Sequential use of Minnesota antilymphoblast globulin and cyclosporine in cadaveric renal transplantation

Induction therapy in pediatric renal transplant recipients: an overview

Induction therapy to prevent the acute rejection of mismatched allografts with the ultimate aim of prolonging the life of the allograft has been the cornerstone of immunosuppression since the introduction of renal transplantation. Agents used for induction therapy have changed over time. Their role in transplantation is expanding to include corticosteroid avoidance and immunosuppression minimization. This review provides an overview of induction therapies for renal transplantation including historic therapies such as total lymphoid irradiation and Minnesota antilymphocyte globulin, and current therapies with polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies and chemical agents, with special emphasis on children. Data from adult studies, and pediatric studies whenever available, are summarized. A brief summary of experimental therapies with fingolimod and belatacept is provided. Historically, induction therapies were targeted at T cells. The role of induction therapies targeted at B cells is emerging in select groups of patients that include highly sensitized recipients and those receiving transplants from blood group incompatible donors. With the advent of newer maintenance immunosuppressive medications and with very low rates of acute rejection, induction protocols for renal transplantation need to be targeted so that excessive immunosuppression and infections are avoided. Several single-center and registry data analyses in children suggest that the addition of an interleukin (IL)-2 receptor antagonist may improve graft survival compared with no induction. The safety profile of IL-2 receptor antagonists is indistinguishable from that of placebo, with no apparent difference in the incidence of infection or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. IL-2 receptor antagonists and polyclonal lymphocyte-depleting antibodies offer equivalent efficacy in standard-risk populations. However, in high-risk patients, acute rejection rates and graft outcomes may be improved with the use of lymphocyte-depleting agents such as Thymoglobulin. However, cytomegalovirus infection and other infections may be more common with this therapy. Therefore, in patients at high risk of graft loss, Thymoglobulin may be the preferred choice for induction therapy, while for all other patients, IL-2 receptor antagonists should be considered the first-line choice for induction therapy. Newer lymphocyte-depleting agents such as alemtuzumab may be better utilized in minimization regimens involving one or two oral maintenance immunosuppressive agents.

Maintenance immunosuppression: new agents and persistent dilemmas

Since the approval of cyclosporine in 1983, only 3 drugs, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and sirolimus, have been approved for maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients. All 3 agents decrease the incidence of early acute allograft rejection. An increase in intermediate and long-term graft survival has not been shown. However, survival data from these clinical trials should be interpreted with caution because the studies were not designed for this purpose. All 3 drugs have significant, albeit different, safety profiles. It remains to be seen whether, the lower incidence of hypertension and hyperlipidemia seen in tacrolimus-treated patients will reduce the incidence and severity of the cardiovascular disease experienced by renal transplant recipients. Sirolimus causes severe hyperlipidemia, and the long-term consequences both on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and on lipid-associated renal injury have yet to be determined. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil appear to increase graft survival in pancreas-kidney recipients but their efficacy in another high-risk group, African-American recipients, has not yet been clearly shown. However, the trend toward improved graft survival in African-American recipients treated with tacrolimus is encouraging. Steroid-withdrawal remains a goal in the posttransplant period. The available data from steroid-withdrawal and steroid-avoidance clinical trials are mixed. Steroid withdrawal can be achieved in about 50% of patients on a cyclosporine-based immunosuppression regimen. Steroid-withdrawal under coverage of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil or Neoral (Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ) may be more successful than that achieved in patients receiving Sandimmune (Novartis Pharmaceuticals). Further studies are needed in this area.

Mechanisms of induction of renal allograft tolerance in CD45RB-treated mice

BACKGROUND

Rejection is the most significant problem in the field of transplantation. The current goal of transplant immunology is to develop better immunotherapeutic protocols that are aimed at specifically suppressing alloreactivity and preserving an otherwise intact immune system. We have previously shown that mice will accept renal allografts indefinitely with normal renal function after two injections of a monoclonal antibody to the CD45RB protein. Furthermore, this antibody will reverse acute rejection when therapy is delayed until day 4 and will still induce tolerance. The mechanisms of this therapeutic benefit are not known.

