Long-term impact of superinfection by hepatitis G virus in hepatitis C virus-positive renal transplant patients

Human pegivirus infection after transplant: Is there an impact?

The microbiome's role in transplantation has received growing interest, but the role of virome remains understudied. Pegiviruses are single-stranded positive-sense RNA viruses, historically associated with liver disease, but their path-ogenicity is controversial. In the transplantation setting, pegivirus infection does not seem to have a negative impact on the outcomes of solid-organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. However, the role of pegiviruses as proxies in immunosuppression monitoring brings novelty to the field of virome research in immunocompromised individuals. The possible immunomodulatory effect of pegivirus infections remains to be elucidated in further trials.

[Management of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection in chronic kidney failure]

Chronic infections by hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) result in diagnosis and therapeutic issues in dialysis and kidney recipients patients. The exposure to nosocomial, including blood transfusion, risk explains the high prevalence of HBV and HCV infection in this setting. Chronic infection reduces the survival of both patients and allografts, including a specific risk of de novo glomerulonephritis. Cirrhosis was considered as a contra-indication to renal transplantation given the high risk of decompensation and death, questionning the indication of a combined liver and kidney transplantation. Thus, it is mandatory to screen HBV and HCV markers in all dialysis patients, whether or not they are candidates to transplantation. Liver biopsy allows evaluating the severity of the liver disease since the noninvasive markers of fibrosis appear to be less accurate in "renal" patients than in the general population and to better define antiviral therapeutic indications. HCV treatment was mainly based on pegylated interferon α (and low doses of ribavirin), which is contra-indicated in kidney recipients given the risk of graft rejection; HCV treatment is now based on the use of oral direct acting antivirals, which are very potent and well tolerated. HBV replication is now easily suppressed by second-generation nucleos(t)tidic analogues (entecavir and tenofovir), which will be indicated in all the dialysis patients with significant fibrosis (F2,3 or 4 according to the Metavir scoring system) and in any candidate to renal transplantation and to any HBsAg-positive kidney recipients. The best treatment remains preventive by anti-HBV vaccination for HBV and by the respect of universal hygiene rules for HCV.

Interferon-based anti-viral therapy for hepatitis C virus infection after renal transplantation: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highly prevalent in renal transplant (RT) recipients. Currently, interferon-based (IFN-based) antiviral therapies are the standard approach to control HCV infection. In a post-transplantation setting, however, IFN-based therapies appear to have limited efficacy and their use remains controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IFN-based therapies for HCV infection post RT.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and The Cochrane Library (1997-2013) for clinical trials in which transplant patients were given Interferon (IFN), pegylated interferon (PEG), interferon plus ribavirin (IFN-RIB), or pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (PEG-RIB). The Sustained Virological Response (SVR) and/or drop-out rates were the primary outcomes. Summary estimates were calculated using the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 12 clinical trials (140 patients in total). The summary estimate for SVR rate, drop-out rate and graft rejection rate was 26.6% (95%CI, 15.0-38.1%), 21.1% (95% CI, 10.9-31.2%) and 4% (95%CI: 0.8%-7.1%), respectively. The overall SVR rate in PEG-based and standard IFN-based therapy was 40.6% (24/59) and 20.9% (17/81), respectively. The most frequent side-effect requiring discontinuation of treatment was graft dysfunction (14 cases, 45.1%). Meta-regression analysis showed the covariates included contribute to the heterogeneity in the SVR logit rate, but not in the drop-out logit rate. The sensitivity analyses by the random model yielded very similar results to the fixed-effects model.

CONCLUSIONS

IFN-based therapy for HCV infection post RT has poor efficacy and limited safety. PEG-based therapy is a more effective approach for treating HCV infection post-RT than standard IFN-based therapy. Future research is required to develop novel strategies to improve therapeutic efficacy and tolerability, and reduce the liver-related morbidity and mortality in this important patient population.

