Successful liver transplantation after induction chemotherapy in children with inoperable, multifocal primary hepatic malignancy

High survival rates after liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma

Unresectable malignant liver tumors may be treated by LTx. We evaluated the results of LTx for HB and HCC. All patients transplanted for HB or HCC between 1990 and 2007 were included. Effects of histologic tumor type, primary tumor resection, disease staging, and serum AFP levels at diagnosis and at transplantation on disease recurrence and survival were evaluated. Twelve patients with median age of five (range, 2-16) were transplanted and followed for a median of 11 (2-18) yr. Six patients had HB and six had HCC. At diagnosis, eight patients were staged as PRETEXT III and four patients as PRETEXT IV. Two patients had pulmonary metastases. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median time from diagnosis to LTx was seven (2-133) months. At LTx, none of the patients had radiological evidence of extrahepatic disease, and the median AFP level was 85 (6-15 180) microg/L. No routine chemotherapy after LTx was used.The overall one-, five-, and 10-yr cumulative survival rates were 100%, 80%, and 67%, respectively. Survival was comparable between the two tumor types (4/6 for both). Two deaths occurred secondary to tumor recurrence, one of each tumor type. Both of these patients had an AFP response of <99%. Six of eight patients with primary LTx survived, when compared to two of four transplanted after primary resection. PRETEXT tumor staging had no effect on survival. LTx even without post-transplantation chemotherapy is an effective treatment option for unresectable HB and HCC with comparable survival. Incomplete AFP response to chemotherapy and primary tumor resection were associated with decreased survival.

Liver transplantation for the management of hepatoblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Hepatoblastoma (HEP) is the most frequent liver malignancy occurring in childhood. Surgical resection currently represents the gold standard for treatment. In patients with initially unresectable tumors, chemotherapy may induce remarkable reductions in size. In nonresponder patients, liver transplantation (OLTx) may offer a chance of cure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1990 to 2003, a total of 400 OLTx (31 pediatric transplants) have been performed at Padua University. Seven patients (4 males and 3 females) underwent OLTx for hepatoblastoma. All patients presented with bilobar liver involvement and had received chemotherapy according to the SIOPEL-1. In all patients preoperative staging was negative for extrahepatic involvement.

RESULTS

The mean age of the pts was 8.2 years (range 6.4 months to 34 years). Mean follow-up after OLTx was 41.4 months (median 36, range 3 to 108 months). Actuarial patient survival rates after OLTx for hepatoblastoma are 83.3%, 83.3%, and 56% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Five of seven subjects with HEP are alive after transplant at 3, 12, 36, 65, and 108 months. Two patients died owing to recurrent disease after 6 and 60 months, respectively, from transplantation. Another subject, primarily treated with surgical resection, shows HEP recurrence at 40 months after OLTx. The remaining 4 patients are alive and well at a mean follow-up of 28 months (median 24, range 3 to 65 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplantation may represent a valid therapeutic option for patients with unresectable HEP, but it is contraindicated in cases of recurrence following previous resection surgery. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is of paramount importance to obtain good long-term results.

Anti-alpha-fetoprotein imaging is useful for staging hepatoblastoma

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (Tx) has become an alternative treatment of malignant childhood liver tumors, and the importance of careful pretransplantation evaluation has been emphasized. Anti-alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) imaging has been suggested for evaluation of adult patients with AFP-positive tumors.

METHODS

Antibody imaging utilizing Tc-99 m-labeled monoclonal anti-AFP Fab' fragments was used to demonstrate pathologic uptake in hepatoblastoma (HB).

RESULTS

Radical operation or liver Tx was not possible after four cycles of chemotherapy in a child with HB because of a single extrahepatic metastasis. Chemotherapy was continued, and reevaluation with anti-AFP imaging demonstrated a pathologic uptake only in the liver. Subsequently, a right liver lobe resection was performed. Along with a new rise in serum AFP, repeated anti-AFP imaging revealed active liver tumor but no metastases. A liver Tx was performed, and the child is well with a normal serum AFP level 18 months after the operation.

CONCLUSION

This is the first case of pediatric HB in which anti-AFP imaging has been successfully used for patient management.

Recent advances in pediatric liver transplantation

Pediatric liver transplantation has matured into a well-established, highly successful treatment for advanced pediatric liver disease. Recent 1-year success rates range from 85% to 95%. This unprecedented achievement is the result of careful selection criteria and optimal timing of transplantation, technical advances in surgical technique, and improved treatment following transplant. This report highlights many recent published findings representing advances that have led to current successful approaches.

