Development of cytomegalovirus resistance to ganciclovir after oral maintenance treatment in a renal transplant recipient

Unexpectedly high inter- and intrapatient variability of ganciclovir levels in children

Few studies report Ganciclovir or Valganciclovir levels in children. Single-center, retrospective study of all available Ganciclovir levels in transplanted children. Ganciclovir monitoring was performed as previously described [G. Filler (1998); Pediatric Nephrology, 12, 6]. For the normalization of dosing to GFR and target trough levels, we assumed first-order kinetics. We analyzed 57 Ganciclovir levels in 20 children (mean age 8.6 +/- 5.5 yr) treated with intravenous or oral Ganciclovir or oral Valganciclovir. Ganciclovir levels were drawn after IV therapy (n = 9), during oral Ganciclovir (n = 5), or during oral Valganciclovir (n = 15). Oral bioavailability of Valganciclovir was 42.0 +/- 21.8%. The dose-normalized intrapatient Valganciclovir variability was 83%. Mean GFR was 92 +/- 22 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Mean Ganciclovir concentration at last available measurement was 0.60 +/- 0.09 mg/L. While target trough Ganciclovir levels have not been established, possibly subtherapeutic Ganciclovir levels <0.5 mg/L on recommended IV doses were found in eight patients. This subset of patients was significantly younger (4.5 +/- 3.1 vs. 11.4 +/- 5.0 yr). Levels <0.5 mg/L were found in 24/57 instances and 10 patients subsequently had their dose increased. The last Valganciclovir dose adjusted to a GFR of 100 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was 842 +/- 323 mg/m(2)/day. A high proportion of patients had low Ganciclovir levels both on intravenous and oral therapy. The oral bioavailability of Valganciclovir was 42%. Our data suggest substantial inter- and intrapatient variability of Ganciclovir levels after pediatric renal transplantation and may support the need for pharmacokinetic monitoring of Ganciclovir and Valganciclovir therapy for the prevention and treatment of CMV disease after pediatric transplantation. It is currently unclear what target trough level would be most suitable.

The case for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in solid organ transplantation

Cytomegalovirus prevention strategies have been debated for the past decade. This review argues in favour of the prophylaxis strategy. Clinical trials comparing prophylaxis to pre-emptive therapy have, thus far, had insufficient power to differentiate strategies, especially with regard to the indirect effects of CMV. From meta-analyses, prospective trials, observational studies, and case control studies, there is evidence that prophylaxis prevents cytomegalovirus infection and disease, reduces the indirect effects of cytomegalovirus, including organ rejection and transplant associated, all cause mortality as well as opportunistic infection, and even bacteremia as well as post transplant lymphoproliferative disease. Prophylaxis has also been shown to be cost effective. One must recognise that with the current prophylaxis regimens employed for 3 months post-transplantation, late onset cases of cytomegalovirus disease may occur. Cytomegalovirus replication monitoring may be necessary after cessation of prophylaxis, especially in the high risk cytomegalovirus seropositive donor to cytomegalovirus seronegative recipient. Future trials with longer periods of prophylaxis are being undertaken.

Pulmonary involvement during cytomegalovirus infection in immunosuppressed patients

Although cytomegalovirus (CMV) pulmonary involvement after solid organ transplantation is infrequently seen nowadays, CMV pneumonitis is still a potential lethal complication. Introduction of the pp65 antigenemia assay enabled early and rapid diagnosis of CMV viremia in transplant patients prior to symptoms. Also, in asymptomatic patients with CMV viremia, a decreased pulmonary diffusion capacity could be demonstrated. In this review, we discuss clinical and subclinical pulmonary involvement of CMV infection in the immunocompromised host with an emphasis on transplant recipients. The clinical course, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis, and pathophysiology of CMV pneumonitis are discussed.

Clinical characteristics of 13 solid organ transplant recipients with ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus infection

BACKGROUND

Ganciclovir-resistant (GCV-R) cytomegalovirus (CMV) is now being reported with increasing frequency in solid organ transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of all solid organ transplant patients with GCV-R CMV seen between 1990 and 2000 at a single center.

