Delayed graft function in the absence of rejection has no long-term impact. A study of cadaver kidney recipients with good graft function at 1 year after transplantation

Characteristics of Delayed Graft Function and Long-Term Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation From Brain-Dead Donors: A Single-Center and Multicenter Registry-Based Retrospective Study

Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation is common and associated with worse graft outcomes. However, little is known about factors affecting graft survival post-DGF. We studied the association of cold ischemia time (CIT) and Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) with the long-term outcomes of deceased brain-dead donor kidneys with and without DGF. Data from Finland (n = 2,637) and from the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) registry (n = 61,405) was used. The association of KDPI and CIT with the graft survival of kidneys with or without DGF was studied using multivariable models. 849 (32%) kidneys had DGF in the Finnish cohort. DGF and KDPI were independent risk factors for graft loss, [HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.14-1.53), p < 0.001, and HR 1.01 per one point (95% CI 1.01-1.01), p < 0.001, respectively], but CIT was not, [HR 1.00 per CIT hour (95% CI 0.99-1.02), p = 0.84]. The association of DGF remained similar regardless of CIT and KDPI. The US cohort had similar results, but the association of DGF was stronger with higher KDPI. In conclusion, DGF and KDPI, but not CIT, are independently associated with graft survival. The association of DGF with worse graft survival is consistent across different CITs but stronger among marginal donors.

Role of post-transplant graft scintigraphy in kidney donation after circulatory death

Background

There is no consensus on how to predict post-transplant function of donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidneys. Thus, we aimed to identify renal scintigraphy parameters that could predict 1-year kidney function.

Methods

In this single center study, we included all consecutive DCD kidney recipients between 2013 and 2021 (n = 29). Patients who did not have a scintigraphy within 10 days of transplantation (n = 3), recipients of multiple organs and less than 18 years old were excluded (n = 1). Primary endpoint was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

Results

Median eGFR and serum creatinine at 1 year were 67 µmol/L (56-81) and 111 ml/min (99-132), respectively. Among parameters tested, the 3rd/2nd-minute activity ratio had the best diagnostic performance (AUC: 0.74 and 0.71, for eGFR and creatinine) 1 year post transplantation. Using 1.21 as the best cut off, the 3rd/2nd-minute activity ratio specificity and sensitivity to predict eGFR >60 ml/min was 0.82 and 0.83. Renal function was significantly better at 1 week, 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation in patients with 3rd/2nd-minute activity ratios above 1.21.

Conclusion

This study suggests that the 3rd/2nd-minute activity ratio can predict graft function at 1 year. The benefit of post-transplant scintigraphy should be further validated in a prospective cohort.

Clinical indicators of slow graft function and outcome after pediatric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Lesser degrees of perioperative ischemia-reperfusion injury that does not require dialysis may nonetheless influence allograft outcomes, necessitating evaluation of suitable surrogate indicators of perioperative allograft injury.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of pediatric kidney transplants evaluated two indicators representing pace and completeness of recovery, for association with 12-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and first-year rate of eGFR decline: time to creatinine nadir (TTN) and ratio of recipient/donor unadjusted GFR (uGFR_R/D ) at 1-month post-transplant. Donor, recipient, and perioperative risk factors were tested further for association with these 2 indicators.

RESULTS

179 patients (190 transplants) aged 13 (IQR 7-17) years and 56% male were included. Twelve-month eGFR was strongly associated with unadjusted GFR at 1 month (uGFR_1M , p < .001) and uGFR_R/D (p = .003), but not with TTN. None of the indicators was associated with the rate of subsequent eGFR decline after 1-month post-transplant. As a potential surrogate indicator, uGFR_1M is effectively modeled by TTN and uGFR_R/D (adjusted R²  = 0.57) and is associated with 12-month eGFR (β = 0.81 ± 0.08; p < .001). Clinical factors associated with uGFR_R/D included donor uGFR (p < .001), BSA (p = .026), age (p = .074), and recipient BSA (p < .001). Factors associated with pace of recovery (TTN) included donor uGFR (p = .018), type (p = .019), and recipient BSA (p = .022).

CONCLUSIONS

The uGFR_R/D ratio, but not TTN, is a useful indicator of perioperative allograft damage that is associated with one-year functional outcome; and uGFR_1M is a potential early surrogate outcome. Donor, recipient, and perioperative factors that are associated with slow allograft function are identified.

Duration of delayed graft function and its impact on graft outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is controversy regarding the impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on kidney transplant outcomes. We hypothesize that the duration of DGF, rather than DGF itself, is associated with long-term kidney graft function.

METHODS

We analyzed all deceased donor kidney transplants (DDKT) done at our center between 2008 to 2020. We determined factors associated with DGF duration. DGF duration was assessed at three 14-day intervals: < 14 DGF days, 14-27 DGF days, > 28 DGF days. We studied the impact of DGF duration on survival and graft function and resource utilization, including hospital length of stay and readmissions.

RESULTS

1714 DDKT recipients were included, 59.4% (n = 1018) had DGF. The median DGF duration was 10 days IQR (6,15). The majority of recipients (95%) had resolution of DGF within 28 days. Donor factors associated with DGF days were longer cold ischemia time, donor on inotropes, older age, donation after circulatory death, higher terminal creatinine, and hypertension. Recipient factors associated with increased DGF duration included male sex, length on dialysis before transplant, and higher body mass index. There were no differences in acute rejection events or interstitial fibrosis progression by 4 months when comparing DGF days. The median length of stay was 3 days. However, readmissions increased with increasing DGF duration. Death-censored graft survival was not associated with the length of DGF except when DGF lasted > 28 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Inferior graft survival was observed only in recipients of DDKT with DGF lasting beyond 28 days. DGF lasting < 28 days had no impact on graft survival. Duration of DGF, rather than DGF itself, is associated with graft survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospective study approved by Mayo Clinic IRB number ID: 20-011561.

Circulating CXCL10 and IL-6 in solid organ donors after brain death predict graft outcomes

We tested the hypothesis that circulating CXCL10 and IL-6 in donor after brain death provide independent additional predictors of graft outcome. From January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2012 all donors after brain death managed by the NITp (n = 1100) were prospectively included in this study. CXCL10 and IL-6 were measured on serum collected for the crossmatch at the beginning of the observation period. Graft outcome in recipients who received kidney (n = 1325, follow-up 4.9 years), liver (n = 815, follow-up 4.3 years) and heart (n = 272, follow-up 5 years) was evaluated. Both CXCL-10 and IL-6 showed increased concentration in donors after brain death. The intensive care unit stay, the hemodynamic instability, the cause of death, the presence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease and the presence of ongoing infection resulted as significant determinants of IL-6 and CXCL10 donor concentrations. Both cytokines resulted as independent predictors of Immediate Graft Function. Donor IL-6 or CXCL10 were associated with graft failure after liver transplant, and acted as predictors of recipient survival after kidney, liver and heart transplantation. Serum donor IL-6 and CXCL10 concentration can provide independent incremental prediction of graft outcome among recipients followed according to standard clinical practice.

