Safe transplantation of blood type A2 livers to blood type O recipients

Outcomes after ABO incompatible pediatric liver transplantation are comparable to ABO identical/compatible transplant

Background

ABO incompatible (ABOi) liver transplantation (LT) was initially associated with a higher incidence of vascular, biliary, and rejection complications and a lower survival than ABO compatible (ABOc) LT. Various protocols have been proposed to manage anti-isohemagglutinin antibodies and hyperacute rejection. We present our experience with a simplified protocol using only plasmapheresis.

Methods

A retrospective review of all patients who received an ABOi LT at our institution was performed. Comparisons were made based on era (early: 1997-2008, modern: 2009-2020) and severity of disease (status 1 vs. exception PELD at transplant). A pair-matched comparison was done to patients who received an ABOc LT. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

17 patients received 18 ABOi LT (3 retransplants). Median age at transplant was 7.4 months (1.1-28.9). 66.7% patients were listed as status 1. Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) occurred in one patient (5.6%), there were 2 cases of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) (11.1%), and 2 biliary strictures (11.1%). Patient and graft survival improved in the ABOi modern era, although not significantly. In the pair-matched comparison, complications (HAT p = 0.29; PVT p = 0.37; biliary complications p = 0.15) and survival rates were similar. Patient and graft survivals were 100% in the non-status 1 ABOi patients compared to 67% (p = 0.11) and 58% (p = 0.081) respectively for patients who were transplanted as status 1.

Conclusion

ABO incompatible liver transplants in infants with a high PELD score have excellent outcomes. Indications for ABO incompatible transplants should be liberalized to prevent deaths on the waiting list or deterioration of children with high PELD scores.

The fate of donor-type ABO blood group antigen expression in liver grafts in ABO-incompatible adult living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Donor-type ABO blood group antigens (dABOAgs) have been detected in ABO-incompatible adult living donor liver transplantation (ABOi ALDLT) grafts, but their fate and role in ABOi ALDLT rejection remain uncertain.

METHODS

The 0-day, <1-month, and 1-year serial liver graft biopsies from 30 ABOi ALDLT recipients were retrospectively evaluated. ABO antigen expression was quantitatively and serially measured by the mean number of positively stained vascular structures (endothelium of the capillaries, arteries, hepatic veins, and portal veins) within the portal tracts (sS).

RESULTS

The dABOAg sS counts of 0-day, <1-month, and 1-year liver graft biopsies (32.3, 20.8, and 20.6, respectively) decreased significantly (p < .001). Early rejection in the <1-month biopsy was observed in 8/30 (26.7%) recipients, four (13.3%) of whom showed antibody-mediated rejection. The sS counts tended to rebound in grafts showing early rejection, with minimal changes from the 0-day to <1-month period, but increased to pre-transplantation levels after 1 year, compared to that in grafts without early rejection (36.0, 20.4, 19.6 vs. 23.7, 21.9, 23.0, respectively; p = .040).

CONCLUSIONS

While dABOAg expression decreased after ABOi ALDLT, recipients showing early rejection showed sustained graft dABOAg expression. Therefore, dABOAg expression may be involved in the mechanism of accommodation in ABOi transplantation.

ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplant From a Blood Type A2 Donor to a Type B Recipient: A Note of Caution

Standardization of immunomodulation protocols has enabled ABO-incompatible liver transplants with outcomes similar to those of ABO-compatible liver transplants. Patients with the A2 blood group are unique because they have a diminished expression of the A antigen. Despite rare immune complications, this phenomenon of diminished expression has led to treatment of type A2 donors according to the regimen for type O blood group donors in ABO-incompatible liver transplants. Additionally, the requirement for pretransplant recipient immunomodulation is consi dered minimal when considering these donors. The transplant of a type A2 donor kidney to a type B recipient is well recognized; however, for liver donation the A2-to-B transplant is rare. Here, we present a case of 48-year-old male patient with blood group type B who underwent ABO-incompatible liver transplant of a right lobe liver graft from a type A2 donor. Postoperatively, despite adequate immunosuppression and initiation of thera - peutic plasma exchange, the patient developed severe and refractory antibody-mediated rejection that ultimately abated with a splenectomy. This report highlights the low but tangible risk of antibody-mediated rejection in ABO-incompatible liver transp lants from type A2 donors and emphasizes the importance of serial monitoring of anti-A isohemag glutinin titers and posttransplant splenectomy to ensure that liver grafts with antibody-mediated rejection can be rescued.

