Use of liver allografts from carbon monoxide poisoned cadaveric donors

Successful Liver Transplantation from a Deceased Donor After Ethylene Glycol Ingestion: A Case Report and Review of the Literature of Organ Donation from Poisoned Donors

Despite the increase in deceased organ donation over the past ten years, the gap between patients awaiting transplant and available organs continues to widen. Deceased donors secondary to acute fatal poisonings represent less than 1% of all organ donors. Organs from poisoned donors have largely been discarded due to concerns of toxin transmission and poor organ function as well as the paucity of data that exists regarding this donor population. Here, we report a case of a 40-year-old male who underwent successful liver re-transplantation from a donor who died following ethylene glycol ingestion. To our knowledge this case report is the first to describe successful re-transplantation from an ethylene glycol-poisoned donor. We also provide a comprehensive review of the literature describing organ donation from poisoned donors.

Can carbon monoxide-poisoned victims be organ donors?

The increasing demand for organ allografts to treat end-stage organ failure has driven changes in traditional donor criteria. Patients who have succumbed to carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning, a common cause of toxicological mortality, are usually rejected as organ donors. To fulfill the increasing demand, selection criteria must be expanded to include CO-poisoned donors. However, the use of allografts exposed to high CO concentrations is still under debate. Basic research and literature review data suggest that patients with brain death caused by CO poisoning should be considered appropriate organ donors. Accepting organs from CO-poisoned victims could increase the number of potential donors and lower the death rate of patients on the waiting lists. This review and reported cases may increase awareness among emergency department physicians, as well as transplant teams, that patients dying of CO exposure may be acceptable organ donors.

Use of carbon monoxide in minimizing ischemia/reperfusion injury in transplantation

Although carbon monoxide (CO) is known to be toxic because of its ability to interfere with oxygen delivery at high concentrations, mammalian cells endogenously generate CO primarily via the catalysis of heme by heme oxygenases. Recent findings have indicated that heme oxygenases and generation of CO serve as a key mechanism to maintain the integrity of the physiological function of organs and supported the development of a new paradigm that CO, at low concentrations, functions as a signaling molecule in the body and exerts significant cytoprotection. Consequently, exogenously delivered CO has been shown to mediate potent protection in various injury models through its anti-inflammatory, vasodilating, and antiapoptotic functions. Ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury associated with organ transplantation is one of the major deleterious factors limiting the success of transplantation. Ischemia/reperfusion injury is a complex cascade of interconnected events involving cell damage, apoptosis, vigorous inflammatory responses, microcirculation disturbance, and thrombogenesis. Carbon monoxide has a great potential in minimizing I/R injury. This review will provide an overview of the basic physiology of CO, preclinical studies examining efficacy of CO in I/R injury models, and possible protective mechanisms. Carbon monoxide could be developed to be a valuable therapeutic molecule in minimizing I/R injury in transplantation.

Solid organ procurement from donors with carbon monoxide poisoning and/or burn--a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, carbon monoxide poisoning and/or burn are considered contraindications to organ procurement. Previously reported cases have shown mixed results and many have been redundantly reported in the literature.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of all reported cases of organ transplantation procured from donors with carbon monoxide poisoning and/or burn to investigate whether these patients are suitable donors for solid organ transplantations.

RESULTS

Organ survival rates of reported organs were high (86%). All organs procured from donors with carbon monoxide poisoning and burn survived during follow-up. Mean donors' peak carbon monoxide levels were comparable for organs surviving or failing during follow-up (31 ± 2.7 vs. 29 ± 26.8; p=0.95). Eighty-seven per cent of organs procured from donors supported with inotropes or vasopressors prior to organ procurement and 91% of organs procured from donors who were cardiopulmonary resuscitated prior to organ procurement survived during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Burn, carbon monoxide poisoning, high peak carbon monoxide-levels, use of inotropes or vasopressors or cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to procurement are not contraindications for organ procurement and transplantation. New guidelines for burn units defining the special requirements for organ procurement from donors with carbon monoxide poisoning and/or burn are needed to raise the awareness for potential organ donors and to ultimately increase the donor pool and save patients' lives.

