Significance of delayed graft function in cyclosporine-treated recipients of cadaver kidney transplants

Delayed Graft Function, Predictive Factors, and 7-Year Outcome of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients With Different Immunologic Profiles

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is the major post-transplant cause of deleterious effects to the allograft and is associated with poor allograft survival. The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of 236 kidney transplant recipients with different immunologic profiles.

METHODS

All patients underwent transplantation (2008-2016) with a deceased donor at the University Hospital of the Faculty of Medical Science, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to immunologic profiles: nonsensitized (NS), sensitized without donor-specific antibody (SDSA-), or sensitized with donor-specific antibody (SDSA+).

RESULTS

DGF was observed in 128 (54.24%), including 63 (49.22%) NS, 51 (39.84%) SDSA-, and 14 (10.94%) SDSA+ patients. The development of DGF was associated with dialysis for ≥49.25 months (odds ratio [OR] 2.30), donor age ≥42.25 years (OR 1.77), donor end creatinine level >1.22 mg/dL (OR 1.94), and cold ischemia time >12 hours (OR 2.45). Of the 55 patients with rejections, 37 (15.68%) had T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and 18 (7.63%) had antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Nine patients (16.36%) exhibited graft loss, 2 (0.85%) via TCMR in the SDSA- DGF+ group and 7 (2.97%) via AMR, including 2 NS DGF-, 2 SDSA- DGF-, 1 SDSA- DGF+, and 2 SDSA+ DGF+ patients. Graft survival significantly differed between the NSDGF- and SDSA- DGF+ groups (P = .014) and between the NS DGF- and SDSA+ DGF- groups (P = .036).

CONCLUSION

In the 7-year period following transplantation, TCMR was more prevalent than AMR among patients with DGF. Graft loss was less prevalent among patients with TCMR than among those with AMR.

Defining delayed graft function after renal transplantation: simplest is best

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation can be diagnosed according to several different definitions, complicating comparison between studies that use DGF as an endpoint. This is a particular problem after transplantation with kidneys from donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidneys, because DGF is common, and its relationship to early graft failure may differ depending on the definition of DGF.

METHODS

The presence of DGF in 213 donation after brain death (DBD) and 312 DCD kidney transplants from October 2005 to August 2011 was determined according to 10 different, but widely used, definitions (based on dialysis requirements, creatinine changes, or both). The relationship of DGF to graft function and graft survival was determined.

RESULTS

The incidence of DGF varied widely depending on the definition used (DBD; 24%-70%: DCD; 41%-91%). For kidneys from DCD donors, development of DGF was only associated with poorer 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate for 1 of 10 definitions of DGF, and no definition of DGF was associated with impaired graft survival. Conversely, for DBD kidneys, DGF, as defined in 9 of 10 different ways, was associated with poorer 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate and inferior graft survival. Importantly, the predictive power for poorer transplant outcome was comparable for all definitions of DGF.

CONCLUSION

No definition of DGF is superior. We suggest that the most widely used and most easily calculated definition--the use of dialysis in the first postoperative week--should be universally adopted as the definition of DGF clinically and as a study endpoint.

Association between delayed graft function and allograft and patient survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication of renal transplantation. The short-term consequences of DGF are well known, but the long-term relationship between DGF and patient and graft survival is controversial in the published literature. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to precisely estimate these relationships.

METHODS

We performed a literature search for original studies published through March 2007 pertaining to long-term (>6 months) outcomes of DGF. The primary outcome was graft survival. Secondary outcomes were patient survival, acute rejection and kidney function.

RESULTS

When compared to patients without DGF, patients with DGF had a 41% increased risk of graft loss (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.27-1.56) at 3.2 years of follow-up. There was no significant relationship between DGF and patient survival at 5 years (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.94-1.39). The mean creatinine in the non-DGF group was 1.6 mg/dl. Patients with DGF had a higher mean serum creatinine (0.66 mg/dl, 95% CI 0.57-0.74) compared to patients without DGF at 3.5 years of follow-up. DGF was associated with a 38% relative increase in the risk of acute rejection (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.29-1.47).