ABO-Incompatible Liver Transplantation - A Review of the Historical Background and Results

ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ABOi LT) using conventional immunosuppression has been considered a contraindication due to the high risk for antibody-mediated complications potentially resulting in graft loss. However, organ shortage has led to the development of anti-A/B antibody reducing immunosuppressive protocols which have made the outcome after living donor (LD) ABOi LT equivalent to that achieved with LD ABO-compatible (ABOc). The experience of deceased donor (DD) ABOi LT is however still limited. In this article, we discuss the historical background and the results after ABOi LT, in the setting of both LD and DD transplantation. We also discuss the remaining hurdles and future strategies in the breaching of the ABO barrier for LT.

Liver transplantation with deceased ABO-incompatible donors is life-saving but associated with increased risk of rejection and post-transplant complications

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) liver transplantation (LT) with deceased donor organs is performed occasionally when no ABO-compatible (ABOc) graft is available. From 1996 to 2011, 61 ABOi LTs were performed in Oslo and Gothenburg. Median patient age was 51 years (range 13-75); 33 patients were transplanted on urgent indications, 13 had malignancy-related indications, and eight received ABOi grafts for urgent retransplantations. Median donor age was 55 years (range 10-86). Forty-four patients received standard triple immunosuppression with steroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil, and forty-four patients received induction with IL-2 antagonist or anti-CD20 antibody. Median follow-up time was 29 months (range 0-200). The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of patient survival (PS) and graft survival (GS) were 85/71%, 79/57%, 75/55%, and 59/51%, respectively, compared to 90/87%, 84/79%, 79/73%, and 65/60% for all other LT recipients in the same period. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year GS for A2 grafts were 81%, 67%, 62%, and 57%, respectively. In conclusion, ABOi LT performed with non-A2 grafts is associated with inferior graft survival and increased risk of rejection, vascular and biliary complications. ABOi LT with A2 grafts is associated with acceptable graft survival and can be used safely in urgent cases.

A2 /A2 B to B Renal Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future Directions

One component of the new national kidney allocation system (KAS) in the United States that was implemented on December 4, 2014, was the allocation of kidneys from A2 and A2 B (A, non-A1 and AB, non-A1 B) deceased donors into blood group B candidates (A2 /A2 B → B). In so far as this is an important component of the new KAS that has the potential to further increase the access to transplantation for blood group B candidates on the waiting list, most of whom are minority candidates, we will review the body of evidence and historical perspectives that led to its inclusion in the new KAS. This review will also describe prospects for more widespread use of A2 /A2 B → B transplantation and a novel mechanism of humoral immunosuppression in B patients before and after transplantation with an A2 or A2 B kidney.

Molecular deciphering of the ABO system as a basis for novel diagnostics and therapeutics in ABO incompatible transplantation

In recent years ABO incompatible kidney transplantation (KTx) has become a more or less clinical routine procedure with graft and patient survival similar to those of ABO compatible transplants. Antigen-specific immunoadsorption (IA) for anti-A and anti-B antibody removal constitutes in many centers an important part of the treatment protocol. ABO antibody titration by hemagglutination is guiding the treatment; both if the recipient can be transplanted as well as in cases of suspected rejections if antibody removal should be performed. Despite the overall success of ABO incompatible KTx, there is still room for improvements and an extension of the technology to include other solid organs. Based on an increased understanding of the structural complexity and tissue distribution of ABH antigens and the fine epitope specificity of the ABO antibody repertoire, improved IA matrices and ABO antibody diagnostics should be developed. Furthermore, understanding the molecular mechanisms behind accommodation of ABO incompatible renal allografts could make it possible to induce long-term allograft acceptance also in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitized recipients and, perhaps, also make clinical xenotransplantation possible.