Outcomes From Right Versus Left Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplants: A US National Cohort Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

There may be important transplant-related differences between right and left kidneys, including logistical/surgical considerations about vessel length for the right compared to the left kidney from the same donor. Because US centers choose between the right and left kidney when their recipient is ranked higher on a "match-run," we sought to determine whether deceased-donor right kidneys have had worse posttransplantation outcomes than left kidneys.

STUDY DESIGN

Paired Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network analysis.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Deceased-donor kidney pairs transplanted during 1990 to 2016.

EXPOSURE

Right versus left kidney controlling for other significant factors.

OUTCOMES

Delayed graft function (DGF), all-cause and death-censored graft failure, and mortality.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Multivariable conditional logistic regression for DGF; proportional hazards models (conditional on same donor) for failure/mortality with right kidneys (operationalized as 6-month time-varying coefficients) adjusting for DGF and other confounders.

RESULTS

87,112 recipient pairs shared the following donor characteristics: mean age of 41 ± 14 years, 60% males, and 11% with cardiac death. Recipient characteristics were numerically similar by donor kidney side but with some statistical differences given the sample size. Right kidneys had slightly longer cold ischemia time. DGF occurred more often for right kidneys (28% vs 25.8%; P < 0.001; adjusted OR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.12-1.17]). The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for all-cause graft failure with right kidneys within 6 months was 1.07 (95% CI, 1.03-1.11), and was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.01) thereafter. The aHRs for death-censored graft failure with right kidneys before and after 6 months were 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.16) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99), respectively; the corresonding aHRs for mortality were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.93-1.04) and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.98-1.03), respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Registry data, different transplant eras, reasons for kidney side unavailable.

CONCLUSIONS

There is modest association for transplantation of right kidneys with DGF and graft loss within the first 6 months, which is lost beyond this time point. These findings do not support the use of laterality of deceased-donor kidneys as an important factor in organ acceptance decisions.

Association Between Duration of Delayed Graft Function, Acute Rejection, and Allograft Outcome After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Prolonged duration of delayed graft function (DGF) may be associated with adverse allograft outcomes, but the association between threshold duration of DGF, acute rejection and long-term allograft loss remains undefined. We aimed to determine the impact of DGF duration on allograft outcomes and to assess whether this association was mediated by acute rejection.

METHODS

Using data from the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, Cox proportional modeling was used to determine the association between quartiles of DGF duration, acute rejection at 6 months and death-censored graft loss (DCGL). Mediation analysis was conducted to determine whether acute rejection was a causal intermediate between DGF and DCGL.

RESULTS

Of 7668 deceased donor kidney transplants between 1997 and 2014, 1497 (19.5%) recipients experienced DGF requiring dialysis. The median (interquartile range) duration of DGF was 7 (9) days, with 25% requiring dialysis for 14 days or longer. Among recipients who had experienced a DGF duration of 1 to 4 days, the adjusted hazard ratio for duration of 5 to 7, 8 to 13, and 14 days or longer were 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.55; P = 0.43), 1.44 (95% CI, 1.08-1.91; P = 0.013), and 1.99 (95% CI, 1.50-2.65; P < 0.001), respectively, for acute rejection; and were 1.10 (95% CI< 0.73-1.67; P = 0.64), 1.45 (95% CI, 1.00-2.11; P = 0.05) and 1.60 (95% CI, 1.10-2.31; P = 0.01), respectively, for DCGL. On average, 8% of the effects between DGF duration and DCGL were explained by acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a direct dose-dependent effect between DGF duration and DCGL, with acute rejection explaining less than 10% of the effects between DGF duration and DCGL. Future research identifying other potential modifiable mediators that lies in the causal pathway between DGF duration and allograft loss is essential.

Duration of delayed graft function and outcomes after kidney transplantation from controlled donation after circulatory death donors: a retrospective study

The impact of the duration of delayed graft function (DGF) on graft survival is poorly characterized in controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD) donor kidney transplantation. A retrospective analysis was performed on 225 DCD donor kidney transplants between 2011 and 2016. When patients with primary nonfunction were excluded (n = 9), 141 recipients (65%) had DGF, with median (IQR) duration of dialysis dependency of 6 (2-11.75) days. Longer duration of dialysis dependency was associated with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year, and a higher rate of acute rejection. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the presence of DGF was associated with lower graft survival (log-rank test P = 0.034), though duration of DGF was not (P = 0.723). However, multivariable Cox regression analysis found that only acute rejection was independently associated with lower graft survival [HR (95% CI) 4.302 (1.617-11.450); P = 0.003], whereas the presence of DGF and DGF duration were not. In controlled DCD kidney transplantation, DGF duration itself may not be independently associated with graft survival; rather, it may be that acute rejection associated with prolonged DGF is the poor prognostic factor.

Comparative Assessment of uNGAL, uNAG and Cystatin C As Early Biomarkers in Renal Post-Transplant Patients

Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL), urinary N-acetyl-bd-glucosaminidase (NAG), urinary α1-microglobulin/creatinine ratio and cystatin C have been suggested as potential early markers of delayed graft function (DGF) following kidney transplantation. We conducted a prospective study in 50 consecutive kidney transplant recipients to evaluate serial changes of these biomarkers within the first week after transplantation and assess their performance in predicting DGF (dialysis requirement during initial post-transplant week) and graft function throughout the first year. Urine samples were collected on post-transplantation days 0, 1, 2, 4, and 7. Statistical analysis: Linear mixed and multivariable regression models, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC), and areas under ROC curves were used. At all-time points, mean urinary NGAL levels were significantly higher in patients developing DGF. Shortly after transplantation (3-6 h), uNGAL and uNAG values were higher in DGF recipients (on average +242 ng/mL; NAG – 6.8 U/mmol creatinine, considering mean dialysis time of 4.1 years) and rose further in the following days, contrasting with prompt function recipients. On Day-1 uNGAL levels accurately predicted DGF (AUC-ROC = 0.93), with a performance higher than serum creatinine (AUC-ROC = 0.76), and similar to cystatin C (AUC-ROC = 0.95). Multivariable analyses revealed that uNGAL levels at days 4 and 7 were strongly associated with one-year serum creatinine level. Urinary NGAL, serum cystatin C is an early marker of graft injury and is independently associated with dialysis requirement within one week after transplantation and one-year graft function.

