Pharmacokinetics of an oral solution of the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine in maintenance pediatric liver transplant recipients

Development of a Pediatric Relative Bioavailability/Bioequivalence Database and Identification of Putative Risk Factors Associated With Evaluation of Pediatric Oral Products

Generally, bioequivalence (BE) studies of drug products for pediatric patients are conducted in adults due to ethical reasons. Given the lack of direct BE assessment in pediatric populations, the aim of this work is to develop a database of BE and relative bioavailability (relative BA) studies conducted in pediatric populations and to enable the identification of risk factors associated with certain drug substances or products that may lead to failed BE or different pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters in relative BA studies in pediatrics. A literature search from 1965 to 2020 was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify BE studies conducted in pediatric populations and relative BA studies conducted in pediatric populations. Overall, 79 studies covering 37 active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) were included in the database: 4 bioequivalence studies with data that passed BE evaluations; 2 studies showed bioinequivalence results; 34 relative BA studies showing comparable PK parameters, and 39 relative BA studies showing differences in PK parameters between test and reference products. Based on the above studies, common putative risk factors associated with differences in relative bioavailability (DRBA) in pediatric populations include age-related absorption effects, high inter-individual variability, and poor study design. A database containing 79 clinical studies on BE or relative BA in pediatrics has been developed. Putative risk factors associated with DRBA in pediatric populations are summarized.

Cyclosporine: A Commentary on Brand versus Generic Formulation Exchange

The evidence for conversion from brand name to generic equivalent cyclosporine is conflicting. Cyclosporine is a narrow therapeutic-range drug for which small variations in exposure may have severe clinical consequences for transplant patients. There is currently a lack of comparative outcome data relating to the pharmacokinetics of the reference formulation, Neoral, and generic formulations in transplant recipients. A major common concern is the potential inability to attain similar trough levels, an issue that can be easily corrected by ongoing therapeutic drug monitoring to ensure that the new steady state falls within an intended target range. Prospective clinical studies investigating the efficacy and safety of generic formulations in both de novo and long-term transplant patients are also awaited. Until further evidence is available on the conversion of transplant patients to or between generic formulations of cyclosporine, any transfer to a different cyclosporine formulation should be undertaken with close supervision. The best available information to date, however, does not support the frequently held but unsubstantiated belief that generic preparations of immunosuppressive drugs are not as effective as brand names or that conversion from brand to generic is associated with significant danger. This paper attempts to initiate a discussion of these issues.

Management and clinical outcome of penetrating keratoplasty for long-term corneal changes in sympathetic ophthalmia

Purpose. To report the visual outcome of penetrating keratoplasty performed on the sympathizing eye in three cases of sympathetic ophthalmitis. Methods. Interventional case series of three patients, diagnosed with sympathetic ophthalmitis, with corneal changes in the form of band keratopathy and decompensation underwent penetrating keratoplasty to the sympathizing eye. They had each sustained penetrating trauma as a child and had undergone previous cataract surgery and superficial keratectomy. Two patients had undergone lamellar keratoplasty prior to this procedure. One patient had undergone trabeculectomy for glaucoma, and she was on antiglaucoma medication. The preoperative visual acuity was 1/60 in the affected eye of each patient. Penetrating keratoplasty was performed in the sympathizing eye and the donor graft size was 7.50 mm, and the host graft size was 7.25 mm. Our patients were immunosuppressed prior to the procedure to help prevent graft rejection. Result. At one year follow-up, a BCVA of 6/36 or better was achieved in all three patients. Postoperative examination of the fundus showed peripheral chorioretinal atrophy with pigmentary changes at the macula, accounting for the limited vision. The grafts remain clear to date, and there has been no recurrence of uveitis or rejection. Conclusion. Penetrating keratoplasty can be considered as a surgical option to restore useful vision in a stable sympathizing eye in sympathetic ophthalmitis, and this depends on the extent of the pathology. However, these cases require treatment with immunosuppressives to prevent graft rejection and to prolong graft survival.

Pharmacology of calcineurin antagonists

Cyclosporine and tacrolimus share the same pharmacodynamic property of activated T-cell suppression via inhibition of calcineurin. The introduction of these drugs to the immunosuppressive repertoire of transplant management has greatly improved the outcomes in organ transplantation and constitutes arguably one of the major breakthroughs in modern medicine. To this date, calcineurin inhibitors are the mainstay of prevention of allograft rejection. The experience gained from the laboratory and clinical use of cyclosporine and tacrolimus has greatly advanced our knowledge about the nature of many aspects of immune response. However, the clinical practice still struggles with the shortcomings of these drugs: the significant inter- and intraindividual variability of their pharmacokinetics, the unpredictability of their pharmacodynamic effects, as well as complexity of interactions with other agents in transplant recipients. This article briefly reviews the pharmacological aspects of calcineurin antagonists as they relate to the mode of action and pharmacokinetics as well as drug interactions and monitoring.