Safety of blood group A2-to-O liver transplantation: an analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing database

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible organ transplantation typically induces hyperacute rejection. A2-to-O liver transplantations have been successful. This study compared overall and graft survival in O recipients of A2 and O grafts based on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data.

METHODS

Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data were used. The first A2-to-O liver transplantation was entered on March 11, 1990; all previous transplantations were excluded. Between March 11, 1990, and September 3, 2010, 43,335 O recipients underwent transplanation, of whom 358 received A2 grafts.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, sex, and race between the groups. Recipients of A2 grafts versus O grafts were significantly more likely to be hospitalized at transplantation (45% vs. 38%, P≤0.05) and to have a higher mean (SD) model for end-stage liver disease score (24 [11] vs. 22 [10], P≤0.05). 10% of A2 recipients and 9% of O recipients underwent retransplantation. No significant differences existed in rejection during the transplantation admission and at 12 months: 7% versus 6% and 20% versus 22% for A2 recipients and O recipients, respectively; and there were no significant differences in contributing factors to graft failure or cause of death. At 5 years, overall survival of A2 and O graft recipients was 77% and 74%, respectively (log rank=0.71). At 5 years, graft survival was 66% in both groups (log rank=0.52). Donor blood group was insignificant on Cox regression for overall and graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we present the largest series of A2-to-O liver transplantations and conclude this mismatch option to be safe with similar overall and graft survival. This opens possibilities to further meet the demands of a shrinking organ supply, especially with regard to expanding living-donor options.

Blood group A isoagglutinins in A(2) → O simultaneous liver/kidney transplantation may not influence kidney function

We simultaneously transplanted a liver and kidney (SLK) into a 55-year-old woman with end-stage liver disease secondary to recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis. The patient was blood group O, the donor was A(2) (A, non-A1) and the patient's A isoagglutinin titer was 512. Good renal function was evident by normalization of her creatinine values following transplantation. Recovery was unremarkable and she was discharged on post op day 9. The patient has not experienced an episode of rejection in either organ during the 6 months of follow-up. This case is important because high A IgG isoagglutinin levels (8 or higher) in kidney alone A(2) → O transplantation are detrimental to outcome but do not affect outcome in liver alone A(2) → O transplants; however, no such anti-A titer data have been published for A(2) → O (or B) SLK transplantation.

Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation with ABO-Incompatible Grafts: A German Single Center Experience

Adult living donor liver transplantations (ALDLTs) across the ABO blood group barrier have been reported in Asia, North Americas, and Europe, but not yet in Germany. Several strategies have been established to overcome the detrimental effects that are attached with such a disparity between donor and host, but no gold standard has yet emerged. Here, we present the first experiences with three ABO-incompatible adult living donor liver transplantations in Germany applying different immunosuppressive strategies. Four patient-donor couples were considered for ABO-incompatible ALDLT. In these patients, resident ABO blood group antibodies (isoagglutinins) were depleted by plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption and replenishment was inhibited by splenectomy and/or B-cell-targeted immunosuppression. Despite different treatments ALDLT could safely be performed in three patients and all patients had good initial graft function without signs for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Two patients had long-term graft survival with stable graft function. We thus propose the feasibility of ABO-incompatible ALDLT with these protocols and advocate further expansion of ABO incompatible ALDLT in multicenter trials to improve efficacy and safety.

