, TDM may be indicated regardless of the existence or lack of a well-defined therapeutic range. The ten newer AEDs all have different pharmacological properties, and therefore, the usefulness of TDM for these drugs has to be assessed individually. For vigabatrin, a clear relationship between drug concentration and clinical effect cannot be expected because of its unique mode of action. Therefore, TDM of vigabatrin is mainly to check compliance. The mode of action of the other new AEDs would not preclude the applicability of TDM. For the prodrug oxcarbazepine, TDM is also useful, since the active metabolite licarbazepine is measured. For drugs that are eliminated renally completely unchanged (gabapentin, pregabalin and vigabatrin) or mainly unchanged (levetiracetam and topiramate), the pharmacokinetic variability is less pronounced and more predictable. However, the dose-dependent absorption of gabapentin increases its pharmacokinetic variability. Drug interactions can affect topiramate concentrations markedly, and individual factors such as age, pregnancy and renal function will contribute to the pharmacokinetic variability of all renally eliminated AEDs. For those of the newer AEDs that are metabolised (felbamate, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine and zonisamide), pharmacokinetic variability is just as relevant as for many of the older AEDs. Therefore, TDM is likely to be useful in many clinical settings for the newer AEDs. The purpose of the present review is to discuss individually the potential value of TDM of these newer AEDs, with emphasis on pharmacokinetic variability.

Topiramate Serum Concentration-to-Dose Ratio

The influence of age and concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the trough steady-state serum concentration of topiramate, normalized to 1 mg/kg body weight or concentration-to-dose ratio (TPM-CDR), was assessed using multivariate methods in samples from 94 epileptic patients (38 under 11 years and 56 over 11 years of age), most of whom were outpatients receiving either just TPM (n = 20) or TPM in combination with other AEDs (n = 74). Analysis of the covariance showed that the age of the patients was influential (P < 0.001) and also showed a difference in TPM-CDR between the non-inducers group (TPM or TPM + lamotrigine or valproate) and the inducers group (TPM + carbamazepine, phenobarbital, or phenytoin) (P < 0.001). The TPM-CDR was 0.4 +/- 0.1 in patients under 11 years with inducers (n = 7), 0.8 +/- 0.3 in patients over 11 years with inducers (n = 32), 1.1 +/- 0.4 in patients under 11 years with noninducers (n = 30), and 1.8 +/- 0.6 in patients over 11 years with noninducers (n = 21). A two-way analysis of the variance showed differences between patients under 11 years and those over 11 years (P < 0.001), and between the noninducers and inducers groups (P < 0.001). TPM-CDR was nearly 50% lower in patients under 11 years than in patients over 11 years, and in patients with TPM + inducers than in patients with TPM or TPM + noninducers, in both children and adults. To achieve the same serum concentration of TPM, children will need double the daily dose per kilogram of TPM required by adults, and both children and adults taking enzyme-inducing AEDs will require double the dose needed by those who do not take them.

Serum concentrations and effects of gabapentin and vigabatrin: observations from a dose titration study

To explore possible concentration-effect relationships, gabapentin (GBP) and vigabatrin (VGB) serum concentrations were obtained from patients participating in an add-on dose-titration trial comparing GBP and VGB in partial epilepsy. Patients randomized to GBP started on 1800 mg/d and could have their dosage increased stepwise to 2400 and 3600 mg/d if seizures persisted. Those randomised to VGB started on 1000 mg/d, and the dose could be increased to 2000 and 4000 mg/d. Blood samples were obtained at steady state, at a nonstandardized time, from 27 patients randomized to GBP and from 36 randomized to VGB. Serum samples were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography. The treatment effect was expressed as percentage reduction in number of seizures from baseline. In addition, patients were classified as responders (>50% reduction in number of seizures from baseline) or nonresponders. There was no significant correlation between serum concentrations of GBP and seizure reduction at the lowest dosage, 1800 mg/d (r = -0.02, P = 0.94, Spearman-rank), nor between VGB serum levels and seizure reduction at 1000 mg/d of VGB (r = -0.14, P = 0.44). The serum GBP concentrations among responders to GBP 1800 mg/d were 26 +/- 12 micro mol/L (mean +/- SD), which was not different from serum concentrations in nonresponders, 28+/-13 micro mol/L. Nor was there a difference between serum concentrations of responders and nonresponders to VGB 1000 mg/d (32 +/- 23 and 44 +/- 36 micro mol/L, respectively). Hence, with the present study design we were unable to identify specific target ranges of GBP and VGB serum concentrations.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of the newer antiepileptic drugs

