Effect of the maintenance immunosuppressive drug regimen on kidney transplant outcome

Long-term Prolonged-release Tacrolimus-based Immunosuppression in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: 5-Y Prospective Follow-up of Patients in the ADVANCE Study

Although prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T) is widely approved for posttransplantation immunosuppression in kidney recipients, large-scale studies are required to assess long-term outcomes. We present follow-up data from the Advagraf-based Immunosuppression Regimen Examining New Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Kidney Transplant Recipients (ADVANCE) trial, in which kidney transplant patients (KTPs) received corticosteroid minimization with PR-T.

Methods

ADVANCE was a 24-wk, randomized, open-label, phase-4 study. De novo KTPs received PR-T with basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil and were randomized to receive an intraoperative corticosteroid bolus plus tapered corticosteroids until day 10 (arm 1) or an intraoperative corticosteroid bolus (arm 2). In this 5-y, noninterventional follow-up, patients received maintenance immunosuppression according to standard practice. The primary endpoint was graft survival (Kaplan-Meier). Secondary endpoints included patient survival, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection-free survival, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (4-variable modification of diet in renal disease).

Results

Follow-up study included 1125 patients. Overall graft survival at 1 and 5 y posttransplantation was 93.8% and 88.1%, respectively, and was similar between treatment arms. At 1 and 5 y, patient survival was 97.8% and 94.4%, respectively. Five-year graft and patient survival rates in KTPs who remained on PR-T were 91.5% and 98.2%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated similar risk of graft loss and death between treatment arms. Five-year biopsy-confirmed acute rejection-free survival was 84.1%. Mean ± standard deviation values of estimated glomerular filtration rate were 52.7 ± 19.5 and 51.1 ± 22.4 mL/min/1.73 m² at 1 and 5 y, respectively. Fifty adverse drug reactions were recorded, probably tacrolimus-related in 12 patients (1.5%).

Conclusions

Graft survival and patient survival (overall and for KTPs who remained on PR-T) were numerically high and similar between treatment arms at 5 y posttransplantation.

Recent Advances in Liposomal-Based Anti-Inflammatory Therapy

Liposomes can be seen as ideal carriers for anti-inflammatory drugs as their ability to (passively) target sites of inflammation and release their content to inflammatory target cells enables them to increase local efficacy with only limited systemic exposure and adverse effects. Nonetheless, few liposomal formulations seem to reach the clinic. The current review provides an overview of the more recent innovations in liposomal treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, vascular inflammation, and transplantation. Cutting edge developments include the liposomal delivery of gene and RNA therapeutics and the use of hybrid systems where several liposomal bilayer features, or several drugs, are combined in a single formulation. The majority of the articles reviewed here focus on preclinical animal studies where proof-of-principle of an improved efficacy-safety ratio is observed when using liposomal formulations. A few clinical studies are included as well, which brings us to a discussion about the challenges of clinical translation of liposomal nanomedicines in the field of inflammatory diseases.

A Short History of Skin Grafting in Burns: From the Gold Standard of Autologous Skin Grafting to the Possibilities of Allogeneic Skin Grafting with Immunomodulatory Approaches

Due to groundbreaking and pioneering developments in the last century, significant improvements in the care of burn patients have been achieved. In addition to the still valid therapeutic standard of autologous split-thickness skin grafting, various commercially available skin substitutes are currently available. Significant progress in the field of tissue engineering has led to the development of promising therapeutic approaches. However, scientific advances in the field of allografting and transplant immunology are of great importance. The achievement of various milestones over the past decades has provided thought-provoking impulses in the field of skin allotransplantation. Thus, biologically viable skin allotransplantation is still not a part of the clinical routine. The purpose of this article is to review the achievements in burn surgery with regards to skin allotransplantation in recent years.

Ten-year observational follow-up of a randomized trial comparing cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy combined with steroid withdrawal in living-donor renal transplantation

Although various strategies for steroid withdrawal after transplantation have been attempted, there are few reports of the long-term results of steroid withdrawal regimens in kidney transplantation. Earlier, we reported on a 5-year prospective, randomized, single-center trial comparing the safety and efficacy of cyclosporine (CsA) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with that of tacrolimus (TAC) plus MMF, when steroids were withdrawn 6 months after kidney transplantation in low-risk patients. We now report the 10-year observational data on the study population. We collected data from the database of the Organ Transplantation Center, Samsung Medical Center for 5 years after completion of the original study (TAC group n = 62; CsA group n = 55). The 10-year patient survival, death-censored graft survival, and acute rejection-free survival did not differ between groups (98% vs 96%; P = 0.49, 78% vs 85%; P = 0.75 and 84% vs 76%; P = 0.14 in the TAC group vs CsA group, respectively). In low-risk patients, there was no difference in long-term patient and graft survival between TAC- and CsA-based late steroid withdrawal regimens that included MMF treatment. More long-term randomized clinical trials are needed to clarify the benefits of late steroid withdrawal in kidney transplantation.

Outcomes Associated with Steroid Avoidance and Alemtuzumab among Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Alemtuzumab is a humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody used as induction in kidney transplantation (KTX) since 2003. Few studies have evaluated long-term outcomes of this agent or changes in outcomes over time.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

A retrospective cohort study was performed examining United States registry data from 2003 to 2014 of primary KTX recipients receiving induction with alemtuzumab (AZ; n=5521) or antithymocyte globulin (ATG; n=8504) and maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil and early withdrawal of steroids. The primary outcome was overall death-censored graft survival (DCGS), and secondary outcomes were overall patient survival and 1-year acute rejection. Multivariate models were fit with donor, recipient, and transplant covariates. Because poorer outcomes with AZ may occur from a learning curve impact with the use of a new medication, transplant year was categorized into three time periods to evaluate outcomes over time (2003-2005, 2006-2008, ≥2009), and an interaction term of induction type with transplant year category was included in all models to test for era impacts.