ABO-incompatible deceased donor liver transplantation in the United States: a national registry analysis

In the United States, ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ILT) is limited to emergent situations when ABO-compatible liver transplantation (CLT) is unavailable. We analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing database of ILT performed from 1990-2006 to assess ILT outcomes for infant (0-1 years; N = 156), pediatric (2-17 years; N = 170), and adult (> 17 years; N = 667) patients. Since 2000, the number of ILT has decreased annually, and there has been decreased use of blood type B donors and increased use of blood type A donors. Furthermore, ILT graft survival has improved for all age groups in recent years, beyond the improved graft survival attributable to era effect based on comparison to respective age group CLT. On matched control analysis, graft survival was significantly worse for adult ILT as compared to adult CLT. However, infant and pediatric ILTs did not have worse graft survival versus age-matched CLT. Adjusted analyses identified age-specific characteristics impacting ILT graft loss. For infants, transplant after 2000 and donor age < 9 years were associated with reduced risk of ILT graft loss. For pediatric patients, female recipient sex and donor age > 50 years were associated with increased risk of ILT graft loss. For adults, life support, repeat transplant, split grafts, and hepatocellular carcinoma were associated with increased risk of ILT graft loss. The current study identifies important trends in ILT in the United States in the modern immunosuppression era, as well as specific recipient, donor, and graft characteristics impacting ILT graft survival that could be utilized to guide ILT organ allocation in exigent circumstances. Liver Transpl 15:883-893, 2009. (c) 2009 AASLD.

Neutralization of blood group A-antigen by a novel anti-A antibody: overcoming ABO-incompatible solid-organ transplantation

BACKGROUND

The major barrier to ABO-incompatible solid-organ transplantation is acute humoral rejection. It is known to be triggered by antidonor blood group A/B antibodies, which might bind to A/B-antigen on the endothelium of the graft. Various strategies to reduce antiblood group antibody by overcoming ABO-incompatible transplantation have been tried. However, antigen-suppressing procedures have not been performed.

METHODS

We produced a novel anti-A antibody (K7508) by immunizing mice with salivary mucin of a blood group A individual, thereby clarifying that blood group A-antigen is expressed in endothelial cells of the liver. We investigated whether K7508 can mask A-antigen on the cells in vitro. Next, we immunized mice with A-antigen-expressing cells coated with K7508 or its Fab fragment, and measured anti-A antibody production in the mice.

RESULTS

Blood group A-antigen-expressing cells, such as blood group A-red blood cells (A-RBCs) and A431 cells, coated with K7508 were not recognized by another anti-A antibody in flow cytometry, indicating that A-antigen was masked by K7508 in vitro. The A-antigen on the paraffin-embedded liver tissue was also masked by K7508. Furthermore, the production of anti-A antibody in mice immunized with A-antigen-expressing cells coated with K7508 or its Fab fragment was significantly suppressed compared to that in mice immunized with non-coated cells alone, indicating that A-antigen was neutralized by K7508 in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

The neutralization of blood group antigen by antiblood group antibody and especially its Fab fragment might represent one strategy to overcome ABO-incompatible organ transplantation.

ABO antigen expression in graft tissue: is titration against donor erythrocytes relevant?

ABO-incompatible living donor renal transplantation has become an accepted treatment for end-stage renal disease. Two main factors appear to be important when crossing the ABO barrier, the donor organ A/B antigen expression and the amount of recipient anti-A/B antibody. Antigen expression depends on the ABO blood group and subgroup and may vary in different tissues and cells. The amount of recipient anti-A/B antibody, determined by titration, is very variable. One major drawback with titration is the lack of conformity between different laboratories, making comparisons difficult. For clinical use, the anti-A/B antibody titration technique has to be simple, rapid, and cheap, in addition to being accurate. Although there is a need for more standardized procedures for determination of ABO antibodies, existing techniques are sufficient in the clinical care of patients. To illustrate the variation in susceptibility of different graft tissues to ABO antibodies, in this paper we describe a case of an ABO-incompatible combined liver and kidney transplantation.