Long-term effects of delayed graft function duration on function and survival of deceased donor kidney transplants

Introduction:

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a frequent complication after deceased donor kidney transplantation with an impact on the prognosis of the transplant. Despite this, long-term impact of DGF on graft function after deceased donor kidney transplantation has not been properly evaluated.

Objective:

The main objective of this study was to evaluate risk factors for DGF and the impact of its occurrence and length on graft survival and function.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort study was performed in 517 kidney transplant recipients who received a deceased donor organ between January 2008 and December 2013.

Results:

The incidence of DGF was 69.3% and it was independently associated with donor's final serum creatinine and age, cold ischemia time, use of antibody induction therapy and recipient's diabetes mellitus. The occurrence of DGF was also associated with a higher incidence of Banff ≥ 1A grade acute rejection (P = 0.017), lower graft function up to six years after transplantation and lower death-censored graft survival at 1 and 5 years (P < 0.05). DGF period longer than 14 days was associated with higher incidence of death-censored graft loss (P = 0.038) and poorer graft function (P < 0.001). No differences were found in patient survival.

Conclusions:

The occurrence of DGF has a long-lasting detrimental impact on graft function and survival and this impact is even more pronounced when DGF lasts longer than two weeks.

Delayed Graft Function, Predictive Factors, and 7-Year Outcome of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients With Different Immunologic Profiles

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is the major post-transplant cause of deleterious effects to the allograft and is associated with poor allograft survival. The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of 236 kidney transplant recipients with different immunologic profiles.

METHODS

All patients underwent transplantation (2008-2016) with a deceased donor at the University Hospital of the Faculty of Medical Science, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to immunologic profiles: nonsensitized (NS), sensitized without donor-specific antibody (SDSA-), or sensitized with donor-specific antibody (SDSA+).

RESULTS

DGF was observed in 128 (54.24%), including 63 (49.22%) NS, 51 (39.84%) SDSA-, and 14 (10.94%) SDSA+ patients. The development of DGF was associated with dialysis for ≥49.25 months (odds ratio [OR] 2.30), donor age ≥42.25 years (OR 1.77), donor end creatinine level >1.22 mg/dL (OR 1.94), and cold ischemia time >12 hours (OR 2.45). Of the 55 patients with rejections, 37 (15.68%) had T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and 18 (7.63%) had antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Nine patients (16.36%) exhibited graft loss, 2 (0.85%) via TCMR in the SDSA- DGF+ group and 7 (2.97%) via AMR, including 2 NS DGF-, 2 SDSA- DGF-, 1 SDSA- DGF+, and 2 SDSA+ DGF+ patients. Graft survival significantly differed between the NSDGF- and SDSA- DGF+ groups (P = .014) and between the NS DGF- and SDSA+ DGF- groups (P = .036).

CONCLUSION

In the 7-year period following transplantation, TCMR was more prevalent than AMR among patients with DGF. Graft loss was less prevalent among patients with TCMR than among those with AMR.

Delayed graft function is associated with an increased rate of renal allograft rejection: A retrospective single center analysis

INTRODUCTION

The association of delayed graft function (DGF) and biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) of renal allografts is controversial. Borderline rejections comprise a major portion of biopsy results but the significance of such histologic changes is debated. The present study explores the impact of DGF on BPAR with a special emphasis on discriminating the effects of borderline rejection.

METHODS

Single center analysis of 417 deceased donor kidney recipients (age>18; transplantation date 1/2008-2/2015). Patients with primary non-function were excluded. DGF was defined as the need for dialysis within the first week after transplantation. Acute rejection was defined according to Banff criteria. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the relationship of DGF with BPAR within the first year.

RESULTS

No graft loss was observed during the first year after transplantation. DGF significantly associated with BPAR in the first year, irrespective of whether borderline rejections were included (HR 1.71, 95%CI 1.16,2.53) or excluded (HR 1.79, 95%CI 1.13,2.84).

CONCLUSION

DGF is significantly associated with rejection-with or without borderline changes-within the first year.

A comparison of three induction therapies on patients with delayed graft function after kidney transplantation

We compare the outcomes of induction therapies with either methylprednisolone (group 1, n = 58), basiliximab (group 2, n = 56) or alemtuzumab (group 3, n = 98) in primary deceased donor kidney transplants with delayed graft function (DGF). Protocol biopsies were performed. Maintenance was tacrolimus and mycophenolate with steroid (group 1 and 2) or without steroid (group 3). One-year biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (AR) rates were 27.6, 19.6 and 10.2 % in group 1, 2 and 3 (p = 0.007). AR was significantly lower in group 3 (p = 0.002) and group 2 (p = 0.03) than in group 1. One-year graft survival rates were 90, 96 and 100 % in group 1, 2 and 3 (log rank p = 0.006). Group 1 had inferior graft survival than group 2 (p = 0.03) and group 3 (p = 0.002). The patient survival rates were not different (96.6, 98.2 and 100 %, log rank p = 0.81). Multivariable analysis using methylprednisolone induction as control indicated that alemtuzumab (OR 0.31, 95 % CI 0.11-0.82; p = 0.03) and basiliximab (OR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.23-0.98; p = 0.018) were associated with lower risk of AR. Therefore, alemtuzumab or basiliximab induction decreases AR and improves graft survival than methylprednisolone alone in patients with DGF. Alemtuzumab induction might also allow patients with DGF to be maintained with contemporary steroid-withdrawal protocol.

Ischemia and reperfusion injury in renal transplantation: hemodynamic and immunological paradigms

Ischemia and reperfusion injury is an inevitable event in renal transplantation. The most important consequences are delayed graft function, longer length of stay, higher hospital costs, high risk of acute rejection, and negative impact of long-term follow-up. Currently, many factors are involved in their pathophysiology and could be classified into two different paradigms for education purposes: hemodynamic and immune. The hemodynamic paradigm is described as the reduction of oxygen delivery due to blood flow interruption, involving many hormone systems, and oxygen-free radicals produced after reperfusion. The immune paradigm has been recently described and involves immune system cells, especially T cells, with a central role in this injury. According to these concepts, new strategies to prevent ischemia and reperfusion injury have been studied, particularly the more physiological forms of storing the kidney, such as the pump machine and the use of antilymphocyte antibody therapy before reperfusion. Pump machine perfusion reduces delayed graft function prevalence and length of stay at hospital, and increases long-term graft survival. The use of antilymphocyte antibody therapy before reperfusion, such as Thymoglobulin™, can reduce the prevalence of delayed graft function and chronic graft dysfunction.

