Cadaveric renal transplantation with cyclosporine in patients more than 60 years of age

NK Cells Contribute to the Immune Risk Profile in Kidney Transplant Candidates

Background: A previously proposed immune risk profile (IRP), based on T cell phenotype and CMV serotype, is associated with mortality in the elderly and increased infections post-kidney transplant. To evaluate if NK cells contribute to the IRP and if the IRP can be predicted by a clinical T cell functional assays, we conducted a cross sectional study in renal transplant candidates to determine the incidence of IRP and its association with specific NK cell characteristics and ImmuKnow® value.

Material and Methods: Sixty five subjects were enrolled in 5 cohorts designated by age and dialysis status. We determined T and NK cell phenotypes by flow cytometry and analyzed multiple factors contributing to IRP.

Results: We identified 14 IRP+ [CMV seropositivity and CD4/CD8 ratio < 1 or being in the highest quintile of CD8+ senescent (28CD–/CD57+) T cells] individuals equally divided amongst the cohorts. Multivariable linear regression revealed a distinct IRP+ group. Age and dialysis status did not predict immune senescence in kidney transplant candidates. NK cell features alone could discriminate IRP– and IRP+ patients, suggesting that NK cells significantly contribute to the overall immune status in kidney transplant candidates and that a combined T and NK cell phenotyping can provide a more detailed IRP definition. ImmuKnow® value was negatively correlated to age and significantly lower in IRP+ patients and predicts IRP when used alone or in combination with NK cell features.

Conclusion: NK cells contribute to overall immune senescence in kidney transplant candidates.

Aging and the immune response to organ transplantation

An increasing number of older people receive organ transplants for various end-stage conditions. Although organ transplantation is an effective therapy for older patients (i.e., older than 65 years of age), such as in end-stage renal disease, this therapy has not been optimized for older patients because of our lack of understanding of the effect of aging and the immune response to organ transplantation. Here, we provide an overview of the impact of aging on both the allograft and the recipient and its effect on the immune response to organ transplantation. We describe what has been determined to date, discuss existing gaps in our knowledge, and make suggestions on necessary future studies to optimize organ transplantation for older people.

'I feel stronger and younger all the time'-perspectives of elderly kidney transplant recipients: thematic synthesis of qualitative research

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation offers improved survival and quality of life to an increasing number of elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, elderly kidney transplant recipients may face unique challenges due to a higher burden of comorbidity, greater cumulative risk of immunosuppression-related complications and increasing frailty. We aimed to describe the perspectives of elderly kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched to April 2015. Qualitative studies were eligible if they reported views from elderly kidney transplant recipients (≥60 years). Thematic synthesis was used to analyse the findings.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies involving >116 recipients were included. We identified seven themes. 'Regaining strength and vitality' meant valuing the physical and psychosocial improvements in daily functioning and life participation. 'Extending life' was the willingness to accept any organ, including extended criteria kidneys, to prolong survival. 'Debt of gratitude' entailed conscious appreciation toward their donor while knowing they were unable to repay their sacrifice. 'Moral responsibility to maintain health' motivated adherence to medication and lifestyle recommendations out of an ethical duty to protect their gift for graft survival. 'Unabating and worsening forgetfulness' hindered self-management. 'Disillusionment with side effects and complications' reflected disappointment and exasperation with the unintended consequences of medications. 'Finality of treatment option' was an acute awareness that the current transplant may be their last.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney transplantation was perceived to slow and even reverse the experience of aging among elderly recipients, especially compared with dialysis. However, some were frustrated over persistent limitations after transplant, struggled with the burden of medication side effects and worried about a possible return to dialysis if the transplant failed. Clarifying patient expectations of transplantation, providing support to alleviate the debilitating impacts of immunosuppression and addressing fears about deteriorating health and graft failure may improve satisfaction and outcomes in elderly kidney transplant recipients.