Rapid and accurate measurement of anti-A/B IgG antibody in ABO-unmatched living donor liver transplantation by surface plasmon resonance

High anti-blood group A or B (anti-A/B) immunoglobulin G (IgG) haemagglutination titres are associated with poor graft survival in ABO-unmatched liver transplantation. We have previously reported that the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) method can be used to measure anti-A/B IgG levels in the plasma very quickly and quantitatively. The aim of this study was to brush up this SPR method. The anti-A/B IgG antibodies (Abs) were purified from the plasma of healthy volunteers by affinity chromatography and used to establish standard curves for the SPR and flow cytometry (FCM) methods. The haemagglutination test tube (TT), FCM and SPR methods were then used to measure the changes over time in the anti-A/B IgG titres of 25 ABO-unmatched living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. The standard curve permitted the SPR values for the anti-A/B IgG titres to be expressed in microg mL(-1) units. The SPR measurements of the anti-A/B IgG levels in the LDLT recipients correlated very well with the FCM values, whereas the TT values correlated poorly with either method. Furthermore, the SPR method accurately detected the effects of plasma exchange. In conclusion, the SPR method is an accurate, time- and labour-saving method for measuring anti-A/B IgG titres that can be easily standardized.

Successful ABO-incompatible liver transplantation using A2 donors

INTRODUCTION

The longer waiting time for a liver graft among patients with blood group O makes it necessary to expand the donor pool for these patients. We herein have reported our experience with ABO-incompatible liver transplantation using A(2) donors to blood group O recipients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1996 to 2005, 10 adult blood group O recipients received 10 A(2) cadaveric grafts. Mean recipient age was 52 +/- 7.7 years (mean +/- SD). The initial immunosuppression was induction with antithymocyte globulin (n = 2), interleukin-2-receptor antagonists (n = 3), or anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab, n = 1), followed by a tacrolimus-based protocol. No preoperative plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption, or splenectomies were performed.

RESULTS

Patient and graft survival was 10/10 and 8/10, respectively, at 8.5 months median follow-up (range 10 days to 109 months). Two patients were retransplanted because of bacterial arteritis (n = 1) and portal vein thrombosis (n = 1). The six acute rejections, which occurred in four patients, were all reversed by steroids or increased tacrolimus dosages. The pretransplant anti-A titers against A(1) red blood cells were 1:128 (NaCl technique) and 1:8 to 1024 (IAT technique). The maximum postoperative titers were 1:64 to 4000 (NaCl) and 1:256 to 32000 (IAT).

CONCLUSION

The favorable outcome of A(2) to O grafting, with a patient survival of 10/10 and graft survival of 8/10, makes it possible to consider this blood group combination also in nonurgent situations. There was no hyperacute rejection or increased rate of rejections. Anti-A/B titer changes seem to not play a significant role in the monitoring of A(2) to O liver transplantation.

Structural characterization of blood group A glycolipids in blood group A liver tissue in situ perfused with O blood: the dominating presence of type 1 core chain A antigens

BACKGROUND

Biochemical studies of organ blood group antigen expression show a mixed pattern originating from both the organ tissue and remaining blood cells trapped in the organ despite in vitro perfusion of the vascular tree. The blood group A glycolipid expression was studied in a unique case in which a human liver had been in situ perfused by recipient blood.

CASE HISTORY

A blood group O recipient was re-transplanted with an ABO incompatible A1Le (a - b +) liver. Because of discrepancy in size, liver segments II and III were removed 2 h after re-vascularization. Thereafter, the removed A1 liver segment was physiologically in situ perfused with O blood, eliminating a major part of the donor blood cells/plasma.

EXPERIMENTAL

Total neutral glycolipids were isolated from the liver tissue and separated by high-performance liquid chromatography. Purified glycolipid fractions were stained with anti-A monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and structurally characterized by mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy.