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis emphasize and quantify the long-term detrimental association between DGF and important graft outcomes like graft survival, acute rejection and renal function. Efforts to prevent and treat DGF should be aggressively investigated in order to improve graft survival given the deficit in the number of kidney donors.

Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The term delayed graft function (DGF) is commonly used to describe the need for dialysis after receiving a kidney transplant. DGF increases morbidity after transplantation, prolongs hospitalization and may lead to premature graft failure. Various definitions of DGF are used in the literature without a uniformly accepted technique to identify DGF.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify all of the different definitions and diagnostic techniques to identify DGF.

RESULTS

We identified 18 unique definitions for DGF and 10 diagnostic techniques to identify DGF.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of heterogeneous clinical criteria to define DGF has certain limitations. It will lead to delayed and sometimes inaccurate diagnosis of DGF. Hence a diagnostic test that identifies DGF reliably and early is necessary. Heterogeneity, in the definitions used for DGF, hinders the evolution of a diagnostic technique to identify DGF, which requires a gold standard definition. We are in need of a new definition that is uniformly accepted across the kidney transplant community. The new definition will be helpful in promoting better communication among transplant professionals and aids in comparing clinical studies of diagnostic techniques to identify DGF and thus may facilitate clinical trials of interventions for the treatment of DGF.

Low-dose versus high-dose cyclosporine induction protocols in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Current immunosuppressive therapies are effective to prevent acute rejection episodes (ARE) and graft loss following renal transplantation. Newer agents now make it possible to develop equally efficacious but better tolerated, less toxic strategies. We compared the efficacy of early low- versus high-dose cyclosporine (CsA) induction therapy in living donor renal transplantation.

METHODS

In this single-center study, 90 consecutive recipients of living donor kidney transplants between November 2002 to October 2003 including 51 females and mean average age of 48.23 years were treated with either CsA (5 mg/kg/d) plus mycophenolae mofetil (MMF; 30 mg/kg/d) and prednisolone (1 mg/kg/d; group 1; n=42); or CsA (8 mg/kg/d) plus MMF (30 mg/kg/d) and prednisolone (1 mg/kg/d; group 2; n=48). The 2 groups were matched with respect to age, sex, underlying renal diseases, pretransplantation dialysis period, number of transplantations, and panel-reactive antibody tests. CsA dose tapering was initiated in the 2 group 3 months after transplantation. At the end of the first year, the CsA dose was 3.5 +/- 0.65 mg/kg in group 1 and 3.4 +/- 0.34 mg/kg in group 2. Prednisolone was tapered within the first 2 months, reaching 10 mg/d in all patients. The MMF dose remained unchanged. The 2 groups were compared with respect to ARE, patient and graft survivals, and clinical outcomes within 2 years after transplantation.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to clinical outcomes, including 2-year patient survival (97.62% vs 97.92%; P=.76), 2-year graft survival (80.32% vs 80.41%; P=.82), ARE (47.61% vs 52.08%; P=.09), or length of immediate postsurgical hospital stay, number of readmissions, total hospitalization days, posttransplantation diabetes mellitus, and infectious, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and hematologic complications. There was more hypertension (67.5% vs 50.23%; P=.007), hypertriglyceridemia (45.5% vs 32.64%; P=.005), and elevated liver enzymes in group 2 (12.5% vs 7.14%; P=.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with 8 mg/kg CsA induction therapy, the lower doses of CsA were effective, well tolerated, and safe with relatively fewer side effects.

La reprise retardée de fonction : une complication fréquente, non résolue, en transplantation rénale

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a frequent and well-known complication of renal transplantation, which occurs in 30% of cadaver kidney allografts. It has an economic cost that is the result of prolonged patient hospitalization and the need for hemodialysis sessions; it also increases the risk of acute allograft rejection and may affect long-term graft survival. Lots of risk factors were identified, like donor hemodynamic compromise or prolonged cold ischemia time; however, incidence of DGF remains high due to the frequent use of marginal donors due to organ shortage. Recent advances in the pathophysiology of DGF point the importance of the ischemia-reperfusion injury mechanisms and some therapeutics that may reduce them are under investigation, like the use of new solutions to improve organ preservation and the use of some antioxidant and anti-inflammatory drugs.