RESULTS

On multivariate analysis of DCGS there was a significant interaction between AZ and era (P<0.001). AZ was significantly associated with inferior DCGS in the earliest 2003-2005 era (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.21; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.72 to 2.84) but not in the middle 2006-2008 era (aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.36) or the most recent 2009-2014 era (aHR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.29) compared with ATG. Risk-adjusted patient survival (aHR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.61; aHR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.46; and aHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.29 by era, respectively) and acute rejection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.17; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.42; aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.07; aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.98 by era, respectively) with AZ was comparable with ATG in the most recent era; however, there was no significant interaction with time (P=0.13 and P=0.06, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Current alemtuzumab utilization is associated with comparable graft and patient survival and acute rejection compared with ATG. Graft survival with alemtuzumab has improved over time.

Current trends in immunosuppressive therapies for renal transplant recipients

PURPOSE

Current trends in immunosuppressive therapies for renal transplant recipients are reviewed.

SUMMARY

The common premise for immunosuppressive therapies in renal transplantation is to use multiple agents to work on different immunologic targets. The use of a multidrug regimen allows for pharmacologic activity at several key steps in the T-cell replication process and lower dosages of each individual agent, thereby producing fewer drug-related toxicities. In general, there are three stages of clinical immunosuppression: induction therapy, maintenance therapy, and treatment of an established acute rejection episode. Only immunosuppressive therapies used for maintenance therapy are discussed in detail in this review. The most common maintenance immunosuppressive agents can be divided into five classes: (1) the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) (cyclosporine and tacrolimus), (2) costimulation blockers (belatacept), (3) mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus), (4) antiproliferatives (azathioprine and mycophenolic acid derivatives), and (5) corticosteroids. Immunosuppressive regimens vary among transplantation centers but most often include a CNI and an adjuvant agent, with or without corticosteroids. Selection of appropriate immunosuppressive regimens should be patient specific, taking into account the medications' pharmacologic properties, adverse-event profile, and potential drug-drug interactions, as well as the patient's preexisting diseases, risk of rejection, and medication regimen.

CONCLUSION

Advancements in transplant immunosuppression have resulted in a significant reduction in acute cellular rejection and a modest increase in long-term patient and graft survival. Because the optimal immunosuppression regimen is still unknown, immunosuppressant use should be influenced by institutional preference and tailored to the immunologic risk of the patient and adverse-effect profile of the drug.

Effect of corticosteroid withdrawal on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil exposure in a randomized multicenter study

As corticosteroid-sparing protocols are increasingly utilized in kidney transplant recipients, it is crucial to understand potential drug interactions between tacrolimus (TAC) and the effect of corticosteroid withdrawal as well as to characterize dose adjustments of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in this setting. This prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study included 397 patients who were randomized on posttransplant day 8 to receive either placebo (CSWD) or corticosteroid continuance (CCS). TAC trough levels at week two posttransplant were significantly greater in the CSWD group whereas TAC doses were comparable to the CCS group. This interaction was not observed in the African American subgroup. Higher serum creatinine and potassium levels were also observed in the CSWD group. MMF dose was significantly reduced in the CSWD group by the investigators because of decreased WBC counts, mostly outside of study protocol criteria, despite similar incidence of neutropenia and reported cytomegalovirus infection. Understanding TAC and MMF exposure in the context of corticosteroid-sparing protocols should allow for improved dosing of immunosuppressants and better management of posttransplant patients.

Steroids in kidney transplant patients

Any evaluation of steroids in kidney transplantation is hampered by individual variability in metabolism, the lack of clinically available steroid blood levels, and overall little attention to steroid exposure. Many feel that steroids were an essential part of chronic immunosuppression in past decades but may no longer be necessary in low-risk populations when our newer and more potent drugs are used. Potential differences in long-term outcome will be unapparent in short-term antibody induction studies in low-risk patients, particularly with low on steroid doses, as may have happened in the recent, well-done Astellas trial. In many studies, the evidence for the superiority of mycophenolate (MMF) and tacrolimus (TAC) was not as strong as the evidence for the benefit of steroids in the Canadian cyclosporine study. As the practice of steroid withdrawal has increased, we have not seen the improvement in long-term graft survival that many expected with our newer agents. Steroids have immunosuppressive effects even in doses that are low by historic standards, and side effects may not justify their abandonment.

Steroid avoidance or withdrawal after renal transplantation increases the risk of acute rejection but decreases cardiovascular risk. A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The morbidity related to long-term steroid therapy has led to continued interest in withdrawal of steroids from immunosuppressant regimens after renal transplantation. A number of recent trials have provided long-term information regarding the risks and benefits of steroid avoidance or withdrawal (SAW).

METHODS

A literature search was performed using Ovid Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the Transplant Library. Randomized controlled trials comparing a maintenance steroid group with complete avoidance or withdrawal of steroids were selected. All studies were assessed for methodological quality. Trials were pooled by meta-analysis to provide summary effects (relative risk [RR] or weighted mean difference) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies including 5,637 patients met the inclusion criteria. SAW regimens significantly increased the risk of acute rejection (AR) over maintenance steroids (RR 1.56, CI 1.31-1.87, P<0.0001). No significant differences in corticosteroid resistant AR, patient survival, or graft survival were observed. Serum creatinine was increased and creatinine clearance was reduced with SAW. Cardiovascular risk factors including incidence of hypertension (RR 0.90, CI 0.85-0.94, P<0.0001), new onset diabetes (RR 0.64, CI 0.50-0.83, P=0.0006), and hypercholesterolemia (RR 0.76, CI 0.67-0.87, P<0.0001) were reduced significantly by SAW.

