Relationship between plasma concentrations of 5-fluorouracil and 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil infusions in cancer patients

Systemic exposure to 5-fluorouracil and its metabolite, 5,6-dihydrofluorouracil, and development of a limited sampling strategy for therapeutic drug management of 5-fluorouracil in patients with gastrointestinal malignancy

AIMS

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is widely used in combination chemotherapy, and literature suggests pharmacokinetic-guided dosing to improve clinical efficacy and reduce toxicity. This study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic exposure of both 5-FU and its metabolite, 5,6-dihydrofluorouracil (DHFU), in patients with gastrointestinal malignancy and to establish a simplified strategy to assist in therapeutic drug management for dose optimization.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study, performed in 27 patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal malignancy who were prescribed 5-FU. Multiple samples were collected per patient over the slow bolus (15-20 min) and continuous infusion period (over 44 h) in doses 1 and 3, and the concentrations of 5-FU and DHFU were measured.

RESULTS

A higher proportion of patients had exposures within the therapeutic range in dose 3 (50%) as compared to dose 1 (37.5%) with 5-FU. There was an association between delayed time to maximum concentration of DHFU and a high maximum concentration of 5-FU. A limited sampling strategy was developed with 4 samples, 2 during the bolus period and 2 during the continuous period (at 18 h and the end of infusion), which accurately predicted the total area under the curve of 5-FU.

CONCLUSION

Using body surface area-based dosing with 5-FU, 50-60% of patients were outside of the therapeutic range. In the absence of genotype testing, measurement of the metabolite DHFU could be a phenotypical measure of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme activity. A limited sampling strategy was developed in patients who were prescribed a combination regimen of slow bolus, followed by a 44-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU to assist in the therapeutic drug management of patients.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Oncology: International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology Recommendations for 5-Fluorouracil Therapy

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is dosed by body surface area, a practice unable to reduce the interindividual variability in exposure. Endorsed by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT), we evaluated clinical evidence and strongly recommend TDM for the management of 5-FU therapy in patients with colorectal or head-and-neck cancer receiving common 5-FU regimens. Our systematic methodology provides a framework to evaluate published evidence in support of TDM recommendations in oncology.

The Herb-Drug Pharmacokinetic Interaction of 5-Fluorouracil and Its Metabolite 5-Fluoro-5,6-Dihydrouracil with a Traditional Chinese Medicine in Rats

Background: Xiang-Sha-Liu-Jun-Zi-Tang (XSLJZT) is the most common traditional formula given to colorectal and breast cancer patients in Taiwan, according to a statistical study of the National Health Insurance Research Database. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is widely used as the first line of treatment for colorectal cancer. Thus, the aim of study is to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction of XSLJZT and 5-FU. Methods: To investigate the herb–drug interaction of XSLJZT with 5-FU as well as its metabolite 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FDHU) using pharmacokinetics, a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system coupled with a photodiode array detector was developed to monitor 5-FU and 5-FDHU levels in rat blood. Rats were divided into three cohorts, one of which was administered 5-FU (100 mg/kg, iv—intravenous) alone, while the other two groups were pretreated with low and high doses of XSLJZT (600 mg/kg/day or 2400 mg/kg/day for 5 consecutive days) in combination with 5-FU. Results: The results demonstrated that 5-FU level was not significantly different between the group treated with only 5-FU and the group pretreated with a normal dose of XSLJZT (600 mg/kg/day). However, pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that pretreatment with a high dose of XSLJZT (2400 mg/kg/day) extended the residence time and increased the volume of distribution of 5-FU. No significant distinctions were found in 5-FDHU pharmacokinetic parameters at three doses of XSLJZT. Conclusions: Overall, the pharmacokinetic results confirm the safety of coadministering 5-FU with XSLJZT, and provide practical dosage information for clinical practice.

Determination of 5-fluorouracil and dihydrofluorouracil levels by using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for evaluation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme activity

PURPOSE

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), acting as a pyrimidine antagonist, is a major chemotherapy drug used for the treatment of tumors such as gastrointestinal, breast, ovary, and head and neck cancers. The key and rate-limiting enzyme in 5-FU catabolism is dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DHPDH), whose partial or complete deficiency exposes to a severe 5-FU toxicity in patients. The determination of DHPDH activity in patients before the treatment and setting up a personalized therapy for each patient receiving the drug can help us to prevent the possible risk of toxicity.

