Factors predicting the long-term success of maintenance cyclosporine monotherapy after kidney transplantation

Mycophenolate Monotherapy in HLA-Matched Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Case Series of 20 Patients

The ideal minimizing strategy for maintenance immunosuppression in HLA-matched kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is unknown. We hypothesized that mycophenolate (MPA) monotherapy is a safe and effective approach for maintenance therapy in this group of KTR.

Methods

Data were abstracted for 6-antigen HLA-matched KTR between 1994 and 2013. Twenty recipients receiving MPA monotherapy secondary to infection, cancer, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) side effects, or immunosuppression minimization strategies were evaluated in this case series.

Results

MPA monotherapy had a low incidence of death-censored graft failure (3.19/100 person-y), rejection (0/100 person-y), hospitalization (1.62/100 person-y), malignancy (3.61/100 person-y), and infection (1.75/100 person-y). Further, 12-month mean or median serum creatinine (1.29 mg/dL), estimated glomerular filtration rate (64.3 mL/min/1.73 m2), urine protein creatinine ratio (143.2 mg/g), hemoglobin (13.9 g/dL), platelets (237.8 K/uL), and white blood cell count (9.04 K/uL) were favorable. There was a successful conversion rate of 90% (18 of 20) with 2 patients converting back to CNI-based regimens secondary to recurrence of membranous nephropathy and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that MPA monotherapy may be a promising immunosuppression minimization strategy for HLA-matched KTR.

Minimization of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy after renal transplantation comparing cyclosporine A/azathioprine or cyclosporine A/mycophenolate mofetil bitherapy to cyclosporine A monotherapy: a 10-year postrandomization follow-up study

Long-term outcomes in renal transplant recipients withdrawn from steroid and submitted to further minimization of immunosuppressive regimen after 1 year are lacking. In this multicenter study, 204 low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients were randomized 14.2 ± 3.7 months post-transplantation to receive either cyclosporine A (CsA) + azathioprine (AZA; n = 53), CsA + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n = 53), or CsA monotherapy (n = 98). At 3 years postrandomization, the occurrence of biopsy for graft dysfunction was similar in bitherapy and monotherapy groups (21/106 vs. 26/98; P = 0.25). At 10 years postrandomization, patients' survival was 100%, 94.2%, and 95.8% (P = 0.25), and death-censored graft survival was 94.9%, 94.7%, and 95.2% (P = 0.34) in AZA, MMF, and CsA groups, respectively. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 70.4 ± 31.1, 60.1 ± 22.2, and 60.1 ± 19.0 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively (P = 0.16). The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 1.4%/year in the whole cohort. None of the patients developed polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. The main cause of graft loss (n = 12) was chronic antibody-mediated rejection (n = 6). De novo donor-specific antibodies were detected in 13% of AZA-, 21% of MMF-, and 14% of CsA-treated patients (P = 0.29). CsA monotherapy after 1 year is safe and associated with prolonged graft survival in well-selected renal transplant recipient (ClinicalTrials.gov number: 980654).

A 50% reduction in cyclosporine exposure in stable renal transplant recipients: renal function benefits

BACKGROUND

Although cyclosporine maintenance therapy reduces the risk of acute rejection and increases short-term graft survival in renal transplant recipients, its associated nephrotoxicity increases the risk of chronic graft dysfunction. The dose that allows an optimal risk-to-benefit ratio has not been established.

METHODS

This multicentre study enrolled stable renal allograft recipients receiving cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil without corticosteroids in their second year post-transplant. Patients were randomized to a cyclosporine dose targeted to a standard area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)(0-12 h) (usual exposure, n = 104) or 50% of the study standard AUC(0-12 h) (low exposure, n = 108) using a three-point pharmacokinetic sampling. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with treatment failure at 24 months (graft loss/acute rejection/nephrotoxicity/>15% serum creatinine level increase).

RESULTS

Treatment failure was reported in 37 out of 101 (37%) patients in the usual-exposure and 19 out of 106 (18%) patients in the low-exposure groups (P = 0.003). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased from baseline to 2 years with usual exposure and increased with low exposure (P < 0.001). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were lower with low exposure (P = 0.03 and P = 0.008, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In renal transplant recipients receiving maintenance therapy without corticosteroids, a minimization strategy using three-point pharmacokinetic sampling to reduce and maintain cyclosporine exposure to 50% of the usual levels is safe and reduces the risk of graft dysfunction.

Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Steroid-sparing strategies have been attempted during the last two decades in order to avoid morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. Previous systematic reviews of steroid withdrawal after kidney transplantation have shown significant increases in acute rejection and an increase in graft failure rates. Steroid avoidance in kidney transplantation is increasingly attempted and the possible benefits or harms have never been a subject of a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of steroid withdrawal or avoidance in patients receiving a kidney transplant.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE, references lists and abstracts from international transplantation society scientific meetings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies (RCTs) of steroid avoidance or withdrawal were included providing that one treatment arm consisted in steroid avoidance or withdrawal and intention-to-treat rates of acute rejection and graft failure were clearly established after steroid avoidance or use or withdrawal or continuation. Observational studies were tabulated.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 30 RCTs (5949 participants). Steroid-sparing strategies showed no effect on mortality or graft loss including death. Patients on any steroid-sparing strategy showed a higher risk of graft loss excluding death than those with conventional steroid use (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.52), especially in those not receiving MMF/Myf or everolimus (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.90). Acute rejection was more frequent with a steroid-sparing strategy (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.40) and more frequent after steroid withdrawal or avoidance when compared with standard steroid treatment when cyclosporin (CsA) was used. Steroid-sparing and withdrawal strategies showed benefits in reducing antihypertensive drug need, serum cholesterol, antihyperlipidaemic drug need, new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) requiring any treatment and cataracts. Steroid avoidance did not alter serum cholesterol, but was associated with less frequent NODAT requiring any treatment. Cardiovascular events were reduced with steroid avoidance. Reduced antihypertensive drug need and serum cholesterol were similar with CsA or tacrolimus (TAC). Reduced antihyperlipidaemic drug need was only evident with TAC, whereas the reduction in NODAT requiring any treatment was only evident with CsA. Infection was lower in steroid-sparing patients using CsA (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.00). NODAT requiring any treatment was less frequent with steroid avoidance than with steroid withdrawal.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review confirms that steroid avoidance and steroid withdrawal strategies in kidney transplantation are not associated with increased mortality or graft loss despite an increase in acute rejection. These immunosuppression strategies may allow safe steroid avoidance or elimination a few days after kidney transplantation if antibody induction treatment is prescribed or after three to six months if such induction is not used.

Factors contributing to long graft survival in non-heart-beating cadaveric renal transplantation in Japan: a single-center study at Kitasato University

A total of 107 cadaveric kidneys from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) have been transplanted between 1974 and 2000 at Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan. The patient survival of the 107 recipients of cadaveric renal transplants at 1, 5 and 10 yr was 0.857, 0.770 and 0.746, respectively. The 50% graft survival was 3.8 yr. The 5 and 10-yr graft survival was 0.457 and 0.337, respectively. Twenty of the 107 recipients of non-heart-beating cadaveric renal transplantation had graft survival longer than 10 yr. Of these 20 patients, 14 survivors still maintain functioning renal grafts and two died with functioning graft, although the remaining four reverted to dialysis because of chronic rejection and nephropathy. The average graft survival of these 20 patients at the time of study was 13.3 yr and the longest was 21.4 yr. The average serum creatinine level at 10 yr after transplantation was 1.63 mg/dL, almost identical to that at 5 yr post-transplant. The donors aged on average 40.2 yr; 13 were male and seven were female. The youngest donor was 9-yr-old and the oldest was 66. The graft survival was significantly better in the group with donor age younger than 55 yr (Log-rank: p=0.007). The average weight of the renal graft was not different between the long and shorter graft survival groups. The average warm ischemic time and total ischemic time were 9.7 and 539.7 min, respectively. The duration of post-transplant acute tubular necrosis averaged 9.2 days. These parameters tended to be shorter than those in recipients with graft survival >10 yr, but with no statistical significance. The mean numbers of acute rejection (AR) episode within 3 months after transplantation were 0.25 +/- 0.66 and 0.92 +/- 0.90 (p=0.020) in long survival and shorter survival groups, respectively. Long survivors had a significantly lower incidence of AR. Two of 20 cases received conventional immunosuppression with prednisolone, azathioprine and mizoribin, and 18 had prednisolone and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant contribution of CNI to graft survival (p=0.036). However, the graft survival reduction rate after 1 yr post-transplant did not differ between conventional and CNI immunosuppression. These data suggest that renal grafts retrieved with proper organ procurement procedures from NHBDs may survive long-term and help to overcome donor shortage.

Correlação do esquema de imunossupressão com complicações pós-operatórias em transplantes renais através do uso da cintilografia renal dinâmica

A cintilografia renal dinâmica possibilita o diagnóstico de complicações observadas nos tecidos transplantados, como desordens na perfusão do órgão, necrose tubular aguda e quadros de rejeição. Empregamos o 99mTc-DTPA neste estudo e correlacionamos os achados cintilográficos e clínicos visando ao diagnóstico de rejeição ou outra forma de complicação no órgão transplantado. Tanto as rejeições quanto as complicações foram avaliadas em relação ao tipo de imunossupressão utilizada. Foram analisados 55 pacientes submetidos a transplante renal entre 1989 e 1999. Todos os pacientes com nefrotoxicidade faziam uso do esquema tríplice de imunossupressão. Neste estudo houve predominância de rejeição aguda, em 40,4% dos casos. Treze dos quinze pacientes cujos doadores eram cadáveres tiveram necrose tubular aguda. Foi observado apenas um caso falso-positivo, em que o exame cintilográfico foi incompatível com a clínica. Sugerimos o uso da cintilografia renal no acompanhamento pós-operatório dos pacientes transplantados.