Immunosenescence and organ transplantation

Increasing numbers of elderly transplant recipients and a growing demand for organs from older donors impose pressing challenges on transplantation medicine. Continuous and complex modifications of the immune system in parallel to aging have a major impact on transplant outcome and organ quality. Both, altered alloimmune responses and increased immunogenicity of organs present risk factors for inferior patient and graft survival. Moreover, a growing body of knowledge on age-dependent modifications of allorecognition and alloimmune responses may require age-adapted immunosuppression and organ allocation. Here, we summarize relevant aspects of immunosenescence and their possible clinical impact on organ transplantation.

Aging augments IL-17 T-cell alloimmune responses

As increasing numbers of elderly patients require solid organ transplantation, the need to better understand how aging modifies alloimmune responses increases. Here, we examined whether aged mice exhibit augmented, donor-specific memory responses prior to transplantation. We found that elevated donor-specific IL-17, but not IFN-gamma, responses were observed in aged mice compared to young mice prior to transplantation. Further characterization of the heightened IL-17 alloimmune response with aging demonstrated that memory CD4(+) T cells were required. Reduced IL-2 alloimmune responses with age contributed to the elevated IL-17 phenotype in vitro, and treatment with an anti-IL-17 antibody delayed the onset of acute allograft rejection. In conclusion, aging leads to augmented, donor-specific IL-17 immune responses that are important for the timing of acute allograft rejection in aged recipients. IL-17 targeting therapies may be useful for averting transplant rejection responses in older transplant recipients.

Aging impairs recipient T cell intrinsic and extrinsic factors in response to transplantation

Background

As increasing numbers of older people are listed for solid organ transplantation, there is an urgent need to better understand how aging modifies alloimmune responses. Here, we investigated whether aging impairs the ability of donor dendritic cells or recipient immunity to prime alloimmune responses to organ transplantation.

Principal Findings

Using murine experimental models, we found that aging impaired the host environment to expand and activate antigen specific CD8⁺ T cells. Additionally, aging impaired the ability of polyclonal T cells to induce acute allograft rejection. However, the alloimmune priming capability of donor dendritic cells was preserved with aging.

Conclusion

Aging impairs recipient responses, both T cell intrinsic and extrinsic, in response to organ transplantation.

Lung transplantation in older patients?

OBJECTIVE

Age 65 years and older is generally considered a contraindication to lung transplantation. Our group has offered lung transplantation to select patients 65 years of age and older who lack other comorbid conditions. We sought to define the short- and medium-term outcome of lung transplantation in patients aged 65 years and older.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of our lung transplant recipients from March 2000 to September 2006. During this interval, 50 patients were 65 years or older at the time of transplantation. Fifty patients younger than 65 years were matched to the older cohort by means of propensity analysis. The demographics and perioperative and postoperative characteristics and survival of the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

Older patients were more likely to receive single-lung transplantation (older group: 76% vs younger group: 16%, P < .05) and nonstandard donor lungs (older group: 46% vs younger group: 28%, P = .06). The composite in-hospital morbidity rate was similar in the older and younger groups. There was no significant difference in the early oxygenation parameters, incidence of acute cellular rejection, or incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome between the 2 groups. The early survival of the older patients was 95.7% compared with 95.9% in the younger cohort (P = .73). The 1-year survival of the 2 groups was also similar (older group: 79.7% vs younger group: 91.2%, P = .16). The 3-year survival of the older and younger recipients was 73.6% and 74.2%, respectively (P = .64). There were 8 deaths in the older recipient group during the 1-month to 1-year posttransplantation interval, predominantly because of infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung transplantation can be performed in patients older than 65 years with acceptable clinical outcomes. The "increased" mortality of older patients between 1 month and 1 year after transplantation, predominantly from infectious causes, might be due to immunosenescence of older patients. This finding warrants adjustments in the immunosuppression protocol of older patients undergoing lung transplantation. The effect of offering lung transplantation to older patients on donor lung availability deserves further investigation.