Center-level variation in the development of delayed graft function after deceased donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Patient-level risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF) have been well described. However, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network definition of DGF is based on dialysis in the first week, which is subject to center-level practice patterns. It remains unclear if there are center-level differences in DGF and if measurable center characteristics can explain these differences.

METHODS

Using the 2003 to 2012 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we developed a hierarchical (multilevel) model to determine the association between center characteristics and DGF incidence after adjusting for known patient risk factors and to quantify residual variability across centers after adjustment for these factors.

RESULTS

Of 82,143 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients, 27.0% developed DGF, with a range across centers of 3.2% to 63.3%. A center's proportion of preemptive transplants (odds ratio [OR], 0.83; per 5% increment; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.74-;0.93; P = 0.001) and kidneys with longer than 30 hr of cold ischemia time (CIT) (OR, 0.95; per 5% increment; 95% CI, 0.92-;0.98; P = 0.001) were associated with less DGF. A center's proportion of donation after cardiac death donors (OR, 1.12; per 5% increment; 95% CI, 1.03-;1.17; P < 0.001) and imported kidneys (OR, 1.06; per 5% increment; 95% CI, 1.03-;1.10; P < 0.001) were associated with more DGF. After patient-level and center-level adjustments, only 41.8% of centers had DGF incidences consistent with the national median and 28.2% had incidences above the national median.

CONCLUSION

Significant heterogeneity in DGF incidences across centers, even after adjusting for patient-level and center-level characteristics, calls into question the generalizability and validity of the current DGF definition. Enhanced understanding of center-level variability and improving the definition of DGF accordingly may improve DGF's utility in clinical care and as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials.

Delayed graft function and the risk of acute rejection in the modern era of kidney transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) is commonly considered a risk factor for acute rejection, although this finding has not been uniformly observed across all studies. The link between DGF and acute rejection may have changed over time due to advances in immunosuppression and medical management. Here we conducted a cohort study of 645 patients over 12 years to evaluate the association of DGF and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) in a modern cohort of kidney transplant recipients. DGF was defined as the need for at least one dialysis session in the first week after kidney transplantation. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative probabilities of BPAR were 16.0, 21.8, and 22.6% in the DGF group, significantly different from the 10.1, 12.4, and 15.7% in the non-DGF group. In multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, the adjusted relative hazard for BPAR in DGF (vs. no DGF) was 1.55 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03, 2.32). This association was generally robust to different definitions of DGF. The relative hazard was also similarly elevated for T-cell- or antibody-mediated BPAR (1.52 (0.92, 2.51) and 1.54 (0.85, 2.77), respectively). Finally, the association was consistent across clinically relevant subgroups. Thus DGF remains an important risk factor for BPAR in a contemporary cohort of kidney transplant recipients. Interventions to reduce the risk of DGF and/or its aftereffects remain of paramount importance to improve kidney transplant outcomes.

The effect of delayed graft function on graft and patient survival in kidney transplantation: an approach using competing events analysis

OBJECTIVE

In kidney transplantation, the impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on long-term graft and patient survival is controversial. We examined the impact of DGF on graft and recipient survival by accounting for the possibility that death with graft function may act as a competing risk for allograft failure.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We used data from 1281 adult primary deceased-donor kidney recipients whose allografts functioned at least 1 year.

RESULTS

The probability of graft loss occurrence is overestimated using the complement of Kaplan-Meier estimates (1-KM). Both the cause-specific Cox proportional hazard regression model (standard Cox) and the subdistribution hazard regression model proposed by Fine and Gray showed that DGF was associated with shorter time to graft failure (csHR = 2.0, P = 0.002; sHR = 1.57, P = 0.009), independent of acute rejection (AR) and after adjusting for traditional factors associated with graft failure. Regarding patient survival, DGF was a predictor of patient death using the cause-specific Cox model (csHR = 1.57, P = 0.029) but not using the subdistribution model.

CONCLUSIONS

The probability of graft loss from competing end points should not be reported with the 1-KM. Application of a regression model for subdistribution hazard showed that, independent of AR, DGF has a detrimental effect on long-term graft survival, but not on patient survival.

Effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury in kidney transplantation: risk factors and early and long-term outcomes in a single center

INTRODUCTION

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) causes a high rate of delayed graft function (DGF), the most frequent complication in the immediate postoperative period after cadaveric donor kidney transplantation. Herein we evaluated the impact of donor and recipient characteristics on DGF development in terms of the incidence of acute rejection episodes, hospital stay, renal function, and long-term graft and patient survivals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 1998 and July 2011, 761 patients underwent cadaveric donor kidney transplantations. DGF was defined as the need for dialysis in the first week. Patients were subdivided according to initial graft function as immediate graft function (IGF) or DGF.

RESULTS

DGF observed in 241 patients (31.6%) was associated independently with expanded criteria donors, extended cold ischemia time, Karpinsky histological score, and prior dialysis duration both univariate and multivariate analysis. The incidence of acute rejection episodes was 18.1% among the DGF group versus 1.3% in the IGF group (P < .01). DGF significantly reduced both graft and patient survivals at 6, 12, 36, and 60 months.

CONCLUSION

DGF was responsible for a longer hospital stay, worse early and long-term renal function, a higher incidence of acute rejection episodes as well as reduced graft and patient survivals.

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in kidney transplantation is an early marker of graft dysfunction and is associated with one-year renal function

Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) has been suggested as potential early marker of delayed graft function (DGF) following kidney transplantation (KTx). We conducted a prospective study in 40 consecutive KTx recipients to evaluate serial changes of uNGAL within the first week after KTx and assess its performance in predicting DGF (dialysis requirement during initial posttransplant week) and graft function throughout first year. Urine samples were collected on post-KTx days 0, 1, 2, 4, and 7. Linear mixed and multivariable regression models, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC), and areas under ROC curves were used. At all-time points, mean uNGAL levels were significantly higher in patients developing DGF (n = 18). Shortly after KTx (3–6 h), uNGAL values were higher in DGF recipients (on average +242 ng/mL, considering mean dialysis time of 4.1 years) and rose further in following days, contrasting with prompt function recipients. Day-1 uNGAL levels accurately predicted DGF (AUC-ROC = 0.93), with a performance higher than serum creatinine (AUC-ROC = 0.76), and similar to cystatin C (AUC-ROC = 0.95). Multivariable analyses revealed that uNGAL levels at days 4 and 7 were strongly associated with one-year serum creatinine. Urinary NGAL is an early marker of graft injury and is independently associated with dialysis requirement within one week after KTx and one-year graft function.