CONCLUSION

Despite an increase in the risk of AR with SAW protocols, there is only a small effect on graft function with no measurable effect on graft or patient survival. There are significant benefits in cardiovascular risk profiles after SAW. SAW protocols would seem justified with current immunosuppressive protocols in low-risk recipients.

Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Steroid-sparing strategies have been attempted during the last two decades in order to avoid morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. Previous systematic reviews of steroid withdrawal after kidney transplantation have shown significant increases in acute rejection and an increase in graft failure rates. Steroid avoidance in kidney transplantation is increasingly attempted and the possible benefits or harms have never been a subject of a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of steroid withdrawal or avoidance in patients receiving a kidney transplant.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE, references lists and abstracts from international transplantation society scientific meetings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies (RCTs) of steroid avoidance or withdrawal were included providing that one treatment arm consisted in steroid avoidance or withdrawal and intention-to-treat rates of acute rejection and graft failure were clearly established after steroid avoidance or use or withdrawal or continuation. Observational studies were tabulated.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 30 RCTs (5949 participants). Steroid-sparing strategies showed no effect on mortality or graft loss including death. Patients on any steroid-sparing strategy showed a higher risk of graft loss excluding death than those with conventional steroid use (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.52), especially in those not receiving MMF/Myf or everolimus (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.90). Acute rejection was more frequent with a steroid-sparing strategy (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.40) and more frequent after steroid withdrawal or avoidance when compared with standard steroid treatment when cyclosporin (CsA) was used. Steroid-sparing and withdrawal strategies showed benefits in reducing antihypertensive drug need, serum cholesterol, antihyperlipidaemic drug need, new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) requiring any treatment and cataracts. Steroid avoidance did not alter serum cholesterol, but was associated with less frequent NODAT requiring any treatment. Cardiovascular events were reduced with steroid avoidance. Reduced antihypertensive drug need and serum cholesterol were similar with CsA or tacrolimus (TAC). Reduced antihyperlipidaemic drug need was only evident with TAC, whereas the reduction in NODAT requiring any treatment was only evident with CsA. Infection was lower in steroid-sparing patients using CsA (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.00). NODAT requiring any treatment was less frequent with steroid avoidance than with steroid withdrawal.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review confirms that steroid avoidance and steroid withdrawal strategies in kidney transplantation are not associated with increased mortality or graft loss despite an increase in acute rejection. These immunosuppression strategies may allow safe steroid avoidance or elimination a few days after kidney transplantation if antibody induction treatment is prescribed or after three to six months if such induction is not used.

Corticosteroid reduction with tacrolimus (CORRETA) TRIAL: a prospective Brazilian multicenter, randomized trial of early corticosteroid reduction versus regular corticosteroid dosage maintenance on a tacrolimus (Prograf) and mycophenolate mofetil (Cellcept) immunosuppression regimen in kidney transplant recipients: interim analysis

Corticosteroids are a cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation despite their side effects and morbidity. Newer immunosuppressive agents may be more effective to allow corticosteroid sparing. An interim analysis of 60 completed out of 100 planned primary kidney transplant recipients is presented. All patients on tacrolimus (Prograf) and MMF (Cellcept) were randomized into two groups following a 1:1 distribution for early steroid reduction at posttransplant day 7 (G1; n = 31) versus to long-term maintenance steroids (G2; n = 29). Primary efficacy endpoints were composite endpoint of death, graft loss, or severe acute rejection at 6 and 12 months follow-up. Safety evaluation included severity and frequency of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, leukopenia, infection, malignancy, and severe adverse events. Mean age was 39.1 years, with 45.0% males and 66.7% Caucasians. African-Americans were 25.8% in G1 and 27.6% in G2. One death occurred in each group, as well as one case of severe (Banff III) rejection in G1 (P = 1.00). The incidence of rejection episodes between groups was not significant, namely, 41.9% in G1 and 20.7% in G2 (P = .077). There were no differences between groups concerning mean, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, HbA1c, or creatinine at 12 months. This interim analysis showed no evidence of an increased risk of poorer performance among the early steroid reduction or safety differences in kidney transplant recipients versus a regular dosage steroid group of patients. Further analysis of the complete study data is underway.

Long-Term Cell Monitoring of Kidney Recipients After an Antilymphocyte Globulin Induction With and Without Steroids

BACKGROUND

Because of several side effects, the corticosteroid usage has been minimized in kidney transplantation. The increased acute rejection episodes associated with their withdrawal may counterbalance with induction treatment using polyclonal antilymphocyte globulin (ALG). The effects of ALG on blood cell phenotype have already been the subject of several reports. However, to date, no data are available concerning the comparison of blood phenotype when ALG is given with or without steroids and no gene profiling study has been performed.

METHODS

We report here on a longitudinal blood cell analysis of a selected cohort of kidney recipients enrolled in a randomized study of steroid avoidance or withdrawal (during 6 months) during ALG induction.