[The evolution of the hypervariable region-1 of hepatitis C virus may predict liver fibrosis outcome after renal transplantation]

The aim of our study was to assess hepatitis C virus (HCV) evolution and long term liver histology outcome in anti-HCV(+)/RNA(+) renal-transplant (RT) patients. Fifty-five anti-HCV(+)/RNA(+) RT patients underwent every 3-4 years after transplantation liver biopsies (LB) (2 LBs, N = 55; 3 LBs, N = 44; 4 LBs, N = 10). The hypervariable region (HVR)-1 of the HCV genome from all patients was characterized over time. Overall, the rate of liver fibrosis progression was 0.07 +/- 0.03 Metavir units/year. We identified three groups of patients: those in whom liver fibrosis remained stable (group I, N = 21), those with progressing liver fibrosis (group II, N = 21), and those with a regression in liver fibrosis (group III, N = 13). Initial fibrosis stage and high diversification of the HVR-1 of HCV genome between the transplantation and the first liver biopsy were independent factors associated with liver fibrosis regression. In conclusion, in this study, after renal transplantation, HCV infection is not harmful upon liver histology in more than fifty percent of the patients. The diversification of the HVR-1 of the HCV genome might be used to predict liver fibrosis outcome.

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Fibrotest in Hemodialysis and Renal Transplant Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus

BACKGROUND

An accurate diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver lesions is mandatory in dialysis patients and kidney recipients to better define the treatment of and contraindications to kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the fibrotest (a noninvasive method to assess liver fibrosis in HCV on a scale from 0 to 1) in hemodialysis and renal transplant patients infected by chronic HCV.

METHODS

In all, 110 patients with biopsy-proven HCV (60 renal transplant recipients and 50 hemodialysis patients), determined using the METAVIR scoring system, were studied.

RESULTS

Forty-six percent of patients had fibrosis > or =F2. A positive predictive value of a score >0.6 for the presence of significant fibrosis by comparison with liver biopsy was 71%, and an negative predictive value of < 0.2 for excluding significant fibrosis was 77%, respectively. The areas under the ROC curves for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis were 0.66, 0.47, and 0.71 in the global population, hemodialysis patients, and renal transplant patients, respectively. In all, 75% of patients were correctly classified using the fibrotest. If biopsy was restricted to scores in the intermediate range (< 0.6 and >0.2), the index could reduce the indication for biopsy by 47%. The results did not differ significantly in hemodialysis and renal transplant patients.

CONCLUSION

The fibrotest has a diagnostic value in hemodialysis and renal transplant patients which is similar to that reported in the general population (75%) and its use could avoid 32% of liver biopsies if it were interpreted in detail in nephrology patients.

Natural history of hepatitis C virus-related liver fibrosis after renal transplantation

The aim of our study was to assess hepatitis C virus (HCV) evolution and long-term liver histology outcome in anti-HCV(+)/RNA(+) renal transplant (RT) patients. A total of 51 anti-HCV(+)/RNA(+) RT patients underwent liver biopsies (LB) every 3-4 years after transplantation (two LBs, n = 51; three LBs, n = 42; four LBs, n = 9). The hypervariable region (HVR)-1 of the HCV genome from all patients was characterized over time. Overall, the rate of liver fibrosis progression was 0.09 +/- 0.03 Metavir units/year. We identified three groups of patients: those in whom liver fibrosis remained stable (n = 21), those with progressing liver fibrosis (n = 21) and those with a regression in liver fibrosis (n = 10). In the last two groups, the progression and the regression of liver fibrosis were gradual during follow-up. Ferritin levels and hepatosiderosis were significantly higher in fibrosers. Initial fibrosis stage and high diversification of the HVR-1 of HCV genome between transplantation and the first liver biopsy were independent factors associated with liver fibrosis regression. In conclusion, in the current study, more than 10 years after renal transplantation, HCV infection was not harmful upon liver histology in more than 50% of patients. The diversification of the HVR-1 might be used to predict liver fibrosis outcome.