Summary of FDA workshop on ischemia reperfusion injury in kidney transplantation

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) held an open public workshop in September 2011 to discuss the current state of science related to the effects of ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) on outcomes in kidney transplantation. Topics included the development of IRI and delayed graft function (DGF), histology and biomarkers, donor factors, recipient factors, organ quality and organ preservation by means of cold storage solutions or machine perfusion. Various mechanisms of injury and maladaptive response to IRI were discussed as potential targets of intervention. Animal models evaluating specific pathophysiological pathways were presented, as were the limitations of extrapolating animal results to humans. Clinical trials of various drug products administered in the peri-transplant period were summarized; a few demonstrated early improvements in DGF, but none demonstrated an improvement in late graft function. Clinical trial design for IRI and DGF were also discussed.

Is delayed graft function causally associated with long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation? Instrumental variable analysis

BACKGROUND

Although some studies have found an association between delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation and worse long-term outcomes, a causal relationship remains controversial. We investigated this relationship using an instrumental variables model (IVM), a quasi-randomization technique for drawing causal inferences.

METHODS

We identified 80,690 adult, deceased-donor, kidney-only transplant recipients from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 1997 and 2010. We used cold ischemia time (CIT) as an instrument to test the hypothesis that DGF causes death-censored graft failure and mortality at 1 and 5 years after transplantation, controlling for an array of characteristics known to affect patient and graft survival. We compared our IVM results with a multivariable linear probability model.

RESULTS

DGF occurred in 27% of our sample. Graft failure rates at 1 and 5 years were 6% and 22%, respectively, and 1-year and 5-year mortality rates were 5% and 20%, respectively. In the linear probability model, DGF was associated with increased risk of both graft failure and mortality at 1 and 5 years (P<0.001). In the IVM, we found evidence suggesting a causal relationship between DGF and death-censored graft failure at both 1 year (13.5% increase; P<0.001) and 5 years (16.2% increase; P<0.001) and between DGF and mortality at both 1 year (7.1% increase; P<0.001) and 5 years (11.0% increase; P<0.01). Results were robust to exclusion of lower quality as well as pumped kidneys and use of a creatinine-based definition for DGF.

CONCLUSION

Instrumental variables analysis supports a causal relationship between DGF and both graft failure and mortality.

Influence of delayed graft function and acute rejection on outcomes after kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection (AR) exert an adverse impact on graft outcomes after kidney transplantation using organs from donation after brain-stem death (DBD) donors. Here, we examine the impact of DGF and AR on graft survival in kidney transplants using organs from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study of DCD and DBD donor kidney transplants. We compared 1- and 4-year graft and patient survival rates, as well as death-censored graft survival (DCGS) rates, between the two groups using univariate analysis, and the impact of DGF and AR on graft function was compared using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty DCD and 206 DBD donor transplants were analyzed. Median follow-up was 4.5 years. The incidence of DGF was higher among DCD recipients (73% vs. 27%, P<0.001), and AR was higher among DBD recipients (23% vs. 9%, P<0.001). One-year and 4-year graft survival rates were similar (DCD 94% and 79% vs. DBD 90% and 82%). Among recipients with DGF, the 4-year DCGS rate was better for DCD recipients compared with DBD recipients (100% vs. 92%, P=0.04). Neither DGF nor AR affected the 1-year graft survival rate in DCD recipients, whereas in DBD recipients, the 1-year graft survival rate was worse in the presence of DGF (88% vs. 96%, P=0.04) and the 4-year DCGS rate was worse in the presence of AR (88% vs. 96%, P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Despite the high incidence of DGF, medium-term outcomes of DCD kidney transplants are comparable to those from DBD transplants. Short-term graft survival from DCD transplants is not adversely influenced by DGF and AR, unlike in DBD transplants.

Delayed graft function and long-term outcome in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

There are still many controversies about the impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on kidney transplantation outcome. The aims of this study were to define factors associated with DGF and to ascertain the relative impact of DGF on kidney transplantation outcome, both in the early postoperative period and in long-term follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred kidney transplant recipients were reviewed to assess the clinical impact of DGF on long-term outcome.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of DGF was 24.3%. DGF was significantly associated with increasing recipient and donor age, duration of dialysis, and cold ischemia time. Patients with DGF displayed a significantly worse graft (P = .005) and patient (P < .001) survival compared with recipients with immediate function.

CONCLUSION

DGF is a frequent complication of renal transplantation and may be associated with a reduced graft and even patient survival. Strategies to prevent graft injury and, more specifically, DGF may be an important clue to provide a better long-term outcome in kidney transplantation.

Slow early graft function: a neglected entity after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

After renal transplantation, early graft function (EGF) can be divided into delayed graft function (DGF), slow graft function (SGF) and immediate graft function (IGF). DGF is well documented. However, when evaluating the long-term significance of early function, the literature shows conflicting definitions and inconsistent results. In addition, SGF, a new entity separate to DGF and IGF, is a recent and poorly understood development.

AIM

To investigate the risk factors for and the impact of poor EGF (PEGF) on long-term outcome.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed the records of local adult patients who underwent renal transplantation at the Groote Schuur Hospital (Cape Town, South Africa) between 2004 and 2008. EGF was divided according to day 5 serum creatinine into IGF (serum creatinine <150 µmol/l), SGF (serum creatinine >150 but <450 µmol/l) and DGF (serum creatinine >450 µmol/l or dialysis in the first week). DGF and SGF together comprised PEGF, with IGF alone representing good EGF (GEGF).