METHODS

To isolate peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), EDTA-anticoagulated blood samples were collected from randomly selected 47 patients and examined for 5-FU and its metabolite dihydrofluorouracil (FUH2) by using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to observe DHPDH activity at different intervals (0 and 4th hour) indirectly.

RESULTS

Intra-assay and interassay CV % values of samples from the measurements of the modified methods are found 1.3-11.9, 2.3-9.4 for 5-FU and 3.1-14.4, 3.3-12.6 for FUH2, respectively. The reference values derived from 45 patients treated with 5-FU are 1.84 ± 0.34 ug/gr protein for 5-FU, 40.15 ± 11.43 ng/gr protein for FUH2, respectively. FUH2/5-FU ratio is 21.9 ± 3.72. In addition, the results determined from two patients, in which the lack of DHPDH is considered, were 3.24 and 4.16 ug/gr protein for 5-FU, 4.1 and 6.7 ng/gr protein for FUH2. FUH2/5-FU ratio is 1.26 and 1.61.

CONCLUSION

The measurements of 5-FU, FUH2, and especially their ratio (FUH2/5-FU) by the modified LC-MS/MS method could be used to determine DHPDH enzyme activity.

The Value of Dihydrouracil/Uracil Plasma Ratios in Predicting 5-Fluorouracil-Related Toxicity in Colorectal Cancer Patients

This study investigated the relationship between the dihydrouracil/uracil (UH2/U) plasma ratio, a surrogate marker of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-related early toxicity. Plasma UH2/U ratios were determined in 68 colorectal cancer patients and 100 healthy controls. A cutoff value indicative of DPD deficiency was calculated using receiver operator characteristics. Patients experiencing toxicity were screened for the DPD G-to-A point mutation within the 5′-splicing donor site of intron 14 (IVS14+1G>A). Overall, 24/68 patients (35%) experienced toxicity (all grades) and abnormal UH2/U ratios were demonstrated in 21/24 (87.5%) patients. Drug concentrations up to 130 times the recommended level were found in 13/24 (54%) patients experiencing toxicity. One patient experiencing toxicity was a heterozygous carrier of the IVS14+1G>A mutation. A low UH2/U plasma ratio had a sensitivity of 0.87 and specificity of 0.93 for predicting 5-FU-induced toxicity. Systematic detection of DPD-deficient patients using the UH2/U ratio could optimize 5-FU-based chemotherapy and minimize life-threatening toxicity.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase polymorphisms and fluoropyrimidine toxicity: ready for routine clinical application within personalized medicine?

Fluoropyrimidines, including 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), are widely used in the treatment of solid tumors and remain the backbone of many combination regimens. Despite their clinical benefit, fluoropyrimidines are associated with gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities, which often lead to treatment discontinuation. 5-FU undergoes complex metabolism, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) being the rate-limiting enzyme of inactivation of 5-FU and its prodrugs. Several studies have demonstrated significant associations between severe toxicities by fluoropyrimidines and germline polymorphisms of DPD gene. To date, more than 30 SNPs and deletions have been identified within DPD, the majority of these variants having no functional consequences on enzymatic activity. However, the identification of deficient DPD genotypes may help identify poor-metabolizer patients at risk of developing potentially life-threatening toxicities after standard doses of fluoropyrimidines.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics in esophageal cancer chemoradiotherapy

Esophageal cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies. Surgical resection of the tumor from the primary site has been the standard treatment, especially for localized squamous cell carcinoma, but considerable clinical efforts during the last decade have resulted in novel courses of treatment. These options include chemoradiotherapy, consisting of a continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin (CDDP), and concurrent radiation. Given the substantial inter- and/or intra-individual variation in clinical outcome, future improvements will likely require the incorporation of a novel anticancer drug, pharmacokinetically guided administration of CDDP or 5-FU, and identification of potential responders by patient genetic profiling prior to treatment. In this review, the latest information on incidence, risk factors, biomarkers, therapeutic strategies, and the pharmacokinetically guided or genotype-guided administration of CDDP and 5-FU is summarized for future individualization of esophageal cancer treatment.

