Combined liver-kidney transplantation: what are the indications?

Early Outcomes With the Liver-kidney Safety Net

BACKGROUND

A safety net policy was implemented in August 2017 giving liver transplant alone (LTA) recipients with significant renal dysfunction posttransplant priority for subsequent kidney transplantation (KT). This study was undertaken to evaluate early outcomes under this policy.

METHODS

Adults undergoing LTA after implementation of the safety net policy and were subsequently listed for KT between 60 and 365 days after liver transplantation contained in United Network for Organ Sharing data were examined. Outcomes of interest were receipt of a kidney transplant and postliver transplant survival. Safety net patients were compared with LTA recipients not subsequently listed for KT as well as to patients listed for simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplant yet underwent LTA and were not subsequently listed for KT.

RESULTS

There were 100 patients listed for safety net KT versus 9458 patients undergoing LTA without subsequent KT listing. The cumulative incidence of KT following listing was 32.5% at 180 days. The safety net patients had similar 1-year unadjusted patient survival (96.4% versus 93.4%; P = 0.234) but superior adjusted survival (hazard ratio0.133, 0.3570.960; P = 0.041) versus LTA recipients not subsequently listed for KT. Safety net patients had superior 1-year unadjusted (96.4% versus 75.0%; P < 0.001) and adjusted (hazard ratio0.039, 0.1260.406; P < 0.001) survival versus SLK listed patients undergoing LTA without subsequent KT listing.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety net appears to provide rapid access to KT with good early survival for those able to take advantage of it. Survival of patients unable to qualify for KT listing after LTA needs to be better understood before further limitation of SLK, however.

Effect of Renal Diagnosis on Survival in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation is lifesaving, however, the utility of allocating 2 organs to a single recipient remains controversial, particularly in the face of potentially inferior survival. This study aims to determine the effect of renal indication for transplantation on simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation outcomes.

METHODS

All adult recipients of combined whole liver-kidney transplants in the United Network for Organ Sharing database from 2003 to 2016 with a renal diagnosis of hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), acute tubular necrosis (ATN), or hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) were examined. Comparisons were made between the HTN/DM group and the ATN/HRS group using standard statistical methods.

RESULTS

There were 1,204 patients in the HRS/ATN group vs 1,272 patients in the HTN/DM group. The HTN/DM patients were slightly older (58.1 vs 56.4 years; p < 0.001), more likely to have liver disease due to chronic viral hepatitis (33.2% vs 21.5%; p < 0.001), and less acutely ill (mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 27.2 vs 33.1; p < 0.001) than their HRS/ATN counterparts. The prevalence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis was 16.8% in both groups. Donor demographics were similar in both groups, although HTN/DM patients were more likely to have a local (81.6% vs 67.7%; p < 0.001) rather than regional donor. Patient survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were significantly lower in the HTN/DM group (87.4%, 78.2%, and 71.2% vs 90.7%, 84.1%, and 76.6%, respectively). Median survival was 118 months for the HTN/DM group vs 139.7 months for the HRS/ATN (p < 0.001). The HTN/DM patients were at significantly higher risk of death (hazard ratio 1.533; p < 0.001), liver graft loss (hazard ratio 1.611; p < 0.001), and renal graft loss (hazard ratio 1.592; p < 0.001) than ATN/HRS patients on multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a lower acuity of illness, HTN/DM patients have inferior survival after simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation than those with ATN/HRS. This should be considered in risk adjustment and allocation schemes.

Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Cirrhosis

Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs commonly in patients with advanced cirrhosis and negatively impacts pre- and post-transplant outcomes. Physiologic changes that occur in patients with decompensated cirrhosis with ascites, place these patients at high risk of AKI. The most common causes of AKI in cirrhosis include prerenal injury, acute tubular necrosis (ATN), and the hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), accounting for more than 80% of AKI in this population. Distinguishing between these causes is particularly important for prognostication and treatment. Treatment of Type 1 HRS with vasoconstrictors and albumin improves short term survival and renal function in some patients while awaiting liver transplantation. Patients with HRS who fail to respond to medical therapy or those with severe renal failure of other etiology may require renal replacement therapy. Simultaneous liver kidney transplant (SLK) is needed in many of these patients to improve their post-transplant outcomes. However, the criteria to select patients who would benefit from SLK transplantation are based on consensus and lack strong evidence to support them. In this regard, novel serum and/or urinary biomarkers such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, interleukins-6 and 18, kidney injury molecule-1, fatty acid binding protein, and endothelin-1 are emerging with a potential for accurately differentiating common causes of AKI. Prospective studies are needed on the use of these biomarkers to predict accurately renal function recovery after liver transplantation alone in order to optimize personalized use of SLK.

Kidney stones: an update on current pharmacological management and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Kidney stones are a common problem worldwide with substantial morbidities and economic costs. Medical therapy reduces stone recurrence significantly. Much progress has been made in the last several decades in improving therapy of stone disease.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses i) the effect of medical expulsive therapy on spontaneous stone passage, ii) pharmacotherapy in the prevention of stone recurrence and iii) future directions in the treatment of kidney stone disease.

EXPERT OPINION

Fluid intake to promote urine volume of at least 2.5 L each day is essential to prevent stone formation. Dietary recommendations should be adjusted based on individual metabolic abnormalities. Properly dosed thiazide treatment is the standard therapy for calcium stone formers with idiopathic hypercalciuria. Potassium alkali therapy is considered for hypocitraturia, but caution should be taken to prevent potential risk of calcium phosphate stone formation. For absorptive hyperoxaluria, low oxalate diet and increased dietary calcium intake are recommended. Pyridoxine has been shown effective in some cases of primary hyperoxaluria type I. Allopurinol is used in calcium oxalate stone formers with hyperuricosuria. Treatment of cystine stones remains challenging. Tiopronin can be used if urinary alkalinization and adequate fluid intake are insufficient. For struvite stones, complete surgical removal coupled with appropriate antibiotic therapy is necessary.