RESULTS

In the two groups, ALG quickly and massively depleted all the T cells and natural killer cells, but not B cells. Interestingly, the lymphopenia-driven homeostatic proliferation of CD4 and CD8T cells strongly differed with persistent low CD4 (including CD25CD4) T-cell counts. Effector memory CD8T cells reappeared rapidly. ALG induced apoptosis-associated molecules and increased myeloid cell genes. However, few genes were found differentially expressed with a low fold ratio between the two groups during and at distance of corticotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Thus initial steroid avoidance or withdrawal associated with ALG induction has a weak influence on phenotype and transcriptional pattern of blood leukocytes. In contrast, ALG therapy induces an early and strong depletion of all T-cell subsets with contrasted long-lasting homeostatic regulation.

Steroid Sparing in Kidney Transplantation: Changing Paradigms, Improving Outcomes, and Remaining Questions

The widely known adverse effects of long-term therapy with corticosteroids have motivated increasing interest in steroid-free immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients. Results from recent trials that used newer immunosuppressants to facilitate elimination of steroids suggest better short-term results than were achieved in an earlier era. However, the best results have been reported in uncontrolled trials of low-risk patients or in randomized trials with relatively short periods of follow-up. Increasingly, the therapeutic paradigm has shifted from late withdrawal of steroids to very early withdrawal after transplantation or even complete avoidance. Induction antibody therapy has been used routinely in the most successful trials that involved early steroid withdrawal or avoidance. Although the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients who are treated with steroid-free immunosuppression are improving steadily, there still is room for concern in recommending this strategy as a standard of practice.

Agreement of immunosuppression regimens described in Medicare pharmacy claims with the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network survey

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) collects intermittent survey data on immunosuppressive medication use that are studied frequently as research measures. Pharmacy billing claims may provide an accurate measure of immunosuppression use over time. Herein is characterized the agreement of Medicare pharmacy claims for immunosuppressive medications with OPTN reports. Data were drawn from the United States Renal Data System. Participants received a kidney transplant in 2000 to 2001 and had an OPTN record and a Medicare pharmacy claim for an immunosuppressive drug at transplant discharge and 6 mo and 1 yr after transplantation. The concordance (kappa) of the OPTN and claims (+/-30 d of survey) for indicated medication use was compared, and sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for claims were computed, assuming OPTN as a "gold standard." Clinical trial participation and regimen changes were examined as explanations for discordance. A total of 4357 eligible subjects were identified. Concordance over observation ranged from excellent for calcineurin inhibitors (kappa > 0.86) to generally very good for adjunctive agents (kappa = 0.49 to 0.75) to poor for corticosteroids (kappa <0.15). Claims demonstrated high positive predictive values (> or =97%) but low negative predictive values (< or =13%) for OPTN-reported corticosteroid use. Regimen changes (28 to 75%) but not clinical trial participation (< or =21%) were identified frequently among cases with discordant indications of nonsteroid medication use. Close agreement of Medicare billing claims and the OPTN for indicated use of nonsteroid immunosuppressive medications supports both as useful measures of drug exposure. Low detection rates of OPTN-indicated corticosteroid use within claims require further examination.

Steroid withdrawal in living donor renal transplant recipients using tacrolimus and cyclosporine: a randomized prospective study*

Steroids have been a mainstay of immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation despite their adverse effects. The introduction of new immunosuppressant has improved the survival rates and prompted trials of steroid withdrawal. We conducted a randomized prospective study to compare steroid withdrawal at 6 months post-transplant between tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (FK group) versus cyclosporine A + MMF (CsA group). Steroid was withdrawn at 6 months post-transplant under the condition of no rejection episode proven by biopsy and maintenance of serum creatinine level <2.0 mg/dl. Fourteen recipients were excluded because of acute rejection within 6 months or protocol violation. Steroid could be tapered off in 62 in FK group and 55 in CsA. Three cases in FK group and five in CsA had acute rejection within another 6 months after steroid withdrawal (P > 0.05). At 12 months, the incidence of post-transplant diabetes was 18.6% vs. 8.0% in FK and CsA group. And hypercholesterolemia was presented in 8.5% vs. 2.0%, hypertension in 47.5% vs. 56.0%, and serum creatinine level 1.18 +/- 0.24 mg/dl vs. 1.18 +/- 0.20 mg/dl, respectively (P > 0.05). Steroid withdrawal may be carried out successfully using both FK and CsA with MMF, but long-term follow-up is necessary.

Recipient age and mycophenolate mofetil as the main determinants of outcome after steroid withdrawal: analysis of long-term follow-up in renal transplantation

The long-term benefit of steroid withdrawal on patient and graft survival is unproven. Steroids were stopped within the first year after kidney transplantation in 223 consecutive low-risk patients initially treated with thymoglobulin and triple-drug therapy. The 15-year actuarial graft survival rate was 83.9%. Risk factors for graft loss were: proteinuria (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.96, P = 0.0003), creatinine >130 micromol/L (HR: 3.37, P = 0.01), recipient age <35 years (HR: 5.31, P = 0.001), and no mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment (HR: 8.83, P = 0.04). Interestingly, recipient age and no MMF treatment were not risk factors in higher-risk patients in whom steroids were continued. The 2-year incidence of acute rejection following steroid withdrawal was 12.1%; the graft survival rate was lower in this group (71.1%). Our findings indicate that late steroid withdrawal results in excellent long-term outcome in most low-risk patients, but it should be attempted with caution in younger patients and when MMF is not used.

