Interferon-alpha treatment of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in recipients of solid organ transplants

Relationship between rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin and development of PTLD and its aggressive form in renal transplant population

Introduction

The aim of our study is to explore the relationship of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (R-ATG) on development of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) and its aggressive forms (monomorphic PTLD and Hodgkin lymphoma) in renal transplant recipients.

Methodology

All patients diagnosed with PTLD post-renal transplant in the United States’ Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network from 2003 till 2013 and followed up till 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Multi-variable logistic regression analysis assessed association of R-ATG to development of PTLD and its aggressive form.

Results

Risk of developing PTLD post renal transplant is 1.35%. In comparison to interleukin-2 blocker induction therapy, R-ATG is associated with increased risk of development of PTLD (Odds Ratio = 1.48, confidence interval ranges from 1.04 to 2.11, p = .02) and is associated with higher risk of development of aggressive PTLD (Odds Ratio = 1.83, confidence interval ranges from 1.001 to 3.34, p = .04).

Conclusion

We conclude that R-ATG induction is associated with a higher risk of PTLD and its aggressive form (monomorphic PTLD and Hodgkin lymphoma). Careful monitoring for development of PTLD in renal transplant recipients receiving R-ATG induction therapy is advised.

Post Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder is an extremely fatal complication arising in transplant recipients as a side effect of immunosuppression. PTLDs are seen after both solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplants though the incidence is much higher in the former. Primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection or reactivation due to a state of immune dysregulation along with intensity of immunosuppression used are of paramount importance in pathogenesis of PTLD. EBV associated PTLDs occur early in the post transplant period whereas late onset lymphomas are usually EBV negative. The uncontrolled B cell proliferation can create a spectrum of histological patterns from nondestructive lesions to destructive polymorphic or more aggressive monomorphic PTLDs. Early detection of seropositivity by serial monitoring in the recipient can prevent PTLD development by starting pre-emptive therapy. The mainstay treatment in established cases remains reduction of immunosuppression. Chemotherapeutic and immunomodulatory agents are added sequentially based on the type of PTLD and based on its response to initial therapy. Despite various treatment options available, the morbidity remains high and achieving state of disease remission without causing graft rejection can be quite challenging. Hence, a better understanding in pathobiology of EBV+ versus EBV- PTLDS may help prevent lymphomagenesis in transplant recipients.

Lymphoma in Danon disease with chronic rhabdomyolysis treated with EPOCH-R: A case report

Rare disorders often represent a challenge for clinicians and require close collaboration of an interdisciplinary team.We present the complex case of a 22-year-old male with Danon disease and late-onset of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after heart transplantation. The critical aspects of his condition were: pre-existing rhabdomyolysis; infiltration of muscle and gut with lymphoma; advanced clinical stage with bulky disease; nonresponsiveness to the reduction of immunosuppression and rituximab monotherapy; expected cardiotoxicity of anthracyclines. Therefore, the patient was treated with the EPOCH-R protocol, which includes continuous administration of doxorubicin over 4 days, instead of R-CHOP, in which the anthracycline is given in a short single infusion. Complete remission was achieved after the third cycle; rhabdomyolysis did not increase and heart function was not affected. The patient received a total of 6 cycles and is still in metabolic complete remission.We conclude that patients with Danon disease can be treated with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy and that continuous infusion of EPOCH-R does not exacerbate pre-existing rhabdomyolysis.

A Case Report of NK-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disease With a Wide Involvement of Digestive Tract Develop Into Epstein-Barr Virus Associated NK/T Cell Lymphoma in an Immunocompetent Patient

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) plays an important role in various diseases. EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disease (LPD) is a rare disease with a canceration tendency. It is difficult to differentiate LPD with involvement of digestive tract from Crohn disease due to similar clinical and endoscopic manifestations. We present a case report of multiple ulcers with esophagus, small bowel and the entire colon involved, proved to be NK-Cell LPD, developed into EBV-associated NK/T Cell lymphoma, in an immunocompetent man who was initially misdiagnosed as Crohn disease.This report underscores that intestinal ulcers should be cautiously diagnosed, for it sometimes could be a precancerous lesion.

Epstein-Barr virus-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in solid organ transplant recipients

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) contributes to the pathogenesis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) in more than 70% of cases. EBV DNAemia surveillance has been reported to assist in the prevention and treatment of PTLD in hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. Derived from experience in HSCT and taking into account that PCR-based EBV monitoring techniques are currently available in most solid organ transplant (SOT) centres, there is a great interest in EBV surveillance and prevention of PTLD in SOT recipients. In the present document we have tried to address from a practical perspective different important topics regarding the prevention and management of EBV-related PTLD in SOT. To this end, available information on SOT was analysed and combined with potentially useful data from HSCT and expert observations. The document is therefore structured according to different specific questions, each of them culminating in a consensus opinion of the panel of European experts, grading the answers according to internationally recognized levels of evidence. The addressed issues were grouped under the following topics. (i) Timing and epidemiological data of PTLD. Prophylaxis guided by clinical risk factors of early and late PTLD in SOT. (ii) Relationship of EBV DNAemia load monitoring and the development of PTLD in solid organ transplant recipients. (iii) Monitoring of EBV DNAemia after SOT. Which population should be monitored? What is the optimal timing of the monitoring? (iv) Management of SOT recipients with persistent and/or increasing EBV DNAemia.