Native kidney function after renal transplantation combined with other solid organs in preemptive patients

Kidney transplantations combined with other solid organs are progressively increasing in number. There are no guidelines regarding the nephrologic indications for combined transplantations, namely liver-kidney (LKT), or heart-kidney (HKT), in preemptive patients with chronic kidney failure who are not on regular dialysis therapy. The objective of this study was to assess the functional contribution of the native kidneys after preemptive kidney transplantation combined with other solid organs. From 2004, 9 patients (aged 50.3 +/- 8.5 years) with chronic kidney failure (creatinine 2.5 +/- 1.0 mg/dL) caused by polycystic kidney disease (n = 4), vascular nephropathy (n = 2), interstitial nephropathy (n = 1), glomerulonephritis (n = 1), or end-stage kidney disease (n = 1), underwent combined transplantations (8 LKT, 1 HKT). A scintigraphic functional study (Tc-99DMSA or Tc-99mMAG3), was performed at 4 +/- 3 months after transplantation to evaluate the functional contribution of both the native kidneys and the graft. All patients were given immunosuppressive drugs, including a calcineurin inhibitor (tacrolimus/or cyclosporine). At the time of scintigraphy, renal function in all patients was 1.3 +/- 0.3 mg/dL. The functional contribution of the transplanted kidneys was on average 77 +/- 18%. Only in 1 patient was the contribution of the graft <50%. At follow-up after 36 months, patient and kidney survivals were 100%. The study confirmed a high risk of loss of native kidney function in the presence of organic nephropathy. In light of our experience, a creatinine clearance <30 mL/min in an appropriate cutoff for a combined transplantation. Close clinical and instrumental assessment pretransplant is essential before proceeding with a combined transplant program to exclude functional forms and to optimize the use of organs.

Simultaneous combined liver and kidney transplantation: a single center experience

Renal dysfunction is common in patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT) and affects outcome following LT. Combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) has been proposed as effective treatment for patients with chronic diseases of both organs, some with hepatorenal syndrome and for liver-based metabolic diseases affecting kidney. This study is undertaken to analyze results of CLKT at a single center. Of 2690 LTs performed between 1992 and 2007, there were 39 CLKTs; most common indications were metabolic, cirrhosis and polycystic disease. With follow-up of up to 170 months, 11 died (overall survival 71.8%); one-, five-, and 10-yr patient and liver graft survival is 77%, 73.7%, and 73.7%, respectively, and kidney graft survival is 77%, 70%, and 70%, respectively. Survival among metabolic group (78.6%) appeared to be better than non-metabolic group (68%); however, this difference was not significant (p = 0.39). Fifteen surviving patients (53.6%) have mild/moderate renal impairment (creatinine > or = 125 micromol/L). None has severe renal failure (serum creatinine > or = 250 micromol/L) or end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis. CLKT has good results in selected groups of patients. It provides protection to kidney allograft in liver-based metabolic diseases affecting kidney. The rate of acute rejection episodes of kidney is low. Significant proportion develops long-term mild/moderate renal dysfunction. Careful attention to immunosuppression to minimize nephrotoxicity may help.

Current indications for combined liver and kidney transplantation in adults

A significant number of patients awaiting liver transplantation have associated renal failure. Combined Liver and Kidney Transplantation (CLKT) is increasingly offered especially since the introduction of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD). Decision to perform CLKT is straightforward when both organs suffer end-stage failure. However, the indications for CLKT are not well defined and there is controversy concerning some. We reviewed available data on PUBMED, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), Organ Procurement Transplantation Network (OPTN), European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) and discuss all current indications for CLKT.

CONCLUSION

Overall long-term outcome following CLKT is acceptable. There is an urgent need to further refine our ability to identify the cases with reversible renal injury in the setting of end-stage liver disease to avoid unnecessary CLKT. Liver protects the kidney from disease recurrence and allograft loss in metabolic diseases. However, the use of liver allograft for immunological protection of kidneys in highly sensitised patients with positive cross-match and previously failed renal transplants is still experimental.

Anesthesia for synchronous liver and kidney transplantation in a child: A case report

Synchronous liver and kidney transplantation (SLK) is considered a treatment of choice for an end-stage liver disease patient with irreversible kidney disease. Several perioperative renal supportive treatments, especially continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), have contributed to the effective control of hypervolemia and electrolytes and acid-base disturbances leading to high success rate in adults. However, anesthesia for SLK in children is frequently difficult since the CRRT is seldom available because of difficulty in securing large venous lines. In addition, conventional techniques such as venovenous bypass and side-clamping of the inferior vena cava are less applicable in small children causing difficult volume control. Herein, we report a case of SLK in a child with glycogen storage disease type I with a review of literature.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation in children: indications and outcome

Although it remains a relatively infrequent procedure in children, CLKT has become a viable option for a select group of pediatric patients with severe liver and kidney disease. Most are performed for rare primary diseases such as PH1, but a selected few are performed in the setting of concomitant hepatic and renal failure of uncertain etiology and prognosis. This article reviews the indications for and outcomes following CLKT in children. While it focuses on the specific primary diseases which impact liver and kidney function simultaneously, it addresses the indications based on concomitant hepatic and renal failure, such as seen in the hepatorenal syndrome, as well.

Declining outcomes in simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation in the MELD era: ineffective usage of renal allografts

BACKGROUND

When the United Network for Organ Sharing changed its algorithm for liver allocation to the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) system in 2002, highest priority shifted to patients with renal insufficiency as a major component of their end-stage liver disease. An unintended consequence of the new system was a rapid increase in the number of simultaneous liver-kidney transplants (SLK) being performed yearly.