A controlled trial comparing two doses of cyclosporine in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids

It is unknown whether the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone after renal transplantation (RTx) allows for a reduced dose of CsA, to minimize the incidence of CsA-related side effects and to reduce costs. Therefore, 313 renal allograft recipients were randomized for treatment with MMF (1000 mg twice a day), prednisone, and either conventional- or low-dose CsA during the first 3 mo after RTx. The target trough levels were 300 and 150 ng/ml, respectively, during the first 3 mo and 150 ng/ml in both groups thereafter. A total of 313 patients were included: 161 patients received a conventional dose and 152 received a low dose of CsA. During the first 6 mo after RTx, graft failure or patient death occurred in 19 of 161 patients (12%) in the conventional-dose group and in 11 of 152 patients (7%) in the low-dose group (not significant). Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 36 of 161 patients (22%) in the conventional-dose group and in 29 of 152 patients (19%) in the low-dose group (not significant). The incidence of delayed graft function was similar in both groups (31 of 161 [19%] versus 28 of 152 [18%]; not significant). Serum creatinine did not differ between the conventional- and the low-dose groups: 151 +/- 56 micromol/L versus 142 +/- 49 micromol/L at 3 mo and 141 +/- 60 micromol/L versus 136 +/- 49 micromol/L at 6 mo. There were no differences between the groups regarding BP, lipid metabolism, and infectious complications. In the low-dose group, an estimated $500 per patient was saved on the costs of CsA. In conclusion, the addition of MMF to CsA and prednisone after RTx allows the use of a lower-than-conventional dose of CsA, without increasing the risk of rejection.

Peritoneal dialysis favorably influences early graft function after renal transplantation compared to hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) and acute renal failure (ARF) after renal transplantation negatively influence short- and long-term graft outcome. Peritoneal dialysis as pretransplantation dialysis modality was reported to influence favorably the recovery of renal function immediately after kidney transplantation. It has been hypothesized that fluid status was the factor explaining this better outcome. This hypothesis was tested in this study by multivariate analysis, also including other factors related to DGF and ARF.

METHODS

The records of peritoneal dialysis (PD; n=40) and hemodialysis (HD; n=79) patients receiving a first cadaveric kidney transplantation at the University Hospital Gent were analyzed.

RESULTS

DGF and ARF were observed in 33 (27 HD and 6 PD, P=0.03) and 14 (14 HD and 0 PD, P=0.01) patients, respectively. The number of days needed to reach a serum creatinine 50% below that before transplantation (T1/2(SCr)), was correlated with cold ischemia time (CIT) (P<0.001) and body weight gain (BWG) (P<0.01) and was inversely correlated with urinary output in the first 24 hr (P<0.001), fluid load (P<0.001), and central venous pressure (P<0.001). A multivariate model with CIT (P<0.001), PD as pretransplantation dialysis mode (P=0.01), urinary output in the first 24 hr (P=0.001), BWG (P=0.05), and fluid load (P=0.01) resulted in an R2 of 0.32 (P<0.001). Using Cox regression analysis, the relative risk for a prolonged T1/2(SCr) increased with 4%/hr CIT (P=0.01) and with 1%/kg BWG (P=0.02). Fluid load decreased the relative risk with 5%/liter (P<0.001) and PD as pretransplantation modality favorably modified the relative risk by a factor of 1.6 (P=0.01).

CONCLUSION

PD as pretransplantation dialysis modality can reduce the incidence and the severity of delayed recovery of renal function after renal transplantation. This protective effect was independent from CIT, and fluid status, two other major influencing factors.

Predictors of renal transplant histology at three months

BACKGROUND

The quality of a damaged kidney, the complexity of the surgery, and the events in the first weeks after transplantation, such as delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection, may influence its histological appearance and long-term survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of these factors in predicting renal allograft histology at 3 months.

METHODS

Prospective, protocol kidney biopsy specimens (n=112), obtained 3 months after transplantation, were scored for chronic damage by the Banff schema and evaluated by multivariate analysis against donor factors, implantation histology, prior recipient sensitization, ischemia, perioperative factors, and subsequent clinical events, such as DGF and acute rejection.