Pan-viral-microRNA screening identifies interferon inhibition as a common function of diverse viruses

Diverse viruses encode regulatory RNAs called microRNAs (miRNAs). Despite much progress, the functions of the majority of viral miRNAs remain unknown. Most previous studies have used biochemical methods to uncover targets of viral miRNAs, but it is unclear what fraction of these targets is functionally important. Here, we apply an alternative strategy based on the premise that assorted viral miRNAs will share functionality. Screening a library of >70 human viral miRNAs showed that three unrelated miRNAs from distantly related herpesviruses significantly inhibited IFN signaling. Strikingly, each of these miRNAs directly reduced expression of the cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein (CBP), which as part of the p300-CBP complex, mediates IFN signaling. We show that both 5' and 3' derivatives from Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) encoded miR-BART-18 precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA) and the orthologous pre-miRNA from Rhesus lymphocryptovirus contribute to reducing IFN signaling. Thus, through both convergent and divergent evolutionary mechanisms, varied herpesviral miRNAs share the ability to decrease IFN signaling. Restoring miR-BART-18 to cells infected with an EBV miRNA mutant conveyed a cellular growth advantage upon IFN treatment, and relevant miRNAs from other herpesviruses were able to complement this activity. Blocking miR-BART-18 function in an EBV(+) tumor cell line renders cells more susceptible to IFN-mediated effects. These findings provide a mechanism that can at least partially explain the resistance of some EBV-associated tumors to IFN therapy. Our work suggests that similar pan-viral-miRNA functional-based screening strategies are warranted for determining relevant activities of other viral miRNAs.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are a serious complication after solid organ or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and include a range of diseases from benign proliferations to malignant lymphomas. Risk factors for developing PTLD include Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, recipient age, transplanted organ, type of immunosuppression, and genetics. Uncontrolled proliferation of EBV-infected B cells is implicated in EBV-positive PTLD, whereas the pathogenesis of EBV-negative PTLD may be similar to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the general population. The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies PTLD into four categories: early lesions, polymorphic PTLD, monomorphic PTLD, and classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL). Treatment is aimed at cure of PTLD, while maintaining transplanted organ function. However, there are no established guidelines for the treatment of PTLD. Immune suppression reduction (ISR) is the first line of treatment in most cases, with more recent data suggesting early use of rituximab. In more aggressive forms of PTLD, upfront chemotherapy may offer a better and more durable response. Sequential therapy using rituximab followed by chemotherapy has demonstrated promising results and may establish a standard of care. Novel therapies including anti-viral agents, adoptive immunotherapy, and monoclonal antibodies targeting cytokines require further study in the prevention and treatment of PTLD.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD): risk factors, diagnosis, and current treatment strategies

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases (PTLD) are heterogeneous lymphoid disorders ranging from indolent polyclonal proliferations to aggressive lymphomas that complicate solid organ or hematopoietic transplantation. Risk factors for PTLD include viral infections, degree of immunosuppression, recipient age and race, allograft type, and host genetic variations. Clinically, extra-nodal disease is common including 10-15 % presenting with central nervous system (CNS) disease. Most PTLD cases are B cell (5-10 % T/NK cell or Hodgkin lymphoma), while over one-third are EBV-negative. World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic categories are: early lesions, polymorphic, and monomorphic PTLD; although in practice, a clear separation is not always possible. Therapeutically, reduction in immunosuppression remains a mainstay, and recent data has documented the importance of rituximab +/- combination chemotherapy. Therapy for primary CNS PTLD should be managed according to immunocompetent CNS paradigms. Finally, novel treatment strategies for PTLD have emerged, including adoptive immunotherapy and rational targeted therapeutics (e.g., anti-CD30 based therapy and downstream signaling pathways of latent membrane protein-2A).

Molecular pathogenesis of B-cell posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: what do we know so far?

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a potentially fatal disease that arises in 2%-10% of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplants and is most frequently of B-cell origin. This very heterogeneous disorder ranges from benign lymphoproliferations to malignant lymphomas, and despite the clear association with Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) infection, its etiology is still obscure. Although a number of risk factors have been identified (EBV serostatus, graft type, and immunosuppressive regimen), it is currently not possible to predict which transplant patient will eventually develop PTLD. Genetic studies have linked translocations (involving C-MYC, IGH, BCL-2), various copy number variations, DNA mutations (PIM1, PAX5, C-MYC, RhoH/TTF), and polymorphisms in both the host (IFN-gamma, IL-10, TGF-beta, HLA) and the EBV genome to B-cell PTLD development. Furthermore, the tumor microenvironment seems to play an important role in the course of disease representing a local niche that can allow antitumor immune responses even in an immunocompromised host. Taken together, B-cell PTLD pathogenesis is very complex due to the interplay of many different (patient-dependent) factors and requires thorough molecular analysis for the development of novel tailored therapies. This review aims at giving a global overview of the currently known parameters that contribute to the development of B-cell PTLD.