METHODS

Adult recipients of deceased donor liver transplants (LT, n=19,137), kidney transplants (n=33,712), and SLK transplants (n=1,032) between 1987 and 2006 were evaluated based on United Network for Organ Sharing data. Recipients were stratified by donor subgroup, MELD score, pre- versus post-MELD era, and length of time on dialysis. Matched-control analyses were performed, and graft and patient survival were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses.

RESULTS

MELD era outcomes demonstrate a decline in patient survival after SLK. Using matched-control analysis, we are unable to demonstrate a benefit in the SLK cohort compared with LT, despite the fact that higher quality allografts are being used for SLK. Subgroup analysis of the SLK cohort did demonstrate an increase in overall 1-year patient and liver graft survival only in those patients on long-term dialysis (> or =3 months) compared with LT (84.5% vs. 70.8%, P=0.008; hazards ratio 0.57 [95% CI 0.34, 0.95], P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that SLK may be overused in the MELD era and that current prioritization of kidney grafts to those liver failure patients results in wasting of limited resources.

[Renal graft outcome in patients with associated liver transplant]

INTRODUCTION

Nearly 50% of liver transplant recipients have some degree of renal failure; patients in haemodialysis treatment have a higher risk of suffering hepatic diseases related to viral infections or concomitant pathologies. Improvement in surgical and organ preservation techniques and immunosuppressive therapy has permitted multiorganic transplants in patients needing both liver and kidney organs.

OBJECTIVES

To review our results in renal transplants in those patients with liver and kidney transplants.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Retrospective study of the 15 patients with liver and kidney transplants performed in our Hospital. We have reviewed patients main characteristics, liver and renal failure causes, renal graft and patient outcome and complications relate to renal transplant.

RESULTS

Between 1975 and December 2006 we performed 1483 kidney transplants and between 1991 and December 2006, 409 liver transplants. We performed multiorganic liver and kidney transplants to 15 patients (4 women and 11 men). The average for liver transplant recipients was 52.5+/-9.3 years (range 37-61) and for kidney transplant recipients was 51+/-12.5 years (35-66). Cold ischemia was 6.4+/-5.4 hours (6-8) in simultaneous liver-kidney transplant and 20.5+/-5.4 (8-27 hours) in non-simultaneous ones. Three patients had a renal transplant before the liver one (two functioning which had no changes after hepatic transplant but the other was lost due to IgA glomeruloneprhitis relapse and received a simultaneous kidney-liver transplant). Six patients received a simultaneous kidney-liver transplant and eight patients a renal transplant between 16 and 83 months (x=50.5+/-25.9 months) after the liver transplant. A renal graft was lost due to renal vein thrombosis and two due to IgA relapse; the others were functioning between 6 and 264 months of follow-up (x=92.5+/-66.7) with creatinine levels of 1.86+/-mg/100, (range 1-4.5). Four patients died due to hepatic failure between 8 months and 21 years after renal transplant and another died of oesophagus cancer 14 years after the kidney transplant, in all cases with functioning renal graft. There were no cases of kidney graft acute rejection in simultaneous transplants but there were five in non-simultaneous ones. Immunotherapy was based on steroids and tacrolimus.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver-kidney transplants are worthy options in patients with hepatic and renal end failure. Acute rejection seems to have fewer incidences in simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation and follow-up in primary hyperoxaluria treatment: report of three cases

INTRODUCTION

Primary hyperoxaluria type-1 (PH1) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by impaired activity of the hepatic peroxisomal alanine-glyoxilate aminotransferase, which leads to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and requires combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT). Herein, we have reported 3 children diagnosed with PH1 who received CLKT. CASE 1: A 4.5-year-old boy with an elder brother diagnosed with PH1 was diagnosed during family screening when the sonography showed multiple calculi. Within 5 years he experienced flank pain, hematuria attacks, and anuric phases due to obstruction and received hemodialysis (HD) when ESRD appeared. CLKT was performed from his full-match sister at the age of 9.5. He is doing well at 5.5 years. CASE 2: A 7-year-old boy was admitted with polyuria, polydypsia, and stomach pain with renal stones on sonography. PD was instituted when serum creatinine and BUN levels were measured as high values. At the age of 10, CKLT was performed from his mother. His liver and renal function tests are well at 14 months after CKLT. CASE 3: A 2.5-year-old girl had attacks of dark urine without any pain; renal stones were imaged on sonography. She was diagnosed with PH1 and operated on several times due to obstruction. She received peritoneal dialysis and a cadaveric CLKT was performed when she was 9 years old. At the age of 16, she experienced chronic allograft nephropathy requiring HD and subsequent cadaveric donor renal transplantation at 1.5 years after initiation of HD.

CONCLUSION

Herein, we have presented the favorable clinical outcomes of patients with CKLT to indicate the validity of this treatment choice for PH1.

Nephrological Indications in Combined Liver-Kidney Transplantation

In isolated liver transplantation pretransplant renal failure is a major mortality risk, there are no guidelines at the moment to establish the indications for a combined liver-kidney transplantation (LKT). In irreversible chronic renal failure (CRF) not on dialysis, nephrological evaluation is required to assess the need for a simultaneous kidney transplantation. There are no experiences about the functional contribution of native kidneys post-LKT. Herein we have reported the case of two patients who underwent LKT in 2004 due to CRF, not yet on dialysis. At the moment of LKT, the first patient (polycystic kidney disease) had a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) = 29 mL/min, and the second recipient (vascular nephropathy and diabetes), a GFR = 33 mL/min. In both cases we did not observe delayed graft function. At discharge the serum creatinine was 1.1 and 1.0 mg/dL, respectively, which was maintained during follow-up. In both cases renal scintigraphy with Tc-99 DMSA was performed to evaluate the functional contributions of transplanted versus native kidneys. In the first case scintigraphy at 9 months after LKT demonstrated an 81% contribution from the transplanted kidney, 9% from the right and 10% from the left native kidneys. In the second case, at 3 months after LKT, the functional contributions were 76%, 10%, and 14%, respectively. The transplanted kidney nephron mass may avoid the need for hemodialysis in the early posttransplant period; in the midterm it may help to maintain residual renal function. As in other combined transplant programs (heart-kidney, kidney-pancreas) with irreversible CRF, a GFR < or = 30 to 35 mL/min may be an indication for LKT, but we need more experience.