Current status of liver transplantation in children

There are two critical issues on opposite ends of the timeline for patients who are eligible for liver transplantation. On the one hand, the crisis in the cadaveric organ supply makes surviving to transplant ever more risky. On the other hand, patients who receive successful transplants face the consequences of long-term immunosuppression and its potentially life-threatening complications. The donor shortage is forcing difficult decisions that affect all patients who await liver transplantation. It is important to scrutinize carefully the results of all policies that govern allocation and the ethics of the solutions we advocate to ensure that no patient subgroup is being at a disadvantage. Current immunosuppression practices are being challenged by an increasing understanding of the immunologic events triggered by the allograft and the goal to free patients from consequences of a lifetime of immunosuppression. Clinicians can expect, and perhaps require, that new immunosuppressive protocols will address how the planned intervention might be expected to advance the understanding of tolerance mechanisms. As knowledge increases, clinicians can anticipate innovative new immunosuppressive proposals. Calcineurin and steroid-free induction, the use of donor-derived bone marrow infusion, recipient pretreatment, costimulatory blockade, and new antibody induction approaches are all being proposed--often in combination--for clinical trials. Researchers face additional challenges in defining endpoints if the goal is not just the short-term reduction in rejection but the minimization, and eventual discontinuation, of immunosuppressive drugs while maintaining excellent long-term graft function. How much "failure" will be accepted and how will it be defined? How will clinicians interpret liver biopsies if they begin to accept that some lymphocytic infiltrates may be beneficial mediators of the ongoing immune activation necessary for the maintenance of tolerance? How will they adjust immunosuppression practices to the dynamic processes in the immune response that maintain tolerance? Remarkable short-term successes in providing transplants for thousands of children with liver failure have brought these challenges into sharp focus. Clinicians must seek to move the life-giving science of transplantation toward a new goal: providing long lifetimes of excellent graft function with minimal toxicity from immunosuppressive drugs and the hope of freedom from immunosuppression altogether. Pediatric liver recipients, whose grafts have inherent tolerogenic potential and for whom we can anticipate decades of life after transplant, may prove to be an ideal study population to further these goals.

A pharmacokinetic and clinical review of the potential clinical impact of using different formulations of cyclosporin A. Berlin, Germany, November 19, 2001

A meeting of 14 transplant and pharmacokinetic specialists from Europe and North America was convened in November 2001 to evaluate scientific and clinical data regarding the use of different formulations of cyclosporin A (CsA). The following consensus was achieved. (1) CsA is a critical-dose drug with a narrow therapeutic window. Clinical outcomes after transplantation are affected by the pharmacokinetic properties of CsA, particularly by its bioavailability, and by intrapatient variability in CsA exposure. (2) Standard bioequivalence criteria do not address differences in CsA pharmacokinetics between transplant recipients and healthy volunteers, or between subpopulations of transplant recipients. (3) In some circumstances, currently available formulations of CsA that meet standard bioequivalence criteria are likely to be nonequivalent with respect to pharmacokinetic characteristics. (4) The choice of CsA formulation can affect the short- and long-term clinical outcome. Currently, there is a lack of clinical comparisons between generic CsA formulations and the Neoral formulation (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey). Initial retrospective data from the Collaborative Transplant Study suggest that use of generic CsA formulations may result in reduced graft survival at 1 year. (5) Management of transplant recipients by monitoring Neoral concentrations 2 hours after dosing (C(2)) reduces the incidence and severity of acute rejection compared with monitoring of trough concentrations with no increase in toxicity. C(2) monitoring has been developed based on the pharmacokinetics of Neoral only and has not been evaluated or validated for generic formulations of CsA. (6) The major costs of care after transplantation relate to the management of poor clinical outcomes and toxicity. CsA formulations with different pharmacokinetic properties may be associated with varying clinical outcomes, which would be expected to affect total health care costs. (7) The transplant physician is responsible for selecting immunosuppressive agents and formulations for his or her patients. Any switch between CsA formulations in a particular patient should take place only in a controlled setting with adequate pharmacokinetic monitoring.