Prélèvements d’organes après intoxication

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing gap between the number of patients on the waiting list and the number of transplanted patients. In France, more than 10000 patients waited for an organ transplantation in 2002. Due to the graft shortage, "marginal" donors are now considered. The patients who present brain death after accidental or voluntary poisoning belong to this category.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

The data available from European or North American organ procurement organisations show that poisoned donors represent about 1% of all organ donors. It seems likely that a significant number of poisoned patients are not referred because poisoning is regarded as a contraindication to organ donation. When organ procurement can be achieved, the results expressed as recipient survival or graft survival are quite encouraging.

TOXIC PRODUCTS

The most frequently involved toxins are either drugs (psychotropic agents, analgesics...), illicit substances, or environmental agents (gases, alcohols...). The literature data are discussed; some issues remain controversial.

PRACTICAL APPROACH

Several criteria have to be applied when poisoned patients are considered as potential organ donors. Besides a firm diagnosis of "brain death", the knowledge of the "target organs" of poisoning is of paramount importance, together with careful analysis of the toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics. In most cases, routine biological and morphological data are sufficient to assess graft function.

The impact of donor chemical overdose on the outcome of liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

To overcome the critical shortage of liver grafts, many centers have been widening the acceptance criteria for liver donation. Use of liver grafts from victims who have suffered chemical overdose (COD) may be one option that could help to expand the donor pool. However, this practice has been poorly documented.

METHODS

Of 1,195 orthotopic liver transplantations performed at our institution between June 1994 and March 2001, 22 involved livers (1.8%) were retrieved from COD donors. Donor and recipient characteristics and posttransplantation outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The main chemicals causing brain death of the donor were carbon monoxide (n=4), cocaine (n=4), tricyclic antidepressants (n=3), 3,4-methylenedioxy- methamphetamine (n=2), opiates (n=2), aspirin (n=1), gamma hydroxybutyrate (n=1), heroin (n=1), insulin (n=1), verapamil (n=1), barbiturate (n=1), and brompheniramine/phenylpropanolamine (n=1). Primary nonfunction developed in one patient who had received a liver from an 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-intoxicated donor. Another patient died of fungal meningitis 10 days after transplantation with a functioning graft. The remaining 20 patients experienced acceptable early graft function, as demonstrated by initial mean peak values of bilirubin (4.8 mg/dL), aspartate aminotransferase (624 U/L), and alanine aminotransferase (730 U/L). One-year graft survival rate estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method was 86%.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfactory outcomes of graft function were achieved in orthotopic liver transplantations from COD donors. The cautious use of liver grafts from selected COD donors may be a worthwhile method of increasing the availability of scarce donor organs.

Poisoned patients as potential organ donors: postal survey of transplant centres and intensive care units

BACKGROUND

The number of patients awaiting allograft transplantation in the UK exceeds the number of organs offered for transplantation each year. Most organ donors tend to be young, fit and healthy individuals who die because of trauma or sudden cardiac arrest. Patients who die from drug and poison intoxication tend to have similar characteristics but are less frequently offered as potential organ donors.

METHODS

A postal questionnaire survey of all transplantation centres and an equal number of intensive care units in the UK was undertaken. The use of kidney, heart, lung, liver and pancreas transplants from poisoned patients following deliberate methanol ingestion, cardiac arrest presumed secondary to cocaine overdose, accidental domestic carbon monoxide inhalation and industrial cyanide exposure were used as case scenarios.

RESULTS

Response rates were 70% for transplantation centres and 50% for intensive care unit directors. Over 80% of organs would be offered or discussed with transplant coordinators by intensive care unit directors. Transplantation physicians/surgeons would consider transplanting organs in up to 100% of case scenarios, depending on the organ and poisoning or intoxication involved.

DISCUSSION

The postal survey presented here shows that most transplantation physicians and surgeons and intensive care unit directors would consider those who die following acute drug intoxication and poisoning as potential organ donors. The previously reported literature shows in general that transplanted organs from poisoned patients have good long-term survival, although the number of reports is small. Poisoned patients are another pool of organ donors who at present are probably underused by transplantation services.