Renal transplantation in elderly patients older than 70 years of age: results from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients (ages 70 yr and older) are among the fastest-growing group starting renal-replacement therapy in the United States. The outcomes of elderly patients who receive a kidney transplant have not been well studied compared with those of their peers on the waiting list.

METHODS

Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we analyzed data from 5667 elderly renal transplant candidates who initially were wait-listed from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2004. Of these candidates, 2078 received a deceased donor transplant, and 360 received a living donor transplant by 31 December 2005. Time-to-death was studied using Cox regression models with transplant as a time-dependent covariate. Mortality hazard ratios (RRs) of transplant versus waiting list were adjusted for recipient age, sex, race, ethnicity, blood type, panel reactive antibody, year of placement on the waiting list, dialysis modality, comorbidities, donation service area, and time from first dialysis to first placement on the waiting list.

RESULTS

Elderly transplant recipients had a 41% lower overall risk of death compared with wait-listed candidates (RR=0.59; P<0.0001). Recipients of nonstandard, that is, expanded criteria donor, kidneys also had a significantly lower mortality risk (RR=0.75; P<0.0001). Elderly patients with diabetes and those with hypertension as a cause of end-stage renal disease also experienced a large benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Transplantation offers a significant reduction in mortality compared with dialysis in the wait-listed elderly population with end-stage renal disease.

Renal transplantation: older recipients and donors

The majority of patients receiving a renal allograft, including a kidney from an older donor, do well. Renal transplantation from a living donor is associated with distinct advantages, including prolonged allograft survival. When live donors are not available, however, deceased donor kidneys provide suitable renal function that frequently lasts the lifetime of elderly recipients. Elderly patients who receive a kidney transplant enjoy improved survival, better quality of life, and lower medical costs than those who remain on dialysis.

How old is old for transplantation?

Elderly patients are the fastest growing group requiring renal transplantation. This study investigates whether transplantation is worthwhile in the elderly and whether there is evidence supporting an age limit for transplantation. One thousand ninety-five adults transplanted in Scotland between 1 January 1989 and 31 December 1999 were followed up to 11 years. Sociodemographic, comorbidity and transplant data were obtained from the national databases and patient's notes. Patient and graft survival, risk and causes of graft failure and patient death were compared between four age groups (18-49, 50-59, 60-64 and >65). All groups had similar gender, social deprivation and renal disease distribution. The incidence of comorbidity increased with age. The groups had comparable HLA matching, but patients aged 18-49 years received transplants from younger donors and with shorter cold ischaemic times. Younger patients had more acute rejection and less delayed graft function. Older patients had a higher incidence of death with functioning graft. Patients over 65 years had an almost dialysis-free remaining life, while the graft half-life was significantly shorter than patient half-life in the youngest group. Transplantation in elderly recipients is worthwhile despite a higher comorbidity. Careful selection rather than a fixed age limit should be used to ensure a satisfactory graft and patient survival.

Rejection and recipient age

In transplantation the risk of acute rejection decreases with recipient age. This is clearly illustrated in transplantation of a non-vascularised tissue, such as the cornea. In vascularised transplants, such as kidneys, acute rejection decreases with recipient age, but the phenomenon is obscured by the fact that chronic allograft nephropathy increases with age, and is further confounded by increased death from infectious disease and drug-related causes. The underlying cellular mechanisms responsible for this weakening of rejection are discussed, as is defective signal transduction leading to decreased activation of cells and decreased resistance to immunosuppressive drugs. This supports a view that less intensive immunosuppressive drug therapy is desirable in elderly recipients. Although pharmacokinetic studies are documented, there are no routine assays to measure efficacy of these drugs in individual patients. In summary, the decline in acute rejection with increasing recipient age may be due both to immunosenescence and decreased resistance to immunosuppressive drugs. Future assays to test these mechanisms could be used to tailor therapy to individual needs.

Immunosuppression in elderly renal transplant recipients: are current regimens too aggressive?