The course of type 1 hepato-renal syndrome post liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepato-renal syndrome (HRS) is a functional form of renal failure that occurs in patients with end-stage liver disease. Previously considered fatal without liver transplantation, treatment with vasoconstrictors and albumin has been demonstrated to improve renal function in patients with type 1 HRS. Liver transplantation is still considered the definitive treatment for HRS. However, the renal recovery rate and those factors that predict recovery post orthotopic liver transplantation have not been determined.

METHODS

We reviewed the hospital course of 28 patients who met the International Ascites Club criteria for type I HRS and who underwent orthotopic liver transplant. The patients' demographic and pre- and post-operative laboratory data were recorded; patients were followed for 4 months post-transplantation or until death.

RESULTS

The MELD score of the patients was 30+/-6. The mean duration of HRS prior to liver transplantation was 37+/-27 days. HRS resolved in 16 patients (58%). The mean time to resolution of HRS was 21+/-27 days, with a range of 4-110 days. Eight (50%) patients in whom the HRS resolved were undergoing pre-transplantation dialysis. The age of the recipients (49+/-10 vs 56+/-12; P = 0.05), the total bilirubin level on post-operative day 7 (6.0+/-4.3 vs 10.1+/-5.9 mg/dl; P = 0.04), alcoholic liver disease and the requirement for post-transplant dialysis were predictors of resolution of HRS by univariate analysis. Only alcoholic liver disease and post-transplant dialysis were independent (negative) predictors of resolution of HRS. Seven of the 12 (58%) patients who developed chronic renal insufficiency remained dialysis dependent. The pre-operative serum creatinine was non-significantly higher in the non-resolvers who remained dialysis dependent compared to those who did not require long-term dialysis (3.0+/-1.0 vs 2.3+/-0.4 mg/dl; P = 0.1) Four patients died; in three of these patients the HRS had resolved prior to their death.

CONCLUSION

HRS is not always cured by orthotopic liver transplant. Pre-transplantation dialysis or a long waiting period should not preclude transplantation in patients with HRS. HRS may not resolve in patients with alcoholic liver disease. We were unable to accurately define that group of patients with HRS who required long-term dialysis and could theoretically benefit from combined liver-kidney transplantation.

Combined Liver and Kidney Transplantation in a Multicenter Transplantation Program in Chile

INTRODUCTION

Combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) is an exceptional therapeutic procedure limited to a few diseases with advanced compromise of these organs. Hyperoxaluria type I and polycystic disease are the most frequent indications. The aim of this article was to report our indications and results of CLKT in a multicenter transplantation program in Chile.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Our Excel database was reviewed to select patients who were treated with CLKT between 1993 and July 2004.

RESULTS

Among 242 liver transplantations (LT) and 48 kidney transplantations (KT), 7 were CLKT, representing 2.8% of LT and 14.5% of KT. Four patients were women and 3 were male of average age 46.8 years. One patient was a child. Most frequent indications were chronic renal failure associated with terminal liver disease and polycystic disease. One patient needed liver retransplantation due to hepatic vein thrombosis. One patient had a biliary fistula and another had a urinary fistula, treated conservatively. Acute liver rejection took place in 3 cases, 1 of which required antibodies. Two patients died, 1 due to aspergillosis and the other due to vascular complications in the transplanted liver. Actuarial survival rates were 71.4% at 1 and 5 years. Chronic renal failure is not a contraindication to LT.

CONCLUSION

CLKT is an acceptable option for these patients.

Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in end-stage renal disease patients: Two decades of experience at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

AIM: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common disease in Taiwan. The prevalence of viral hepatitis infection and the subsequent development of HCC are well known to be higher in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) than among the general population. However, information on hepatic resection for ESRD-HCC patients is limited.

METHODS: The clinical features of 26 ESRD-HCC patients who underwent hepatic resection from 1982 to 2001 were retrospectively reviewed. Meanwhile, the clinicopathological features and the outcome of 1198 HCC patients without ESRD undergoing hepatic resection were used for comparison.

RESULTS: Of 1224 surgically resected HCC patients, 26 (4.2%) were ESRD-HCC. Univariate analysis revealed more associated disease, more physical signs of anemia and postoperative complications, lower hemoglobin, platelet, α-fetoprotein, elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine levels, smaller tumors, lower HBsAg positivity, higher HCV positivity, and longer hospital stays in the ESRD-HCC group compared with the HCC group. Furthermore, multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that elevated BUN and creatinine levels were the only two independently significant factors in the patients in the ESRD-HCC group. Overall and disease-free survival rates were similar between the ESRD-HCC and HCC groups.

CONCLUSION: Elevated BUN and creatinine were the only two main independent factors differentiating ESRD-HCC from HCC patients. ESRD should not be a contraindication of hepatic resection in HCC patients; however, careful operative techniques and perioperative care are crucial to achieving lower morbidity and mortality. Comparable overall survival and disease-free survival can be achieved in selected ESRD-HCC patients undergoing hepatic resection when compared with conventional HCC patients.

Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in end-stage renal disease patients: Two decades of experience at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

AIM: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common disease in Taiwan. The prevalence of viral hepatitis infection and the subsequent development of HCC are well known to be higher in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) than among the general population. However, information on hepatic resection for ESRD-HCC patients is limited.

METHODS: The clinical features of 26 ESRD-HCC patients who underwent hepatic resection from 1982 to 2001 were retrospectively reviewed. Meanwhile, the clinicopathological features and the outcome of 1198 HCC patients without ESRD undergoing hepatic resection were used for comparison.

RESULTS: Of 1224 surgically resected HCC patients, 26 (4.2%) were ESRD-HCC. Univariate analysis revealed more associated disease, more physical signs of anemia and postoperative complications, lower hemoglobin, platelet, α-fetoprotein, elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine levels, smaller tumors, lower HBsAg positivity, higher HCV positivity, and longer hospital stays in the ESRD-HCC group compared with the HCC group. Furthermore, multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that elevated BUN and creatinine levels were the only two independently significant factors in the patients in the ESRD-HCC group. Overall and disease-free survival rates were similar between the ESRD-HCC and HCC groups.

CONCLUSION: Elevated BUN and creatinine were the only two main independent factors differentiating ESRD-HCC from HCC patients. ESRD should not be a contraindication of hepatic resection in HCC patients; however, careful operative techniques and perioperative care are crucial to achieving lower morbidity and mortality. Comparable overall survival and disease-free survival can be achieved in selected ESRD-HCC patients undergoing hepatic resection when compared with conventional HCC patients.

The long-term impact of liver transplantation on kidney function in familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy patients

The aim of the study is to evaluate the long-term kidney function after liver transplantation (LTx) in familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) Portuguese type patients and compare the findings with patients transplanted for chronic liver disease of other origin. We analysed the medical records of 32 FAP patients who underwent transplantation between 1990 and 1999 with a follow-up of more than 1 year after LTx. The control group consisted of 61 patients who had undergone LTx for chronic liver disease. Kidney function was measured by the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), serum creatinine and urea. There were no differences between the groups in creatinine and urea levels during the follow-up. However, during the first year after transplantation, the increase in creatinine and urea was significantly higher in the control group (P < 0.01). The decline in GFR after transplantation was also more pronounced in the controls (P < 0.01). Initially after LTx, kidney function deteriorated in both FAP and control patients, but the deterioration was more pronounced in the controls. The decline of the FAP patients' kidney function after LTx was not more pronounced than that observed in control patients, although many FAP patients' kidney function was impaired before the procedure, suggesting that LTx may halt the progression of kidney damage caused by amyloid deposition.

Selection and preparation of candidates for combined liver-kidney transplantation: experience at a single center-two case reports

BACKGROUND

The published experiences of combined liver-kidney transplantation (LKT) are favorable, but there is still no uniformity concerning the impact on hepatorenal syndrome, or in cases of symptomatic hepatorenal polycystic disease. Herein we describe our experience with two LKTs, with particular reference to the selection and preparation of the candidates, and the surgical approach.

METHODS

Between 1996 and June 2003, we performed 430 liver transplants in 398 recipients, including two LKTs: one in a patient with hepatorenal polycystic disease (case 1) and the other in a patient with HBV(+) cirrhosis undergoing dialysis after a previous isolated kidney transplant (case 2).

RESULTS

In case 1, LKT and right nephrectomy were performed 2 months after a left lumbar nephrectomy. In case 2, LKT was performed 10 months after an isolated kidney transplant, without removing the first graft, which recovered function after 3 months. Both patients are now in good health with functioning grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

LKT requires careful selection and preparation of candidates to optimize the probability of success. In well-compensated dialyzed patients with cirrhosis due to viral hepatitis, we believe that a combined approach is indicated after antiviral therapy. In cases of hepatorenal cystic disease, a two-stage surgical approach makes it possible to eliminate the risk of infection and intracyst hemorrhage in nonfunctioning polycystic kidneys.

Decreased proteinuria following liver transplantation in a patient with type C liver cirrhosis complicated with nephrotic syndrome: A case report

Type C liver cirrhosis is often associated with a nephrotic syndrome secondary to membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Liver transplantation in such patients may sometimes worsen viremia, causing renal dysfunction upon the introduction of immunosuppressive drugs. We present a case of a patient whose proteinuria decreased after liver transplantation. The patient was a 49-year-old male who had been followed due to chronic hepatitis type C from 1984. From 1999 he was diagnosed as having nephrotic syndrome. We performed a living related liver transplant on August 21, 2001. An intraoperative renal biopsy revealed the histology to show membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. The volume of proteinuria was 2 to 11 g/day before surgery. After surgery it varied from 6 to 10 g/day, gradually decreasing to 1 to 2 g/day. One of the causes of reduced proteinuria may be alleviation of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis by immunosuppression. But from the view that the recovery of the renal function followed the recovery of liver function, the major effect may have been alleviated hepatorenal syndrome.

Detection of HLA-G in serum and graft biopsy associated with fewer acute rejections following combined liver-kidney transplantation: possible implications for monitoring patients

Human leukocyte antigen G (HLA-G) is a regulatory molecule that is expressed in the cytotrophoblast during implantation and is thought to allow the tolerance and the development of the semiallogeneic embryo. In vitro, HLA-G inhibits natural killer (NK) cell and CD8 T-cell cytotoxicity. HLA-G also decreases CD4 T-cell expansion. This suggests that it participates in the acceptance of allogeneic organ transplants in humans. We here describe the detection of high concentration of HLA-G in serum from liver-kidney transplant patients, but not in kidney transplant patients. This finding is supported by the ectopic expression of HLA-G in graft biopsies. Finally, its association with a low number of acute transplant rejections, especially in liver-kidney transplant patients led us to propose that HLA-G may serve to monitor transplant patients who are likely to accept their allograft and, thus, may benefit of a reduced immunosuppressive treatment.