Therapeutic options in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders

Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are the second most frequent malignancies after solid organ transplantation and cover a wide spectrum ranging from polyclonal early lesions to monomorphic lymphoma. Available treatment modalities include immunosuppression reduction, immunotherapy with anti-B-cell monoclonal antibodies, chemotherapy, antiviral therapy, cytotoxic T-cell therapy as well as surgery and irradiation. Owing to the small number of cases and the heterogeneity of PTLD, current treatment strategies are mostly based on case reports and small, often retrospective studies. Moreover, many studies on the treatment of PTLD have involved a combination of different treatment options, complicating the evaluation of individual treatment components. However, there has been significant progress over the last few years. Three prospective phase II trials on the efficacy of rituximab monotherapy have shown significant complete remission rates without any relevant toxicity. A prospective, multicenter, international phase II trial evaluating sequential treatment with rituximab and CHOP-based chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) is ongoing and preliminary results have been promising. Cytotoxic T-cell therapy targeting Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-infected B cells has shown low toxicity and high efficacy in a phase II trial and will be a future therapeutic option at specialized centers. Here, we review the currently available data on the different treatment modalities with a focus on PTLD following solid organ transplantation in adult patients.

Post transplant lymphoproliferative disorders: risk, classification, and therapeutic recommendations

OPINION STATEMENT

Post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a heterogeneous disease that may occur in recipients of solid organ transplants (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The risk of lymphoma is increased 20-120% compared with the general population with risk dependent in part on level of immune suppression. In addition, recent data have emerged, including HLA and cytokine gene polymorphisms, regarding genetic susceptibility to PTLD. Based on morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular criteria, PLTD are classified into 4 pathologic categories: early lesions, polymorphic, monomorphic, and classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Evaluation by expert hematopathology is critical in establishing the diagnosis. The aim of therapy for most patients is cure with the concurrent goal of preservation of allograft function. Given the pathologic and clinical heterogeneity of PTLD, treatment is often individualized. A mainstay of therapy remains reduction of immune suppression (RI) with the level of reduction being dependent on several factors (e.g., history of rejection, current dosing, and type of allograft). Outside of early lesions and/or low tumor burden, however, RI alone is associated with cure in a minority of subjects. We approach most newly-diagnosed polymorphic and monomorphic PTLDs similarly using frontline single-agent rituximab (4 weeks followed by abbreviated maintenance) in conjunction with RI. Frontline combination chemotherapy may be warranted for patients with high tumor burden in need of prompt response or following failure of RI and/or rituximab. Due to chemotherapy-related complications in PTLD, especially infectious, we advocate comprehensive supportive care measures. Surgery or radiation may be considered for select patients with early-stage disease. For PTLD subjects with primary CNS lymphoma, we utilize therapeutic paradigms similar to immunocompetent CNS lymphoma using high-dose methotrexate-based therapy with concurrent rituximab therapy and sequential high-dose cytarabine. Finally, novel therapeutic strategies, especially adoptive immunotherapy, should continued to be explored.

Emerging therapeutic strategies for Epstein-Barr virus+ post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

De novo malignancies represent an increasing concern in the transplant population, particularly as long-term graft and patient survival improves. EBV-associated B-cell lymphoma in the setting of PTLD is the leading malignancy in children following solid organ transplantation. Therapeutic strategies can be categorized as pharmacologic, biologic, and cell-based but the variable efficacy of these approaches and the complexity of PTLD suggest that new treatment options are warranted. Here, we review current therapeutic strategies for treatment of PTLD. We also describe the life cycle of EBV, addressing the viral mechanisms that contribute to the genesis and persistence of EBV+ B-cell lymphomas. Specifically, we focus on the oncogenic signaling pathways activated by the EBV LMP1 and LMP2a to understand the underlying mechanisms and mediators of lymphomagenesis with the goal of identifying novel, rational therapeutic targets for the treatment of EBV-associated malignancies.

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder presenting as a nonhealing extraction socket: a case report and review of the literature

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a well-recognized complication of long-term immunosuppression following hematopoietic or solid organ transplantation and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We present a unique case of PTLD that manifested with a nonhealing dental extraction socket 17 years after renal transplantation. We summarize the existing literature and present a review of an additional 25 cases. These highlight the variable clinical presentations of PTLD within the oral cavity and clear potential for delayed presentation at this anatomical subsite.

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease in liver transplant patients

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are a life-threatening complication following solid organ transplantation. Many posttransplant lymphomas develop from the uncontrolled proliferation of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-infected B-cells, whereas EBV-negative PTLDs were increasingly recognized within the past decade. Major risk factors for the development of PTLDs after liver transplantation are immunosuppressive therapy and the type of underlying disease: viral hepatitis, autoimmune liver disease, or alcoholic liver cirrhosis contribute to an increased risk for PTLD. Therapeutic regimens include reduction of immunosuppression, the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab, and chemotherapy, as well as new approaches using interferon-α and anti-interleukin-6 antibodies. Despite the different therapeutic regimens, mortality from PTLD remains high. Therefore, it is of major importance to identify patients at risk at an early stage of the disease. In this review, risk factors for PTLD development after liver transplantation, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and therapy are discussed.

Epstein-Barr virus infection in transplant recipients: Summary of a workshop on surveillance, prevention and treatment

Diseases caused by the Epstein-Barr virus are of great significance among organ transplant recipients. One of these diseases, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, is a major complication among organ transplant recipients. Management of this entity is problematic due to the difficulties with laboratory surveillance, diagnosis, prevention and treatment. A group of Canadian and American experts was assembled to discuss these aspects of Epstein-Barr virus diseases in Canadian organ transplant recipients. This report summarizes the relevant background literature and levels of evidence in relation to the outcomes of the deliberations and recommendations by the expert panel.