METHODS

Patients with clinically suspected GCV resistance had viral isolates subjected to phenotypic analysis by plaque reduction assay, and also genotypic analysis. Medical records of the 13 patients with GCV-R CMV were reviewed for demographic, microbiologic, clinical, and pathologic data.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were identified, including 5 kidney, 1 heart, and 7 lung transplant recipients. All but one patient (92%) were CMV donor seropositive, recipient negative (D+/R-), and 11/13 (85%) had tissue-invasive CMV. CMV viremia was recurrent in 9/13 (69%); in 2 others, the first CMV episode was fatal. Overall, 9/13 (69%) of patients have died, all of CMV or its complications. Of the 10 who received foscarnet, only one survived. All patients had received GCV-based prophylactic regimens; 8/13 patients (62%) had received CMV hyperimmune globulin (CMVIG) as part of prophylaxis, 6/13 (46%) had received oral ganciclovir, and 5/13 (38%) had received intermittent (3 x/week) IV ganciclovir for prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

GCV-R CMV is associated with CMV D+/R- status, tissue-invasive disease, and high mortality even with foscarnet therapy. Exposure to less than fully therapeutic levels of GCV, in the form of oral or intermittent IV GCV, is common. The use of CMVIG in prophylaxis does not appear to prevent resistance. Further work remains to be done to elucidate the risk factors and optimal mode of prophylaxis and treatment for GCV-R CMV.

Ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus in organ transplant recipients

Ganciclovir-resistant (GanR) cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an emerging clinical problem in organ transplant recipients, particularly recipients of kidney and pancreas and lung transplants. GanR CMV, a late posttransplantation complication, is observed predominantly among CMV-seronegative recipients of organs from seropositive donors, especially among recipients receiving intensive immunosuppression and having prolonged exposure to ganciclovir. Given the limitations of current diagnostic methods, if GanR CMV is clinically suspected, empirical treatment with intravenously administered foscarnet should be used in conjunction with reductions in immunosuppressive therapy and possibly CMV hyperimmune globulin. Better diagnostic tools and newer, less-toxic antiviral agents with different mechanisms of action are urgently needed to decrease the morbidity associated with this complication in organ transplant recipients.

Increased risk of complicated CMV infection with the use of mycophenolate mofetil in allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is increasingly used for prophylaxis and therapy of GVHD in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. In some recent reports of use of MMF in solid organ transplantation a high incidence of CMV disease has been described. We evaluated the frequency and course of active CMV infection in patients who received MMF compared to those who did not receive MMF after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. We retrospectively analyzed 48 adult patients who consecutively underwent unmanipulated allogeneic bone marrow (n = 15) or peripheral stem cell transplantation (n = 33) from HLA-compatible family donors (n = 30) or unrelated donors (n = 18) from February 1997 to September 2000 at our institution. Only patients who were evaluable for the first 100 days were included in this analysis. Sixteen patients received MMF post transplant (MMF+). CMV-antigenemia was monitored by CMV-pp65 antigen. CMV-antigenemia occurred in 14 patients and was virtually only observed in CMV-IgG+ recipients (13/23, 56%). CMV-IgG+/MMF+ patients developed a higher incidence of CMV-antigenemia (8/9, 89%) compared to the CMV-IgG+/MMF- patients (5/14, 35%; P < 0.05). Moreover, five of six patients with persistent or recurrent CMV-antigenemia received MMF. No patient in either group developed CMV disease or died of CMV-related complications. In multivariate analysis including MMF treatment, unrelated vs related donor, GVHD, CMV-serostatus of the donor and stem cell graft type, only MMF treatment was found to be a significant risk factor for both overall and complicated CMV infection.

Combination antiviral therapy for ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus infection in solid-organ transplant recipients

The resistance of cytomegalovirus (CMV) to ganciclovir is a factor in therapeutic failure and disease progression. The clinical significance of such resistance in solid-organ transplantation has not been completely established. Six patients who developed persistent infection due to ganciclovir-resistant CMV were treated with a combination of ganciclovir (50% of the therapeutic dose) and a daily dose of intravenous foscarnet that gradually increased to a maximum of 125 mg/kg. All patients responded clinically within 72-96 hours. Magnesium depletion occurred in all patients. No clinical or laboratory relapses have been observed in 6-30 months of follow-up. Gradually increasing doses of foscarnet combined with half-dose regimens of ganciclovir are safe and can be beneficial in organ transplant recipients with ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection. Larger studies are needed to identify the patients who are most likely to benefit from this regimen.

Infectious disease prophylaxis in renal transplant patients: a survey of US transplant centers

Definitive approaches to most infectious diseases following renal transplantation have not been established, leading to different approaches at different transplant centers. To study the extent of these differences, we conducted a survey of the practices surrounding specific infectious diseases at US renal transplant centers. A survey containing 103 questions covering viral, bacterial, mycobacterial and protozoal infections was developed. Surveys were sent to program directors at all U.S. renal transplant centers. Responses were received from 147 of 245 (60%) transplant centers and were proportionately represented all centers with respect to program size and geographical location. Pre-transplant donor and recipient screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) is uniform, but great discrepancy exists in the testing for other agents. HCV seropositive donors are used in 49% of centers. HIV seropositivity remains a contraindication to transplantation, although 13% of centers indicated they have experience with such patients. Post-transplant, there is wide variety in approach to CMV and Pneumocystis carinii (PCP) prophylaxis. Similarly divergent practices affect post-transplant vaccinations, with 54% of centers routinely vaccinating all patients according to customary guidelines in non-transplant populations. In contrast, 22% of centers indicated they do not recommend vaccination in any patients. We believe an appreciation of the differences in approaches to post-transplant infectious complications may encourage individual centers to analyse the results of their own practices. Such analysis may assist in the design of studies to answer widespread and important questions regarding the care of patients following renal transplantation.