Human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G) expression in biliary epithelial cells is associated with allograft acceptance in liver-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Liver allograft is known to protect simultaneously transplanted organs from acute rejection. We have reported that only 6% of combined liver-kidney recipients, versus 32.5% of kidney recipients, develop kidney graft acute rejection. Release of soluble human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules by the liver has been proposed as a possible tolerogenic mechanism involved in the better acceptance of double transplants. The HLA-G molecule is acknowledged to possess tolerogenic properties.

METHODS

We investigated the involvement of HLA-G in allogeneic transplant acceptance by analyzing its expression in kidney and liver biopsies of 40 combined transplanted patients.

RESULTS

We demonstrate the presence of HLA-G in 14 out of 40 liver and five out of nine kidney transplants biopsies. HLA-G is expressed de novo by cells that are otherwise frequently susceptible target cells of acute rejection, i.e. liver biliary and renal tubular epithelial cells. We show a significant association between HLA-G expression in liver biliary epithelial cells and the absence of liver graft rejection. No acute or chronic rejection of the kidney graft was observed in patients in whom HLA-G was expressed in the liver graft.

CONCLUSIONS

HLA-G expression in the liver allograft is associated with a lower frequency of hepatic and renal acute rejection and may be involved in the acceptance of simultaneously transplanted organs.

Results of combined and sequential liver-kidney transplantation

Experience with combined liver-kidney transplantation (L-KTx) has increased, but controversy regarding this procedure continues because the indications are not clearly defined yet. Between 1984 and 2000, 38 patients underwent simultaneous L-KTx and 9 patients underwent sequential transplantation, receiving either a liver before a kidney or a kidney before a liver. Main indications for a simultaneous procedure were polycystic liver-kidney disease with cirrhosis and coincidental renal failure. The main indications for sequential procedure were cirrhosis caused by viral infection for the liver and glomerulonephritis for the kidneys. Outcomes in these patients were evaluated retrospectively. Regarding simultaneous transplantation, 28 (73.7%) long-term survivors were followed up for 0.7 to 12.5 years. Currently, 24 (63.2%) patients are alive with good liver function. Fourteen patients died; 10 patients died in the early postoperative phase because of septic complications, and most of them were cirrhotic with a poor preoperative clinical status. Currently, 2 of the surviving patients (8%) have returned to dialysis, 4 (17%) have reduced renal function, and 18 (75%) have good renal function. Five liver and 2 kidney retransplantations were performed during the follow-up. In cases of sequential grafting, patients undergoing kidney transplantation in the presence of a previously transplanted stable liver did better than those who underwent liver transplantation after kidney transplantation. When liver transplantation was performed early and electively before substantial worsening, combined L-KTx is a safe procedure offering excellent long-term palliation.

Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database comparing renal allografts and patient survival in combined liver-kidney transplantation with the contralateral allografts in kidney alone or kidney-pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND

Combined liver-kidney transplantation (LKT) is the accepted treatment for patients with liver failure and irreversible renal insufficiency. Controversy exists as to whether simultaneous LKT with organs from the same donor confers immunologic and graft survival benefit to the kidney allograft. This study compares the outcomes of simultaneous LKT with the contralateral kidneys used for kidney alone transplantation (KAT) or combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) to understand the factors that account for the differences in survival.

METHODS

From October 1987 to October 2001, LKTs with organs from 899 cadaver donors were reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing; 800 contralateral kidneys from these donors were used in 628 KAT and 172 PKT recipients. These 800 paired control patients were the basis of this analysis.

RESULTS

Graft and patient survival rates were lower among LKT recipients compared with KAT (P<0.001) and PKT recipients (P<0.001), because of a higher patient mortality rate during the first 3 months posttransplant. Among human leukocyte antigen-mismatched transplants, LKT recipients demonstrated the highest 1-year rejection-free survival rate (LKT 70%, KAT 61%, and PKT 57% ) (P=0.005 vs. KAT, P=0.005 vs. PKT). There was a lower incidence of renal graft loss resulting from chronic rejection among LKT recipients (LKT 2% vs. KAT 8% vs. PKT 6%, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing LKT exhibit a higher rate of mortality during the first year posttransplant compared with patients undergoing KAT and KPT. Analysis of the data indicates an allograft-enhancing effect of liver transplantation on the renal allograft.

Primary hyperoxaluria: simultaneous combined liver and kidney transplantation from a living related donor

Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is a rare inherited metabolic disorder in which deficiency of the liver enzyme AGT leads to renal failure and systemic oxalosis. Timely, combined cadaveric liver-kidney transplantation (LKT) is recommended for end-stage renal failure (ESRF) caused by PH1; however, the shortage of cadaveric organs has generated enthusiasm for living-related transplantation in years. Recently, successful sequential LKT from the same living donor has been reported in a child with PH1. We present a sister-to-brother simultaneous LKT in a pediatric patient who suffered from PH1 with ESRF. Twelve months after transplantation, his daily urine oxalate excretion was decreased from 160 mg to 19.5 mg with normal liver and renal allograft functions. In addition to the well-known advantages of living organ transplantation, simultaneous LKT may facilitate early postoperative hemodynamic stability and may induce immunotolerance and allow for low-dose immunosuppression.

