Hepatitis G virus coinfection in hepatitis C virus-infected liver transplant recipients

Hepatitis G virus

A number of new hepatitis viruses (G, TT, SEN) were discovered late in the past century. We review the data available in the literature and our own findings suggesting that the new hepatitis G virus (HGV), disclosed in the late 1990s, has been rather well studied. Analysis of many studies dealing with HGV mainly suggests the lymphotropicity of this virus. HGV or GBV-C has been ascertained to influence course and prognosis in the HIV-infected patient. Until now, the frequent presence of GBV-C in coinfections, hematological diseases, and biliary pathology gives no grounds to determine it as an “accidental tourist” that is of no significance. The similarity in properties of GBV-C and hepatitis C virus (HCV) offers the possibility of using HGV, and its induced experimental infection, as a model to study hepatitis C and to develop a hepatitis C vaccine.

GB virus C: insights into co-infection

GB virus C (GBV-C) is a single stranded positive sense RNA virus, which is a member of the Flaviviridae. It has a close sequence homology and genomic organisation to hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, unlike HCV it is not hepatotrophic. GBV-C replicates within cells of the haemopoietic lineage, in particular lymphocytes. No disease has been associated with GBV-C infection but co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) leads to improved morbidity and mortality for the HIV infected individual and slows progression to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. This potential benefit of GBV-C has been demonstrated in the pre and post highly active anti-retroviral treatment (HAART) eras. GBV-C has been found to decrease HIV replication in in vitro models. The mechanism of the beneficial effect of GBV-C appears to be mediated by alterations in the cellular immune response, the details of which remain unclear. Despite this, there continues to be controversy regarding the influence of GBV-C on HIV as several reports have questioned the beneficial effect. GBV-C does not appear to influence liver related disease in subjects co-infected with HCV or hepatitis B virus (HBV). Combination of HIV and HCV leads to accelerated liver disease. The influence of GBV-C in this situation is yet to be determined. Elucidation of the putative protective effect of GBV-C in HIV co-infection could potentially identify novel targets for anti-HIV therapeutics and lead to the development of disease modifying vaccines.

GB virus C/hepatitis G virus

GB virus C (GBV-C), or hepatitis G virus (HGV), is a recently discovered enveloped RNA virus belonging to the Flaviviridae family. GBV-C/HGV is transmitted by contaminated blood and/or blood products, intravenous drug use, from mother to child, sexually, and possibly through close social contacts. Several reports indicate a high prevalence of GBV-C/HGV viremia (1-4%) within healthy populations in Europe and North America, and an even higher prevalence (10-33%) among residents in South America and Africa. GBV-C/HGV has been suggested to be a causative agent for non-A-non-E hepatitis. However, several contradictory observations suggest that its ability to cause hepatitis is questionable. Taken together most data suggest that GBV-C/HGV is not a major cause of liver disease despite recent data indicating that it may infect and replicate in hepatocytes.

A cross-sectional study of SEN virus in liver transplant recipients

A new DNA virus, referred to as SEN virus (SEN V), has been isolated and is associated with blood-product transfusion and possibly Non A to Non E hepatitis. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of SEN V in liver transplant recipients at our center. Polymerase chain reaction was used to test for 2 genotypes of SEN V (SEN V:C/H and SEN V:D) in 58 unselected patients. Comparisons were made between SEN V--positive and SEN V--negative groups in terms of age, time posttransplantation, indications for transplantation, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels, and cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus status. Thirty of 58 transplant recipients (51.7%) were SEN V positive; 15.5% were positive for SEN V:C/H, 24.1% for SEN:D, and 12.1% for both strains. No significant differences were found based on primary indication for transplantation, including hepatitis C virus (HCV). Of the 14 of 21 patients with HCV seropositivity and HCV reinfection, 79% were positive for SEN V (P =.02). There was no difference in the proportion of patients with abnormal serum ALT and/or AST levels. A trend for the SEN V--positive group to have a greater mean ALT level (82 v 41 U/L; P =.067) was attributable to the subgroup with HCV recurrence because there was no difference in mean ALT levels (34.9 v 34.5 U/L; P =.968) in non--HCV-infected transplant recipients. Even in the subgroup (n = 14) with recurrent HCV, there was no statistically significant difference in mean ALT levels (140 v 105 U/L; P =.665). Age and cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus status were not significantly different between the 2 groups, but a significant difference in posttransplantation time was noted (16.8 v 32 months; P =.021). We conclude that SEN V is common among liver transplant recipients but does not appear to cause graft dysfunction as an isolated agent. There is a suggestion that SEN V may be associated with HCV recurrence, but we did not detect biochemical differences attributable to SEN V.