Management of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders following solid organ transplant: an update

Development of secondary malignancies is a well-known complication of solid organ transplant, with skin cancer and lymphoproliferative disorders being most frequently observed. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders, caused by diminished immune surveillance, represent a broad spectrum of pathological and clinical disorders, ranging from benign conditions to very aggressive lymphomas. Here we review treatment options for adult patients experiencing posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders following solid organ transplant.

Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders: diagnosis, prognosis, and current approaches to therapy

Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are a heterogenous group of abnormal lymphoid proliferations that occur after solid organ transplant (SOT) or hematopoietic transplantation. PTLDs consist of a disease spectrum ranging from hyperplasia to aggressive lymphomas with 60-70% being Epstein-Barr virus positive. The majority of cases are B-cell, although 10-15% are of T-cell origin or rarely Hodgkin lymphoma. Recent SOT series suggest PTLD occurs at a median of 36-40 months after transplant. Clinically, extra-nodal disease is common (up to 75-85%) including CNS involvement, which is seen in 10-15% of all cases. Since the first report over 40 years ago, PTLD has remained one of the most morbid complications associated with SOT. However, recent data suggests improved survival in the modern era, especially with the integration of early rituximab-based therapy. These studies utilized first line rituximab (+/- chemotherapy) together with reduced immune suppression (RI) for monomorphic and polymorphic PTLD. It will be critical in future studies to determine which PTLDs are most amenable to initial therapy with RI alone, versus RI/rituximab, versus RI/rituximab/chemotherapy. Additionally, novel therapeutics, such as adoptive immunotherapy, should continue to be explored.

Lymphoproliferative disorders after solid organ transplantation-classification, incidence, risk factors, early detection and treatment options

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a heterogeneous disease group of benign and malignant entities. The new World Health Organisation classification introduced in 2008 distinguishes early lesions, polymorphic, monomorphic and classical Hodgkin lymphoma-type PTLD. Based on the time of appearance, early and late forms can be identified.PTLDs are the second most frequent posttransplantation tumors in adulthood, and the most frequent ones in childhood. The incidence varies with the transplanted organ-from 1%-2% following kidney transplantation to as high as 10% following thoracic organ transplantation-due to different intensities in immunosuppression. Immunocompromised state and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection are the two major risk factors.In Europe and the US approximately 85% of PTLDs are of B-cell origin, and the majority are EBV-associated. Symptoms are often unspecific; extranodal, organ manifestations and central nervous system involvement is common. Early lesions respond well to a decrease in immunosuppression. Malignant entities are treated with rituximab, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical therapy. Adoptive T-cell transfer represents a promising therapeutic approach. The prognosis is favorable in early PTLD, and poor in late PTLD. Five-year survival is 30% for high-grade lymphomas. The prognosis of EBV-negative lymphomas is worse.Lowering the risk of PTLD may be achieved by low dose maintenance immunosuppression, immunosuppressive drugs inhibiting cell proliferation, and special immunotherapy (e.g. interleukin-2 inhibitors). Early detection is especially important for high risk-e.g. EBV-negative-patients, where the appearance of EBV-DNA and the increase in its titer may help.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in children: recent outcomes and response to dual rituximab/low-dose chemotherapy combination

PTLD is a major complication after transplantation. Treatment options for PTLD are not standardized, usually sequential, starting with reduction in immunosuppression. Recently, we have used a dual combination of rituximab and reduced dose chemotherapy (R/C) directly after failed RI. We retrospectively identified 30 pediatric PTLD cases across four organ systems at our center from 1995 to 2008. We assessed recent outcomes of PTLD in children, comparing the responses to different regimens. Two-yr failure-free survival was best in renal and heart recipients (80-88%), followed by liver (57%) and lung (0%). Of note, two patients were Epstein-Barr peripheral blood viral load low positive but tumor EBER negative. Three patients had no detectable viral load but were EBER positive. The R/C regimen (n = 8) had the highest CR rate (100%), low recurrence (12%) and lowest mortality (12%). Interferon (n = 4) had 75% CR, 33% recurrence and 25% mortality. Rituximab/prednisone (n = 5) had 80% CR, 50% recurrence and 20% mortality. Other chemotherapy (n = 7, including all 4 T-cell PTLDs) had 57% CR, 0% recurrence and 14% mortality. Direct dual R/C combination therapy after failed RI is effective and offers another treatment option for B-cell PTLD.

