Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine G in patients with renal failure

Comparative pharmacokinetics and renal effects of cyclosporin A and cyclosporin G in renal allograft recipients

Cyclosporin G (CSG) has produced less nephrotoxicity than cyclosporin A (CSA) at equivalent doses in animal models. Conflicting results have been reported concerning differences in the pharmacokinetics of CSA and CSG in preclinical studies, and no data exist regarding the effect of steady-state oral administration of CSG on renal function in transplant patients or CSG-induced release of endothelin and nitric oxide (NO) in vivo. The objective of the study was to examine steady-state pharmacokinetic profiles of adult renal allograft recipients receiving CSA and CSG in relation to concentrations of endothelin-1 and NO2/NO3 in urine and plasma, creatinine clearance (Clcr), and urinary excretion of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) 9 months after transplantation. Concentrations of CSA and CSG were measured in whole blood over a 12-hour dose interval by both a monoclonal and polyclonal fluorescence polarization radioimmunoassay for CSA. A metabolite fraction was defined as the numerical difference between the levels obtained at each time point by both assays. Patient groups were defined as follows: group 1: initial CSA (n = 6); group 2: initial CSG (n = 7); group 3: five of the seven patients in group 2 taking CSG subsequently undergoing conversion to CSA; group 4: the same five patients in group 3 restudied 1 month after 1:1 dosage conversion to CSA; and group 5: CSA groups 1 and 4 combined (n = 11). In group 1, the metabolite fraction accounted for 32% to 54% of the total measurable drug concentration at each time point, whereas in group 2, the metabolite fraction accounted for at most 10% to 15% of the total drug levels measurable by polyclonal fluorescence polarization radioimmunoassay. Although there were no significant differences in any of the mean pharmacokinetic parameters between groups using monoclonal fluorescence polarization radioimmunoassay, the normalized area under the concentration-time curve (NAUC) value was less in four of five patients after conversion from CSG to CSA, with a more variable and delayed time to reach peak concentration (tmax) but equivalent apparent oral clearance (Clpa) values. Clcr was found to change significantly with time in groups 1 and 5 but not in group 2, with CSA producing a more profound and sustained decrease than CSG. Endothelin-1 and NO2/NO3 levels in plasma and urine remained relatively constant after administration of both CSA and CSG, and there were no significant differences between groups 3 and 4 regarding mean endothelin-1 and NO2/NO3 concentrations in plasma, urinary release of endothelin-1 and NO2/NO3, and mean AUC of endothelin-1 and AUC of NO2/NO3. However, monoclonal NAUC correlated significantly with total urinary endothelin-1 within CSA groups 1 and 5 but not within CSG group 2. Metabolite NAUC correlated significantly with total urinary NAG within CSA group 1. Although limited by the small number of patients, this study suggests that 1) CSG may produce less of a reduction in Clcr over time after oral administration at steady state than does CSA, and 2) this beneficial effect of CSG may be in part due to decreased intrarenal release of endothelin-1, as urinary excretion of endothelin-1 seemed to correlate better with CSA than with CSG exposure.

Metabolism of the new immunosuppressor cyclosporin G by human liver cytochromes P450

Cyclosporin G is a new immunosuppressor structurally similar to cyclosporin A. Although this drug is pharmacologically as active as cyclosporin A, it is less toxic, in particular at the kidney level. The aim of this work was to identify the enzyme system(s) involved in the oxidative metabolism of cyclosporin G in man: (1) in a bank of human liver microsomes (n = 22), cyclosporin G oxidase activity correlated significantly with cyclosporin A oxidase activity (P < 0.0001) and with the level of CYP3A4 (P < 0.002), determined by immunoblot; (2) specific inhibitors of CYP3A4, troleandomycin, and ketoconazole, inhibited cyclosporin G oxidase activity by more than 80%; (3) antiCYP3A4 antibodies specifically inhibited this activity by nearly 90%; (4) cyclosporin A was a competitive inhibitor of cyclosporin G oxidase and vice versa; (5). Among a battery of cDNA-expressed CYPs, only CYP3A4 was able to generate detectable amounts of metabolites of cyclosporin G and cyclosporin A with a turnover number close to that calculated from experiments with liver microsomes; (6) in human hepatocytes in culture, pretreatment of cells with rifampicin and phenobarbital, 2 inducers of CYP3A4, produced a great increase in cyclosporin G oxidase activity, while beta-naphthoflavone, an inducer of CYP1As, did not. We conclude that CYP3A4 is the major enzyme involved in the oxidative metabolism of cyclosporin G in human liver.