RESULTS

A total of 121 patients (77 men, 44 women; mean age 39 years, range 14-67) were included in the study. Eighteen were excluded due to nephrectomy (n = 8), death (n = 6) or loss to follow-up (n = 4) within the first year. Analysis of cadaveric donors showed no significant risk factors for PEGF with the exception of cold ischaemic time, which differed significantly between the GEGF and PEGF groups, with means of 12 and 16 h, respectively (p = 0.013). Considering both living and cadaveric grafts, the 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly different between IGF and DGF (p = 0.038) as well as between IGF and SGF (p = 0.028), with no significant difference between SGF and DGF (p > 0.05). A comparison of the PEGF and GEGF groups yielded significantly different 1-year eGFR values (60 and 50 ml/min, respectively; p = 0.07), with PEGF also associated with a longer hospital stay (20 vs. 14 days; p = 0.00005). Acute rejection was independently associated with a lower 1-year eGFR (p = 0.028), but in the absence of rejection, GEGF and PEGF remained significantly different with regards to 1-year eGFR (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

SGF is not related to IGF but rather to DGF and should thus be regarded as a form of PEGF as opposed to GEGF. PEGF has a worse long-term outcome, and this indicates the need for increased efforts in its prevention and greater attention to its management.

Impact of early kidney resistance index on kidney graft and patient survival during a 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Resistance index (RI) measured by Doppler sonography during the early post-transplant period reflects interstitial oedema within the transplanted kidney. We have prospectively analysed the relationship between RI measured shortly after kidney transplantation (KTx), patient and graft survival, as well as kidney graft function during a 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

RI was measured at the second to fourth day after KTx in 364 consecutive patients, who were divided into tertiles, according to baseline RI value (Group 1: RI < 0.73, Group 2: RI between 0.73 and 0.85 and Group 3: RI > 0.85). The kidney graft function [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)] during the follow-up period was calculated according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula.

RESULTS

During the 5-year follow-up period, 23 patients died (2.6 versus 6.5 versus 9.6% in RI tertiles, respectively) and 59 lost their kidney graft (12.1 versus 17.7 versus 18.4%, respectively). Survival analyses showed that the effect of RI was significant for a combined outcome [graft loss or death; hazard ratio (HR) = 10.88] and in relation to death, it was of borderline significance (HR = 45.3, P = 0.09). The effect of delayed graft function (DGF) was only significant on graft loss (HR = 1.73). eGFR in the highest tertile was lower than in the lowest tertile during the entire follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

High RI values measured in segmental arteries in the very early post-transplant period predict worse kidney graft function and increased risk of all-cause graft loss, including patient death in the 5-year follow-up period. (ii) The predictive value of RI is not completely independent from the adverse influence of DGF on the premature graft loss.

Renovascular resistance of machine-perfused DCD kidneys is associated with primary nonfunction

Donation after cardiac death (DCD) has shown to be a valuable extension of the donor pool despite a higher percentage of primary nonfunction (PNF). Limiting the incidence of PNF is of vital importance. Renovascular resistance is believed to predict graft outcome; however the literature is inconsistent. Therefore, we studied whether renovascular resistance is associated with PNF and whether this parameter should be used to discard donor kidneys. All transplanted DCD kidneys preserved by machine perfusion at our center between 1993 and 2007 were analyzed (n = 440). The effects of renovascular resistance on PNF, delayed graft function (DGF), and graft and patient survival were examined using multivariable analyses; predictive quality by calculating the area under the curve (AUC). We showed that renovascular resistance at the start of machine perfusion was significantly and independently associated with PNF (OR 2.040, 95% CI 1.362-3.056; p = 0.001), and DGF (OR 2.345, 95% CI 1.110-4.955; p = 0.025). Predictive quality was moderate (0.609, 95% CI 0.538-0.681). Graft and patient survival were not associated with renovascular resistance. We conclude that renovascular resistance in DCD kidneys is an independent risk factor for PNF; however, the predictive value is relatively low.

Acute rejection and chronic nephropathy: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The risk of graft failure is the pivotal measure of effectiveness when evaluating immunosuppressive regimens for renal transplantation. However, to date most randomized trials of immunosuppressive therapy have had acute rejection as the primary endpoint for treatment comparisons. The objective here was to review the evidence relating acute rejection to renal graft function and graft survival.

METHODS

A systematic review of the published literature was undertaken. Studies were reviewed if they included the following: study populations of adults undergoing renal transplantation, endpoints of graft loss or survival, and quantitative data on the associations between acute rejection and graft function and survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 31 observational studies were included. The definition of acute rejection varied, and there was substantial heterogeneity in study design and methodology. In all but two studies, acute rejection was associated with an increased risk of graft loss-risk ratios ranged from 1.2 (no definition reported) to 10.5 (confirmed by biopsy and grade I Banff criteria). In addition, there was fairly strong evidence linking timing of acute rejection and graft survival and weaker evidence linking the number of episodes and graft survival. The heterogeneity between studies invalidated pooling of quantitative studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The weight of the evidence indicates that occurrence, timing, and number of acute rejection episodes are associated with increased risk of graft loss. Less is known about the severity of rejection, which is important because many immunosuppressive regimens lessen severity. Quantifying these relationships is a priority if acute rejection continues to be a surrogate trial endpoint.

Association between delayed graft function and allograft and patient survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication of renal transplantation. The short-term consequences of DGF are well known, but the long-term relationship between DGF and patient and graft survival is controversial in the published literature. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to precisely estimate these relationships.

METHODS

We performed a literature search for original studies published through March 2007 pertaining to long-term (>6 months) outcomes of DGF. The primary outcome was graft survival. Secondary outcomes were patient survival, acute rejection and kidney function.

RESULTS

When compared to patients without DGF, patients with DGF had a 41% increased risk of graft loss (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.27-1.56) at 3.2 years of follow-up. There was no significant relationship between DGF and patient survival at 5 years (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.94-1.39). The mean creatinine in the non-DGF group was 1.6 mg/dl. Patients with DGF had a higher mean serum creatinine (0.66 mg/dl, 95% CI 0.57-0.74) compared to patients without DGF at 3.5 years of follow-up. DGF was associated with a 38% relative increase in the risk of acute rejection (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.29-1.47).

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis emphasize and quantify the long-term detrimental association between DGF and important graft outcomes like graft survival, acute rejection and renal function. Efforts to prevent and treat DGF should be aggressively investigated in order to improve graft survival given the deficit in the number of kidney donors.

Randomized trial of single-dose versus divided-dose rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction in renal transplantation: an interim report

BACKGROUND

The optimal dosing protocol for rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction in renal transplantation has not been determined, but evidence exists that rATG infusion before renal allograft reperfusion improves early graft function. Infusing a large rATG dose over a short interval has not previously been evaluated for its effect on renal function and allograft nephropathy in a prospective, randomized comparison against conventional rATG induction.