The changing face of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in the era of molecular EBV monitoring

Pediatric PTLD is often associated with primary EBV infection and immunosuppression. The aim was to retrospectively review the spectrum of histologically documented PTLD for two time intervals differentiated by changes in use of molecular EBV monitoring. Eleven of 146 patients (7.5%) in 2001-2005 (Era A) and 10 of 92 (10.9%) in 1993-1997 (Era B) were diagnosed with PTLD. The median age at liver transplantation (0.8 and 0.9 yr, respectively) and the median duration between liver transplant and diagnosis of PTLD (0.6 and 0.7 yr, respectively) were similar in both eras. However, patients in Era A presented with significantly less advanced histological disease compared to patients in Era B (p=0.03). Specifically, nine patients (82%) in Era A had Pl hyperplasia/polymorphic PTLD, whereas in Era B, six had advanced histological disease (five monomorphic and one unclassified). Three transplant recipients in Era B died secondary to PTLD, whereas there were no PTLD-related deaths in Era A (p=0.03). Heightened awareness of risk for PTLD, alterations in baseline immunosuppression regimens, implementation of molecular EBV monitoring, pre-emptive reduction in immunosuppression and improved therapeutic options may have all contributed to a milder PTLD phenotype and improved clinical outcomes.

Management of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in adult solid organ transplant recipients - BCSH and BTS Guidelines

A joint working group established by the Haemato-oncology subgroup of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH) and the British Transplantation Society (BTS) has reviewed the available literature and made recommendations for the diagnosis and management of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in adult recipients of solid organ transplants. This review details the therapeutic options recommended including reduction in immunosuppression (RIS), transplant organ resection, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Effective therapy should be instituted before progressive disease results in declining performance status and multi-organ dysfunction. The goal of treatment should be a durable complete remission with retention of transplanted organ function with minimal toxicity.

EBV-associated post-transplantation B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder following allogenic stem cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: tumor regression after reduction of immunosuppression--a case report

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated B-cell post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a severe complication following stem cell transplantation. This is believed to occur as a result of iatrogenic immunosuppression leading to a relaxation of T-cell control of EBV infection and thus allowing viral reactivation and proliferation of EBV-infected B-lymphocytes. In support of this notion, reduction of immunosuppressive therapy may lead to regression of PTLD.We present a case of an 18-year-old male developing a monomorphic B-cell PTLD 2 months after receiving an allogenic stem cell transplant for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Reduction of immunosuppressive therapy led to regression of lymphadenopathy. Nevertheless, the patient died 3 months afterwards due to extensive graft-vs.-host-disease and sepsis. As a diagnostic lymph node biopsy was performed only after reduction of immunosuppressive therapy, we are able to study the histopathological changes characterizing PTLD regression. We observed extensive apoptosis of blast cells, accompanied by an abundant infiltrate comprising predominantly CD8-positive, Granzyme B-positive T-cells. This observation supports the idea that regression of PTLD is mediated by cytotoxic T-cells and is in keeping with the observation that T-cell depletion, represents a major risk factor for the development of PTLD.

Prospective study of sequential reduction in immunosuppression, interferon alpha-2B, and chemotherapy for posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder

BACKGROUND

Several interventions can cure posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD); a sequential approach is usual, starting with reduction in immunosuppressives (RI). The efficacy of RI remains poorly defined, particularly in adults. We assessed an algorithm starting with a defined course of RI in all patients, escalating to interferon (IFN) alpha2b, and finally to chemotherapy, in a prospective multicenter phase II study of adult solid organ transplant recipients. The design predated rituximab.

METHODS

Reduction in immunosuppressives: cyclosporine or tacrolimus reduction by 50% for 2 weeks; a further 50% reduction for 1 week if not in complete remission (CR). Intravenous acyclovir was given for the duration of all RI. Patients with less than CR, or any rejection, resumed immunosuppressives and proceeded to IFN 3 MIU/m(2)/day for up to 3 months; if less than CR, ProMACE-CytaBOM chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were registered over 60 months; 16 patients with biopsy-proven PTLD were eligible (13 heart, 3 kidney recipients). Median age was 47 (24-75) years. Reduction in immunosuppressives resulted in only 1 of 16 partial responses (12.5%), no CR. Progressive disease occurred in 8 of 16 (50%) and 6 of 16 (38%) experienced rejection. Only 1 of 13 (7%) patients achieved durable CR with IFN. Seven eligible patients received ProMACE-CytaBOM chemotherapy, five of seven (67%) achieving CR, four of five durable beyond 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduction in immunosuppressives produced no CR, progressive disease and rejection were frequent; response to IFN was rare. A strong case can be made for adding rituximab to RI as initial therapy. Chemotherapy resulted in 57% durable CR, data that are relevant for the up to two thirds of PTLD patients who are refractory to rituximab.

The management of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a life-threatening complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplantation. Most cases are EBV-positive B-cell neoplasms, which occur in the setting of pharmacologically impaired cellular immunity. Several different treatment strategies including cytotoxic antitumor therapy, anti-B-cell monoclonal antibody therapy, antiviral therapy, and modalities aimed at restoration of EBV-specific cellular immunity have been employed. In addition, efforts to identify patients at high risk for PTLD have resulted in attempts at prophylactic and preemptive therapies. In this review we discuss the available literature on differing approaches to PTLD management, identify areas in need of further investigation, and, when possible, make general recommendations. Reduction of immunosuppression remains the mainstay of first-line treatment. Accumulating evidence supports the role of rituximab as second-line therapy with cytotoxic chemotherapy reserved for specific circumstances. Further investigations are needed to better define the role of more novel and less widely available therapies such as the adoptive transfer of EBV-specific T cells and optimization of antiviral therapies.