Predictors of survival and toxicity in patients on adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil for colorectal cancer

The present study aimed at investigating whether the simultaneous evaluation of pharmacokinetic, pharmacogenetic and demographic factors could improve prediction on toxicity and survival in colorectal cancer patients treated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin therapy. One hundred and thirty consecutive, B2 and C Duke's stage colorectal cancer patients were prospectively enrolled. 5FU pharmacokinetics was evaluated at the first cycle. Thymidylate synthase (TYMS) 5′UTR and 3′UTR polymorphisms and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T and A1298C polymorphisms were assessed in peripheral leukocytes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to evaluate which variables could predict chemotherapy-induced toxicity, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis showed that: (a) low 5FU clearance was an independent predictive factor for severe toxicity (OR=7.32; P<0.0001); (b) high-5FU clearance predicted poorer DFS (HR=1.96; P=0.041) and OS (HR=3.37; P=0.011); (c) advanced age was associated with shorter DFS (HR=3.34; P=0.0008) and OS (HR=2.66; P=0.024); (d) the C/C genotype of the MTHFR C677T polymorphism was protective against grade 3–4 toxicity (P=0.040); (e) none of the TYMS polymorphisms could explain 5FU toxicity or clinical outcome.

A rapid and inexpensive method for anticipating severe toxicity to fluorouracil and fluorouracil-based chemotherapy

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency leads to dramatic overexposure to fluorouracil (5-FU), resulting in a potentially lethal outcome in patients treated with standard doses. The aim of this study was to validate, in a routine clinical setting, a simple and rapid method to determine the DPD status in a subset of cancer patients, all presenting with life-threatening toxicities following 5-FU or capecitabine intake. In this study, 80 out of 615 patients (13%) suffered severe toxicities, including 5 lethal ones (0.8%), during or after chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine drug. Patients with severe toxicities were treated with 5-FU (76 patients) or capecitabine-containing protocols (4 patients). Simplified uracil to di-hydrouracil (U/UH2) ratio determination in plasma was retrospectively performed in these 80 patients, as a surrogate marker of DPD activity. When possible, 5-FU Css determination was performed, and screenings for the canonical IVS14+1G>A mutation were systematically carried out. Comparison of the U/UH2 ratios with a reference, non-toxic population, showed abnormal values suggesting impaired DPD activity in 57 out of the 80 toxic patients (71%) included in this study, and in 4 out of 5 patients (80%) with a fatal outcome. Similarly, drug exposures up to 15 times higher than the range observed in the non-toxic population were also observed. Importantly, no IVS14+1G>A mutation was found in these patients, including those displaying the most severe or lethal toxicities. These data warrant systematic detection of DPD-deficient patients prior to fluoropyrimidine administration, including when oral capecitabine (Xeloda) is scheduled. Finally, the simplified methodology presented here proved to be a low cost and rapid way to identify routinely patients at risk of toxicity with 5-FU or capecitabine.

Pharmacogenetics, drug-metabolizing enzymes, and clinical practice

The application of pharmacogenetics holds great promise for individualized therapy. However, it has little clinical reality at present, despite many claims. The main problem is that the evidence base supporting genetic testing before therapy is weak. The pharmacology of the drugs subject to inherited variability in metabolism is often complex. Few have simple or single pathways of elimination. Some have active metabolites or enantiomers with different activities and pathways of elimination. Drug dosing is likely to be influenced only if the aggregate molar activity of all active moieties at the site of action is predictably affected by genotype or phenotype. Variation in drug concentration must be significant enough to provide "signal" over and above normal variation, and there must be a genuine concentration-effect relationship. The therapeutic index of the drug will also influence test utility. After considering all of these factors, the benefits of prospective testing need to be weighed against the costs and against other endpoints of effect. It is not surprising that few drugs satisfy these requirements. Drugs (and enzymes) for which there is a reasonable evidence base supporting genotyping or phenotyping include suxamethonium/mivacurium (butyrylcholinesterase), and azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (thiopurine methyltransferase). Drugs for which there is a potential case for prospective testing include warfarin (CYP2C9), perhexiline (CYP2D6), and perhaps the proton pump inhibitors (CYP2C19). No other drugs have an evidence base that is sufficient to justify prospective testing at present, although some warrant further evaluation. In this review we summarize the current evidence base for pharmacogenetics in relation to drug-metabolizing enzymes.

How may anticancer chemotherapy with fluorouracil be individualised?

