Analysis of whole blood tacrolimus concentrations in liver transplant patients exhibiting impaired liver function

Initial liver graft function is a reliable predictor of tacrolimus trough levels during the first post-transplant week

The narrow therapeutic range of tacrolimus requires careful management after liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of graft function on tacrolimus trough levels during the first post-transplant week. Ninety-three patients receiving deceased-donor LT were observed in a prospective observational study. Graft function was determined by the new LiMAx test (maximal liver function capacity). Significant correlations between LiMAx readouts and consecutive tacrolimus levels, up to r = -0.529 (p < 0.0001), were determined throughout the observed period of time. Patients with initially poor graft function revealed higher trough levels (n = 24; 20.1 ± 11.6ng/mL) in comparison with fair (n = 40; 13.7 ± 7.8 ng/mL) and good function (n = 29; 9.5 ± 4.4ng/mL; p < 0.0001) already at the second post-transplant day. Toxic levels could be predicted with an area under receiver operating characteristic analysis AUROC=0.751 (p = 0.001) with high sensitivity and specificity. Insufficient levels could be predicted with AUROC=0.800 (p = 0.003). In conclusion, initial graft function is a major factor influencing the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and can be validly determined by the LiMAx test. Thus, recipients with poor functioning grafts are prone of developing toxic levels within the first week after LT, whereas patients with good functioning grafts frequently develop insufficient levels with the current immunosuppressive protocols.

Use of sample hematocrit value to correct blood tacrolimus concentration derived by microparticle enzyme immunoassay

The quality of microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) for blood tacrolimus is guaranteed in samples with hematocrit (Ht) values of 25 to 45%. Because MEIA provides inaccurate blood tacrolimus concentrations in samples with Ht out of this range (i.e. <25% or >45%), correction of the calibration is required for therapeutic drug monitoring. The authors demonstrated previously that overestimated MEIA tacrolimus concentration could be corrected by modified, calibrated MEIA (cMEIA) using the original calibrator. Here, an equation was established to more easily derive a corrected tacrolimus concentration by calculation (MEIAcalc) using the Ht of each sample. The tacrolimus concentrations of 99 whole-blood samples with low Ht (<25%) were then tested by the 3 assay methods: MEIA, cMEIA, and MEIAcalc. MEIA gave a significantly higher blood concentration of tacrolimus (median 12.9 ng/ml, range 3.6-26.4 ng/ml) than did cMEIA (median 10.0 ng/ml, range 0.2-21.1 ng/ml, p<0.05). This overestimation was eliminated by using MEIAcalc. There was no difference in blood tacrolimus concentration between cMEIA and MEIAcalc (median 10.0 ng/ml, range 1.7-21.4 ng/ml). MEIAcalc can be used to correct the tacrolimus concentration in samples obtained from patients with unstable Ht values.

Predicting immunosuppressant dosing in the early postoperative period with noninvasive indocyanine green elimination following orthotopic liver transplantation

Twenty adult patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) were enrolled in this study, with the noninvasive indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (ICG-PDR) measured both during and after OLT to assess the relationship between ICG-PDR and the ability of patients to achieve therapeutic postoperative tacrolimus immunosuppressant blood levels. Liver function was determined at both 2 and 18 hours post reperfusion with the ICG-PDR k value (1/min). Postoperative standard serum measures of liver function as well as liver biopsies were also collected and analyzed. The median ICG-PDR k value for the study group at 2 hours post reperfusion was 0.20 (0.16, 0.27), whereas at 18 hours post reperfusion, it was 0.22 (0.18, 0.35). The median change in the k value between the two ICG-PDR measurements was 0.05 (-0.02, 0.07) with P = 0.02. There was an interaction between the postoperative day 1 (18 hours post reperfusion) ICG-PDR k value and the linear increase in the tacrolimus blood level, such that the greater the k value was, the more gradual the observed rise was in tacrolimus over time [that is, the longer it took to achieve a therapeutic blood level (>12 ng/mL), P = 0.003]. Of the 16 patients that received tacrolimus, comparable dosing on a per kilogram body weight basis was observed. Also, no significant association between ICG-PDR k values and postoperative liver biopsy results was seen. This study demonstrates that the ICG-PDR measurement is a modality with the potential to assist in achieving adequate blood levels of tacrolimus following OLT.