METHODS

BALB/C mice were used as recipients of major multiple histocompatibility complex-mismatched kidneys using C57BL/6 as donors. Immunoperoxidase microscopy and Northern blots for cytokine gene expression were used to study the renal allografts. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analyses of peripheral blood lymphocytes were performed. Phosphotyrosine peptide phosphatase assays were performed on splenic lymphocyte membranes.

RESULTS

A CD45RB monoclonal antibody (MB23G2) induced tolerance and partially depletes peripheral blood lymphocytes. A therapeutically ineffective CD45RB monoclonal antibody (MB4B4) merely coated the circulating lymphocytes. Furthermore, MB23G2 stimulated more tyrosine phosphatase activity than MB4B4 in mouse T-cell membranes.

CONCLUSIONS

The clearance of peripheral blood lymphocyte populations and stimulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase activity may be important in the mechanism of tolerance induction by CD45RB therapy, which may be clinically relevant in the therapy of organ rejection in humans.

Adoptively transferable tolerance induced by CD45RB monoclonal antibody

The phenomenon of rejection remains the most serious problem in transplantation. The ultimate goal in transplant immunology is to develop therapeutic strategies that lead to tolerance. It has been shown that two injections of a monoclonal antibody to CD45RB leads to indefinite acceptance of renal allografts in mice. Moreover, the CD45RB monoclonal antibody reverses acute rejection and still induces tolerance. The purpose of this study was to assess mechanisms that could underlie this therapeutic benefit. It was shown that splenic lymphocytes from tolerant animals augmented proliferation in allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reactions against donor alloantigens, and the serum of tolerant mice contained donor-specific antibodies, mainly of the IgG1 isotype, suggesting the presence of TH2 cytokines. Tolerance could not be broken by interleukin-2 infusion, but tolerance could be adoptively transferred by transfusion of tolerant mouse CD4+ splenic lymphocytes into naive allografted animals. These data suggest that an active immunoregulatory mechanism is partly responsible for the therapeutic effect. CD45RB-directed therapy may find clinical application in organ transplantation in human patients.

Prevention of transplant rejection: current treatment guidelines and future developments

In the past 2 decades, progressive improvements in the results of organ transplantation as a therapeutic strategy for patients with end-stage organ disease have been achieved due to greater insight into the immunobiology of graft rejection and better measures for surgical and medical management. It is now known that T cells play a central role in the specific immune response of acute allograft rejection. Strategies to prevent T cell activation or effector function are thus all potentially useful for immunosuppression. Standard immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation consists of baseline therapy to prevent rejection and short courses of high-dose corticosteroids or monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies as treatment of ongoing rejection episodes. Triple-drug therapy with the combination of cyclosporin, corticosteroids and azathioprine is now the most frequently used immunosuppressive drug regimen in cadaveric kidney recipients. The continuing search for more selective and specific agents has become, in the past decade, one of the priorities for transplant medicine. Some of these compounds are now entering routine clinical practice: among them are tacrolimus (which has a mechanism of action similar to that of cyclosporin), mycophenolate mofetil and mizoribine (which selectively inhibit the enzyme inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, the rate-limiting enzyme for de novo purine synthesis during cell division), and sirolimus (rapamycin) [which acts on and inhibits kinase homologues required for cell-cycle progression in response to growth factors, like interleukin-2 (IL-2)]. Other new pharmacological strategies and innovative approaches to organ transplantation are also under development. Application of this technology will offer enormous potential not only for the investigation of mechanisms and mediators of graft rejection but also for therapeutic intervention.