Fluorouracil is used clinically against various solid tumours. Both fluorouracil toxicity and pharmacokinetics vary highly within and between individuals. The reasons why doses are not individualised routinely are difficulties in defining, predicting and achieving an optimal fluorouracil exposure or dose because of a narrow therapeutic index, nonlinear pharmacokinetics, variabilities in administration rates and metabolism, and in targets like thymidylate synthase. To individualise fluorouracil administration before the first dose, assessment of the individual dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity may be useful, because this genetically highly polymorphic enzyme controls approximately 80% of fluorouracil elimination. A complete or partial loss of DPD activity in 0.1 and 3-5% of Caucasians, respectively, leads to increased fluorouracil exposure and toxicity. Several methods to assess DPD activity in patients have been proposed (genotyping, various phenotyping methods), but each of them has limitations, as has the fluorouracil test dose approach. To adapt exposure towards fluorouracil a priori, a combination of genotyping and phenotyping may yield better prediction of toxicity than one method alone. A prerequisite for dose adaptation is the definition of fluorouracil exposure ranges with sufficient therapeutic activity, but without serious toxicity. While an increased risk of leukopenia, diarrhoea, stomatitis, and hand-foot syndrome during continuous 5-day infusions was related to fluorouracil exposures above an area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) threshold of 25-30 mg.h/L, tumour response was higher when an AUC of approximately 30 mg.h/L was achieved, illustrating the extremely narrow therapeutic window of fluorouracil. Pharmacokinetic target values are less clear for other regimens, including chronomodulated regimens, which yielded a superior clinically efficacy and tolerability in several trials. However, the monitoring of fluorouracil plasma concentrations seems principally useful for individual a posteriori dose adjustment. Whether an adaptation of the fluorouracil starting dose to the results of two DPD activity tests before fluorouracil administration a priori, and the adaptation of doses to fluorouracil exposure a posteriori is a reasonable approach to better prevent toxicity and increase efficacy, remains to be evaluated in randomised clinical studies comparing these strategies to routine clinical safety monitoring.

Pharmacokinetic and demographic markers of 5-fluorouracil toxicity in 181 patients on adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The relationship between 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) pharmacokinetics and toxicity following i.v. bolus administration has not been extensively studied.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and eighty-one patients on adjuvant therapy with 5-FU plus leucovorin for colorectal cancer were the study population. 5-FU pharmacokinetics was determined on day 2 of the first, third, and fifth cycles; type and the grade of adverse reactions were recorded on the next cycle.

RESULTS

The 5-FU area under the curve (AUC) measured at the first cycle ranged between 146 and 1236 mg x min/l and was significantly correlated with drug dose, patients' body weight (BW) and gender, females having higher AUCs. These covariates explained only 23% of AUC variability. AUC and age were the only covariates which discriminated between toxic (grade > or =2) and nontoxic cycles (grade <2), with an optimal AUC cut-off value of 596 mg x min/l. Such a correlation was lost during the next cycles following dose reduction because of toxicity in 80 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A method for calculating the initial 5-FU dose is proposed which takes into account patient BW, gender and a target AUC of 596 mg x min/l. Nevertheless, it appears that a substantial part of 5-FU toxicity is not linked to pharmacokinetic factors and dose adjustments must still be on the basis of careful clinical surveillance.

Feasibility of measuring 5-fluorouracil catabolic potential by oral loading

The efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment and the incidence of adverse events differ among patients and depend to some extent on individual variations in drug catabolism. This feasibility study aimed to determine the optimum conditions for a 5-FU oral load test, which would allow the simple evaluation of individual differences in 5-FU catabolism. Patients with colon cancer were given oral 5-FU (200 mg/day) for 3 days (n = 36) or a single 100 mg dose (n = 14). Serum concentrations of uracil, dihydrouracil, 5-FU and 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil were measured before and after 5-FU administration. The results suggested that a decline in 5-FU metabolism was associated with continuous administration and increasing age. We conclude that a continuous load of 5-FU is necessary in order to predict the efficacy and side-effects of the drug. The 3-day regimen, with its ease of administration, merits further study to assess its possible clinical application.