CNS or bone marrow involvement as risk factors for poor survival in post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders in children after solid organ transplantation

PURPOSE

To identify prognostic factors of survival in pediatric post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) after solid organ transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective case analysis of 55 pediatric solid organ graft recipients (kidney, liver, heart/lung) developing PTLD were reported to the German Pediatric-PTLD registry. Patient charts were analyzed for tumor characteristics (histology, immunophenotypes, cytogenetics, Epstein-Barr virus [EBV] detection), stage, treatment, and outcome. Probability of overall and event-free survival was analyzed in defined subgroups using univariate and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

PTLD was diagnosed at a median time of 29 months after organ transplantation, with a significantly shorter lag time in liver (0.83 years) versus heart or renal graft recipients (3.33 and 3.10 years, respectively; P = .001). The 5-year overall and event-free survival was 68% and 59%, respectively, with 59% of patients surviving 10 years. Stage IV disease with bone marrow and/or CNS involvement was associated independently with poor survival (P = .0005). No differences in outcome were observed between early- and late-onset PTLD, monomorphic or polymorphic PTLD, and EBV-positive or EBV-negative PTLD, respectively. Patients with Burkitt or Burkitt-like PTLD and c-myc translocations had short survival (< 1 year).

CONCLUSION

Stage IV disease is an independent risk factor for poor survival in pediatric PTLD patients. Prospective multicenter trials are needed to delineate additional risk factors and to assess treatment approaches for pediatric PTLD.

Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders After Liver Transplantation: Analysis of Early and Late Cases in a 255 Patient Series

We reviewed the incidence and the impact of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) on patient survival among a consecutive series of 255 patients. Five cases of PTLD were observed in adults: two cases were early (less than 1 year) and three cases, late lymphomas. The EBV positivity and the degree of immunosuppression were the main risk factors. We labeled cases as early or late according to whether the time elapsed from the transplant to the first clinical evidence of PTLD was less than 12 months. The median time from transplant to diagnosis of PTLD was 8 (early) and 108 (late) months. All cases were treated by reduction in immunosuppressive therapy with conventional chemotherapy and rituximab. The early cases with lymphoma located at the hepatic hilum died due to local complications (biliary sepsis and hemobilia), after an initial partial response to chemotherapy. The three patients with late cases are in remission after a mean follow-up of 23 months.

Complete Regression of Cutaneous B-Cell Lymphoma in a Renal Transplant Patient After Conversion From Cyclosporin to Sirolimus

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease remains a serious morbidity. Herein we have reported a case of complete regression of a biopsy-proven B-cell lymphoma that occurred in the posttransplant period. A 48-year-old man received a living donor renal transplant for end-stage renal disease due to undetermined etiology. His initial immunosuppression consisted of corticosteroid, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclosporin. The patient developed severe pneumonia within the first 2 months after transplantation due to Acineotobacter, fungus, and cytomegalovirus infections. He experienced a complete recovery and was discharged for regional follow-up. Four months after discharge, he was referred again because of presence of two nodules on his trunk. A biopsy of the nodules revealed B-cell lymphoma. Cyclosporin was stopped and he was converted to sirolimus. The lesions regressed progressively and completely within 7 weeks. The patient remains well without clinical relapses at 19 months after conversion. Renal functions remained stable. We postulated that the antincoplastic properties of sirolimus may have played an active part in the positive outcome.

Critical care perspective on immunotherapy in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is now a viable therapeutic option in the care of patients with advanced pulmonary parenchymal or pulmonary vascular disease. Lung transplantation, however, with chronic posttransplant immunosuppression, creates a uniquely vulnerable population of patients likely to experience significant life-threatening complications requiring intensive care. The introduction of several novel immunosuppressive agents, such as sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, in conjunction with more established agents such as cyclosporine and tacrolimus, has greatly increased treatment options for lung transplant recipients and likely contributed to improved short-term transplant outcomes. Modern transplant immunosuppression, however, is associated with a host of complications such as opportunistic infections, renal failure, and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. The main focus of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of modern immunotherapy in lung transplantation and to increase awareness of the serious and potentially life-threatening complications of these medications.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder is the most common malignancy, with the exception of skin cancer, after solid organ transplantation in adults. The incidence varies according to the transplanted organ and is often associated with Epstein-Barr virus. Prognosis is variable, due in part to the heterogeneity of the disease, which ranges from reactive plasmacytic hyperplasia to aggressive monoclonal disease.

Human plasmacytoid dendritic cells regulate immune responses to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and delay EBV-related mortality in humanized NOD-SCID mice

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), which is a leading cause of cancer death in recipients of transplants. We investigated the role of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs) in the development of EBV infection and the onset of lymphoproliferative disease (LPD) in humanized NOD-SCID mice and studied the effect of EBV on PDC function. NOD-SCID mice reconstituted with PDC-depleted peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from EBV IgG+ human donors had significantly enhanced mortality from disseminated EBV infection (median survival, 43 days) compared to PBMC-only mice (median survival, 72 days; log-rank P<.05). Mice reconstituted with PDC-enriched PBMCs challenged with EBV exhibited delayed mortality from EBV-LPD (median survival, 80 days) compared to PBMC-only mice challenged with EBV (median survival, 50 days; log-rank P<.05). EBV-stimulated pDCs produced interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) and promoted the activation of natural killer cells and IFN-gamma-producing CD3+T cells. PDC activation of CD3+T cells in response to EBV stimulation was dependent on cell-to-cell contact, in part mediated by toll-like receptor 9 (TLR-9) signaling that was inhibited by chloroquine and TLR-9 inhibitory CpG. Thus, PDCs play an important role in anti-EBV cellular immune responses that may be targets for manipulation in novel strategies for the treatment of PTLD.