Long-term prospective study of steroid withdrawal in kidney and heart transplant recipients

A large prospective study of steroid withdrawal was performed within the framework of the Collaborative Transplant Study to analyze long-term graft and patient outcome in renal and heart transplant recipients. Steroids were withdrawn no earlier than 6 months posttransplantation. A comparison of 7-year outcomes in renal transplant recipients (94% receiving cyclosporine; 97% Caucasian) showed a benefit of steroid withdrawal versus steroid continuation in retrospectively matched controls, for graft survival (81.9% +/- 1.8% vs. 75.3% +/- 1.2%, p = 0.0001), patient survival (88.8% +/- 1.5% vs. 84.3 +/- 1.0%; p = 0.0016) and death-censored graft survival (91.8% +/- 1.3% vs. 87.9%+/- 1.0%: p = 0.0091). Steroid withdrawal was associated with improved graft survival in heart recipients also (76.2% +/- 2.4% vs. 66.9% +/- 1.7%, p = 0.0008). A total of 58.6% of renal recipients and 44.3% of heart recipients never required steroids during follow up. Rates of acute rejection and renal dysfunction did not differ between steroid-free and steroid-continuation groups. Steroid withdrawal was associated with significantly improved cardiovascular risk factors compared with steroid continuation. Rates of the development of osteoporosis and cataracts did not differ in the entire patient cohort, but were strikingly lower in patients taken off steroids during the first posttransplant year.

A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind Study of Early Corticosteroid Cessation Versus Long-Term Maintenance of Corticosteroid Therapy With Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Primary Renal Transplant Recipients: One Year Report

This report summarizes year 1 blinded data from a 5-year prospective, randomized (1:1, stratified by race and donor type), multicenter, double-blind study comparing treatment failure rates between early cessation of corticosteroid therapy and long-term corticosteroid maintenance therapy in 397 primary renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with antibody induction. Sixteen (4.1%) patients died or experienced graft loss during year 1 (9 deaths, 6 graft losses, and 1 death with a graft loss). Fifty-nine (15.3%) patients experienced rejection; 40 (10.4%) of these cases were biopsy-confirmed. Values for 10-year predictive risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) estimated from the Framingham Heart Study scores showed a shift from baseline toward a more favorable risk profile. Renal transplant recipients treated with a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen and either early cessation or maintenance of corticosteroid therapy experienced excellent patient and graft survival, low acute rejection rates, low rate of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (9.0%), and improved CHD risk profile at 1 year posttransplantation.

Steroid withdrawal in pediatric and adult renal transplant recipients

Corticosteroids are still a cornerstone in the immunosuppressive regimen in pediatric renal transplant recipients despite their numerous side effects, such as inhibition of longitudinal growth, body disfigurement, arterial hypertension, cardiovascular complications, osteopathy, and others. Previous attempts to spare steroids in cyclosporine (CsA)-based protocols have been associated with an increased risk for acute rejection episodes. The recent introduction of more-potent immunosuppressive medications, such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), have, however, renewed interest in steroid-sparing protocols to avoid or ameliorate steroid-associated side effects. Recent studies in Caucasian adult renal transplant recipients receiving CsA and MMF have shown a beneficial effect of late (>/=6 months post transplant) steroid withdrawal on steroid-associated side effects without the burden of an increased rate of acute rejection episodes. These favorable results compared with previous reports in patients on CsA and azathioprine (AZA) can be ascribed to the higher immunosuppressive potency of MMF compared with AZA. We have shown in a retrospective case control study in 40 pediatric renal transplant recipients that late steroid withdrawal is safe and successful in stable patients under an immunosuppressive maintenance therapy with CsA and MMF. The Mid-European Study Group on Pediatric Renal Transplantation and the Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Padiatrische Nephrologie are currently performing a prospective randomized trial to validate these observations.

Lessons from cyclosporine monotherapy in renal transplantation: the impact of acute rejection on long-term allograft outcome

The introduction of cyclosporine in kidney transplantation rapidly improved short and medium term graft and patient survival rates. Initially many trials used cyclosporine monotherapy to avoid steroid toxicity, but high acute rejection rates lead to a change in the immunosuppressant scheme. The use of prophylactic steroids significantly decreased acute rejection rates, but the long-term benefit of such a reduction has not been assessed.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the impact of early acute rejection on long-term outcome (10 years) in 264 consecutive renal transplants performed in a single institution between 1986 and 1993 using cyclosporine monotherapy (CM) (n=139) versus cyclosporine and prednisone (CS) (n=125). Different protocols were used for elderly or immunological high-risk patients and for transplants with delayed graft function and therefore these patients are not included. The incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes and long-term patient and graft survivals were analyzed.

RESULTS

At 1 year, acute rejection episodes showed significantly higher frequency in the CM group than in the CS group (72.66% vs 46.40%). Nevertheless, graft and patient survival rates were similar at 1, 5, and 10 years (Graft: 96.38%, 78.77%, and 59.84% vs 92.59%, 75.62%, and 53.44%;

PATIENT

99.27%, 95.06%, and 84.76% and 95.9%, 93.09%, and 88.28%).

CONCLUSION

The addition of prophylactic steroids decreases the incidence of acute rejection but does not improve the long-term graft survival. These findings suggest that in an era of new immunosuppressants, fewer acute rejection episodes will be evident requiring more effort to detect and treat subclinical rejections.

Successful steroid withdrawal in lung transplant recipients: result of a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

Corticosteroids play a key role in immunosuppression after transplantation. However, because chronic steroid treatment may cause significant morbidity and mortality, steroid-free immunosuppression remains a desirable goal. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports on successful steroid withdrawal (SW) in lung transplant recipients.