Improved Analysis of 5-Fluorouracil and 5,6-Dihydro-5-Fluorouracil by HPLC With Diode Array Detection for Determination of Cellular Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Activity and Pharmacokinetic Profiling

Administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may be associated with severe toxicities in patients who are deficient of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity. For this reason, a sensitive HPLC method for the analysis of 5-FU and 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FDHU) was developed in the present study for the determination of DPD activity in nucleated cells of peripheral blood and pharmacokinetic analysis of 5-FU and 5-FDHU in humans. 5-FU and 5-FDHU were extracted from biologic matrices by adding sodium acetate, sodium sulfate, and diethyl ether/propanol. Dried samples were reconstituted in a mobile phase (KH2PO4 35 mmol/L, pH 4.0), isocratically eluted with a Hypersil C18 stationary phase (25 cm x 4.6 mm, 10 microm), and detected by a diode array detector (measurement and reference wavelengths, 215 and 360 nm, respectively). 5-Fluorocytosine (internal standard), 5-FDHU, and 5-FU were eluted within 13 minutes of the injection without interferences. Recoveries ranged between 81% to 85% for all compounds, and the method proved to be linear, with a coefficient of linearity of 0.999. The limits of detection and quantification were 3.2 and 16 ng/mL, respectively, and the within-day and between-day CV were less than 10% for both 5-FU and 5-FDHU. The present assay proved to be sufficiently sensitive and specific to evaluate cellular DPD activity and measure 5-FU and 5-FDHU plasma concentrations in cancer patients, thus allowing therapeutic 5-FU monitoring in patients and identification of DPD-deficient subjects at major risk of severe toxicities.

A Simple and Sensitive Fully Validated HPLC-UV Method for the Determination of 5-Fluorouracil and Its Metabolite 5,6-Dihydrofluorouracil in Plasma

The authors developed a simple and sensitive, fully validated HPLC-UV method for the determination of both 5-FU and its metabolite DHFU in small-volume plasma samples. The analytes were separated on a 4.6 x 250 mm ID Atlantis dC18 5-microm column with isocratic elution at room temperature. Chlorouracil was used as internal standard. The analytes were detected with an UV diode array detector. DHFU was detected at 205 nm, 5-FU at 266 nm, and chlorouracil at both wavelengths. The limits of quantification in plasma were 0.040 mug /mL for 5-FU and 0.075 microg/mL for DHFU. Linearity, accuracy, precision, recovery, dilution, freeze-thaw stability, and stability in the sample compartment were evaluated. The method appeared linear over a range from 0.04 to 15.90 microg/mL for 5-FU and from 0.075 to 3.84 microg/mL for DHFU. The method appeared very suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies of 5-FU because of its simple extraction and small sample volume. Problems in earlier published methods with interfering peaks and variable retention times were overcome. The method appeared also to be suitable for detection of uracil and its metabolite dihydrouracil in plasma.

A simple and rapid high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) assay in plasma and possible detection of patients with impaired dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity

BACKGROUND

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) gene polymorphism may lead to severe toxicity with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), a major anticancer drug extensively used in clinical oncology. Drug monitoring combined with early detection of patients at risk would enable timely dose adaptation so as to maintain drug concentrations within a therapeutic window. However, the best method to identify such patients remains to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop a rapid and simple high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method for estimating uracil/dihydrouracil (U/UH2) ratio in plasma, as an index of DPD status, and for assaying 5-FU as part of drug level monitoring.

METHOD

Assay of 5-FU, and U/UH2 detection were performed on a HPLC system equipped with UV detector. Analytes were separated at room temperature using a 5 microm particles, 25 cm RP-18 X-Terra column. The mobile-phase consisted of a KH(2)PO(4) salt solution (0.05 m) + 0.1% triethylamine (TEA) pumped at 0.4 mL/min. Detection of 5-FU and 5-bromouracil were performed at 254 nm; U and UH2 elution was monitored at 210 nm.

RESULTS

The method was sensitive and specific for assaying 5-FU within the 5-500 ng/mL concentration range, which covers exposure levels currently met in clinical practice. The method was simple, and relatively cheap, and rapid, with an analytical run time of about 30 min. Data from a patient with 5-FU toxicity suggest that the method was capable of identifying DPD metabolic phenotype in cancer patients, based on measurement of plasma U/UH2 ratio.

CONCLUSION

The method described should be suitable both for detecting patients at high risk of 5-FU toxicity, and for drug level monitoring during chemotherapy.