The effect of venous drainage on glucose homeostasis after experimental pancreas transplantation

A Simplified Technique of Pancreas Transplantation in a Porcine Model

Background: The incidence of diabetes has been steadily increasing. The only curative option for diabetes is pancreas transplantation (PTx). Porcine models are valuable because of their anatomical and physiological similarities to human beings. Our aim is to introduce a simplified technique of PTx in a porcine model. Methods: In Landrace pigs (n = 32), after median laparotomy, the pancreas was mobilized, and the portal and splenic veins were divided. The proper hepatic and splenic arteries and the bile duct were also prepared, and the duodenal bulb was prepared and stapled. The third portion of the duodenum was freed up to the ligament of Treitz and stapled, and the renal arteries were ligated. After systemic heparinization, the pancreas was perfused through the abdominal aorta with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution. The portal and splenic veins were cut for evaluating the sufficiency of perfusion. Whole pancreaticoduodenal graft was procured along with an aortic jump graft containing mesenteric and celiac trunks. In recipients, after total pancreatectomy, the suprarenal inferior vena cava and infrarenal aorta were prepared for vascular anastomosis in an end-to-side manner. After pancreas reperfusion, duodenoduodenostomy was performed in an end-to-side manner. Results: Median cold and warm ischemia times were 10 h (range, 9-14 h) and 50 min (range, 35-80 min), respectively. The hemodynamic status was stable throughout the operation. The median follow-up period was 7 days (range, 4-10). There were no major intra- and postoperative complications. Conclusion: By using an aortic jump graft, there was no need to perform additional arterial reconstruction resulting in a short warm ischemic and operation time. End-to-side portocaval and duodenoduodenal anastomoses make this model of PTx a very feasible method for experimental evaluations.

Evolution of pancreas transplant surgery

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is a chronic condition often leading to disabling complications including retinopathy, neuropathy and cardiovascular disease which can be modified by intensive treatment with insulin. Such treatment, however, is associated with a restrictive lifestyle and risk of hypoglycaemic morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

This review examines the role of pancreas transplantation in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

Pancreas transplantation is currently the only proven option to achieve long-term insulin independence, resulting in an improvement or stabilization of those diabetic related complications. The hazards of pancreas transplantation as a major operation are well known. Balancing the risks of a surgical procedure, with the benefits of restoring normoglycaemia remains an important task for the pancreas transplant surgeon. Pancreas transplantation is not an emergency operation to treat poorly managed and non-compliant patients with debilitating complications. It is a highly specialized procedure which has evolved both in terms of the surgical technique, patient selection and assessment.

CONCLUSION

Pancreas transplantation has emerged as the single most effective way to achieve normal glucose homeostasis in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant rejection: separate or synchronous events?

The results of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) cannot be matched by pancreas transplantation alone (PTA), in part because an independent diagnosis of pancreas graft rejection remains difficult. The relationship between rejection of the pancreas and rejection of the kidney is poorly understood, and it is not known whether simultaneous transplantation of both organs confers true protection to either graft. To study these questions, reliable canine allotransplant models of kidney transplantation alone (KTA), PTA, and SPK were established. Sixty-seven mongrel dogs received KTA (n=21), PTA (n=23), or SPK (n=23) with either no immunosuppression, low-dose cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppression, or high-dose CsA-based immunosuppression. Needle core biopsy (NCB) and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) were performed at 0, 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 14, 21, and 30 days or at the time of graft failure. Pancreas and kidney graft survival after SPK was significantly shorter in dogs given low-dose CsA than in dogs given high-dose CsA (pancreas, P<0.04; kidney, P<0.03). Concurrent NCBs and FNABs were performed on 227 occasions in pancreas grafts and 229 occasions in kidney grafts. The time to initial evidence of rejection by NCB was not different in any immunosuppressed group. Synchronous rejection occurred in 73% of immunosuppressed SPK biopsies. Kidney-only rejection occurred in 23% of biopsies and pancreas-only rejection occurred in only 3% after SPK. All markers of pancreas graft rejection were poor, with the most sensitive being NCB of the simultaneously transplanted kidney. In summary, recipients of SPK required more immunosuppression than recipients of PTA, and improved PTA survival should be achievable with more sensitive markers of rejection. Markers of kidney rejection were the most sensitive indicators of pancreas rejection, and independent pancreas rejection was uncommon after SPK.