Concentration-guided strategies in drug development: experience with a cyclosporine analog in transplantation

A concentration-guided study was designed to maintain adequate immunosuppression and avoid excessive drug exposure while determining steady-state relative bioavailability of two cyclosporine G (CyG) oral formulations in stable renal transplant patients. In period I (week 1), 26 patients taking cyclosporine A (CyA)-based immunosuppressive regimens entered the study. Doses were titrated to maintain trough concentrations within a predefined range, as measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). Patients were given an oral solution of CyG in period II (weeks 2-3), and a microemulsion capsule formulation of CyG in period III (weeks 4-5), with dose titration as necessary to achieve trough concentrations in a predefined range, as measured by FPIA. Full pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained on the last day of each study period. Treatment with CyA was reinitiated in period IV (week 6) at the same doses as at study entry. All blood samples were analyzed at the conclusion of the study using CyG- and CyA-specific high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). When changing from oral solution to capsule for CyG, an average 19% dose reduction was necessary to compensate for the elevated trough concentrations resulting from the increased bioavailability of the capsule formulation. The concentration-guided strategy was successful in avoiding over-exposure, and resulted in comparable values for area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for both formulations of CyG. Dose normalization of the pharmacokinetic parameters subsequently allowed calculation of the relative bioavailability. Specifically, a faster rate and greater extent of CyG absorption from the capsule than the oral solution were manifested as a slightly earlier time to peak concentration (tmax), an average 44% increase in the maximum concentration (Cmax), and an average 29% increase in AUC. This experience demonstrated that a concentration-guided trial design allowed a drug development question for a compound with a narrow therapeutic index to be addressed safely and directly in the target patient population.

Experimental nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin G versus cyclosporin A

Cyclosporin G (CsG) is an analogue of cyclosporin A (CsA) with strong immunosuppressive activity. We compared these two drugs in a rat model in which salt depletion promotes irreversible renal interstitial fibrosis with renal dysfunction in animals given CsA for three weeks. When both drugs were given in the same dosage on a weight basis (15 mg/kg/day, subcutaneously), CsA blood levels were higher than CsG (3305 vs. 1824 ng/ml, P < 0.001). This could be explained by a higher CsG clearance (6.4 vs. 4.3 ml/min/kg in CsA, P < 0.0001) resulting in smaller CsG area under the curve. There was also lower renal and hepatic CsG tissue concentrations. CsA induced a dramatic decrease in GFR, 0.14 in CsA versus 0.67 ml/min/100 g in control, P < 0.001, and increased urinary excretion of N-acetyl beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), 21 in CsA versus 13 IU/gCr in control rats, P < 0.001. CsG-treated and control rats had similar GFR and urinary NAG. When CsA dosage was decreased to 7.5 mg/kg blood levels were similar to those found with CsG 15 mg/kg. CsA at this dose caused a reduced GFR (0.29 ml/min/100 g) and an increased urinary NAG (20 IU/gCr) (P < 0.01 vs. control for both). Both dosages of CsA induced considerable cortical and medullary injury (interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy), more severe than the histological damage found in CsG-treated rats. Neither drug promoted significant changes in liver function or histology.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A masked, randomized, dose-response study between cyclosporine A and G in the treatment of sight-threatening uveitis of noninfectious origin

Thirty-two patients with sight-threatening uveitis and a decrease in visual acuity requiring systemic therapy were randomly assigned to either cyclosporine A or G in a dose-escalation study. Groups received from 2.5 mg/kg of body weight/day to 10 mg/kg of body weight/day of either drug along with low-dose prednisone. More patients taking cyclosporine G had improved visual acuity and a decrease in macular edema, which occurred more rapidly than in the other group, even at the lower doses tested. No difference in renal function was noted between groups at any doses tested. Four patients receiving cyclosporine G had hepatic alterations, but only one required cessation of the drug. The study indicates the potential usefulness of cyclosporine G, particularly at lower doses (4 mg/kg of body weight/day), which could lower the potential for serious renal complications.

A randomized pilot study of cyclosporin G in renal transplantation

Animal studies have suggested that the analogue cyclosporin G (CyG) may be less nephrotoxic than cyclosporin A (CyA). A pilot study was therefore performed in 10 primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients who were randomized to receive posttransplant immunosuppression with either CyA or CyG. The follow-up time was a minimum of 1 year. One graft was lost in each group. All patients in both groups experienced at least one acute rejection episode. Episodes of acute nephrotoxicity were observed in both groups. Renal function, as assessed by determinations of the serum creatinine level and chromium-ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (Cr-EDTA) clearance, did not differ between the two groups. Renal allograft biopsies showed a significantly higher degree of fibrosis in the CyG group than in the CyA group. All CyG-treated patients evidenced laboratory signs of acute liver toxicity, which was dose-dependent and reversible. Today, all CyG-treated patients have been switched to CyA. This study shows that immunosuppression after renal transplantation in man is possible with CyG; however, it does not seem to have any advantages over CyA.

Cyclosporine analogues

Numerous analogues of cyclosporine A (CsA) have been produced and studied. Although these analogues have given considerable insight into structure-activity relationships, none have been shown to have the safety and efficacy of CsA. The most promising of these analogues is cyclosporine G (CsG) in which norvaline is substituted for alpha-aminobutyric acid at the 2 position. Comparative studies of CsG and CsA in animals have produced conflicting results both in terms of nephrotoxicity and the effectiveness of CsG as an immunosuppressive agent. It is evident from these studies that there exist species and strain differences in the metabolism of CsG, sensitivity to its toxic effects and, probably, to its immunological effectiveness. Studies will have to be performed in humans to determine whether, for a given immunosuppressive effect, CsG is less or more toxic than CsA.