Neoral monitoring 2 hours post-dose and the pediatric transplant patient

Cyclosporin A therapy has evolved greatly over the past 25 years of clinical experience. Sophisticated studies of CsA pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics have led to a better understanding of the relationship between dose response and biological effect. It has become apparent that achieving target drug exposure is necessary for optimal clinical outcomes. Monitoring dose response has become a key aspect of immunosuppressive management. This review presents the information available supporting cyclosporin drug concentration drawn two hours post dose (C-2) in children who have been transplanted as the best single indicator of CsA exposure. Further studies evaluating the clinical benefit of achieving C-2 targets in children are indicated.

Immunosuppressive therapy for paediatric transplant patients: pharmacokinetic considerations

Immunosuppressive therapy in paediatric transplant recipients is changing as a consequence of the increasing number of available immunosuppressive agents. Generic and other new formulations are now emerging onto the market, clinical experience is growing, and it is expected that clinicians should tailor immunosuppressive protocols to individual patients by optimising dosages and drugs according to the maturation and clinical status of the child. Most information about the clinical pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs in paediatrics is centred on cyclosporin, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal and liver transplant recipients; data regarding other immunosuppressants and transplant types are limited. Although the clinical pharmacokinetics of these drugs in paediatric transplant recipients are still under investigation, it is evident that the pharmacokinetic parameters observed in adults may not be applicable to children, especially in younger age groups. In general, patients younger than 5 years old show higher clearance rates irrespective of the organ transplanted or drug used. Another important factor that frequently affects clearance in this patient population is the post-transplant time. In accordance with these findings, and in contrast with the usual under-dosage in children, the need for higher dosages in younger recipients and during the early post-transplant period seems evident. To achieve the best compromise between prevention of rejection and toxicity, dosage individualisation is required and this can be achieved through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This approach is particularly useful to ensure the cost-effective management of paediatric transplant recipients in whom the pharmacokinetic behaviour, target concentrations for clinical use and optimal dosage strategies of a particular drug may not yet be well defined. Although TDM may be a tool for improving immunosuppressive therapy, there is little information concerning its positive contribution to clinical events, including outcomes, for paediatric patients. Substantial information to support the use of TDM exists for cyclosporin and, to a lesser extent, for tacrolimus, but a diversity of options affects their implementation in the clinical setting. The role of TDM in therapy with mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus has yet to be defined regarding both methods and clinical indications. Pharmacodynamic monitoring appears more suited to other immunosuppressants such as azathioprine, corticosteroids and monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies. If coupled with pharmacokinetic measurements, such monitoring would allow earlier and more precise optimisation of therapy. Very few population pharmacokinetic studies have been carried out in paediatric transplant patients. This type of study is needed so that techniques such as Bayesian forecasting can be applied to optimise immunosuppressive therapy in paediatric transplant patients.

Effect of grapefruit juice on cyclosporin A pharmacokinetics in pediatric renal transplant patients

Cyclosporin A (CsA) is an important immunosuppressant that is prone to numerous drug interactions. Grapefruit juice has been investigated, as a possible adjunct to CsA dosing in adult renal transplant recipients, to decrease CsA metabolism and reduce dosages. This study investigated this combination in pediatric renal transplant patients. Six stable pediatric renal transplant patients were entered into an open-label, four-period cross-over study in which patients were given their current CsA dose as either an oral solution (CsA-Sol) or a microemulsion (CsA-ME). In addition, drugs were administered concurrently with water or grapefruit juice. Steady-state pharmacokinetic profiles were taken during each of the four periods. Following the concurrent administration of grapefruit juice, CsA whole-blood 12-h trough levels were significantly increased during CsA-Sol dosing. Furthermore, the CsA elimination rate constant was significantly reduced during the same period. After CsA-ME dosing, no differences in CsA pharmacokinetics were found between concurrent water or grapefruit ingestion. Grapefruit juice co-administration reduced the production of CsA metabolites, AM1 and AM9, during CsA-Sol dosing. No changes in CsA metabolite production were found when patients were given CsA-ME with grapefruit juice as compared with water. Hence, alterations in CsA absorption and elimination occur with concurrent grapefruit juice ingestion when stable pediatric renal transplant patients are taking the oral CsA solution, but not the microemulsion formulation. These changes may be mediated by alterations in intestinal or hepatic metabolism, or drug absorption. The effect of grapefruit juice on CsA absorption is not readily predictable in these patients.