Renal transplantation is an accepted and successful treatment modality in elderly patients with end-stage renal disease. In comparison with maintenance dialysis, transplantation has been shown to confer a mortality benefit as well as improvements in quality of life in older individuals with end-stage renal disease. Despite this, overall outcomes of renal transplantation in elderly individuals have, in general, been less successful than those of younger renal transplant recipients. Largely, this has been due to the particular vulnerability of elderly patients to the immunosuppressive medications used in renal transplantation. This review article covers these issues in some detail and briefly discusses some of the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, physiological and immunological differences between younger and older transplant recipients. Elderly renal transplant recipients have both a higher rate of patient death and allograft loss censored for death. Upon multivariate analysis, age of the recipient is strongly associated with allograft loss independent of other known factors. Acute rejections are less frequent in older individuals; however the consequence of a rejection if it occurs is negative for long-term graft survival. On the other hand, death by infection is vastly increased in older versus younger renal transplant recipients. In general, the pharmacokinetics of the immunosuppressive agents are little affected by age, but the tolerance to these agents seems to decrease with increasing age. Elderly renal transplant recipients present a very difficult clinical challenge. As the elderly become an ever-increasing segment of the renal transplant population, new and innovative immunosuppressive strategies will have to be considered and applied.

Renal transplantation in patients above 60 years of age in the modern era: a single center experience with a review of the literature

A retrospective study was conducted of 797 patients receiving renal transplants from January 1985 to March 1997. Patient and graft survival was compared for patients above and below the age of 60. Sixty-nine patients < or =60 years old received 73 kidneys. Race: 73% Caucasian, 26% Black, 1% Other. Sex: 68% M. Hypertension (19) and PCKD (15) were the most common diagnoses. Mean peak panel reactive antibody (PRA) was 37.7%. Donor age was 2 to 66 years. Mean Cold ischemic time was 28.1 hours. Follow-up was until death or until 8/30/97. Patients <60 years included: 62% Caucasian, 34% Black, 4% Other; 60% male, Mean PRA 39.3. Of the 69 study patients, 27 died: 19 with a functioning graft, 8 within one year of transplantation. Cardiovascular causes (19 patients, 72%) and infection (7 patients, 24%) were most common. Common causes of graft loss were death with a functioning graft (19) and chronic rejection (15); other causes were acute rejection and primary non-function. Univariate analysis of 18 risk factors showed CHF and past history of vascular surgery significantly (p < 0.05) affected time of return to dialysis. Multi variate analysis did not show these independent variables to be significant. Abnormal ejection fraction and presence of q waves on EKG significantly affected time to death (p < 0.05) on uni- and multi-variate analysis. After censoring patients that died with functioning grafts, difference in graft survival between > or =60 and <59 years was not significant (p > 0.2). In this study, 68% of older patients had allografts functioning at 1 year. The fact that older patients succumb over time from natural causes should not keep patients from transplantation. Immunosuppressive agents need to be limited to reduce the incidence of infection. Criteria need to be refined to define those who are at prohibitive risk, who may not be candidates for transplantation.

Renal transplantation in the elderly

Recent data show that, despite a long period during which few elderly patients in end-stage renal failure received grafts, there are neither medical nor ethical grounds for avoiding kidney transplantation, at least in those aged under 70 or even 75 years of age. Units in which transplantation in older recipients is routine show a good survival of recipients, and comparable survival of grafts to those placed in younger recipients. This equality of graft survival with age arises because, although death with a functioning graft is more common in the elderly (principally from cardiovascular disease and infections, with malignant diseases becoming more important with time), graft losses from rejection are lower, and so overall outcomes are similar. Long-term patient survival is better, quality of life is improved and treatment is cheaper than in comparable elderly patients maintained on hemodialysis or chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. In terms of allocation to older recipients, this success presents major practical and ethical difficulties given the shortage of cadaver organs. Data do not support the idea of 'age-matching' older or marginal kidneys to older recipients: like their younger counterparts, older recipients do better with organs from younger donors. Living donors can be used successfully even in those over 70, and elderly living donors have a place in the treatment of the elderly. The optimum immunosuppressive regimes for elderly recipients have not been determined, given their poorer immune responsiveness and lower rejection rates compared with younger individuals.