Hepatitis G virus: molecular organization, methods of detection, prevalence, and disease association

This article reviews data on hepatitis G virus (HGV) prevalence and possible disease associations in various groups of patients. An important fraction of acute or chronic hepatitis cases probably have a viral etiology and are not attributable to known hepatitis viruses. Therefore, researchers continually are looking for new hepatitis viruses. Among the agents found are members of GB hepatitis viruses, including GB-C virus, or HGV. This review presents the history of the discovery of HGV, its molecular biology and some methods of detection; results of clinical and molecular studies of HGV infection also are discussed.

The clinical significance of simultaneous infection with hepatitis G virus in patients with chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVES

Hepatitis G virus (HGV) is a recently discovered member of the flavivirus family that has been associated with acute and chronic hepatitis. HGV infection has been reported to coexist in 10-20% of patients with chronic hepatitis C. The significance of simultaneous infection with HGV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains to be clarified, as do the effects on HGV of therapeutic interventions such as interferon treatment or liver transplantation.

THE AIMS OF OUR STUDY WERE

1) to examine the frequency of HGV infection in the settings of liver transplantation and interferon therapy for hepatitis C; and 2) to compare HGV RNA levels before and after liver transplantation or interferon treatment.

METHODS

Pre-treatment sera were available in 65 patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with interferon; pretransplant sera were available in 49 patients transplanted for end stage liver disease associated with chronic hepatitis C. Information collected included age, sex, risk factors for hepatitis, concurrent liver disease, patient and allograft survival, biochemical response to interferon, histological activity index, and degree of fibrosis/cirrhosis. HCV genotyping was performed by sequencing the NS-5 region. HGV quantitation was performed using a research-based branched DNA (bDNA) assay with a set of probes directed at the 5' untranslated region.

RESULTS

HGV was detected in 10 of 49 patients (20%) before transplant and in 13 of 65 patients (20%) treated with interferon. There was a female predominance among HGV-positive compared with HGV-negative transplant patients (80% vs 20%; p < 0.01), but such a difference was not observed in the interferon-treated group. Hepatic iron concentration was lower in hepatic explants from patients who were HGV-positive than in those who were HGV-negative (318 +/- 145 microg/g dry weight vs 1497 +/- 2202 microg/g dry weight; p = 0.02). HCV exposure after 1980 was more common in the HGV-positive patients than in those who were HGV-negative for the entire study population (10 of 20 [50%] vs 16 of 66 [24%]; p = 0.03), as well as for the nontransplant subgroup (8 of 12 [67%] vs 12 of 39 [31%]; p = 0.03). HGV RNA levels declined at 1 yr after transplant in seven of eight patients. Among nine patients tested during or after interferon treatment, HGV RNA levels declined from pretreatment levels in all and disappeared in three.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with either interferon or liver transplantation, the frequency of coinfection with HGV is about 20%. HGV may be a more recent virus in the US than HCV. Coinfection with HGV does not appear to affect the likelihood of response to interferon in patients with hepatitis C. Finally, HGV RNA levels appear to decline after both liver transplantation and interferon therapy, suggesting possible suppression by increased HCV replication in the former case, and a possible drug treatment effect in the latter.