Review of select transplant subpopulations at high risk of failure from standard immunosuppressive therapy

Despite improvements in short-term graft and patient survival rates for solid organ transplants, certain subgroups of transplant recipients experience poorer clinical outcome compared to the general population. Groups including pediatrics, African-Americans, diabetics, cystic fibrosis patients, and pregnant women require special considerations when designing immunosuppressive regimens that optimize transplant outcomes. Problems specific to pediatric transplant recipients include altered pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs, such as cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus (poor absorption, increased metabolism, rapid clearance), the need to restore growth post-transplantation, and a high incidence of drug-related adverse effects. African-Americans have decreased drug absorption and bioavailability, high immunologic responsiveness, and a high incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus. Diabetics and cystic fibrosis patients exhibit poor absorption of immunosuppressive agents, which may lead to underimmunosuppression and subsequent graft rejection. Pregnant women undergo physiologic changes that can alter the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressives, thus requiring careful clinical management to minimize the risks of either under- or overimmunosuppression to mother and child. To achieve an optimal post-transplant outcome in these high-risk patients, the problems specific to each group must be addressed, and immunosuppressive therapy individualized accordingly. Drug formulation greatly impacts upon pharmacokinetics and the resultant level of immunosuppression. Thus, a formulation with improved absorption (e.g., CsA for microemulsion), higher bioavailability, and less pharmacokinetic variability may facilitate patient management and lead to more favorable outcomes, especially in groups demonstrating low and variable bioavailability. Other strategies aimed at improving transplant outcome include the use of higher immunosuppressive doses, different combinations of immunosuppressive agents, more frequent monitoring, and management of concurrent disease states.

Neoral use in the pediatric transplant recipient

This review and critical analysis of current trends of immunosuppression management in pediatric transplantation provides evidence and support for the continued role of Neoral as an indispensable part of immunosuppressive protocols. CyA formulation influences clinical outcomes such as acute rejection, as confirmed by two studies. The CyA microemulsion formulation provides more reliable and effective absorption. An advanced TDM strategy to determine CyA bioavailability can improve the effectiveness and safety of immunosuppression in de novo liver transplant patients. especially in the younger de novo patient. Neoral is an indispensable part of combination protocols in pediatric transplantation.

NOF-11: a one-year pediatric randomized double-blind comparison of neoral versus sandimmune in orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although cyclosporine (CsA) has been a mainstay in liver transplantation immunosuppression the original formulation [Sandimmune (SIM)] has variable absorption, particularly in children. Neoral is a new formulation of CsA that may have improved biovailability that would be advantageous in children. This study was undertaken to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and effects on outcome of Neoral versus Sandimmune (SIM) in primary pediatric liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients were randomized to receive Neoral (17 patients) or SIM (15 patients) in the early posttransplant period (days 1-7) in a double-blind fashion. Intravenous CsA was instituted immediately posttransplant followed by Neoral or SIM as soon as the patient was tolerating oral fluids (days 1-7). PK were compared after the first dose (1-7 days), 3 weeks, and 6 and 12 months posttransplant. In addition, side effects, effect of age and food on absorption, and rejection episodes were assessed by intent to treat analysis. Notable characteristics of this study include the use of a central laboratory for all sample analyses and the assessment of renal function using radioisotopic evaluation of glomerular filtration rates.

RESULTS

At baseline the two groups were comparable. Neoral resulted in higher peak levels of CsA and total drug exposure with comparable time to peak drug levels at days 1-7 and week 3. This trend was maintained at 6 and 12 months. Time on i.v. CsA was reduced in the Neoral group (8.4 vs. 11.1 days) and the weight adjusted daily dose of SIM required to achieve target trough levels was about 2-fold more than Neoral from day 22 onward. In addition, biopsy proven and treated and steroid-resistant rejection episodes were fewer in the Neoral group (6 vs. 12; P=0.01 and 1 vs. 8: P=0.004, respectively). Side effects were comparable in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoral was well tolerated and had greater biovailability than SIM without any increase in the incidence of side effects. In addition fewer episodes of rejection were observed with Neoral versus SIM. We conclude that Neoral is the CsA formulation of choice for use in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

Mycophenolate mofetil, microemulsion cyclosporine, and prednisone as primary immunosuppression for pediatric liver transplant recipients