METHODS

Between April 20, 2004 and December 26, 2007 we enrolled renal transplant patients into a prospective, randomized, nonblinded trial of two rATG dosing protocols (single dose, 6 mg/kg vs. divided doses, 1.5 mg/kg every other day x 4; target enrollment=160) followed after 6 months by calcineurin-inhibitor withdrawal. Primary endpoints are renal function by calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and chronic allograft nephropathy at protocol biopsy. We now present the early GFR data of all 160 patients and safety and efficacy data of the first 142 patients with 6 months follow up and before calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal (average follow up=23.3+/-11.6 months).

RESULTS

There were no differences between groups in rATG-related adverse events, patient and graft survival, acute rejection, or chronic allograft nephropathy rate at 6 months. Calculated DeltaGFR (POD 1-4) was significantly better in the single-dose group (P=0.02), with a trend toward improved renal function from months 2 to 6 in recipients of deceased donor kidneys (P=0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that administering 6 mg/kg of rATG over 24 hr is safe and is associated with improved early renal function compared with administering rATG in alternate-day doses.

Long-term renal outcomes after delayed graft function

Delayed graft function (DGF) describes dysfunction of the kidney allograft immediately after transplantation and is the most common complication in the immediate posttransplantation period. Although a standardized definition for DGF is lacking, it is most commonly defined as the need for dialysis within the first week after transplant. DGF is caused by a variety of factors related to the donor and recipient as well as organ procurement techniques. The occurrence of DGF affects both allograft and patient outcomes. In addition to prolonging hospital stay and increasing the costs associated with transplantation, DGF is associated with an increased incidence of acute rejection after transplantation and is associated with poorer long-term graft outcomes. Both immunologic and nonimmunologic mechanisms contribute to DGF. The risk factors for DGF that have been identified are reviewed as well as the impact of DGF on long-term outcomes.

Gene expression patterns in deceased donor kidneys developing delayed graft function after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation (KTx) ranges between 2% and 50%. The mechanisms leading to DGF deserve special interest because DGF exerts negative influences on long-term outcomes. We studied gene expression profiles in deceased donor kidney (DDK) biopsies with and without DGF.

METHODS

Gene expression profiling was performed on donor kidney tissues from 33 DDK with the use of microarrays. DDK were classified as grafts with immediate function (non-DGF; n=21) and grafts with DGF (n=12). DGF was defined as a dialysis requirement in the first week after transplantation. Demographic donor and recipient information was collected. The robust-multiarray average method was used to estimate probe set expression summaries. Logistic regression was used to identify genes significantly associated with DGF development.

RESULTS

Patients were followed for 3 months after KTx. Thirty-eight probe sets (n=36 genes) were univariably differentially expressed in DDK with DGF when compared with DDK with non-DGF (alpha=0.001). Sixty-nine probe sets (n=65 genes) were differentially expressed in DDK with DGF when compared with DDK with non-DGF after adjusting for cold ischemia time (alpha=0.001). Gene ontology terms classified the overexpressed genes in DDK with DGF as principally related to cell cycle/growth (e.g., IGFBP5, CSNK2A2), signal transduction (e.g., RASGRP3), immune response (e.g., CD83, BCL3, MX1), and metabolism (e.g., ENPP4, GBA3). TNFRSF1B was overexpressed in DDK with DGF.

CONCLUSIONS

Cold ischemia time was a predictor of DGF independently of the preservation method. We identified a set of 36 genes candidates of DGF in DDK, with genes involved in the inflammatory response being the more important.

Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The term delayed graft function (DGF) is commonly used to describe the need for dialysis after receiving a kidney transplant. DGF increases morbidity after transplantation, prolongs hospitalization and may lead to premature graft failure. Various definitions of DGF are used in the literature without a uniformly accepted technique to identify DGF.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify all of the different definitions and diagnostic techniques to identify DGF.

RESULTS

We identified 18 unique definitions for DGF and 10 diagnostic techniques to identify DGF.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of heterogeneous clinical criteria to define DGF has certain limitations. It will lead to delayed and sometimes inaccurate diagnosis of DGF. Hence a diagnostic test that identifies DGF reliably and early is necessary. Heterogeneity, in the definitions used for DGF, hinders the evolution of a diagnostic technique to identify DGF, which requires a gold standard definition. We are in need of a new definition that is uniformly accepted across the kidney transplant community. The new definition will be helpful in promoting better communication among transplant professionals and aids in comparing clinical studies of diagnostic techniques to identify DGF and thus may facilitate clinical trials of interventions for the treatment of DGF.

Non heart-beating donors in England

When transplantation started all organs were retrieved from patients immediately after cardio-respiratory arrest, i.e. from non heart-beating donors. After the recognition that death resulted from irreversible damage to the brainstem, organ retrieval rapidly switched to patients certified dead after brainstem testing. These heart-beating-donors have become the principal source of organs for transplantation for the last 30 years. The number of heart-beating-donors are declining and this is likely to continue, therefore cadaveric organs from non-heart-beating donor offers a large potential of resources for organ transplantation. The aim of this study is to examine clinical outcomes of non-heart-beating donors in the past 10 years in the UK as an way of decreasing pressure in the huge waiting list for organs transplantation.

Reduction of ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat kidney by FTY720, a synthetic derivative of sphingosine

BACKGROUND

The current shortage of organ donors has led many centers to use marginal and nonheart-beating donors (NHBDs). Recent research has implicated the infiltration of lymphocytes as an important mediator of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). FTY720 is an immunosuppressant that promotes lymphocyte sequestration into lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to examine the potential for FTY720 to abrogate IRI when subjected to increasing ischemic times.

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent bilateral flank incision with removal of the right kidney and clamping of the left hilum. Groups were divided into ischemia times of 45, 55, and 65min; each group was further divided into a control group (IRI only), IRI+FTY720 (1 mg/kg/d), and IRI+cyclosporine (15 mg/kg/d), n=4 per group.

RESULTS

Thre days after 45 min of ischemia, serum creatinine in the ischemia only (477+/-37 micromol/L) and cyclosporine groups (698+/-32 micromol/L) was significantly increased compared with the FTY720-treated animals (194+/-66 micromol/L). The beneficial effect of FTY720 was also observed at 55 and 65 min; indeed, FTY720-treated animals demonstrated signs of recovery from 65 min of ischemia whereas control and cyclosporine-treated animals required sacrifice between days 3 and 5. Treatment with FTY720 reduced renal damage assessed histologically and also reduced apoptosis and increased cell proliferation.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with FTY720 reduced IRI and prevented unrecoverable acute renal failure after significant ischemic injury. This study suggests that FTY720 may help improve the quality of grafts from NHBD and marginal donors by abrogating the IRI insult.