High prevalence of GB virus C/hepatitis G virus RNA in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus

Prevalence of GBV-C/HGV was determined in a cohort of HIV-infected patients, via a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction detection of RNA in serum, amplifying the NS5 region of GBV-C/HGV genome. GBV-C/HGV RNA was detected in 143 (37.7%) of 379 patients, with similar results in the different HIV risk groups: 25/56 (44.6%) in intravenous drug users, 66/161 (41%) in homo- and bisexual men, 35/108 (32.4%) in heterosexual patients, 6/20 (30%) in transfusion recipients (P=0.41). There was no difference according to the presence or absence of hepatitis C virus infection. In univariate analysis, GBV-C/HGV genome prevalence was lower in patients over 50 years old (18.2%), compared to other age groups (20-29 years: 34.2%; 30-39 years: 44.3%; 40-49 years: 36.7%, P=0.03), as well as in patients with normal CD4 cell count (29.2% vs. 45.4% between 200-500/mm3, and 35.3% below 200 CD4/mm3, P=0.012) and individuals with a chronic hepatitis B. However, in the multivariate analysis, the only prognostic factor of GBV-C/HGV RNA positivity was the presence of a chronic hepatitis B, compared to the absence of any HBV marker, or a previous exposition to HBV (presence of anti-HBc and/or anti-HBs, absence of HBsAg), or the presence of anti-HBs alone.

Impact of hepatitis G virus co-infection on the course of hepatitis C virus infection before and after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hepatitis G virus (HGV), a new RNA virus that is parenterally transmitted, has frequently been found in patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection but its role in chronic liver disease is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of HGV infection in transplantation patients infected with hepatitis C and to assess the impact of HGV co-infection on the course of HCV infection after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Eighty-nine liver transplantation recipients with persistent hepatitis C viremia detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were evaluated. Serum samples were tested before and after liver transplantation for HGV RNA by two different PCR methods: LC assay (Abbott Laboratories) and an RT-PCR procedure which we developed using the silica gel technique for extraction of the HGV RNA. E2 antibodies were detected before orthotopic liver transplantation by an EIA-test. HCV RNA was quantified by branched DNA assay, and HCV genotype was determined. A mean of nine liver biopsy specimens were examined for each patient and the severity of the lesions was compared in HCV-positive patients with or without HGV co-infection.

RESULTS

The concordance between the two HGV RNA detection methods was excellent and the reproducibility of our RT-PCR procedure was confirmed. The prevalence of pretransplantation and posttransplantation HGV infection was 11% and 19%, respectively. Pretransplantation HGV infection was positively correlated with posttransplantation HGV infection (p<0.001). Before transplantation the E2 antibodies seroprevalence was 34%. Seven patients became HGV RNA positive after transplantation, but all of them were negative for E2 antibodies. Among the patients who remained RNA negative after liver transplantation, 40% were positive for E2 antibodies (p=0.04). Pretransplantation clinical features (except AST mean value) were not different in patients with HCV and HGV co-infection and those with HCV only. After a mean follow-up of 34 months (range: 6 to 70), 67/89 (75%) patients developed histological features of recurrent hepatitis but the frequency of the occurrence of graft hepatitis was not different between HGV/HCV co-infected patients and those with HCV alone (p=0.89). The mean interval from orthotopic liver transplantation to recurrence was 12.2 months (range: 3-63), which was not different for HVG/HVC-co-infected patients and HCV-infected patients. The histological severity of posttransplantation liver disease, and the graft and patient survival were not different for patients with and without HGV co-infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest the general persistence of HGV infection after liver transplantation, but HGV co-infection did not appear to influence the posttransplantation course of HCV infection. Before transplantation the prevalence of E2 antibodies was 34%, and our data clearly indicate that E2 antibodies were protective against HGV infection.