Triple immunosuppressive therapy using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), microemulsion cyclosporine (me-CsA), and prednisone offers the potential for potent immunosuppression without intravenous drug therapy or anti-T-cell antibody induction therapy. This report describes the application of an immunosuppressive protocol (CNp) using MMF, me-CsA, and prednisone as primary immunosuppression for pediatric liver transplant recipients at the University of California at San Francisco. From August 1995 through December 1996, 26 children (17 boys, 9 girls) aged 1 month to 16 years (mean +/- standard deviation, 58 +/- 62 months; median, 31 months) underwent liver transplantation at our institution, receiving CNp as primary immunosuppression. Posttransplantation renal function, incidence of leukopenia, and drug tolerance within the group receiving CNp as primary immunosuppression were compared with those of 19 children who received primary immunosuppression consisting of azathioprine, oil-based gel-encapsulated cyclosporine, and prednisone with anti-T-cell antibody induction therapy at the same institution from October 1993 through July 1995. No significant difference was observed between immunosuppressive protocols in serum creatinine level or incidence of leukopenia requiring medical therapy during the first year posttransplantation. Whereas gastrointestinal symptoms were observed in approximately 30% of CNp recipients during initial immunotherapy, tolerance of CNp primary immunotherapy was routinely achieved by the dose reduction of MMF. At 1 year posttransplantation, 20 children (77%) remained on CNp primary immunotherapy, 5 children (19%) were receiving tacrolimus-based immunotherapy secondary to rejection, and 1 patient (4%) converted to tacrolimus-based immunotherapy secondary to persistent gastrointestinal intolerance. In conclusion, CNp provides an alternative immunosuppressive protocol that eliminates the necessity of intravenous and induction immunosuppressive therapy with no increased incidence of posttransplantation renal dysfunction or leukopenia and is well tolerated in children.

Improved cyclosporine bioavailability in black pediatric liver transplant recipients after administration of the microemulsion formulation

Black transplant recipients are associated with low cyclosporine bioavailability, which may contribute to the poorer clinical outcomes observed with these patients. In this analysis, we compared cyclosporine exposure in black (n = 9) and nonblack (n = 18) pediatric maintenance liver transplant recipients by using steady-state pharmacokinetic profiles obtained after administration of the original and microemulsion formulations of cyclosporine. Treatment with the original cyclosporine formulation resulted in lower mean dose-normalized, area under the concentration-versus-time curve values for black compared with nonblack pediatric liver transplant recipients. On conversion to the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine, black and nonblack patients experienced increases in cyclosporine bioavailability of 102% and 39%, respectively (P =.009 and P =.001). Because the increase in mean bioavailability was substantially greater for blacks, area under the concentration-versus-time curve values for this pediatric subpopulation became similar to those levels obtained for nonblacks receiving the microemulsion formulation for cyclosporine. When patients were further stratified by age, ethnic differences in bioavailability with the original formulation of cyclosporine were most apparent in the 1- to 5-year age group. Conversion to the microemulsion formulation resulted in a 164% increase (P =.05) in bioavailability for black patients within this age group such that, again, these levels became similar to area under the concentration-versus-time curve values obtained for young nonblacks receiving cyclosporine for microemulsion. Improvements in cyclosporine bioavailability after administration of the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine may translate to improved long-term graft and patient outcomes for black pediatric liver transplant recipients.

Reduced intrapatient variability of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients switched from oral Sandimmune to Neoral

Sixty-six renal transplant patients maintained on Sandimmune, the traditional formulation of cyclosporine, participated in an open-label, sequential trial to compare intrapatient variability in drug exposure before and after a switch to Neoral. Three 12-hour cyclosporine pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained over approximately 6 weeks while patients were receiving Sandimmune. Patients were then switched to Neoral, with the dose adjusted as necessary to maintain target trough blood cyclosporine concentrations. At approximately 4 and 6 weeks postconversion, 2 additional pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained. Key pharmacokinetic variables analyzed were area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum concentration (Cmax), and predose trough concentration (C0). Intrapatient variability in drug exposure for dose-normalized mean AUC, Cmax, and C0 was significantly reduced with Neoral, with 50 (76%), 57 (86%), and 45 (68%) patients experiencing reduced variability in AUC, Cmax, and C0, respectively (P < 0.001). Additionally, the total exposure to cyclosporine was more predictable from the trough level of cyclosporine with Neoral; the relationship between AUC and C0 was 0.81 for Neoral at both pharmacokinetic profiling time points but ranged from 0.49 to 0.69 for the 3 Sandimmune time points. The large reductions in intrapatient variability of pharmacokinetic variables for cyclosporine provided by Neoral indicate an improvement in the consistency of drug exposure, which may translate into important clinical benefits.