Outcomes after transplantation of deceased-donor kidneys with rising serum creatinine

The increasing number of candidates for kidney transplantation and relatively unchanged deceased-donor pool has led to expansion in the criteria for donor acceptability. Outcomes of kidneys from donors with progressively rising creatinine values have not been reported. Patients transplanted between September 2003 and August 2006 with kidneys from donors with peak creatinine levels >2.0 mg/dL were stratified into two groups based on the terminal creatinine and evaluated for outcome: (1) falling creatinine (FC)(n= 27), terminal creatinine at least 0.2mg/dL less than peak, and (2) rising creatinine (RC)(n=24), terminal creatinine = peak. The mean terminal creatinine was significantly higher in the RC group (3.2 +/- 1.3 mg/dL) compared to the FC group (1.9 +/- 0.9 mg/dL)(p<0.0001). Peak creatinine values were similar (RC, 3.2 +/- 1.3; FC, 3.1 +/- 1.3; p=0.6521) between the two groups. Rates of delayed graft function (RC, 24%; FC 32%; p=0.7881) and mean creatinine at follow-up (RC, 1.6 +/- 0.6, FC 1.6 +/- 0.4; p=0.3533) were not significantly different. With a mean follow-up of 287 +/- 274 days, allograft survival was 92% in the RC recipients and 89% in the FC recipients. Under certain conditions, kidneys from donors with rising serum creatinine can be used safely with reasonable early outcomes.

Genomewide expression profiles of rat model renal isografts from brain dead donors

BACKGROUND

It has been well documented that two factors, brain death (BD) and ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, have distinct but overlapping adverse influences on the clinical outcome of renal transplantation.

METHOD

We previously established a rat model of renal isografting from brain dead donors. In the present study, we performed genomic expression profiling with a high-density oligonucleotide microarray to identify genes that were upregulated or downregulated by BD and/or I/R injury.

RESULTS

Among a total of 20,550 genes, most of those upregulated by BD were genes for adhesion molecules and cytokines or for chemokines such as Gro1 and IP-10. When overexpression of these genes was assessed by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, it was only observed one hr after the engraftment of kidneys from BD donors and returned to baseline thereafter, indicating the presence of an acute systemic inflammatory response to BD. Analysis of biologic networks demonstrated the activation of specific pathways that were clearly different for BD and I/R injury. The p53 and NFkappaB pathway was involved in the acute response to BD, whereas the Myc, Jun, and c-fos pathway was involved in I/R injury. Investigation of secretory protein genes identified LCN2 and SPP1 as candidate genes for biologic markers.

CONCLUSION

Because our experimental system is a good model of renal transplantation from brain dead or living human donors, our data may be useful for elucidating the pathologic processes involved and for identification of novel markers for graft dysfunction of renal transplantation.

Donor age intensifies the early immune response after transplantation

Increasing donor age is associated with reduced graft function. We wondered if donor age may not only affect intrinsic function but also alter the immune response of the recipient. Kidneys from young and old F-344 rats (3 vs 18 months) were transplanted into bilaterally nephrectomized young Lewis recipients and compared with age-matched controls (follow-up: 6 months). Renal function and structural changes were assessed serially in both native kidneys and allografts. Host alloreactivity, graft-infiltrating cells, and their inflammatory products were determined at intervals to examine the correlation of immune response and donor age. Functional and structural deterioration had advanced significantly in older allografts compared with age-matched native controls, whereas differences between young allografts and native controls of similar age were only minor. Changes in grafts from elderly rats were associated with a more intense host immune response early post-transplant (up to 1 month) reflected by significantly higher numbers of peripheral T and B cells, increased T-cell alloreactivity and modified cytokine patterns associated with elevated frequencies of intragraft dendritic cells, B cells, and CD31+ cells. By 6 months, recipients of young donor grafts produced comparable or more intense alloantigen-specific immune responses. Older donor grafts elicit a stronger immune response in the early period after transplantation.

Cold ischemia time and allograft outcomes in live donor renal transplantation: is live donor organ transport feasible?

One of the greatest obstacles to the implementation of regional or national kidney paired donation programs (KPD) is the need for the donor to travel to their matched recipient's hospital. While transport of the kidney is an attractive alternative, there is concern that prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) would diminish the benefits of live donor transplantation (LDTx). To examine the impact of increased CIT in LDTx, 1-year serum creatinine (SCr), delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR) and allograft survival (AS) were analyzed in 38 467 patients by 2 h CIT groups (0-2, 2-4, 4-6 and 6-8 h) using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (UNOS/OPTN). Adjusted probabilities of DGF and AR were estimated in multivariate logistic regression models and AS was examined in multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Although some increase in DGF was observed between the 0-2 h (4.7%) and 4-6 h (8.3%) groups, prolonged CIT did not result in inferior SCr, increased AR or compromised AS in any group with >2 h CIT compared with the 0-2 h group. Comparable long-term outcomes for these grafts suggests that transport of live donor organs may be a feasible alternative to donor travel in KPD regions where CIT can be limited to 8 h.

Association of HLA class I antigen matching and early graft outcome in living donor kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

HLA antigen matching often plays an important role in organ transplantation. As for HLA class I antigen matching, there are differences of opinion regarding its influence on the outcome of renal transplantations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of HLA class I antigen matching with early graft outcomes in living donor kidney transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated graft outcomes in the first month of transplantation. Major events were slow graft function (serum creatinine > 250 micromol/L at the end of first week), delayed graft function (patients requiring dialysis in first week), and acute rejection episode. Graft outcomes were compared for normal renal function (NRF, serum creatinine < or = 175 micromol/L) impaired renal function (IRF, serum creatinine > 175 micromol/L) or impaired graft function due to an acute rejection episode (IGF).

RESULTS

The 115 subjects had a mean age of 29 +/- 8 years and their donors 38 +/- 11 years (P < .01). Immunosuppression included prednisolone, azathioprine, and cyclosporine. Parents, siblings, and others were kidney donors in 46%, 33%, and 21%, respectively. Comparisons between NRF/IRF (serum creatinine 133 +/- 24 vs 201 +/- 36 micromol/L, P < .01) and NGF/IGF (serum creatinine 146 +/- 44 vs 161 +/- 39 micromol/L, P < .05) showed no difference in number or pattern of HLA matching.

CONCLUSION

HLA class I antigen matching may not produce an added influence on early graft outcome among living donor kidney transplantations.