Incidence of renal and liver rejection and patient survival rate following combined liver and kidney transplantation

Multiple organ transplantations are used to treat chronic multiple organ failure. However, long-term mortality and graft tolerance remain to be evaluated. We carried out a retrospective and comparative analysis of 45 patients who underwent a combined liver and kidney (LK) transplantation (LKT) from the same donor. They were compared to 86 matched patients who underwent kidney (K) transplantation (KT). All patients had an organic renal failure associated with cirrhosis (n = 35) or with inherited disease (n = 10). Nineteen (42.9%) had been transplanted previously. The patients' survival rate was 85% at 1 year and 82% at 3 years. Seven patients died within the first 3 months, due to severe polymicrobial infection. Two patients in the LK population (4.2%) developed acute rejection of the kidney graft compared to 24 of the 86 matched renal transplanted patients (32.6%). In parallel, acute liver rejection was observed in 14 cases (31.1%) in the LK population. The occurrence of acute rejection was not associated with panel-reactive lymphocytotoxic antibodies (n = 16), nor with positive cross-matches (n = 3). Four of the 45 patients (8.8%) subsequently developed chronic renal allograft rejection, and 16 cases of chronic hepatic dysfunction were noted (42.2%). In conclusion, the overall survival rate following combined liver kidney transplantation is acceptable, and LKT can be proposed to patients with kidney failure associated with liver dysfunction, primary oxaluria or amyloid neuropathy. The main cause of mortality in this population was severe infectious complications. The frequency of acute kidney rejection was lower than in single transplantation.

Identification of patients best suited for combined liver-kidney transplantation: part II

Liver-kidney transplantation (LKT) should be reserved for those recipients with primary disease affecting both organs. However, increasing transplant list waiting times have increased the development and duration of acute renal failure before liver transplantation. Furthermore, the need for posttransplant calcineurin inhibitors can render healing from acute renal failure difficult. Because of the increasing requests for and controversy over the topic of a kidney with a liver transplant (OLT) when complete failure of the kidney is not known, the following article will review the impact of renal failure on liver transplant outcome, treatment of peri-OLT renal failure, rejection rates after LKT, survival after LKT, and information on renal histology and progression of disease into the beginnings of an algorithm for making a decision about combined LKT.

Results of simultaneous and sequential pediatric liver and kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The indications for simultaneous and sequential pediatric liver (LTx) and kidney (KTx) transplantation have not been well defined. We herein report the results of our experience with these procedures in children with end-stage liver disease and/or subsequent end-stage renal disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1984 and 1995, 12 LTx recipients received 15 kidney allografts. Eight simultaneous and seven sequential LTx/KTx were performed. There were six males and six females, with a mean age of 10.9 years (1.5-23.7). One of the eight simultaneous LTx/KTx was part of a multivisceral allograft. Five KTx were performed at varied intervals after successful LTx, one KTx was performed after a previous simultaneous LTx/KTx, and one KTx was performed after previous sequential LTx/KTx. Immunosuppression was with tacrolimus or cyclosporine and steroids. Indications for LTx were oxalosis (four), congenital hepatic fibrosis (two), cystinosis (one), polycystic liver disease (one), A-1-A deficiency (one), Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN)-related (one), cryptogenic cirrhosis (one), and hepatoblastoma (one). Indications for KTx were oxalosis (four), drug-induced (four), polycystic kidney disease (three), cystinosis (one), and glomerulonephritis (1).

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up of 58 months (0.9-130), the overall patient survival rate was 58% (7/12). One-year and 5-year actuarial patient survival rates were 66% and 58%, respectively. Patient survival rates at 1 year after KTx according to United Network of Organ Sharing (liver) status were 100% for status 3, 50% for status 2, and 0% for status 1. The overall renal allograft survival rate was 47%. Actuarial renal allograft survival rates were 53% at 1 and 5 years. The overall hepatic allograft survival rate was equivalent to the overall patient survival rate (58%). Six of seven surviving patients have normal renal allograft function, and one patient has moderate chronic allograft nephropathy. All surviving patients have normal hepatic allograft function. Six (86%) of seven sequentially transplanted kidneys developed acute cellular rejection compared with only two (25%) of eight simultaneously transplanted kidneys (P<0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneously transplanted kidneys were less likely to develop rejection than sequentially transplanted kidneys in this series. This did not have any bearing on patient or graft survival rates. Mortality correlated directly with the severity of United Network of Organ Sharing status at the time of kidney transplantation. Candidates for simultaneous or sequential LTx/KTx should be prioritized based on medical stability to optimize distribution of scarce renal allografts.

Tumor antigen pulsed dendritic cells enhance the cytolytic activity of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in human hepatocellular cancer

OBJECTIVE

Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) stimulated with interleukin-2 (IL-2) ex vivo have been successfully used therapeutically in some cancer patients, but their potency in eliciting an effective anti-tumor response is variable. We have tried to augment killing activity of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes derived from hepato-cellular carcinoma (HCC) using autologous monocytes derived dendritic cells.

METHODS

Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) from 6 patient with hepatocellular carcinoma were isolated and the phenotype were further characterized. From the same patients, autologous dendritic cells were generated from CD14+ monocytes that were cultured for 6 days in the presence of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin 4 (IL-4). Those professional antigen presenting cells were pulsed with whole autologous hepatoma tumor lysates (pDC). TILs were cocultured with pDC or unpulsed DC. To assess the cytotoxic potency of TILs, the ability to lyse the tumor cell targets K652, Daudi and an allogeneic HCC celline was determined in a standard cytotoxic assay.

RESULTS

Tumor cells targets in vitro are poorly lysed by tumor infiltrating lymphocytes indicating T-cell hyporesponsiveness. In contrast, the killing activity of HCC derived TILs against Daudi (9.15% +/- 7.5) and allogeneic HCC tumor target (18.2% +/- 9.2) could be significantly augmented when stimulated with pDC (Daudi: 38% +/- 6.8 and allogeneic HCC: 55% +/- 10). The killing activity of TILs against K562 was unaffected by pDC.