Adverse gastrointestinal effects of mycophenolate mofetil: aetiology, incidence and management

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a relatively new immunosuppressive drug. It inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, a key enzyme in the de novo pathway of purine synthesis, and thus causes lymphocyte-selective immunosuppression. Large clinical trials have revealed the efficacy of MMF in the prevention of allograft rejection when administered together with cyclosporin or tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Although the adverse effect profile of MMF is comparatively benign, gastrointestinal adverse effects are a major concern. These effects are partially explained by the increased immune suppression, by the mode of action and by interactions, particularly with other immunosuppressants. The aetiology of the rarest gastrointestinal adverse effects is still not completely clear. Therapy depends upon the clinical gravity of the adverse effects and is therefore a case of waiting and ob- serving. An adjustment of dosage of immunosuppressants according to the clinical situation and, particularly in the case of MMF, spreading the total dosage over more than 2 daily doses are often sufficient. Should adverse effects persist for a longer period of time and be of a more serious nature, a comprehensive invasive diagnostic process is necessary, including endoscopy and biopsy and the search for opportunistic infections. In this case, dosage reduction or the complete withdrawal of MMF seems to be unavoidable. Severe gastrointestinal complications with MMF are rare, but when they do occur they may require extensive diagnosis and treatment. In the future, therapeutic drug monitoring and, where necessary, pharmacological modifications of MMF could lead to a further reduction of adverse effects with an equal or even increased efficacy.

Lack of emergence of cytomegalovirus UL97 mutations conferring ganciclovir (GCV) resistance following preemptive GCV therapy in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients

Fifty allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients were enrolled in a prospective cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia-guided preemptive therapy trial. Among these, 10 of 34 patients who received ganciclovir exhibited sustained and/or recurrent antigenemia despite treatment. Thirteen leukocyte preparations from these 10 subjects were screened for the presence of the most frequent cytomegalovirus UL97 mutations conferring ganciclovir resistance. None of these mutations were detected after mean and median ganciclovir exposures of 31.6 and 28.0 days, respectively.

Sequence analysis of UL54 and UL97 genes and evaluation of antiviral susceptibility of human cytomegalovirus isolates obtained from kidney allograft recipients before and after treatment

The frequency of infections caused by drug-resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) in solid-organ transplant recipients is not known. Only a few resistant strains have been described in transplant recipients. Antiviral susceptibility to ganciclovir (GCV) and foscarnet (PFA) of CMV isolates from 24 renal transplant patients with CMV viremia and CMV disease before and after therapy were investigated by a solid phase ELISA. The CMV DNA polymerase (UL54) and viral phosphotransferase (UL97) genes were also sequenced. Ten patients did not receive antiviral treatment; five and nine patients were treated with PFA and GCV, respectively. No appearance of drug-resistant viruses was observed in the present study, but one isolate showed a reduced sensitivity to PFA after treatment with GCV. This finding could not be explained by the presence or development of mutations that have been associated with drug resistance in UL54. We found no evidence that short-term treatment of CMV with PFA- or GCV-induced resistance.

Mycophenolate mofetil: suggested guidelines for use in kidney transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive drug designed to inhibit inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH). IMPDH is a key enzyme in the de novo purine synthesis of lymphocytes. It is crucially important for proliferative responses of human T and B lymphocytes. The inhibition of IMPDH thus leads to selective lymphocyte suppression. After successful use in various in vitro and animal models, MMF was brought to clinical trial in patients undergoing transplantation. The drug is rapidly and completely absorbed following oral administration. Pilot studies of administration with cyclosporin and corticosteroids suggested a significant reduction in the incidence of organ rejection at dosages of 1 to 3 g/day. As a result of these studies, 3 pivotal randomised double-blind multicentre trials, involving nearly 1500 patients, were designed to investigate the effects of addition of MMF to different standard immunosuppressive protocols on the prevention of acute renal allograft rejection. After 6 months, the rates of biopsy-proven rejection were significantly reduced in patients receiving MMF. In combination with cyclosporin and corticosteroids, the adverse effect profile resembled that of azathioprine. Most adverse effects were associated with the gastrointestinal tract, the blood system and opportunistic infections. MMF offers improved immunosuppressive therapy following renal and probably other solid organ transplantation. MMF has been licensed since 1995 for the prevention of acute renal allograft rejection in most countries. It has been used in different combinations of immunosuppressive drugs and in various dosages and regimens.