RESULTS

Adequate samples were obtained in 102 of 112 biopsies and classified as chronic Banff grade 0 (n=22), grade I (n=56), grade II (n=23), or grade III (n=1). Acute Banff scores were minimal. DGF occurred in 49% and was the strongest predictor of tubulointerstitial damage at 3 months. DGF correlated with acute tubular necrosis on the implantation biopsy specimen and with the number of acute rejection episodes; DGF also correlated with the Banff grades of chronic glomerulitis, chronic interstitial fibrosis, and tubular atrophy scores (P<0.05-0.001) in the 3-month biopsy specimen. By multivariate analysis, chronic tubular atrophy was independently predicted by the presence of vascular disease in the donor biopsy specimen, DGF, and vascular rejection occurring within the first 3 months (P<0.05-0.001). Chronic interstitial fibrosis was unrelated to fibrosis in the donor biopsy specimen but was independently predicted by DGF, donor age, and vascular rejection (P<0.05-0.001). Vascular disease in the donor biopsy specimen correlated with chronic intimal thickening (r=0.36, P<0.01) and arteriolar hyalinosis score (r=0.54, P<0.001) on the 3-month biopsy specimen. Banff chronic intimal vascular thickening was independently predicted by donor biopsy specimen vascular grade, prior vascular rejection episodes, and renal cold ischemia time (P<0.05-0.01). There were no correlates with the mean cyclosporine (CsA) dose, blood levels, diagnosis of CsA toxicity, or cellular rejection within the first 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated that the quality of the donor organ at implantation was strongly predictive of subsequent renal histology in grafts functioning at 3 months. Vascular rejection and DGF had a significant long-term effect on graft damage, but cellular rejection and simple measures of CsA exposure did not.

Delayed graft function does not reduce the survival of renal transplant allografts

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of delayed graft function (DGF) in graft outcome when adjusted by the presence of acute rejection in the first month after transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 437 cadaveric renal transplant patients on cyclosporine and steroids were included in the study. Variables related to donor, recipient, and graft were prospectively collected.

RESULTS

The incidence of DGF was 44.4%. When patients dying with a functioning graft were censored, graft survival rates at 1 and 6 years were similar in patients with immediate function to those with DGF, when rejection was not present (96% and 81% vs. 95% and 83%, respectively). Rejection negatively influenced graft survival rates at 1 and 6 years, both in patients with immediate graft function (80% and 73%, P<0.05 vs. no DGF/no rejection) and more deeply in those with associated DGF (77% and 62%, P<0.001 vs. no DGF/no rejection). Rejection was more frequently diagnosed in patients with DGF than in those with immediate graft function (50% vs. 39.9%, P<0.05). Length of hospitalization was longer and the number of needle core biopsies was higher in patients with DGF or rejection. The presence of both complications had an additive effect.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that DGF did not adversely affect kidney graft survival in patients without rejection. However, it increased the length of hospitalization and the number of graft biopsies, thus increasing the cost of transplantation. Moreover, rejection was more frequent in patients with DGF, and it had a negative impact on graft outcome. Because the association of DGF and rejection gave the poorest outcome, an effort should be made to prevent both complications.

Ischemia/reperfusion injury in human kidney transplantation: an immunohistochemical analysis of changes after reperfusion

Organs used for transplantation undergo varying degrees of cold ischemia and reperfusion injury after transplantation. In renal transplantation, prolonged cold ischemia is strongly associated with delayed graft function, an event that contributes to inferior graft survival. At present, the pathophysiological changes associated with ischemia/reperfusion injury in clinical renal transplantation are poorly understood. We have performed an immunohistochemical analysis of pre- and postreperfusion biopsies obtained from cadaver (n = 55) and living/related donor (LRD) (n = 11) renal allografts using antibodies to adhesion molecules and leukocyte markers to investigate the intragraft changes after cold preservation and reperfusion. Neutrophil infiltration and P-selectin expression were detected after reperfusion in 29 of 55 (53%) and 24 of 55 (44%) cadaver renal allografts, respectively. In marked contrast, neutrophil infiltration was not observed in LRD allografts, and only 1 of 11 (9%) had an increased level of P-selectin after reperfusion. Immunofluorescent double-staining demonstrated that P-selectin expression resulted from platelet deposition and not from endothelial activation. No statistically significant association was observed between neutrophil infiltration and P-selectin expression in the glomeruli or intertubular capillaries despite the large number of cadaver renal allografts with postreperfusion changes. Neutrophil infiltration into the glomeruli was significantly associated with long cold ischemia times and delayed graft function. Elevated serum creatinine levels at 3 and 6 months after transplantation were also associated with the presence of neutrophils and platelets after reperfusion. Our results suggest that graft function may be influenced by early inflammatory events after reperfusion, which can be targeted for future therapeutic intervention.