CONCLUSION

The low cytotoxic activity profile of HCC derived TILs in vitro can be increased by tumor lysate pulsed dendritic cells and may therefore be more effective in vivo when used for adoptive immunotherapy.

The kidney in liver transplantation

Early recognition and determination of the cause of renal failure in patients with ESLD can be difficult because of the potential interplay among various factors and the wide array of differential diagnoses. A systematic approach, however, assists clinicians to identify common and potentially reversible causes of ARF. It is crucial to distinguish patients with functional renal failure, such as HRS, from those with advanced irreversible renal disease. Isolated liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for the former, and CLKT may be a therapeutic option for the latter. Because of the ever-increasing shortage of donor organs, CLKT must be used judiciously. Kidney biopsy may resolve diagnostic dilemmas. Management of renal complications post-OLT remains a challenge for the physician caring for transplant patients. Modification of nephrotoxic immunosuppressive regimens to avoid postoperative ARF/CRI has met with variable results. Azathioprine has been used in place of cyclosporine. Therapy with polyclonal antilymphocyte preparations or anti-OKT3 monoclonal antibodies (Orthoclone) should be reserved for patients with delayed graft function and for the treatment of acute rejection. The routine use of these agents as prophylactic therapy is not recommended. Data on the impact of renal insufficiency on patient and allograft outcome are inconsistent. Nonetheless, the authors' literature review suggests that renal failure associated with sepsis and, except for patients with HRS, renal failure requiring dialysis are the most consistent features associated with a worse outcome. The need for preoperative or postoperative dialysis has no adverse effect on survival in patients with HRS. On long-term follow-up, despite a greater percentage of patients reaching ESRD in patients with HRS compared with their non-HRS counterparts, the overall outcome in patients with HRS following OLT is favorable. In patients with HRS requiring prolonged dialysis (i.e., greater than 4 weeks), however, irreversible renal failure may develop, necessitating CLKT. Ideally, timely referral of patients for OLT may avoid this complication and obviate the need for double organ transplantation.

Long-term care of the liver transplant recipient

Many liver transplant recipients are now reaching survival beyond 5 years from the liver transplant procedure, and many others are alive more than a decade from acquiring their new liver. Orthotopic liver transplant recipients enjoy the benefits of normal liver function, but a variety of metabolic and other medical problems often develop that require diagnosis and adequate management. These problems include hyperlipidemia, obesity, diabetes mellitus, renal disfunction, arterial hypertension, bone disease and neuropsychiatric syndromes. The gastroenterologist, internist, or local family physician is frequently called on to identify and treat these postoperative complications in conjunction with physicians at the transplant center.

An overview of combined heart and kidney transplantation

This review describes to date the experience with combined heart-kidney transplant (HNTx) from a single donor. HNTxs are very uncommon relative to single-organ transplants of the heart and kidney, as well as combined kidney-pancreas and combined kidney-liver transplants. Two groups of patients seem to be candidates for HNTx: 1) those with end-stage heart disease and fixed (nonreversible) renal disease, and 2) those with end-stage renal disease and severe cardiac disease unamenable to other treatment. In both groups, significant disease should be limited to the heart and kidney. Reports to date generally suggest decreased cardiac rejection in HNTx relative to heart-only transplants. Renal rejection in HNTx seems markedly reduced relative to kidney-only transplants. Simultaneous rejection of both organs is very uncommon, and, therefore, surveillance of both organs is necessary. Short-term patient survival seems to be acceptable in HNTx. Long-term patient and graft survival remains unknown, and further multi-center reports are needed.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation in patients with cirrhosis and renal failure: effect of a positive cross-match and benefits of combined transplantation

Patients with renal failure after liver transplantation have a particularly poor prognosis. Therefore, in the setting of end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis or severe renal insufficiency that will not improve after liver replacement, combined liver-kidney transplantation (LKT) is the preferred approach. We have adopted a policy of LKT in patients with end-stage liver disease and renal insufficiency undergoing dialysis or with a creatinine clearance less than 35 mL/min and evidence of chronic renal dysfunction. Since 1991, we have performed 208 orthotopic liver transplantations. Fourteen patients (8%) have undergone combined LKT, including 6 patients undergoing hemodialysis. Cytotoxic cross-matches (modified Amos technique and antihuman globulin method) were performed on 13 of 14 patients and were positive in 3 patients. Two patients died less than 4 months after LKT and 12 patients are alive and well. Graft survival censored for patient death was 100% for liver allografts and 93% for renal allografts, with a mean follow-up of 39 +/- 24 months. The most recent serum creatinine level in the patients with the 11 functioning grafts was 1.1 +/- 0.6 mg/dL. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 50% of simultaneous liver allografts. By contrast, only a single episode (6%) of renal allograft dysfunction was attributable to acute rejection. All rejection episodes occurred in the first 90 days after transplantation and were steroid sensitive. Three of 14 combined procedures were performed in the setting of a positive cytotoxic cross-match. In 2 recent patients, the results were confirmed by positive cross-matches to the donor's T and B cells by flow cytometry. Flow cytometric cross-matches reverted to negative 1 hour after liver transplantation and several hours before the administration of antithymocyte globulin. The cross-matches remained negative on postoperative days 1 and 7. Presently, all 3 patients with a positive cross-match enjoy normal hepatic and renal function at 631, 706, and 2275 days follow-up. Renal scans were performed in 4 LKT recipients not previously undergoing hemodialysis and indicated varying and unpredictable degrees of function in the native and transplanted kidneys. In conclusion, combined LKT can be performed safely and is associated with a low rate of acute rejection, even in the setting of a positive cross-match. Predicting which patients with renal insufficiency will benefit from LKT remains challenging; however, these results suggest that LKT should be encouraged in patients with evidence of irreversible renal insufficiency who require liver transplantation.