Long-term survival in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders with a dose-adjusted ACVBP regimen

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are severe complications after solid organ transplantation with no consensus on best treatment practice. Chemotherapy is a therapeutic option with a high response and a significant relapse rate leading to a low long-term tolerance rate. Currently, most centres use anthracycline-based drug combinations, such as CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone). We assessed the efficacy and safety of a dose-adjusted ACVBP (doxorubicin reduced to 50 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide adjusted to renal function, vindesine, bleomycin, prednisone) regimen in patients failing to respond to a reduction in immunosuppressive therapy. Favourable responses were observed in 24 (73%) of the 33 treated patients. Fourteen (42%) patients died, mostly from PTLD progression. Actuarial survival was 60% at 5 years and 55% at 10 years. Survival prognostic factors were: number of involved sites (P = 0.007), clinical stage III/IV (P = 0.004), bulky tumour (P < 0.0001), B symptoms (P = 0.03), decreased serum albumin (P = 0.03) and poor performance status (P = 0.06). Both the international and the PTLD prognostic index were predictive for survival (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). Overall 128 cycles were given. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was recorded after 26 (20%) chemotherapy cycles in 19 (58%) patients. Forty-one (32%) infections were recorded in 26 (79%) patients. This study demonstrated that an individual dose-adjustment of ACVBP regimen was manageable in PTLD patients and favourably impacted on long-term survival.

Review of Epstein–Barr virus and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder post-solid organ transplantation (Review Article)

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) following solid organ transplantation is an important form of post-transplant malignancy. PTLD is typically associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and occurs in the setting of profound immunosuppression resulting in a deficiency of EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). Predisposing factors include EBV mismatch between donor and recipient, use of immunosuppression especially T-cell depletive therapies and genetic predisposition of recipients. The standard approach has been to reduce immunosuppression but is often insufficient to induce tumour regression. Further understanding of the immunobiology of PTLD has resulted in improved monitoring techniques (including EBV viral load determined by polymerase chain reaction) and newer treatment options. Recent work has highlighted a potential role for dendritic cells in both the pathogenesis and treatment of PTLD. Current treatment modalities include adoptive immunotherapy using ex vivo generated autologous EBV-specific CTL or allogeneic CTL, cytokine therapies, antiviral agents, and more recently, rituximab and dendritic-cell based therapies. This review focuses on the developments and progress in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of PTLD.

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder of the lung in a renal transplant recipient treated successfully with surgery

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are a heterogeneous group of lymphoid diseases that occur after solid organ and bone marrow transplantation. Lung-located PTLD has been reported in recipients of the heart, cord blood stem cells, lungs, and bone marrow transplants, but only four cases were reported previously after kidney transplantation. Thoracic location of PTLD must be regarded as an especially dangerous complication. The pathogenesis, and clinical and histological features of PTLD remain poorly defined but predisposing risk factors are becoming better understood. Namely, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and immunosuppressive agents appear to be such risk factors. There has been marginal success in treating PTLD using a number of treatment modalities, including combination chemotherapy with anti-CD20 or high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue. We report a renal allograft recipient transplanted in March 2000, diagnosed with EBV-associated and lung-located PTLD. His initial immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, azathioprine, and steroids. Azathioprine was withdrawn in September 2001. In November 2001 a high-resolution computed tomography scan revealed two round masses in the right lung. The patient underwent right thoracotomy and resection of the lower and middle lobe. The diagnosis of PTLD was settled by intraoperative histopathological evaluation. The postoperative histological assessment confirmed the diagnosis and revealed positive staining for EBV. The patient remained in complete remission for 3 years with a well-functioning renal allograft, with current serum creatinine of 1.2 mg%. This case illustrates that the treatment of lung-located PTLD may be successful, but it depends on a combination of prompt diagnosis, reduction of immunosuppression, and of course surgery.

Management of patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: the role of rituximab

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a serious complication of solid organ and bone marrow transplantations. Rituximab (Rituxan, Mabthera), a chimeric monoclonal antibody to the CD20 antigen on the surface of B-cell lymphocytes, has been used increasingly in the treatment of PTLD. Rituximab was initially approved for the treatment of low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphomas, but multiple case studies, retrospective analyses, and phase II trials demonstrate the benefit of rituximab in PTLD. This paper reviews the current data on rituximab and its promising role in the management of PTLD.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is an increasingly recognized complication of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. PTLD represents a spectrum of polyclonal and monoclonal lymphoproliferation, generally of B cells. Prompt diagnosis is key and requires a high index of suspicion. An increasing variety of highly effective therapies, including immune modulation via reduction in immunosuppression, monoclonal antibodies, and cellular therapy, have dramatically improved the cure rates of this once devastating disease.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) after solid organ transplantation