Recurrence of acute rejection in the absence of CD3-positive lymphocytes

Allograft rejection is the single largest impediment to successful transplantation. Therapy targeted to lymphocytes has been in practice for many years using polyclonal heteroantisera. These products are generally accepted as being useful for the prevention and treatment of rejection; however, there have been problems with specificity, lot to lot variability, and supply. Therapy with monoclonal antibodies such as OKT3 may circumvent these problems and may allow for refined specificity. OKT3 has been shown to be highly effective at reversing acute renal allograft rejection. The few treatment failures were attributed to anti-mouse antibodies eliminating the OKT3, or to delay of therapy to such a late stage that rejection was irreversible. We present two cases which demonstrate successful reversal of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplants by OKT3. The reversal was transient, however, in both cases, as both patients experienced recurrence of rejection while still receiving the monoclonal antibody. This occurred despite the absence of CD3-positive cells in the peripheral blood, and the presence of excess OKT3 in the serum. This implies that CD3-negative lymphocytes may under certain circumstances contribute to the rejection phenomenon.

Effect of cyclosporine on the kidney

Cyclosporine constitutes a major advance in pharmacologic immunosuppression, the benefit of which is now established for solid organ transplantation and is rapidly emerging for many forms of autoimmune disease. By virtue of its potency and selectivity, there has been a marked reduction in steroid requirement with a concomitant reduction in morbidity and mortality. The undesirable effect of cyclosporine on the kidney may thus be considered within this context. The short-term functional effect observed to some degree in most patients receiving this drug is rapidly reversible, and is unaccompanied by long-term detriment in studies now extending over 6 years. Progressive deterioration still occurs in a small proportion of patients, but may often be reversed by carefully controlled conversion to alternative combination immunosuppression therapy. For each developing application, the ultimate value of cyclosporine must be determined individually in relation to the severity of the disease process. The challenge that now confronts us is to determine the manner in which this agent may be most safely and effectively used.

The selective use of antilymphocyte serum for cyclosporine treated patients with renal allograft dysfunction

Eighty-seven adult renal allograft recipients were initially treated with cyclosporine-prednisone immunosuppression. Thirty patients experienced no episode of rejection. Antilymphocyte antibody therapy (ALS) was administered to 21 of the 68 recipients of cadaveric donor allografts for either primary allograft dysfunction or acute rejection, and to 6 of 19 recipients of haploidentical, living-related allografts because of steroid-resistant rejection. The cumulative allograft and patient survival for the entire series (follow-up 9-36 months) was 84% and 95%, respectively. This improvement in the rate of successful transplantation can be attributed to the selective addition of ALS therapy to recipients with specific instances of renal allograft dysfunction. In this report, the indications for the use of ALS preparations following prophylactic CsA immunosuppression are reviewed. Experience with the protocols of the ALS administration is also discussed. In selected cases, the administration of either ATG or OKT3 can significantly benefit CsA recipients who experience either primary allograft nonfunction or an epidose of acute rejection.

Graft survival and long-term renal function after sequential conventional cyclosporin A therapy in cadaver kidney transplantation--a prospective randomized trial

In a prospective randomized trial 50 renal transplant patients (group A) received a sequential course of 14 days conventional immunosuppression (Lymphocytoglobulin (ALG), azathioprine, steroids) and cyclosporin and steroids thereafter, while 50 patients (group B) received the conventional immunosuppression for 7 days followed by cyclosporin and steroids. In the latter group ALG was tolerated for the whole period while in the first group conversion from conventional to cyclosporin A therapy had to be performed after a mean of 11 days, due to ALG intolerance. Actual patient survival rates 1 year posttransplant were 100% in both groups and graft survival rates 96% in group A and 86% in group B (P less than 0.05). There was a mean dialysis frequency per patient of 0.7 +/- 2.0 in group A and 1.8 +/- 3.4 in group B (P = 0.064). Serum creatinine 1 year posttransplant was 1.8 +/- 0.8 mg/dl in group A and 2.2 +/- 1.4 in group B. A total of 58 patients had a serum creatinine of less than 2 mg/dl at the time of conversion to cyclosporin. These patients had a significantly better graft survival rate (98.3%) and serum creatinine 1 year posttransplant (1.6 +/- 0.5 mg/dl) than the 40 patients with a serum creatinine of more than 2 mg/dl at the time of conversion (85%; 2.4 +/- 1.4 mg/dl), indicating that a delayed onset of cyclosporin therapy might benefit the kidney in the immediate posttransplant period when it is susceptible to nephrotoxicity due to the damage from hypothermic storage.