Renal function and renal disease in the elderly: Part II

In all industrialized countries, life expectancy has risen in the past 100 years. The incidence of elderly patients reaching end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and requiring renal replacement therapy has also increased. During the past few decades, the pattern of ESRD has changed significantly with the emerging predominance of elderly patients. The causes of this phenomenon are manifold and include an increasing number of chronic diseases typical of the 'third age', such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and vascular disease. In many species, a consequence of aging includes deterioration of renal function, partly due to structural alterations, and partly as the result of a diminishing blood flow. In humans, the aging kidney is characterized by modifications resulting from organic and functional disturbances. In particular, type 2 diabetes mellitus has emerged as an important condition, the microvascular and macrovascular complications of which are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in older patients. In Part II of this review, the specific aspects of renal replacement therapy in the elderly will be discussed.

Renal transplantation in the elderly: a long-term, single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal failure increases with advancing age and renal transplantation should be considered in end-stage renal failure patients older than 60 years. However, there is a paucity of data on long-term patient and graft survival in this population.

METHODS

From October 1983 to March 1999, 310 renal transplantations were performed at Geneva University Hospital in 283 patients, of which 49 were done in 48 patients older than 60 years (mean age 65.6+/-4.1 years). The following data were analysed at 1, 5, and 10 years, and compared between the patients >60 years and <60 years old: actuarial patient and graft survival, serum creatinine, causes of graft loss, and patient death.

RESULTS

Patient survival at 10 years was 81% for patients <60 years and 44% for patients >60 years. Graft survival at 10 years was 59% for patients <60 years and 32% for patients >60 years. Graft survival at 10 years censored for death with functioning graft was 65% for patients <60 years and 81% for patients >60 years. Main causes of mortality in the older patients were related to cardiovascular events (47%), neoplasia (41%), and sepsis (18%). Overall, recipient and donor age were not predictive factors for graft survival, as shown by multiple logistic regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal transplantation should be considered in patients older than 60 years, since graft survival is excellent in this population. Although these patients have a shorter life expectancy, they benefit from renal transplantation similarly to younger kidney transplant recipients.

Long-term results of liver transplantation in older patients 60 years of age and older

BACKGROUND

Advances in perioperative care and immunosuppression have enabled clinicians to broaden the indications for organ transplantation. Advanced age is no longer considered a contraindication to transplantation at most centers. Although short-term studies of elderly liver transplant recipients have demonstrated that the incidence of complications and overall patient survival are similar to those of younger adults, transplant center-specific, long-term data are not available.

METHODS

From August of 1984 to September of 1997, 91 patients 60 years of age or older received primary liver transplants at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. This group of patients was compared with a group of younger adults (n=387) ranging in age from 18 to 59 years who received primary liver transplants during the same period. The most common indications for transplantation in both groups were Laennec's cirrhosis, hepatitis C, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and cryptogenic cirrhosis. There was no difference in the preoperative severity of illness between the groups. Results. The length of hospitalization was the same for both groups, and there were no significant differences in the incidence of rejection, infection (surgical or opportunistic), repeat operation, readmission, or repeat transplantation between the groups. The only significant difference identified between the groups was long-term survival. Five-year patient survival was 52% in the older group and 75% in the younger group (P<0.05). Ten-year patient survival was 35% in the older group and 60% in the younger group (P<0.05). The most common cause of late mortality in elderly liver recipients was malignancy (35.0%), whereas most of the young adult deaths were the result of infectious complications (24.2%).

CONCLUSION

Although older recipients at this center did as well as younger recipients in the early years after liver transplantation, long-term survival results were not as encouraging.