The aim of the present review is to discuss the potential value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide. Studies of the relationship between serum concentrations and clinical efficacy of these drugs are reviewed, and the potential value of TDM of the drugs is discussed based on their pharmacokinetic properties and mode of action. Analytical methods for the determination of the serum concentrations of these drugs are also briefly described. There are only some prospective data on the serum concentration-effect relationships, and few studies have been designed primarily to study these relationships. As TDM is not widely practiced for the newer AEDs, there are no generally accepted target ranges for any of these drugs, and for most a wide range in serum concentration is associated with clinical efficacy. Furthermore, a considerable overlap in drug concentrations related to toxicity and nonresponse is reported. Nevertheless, the current tentative target ranges for felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine (10-hydroxy-carbazepine metabolite), tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide are 125 to 250 micromol/L, 70 to 120 micromol/L, 10 to 60 micromol/L, 35 to 120 micromol/L, 50 to 140 micomol/L, 50 to 250 nmol/L, 15 to 60 micromol/L, 6 to 278 micromol/L, and 45 to 180 micromol/L, respectively. Further systematic studies designed specifically to evaluate concentration-effect relationships of the new AEDs are urgently needed. Although routine monitoring in general cannot be recommended at present, measurements of some of the drugs is undoubtedly of help with individualization of treatment in selected cases in a particular clinical setting.

Factors influencing cyclosporine blood concentration-dose ratio

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the trough cyclosporine concentration-dose ratio (CDR) and its relationship to some commonly available factors such as cyclosporine dosage, patient age, grade of obesity, posttransplant days, serum creatinine, serum bilirubin, and serum cholesterol by multiple linear regression.

METHODS

The study was performed on 866 samples from 90 transplant recipients (25 kidney, 25 heart, 17 bone marrow, 13 liver, 10 simultaneous pancreas-kidney).

RESULTS

The results show differences between transplants both in cyclosporine CDR variability (expressed by the coefficients of variation) and in the capability of those factors to explain this variability (expressed by the coefficient of determination). Coefficients of variation were 41% for the 866 samples (from 34% in heart to 55% in pancreas-kidney transplantation) and 28% for the 90 patients' CDR mean values (from 24% in heart to 32% in pancreas-kidney transplantation). All factors, except for the grade of obesity, were related to the cyclosporine CDR for all transplants as a whole. However, differences in the influence of each factor on each transplant were observed. The coefficient of determination based on significant factors was R2 = 0.25 for all samples (from 0.18 in pancreas-kidney to 0.52 in liver transplantation) and R2 = 0.53 for the patients' CDR means (from 0.39 in heart to 0.83 in kidney transplantation).

CONCLUSIONS

We have quantified the cyclosporine CDR, its variability, and its relationship with some commonly available factors and found significant differences between transplant types. The equations of regression obtained might improve trough cyclosporine CDR estimation as a first step in cyclosporine dosage adjustment in kidney and liver transplant recipients.

Prolonged vigabatrin treatment modifies developmental changes of GABA(A)-receptor binding in young children with epilepsy

PURPOSE

To determine whether prolonged treatment with vigabatrin (VGB), an antiepileptic drug (AED) that acts by elevating brain gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels, interferes with age-related changes of in vivo GABA(A)-receptor binding in children with epilepsy.

METHODS

Using [11C]flumazenil (FMZ)-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, 15 children (aged 1-8 years) with medically intractable epilepsy were studied. Seven of these children were treated with VGB (1,000-2,500 mg/day) for > or =3 months before the FMZ-PET study. The remaining eight patients were medicated with other drugs that are known not to act directly on the GABAergic system. Absolute quantification of PET data was performed by using the volume of distribution (VD) of FMZ in brain tissue representing FMZ ligand binding.

RESULTS

After controlling for age, hemispheric FMZ VD values were significantly lower in children treated with VGB as compared with the non-VGB group (p = 0.012). Regional FMZ VD values of the VGB-treated patients were significantly lower in all cortical regions and the cerebellum, whereas the difference was not significant in the thalamus and basal ganglia. No significant drug effect or drug-by-region interaction could be determined when the patients were separated according to treatment with carbamazepine (p = 0.97) or valproate (p = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

VGB induces a decrease in GABA(A)-receptor binding in the cortex and cerebellum of the developing epileptic brain. A similar effect of other drugs and substances of abuse targeting the GABAergic system may be hypothesized. Because of the important role of the GABAergic system in developmental plasticity, the reversibility and functional consequences of this age-specific drug effect should be further studied.

Visual field loss associated with vigabatrin: quantification and relation to dosage

PURPOSE

To describe the correlation between visual field loss and the duration, dosage, and total amount of vigabatrin (VGB) medication in a group of patients with epilepsy. Co-medication of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and compliance were also studied.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients (53 male and 39 female) taking VGB medication in the past or the present, attending the Outpatient Epilepsy Clinic in Utrecht, were examined with the Goldmann perimeter. The amount of visual field loss was calculated by the Esterman grid method and by a new method, with which the percentage surface loss of the visual field is measured. A complete drug history was compiled, specifying the amount and duration of VGB medication. Concomitant AED medication was noted. Serum levels of AEDs were determined.

RESULTS

Linear regression showed the total amount of VGB as the most significant parameter to predict visual field loss (p < 0.001). Further, men were more affected than women (p = 0.026). Compliance was good, and other AEDs did not influence the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Because prolonged use of VGB medication is correlated with the amount of visual field loss, VGB should be prescribed only when there are no alternatives. In such cases, we recommend an examination of the peripheral visual field before starting therapy and a repeated examination every 6 months.