METHODS

The study group included 35 patients who underwent heart-lung, double-lung or single-lung transplantation. Criteria for initiation of SW were stable pulmonary function tests and absence of clinical or bronchoscopic evidence of acute or chronic rejection in the last 6 months. Pulmonary function, blood pressure and metabolic parameters were compared between the patients who underwent SW and those who did not.

RESULTS

Eight patients (23%) underwent SW. Median follow-up was 19 months (range 11-23 months). Compared to the non-withdrawal group, the withdrawal group was older (60+/-6 vs. 52+/-13 years, P=0.01, r=0.49), had higher rates of emphysema (88% vs. 18%, P=0.01) and use of a cyclosporine-based regimen (62% vs. 26%, P=0.0001), and had longer time from transplantation to the withdrawal attempt (70+/-13 vs. 29+/-26 months, P=0.0002). The SW group showed no adverse effects in graft function and no deterioration on pulmonary function tests. SW had a beneficial metabolic effect, with a decrease in mean cholesterol level from 229+/-45 to 194+/-25 mg/dl (P=0.02) and no significant change in weight, systolic blood pressure or glucose level. In the non-withdrawal group, mean cholesterol levels increased from 175+/-34 to 209+/-57 mg/dl (P=0.0005), weight increased from 72+/-15 to 80+/-14 kg (P=0.0001), and systolic blood pressure increased from 125+/-15 to 139+/-16 mmHg (P=0.001); glucose levels did not change. There was a significant correlation between total cholesterol level and weight in both groups (P=0.0006, r=-0.56 and P=0.01, r=-0.46, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Late SW is safe in stable patients after lung transplantation. There was no evidence of rejection or a deterioration in pulmonary function. Lipid profile improvement and blood pressure stabilization accompanied the termination of steroid therapy.

New developments in immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation

The introduction of new immunosuppressive agents and protocols has improved outcomes for renal transplant recipients by decreasing the risk of rejection and by increasing the function and lifespan of the allograft. This article reviews the major changes in the combinations of therapies used: calcineurin inhibitors, target of rapamycin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, non-depleting monoclonal versus depleting monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies for induction and increasing emphasis on protocols for reduction or avoidance of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors. The new agents with novel immunological targets such as anti-CD40 ligand, LEA29Y, FTY720, anti-CD20 (rituximab, Rituxan, Mabthera) and anti-CH52 (alemtuzumab, Campath), which are under development but have yet to survive the rigors of clinical trials are also discussed. In the presence of low early rejection rates, immunosuppressive therapy is setting new goals such as better graft function (glomerular filtration rates), reduction in adverse effects such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and drug toxicity and, above all, the prevention of late graft deterioration.

Progress in the clinical application of immunosuppressive drugs in renal transplantation

Although only very few new immunosuppressive drugs have been approved over the past two decades, the introduction of each new drug has progressively reduced the incidence of acute rejection and raised hopes that there would be an increase in long-term allograft survival. It is now consistently possible to achieve acute rejection rates of between 10 and 20%, and in many studies the rate has fallen below 10%. This is important, as acute rejection is one of the most important factors reducing the long-term survival of the allograft as a consequence of the development of chronic allograft nephropathy. The availability of these new agents has allowed experimentation with diverse protocols that explore the possibility of reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids. These include both 'avoidance' and 'withdrawal' protocols. The target of rapamycin inhibitors, sirolimus and everolimus, have extended this paradigm. It is possible, but not yet proved, that their antiproliferative effect on smooth muscle will retard the vascular remodelling characteristic of chronic allograft nephropathy, atherosclerosis and hypertension. This review concentrates on the current progress being made in clinical immunosuppression, and includes data presented at the Transplant 2001 meeting of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, held in May 2001.

Double-blind comparison of two corticosteroid regimens plus mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine for prevention of acute renal allograft rejection

BACKGROUND

Renal transplant recipients experience adverse events attributed to corticosteroid therapy.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 6-month, controlled steroid dose-reduction study in renal transplant recipients with an unblinded 6-month follow-up. In the low/stop arm, corticoste. roids were given at half the dosage of control for 3 months from the date of transplantation, and then withdrawn. Both arms received mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine. The primary endpoint was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 6 months posttransplantation.

RESULTS

There were 248 patients in the control group and 252 in the low/stop group. At 6 months the low/stop group had more biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes than the control (23% vs. 14%; P=0.008). At 12 months this increased to 25% vs. 15%. Most rejections were Banff grade I. Twelve-month graft loss was 5% in the low/stop group vs. 4% in the control. At 6 and 12 months serum cholesterol (P<0.01, P<0.01), triglycer. ides (P<0.01, P<0.01), and systolic blood pressure (P<0.001, P<0.001) were lower in the low/stop group. Diastolic pressure was lower (P<0.01) and lumbar spine bone density was greater (P<0.01) in the low/ stop group at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In renal transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine, reduction and early withdrawal of the prophylactic corticosteroid dose is feasible without an unacceptable increase in serious rejection episodes. This is accompanied by a significant reduction of steroid-related adverse events.

Conversion to rapamycin immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients: report of an initial experience

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of RAPA conversion in patients undergoing cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (Tac) toxicity.

METHODS

Twenty renal transplant recipients were switched to fixed dose rapamycin (RAPA) (5 mg/day) 0 to 204 months posttransplant. Drug monitoring was not initially used to adjust doses. The indications for switch were chronic CsA or Tac nephrotoxicity (12), acute CsA or Tac toxicity (3), severe facial dysmorphism (2), posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in remission (2), and hepatotoxicity in 1. Follow-up is 7 to 24 months.