A comparison of the effects of dialysis and renal transplantation on the survival of older uremic patients

BACKGROUND

Patients over age 60 constitute half of all new patients accepted into the renal replacement therapy programs in Australia. However, the optimal treatment of their end-stage renal disease remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to compare survival for dialysis and renal transplantation in older patients who were rigorously screened and considered eligible for transplantation.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 174 consecutive patients over 60 who were accepted on to the Queensland cadaveric renal transplant waiting list between January 1, 1993 and December 31, 1997. Follow-up was terminated on October 1, 1998. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-transplant basis using a Cox regression model with time-varying explanatory variables. An alternative survival analysis was also performed, in which patients no longer considered suitable for transplantation were censored at the time of their removal from the waiting list.

RESULTS

There were 67 patients receiving a renal transplant, whereas the other 107 continued to undergo dialysis. These two groups were well matched at baseline with respect to age, gender, body mass index, renal disease etiology, comorbid illnesses, and dialysis duration and modality. The overall mortality rate was 0.096 per patient-year (0.131 for dialysis and 0.029 for transplant, P<0.001). Respective 1-, 3- and 5-year survivals were 92%, 62%, and 27% for the dialysis group and 98%, 95%, and 90% (P<0.01) for the transplant group. Patients in the transplant group had an adjusted hazard ratio 0.16 times that of the dialysis group (95% confidence interval 0.06-0.42). If patients were censored at the time of their withdrawal from the transplant waiting list, the adjusted hazard ratio was 0.24 (95% confidence interval 0.09-0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Renal transplantation seems to confer a substantial survival advantage over dialysis in patients with end-stage renal failure who are rigorously screened and considered suitable for renal transplantation.

Infectious complications in geriatric renal transplant patients: comparison of two immunosuppressive protocols

BACKGROUND

It has been well documented that a regimen of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine (CsA), and prednisone (Pred) reduces the incidence of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients, as compared with previous regimens based on azathioprine (AZA), CsA, and Pred. In the general renal transplant patient population, immunosuppressive regimens that include MMF are usually well tolerated. It is not clear whether this holds true for older transplant recipients, who may be more susceptible to complications from the greater immunosuppression conferred by MMF.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed our geriatric renal transplant population (age >60 years, 1990-1998) and compared a cohort of 46 patients treated with AZA, Pred, and CsA to a cohort of 45 patients treated with MMF, Pred, and CsA.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to pretransplantation demographics. Patient and graft survival during the first year was not significantly different between the groups. During the first year of follow-up, we observed 27 infections requiring hospitalization in 15 patients in the MMF-treated group as compared with 10 infections in 7 patients in the AZA-treated group. A Cox proportional hazard model accounting for the above mentioned covariates isolated MMF versus AZA as a significant risk factor for the occurrence of serious infectious events (all: P<0.01; cytomegalovirus, fungal: P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that an immunosuppressive regimen of MMF, CsA, and Pred seems to be correlated with an increased incidence of infectious adverse events as compared with AZA, CsA, and Pred in elderly patients.