Liver transplantation. The pediatric challenge

Successful liver transplantation in a child is often a hard-won victory, requiring all the combined expertise of a dedicated pediatric transplant team. This article outlines the considerable challenges still facing pediatric liver transplant physicians and surgeons. In looking to the future, where should priorities lie to enhance the success already achieved? First, solutions to the donor shortage must be sought aggressively by increasing the use of from split-liver transplants, judicious application of living-donor programs, and increasing the donation rate, perhaps by innovative means. The major immunologic barriers, to successful xenotransplantation make it unlikely that this option will be tenable in the near future. Second, current immunosuppression is nonspecific, toxic, and unable to be individually adjusted to the patient's immune response. The goal of achieving donor-specific tolerance will require new consideration of induction protocols. Developing a clinically applicable method to measure the recipient's immunoreactivity is of paramount importance, for future studies of new immunosuppressive strategies and to address the immediate concern of long-term over-immunosuppression. The inclusion of pediatric patients in new protocols will require the ongoing insistence of pediatric transplant investigators. Third, the current immunosuppressive drugs have a long-term morbidity and mortality of their own. These long-term effects are particularly important in children who may well have decades of exposure to these therapies. There is now some understanding of their long-term renal toxicity and the risk of malignancy. New drugs may obviate renal toxicity, whereas the risk of malignancy is inherent in any nonspecific immunosuppressive regimen. Although progress is being made in preventing and recognizing PTLD, this entity remains an important ongoing concern. The global effect of long-term immunosuppression on the child's growth, development, and intellectual potential is unknown. Of particular concern is the potential for neurotoxicity from the calcineurin inhibitors. Fourth, recurrent disease and new diseases, perhaps potentiated by immunosuppressive drugs, must be considered. Already the recurrence of autoimmune disease and cryptogenic cirrhosis have been documented in pediatric patients. Now, a new lesion, a nonspecific hepatitis, sometimes with positive autoimmune markers, that may progress to cirrhosis has been recognized. It is not known whether this entity is an unusual form of rejection, an unrecognized viral infection, or a response to immunosuppressive drugs themselves. Finally, pediatric transplant recipients, like any other children, must be protected and nourished physically and mentally if they are to fulfill their potential. After liver transplantation the child's growth, intellectual functioning, and psychologic adaptation may all require special attention from parents, teachers, and physicians alike. There is limited understanding of how the enormous physical intervention of a liver transplantation affects a child's cognitive and psychologic function as the child progresses through life. The persons caring for these children have the difficult responsibility of providing services to evaluate these essential measures of children's health over the long term and to intervene if necessary. Part of the transplant physician's our duty to protect and advocate for children is to fight for equal access to health care. In most of the developing world, economic pressures make it impossible to consider liver transplantation a health care priority. In the United States and in other countries with the medical infrastructure to support liver transplantation, however, health care professionals must strive to be sure that the policies governing candidacy for transplantation and allocation of organs are applied justly and uniformly to all children whose lives are threatened by liver disease. In the current regulatory climate that increasingly takes medical decisions out of the hands of physicians, pediatricians must be even more prepared to protect the unique and often complicated needs of children both before and after transplantation. Only in this way can the challenges of the present and the future be met.

Long-term survival after liver transplantation in 4,000 consecutive patients at a single center

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term survival outcomes of a large cohort of liver transplant recipients and to identify static and changing factors that influenced these outcomes over time.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Liver transplantation has been accepted as a therapeutic option for patients with end-stage liver disease since 1983, with continual improvements in patient survival as a result of advances in immunosuppression and medical management, technical achievements, and improvements in procurement and preservation. Although many reports, including registry data, have delineated short-term factors that influence survival, few reports have examined factors that affect long-term survival after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Four thousand consecutive patients who underwent liver transplantation between February 1981 and April 1998 were included in this analysis and were followed up to March 2000. The effect of donor and recipient age at the time of transplantation, recipient gender, diagnosis, and year of transplantation were compared. Rates of retransplantation, causes of retransplantation, and cause of death were also examined.

RESULTS

The overall patient survival for the entire cohort was 59%; the actuarial 18-year survival was 48%. Patient survival was significantly better in children, in female recipients, and in patients who received transplants after 1990. The rates of retransplantation for acute or chronic rejection were significantly lower with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. The risk of graft failure and death was relatively stable after the first year, with recurrence of disease, malignancies, and age-related complications being the major factors for loss.

CONCLUSION

Significantly improved patient and graft survival has been observed over time, and graft loss from acute or chronic rejection has emerged as a rarity. Age-related and disease-related causes of graft loss represent the greatest threat to long-term survival.

Transplantation for liver and biliary cancer

The early survival of patients transplanted for liver and biliary cancer is excellent, but the overall mid- to long-term survival is poor. In an era of severe donor organ shortage, it is not justified to allocate donor liver to patients with a suboptimal outcome. Patients with non-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in a non-cirrhotic liver should not be assigned to liver transplantation. Although patients with the fibrolamellar variant have a somewhat better outlook, they are still likely to recur, and the young age of many of these patients is likely to overwhelm any rational approach. The results of transplantation for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in a cirrhotic liver are similar to those achieved with benign disease. The inclusion of such cases as a group is justified, but attempts should be made to resect tumors whenever possible and to not assign the entire group to transplantation as the first and only option. The value of pre- and postoperative adjuvant therapy for this group is still under debate, but the present waiting period is so long that some form of therapy to slow growth and prevent dissemination of tumor cells is probably required. The results following transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma can only be regarded as dismal, and the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma is a contraindication for the procedure. Liver transplantation has a definite place in the treatment of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma and unresectable chemo-responsive hepatoblastoma when confined to the liver, and in a limited number of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.