Paediatric kidney transplantation

Renal transplantation is the optimal form of renal replacement therapy leading to substantial improvement in the quality of life. It has rapidly become the standard treatment for end-stage renal disease in children. However, despite impressive short-term results significant long-term problems remain unsolved. Because of the lack of effective treatment for chronic rejection and common recipient noncompliance, allograft half-life has not improved significantly during the last decade. A paediatric recipient is likely to need several retransplantations in adulthood. Moreover, the immunosuppressive drugs used today have potentially serious side-effects including nephrotoxicity and de novo malignancy. These are especially relevant for paediatric recipients who will continue to receive therapy for several decades. Most therapeutic protocols used for children are derived from those used for adults. However, the metabolic differences between an adult and a growing and developing paediatric transplant recipient are not always adequately appreciated before these new therapies are initiated. In the near future, we are likely to see new and more efficient drugs become available. It is important that we try to understand their properties in children and use them and our current arsenal on an individual basis aiming at optimal graft survival but also at avoiding unnecessary adverse effects.

Delayed graft function: risk factors and implications for renal allograft survival

Delayed graft function (DGF) may be associated with diminished kidney allograft survival. We studied the risk factors that lead to nonimmediate function of a renal allograft and the consequences of DGF on short- and long-term renal transplant survival. Data from the U.S. Renal Data System were used to measure the relationships among cold ischemia time, delayed graft function, acute rejection, and graft survival in 37,216 primary cadaveric renal transplants (1985-1992). These relationships were investigated using the unconditional logistic and Cox multivariate regression methods. Cold ischemia time was strongly associated with DGF, with a 23% increase in the risk of DGF for every 6 hr of cold ischemia (P<0.001). Acute transplant rejection occurred more frequently in grafts with delayed function (37% vs. 20%; odds ratio=2.25, P=0.001). DGF was independently predictive of 5-year graft loss (relative risk=1.53, P<0.001). The presence of both early acute rejection and DGF portended a dismal 5-year graft survival rate of 35%. Zero-HLA mismatch conferred a 10-15% improvement in 1- and 5-year graft survival regardless of early functional status of the allograft. However, the 5-year graft survival rate in HLA-mismatched kidneys without DGF was significantly higher than that of zero-mismatched kidneys with DGF (63% vs. 51%; P<0.001). DGF independently portends a significant reduction in short- and long-term graft survival. Delayed function and early rejection episodes exerted an additive adverse effect on allograft survival. The deleterious impact of delayed function is comparatively more severe than that of poor HLA matching.

Short-term outcome of kidney transplants from non-heart-beating donors after preservation by machine perfusion

In this study, the short-term outcome of renal transplants from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) preserved by machine perfusion (MP) is evaluated and compared to preservation by cold storage (CS). Twenty-two NHBD kidneys were procured during 1993 and 1994 after in situ perfusion with histidine-tryptophan ketoglutarate and preserved by continuous perfusion using University of Wisconsin organ preservation solution for MP as a perfusate. Between 1980 and 1992, 57 NHBD kidneys were procured and preserved by CS. Donors in the MP group sustained increased first warm ischemia times (WIT1) (P < 0.1) and recipients in the MP group suffered longer anastomosis time, worse HLA-DR mismatch, and more initial use of cyclosporin as immunosuppressant; all these factors are known to be deleterious to short-term outcome. Despite these unfavorable conditions, delayed function (DF) rate was decreased in the MP group, although not significantly. However, when considering only kidneys with WIT1 > or = 45 min, short-term outcome was significantly better in the MP group (P < 0.05). We conclude that MP is superior for the preservation of NHBD kidneys, especially after prolonged warm ischemia.