Cyclosporin pharmacokinetics in the elderly

Cyclosporin is an immunosuppressant used in organ transplantation and selected autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. In both these indications, the elderly represent an important and growing segment of the patient population. Cyclosporin is primarily eliminated via biotransformation by cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A in the gut wall and liver. Additionally, P-glycoprotein (mdr-1) located in the gastrointestinal epithelium can affect affect blood drug concentrations after oral administration of cyclosporin, presumably by counter-transporting the drug from the systemic circulation back into the gastrointestinal lumen. Theoretically, age-related alterations in either of these pathways could affect cyclosporin disposition in the elderly. These general pharmacological considerations together with the narrow therapeutic index of cyclosporin between minimally immunosuppressive concentrations and those associated with adverse events, underscore the need for dedicated pharmacokinetic studies in the elderly. Single dose studies have demonstrated that cyclosporin pharmacokinetics are not different in healthy elderly individuals compared with healthy young adults, nor is the between-subject variability in pharmacokinetic parameters more heterogenous in healthy elderly individuals. Similarly, there were no apparent differences in cyclosporin disposition in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with healthy young and elderly individuals. Whether pharmacokinetic variability may be increased in elderly patients has not been rigorously addressed and requires investigation in a larger patient population for a definitive conclusion. A population pharmacokinetic study of cyclosporin in organ transplant patients, including elderly allograft recipients up to 75 years of age, did not identify age as a covariable influencing cyclosporin pharmacokinetics. Hence, the available pharmacokinetic data in the elderly do not reveal any major differences from the disposition characterised in younger individuals. It is generally recognised that the elderly are more prone to drug-related adverse experiences and are at greater risk for drug-drug interactions secondary to polypharmacy. The former factor may underlie, in part, the increased incidence of renal adverse events reported in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 65 years of age receiving cyclosporin. Clinical experience with cyclosporin in elderly organ transplant recipients has not revealed a tolerability profile remarkably different from those in younger patients. Polypharmacy may have specific relevance for elderly patients treated with cyclosporin since this agent is a substrate of both CYP3A and P-glycoprotein, both of which are important in the elimination of many commonly used drugs. This implies that the clinician prescribing cyclosporin for an elderly patient must exercise a heightened awareness for potential drug-drug interactions which could affect the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin. Based on the available cyclosporin pharmacokinetic data in adults, no age-related administration adaptations appear necessary for its use in the elderly.

Outcome of kidney transplantation under tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in elderly patients

Kidney transplantation has become a reasonable treatment option for selected patients aged 60 years or older, and a number of different immunosuppressive drug protocols have been described. This article concerns 230 recipients who were aged 60 years or older and who were undergoing kidney-only transplantation at the University of Pittsburgh between January 1990 and April 1997. All recipients were treated with a tacrolimus-based immunosuppression regimen. The median follow-up was 31.5 months (range, 1-86). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial patient survival rates were 90%, 83%, and 76%, respectively. There were 42 (19%) deaths, cardiovascular disease (50%) and infection (38%) being the main causes. Death with a functioning kidney occurred in 28 (67%) patients. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial graft survival rates were 84%, 74%, and 64%, respectively. The delayed graft function rate was 33%. Rejection was seen in 57 (25%) elderly patients. The mean serum creatinine was 2.6 +/- 2.7 mg/dL and the serum urea nitrogen was 35 +/- 22 mg/dL. The mean tacrolimus level was 8.5 +/- 3.8 ng/mL. These results suggest that renal transplantation in older recipients under tacrolimus-based immunosuppression is associated with reasonable outcomes, and can be offered to appropriately selected patients.

Renal transplantation for patients 60 years of older. A single-institution experience

OBJECTIVE

The authors reviewed renal transplant outcomes in recipients 60 years of age or older.

BACKGROUND

Before cyclosporine, patients older than 45 years of age were considered to be at high risk for transplantation. With cyclosporine, the age limits for transplantation have expanded.

METHODS

The authors compared patient and graft survival, hospital stay, the incidence of rejection and rehospitalization, and the cause of graft loss for primary kidney recipients 60 years of age or older versus those 18 to 59 years of age. For those patients > or = 60 years transplanted since 1985, the authors analyzed pretransplant extrarenal disease and its impact on post-transplant outcome. In addition, all surviving recipients > or = 60 years completed a medical outcome survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

Patient and graft survival for those > or = 60 years of age versus those 18 to 59 years of age were similar 3 years after transplant. Subsequently, mortality increased for the older recipients. Death-censored graft survival was identical in the two groups. There were no differences in the cause of graft loss. Those 60 years of age or older had a longer initial hospitalization, but had fewer rejection episodes and fewer rehospitalizations. Quality of life for recipients 60 years of age or older was similar to the age-matched U.S. population.

CONCLUSION

Renal transplantation is successful for recipients 60 years of age or older. Most of them had extrarenal disease at the time of transplantation; however, extrarenal disease was not an important predictor of outcome and should not be used as an exclusion criterion. Post-transplant quality of life is excellent.