RESULTS

In the 12 patients switched because of chronic nephrotoxicity there was a significant decrease in serum creatinine [233+/-34 to 210+/-56 micromol/liter (P<0.05) at 6 months]. Facial dysmorphism improved in two patients. No relapse of PTLD was observed. Five patients developed pneumonia (two Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, one infectious mononucleosis with polyclonal PTLD lung infiltrate) and two had bronchiolitis obliterans. There were no deaths. RAPA was discontinued in four patients, because of pneumonia in two, PTLD in one, and oral aphtous ulcers in one. RAPA levels were high (>15 ng/ml) in 7 of 13 (54%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

RAPA conversion provides adequate immunosuppression to enable CsA withdrawal. However, when converting patients to RAPA drug levels should be monitored to avoid over-immunosuppression and adequate antiviral and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prophylaxis should be given.

Withdrawal of steroids from triple-drug therapy in kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND

In renal transplant patients with stable graft function, triple-drug immunosuppression may not be necessary, while withdrawal of steroids may eliminate side effects. The primary aim of this study was to assess the risk of rejection after steroid withdrawal.

METHODS

A total of 88 patients with stable graft function and serum creatinine <160 micromol/l, treated with cyclosporin A, azathioprine and prednisone were randomized into group A (n=46) with a gradual prednisone reduction to zero in the course of 6 months, and group B (n=42) on triple-drug therapy without change. At the time of randomization, fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was carried out in all of the patients. After stopping steroids, the patients were followed up for a period of 12 months.

RESULTS

Four patients failed to complete steroid withdrawal, three due to rejection, and one due to leukopenia. The proportion of rejection in three patients in group A (6.6%) was not significantly different from rejection in two patients in group B (4.8%). The mean value of serum creatinine was not significantly different in both groups in the course of follow-up. A finding of some degree of immunological activity in FNAB was made in four patients in each group, but none of these patients developed rejection. Compared with group B, significant decreases in serum cholesterol and blood leukocytes were observed in group A. Prednisone withdrawal did not have any influence on hypertension and serum triglycerides.

CONCLUSIONS

Gradual withdrawal of steroids is not associated with a higher risk for rejection and has a beneficial effect on serum total cholesterol levels. FNAB was not a useful tool for predicting rejection.

A prospective randomized trial on azathioprine addition to cyclosporine versus cyclosporine monotherapy at steroid withdrawal, 6 months after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Many attempts have been made to withdraw steroid therapy in renal transplant patients in order to avoid its many side effects. Results have been, so far, controversial. In this randomized prospective study, we compare the efficacy of azathioprine adjuncts to cyclosporine at the time of steroid withdrawal, 6 months after transplantation, versus Cyclosporine monotherapy, in preventing acute rejection.

METHODS

One hundred and sixteen kidney transplant patients with good and stable renal function (creatininemia <2 mg/dl) received, in the first 6 months, cyclosporine + steroid. They were then randomized into two groups (A and B), and steroid therapy was withdrawn over 2 months. Group A (58 patients) continued on cyclosporine monotherapy, whereas group B (58 patients) added azathioprine (1 mg/kg/day) at the beginning of randomization and continued on cyclosporine + azathioprine. In both groups, patients resumed steroid therapy at the first episode of acute rejection. Follow-up after randomization was 5.3+/-1.6 years.

RESULTS

After 5 years, the incidence of steroid resumption was 57% in group A and 29% in group B (P<0.02); of those, 68% and 88% of them were within 6 months from randomization. Anti-rejection therapy was always successful. Five-year patient and graft survival rates were 90% and 88% in group A and 100% and 91% in group B. Creatininemia did not differ, at follow-up. Side effects differed only for mild and reversible leukopenia caused by azathioprine in group B.

CONCLUSION

Cyclosporine plus azathioprine is more effective than cyclosporine monotherapy in reducing the incidence of acute rejection after steroid withdrawal. Graft loss as a result of chronic rejection, mild in both groups, did not differ. Steroid withdrawal is feasible and advantageous, and the addition of azathioprine allowed 71% of our selected patients to remain steroid-free.

Factors predicting the long-term success of maintenance cyclosporine monotherapy after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The theoretical aim of maintenance cyclosporine monotherapy (mCsA) after kidney transplantation is to reduce the incidence of the metabolic complications of corticosteroids and to minimize the adverse effects of excessive long-term immunosuppression. This study was performed in low-immunological-risk cadaveric kidney transplant recipients to evaluate the risks and benefits of mCsA and the long-term graft survival, and to determine the factors predicting success of this policy.

METHODS

The multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 329 Caucasian patients receiving mCsA out of 728 first cadaveric kidney transplant recipients. The inclusion criteria were: HLA antibodies < or =25%, serum creatinine <200 micromol/L, and no rejection or only one rejection episode. At the end of the study, we compared the group of patients successfully treated with mCsA (successful group) with those requiring additional immunosuppressive agents (unsuccessful mCsA group).

RESULTS

Overall patient and graft survival rates for the 728 first cadaveric graft were 92% and 64%, respectively, at 8 years. Out of 329 patients enrolled in mCsA, 240 were maintained on this treatment and 89 were withdrawn (3 deaths, 18 graft losses, 68 functional grafts). The 8-year graft survival in the 329 enrolled mCsA patients was 84%, 95% in the successful mCsA group, and 70% in the unsuccessful mCsA group. Multivariate analysis showed that the factors predicting success of mCsA were: donor age <40 years (P = 0.001), serum creatinine at mCsA initiation <125 micromol/L (P = 0.02), no rejection episode before mCsA initiation (P = 0.005), and glomerulopathy as the primary renal disease (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Numerous kidney transplant recipients with a low immunological risk and good and stable renal function may benefit from discontinuation of prednisone and azathioprine in order to reduce the complications related to these drugs. This therapeutic approach had no adverse impact on the overall long-term graft survival for "low risk" and successful patients.