RESULTS

Two blood group A reactive glycolipid compounds were isolated. One component had a thin-layer chromatography (TLC) mobility as a six-sugar glycolipid and reacted with mAbs specific for A type 1 mono-fucosyl structures. The second glycolipid fraction migrated as seven-sugar components and reacted with mAbs specific for type 1 difucosyl (ALeb) as well as Leb determinants. Mass spectrometry of the six-sugar component showed a structure similar to a blood group A hexaglycosylceramide with one fucose. Mass spectrometry and proton NMR spectroscopy of the seven-sugar fraction revealed a mixture of blood group Leb hexa- and ALeb hepta-glycosylceramides, respectively. All fractions were non-reactive with antibodies specific for A antigens based on types 3 and 4 core chain structures. In addition, TLC immunostaining of glycolipids isolated from blood group A livers, harvested for organ transplantation but discarded for various reasons, revealed trace amounts of several A glycolipids with a complex pattern.

CONCLUSION

The in situ perfused liver tissue contains blood group A glycolipids based exclusively on type 1 core chains. The secretor gene (Se) codes for a fucosyltransferase acting on all core chain precursors while the H-gene fucosyltransferase only utilizes the type 2 chain precursor. Whether this explains that only A type 1 chain compounds were found has to be established.

Adult ABO-incompatible liver transplantation, using A2 and B donors

BACKGROUND

The longer waiting time for a liver graft in patients with blood group O makes it necessary to expand the donor pool for these patients. This applies in both urgent situations and for elective patients. We report on our experience with ABO-incompatible liver transplantation using A2 and B non-secretor donors here.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1996 and 2005, 12 adult blood group O recipients (seven male/five female) received ABO-incompatible cadaveric liver grafts (10 A2 donors, two B non-secretor donors). The indications were either rapid deterioration of liver function or hepatocellular cancer, in blood group O recipients, where an ABO-identical/compatible graft was not available. Mean recipient age was 54+/-8 (mean+/-SD) yr. All pre-operative CDC crossmatches were negative. The initial immunosuppression was induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin (n = 3), interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (n = 3) or anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab) (n = 1), followed by a tacrolimus-based protocol. Three patients underwent plasmapheresis post-transplantation. Baseline biopsies were taken before or immediately after reperfusion of the graft and after grafting when clinically indicated. No pre-operative plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption or splenectomies were performed.

RESULTS

Patient and graft survival was 10/12 (83%) and 8/12 (67%), respectively, with a 6.5-month median follow-up (range 10 days to 109 months). Two patients (B non-secretor grafts) died of multiorgan failure probably because of a poor condition before transplantation. Three patients were retransplanted. Causes of graft loss were bacterial arteritis (n = 1), death with a functioning graft (n = 1) and portal vein thrombosis (n = 2). In one of the patients with portal vein thrombosis, an anti-A titer increase occurred concomitantly, and ABO incompatibility as the cause of the thrombosis cannot be excluded. Seven acute rejections occurred in five patients and all were reversed by steroids or increased tacrolimus dosage. The pre-transplant anti-A titers tested against A1 red blood cells were 1 to 128 (NaCl technique) and 4 to 1024 (indirect antiglobulin technique, IAT); the maximum postoperative titers were 16 to 2048 (NaCl) and 256 to 32,000 (IAT).

CONCLUSION

The favorable outcome of A2 to O grafting, with a patient survival of 10/10 and a graft survival of 8/10, makes it possible to also consider this blood group combination in non-urgent situations. The use of non-secretor donor grafts is interesting but has to be further documented. There was no hyperacute rejection or increased rate of rejection. Anti-A/B titer changes seem not to play a significant role in the monitoring of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation.