Comparison of an ELISA and an LC/MS/MS method for measuring tacrolimus concentrations and making dosage decisions in transplant recipients

This study compared an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) technique for measurement of tacrolimus concentrations in adult kidney and liver transplant recipients, and investigated how assay choice influenced pharmacokinetic parameter estimates and drug dosage decisions. Tacrolimus concentrations measured by both ELISA and LC/MS/MS from 29 kidney (n = 98 samples) and 27 liver (n = 97 samples) transplant recipients were used to evaluate the performance of these methods in the clinical setting. Tacrolimus concentrations measured by the two techniques were compared via regression analysis. Population pharmacokinetic models were developed independently using ELISA and LC/MS/MS data from 76 kidney recipients. Derived kinetic parameters were used to formulate "typical dosing" regimens for concentration targeting. Dosage recommendations for the two assays were compared. The relation between LC/MS/MS and ELISA measurements was best described by the regression equation ELISA = 1.02. (LC/MS/MS) + 0.14 in kidney recipients, and ELISA = 1.12. (LC/MS/MS) - 0.87 in liver recipients. ELISA displayed less accuracy than LC/MS/MS at lower tacrolimus concentrations. Population pharmacokinetic models based on ELISA and LC/MS/MS data were similar with residual random errors of 4.1 ng/mL and 3.7 ng/mL, respectively. Assay choice gave rise to dosage prediction differences ranging from 0% to 30%. ELISA measurements of tacrolimus are not automatically interchangeable with LC/MS/MS values. Assay differences were greatest in adult liver recipients, probably reflecting periods of liver dysfunction and impaired biliary secretion of metabolites. While the majority of data collected in this study suggested assay differences in adult kidney recipients were minimal, findings of ELISA dosage underpredictions of up to 25% in the long term must be investigated further.

Therapeutic drug monitoring for immunosuppressants

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressants have significantly increased patient survival, e.g. in renal transplant up to 90% for the first year.

METHODS

Four immunosuppressants are used for clinical applications in the United States: cyclosporine (CsA) (Sandimmune and Neoral), FK 506-tacrolimus (ProGraf), mycophenolic mofetil (CellCept)--the prodrug for the mycophenolic acid (MPA), and rapamycin (RAPA) (Sirolimus). For CsA and FK 506, the rationale for monitoring is due to the variable pharmacokinetics, acute infection, dosage adjustment, non-compliance check, and for long-term maintenance therapy. Targeted whole blood concentrations ranges are: for CsA, 100-400 ng/ml depending on the methods, therapy and organs; and for FK 506, 5-20 ng/ml. For MPA, drug bioavailability--the plasma area-under-curve up to 12 h of 32.2-60.6 mg h/l was correlated to the biopsy-proven rejection rate of <10%. Monitoring is advocated for liver and renal transplants, for pediatrics, and for checking for non-compliance. RAPA monitoring is useful to check for variable pharmacokinetics, for non-compliance and others. The therapeutic range is tentatively targeted for 5-15 ng/ml. Monitoring methodologies are: for CsA, immunoassays such as fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and liquid chromatography (LC); for FK 506, microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA); for MPA, enzyme multiplied immunoassay and LC; and for RAPA, MEIA, LC and LC-mass spectrometry. Proficiency survey programs for CsA and FK 506 are available from the US and Europe.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring of immunosuppressants has become an essential adjunct to the drug therapy for organ transplant patients.

Clinical utility of monitoring tacrolimus blood concentrations in liver transplant patients