Chronic rejection and late renal allograft dysfunction

Renal transplantation is currently standard therapy for end-stage kidney disease for children. Despite the considerable improvement in short-term results, the expected allograft half-life has remained the same. This is due to chronic rejection/late graft dysfunction which has proved resistant to therapeutic attempts. During the last few years the multifactorial pathogenesis of chronic renal allograft rejection has been clarified to some extent. Early injury by immunological and non-immunological mechanisms is followed by vascular remodelling due to repetitive cycles of cytokine release, upregulation of growth factors, and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. This leads to typical concentric arteriosclerosis and ischemia. Secondary kidney-specific mechanisms are initiated by the reduction in functioning renal mass and lead to gradual progression of chronic rejection. There is no single optimal therapy. Several attempts to influence the pathophysiological cascade have been promising. Attention should be focused on minimizing early immunological/non-immunological injury in order to attenuate future progression of chronic rejection. A significant prolongation of allograft half-life may be achieved during the next decade with the introduction of new therapeutic agents and comprehensive approach to treatment. This would be especially beneficial for pediatric recipients, reducing the need for retransplantation in adulthood.

Short-term outcome of kidney transplants from non-heart-beating donors after preservation by machine perfusion

In this study, the short-term outcome of renal transplants from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) preserved by machine perfusion (MP) is evaluated and compared to preservation by cold storage (CS). Twenty-two NHBD kidneys were procured during 1993 and 1994 after in situ perfusion with histidine-tryptophan ketoglutarate and preserved by continuous perfusion using University of Wisconsin organ preservation solution for MP as a perfusate. Between 1980 and 1992, 57 NHBD kidneys were procured and preserved by CS. Donors in the MP group sustained increased first warm ischemia times (WIT1) (P < 0.1) and recipients in the MP group suffered longer anastomosis time, worse HLA-DR mismatch, and more initial use of cyclosporin as immunosuppressant; all these factors are known to be deleterious to short-term outcome. Despite these unfavorable conditions, delayed function (DF) rate was decreased in the MP group, although not significantly. However, when considering only kidneys with WIT1 > or = 45 min, short-term outcome was significantly better in the MP group (P < 0.05). We conclude that MP is superior for the preservation of NHBD kidneys, especially after prolonged warm ischemia.

Ten years of training community urologists and general surgeons to do cadaver kidney retrievals

We trained 82 community hospital cadaver kidney retrieval teams during a 10-year period ending June 30, 1987. During the last 5 years of that period the concept of multiple organ retrieval was introduced into the training sessions and 429 cadaver kidney grafts were retrieved. Of those kidneys 292 were transplanted at our hospital, and the function of 220 cadaver kidney grafts retrieved by the community hospital teams was compared to that of 72 retrieved by the transplant center retrieval team. Of the cadaver kidney transplants 114 were from multiple organ donors. There was no significant difference in 1-month serum creatinine nadir of surviving grafts (2.1 +/- 1.8 versus 1.9 +/- 1.7 mg. per dl.), 6-month serum creatinine level (1.7 +/- 0.8 versus 1.6 +/- 0.6 mg. per dl.), 12-month serum creatinine level (1.8 +/- 0.9 versus 1.6 +/- 0.6 mg. per dl.) and 5-year actuarial graft survival (44.8 +/- 4.1 versus 52.4 +/- 7.5%), with the community hospital data presented first. The delayed graft function rate was significantly higher in the recipients of cadaver kidney grafts retrieved by community hospital teams (54 versus 35%), which was reduced by the in situ flush technique. There was no significant difference in delayed graft function rate (48 versus 40%) for the 114 cadaver kidney transplants retrieved from multiple organ donors by either community hospital or transplant center teams. With continuing education and quality control, community hospital retrieval teams can provide kidneys satisfactory for transplantation, even when working with multiple organ retrieval teams.