Renal replacement therapies in the elderly: Part II. Renal transplantation

The United States end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population is growing progressively older. As a percentage of the overall ESRD population, the number of patients 65 years of age and older approached 40% by 1989. However, the percentage of ESRD patients with a functioning transplant was only 2.7% in this age group. Success of transplantation in geriatric ESRD patients over the last decade is due to improved patient selection as well as the use of cyclosporine A and lower doses of corticosteroids, with the achievement of 1-year patient and graft survival rates of 85% and 75%, respectively. For patients older than 60 or 65 years, the 5-year "functional" graft survival is 55% to 60%. Although overall results are excellent, the management of transplantation in the elderly requires an understanding of pharmacology, immunology, and physiology peculiar to this age group. Since the elderly have a degree of immune incompetence, they require less aggressive immunotherapy. Elderly patients have decreased hepatic enzyme activity, especially the P450 system, and therefore require a lower cyclosporine dose. Although elderly patients experience less rejection episodes than younger patients, graft loss in the elderly transplant recipient is due mainly to patient death. Most common causes of death in the elderly transplant recipient are cardiovascular disease and infection related to peaks of immunosuppression. Shortage of cadaver kidneys and limited life expectancy of the geriatric ESRD patient make allocation of cadaver kidneys to patients over 70 years (and even 65 years) a controversial issue and an ethical dilemma. Use of elderly cadaver donors (over 55 to 60 years) is associated with inferior success rates and is not an optimal solution to shortage of cadaver kidneys.

Cadaveric renal transplantation after 60 years of age. A single center experience

We report the outcome of 121 cadaveric renal transplants performed in our institution between September 1985 and April 1992 in 117 patients, aged 60-71 years (mean 63 years) at the time of transplantation. Compared to 640 patients 20-59 years of age transplanted during the same study period, a nonstatistically significant difference was observed in the 5-year actuarial patient (80% and 90%, respectively, in recipients over and under 60 years of age) and transplant (80% and 72%, respectively, in recipients over and under 60 years of age) survival rates. However, elderly patients had significantly lower survival than recipients 20-29 years of age (P < 0.009). Fourteen patients died (all but one with a functioning graft) due to cardiovascular diseases (5%; 42.8% of total deaths), infections (3%; 28.6% of total deaths), and gastrointestinal complications (3%; 28.6% of total deaths). Younger patients showed a similar and nonsignificantly different incidence of cardiovascular- (35%) and infectious-(30%) related deaths. The incidence of acute rejection episodes and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infectious episodes was 27% and 24%, respectively, during the 1st post-transplant year. Ongoing acute rejection and CMV infectious episodes were significantly higher in patients who died than in those still alive (P < 0.002 and P < 0.02, respectively). Cyclosporin maintenance therapy was well tolerated in all patients but one, and 64% of the patients could be maintained without steroids. These data indicate that cadaveric renal transplantation is a safe and effective procedure in the management of chronic renal failure of selected patients 60 years of age or older.

Futility and rationing

It seems more than coincidental that at a time of great concern over rising health care costs and fears of rampant technology, debates are suddenly taking place about medical futility and health care rationing. This article examines the economic, historical, and demographic factors that have motivated increased attention to both these concepts, explores differences and similarities in the meaning of these terms, and discusses their ethical implications. Specifically, we identify four common sources of current debates on futility and rationing: the rise in health care costs; the development of high-technology medicine; the aging of society; and the effort to limit the scope of patient autonomy. We propose that when rationing criteria refer to medical benefit, the meanings of futility and rationing share certain common features. Futility and rationing differ, however, in important ways. Futility refers to treatment and outcome relationships not in a general population but in a specific patient. Rationing criteria usually are supported by reference to theories of justice, whereas the definition of futility, if achieved, will probably be arrived at by empirical community agreement. Rationing always occurs against a backdrop of resource scarcity, but futility need not. Toward the end of the paper, we clarify how the various connotations and contexts we associate with each term enhance or frustrate ethical debate.