Characterization of the humoral immune response in two paediatric patients transplanted with split livers from ABO-incompatible living-related donors: appearance of cytomegalovirus-induced ABO antibodies

Two blood group O paediatric patients, 12 and 6 months old, were transplanted with liver segments from their blood group A2Le (a(-)b+) Se and blood group A1Le (a(-)b+) Se fathers, respectively. Recipient anti-A antibody titres were reduced prior to transplantation by blood exchange. Both patients had rejection episodes in the post-transplant period that were reversed by anti-rejection therapy. No anti-A antibody titre rise occurred concomitant with these rejections. Postoperatively both patients had cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections, and simultaneous with these infections, a strong increase in anti-A antibody titres was seen, but no rejection occurred. The anti-A antibody titre increase seemed to be specific for A antigens, because the anti-B and anti-alphaGal (anti-pig) antibody titres did not show any changes. CMV infection is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality in immunosuppressed patients, and the virus can influence glycosylation of infected cells. Whether this can explain the importance of the infection in relation to the increase in titre remains to be elucidated.

Determinants of ABH expression on human blood platelets

Platelets express ABH antigens, which can adversely effect platelet transfusion recovery and survival in ABH-incompatible recipients. To date, there has been no large, comprehensive study comparing specific donor factors with ABH expression on platelet membranes and glycoconjugates. We studied ABH expression in 166 group A apheresis platelet donors by flow cytometry, Western blotting, and thin layer chromatography relative to donor age, sex, A1/A2 subgroup, and Lewis phenotype. Overall, A antigen on platelet membranes, glycoproteins, and glycosphingolipids was linked to an A1 red blood cell (RBC) phenotype. Among A1 donors, platelet ABH varied significantly between donors (0%-87%). Intradonor variability, however, was minimal, suggesting that platelet ABH expression is a stable, donor-specific characteristic, with 5% of A1 donors typing as either ABH high- or low-expressers. Group A2 donors, in contrast, possessed a Bombay-like phenotype, lacking both A and H antigens. Unlike RBCs, ABH expression on platelets may be determined primarily by H-glycosyltransferase (FUT1) activity. Identification of A2 and A1 low expressers may increase the availability and selection of crossmatched and HLA-matched platelets. Platelets from group A2 may also be a superior product for patients undergoing A/O major mismatch allogeneic progenitor cell transplantation.

The role of B cells and alloantibody in the host response to human organ allografts

Some human organ transplants deteriorate slowly over a period of years, often developing characteristic syndromes: transplant glomerulopathy (TG) in kidneys, bronchiolitis obliterans in lungs, and coronary artery disease in hearts. In the past, we attributed late graft deterioration to "chronic rejection", a distinct but mysterious immunologic process different from conventional rejection. However, it is likely that much of chronic rejection is explained by conventional T-cell-mediated rejection (TMR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and other insults. Recently, criteria have emerged to now permit us to diagnose AMR in kidney transplants, particularly C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries and circulating antibody against donor human leukocyte antigens (HLA). Some cases with AMR develop TG, although the relationship of TG to AMR is complex. Thus, a specific diagnosis of AMR in kidney can now be made, based on graft damage, C4d deposition, and donor-specific alloantibodies. Criteria for AMR in other organs must be defined. Not all late rejections are AMR; some deteriorating organs probably have smoldering TMR. The diagnosis of late ongoing AMR raises the possibility of treatment to suppress the alloantibody, but efficacy of the available treatments requires further study.

Intrahepatic cholestasis after liver transplantation

Cholestasis is a common sequela of liver transplantation. Although the majority of cases remain subclinical, severe cholestasis may be associated with irreversible liver damage, requiring retransplantation. Therefore, it is essential that clinicians be able to identify and treat the syndromes associated with cholestasis. In this review, we consider causes of intrahepatic cholestasis. These may be categorized by time of occurrence, namely, within 6 months of liver transplantation (early) and thereafter (late), although there may be an overlap in their causes. The causes of intrahepatic cholestasis include ischemia/reperfusion injury, bacterial infection, acute cellular rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, small-for-size graft, drugs for hepatotoxicity, intrahepatic biliary strictures, chronic rejection, hepatic artery thrombosis, ABO blood group incompatibility, and recurrent disease. The mechanisms of cholestasis in each category and the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome are discussed in detail.