Using Live Pathogens to Treat Infectious Diseases: A Historical Perspective on the Relationship between Gb Virus C and HIV

Recent reports that co-infection with GB virus C (GBV-C) is associated with a reduced mortality in HIV-infected individuals, a slower progression to AIDS, and lower HIV viral loads, suggest a potential role of GBV-C as therapy for HIV infection. Although not known to cause any human disease, GBV-C was only recently discovered and prospective studies assessing long-term consequences of infection have not been completed. Our understanding of the host-viral interactions between humans and GBV-C is in its infancy. Further research into the intriguing relationship between GBV-C and HIV is needed before intentional inoculation of GBV-C into individuals infected with HIV should proceed. This essay explores the history of the once-popular treatment of paretic tertiary syphilis with the blood-borne pathogen Plasmodium vivax, providing a historical perspective on the current state of affairs between GBV-C and HIV. A brief review of GBV-C biology and human infection is followed by a discussion of the current challenges facing the use of this organism to treat HIV.

Infections in recipients of kidney transplants

A review of infections in kidney transplant recipients is presented in this article, beginning with a discussion of the pretransplant infectious diseases evaluation and an overview of the timing of infectious posttransplant, and then focusing on individual types of infection.

High prevalence, low pathogenicity of hepatitis G virus in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Prevalence and pathogenicity of hepatitis G virus infection in long-term renal transplant recipients, are not fully known.

AIM

To evaluate long-term impact of HGV infection on liver disease of renal transplanted patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 155 hepatitis B surface antigen negative kidney transplant recipients, followed for a mean of 11 years after renal transplantation, were studied. Of these 48 (31%) patients had persistently elevated serum aminotransferase values. Frozen serum samples were tested for HGV-RNA and HCV-RNA by nested reverse transcribed polymerase chain reaction, and for anti-hepatitis G virus and anti-hepatitis C virus by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Hepatitis C virus-RNA was typed by a line probe assay and quantified by a branched DNA signal amplification assay

RESULTS

Hepatitis G virus-RNA was detected in 37 (24%) patients and anti-hepatitis G virus in another 26 (17%). Seventy (45%) patients had serum anti-hepatitis C virus and 63 of these (90%) had serum hepatitis C virus-RNA. Hepatitis G virus-RNA positive and negative patients were similar in terms of age, sex, duration of dialysis, rate of transfusion, chronic liver disease, rate of hepatitis C virus infection and immunosuppressive therapy. Fifteen (41%) hepatitis G virus-RNA seropositive patients were hepatitis C virus co-infected. Hepatitis C virus-RNA levels were significantly lower in the 15 hepatitis C virus/hepatitis G virus co-infected patients than in the 48 patients with hepatitis C virus infection only (2.2 vs 10.8 MEq/ml, p = 0.02). Only 3 hepatitis G virus carriers had persistently elevated alanine aminotransferase compared to 29 hepatitis C virus carriers (14% vs 60%, p < 0.001), 10 patients co-infected with both hepatitis G virus and hepatitis C virus, and in 6 patients with neither infection (67% vs 8%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis G virus infection is common among kidney transplant patients, it carries a low risk of chronic liver disease even in long-term follow-up. Low levels of hepatitis C virus-RNA found in hepatitis G virus carriers suggest an interaction between these two viruses in immunosuppressed patients.

Infections associated with dialysis and transplantation

Infection within the abdominal wall and peritonitis are still important causes of morbidity which ultimately limit the use of peritoneal dialysis in end-stage renal failure. Similarly disastrous complications resulting in loss of access can follow infection in venous cannulae and artificial arteriovenous fistulae, particularly in synthetic vascular grafts. Important publications continue to underline the mechanism of reduced resistance to infection by uraemic patients. After renal transplantation bacterial infection is common and predictable. However, immunosuppressed recipients are particularly susceptible to viral and fungal infection. Arguably infection of all types can induce organ rejection.