Cyclosporine A and azathioprine are equipotent in chronic kidney allograft rejection

Chronic rejection is the major cause of graft loss after kidney transplantation. Various immunosuppressive protocols have been used to ameliorate this process. We investigated whether cyclosporin A- (CyA) or azathioprine- (Aza) based immunosuppression is better able to slow the progression of chronic rejection. Fisher kidneys were transplanted into bilaterally nephrectomized Lewis rats. Recipients received CyA (1.5 mg/kg/day, s.c.) for 10 days, and were treated from day 11 with either CyA (1.5 mg/kg)+pred (0.15 mg/kg) (C+P),Aza (2 mg/kg)+pred (A+P), vehicle+pred (P), or vehicle alone (controls) (n = 8/group). Proteinuria was regularly assessed and grafts were harvested for morphological, immunohistological, and molecular biological analysis at week 24. By week 12 proteinuria had increased to significant levels. At week 24, proteinuria was significantly lower and creatinine clearance was significantly higher in C+P and A+P, than in P or controls. Morphological analysis supported these functional results: at week 24, glomerulopathy, tubular atrophy and intimal proliferation (as assessed according to the BANFF score) were less pronounced in C+P and A+P, as compared with P or controls. These morphological parameters were accompanied by a reduced infiltration of ED-1+ macrophages and CD-5+ T lymphocytes. In P or controls the synthesis of IL-2Ralpha mRNA was markedly elevated at this time. In parallel to the reduced cellular infiltration, IL-2Ralpha mRNA expression was markedly inhibited, both, in C+P and A+P. There were no significant differences between C+P and A+P regarding the parameters studied. In conclusion, both C+P and A+P reduced the infiltration of activated T lymphocytes, and the pace of chronic kidney allograft rejection. The outcome of C+P and A+P based therapy did not differ significantly.

Excellent long-term graft survival in low risk, primary renal allografts treated with prednisolone-avoidance immunosuppression

Primary avoidance of oral corticosteroids for renal transplant recipients is uncommon. The South Australian renal transplant service used a double therapy (DT) regimen of cyclosporin and azathioprine from August 1986 to July 1996 for low risk (first graft, PRA < 50%) allografts. Oral corticosteroid, prednisolone (P), was reserved for severe rejection or two mild rejection episodes, but could be later withdrawn at the physician's discretion. This regimen is associated with more early acute rejection (Russ et al., Clin Transplant 1990: 4: 26). We have now analysed long-term patient survival (PS) and graft survival (GS) for this group. Of 448 transplants in South Australia between August 1986 and July 1996, 295 commenced DT regimen. Ninety-four (31.8%) never received P at any stage post-transplantation (group 1), 96 (32.5%) were placed on P and later weaned (group 2), and 97 (33%) remained on long-term P (group 3). Technical losses, eight (2.7%), within 30 d of transplantation, were excluded from sub-group analysis. PS for the total DT cohort at 1, 5 and 9 yr post-transplantation was 97, 88 and 74%, respectively. GS over the same time period was 88, 75 and 55%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in survival compared to other 'low risk' grafts in the rest of Australia during the same time period. Mean serum creatinine concentration (CrC) for the DT group at 3 and 6 months and 1, 3, 5 and 10 yr was not significantly different to the rest of the Australian 'low risk' grafts. In the DT cohort, there were 334 acute rejections ( < 90 d) in 206 patients (70%), but only 42 (12.5%) required anti-lymphocyte antibody therapy (OKT3 or ATG) for rejection. PS at 9 yr was not statistically significantly different between groups 1 and 2, but both groups survived better than group 3 (p < 0.0043). GS for group 1 at 1, 5 and 9 yr post-transplantation was 90, 81 and 73%, respectively; for group 2, 98, 87 and 66%, respectively; and for group 3, 84, 63 and 29%, respectively. Statistical significance was reached in group 1 versus 3 (p < 0.001) and group 2 versus 3 (p < 0.001). In summary, a DT regimen in low risk, first renal allografts gives excellent long-term patient and GS and minimises long-term P, despite a high rate of early acute rejection.

Critical threshold of azathioprine dosage for maintenance immunosuppression in kidney graft recipients. Collaborative Transplant Study

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting reports in the literature concerning the efficacy of maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplantation with a regimen of azathioprine and steroids.

METHODS

The daily dosage (mg/kg) of azathioprine administered 1 year after transplantation was analyzed in relation to subsequent long-term graft outcome. Transplants performed from 1985 to 1996 and reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study were analyzed.

RESULTS

In patients on maintenance immunosuppression without cyclosporine, the daily dosage of azathioprine had a highly significant influence on long-term graft outcome. Patients who received > 1.5 mg/kg/ day of azathioprine had a 69% graft survival rate at 7 years, compared with a 55% rate in patients receiving 1.01-1.5 mg/kg/day (P<0.0001) and a 45% rate in patients receiving < or = 1.00 mg/kg/day (P<0.0001). This observation was valid for patients who were taken off cyclosporine during the first year as well as for patients who were treated with azathioprine and steroids (without cyclosporine) from the beginning.

CONCLUSION

Maintenance immunosuppression with azathioprine and steroids results in good long-term kidney graft survival, provided azathioprine is administered at a daily dose of >1.5 mg/kg.