Histologic determinants of monoethylglycinexylidide formation in patients with chronic hepatitis C

Noninvasive diagnosis of fibrosis in chronic liver disease

Laboratory tests for the noninvasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis were studied extensively in the past. However, no test is yet accepted to replace liver biopsy as the gold standard. The establishment of widely accepted semiquantitative histologic scoring systems for the grading and staging of chronic liver disease (e.g., Ishak, Metavir and Scheuer) was paralleled by a significant upturn of research in circulating markers of liver fibrosis. We are now experiencing the renaissance of standard clinical chemistry markers, which are assembled to multiparameter scores (e.g., aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index, FibroTest, Forns' index). These scores still require comprehensive evaluation in comparison with histology. Better understanding of the pathophysiology of liver fibrosis provided new options regarding circulating markers of hepatic matrix metabolism (e.g., hyaluronic acid, laminin, matrix metalloproteinase-2, aminoterminal propeptide of procollagen type III and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases-1). Several promising studies have been published to date. Thus, a redefinition of the role of liver biopsy is expected in the foreseeable future.

Long-term follow up of chronic hepatitis C patients after alpha-interferon treatment: a functional study

AIM

To evaluate the long-term functional outcome of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients treated with interferon (IFN) therapy.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with CHC were followed up for a mean of 36 months (+/- 19, SD) after a course of IFN therapy. Biochemical, virological (qualitative hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA and HCV genotype), and functional (monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) test) evaluations were carried out at the time of liver biopsy. Patients were divided into long-term responders (LTR), relapsers (RR), or non-responders (NR) according to IFN therapy outcome. At the end of follow up, patients were non-invasively re-evaluated by means of biochemistry, qualitative HCV-RNA, MEGX test, and liver ultrasonography.

RESULTS

A significant decrease in MEGX values was observed in all patients. However, when patients were examined according to treatment outcome, only NR and RR showed a significant decrease in liver function as compared to pretreatment levels (MEGX30, 80.5 +/- 26.8-62.9 +/- 24.2 ng/mL, P< 0.01; MEGX60, 72.9 +/- 18.1-60.5 +/- 19.7 ng/mL, P< 0.05; MEGXAUC, 3,816 +/- 1,243-3,095 +/- 1,205 ng/mL per h, P< 0.05). On the contrary, LTR patients showed no significant modifications in MEGX values at each sampling time (MEGX,5, 72.9 +/- 31.4-70.3 +/- 29.7 ng/mL; MEGX30, 84.0 +/- 27.6-71.5 +/- 21.8 ng/ mL; MEGX60, 69.5 +/- 26.8-63.2 +/- 14.4 ng/mL; MEGXAUC 4028 +/- 1,378-3,620 +/- 1,041 ng/mL per h). At the end of follow up, LTR patients showed normal liver biochemistry and negativity of serum HCV-RNA, while NR and RR patients showed a significant decrease in platelets.

CONCLUSIONS

In CHC patients long-term response to IFN therapy, besides favoring positive clinical and virologic long-term outcome, results in maintaining preserved liver function. Furthermore, IFN therapy seems to determine a decrease in the rate of functional disease progression, even in NR and RR. The MEGX test may be considered as a useful tool for performing serial follow up of CHC patients.