The relationship between the dose of tacrolimus, trough tacrolimus blood concentration, and selected clinical endpoints (acute rejection, nephrotoxicity, and other toxicities) were examined in a prospective, multicenter clinical trial to validate the use of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for monitoring whole-blood concentrations of tacrolimus in liver transplant patients. A total of 111 subjects from six transplant centers were evaluated over 12 weeks posttransplantation. In addition to trough tacrolimus blood concentrations, hematocrit, ALT, AST, GGTP, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, serum creatinine, BUN, serum potassium, serum magnesium, blood glucose, and serum albumin were also measured. The relationship between trough tacrolimus blood concentrations and clinical endpoints was analyzed using both a logistic regression model and a Cox proportional hazard model. By logistic regression analysis, a statistically significant (p = 0.0465) relationship between increasing trough tacrolimus blood concentrations and decreasing risk of acute rejection was demonstrated over a 7-day time window. Nephrotoxicity and other toxicities also demonstrated statistically significant relationships with trough tacrolimus blood concentrations. The results of the Cox analysis were consistent with the logistic regression analysis. Using receiver operator characteristic curves, trough tacrolimus concentrations as measured by the ELISA method were able to differentiate the occurrence of nephrotoxicity and toxicity from nonevents. To minimize nephrotoxicity of tacrolimus, it is necessary to maintain trough blood concentrations below 15 ng/ml. This study demonstrates that the ELISA method used to measure tacrolimus blood concentrations in this study provides information of predictive value for managing the risk of nephrotoxicity, other toxicity, and rejection in liver transplant patients.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplant patients

The clinical utility of tacrolimus monitoring in adults has been well documented. The present study compared tacrolimus monitoring in a pediatric population of 34 liver transplant patients in four US centers with an adult population of 111 patients in six US centers. Subjects (adult and pediatric) were evaluated, at defined intervals over 12 weeks post-transplantation (Tx), for tacrolimus trough concentrations and 12 additional laboratory chemistries. Pediatric patient and graft survival for the 12 weeks were 91% and 88%, respectively, as compared to 97% and 93%, respectively, for the adult population. The mean oral dosage of tacrolimus for pediatric patients was 0.13 +/- 0.1 mg/kg/day at week 1, increased to 0.30 +/- 0.3 mg/kg/day by week 3 and remained constant for the remainder of the study. These dosages were two- to three-fold higher than the dosage used in the adult population. In contrast, the mean whole-blood trough concentration, as determined by PRO-Tractrade mark II enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), decreased from 11.3 +/- 5.1 ng/mL at week 1 to 6.3 +/- 3.7 ng/mL by week 12 and was not significantly different from the trough concentration in adults. The incidence and distribution of the clinical end-points for the pediatric subjects (rejection, nephrotoxicity, death, re-Tx) were different from those observed in adults. The total percentage of pediatric subjects reaching any end-point was 74%, as compared to 54% in the adult population. These data indicate several differences between the adult and pediatric populations in their response to tacrolimus.

New developments in the immunosuppressive drug monitoring of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and azathioprine

The calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus form the cornerstones of most immunosuppression protocols. Because of their variable pharmacokinetics, and their narrow therapeutic indices, post-transplant immunosuppressive drug monitoring is an essential part of patient care to minimize the risks of toxicity or acute rejection. Furthermore, a reduction in the rate of acute rejection has been shown to result in a lower rate of graft loss due to chronic rejection. The introduction of the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine with its more consistent bioavailability has renewed interest in the use of alternative sampling strategies to the trough cyclosporine concentration. Both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations support the concept that determination of cyclosporine during the absorption phase (0-4 h) might offer a better prediction of cyclosporine immunosuppressive efficacy. Initial investigations suggest that monitoring a 2-h postdose concentration C(2) may provide a more efficacious alternative to trough monitoring for optimizing therapy with Neoral. Tacrolimus has a 10- to 100-fold greater in vitro immunosuppressive activity compared with cyclosporine. Consistent with its greater potency, therapeutic whole blood trough concentrations for tacrolimus are around 20-fold lower than the corresponding cyclosporine concentrations. The correlation between toxicity and tacrolimus trough concentrations appears to be stronger than that for acute rejection. The results from a concentration-ranging trial in primary kidney-transplantation and liver-transplantation trials all found a significant relationship between toxicity and tacrolimus trough levels. Azathioprine is converted in vivo to 6-mercaptopurine, which is subsequently metabolized to the pharmacologically active 6-thioguanine nucleotides. The latter are also responsible for the cytotoxic side effects. Reliance on blood counts to monitor azathioprine therapy can be misleading, and they do not provide information on immunosuppresive efficacy. More pertinent information can be obtained through the measurement of thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity and the quantification of intracellular 6-thioguanine nucleotides concentrations in red blood cells. Prospective studies have demonstrated the clinical utility of determining 6-thioguanine nucleotides to individualise immunosuppressive therapy with azathioprine not only in the field of transplantation, but also in inflammatory bowel disease.