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are a well-recognised and potentially fatal complication after solid organ transplantation. They include a spectrum of disorders ranging from benign hyperplasia to invasive malignant lymphoma. The majority of cases are associated with Epstein Barr virus (EBV)-driven tumour formation in B cells and are a consequence of the detrimental effect of immunosuppressive agents on the immune-control of EBV. This review provides an update on the pathogenesis and clinical features of PTLD after solid organ transplantation and discusses recent progress in management. Reduction in immunosuppressive therapy remains a key component of therapy for EBV-positive PTLD and may lead to remission in early disease. Chemotherapy is used when reduced immunosuppression fails to control early disease and as initial therapy for many cases of late disease. Unfortunately, the mortality for PTLD that fails to respond to a reduction in immunosuppression remains high. Newer treatments include manipulation of the cytokine environment, B lymphocyte depleting antibodies and adoptive T cell immunotherapy using allogeneic or autologous EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Although early results appear promising, well-designed clinical trials are needed to assess the efficacy of these novel approaches. EBV vaccination may in the future prove an effective prophylaxis against EBV-driven PTLD but until then, avoiding excessive immunosuppressive therapy may help minimise the risk of PTLD.

Lymphoproliferative Disease After Lung and Heart-Lung Transplantation: First Description in Spain

Lymphoproliferative syndromes are the most common tumors in transplant recipients. More than 90% of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative syndromes (PTLS) are considered to be associated with Epstein-Barr virus, and 86% are of the B-cell line. Histopathology ranges from polymorphic-reactive to monomorphic forms. Clonality should be studied using molecular biology techniques. Clinically, a differentiation is usually made between early PTLS (occurring within 1 year after transplantation) and late PTLS, which occur as localized or disseminated nodal lymphomas. In localized forms, immunosuppression should be discontinued or decreased, and the involved area should be subsequently resected or irradiated. In disseminated cases, immunosuppression should be decreased and administration of acyclovir/ganciclovir should be considered. If this is not effective, treatment should be started with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (rituximab). If no response occurs, use of chemotherapy, possibly with interferon, should be considered. Our aim was to report the incidence, clinical signs, and treatment in a series of patients undergoing lung transplantation (LTx).

Low-Dose Chemotherapy for Epstein-Barr Virus–Positive Post-Transplantation Lymphoproliferative Disease in Children After Solid Organ Transplantation

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of a low-dose chemotherapy regimen in children with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) –positive, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) after organ transplantation who have experienced failure with front-line therapy for PTLD.

Patients and Methods

Eligible patients received cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2 intravenous for 1 day) and prednisone (2 mg/kg orally for 5 days) every 3 weeks for six cycles.

Results

Thirty-six patients treated on study were assessable for analyses. Front-line therapies for PTLD before study entry included immune suppression reduction or withdrawal (n = 36), antiviral therapy (n = 33), surgical resection (n = 8), rituximab (n = 2), and interferon alfa (n = 1). Reasons for failure of front-line therapy included progressive disease (PD; n = 33) and persistent disease with concurrent allograft rejection (n = 3). Thirty patients (83%) had stage III to IV disease, 92% had extranodal disease, and 75% had ≥ three sites of disease. The overall response rate was 83% (75% complete response + 8% partial response). The relapse rate was 19%, with only one of five relapsed patients alive and disease-free. Four patients presented with fulminant, disseminated PTLD; only one of these four patients achieved a response, and all four died of PD. Two patients died of treatment-related toxicity. Three patients (8%) experienced allograft loss, but two of the three patients are alive and disease-free after a second transplantation. The 2-year overall, relapse-free, and failure-free (without PTLD and with functioning original allograft) survival rates were 73%, 69%, and 67%, respectively.

Conclusion

This low-dose chemotherapy regimen is effective for children with EBV-positive, nonfulminant PTLD who have experienced treatment failure with front-line therapy, and this study represents the largest series of PTLD patients treated prospectively with a uniform chemotherapy regimen.

Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Pancreas Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a rare, serious complication of transplantation. The characteristics and associations of this disease in pancreas recipients have not been extensively studied.

METHODS

From January 1988 through December 2002, 787 pancreas and 569 kidney-pancreas transplants were performed at our institution. Eighteen pancreas recipients developed polymorphic PTLD or malignant lymphoma. Data on clinical course, organ involvement, molecular characteristics, and association with immunosuppression and recent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection were compiled from the institutional transplant database. Patient survival was compared to recipients of liver and kidney transplants at the same center by using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The 5-year cumulative incidence of PTLD in simultaneous pancreas-kidney, pancreas after kidney, and pancreas transplant alone recipients was 2.5%, 1.2%, and 1.0%, respectively (P = 0.23). A noticeably, but not significantly, higher cumulative incidence was seen in the more recent era since 1995 (2.1% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.15). PTLD in pancreas recipients carried a worse prognosis than in liver or kidney for recipients B-cell, early-onset, and Epstein Barr virus-positive lesions. PTLD was more aggressive in pancreas recipients, with a higher stage at presentation and a trend to more bone marrow involvement. There appeared to be a tendency toward association with recent CMV infection. Since 1995, PTLD recipients have had a lower exposure to antilymphocyte preparations (25 +/- 5 vs. 10 +/- 0.8)(P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PTLD in pancreas recipients remains a rare but aggressive disease, and carries a worse prognosis in comparison to other transplant recipients. These heavily immunosuppressed patients, who often face multiple transplants, may be at greater risk; CMV infection may play an antecedent role.