Infections in recipients of kidney transplants

A review of infections in kidney transplant recipients is presented in this article, beginning with a discussion of the pretransplant infectious diseases evaluation and an overview of the timing of infectious posttransplant, and then focusing on individual types of infection.

Cytomegalovirus in renal transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) was first isolated from the salivary gland and kidney of two dying infants with cytomegalic inclusion bodies and reported in 1956 (1). Two other laboratories isolated CMV at approximately the same time. Thus, CMV was initially called "salivary gland virus" or "salivary gland inclusion disease virus". In 1960, Weller et al. (2) proposed the use of the term cytomegalovirus. Klemola and Kaarianinen (3) first described CMV mononucleosis, the principal presentation of previously healthy individuals, in 1965. CMV was first isolated in a renal transplant patient in 1965,

Preemptive therapy versus universal prophylaxis with ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients

Whether preemptive therapy or universal prophylaxis with ganciclovir is the optimal approach against cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains unresolved. Controversy abounds with respect to the efficacy of preemptive therapy, the reliability of preemptive therapy tools, the logistical difficulties in conducting surveillance monitoring for CMV, the cost of prophylaxis, the effect of prophylaxis on indirect sequelae of CMV and epidemiology of CMV, and the potential for emergence of ganciclovir-resistant CMV. Although neither approach is wholly adequate, a discussion of the relative merits and limitations of the 2 approaches may guide the selection of a rational approach toward prevention of CMV infection in organ transplant recipients.

Patterns of cytomegalovirus infection in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone with ganciclovir prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

The impact of tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroid immunosuppression on cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in combination with ganciclovir prophylaxis in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) has not been well studied.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was made of 75 SKPTs performed between 1 January 1996 and 7 January 1999. All patients received ganciclovir for 3 months, but CMV donor (D)+ / recipient (R)- patients received ganciclovir for 6 months.

RESULTS

16/74 (22%) were CMV D+/R-, 25 (33%) D+/R+, 16 (22%) D-/R+, and 17 (23%) D-/R- (1 patient with unknown donor serology was excluded). The mean time to CMV infection was 198 days post-transplant. The incidence of either CMV infection or tissue invasive CMV disease was 16/74 (22%), including 9 (12%) with CMV infection and 7 (10%) CMV disease. The one-year patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates were 91%, 89%, and 83%, respectively. The mean follow-up was 29 months (minimum of 12 months). CMV infection was not associated with an increased incidence of graft failure or mortality. The D+/R- group had the highest incidence of CMV infection (44%) compared with the other serologic groups (17%, P=0.02). Concurrent CMV and rejection occurred more frequently in the D+/R- than the other serologic groups (25% vs. 7%, P=0.03). The D-/R- group had the best outcomes, with no CMV infection, improved kidney graft survival at the end of follow-up (82% vs. 72%, P=0.04) and the highest event-free survival (no CMV infection, rejection, or graft loss) when compared to the other groups (76% vs. 33%, P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to previous studies, ganciclovir prophylaxis delayed the onset and reduced the severity of CMV infection in patients receiving TAC, MMF, and steroids. Despite ganciclovir prophylaxis, CMV seronegative patients receiving CMV D+ organs had worse outcomes than seronegative recipients receiving CMV D- organs.

Cytomegalovirus hepatitis in normal and immune compromised hosts

Liver biopsies of six previously normal hosts (Group I, NH), with recent or acute CMV infection, and autopsy liver samples of four immunocompromised hosts (Group II, ICH) with overwhelming CMV infection have been studied in an occasional survey. In both groups, portal tract involvement, bile duct inflammation, liver cell degeneration and parenchymal granulomas were present. In Group I, a randomly distributed hepatitis with predominant involvement of the periportal areas was present, including sinusoidal arrays of lymphocytes and lymphohistiocytic aggregates. In contrast, in Group II liver cell damage was more extensive and the inflammatory infiltration only scarce. Intracellular viral inclusion bodies were found only in Group II, both in liver cells and in bile duct epithelium. Morphologically, the presence of viral inclusion bodies correlated well with the immunohistologic demonstration of CMV specific "late" (CMV-LA) or structural antigens. In addition, CMV-specific "early" (CMV-EA) or non-structural antigens were present in liver cell nuclei of 2/6 NH and 2/4 ICH. The possible relations between the inflammation and the lack of structural antigenic viral expression are discussed. It is concluded that ICH with CMV infection have a prominent cytopathogenic effect and widespread lytic viral infection in the liver in the absence of adequate immunologic reactivity, whereas the opposite is found in NH.